Steinmeier called the condition for the return of Russia to G8

105
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier reported on the conditions under which Russia "will be returned to the G8." According to Steinmeier, for such a return Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements. RIA News cites a statement by the head of German diplomacy:

There are no convincing historical examples of how isolation and rejection would bring us closer to world peace. Therefore, the largest industrially developed countries of the world should be interested in seeing Russia return to the G8 circle, if only Russia fulfills its part (obligations) to implement the Minsk agreement.




At the same time, Steinmeier added that some regard Russia's membership in international organizations as a kind of gift to Moscow, but this kind of membership was formed because of "the role that Russia played and continues to play" (Steinmeier’s words - note "IN").

Frank-Walter Steinmeier:
We have different experiences (of cooperation) with Russia: on the one hand, the unlawful annexation of the Crimea by Russia and the destabilization of eastern Ukraine. However, almost at the same time, Russia contributed to the successful completion of negotiations on a solution to the Iranian nuclear conflict. Realistic looking, everyone recognizes: we need Russia to overcome the big international hotbeds of the crisis.


Earlier, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that they did not consider any conditions put forward to Russia to be appropriate for returning to G8.
  • 1905.az
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    16 May 2016 06: 25
    And what side are the Minsk agreements for us? Russia is an observer country, not a party to the conflict. Drunk Germans signed the Minsk agreement, or what ???
    1. +4
      16 May 2016 06: 26
      Will we accept them, that’s the question?
      1. +53
        16 May 2016 06: 46
        Quote: Teberii
        Will we accept them, that’s the question?

        It depends on how you persuade laughing
        1. +22
          16 May 2016 07: 53
          Still, German Foreign Minister Steinmeier reminds me of Hitler and his entourage.
          On the one hand, the COLONIALIST says sincerely in relation to Russia. In his understanding, as before, the Russian implementation should not have any national interests of its own and should in all respects obey Germany, the USA and the “civilized West”. Only then, as an incentive for good behavior on the part of Russia, will she be able to cynically PROMISE (!) To admit her to the general "master" table G7.
          On the other hand, in Steinmeier itself is full of some kind of humiliating feeling that was personally characteristic of Hitler himself, when he was completely completely dependent in his career on the disposition of representatives of the USA, England and France. That is, when Germany itself was a supercolony of foreign powers after the WWII.
          Therefore, all the words of Steinmeier are a miserable empty sound!
          1. +4
            16 May 2016 08: 17
            Quote: Tatiana
            Therefore, all the words of Steinmeier are a miserable empty sound!

            I agree with you, besides, they urgently need to raise the fallen status of Europe itself, without Russia they are almost nothing against the background of the growing economies of Asia and South America represented in the GXNUMX, in which, in fact, the conversation is taking place seriously. The relevance of the dialogue in the GXNUMX is absent and Russia is not interested in this format of communication at the present time.
            1. +5
              16 May 2016 11: 09
              American lackey slumber. All of them are now American slaves - the whole geyvropa. (with a small letter r)
            2. +2
              16 May 2016 13: 19
              Quote: Jura
              The relevance of the dialogue in the GXNUMX is absent and Russia is not interested in this format of communication at the present time.


              And without this G 8, what can we do?
          2. +6
            16 May 2016 11: 01
            Quote: Tatiana
            Still, German Foreign Minister Steinmeier reminds me of Hitler and his entourage.

            --------------------
            He recalls the old mudril, like all German politics. By the way, he wants us in Libya to help them bomb. They themselves didn’t give a shit, but they asked us to remove them. Absolutely already.
        2. cap
          +6
          16 May 2016 09: 27
          Quote: inkass_98
          Quote: Teberii
          Will we accept them, that’s the question?

          It depends on how you persuade laughing

          bear

      2. +24
        16 May 2016 07: 16
        And we need it! Paying contributions to international organizations is what they expect from us ..
        1. +30
          16 May 2016 07: 50
          Quote: dmi.pris
          And we need it! Paying contributions to international organizations is what they expect from us ..

