What about what, and the United States - to extend the sanctions

69
Following the summit of the USA and 5 of the North European states (Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Iceland), which was held under the banner of “restraining aggressive Russia”, the heads of the states adopted a statement, which noted the need to extend the sanctions pressure on Moscow, RIA News White House post.



"The United States and the Scandinavian countries reiterate their support for the sovereignty of Ukraine and its territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders," the statement said.

And further:
“Sanctions against Russia due to its actions in Eastern Ukraine cannot be lifted until Russia fully fulfills its obligations under the Minsk agreements. Our sanctions related to the Crimea should also remain in force until Russia regains this territory under Ukrainian control. ”


Earlier, Western media reported that, convening the meeting of the leaders of the North European countries, Barack Obama pursues a well-defined goal - to increase pressure on Russia from the north.
  • AFP
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    14 May 2016 09: 51
    a statement was adopted stating the need to extend sanctions pressure on Moscow

    Let them leave the sanctions, it’s better for us!
    In the "sanctions" regime, our domestic producers can plan at least something! Agriculture has got a real chance to revive! And the Europeans let their farmers go bankrupt, cut jobs and feed the Arabs ...!
    As for the other economic consequences, so the peak of the crisis has passed, in general, everything has more or less stabilized. Yes, there are difficulties, but this is temporary - a transitional period.
    1. +25
      14 May 2016 09: 59
      Sanctions against Russia due to its actions in Eastern Ukraine cannot be lifted until Russia fully fulfills its obligations under the Minsk agreements. Our sanctions related to Crimea should also remain in force until Russia returns this territory to Ukrainian control. ”

      What is the Ukrainian control, the people of LDNR have experienced in their skins, so that horseradish wrapped in paper, and not to the Crimea, but let the sanctions remain, you need to have your own and carry out it, rather than feed foreign aunts and aunts.
      1. +22
        14 May 2016 10: 47
        Pancake! 25 again!
        Forum users! How many times have we discussed this before? !!! Many times!
        The INFORMATION article itself WHAT are you minus ?! Do you need important information?
        Or do you just need sweet information, or something, you need to present on the site ?! I wanted to hear what the cons were put to the article, from those who did it!
        Do not know how to rate articles - do not handle!

        And it turns out that you, as readers, are not interested in this information material, and you only tell the VO administration that you do not need such information. Like, I myself with a mustache and so I know all this news! Give me something else!
        Nefig then leave your comments about the information in the article! And if you are discussing information, then be so kind as informing the article to put “+”, and not “-". To authors of articles this is counted in the accumulation of points. Do not beat people's hands for us to work! (By the way, the article is not mine, if someone thought something bad about me. That I’m defending myself.)

        For an informational article +
        By the way, the article is very competently and objectively written in terms of information.
        1. +4
          14 May 2016 10: 55
          convening to a meeting of leaders of the Nordic countries, Barack Obama

          I would say "calling"
        2. +4
          14 May 2016 10: 57
          Minus because they express their attitude to the news, that's all.
          1. +9
            14 May 2016 11: 09
            wild
            Minus because they express their attitude to the news, that's all.

            There are personal posts for your attitude to the news. And reporters-informers do not have to beat off their hands! It's not the journalist's fault that the news is bad. Otherwise, we will all cook in our own "juice"!
            These stupid kings used to be foolish for the bad news of an innocent messenger just executed!
            1. +4
              14 May 2016 11: 20
              Quote: Tatiana
              For your attitude to the news, there are personal posts. And reporters nefig hands off! The journalist is not to blame for the bad news.

              Then a "little" question. Why is there a voting field under such "informational" articles? Submit your claim to the site administration. And there is nothing to "beat off the hands" of those wishing to express their attitude to information. wink
              1. +1
                14 May 2016 14: 18
                So put "+", not "-" for the information provided in gratitude to the authors. The minus in this case means only one thing: not how you treat it in detail, but so that they simply should not be printed on the site.
                The voting field is given to determine the rating of interest in the article. Interesting - not interesting. Print or not print such materials. A kind of is information marketing.
                1. +3
                  14 May 2016 17: 55
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  So put "+", not "-" for the information provided in gratitude to the authors. The minus in this case means only one thing: not how you treat it in detail, but so that they simply should not be printed on the site.
                  The voting field is given to determine the rating of interest in the article. Interesting - not interesting. Print or not print such materials. A kind of is information marketing.