          Dmitry, plus you, if you could bet more, these watchdogs are absolutely right, only our money is needed. The same PACE will first deprive the Russian delegation of the right to vote, and when they were sent by the forest with an annual contribution, oh, how the abusers were offended. I don’t I can understand how sideways Russia should fulfill the Minsk agreements, if it is a guarantor, and not a contracting party, in which case Germany and France should also fulfill Minsk 2, they are also guarantors.
          1. +8
            16 May 2016 07: 57
            Quote: vlad66
            Quote: dmi.pris
            And we need it! Paying contributions to international organizations is what they expect from us ..

            Dmitry, plus you, if you could bet more, these watchdogs are absolutely right, only our money is needed. The same PACE will first deprive the Russian delegation of the right to vote, and when they were sent by the forest with an annual contribution, oh, how the abusers were offended. I don’t I can understand how sideways Russia should fulfill the Minsk agreements, if it is a guarantor, and not a contracting party, in which case Germany and France should also fulfill Minsk 2, they are also guarantors.

            These tricks should be performed by Minsk, they made a batch, their signatures, forward to storming the Bastille recourse
            1. +2
              16 May 2016 10: 14
              I agree we don’t need them G, this again will again be a blackmail tool that they will exclude us again, etc. in short they hear us and so, accept what we say are not going to in any case ...
          2. +4
            16 May 2016 08: 19
            And let's recall for a moment that the main points of the Minsk agreements were personally voiced by Putin before the start of negotiations in Minsk. Blaming Russia for failure is somehow silly.
        2. +8
          16 May 2016 08: 11
          Quote: dmi.pris
          And we need it! Paying contributions to international organizations is what they expect from us ..

          Not only. As soon as the "fried rooster" begins to peck in the crown, help Russia, pull Russia out of the shit. And now, sitting up to its ears in a cesspool called Ukraine, the EU is trying to bait in the form of the Big Eight, to shove the problems that they have caused in Ukraine, in the Russian Federation. By the way, according to the Minsk agreements, the Russian Federation owes nothing to anyone. The FRG and France acted as guarantees.
        3. +6
          16 May 2016 08: 51
          It seems they have already officially announced that we need this J8 - an interest club, like an umbrella fish ?! And, it seems, as they were already sent in the right direction on this occasion ?!
          Maybe they forgot to translate into German? Or, again, so indistinctly muttered that the nonsense did not understand?
          All this only says that they do not listen to us, do not hear and do not want to hear.
          You can continue to lick these nonhumans ...
      3. +5
        16 May 2016 08: 02
        The question is different. Need G7 Russia or Russia need G7? The answer is obvious. A format appeared more interesting than the G20.
        1. +11
          16 May 2016 09: 03
          The question is different. Need G7 Russia or Russia need G7? The answer is obvious. A format appeared more interesting than the G20.

          Here is the absolutely correct formulation of the question: DOES IT NEED RUSSIA? It’s already obvious that for G7 the presence of Russia in their G8 format critically important. Judging by how Steinmeier jerked, Europe realized that with the departure of Russia, it would turn from GREAT-7 to zero without a wand.

          Without Russia, Europe will remain on the sidelines of world politics to deal with its internal problems. And absolutely no one will be interested in the opinion of Europe, because really big and independent boys will do politics: Russia, China and the USA (with an Englishwoman behind her).

          And so now Europe is shouting - "Russia come back!"
          But Does a bear need fleas ?! Yes, even those that set their conditions for him. : D

          IMHO, Russia needs to confirm through the first persons that the G8 format is dead, there can be no return to past politics. Russia no longer intends to endure continuous bites from the Americanos sixes - now it goes on to talk directly with their master. And sixes can even drown if so stupid.

          Look, - the Camel did not have time to win the Eurovision Song Contest, and Europe used this reason to humiliate Russia: they gave the Ukropov puppet a voice with the conditions for admission to Euro 2017. The more Russia participates in a variety of THEIR formats, the more they will find reasons to prick and bite Russia. In order not to fall to their level, to the level of the bazaar scandal, Russia must leave this bazaar. It didn’t bother a respectable person.
      4. +4
        16 May 2016 09: 22
        Strange guys, they are voicing some kind of conditions among themselves, as if they are doing a favor. In my opinion, everything is very simple with Russia: they will invite - Russia will think. Light in a clear window. And frankly, these geopolitical bargains have already hesitated.
    2. +33
      16 May 2016 06: 28
      Quote: Oleg Chertkov
      And what side are the Minsk agreements for us?

      They have already formed some kind of sect of "Witnesses of Russia's implementation of the Minsk agreements." Yes
    3. +18
      16 May 2016 06: 41
      Steinmeier speaks up, carries some kind of nonsense, it's time to retire grandpa. wassat
      We don't need your G8 for nothing, and we don't need it for money. These "fighters for freedom and democracy" from Europe have already gone to bed. laughing
    4. +8
      16 May 2016 06: 52
      П
      Quote: Oleg Chertkov
      And what side are the Minsk agreements for us? Russia is an observer country, not a party to the conflict. Drunk Germans signed the Minsk agreement, or what ???

      It has long been time for our officials, at all the summits and European gatherings there, to demand from the participants of the so-called Norman format of Germany and France to demand the implementation of the Minsk agreements and put forward the conditions under which Russia will agree to participate in the G-8, because without her participation, this bunch is simply PPC they don’t even have anything to say there without Russia, not that it’s something to decide.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +4
      16 May 2016 07: 52
      This is the absurdity of the modern World. For some reason, the events that Ukraine should carry out are being hung up on Russia. Vicious circle. Looks like a schiz.
    7. +2
      16 May 2016 07: 53
      Che exaggerate this topic? They have long been sent to the farm. stop
    8. 0
      16 May 2016 07: 56
      Well yes. In order not to be so ashamed, schnapps were pumped. As before, when the guarantees were signed ...
    9. +1
      16 May 2016 08: 37
      Quote: Oleg Chertkov
      And what side are the Minsk agreements for us? Russia is an observer country, not a party to the conflict. Drunk Germans signed the Minsk agreement, or what ???


      Why do we even have to join G? This is generally some kind of incomprehensible hangout in which every condom pretends to be an airship.
    10. +2
      16 May 2016 08: 56
      Quote: Oleg Chertkov
      And what side are the Minsk agreements for us? Russia is an observer country, not a party to the conflict. Drunk Germans signed the Minsk agreement, or what ???


      The only way to implement the "Minsk agreements" is to court the parliament, the government, the president and all their supporters.
    11. 0
      16 May 2016 09: 15
      But why the hell are we supposed to be there, in this eight, what do we do with that? Ours, what interests? We can well out of them (sevens), we have more than twenty. As for them without us, it is their problem.
    12. 0
      16 May 2016 09: 21
      Quote: Oleg Chertkov
      And what side are the Minsk agreements for us? Russia is an observer country, not a party to the conflict. Drunk Germans signed the Minsk agreement, or what ???

      You know this, as in a proverb, and you want and prick. I'd like to lift the sanctions, but Russia said that it was not we who introduced them, it was not for us to cancel. Yes, there is also the United States crushing. And Europe rushes about like a monkey laughing
    13. 0
      16 May 2016 21: 57
      Let the Germans and the French then perform MS and Belarusians too. Lukashenko also flickered there. And to listen to Europe, Ukrainians are not at all involved.
  2. +14
    16 May 2016 06: 26
    Steinmeier called the condition for the return of Russia to G8
    But does Russia need it? you can drive empty at home ...
    1. +1
      16 May 2016 07: 46
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      you can drive empty at home