                  With constant perseverance, people are minus articles with a negative background. It seems everyone is aware that the rating of the article is determined by this scale. Can something change in the system? Can add a scale that reflects exactly the reaction to the news?
                  1. +2
                    14 May 2016 18: 39
                    avdkrd
                    With constant perseverance, people are minus articles with a negative background. It seems everyone is aware that the rating of the article is determined by this scale

                    Yes, this is a marketing information line for the editors.
                    Some forum users simply do not know what marketing is.
                    For example, marketers do research in a store.
                    They ask: how do you feel about the fact that the department of dishes is presented in our store? Do you use this department or not? Maybe it’s easy to remove it and replace it with some other sales department more useful for you?
                    The visitor is not asked what design and variety of tea cups he prefers. Not about the assortment of dishes in question. This is in principle - do you need a cookware department for customers in this store or not?
                    So with the news on the site. The rating scale under the article tells the editors of the site not to relate to the news, as to specific cups in the ware department in the store, i.e. as a SINGLE phenomenon, but as the presence of the site section itself, i.e. as to the GENERAL section.
                    In this case, all kinds of information are needed, all kinds of information are important. And thank you to the journalists for reporting them to us.
                    And then please - comment on the news, as you wish, in your posts. And we all respect them and will polemize about the opinions of one or another forum member.
                    Unfortunately, this problem on the "VO" between the forum users is raised every six months.
                    Can something change in the system? Can add a scale that reflects exactly the reaction to the news?

                    Ha! I think that nothing will change from the appearance of the second line. Those who have no idea will do the same, only in two lines. And with their minuses they will reduce points to the authors of these informational articles, which they tried for us.
                    I believe that the site is organized in principle, everything is fine and correct. Only periodically do we have to return to this circumstance with explanations.
            2. +1
              14 May 2016 20: 02
              Quote: Tatiana
              relationship to the news

              Dear Tanya, I put a minus to the article, because for me (I'm sure for many others) there is no news in this article, because this decision of the summit was predictable. Not even the author tried to analyze the event. love hi
              1. 0
                14 May 2016 20: 29
                Quote: unsinkable
                Quote: Tatiana
                relationship to the news

                Dear Tanya, I put a minus to the article, because for me (I'm sure for many others) there is no news in this article, because this decision of the summit was predictable. Not even the author tried to analyze the event. love hi

                Absolutely seglase with you. What article is it about? Where is "Journalist"? Two lines to distort and arrange, you can look at it in Yandex. And here is the work of a student. We don't need such articles.
                Not minus, just a reaction to indignation.
              2. 0
                14 May 2016 23: 59
                unsinkable
                Dear Tanya, I put a minus to the article, because for me (I'm sure for many others), there is no news in this article, because this decision of the summit was predictable

                The news is this: 1) a specific event has occurred - where? when? for what reason? 2) on whose initiative? 3) which countries took part in it? 4) what agreement was reached and what decision was made? All news is described in the article.
                And the article FIXES all this information on a specific site (!) With an ADDRESS (!) Line on the Internet for several years. Therefore, authors of other articles can make references to this information, indicating its electronic resource and the mode of access to this information.
                But your obvious speculation to the matter can not be sewn. They are unofficial. Your speculation remains speculation.
                Feel the difference between specifically stated official information and predictable informal expectations? As well as the applied usefulness and significance of such a news article? I think you feel this difference and understand it.
                This is precisely what distinguishes the printed official article from your correct, but unofficial expectation of the outcome of the summit! And this is a serious difference. Such news articles are crucial on the site. hi
        3. +6
          14 May 2016 11: 17
          Quote: Tatiana
          The INFORMATION article itself WHAT are you minus ?! Do you need important information?

          Judging by the epaulettes you have been on the forum for a long time, but still for some reason have not understood how people vote! If the article is the fruit of the author's thoughts, then they vote for the article, and if the article is "naked" information, then people simply express their attitude to information. hi
        4. +6
          14 May 2016 11: 40
          Quote: Tatiana
          And it turns out that you, as readers, are not interested in this information material, and you only tell the VO administration that you do not need such information.