      Come on empty do not get distracted! Drive what you need! And do not forget to precipitate and filter after potassium permanganate.
      Hi racer! drinks
      1. +1
        16 May 2016 07: 51
        hello Evil! hi
  3. +7
    16 May 2016 06: 28
    Why the hell do we need her?
    1. +3
      16 May 2016 06: 36
      Well, the German decided to raise his bar by presenting the conditions for Russia, and didn’t think in advance that they could send him ..., (the black dad apparently made up his mind).
  4. +20
    16 May 2016 06: 35
    Let this gentleman remember the guarantor of what he performed on February 21, 2014 in Ukraine, and what songs Yanukovych sang. First you need to answer for your affairs, and only then set conditions for others.
    1. 0
      16 May 2016 08: 25
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      . First you need to answer for your affairs

      They were not accustomed to answering for the bazaar. Therefore, you need to fill this impudent, greasy face, and then stick your nose into the guarantor of which he spoke to Yanukovych. What they promised Yanukovych, they were too lazy to look, they did nothing.
  5. +5
    16 May 2016 06: 36
    Do we need to go there? Does it give us something useful? request
  6. +4
    16 May 2016 06: 36
    We have different experience (cooperation) with Russia
    yes yes yes. And in my opinion it has already been said that we do not need this ZhI8 at all.
  7. VP
    +18
    16 May 2016 06: 38
    Lavrov has long said about returning to the G8 - we are not satisfied with the format of the organization in which seven countries try to put pressure on one at work, we are not interested in it. When there is a direct dialogue, outside the framework of associations, it is much more fruitful and effective, in this case, each of the countries observes its interests and does not "express a consolidated opinion." And then it turns out that this opinion does not always coincide with the imposed "consolidated" one.
    The interest to drag us back to the G8 is understandable. But this is their interest, not ours.
    Who needs it - Welkam to Moscow for discussion.
    The guys themselves hurried, now realizing that they foolishly lost one of the instruments of pressure trying to "return everything to the backside"
  8. +8
    16 May 2016 06: 39
    Steinmeier, we somehow don't want to be in your "F". Sit in this "w" without Russia. And we feel good outside in the fresh air.
  9. +1
    16 May 2016 06: 40
    Put your G8 in the anus, along with your conditions gentlemen members! Useless from you, like a goat's milk.
    Work at home above the roof, here let’s plow at home and not fulfill some strange conditions!
  10. +4
    16 May 2016 06: 41
    We are 8 and don’t have a gift and don’t have money wassat
    1. +2
      16 May 2016 08: 09
      Quote: Rav075
      We have this 8 and don’t be free

      I don’t know what they think there, there is a superpower Ukraine. Let them take it, instead of us
      Ukraine is ready to take a place in the G8 if Western countries exclude Russia from the GXNUMX, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk made it clear at a meeting with the Canadian Prime Minister.
      March 23 2014
  11. +5
    16 May 2016 06: 41
    if only Russia will fulfill its part (obligations) to implement the Minsk agreement.

    Maybe it's time for Germany and France to fulfill their part of the obligations? In the Minsk agreements, Russia with these countries on equal terms, but as always require something from our country. On the other hand, we feel fine even without this cabal (G-8).
  12. +2
    16 May 2016 06: 43
    Shtanmaeru is constantly lying about what is happening in the Donbas. If the Russian troops are actively involved in this conflict, if this were the case the tricolor would have developed in Kiev a long time ago.
  13. +3
    16 May 2016 06: 43
    Like ..... with a written shell, Steinmeier is worn with this G-8.
    We have already made it clear that this "club" by interests (read the United States and its six) is not interesting to us. We solve our problems well in the twenty. Moreover, there are many more options for solutions. But all the same, as an institute, mutters and mutters about some conditions that we must fulfill request fool
    This is not the first time, by the way. lol Although, what you take from the vassal - whatever is ordered, it says smile
  14. +2
    16 May 2016 06: 45
    Yes, they went with their presents. Sami choking. Inside, they are already clearly shown who they are. And soon the elections, so that moaning is clear))))
  15. +3
    16 May 2016 06: 46
    Do your own gangbang: seven members and one J. wassat
  16. +5
    16 May 2016 06: 47
    G8 needs Russia, but Russia needs it?
  17. +1
    16 May 2016 06: 48
    Let G7 / 8 fly into one place.
    They understand that without Russia they have reached an impasse, but the Minsk agreements excite their brains.
  18. +1
    16 May 2016 06: 48
    He considered him a smart man. Recently, he began to carry all kinds of nonsense. With whom to talk in the G-8? With Canada? An industrialized country that does not have a gold reserve. European countries that do not have an opinion, are also not a participant in the negotiations. America remained, well, so you need to talk to her.
    1. VP
      +3
      16 May 2016 07: 07
      Quote: asiat_61
      With Canada? An industrialized country without a gold reserve.

      Canada in the PPP GDP is in the second ten, even Mexico with South Korea, Indonesia and Brazil is higher.
      What she does in this G is incomprehensible; she is there not at all according to rank.
      Although, of course, I’m disingenuous, it’s clear what he’s doing there - he’s giving slippers to the States.
      At the same time, there is no China, the largest economy with world influence far greater than Canada.
      1. 0
        16 May 2016 07: 10
        Quote: VP
        Quote: asiat_61
        With Canada? An industrialized country without a gold reserve.

        Canada in the PPP GDP is in the second ten, even Mexico with South Korea, Indonesia and Brazil is higher.
        What she does in this G is incomprehensible; she is there not at all according to rank.
        Although, of course, I’m disingenuous, it’s clear what he’s doing there - he’s giving slippers to the States.
        At the same time, there is no China, the largest economy with world influence far greater than Canada.

        you need to look at GDP per capita.
        and economic development.
        the so-called post-industrial stage of development.
        1. 0
          16 May 2016 09: 46
          Let me add a dozen more: Ditch is not an independent state at all. Look who is their head of state (at the ditches)? The Queen of England. All "states" of the commonwealth have this. Remember Thatcher did not start a war with Argentina until the queen gave the go-ahead.
        2. VP
          +1
          16 May 2016 09: 50
          Quote: atalef
          you need to look at GDP per capita.

          Yes ?
          So the number one in the G8 will be Liechtenstein and the number two is Switzerland?
          There will be Ireland with Denmark. Iceland and Norway, and Great Britain with Germany and Japan, especially France and Italy will not be close?
          Interesting approach
  19. +3
    16 May 2016 06: 48
    What Minstki agreements, they themselves read them and implemented them, and even without this 8th Russophobic party we live very well, there’s no need to add sanctions, and continue to isolate Russia tolerant from you, it’s only good for us hi
  20. +2
    16 May 2016 06: 49
    Steinmeier, stand aside with your conditions!
    It seems to me, pretty soon, all of these from G7 will come to us in a live queue. Yes, they will push each other.
  21. +1
    16 May 2016 06: 51
    How will they be allowed to attend, something will change? NATO will be dispersed? Missile defense will be removed?
  22. +2
    16 May 2016 07: 03
    A little off topic a little; to the tiger Amur the goat Obama is being hooked ... fellow
    1. 0
      16 May 2016 12: 30
      why not the topic? as I understand it, the bear return to our sheep under the leadership of the goat IMHO
  23. +1
    16 May 2016 07: 09
    Solve your problems within the EU, breathe in the air, and then look at G-how many Russia will or will not (if he sees fit for himself!). For those wishing to have Russia as the person responsible for the implementation of the Minsk Agreements, I suggest finding yourself in the text of the agreements: (Russia is mentioned in the text once - Ambassador of the Russian Federation in Ukraine M.Yu. Zurabov)
    link to A set of measures to implement the Minsk agreements

    http://ria.ru/world/20150212/1047311428.html
  24. +2
    16 May 2016 07: 14
    We will dictate the conditions, the offspring of a fascist. For now, dance, Kamarinsky, under the conditions of the Turks. You cannot put things in order in your country, but put forward conditions for others to sit down at your table. Yes, after all that you have done with the World and My people at the table with you to sit "zapadlo". And do not pull your hand any more at the meeting "you are our tolerant".
  25. +5
    16 May 2016 07: 16
    Steinmeier: -We have different experience (cooperation) with Russia ...