          --------------------
          The opinion is unequivocal about the sanctions. Sanctions are useful for our industry to squeeze out all unnecessary junk from the market, overpay for brands and organize our own production. They are also useful to our bourgeoisie, so that they do not delude themselves that they are expected there as "ilitu". Our bourgeois are waiting there as food or bedding. You may not publish such articles so often.
        5. +4
          14 May 2016 12: 06
          25 again!
          Just in case, I put a plus for the article, but let me argue. I now know that my school years fell on the days of the Cold War and sanctions against the USSR, but then we didn’t even know about it, we just lived, we just studied, we just worked. And now grief-leaders only talk about sanctions. What are they stuffing their price? Like they could better, but sanctions interfere. That's why I am against such articles. Tell us about the positive in our country, unless of course there is something to be proud of.
          1. +1
            14 May 2016 13: 43
            I appeal to all who are not interested in the article.
            If you have been on the site for a long time, this does not mean that the site is not replenished with new forum participants.
            The site has new forum participants who need to discuss this information and who need to make sure that sanctions will not be lifted from Russia.
            Your conviction in this, dear MARSHALS, and your PATIENCE only helps them to finally understand this. And in the discussion itself there is a unity of opinion that unites us into a nation.
            In addition, the site is read and just ordinary outside readers - not forum users - and among them there are many young people, including from other countries. What is absolutely clear to you, for others this is just a question and a subject for discussion.
            All your posts on the forum are read, dear forum users, and MARSHALS are generally perceived by readers from the side almost as the face of the site.
            Therefore, you, the members of the forum, have a certain civil liability. Be worthy of her.
            I sincerely wish you all success in such an important and responsible business!
            Do not forget about the teaching rule that "repetition is the mother of learning."

            And this article is also still important from the point of view of collecting factorological information on sociology for those who study it or are associated with it. And, by the way, all your opinions in posts, dear forum users, are studied by sociologists, politicians too.
            1. +1
              14 May 2016 14: 58
              Tatyana! Your profile is not that the region of residence or about yourself is not indicated, you do not even have an avatar! You are a phantom! Come to my profile. I have indicated everything and am not afraid, because I am an honest person and I have nothing to fear. And about + and - the article indicated to you above the post.
              1. +1
                14 May 2016 15: 59
                sabakina
                Tatyana! Your profile is not that the region of residence or about yourself is not indicated, you do not even have an avatar! You are a phantom! Come to my profile. I have indicated everything and am not afraid, because I am an honest person and I have nothing to fear. And about + and - the article indicated to you above the post.

                Dear sabakina!
                I went to your profile. And what do I see there?
                Your profile is not that the region of residence and about yourself are not indicated
                You have the same thing - nothing is indicated and even worse.
                My region of residence is reflected in the flag - the Russian Federation. Your region is also reflected - only in the flag.
                You also did not provide personal information about yourself. Moreover, the photo of the woman, apparently, is not yours, the surname is also, as you write in the comments from the MEN’s face!
                When I congratulated the members of the forum on 8 March, I did not put you on the congratulatory list of women-members of the forum on our website, since your posts were written on behalf of the MALE gender. belay
                I have indicated everything and am not afraid, because I am an honest person and I have nothing to fear
                So which of us is a "phantom"? laughing
                And I formalized my profile as I managed - quickly and as I considered it necessary.
                And to our controversy about the ratings of news informational articles, the transition to arguments to the personality in this case, what is the relation? I would like to know from you. hi
    2. +4
      14 May 2016 10: 00
      Barack Obama has a very definite goal - building up pressure on Russia from the north.

      How is he going to put pressure on something, with polar bears? The North of the EU is not the North of Russia.
      1. +2
        14 May 2016 10: 12
        Interestingly, have the Norwegians prepared to eat their salmon and herring?
      2. +1
        14 May 2016 11: 50
        Earlier, Western media reported that, convening the meeting of the leaders of the North European countries, Barack Obama pursues a well-defined goal - to increase pressure on Russia from the north.

        There are two options: either (from pressure!) The hernia will come out, or the navel will loosen ... hi
  2. +11
    14 May 2016 09: 53
    Even the photo shows the attitude of the United States to its vassals. Obama proudly looks away.
  3. +5
    14 May 2016 09: 59
    On May 9, Finland hosted US fighters for conducting exercises in Finnish territory, which is a direct violation of the agreement, which says that Finland does not have the right to provide its territory for the armies of another state and also airfields for conducting exercises and deployment on its territory. Finland can be occupied
    1. +6
      14 May 2016 10: 12
      Quote: Berg194500
      Finland can be occupied

      Start to occupy Finland. belay
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +4
        14 May 2016 11: 32
        Under an agreement to withdraw from the war, the condition is not occupation (the entry of the Red Army units was in my opinion one of the conditions) complete neutrality from Western countries. So you can enter the troops there - violation of the agreement is a crime
        1. +8
          14 May 2016 17: 32
          Quote: Berg194500
          Under an agreement to withdraw from the war, the condition is not occupation (the entry of the Red Army units was in my opinion one of the conditions) complete neutrality from Western countries. So you can enter the troops there - violation of the agreement is a crime

          Damn, LIS, you’re a plus from the Marshal, although you don’t love us, but if you could have bet more that you really have such an agreement? Well, actually Finland can be poked with such a shit.
    2. +4
      14 May 2016 12: 22
      Quote: Berg194500
      Finland can be occupied


      Yes, let's get your combat sofa and go ahead to occupation, we will also repair our sofas and later we will tighten
      1. +1
        14 May 2016 15: 05
        Quote: Humpbacked Horse
        Quote: Berg194500
        Finland can be occupied


        Yes, let's get your combat sofa and go ahead to occupation, we will also repair our sofas and later we will tighten

        Joking jokes, but! If you break the contract with the bank, the bank will come to you! And no matter what uniform, the main thing will come. So what does the contract say?
  4. +8
    14 May 2016 09: 59
    5 Northern European states (Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Iceland
    Especially iceland fool oh how sanctions will undermine Russia. Well, except that they farted by another volcano from hopelessness.
    1. +3
      14 May 2016 11: 01
      So again - this bunch will first go through Europe wink
  5. +3
    14 May 2016 09: 59
    As a truly independent state, we, as a truly independent state, will not ask anyone for permission. We will inform you of our steps. And nobody decree here (except international law). It’s time to understand and remember this.
  6. +3
    14 May 2016 10: 01
    Strengthening the influence of Russia in the world, it’s like a bone in the throat.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. +12
    14 May 2016 10: 01
    The hemoruberoid keeps the nose downwind, and ... Well, the rest recourse ,and here:
  8. +4
    14 May 2016 10: 03
    It is time for Russia to more actively respond to the sanctions of the US sixes and to begin with, stop ordering ships from Finnish shipyards for the Russian fleet and stop supplying Finland with Russian wood, let them choke on American socks ... First of all, you need to stop building nuclear power plants in Finland, at the expense of the Russian budget, Finland will never return this money, and those guilty of such `` generosity '', at the expense of the indigenous population of the Russian Federation, will be severely punished ...
  9. 0
    14 May 2016 10: 05
    This is a scoundrel, this black man: he calls subordinates to himself, gives them instructions on how to harm Russia and its people even more. No, the Americans will wait for them to catch them on the streets and ... send them home to Oklahomshchina or Texas, so that they don’t shine here, and away from sin, as they say! The first ambassador, I think, will go to the start.
    1. +1
      14 May 2016 11: 30
      to Oklahoma or Texas, ,,
      Yes, in the Texans they don’t favor him either. He (the United States) did a lot of business with gender. So they already send him openly.
  10. 0
    14 May 2016 10: 05
    About his support of the sovereignty of Ukraine and its territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders, ”

    But what about the international Helsinki conference? Dura lex, sed lex.
    But should we sue America?
    1. +1
      14 May 2016 14: 20
      Quote: Tusv
      About his support of the sovereignty of Ukraine and its territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders, ”

      But what about the international Helsinki conference? Dura lex, sed lex.
      But should we sue America?