    ABOUT! Ja! Ja! The experience is different for you, but after your experiments we always have the same result - Victory Day is called!
  26. +1
    16 May 2016 07: 23
    and we need it, we don’t drip from the sky without this intersection ...
  27. +3
    16 May 2016 07: 26
    Do you still want to send Steinmeier?
    Then continue!
  28. +1
    16 May 2016 07: 26
    So things in Geyrop are not so hot, otherwise they would not be invited. But do we need it?
  29. 0
    16 May 2016 07: 31
    It seems to me that it’s not right for them, but for us to set the conditions under which the Russian Federation may agree to return to this G8. And why did the old man again pull this dreg into the light of day? They want to make us guilty of the disruption of the Minsk agreements due to the fact that the Ukrainian first drunk does not have the will and influence to restrain the local natsgad?
  30. 0
    16 May 2016 07: 34
    Seemingly smart, but decided that Russia needs it with the letter "G". Tries to lure, as if doing a favor.
  31. +4
    16 May 2016 07: 54
    Steinmeier called the condition for the return of Russia to G8

    Russia had to fall off the G8 for a long time, but Russian officials held onto it as a platform for hanging out (as they still hold on to PACE where we have not even had the right to vote for almost two years).
    It's time to end this mess and consist only in those organizations where there is the possibility of dialogue, especially on the basis that membership in all these clubs is paid.
  32. +2
    16 May 2016 08: 07
    German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier reports on the conditions under which Russia will be “returned to the GXNUMX”

    But does Russia now want to go there, why not ask?
    As comrade Lavrov, who is the Foreign Minister, said: "This club is not interesting for us." Or something similar request
    So let them amuse themselves with their meetings of "sixes", "sevens" and other numbers.
    Russia has its own interests and it will voice them then and wherever it wants. request lol laughing
  33. +1
    16 May 2016 08: 07
    Why do we need this anti-Russian party? Those who need it, breaking their legs, will jump to Moscow themselves, and the nerves of GDP must be protected. Communicating immediately with so many evil-sizzling. In turn, the children of the female dog, in turn ...
  34. +1
    16 May 2016 08: 23
    And they asked the Russian Federation whether Russia needed this finished G8))
    They left the unfinished seven, without a giant unit occupying half of Eurasia!)))
    Western policy, complete and final idiocy)) the case is completely inoperable))
  35. +1
    16 May 2016 08: 35
    As S. Lavrov already said, it was just a convenient format for negotiations, and without the Russian Federation, nothing can be resolved anyway. It makes no sense to put something as a condition of "returning" there. And this Jesuit "fulfillment of agreements" is just a hint that they are not being fulfilled, so petty.
  36. +3
    16 May 2016 08: 40
    Dear forum users!
    I propose especially not to worry about Russia's membership in the G8. They don’t really need our membership there (it would have been necessary, they would have dragged it by the legs), all the more so. Steinmacher just gets himself political points on this topic.
    And, it seems to me that he hardly read the text of these very "Minsk agreements".
  37. +1
    16 May 2016 08: 41
    Is his record stuck? Hit him on the head.
  38. +1
    16 May 2016 08: 48
    Dear, absolutely not the right approach to the problem, namely Russia should name the conditions under which it is possible to consider Russia's participation in this organization, it’s time to really put the EU in place and any political statements on this subject should not even be commented on
  39. 0
    16 May 2016 08: 49
    One gets the impression that Herr the Minister did pick up the Svidomo bacillus from Klimkin, he seems to be a professional, and when he speaks, he turns into an Amer or a Little Russian, a kind of European bureaucratic inferiority, then a quote from S. Lavrov.
  40. +2
    16 May 2016 08: 56
    Two! Conditions.
    The desire of the United States and its sixes to dialogue.
    The desire of the Russian Federation to have a dialogue in this format.
    No other conditions are required. And talking heads can exercise as much as they like.
  41. vmo
    +1
    16 May 2016 08: 56
    First, we de .... mi not on the way.
    Secondly, does Russia need this?
    Thanks for the science of pragmatism!
  42. +1
    16 May 2016 09: 03
    Silly hopes to lure us into the talking room and try to dictate something to us.
    The hopes of the youths are nourished, and by old age it would be necessary to become smarter. However, the presence of infantilism and a narrow mind is a hallmark of most Western politicians.
  43. Cat
    0
    16 May 2016 09: 16
    Full Ge 7.
  44. cap
    +2
    16 May 2016 09: 20
    "German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier announced that under what conditions will Russia be “returned to the GXNUMX”... According to Steinmeier, for such a return, Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements. RIA Novosti quotes a statement from the head of German diplomacy "

    "on what conditions will Russia be" returned to the Big Eight ""
    I would say under what conditions Russia will return there, and whether it will return at all.
    This is also a big question.
  45. 0
    16 May 2016 09: 23
    Again they position themselves above Russia as puppets. Although, maybe this is a hint of dill that Western support is ending
  46. 0
    16 May 2016 10: 20
    And in Russia, these sixes with their multi-star master? There is a desire to speak - let them come. Only everyone makes his decision. And so that they decide whether they will be allowed to sit with this shobla - why do we need this?
  47. +1
    16 May 2016 10: 27
    G7 is a group that the United States gathers to advance its interests.
    Therefore, China is not there, because it acts in its own interests, and not in the interests of the United States.

    It seems to me shame and shame if we go back there, shame on us since we were there.
  48. 0
    16 May 2016 10: 28
    died, she died, there is nothing to spend money on these gatherings.
  49. 0
    16 May 2016 10: 29
    Steinmeier called the condition for the return of Russia to G8
    As if we are begging them to do this))) DEBILS
  50. +2
    16 May 2016 10: 41
    "Be afraid of your desires - they can come true!" (C)
    Russia has the opportunity to achieve the implementation of the Minsk Agreements by ALL parties to the conflict, using the method of "forcing peace", as in 2008 ...
  51. +1
    16 May 2016 10: 45
    "According to Steinmeier, for such a return Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements."
    Maybe Germany also needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements (Ukrainian slaves do not play a role in this matter) and then we may accept the G7. And so let them go... further on their way to the bright Islamic world.
  52. 0
    16 May 2016 10: 47
    I wonder, under what conditions, fulfilled by the West, will Russia agree to join (get into) this very G7?
  53. 0
    16 May 2016 10: 51
    It is not surprising that a person who does not care about his obligations (signature!) to Yanukovych carries such nonsense. His words mean nothing and apparently he understands this.
    IMHO - a political loser and sang along with Merkel's puppet.
  54. +2
    16 May 2016 10: 51
    After everything that happened, Russia’s return to the G8 format is impossible and unnecessary. I believe our leadership needs to communicate this loudly and clearly so that such talk stops. It was not enough for various Stanmeiers to set conditions for us; let him set conditions for his wife.
  55. 0
    16 May 2016 11: 02
    Steinmeier made a statement not for Russia, but for Europe. They need to somehow explain the need for Russia’s presence at their “parties.” They will do us a favor. D.B.
  56. 0
    16 May 2016 11: 03
    (German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier announced the conditions under which Russia will be “returned to the GXNUMX.” According to Steinmeier, for such a return Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements.)

    Do we need “it”? G-8 with Russian participation is a GIFT to the West, but not the other way around. Let the Western “neutons” think and scratch the top bone, and we will go about our business, of which we have a great many.
  57. 0
    16 May 2016 11: 18
    We will accept strange “statements”, but with conditions!!! Forget about Crimea, take dill into your union of over-aged and senile people, because only a madman can “throw away” money for its restoration and maintenance.
  58. 0
    16 May 2016 11: 25
    " For such a return, Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements"...

    Hm... For some reason I thought that the main “signatories-guarantors-executors” of the Minsk agreements were Ukraine, Germany and France...

    In this case, one can say about Steinmeier: “Something has happened to my memory, I don’t remember everything that happened and passed”...
  59. +1
    16 May 2016 11: 27
    And at this moment, our Foreign Ministry is already tired of making statements that Russia is not a party to the Minsk agreements as a party to the conflict.
    I am still amazed at our haste and short-sightedness.
    After all, it was clear that if we did not get a representative of Kyiv and the DNRLPR to sit at the official negotiating table, then this would be a losing situation for us. And so it happened, we showed weakness and haste, did not achieve direct negotiations and ultimately lost, and Russia is perceived by the whole world as a party to the conflict.
    Putin sat opposite Parashenko with the participation of 2 mediators Merkel and Holland. This is a fact and this is a minus for us.
    Why the devil was Comrade Putin in such a hurry? Have you fallen for some kind of scam from Merkel again?

    The fact that Kuchma met with Pushilin and blah blah blah. It was officially announced that Kuchma has no official status in the negotiations; he does not have any mandate from Parashenko.
    Checkmate.
    Why was this done?
    Perhaps Putin was promised that everything was ok, we’ll sign and...
    And then bang, after the negotiations, Putin is also a party to the conflict!
    But then how can you be so naive again? They just cheated with the Mistrals, the foreign ministers of Germany and France cheated Yanukovych...
    In general, our foreign policy is not discussed in depth for more than a month.
    If someone had advised me to do this and prepared meetings this way... Such advisers are a filthy broom!

    But the fact is that Russia is a party to the conflict with Ukraine! The West achieved its goal (and it doesn’t matter how).
    And now he sets conditions! And our Foreign Ministry remains silent!
  60. 0
    16 May 2016 11: 55
    These gentlemen, finding themselves up to their necks in shit wassat , still trying to look white and fluffy.
    But it drips and stinks. Are we on the right track with such “partners”? You can get dirty yourself.
  61. 0
    16 May 2016 12: 06
    As everyone loves to set conditions, so set them
    conditions for migrants, but we don’t need them.
  62. 0
    16 May 2016 12: 28
    It's time for this minister to retire. Sounded sick.
  63. 0
    16 May 2016 13: 38
    The Gay Europeans are always trying to ride into heaven on someone else’s hump.. well, well..
  64. Tim
    +1
    16 May 2016 14: 48
    Ihmo, the big G7 without Russia has turned into the small six Americans. laughing
  65. 0
    16 May 2016 15: 14
    We There (in the AMERICAN 6-SIX CLUB) - NOTHING TO DO
  66. 0
    16 May 2016 16: 53
    Earlier, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that they did not consider any conditions put forward to Russia to be appropriate for returning to G8.
    This is a worthy response to any proposals from our Western “concerned” partners. And our country’s presence in the G8 is hardly beneficial for us.
  67. +1
    16 May 2016 19: 15
    I only read this, I don’t see any point in reading the article further!

    According to Steinmeier, for such a return Russia needs to follow the path of implementing the Minsk agreements.

    Germany and France, as participants in the Minsk agreements, do not want to implement them? Or should only Russia implement the Minsk agreements? Russia is not a party to aggression, the Ukrainian court seems to have confirmed this!!! In short, a vicious circle from which the conclusion follows: Russia will never be able to fulfill what is asked of it and why do we need your club of interests in the form of America and its Sixes

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"