      What kind of sovereignty of Ukraine are you talking about? In January of this year, it was declared that Ukraine is not a state, but an administrative district of the USSR. Http: //www.vitrenko.org/article/20336
      http://maxpark.com/community/129/content/4957099
  11. +1
    14 May 2016 10: 09
    Dear, only smama, a well-to-do economy and an independent financial course, a modern army, are capable of developing both Russia itself and showing other countries an alternative to the American course of "democracy", unfortunately so far there are only words and a deepening in all parameters of the crisis
  12. +2
    14 May 2016 10: 09
    Yu-tube blocked for some reason but here is the link to Ru-tube, look, for a smile - I was under the table!

    Almost the topic))

    https://rutube.ru/video/73bf947194d218e3c7edca3138bee647/?ref=logo
  13. +5
    14 May 2016 10: 13
    They want us to give Crimea? They built a base for NATO in the Crimea, and then we will be allowed to live according to their values, eat cookies, go to pederast parades. Some fantastic people tell everyone their sweet dreams.
  14. +8
    14 May 2016 10: 14
    What words, integration, investment ... In fact, absorption and enslavement! For many years Russia has been "integrated", now we are recovering. And sanctions us an antibiotic to speed up the healing process.
  15. +5
    14 May 2016 10: 17
    Ask the Finns, they don’t grow tomatoes, but now they don’t know where to milk. Dairy enterprises are closing. Tomatoes are a seasonal product, and milk is year-round. Tomatoes are easier if you don’t take tomatoes, then you can plant onions or lettuce, for example. And with cows it’s more difficult to feed them every day, but if you kill a cow today, you can get a replacement only after three years.
    Approximately the same picture is with fisheries in Norway. They raised fish, but there is no one to sell it, because in the EU everything is based on quotas, and Russia has stopped buying fish. There are already ordinary people howling from sanctions.
    Well, the sanctions will be lifted, well, Finland will rush to Russia with its milk to Russia, and here it’s already in bulk with its own milk, and Belarusians and Kazakhs have also added. All Finns are already in ..... with their milk. In the same way, Norway, with its painted salmon, got into trouble.
    1. +1
      14 May 2016 12: 26
      Quote: t118an
      Approximately the same picture is with fisheries in Norway. They raised the fish, but there is no one to sell it, because in the EU everything is based on quotas


      But the Belorussian canal was blocked, I recently saw an Israeli carrot in the store under the inscription Belorusskaya
  16. +3
    14 May 2016 10: 18
    “Sanctions against Russia due to its actions in Eastern Ukraine cannot be lifted until Russia fully fulfills its obligations under the Minsk agreements. Our sanctions related to the Crimea should also remain in force until Russia regains this territory under Ukrainian control. ”


    This assembly as a coven is no longer a name.
  17. +1
    14 May 2016 10: 23
    Quote: olegfbi
    Agriculture got a real chance for a revival!

    NU-NU, but have you encountered agriculture? In our district, it’s just dying away, and there’s zero support .... In a week, I’ll report and goodbye to the IP ....
    1. +2
      14 May 2016 12: 30
      Quote: dimdimich71
      NU-NU, but have you encountered agriculture? In our district, it is only fading, and there is zero support.


      And we also

      An attraction of unprecedented generosity or how to slip through all the polymers and pretend that it was planned. The Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation distributed subsidies for investment loans in crop production and dairy farming for 2016. Murmansk region owes 48 with a penny for plant growing and, attention, 000 thousand (!!!) rubles for dairy cattle breeding.

      https://bloger51.com/2016/02/59512
    2. +1
      14 May 2016 13: 25
      Someone really thinks that everything is fine with us, sitting on the couch and reading the press and watching television, and drive around Siberia and ask the peasants ... I EARLIER WRITTEN - HOW I ANSWERED - WE HAVE FAVORABLE ONLY DESTINATION OF TOURISM AND SOUVEREN PRODUCTS AND THIS IS AN ANSWER AT THE DEPUTY LEVEL .... !!!!!
  18. +4
    14 May 2016 10: 24
    The scarecrow has not yet grown. Cuba lived for 56 years under their sanctions, a country with a gulkin nose. We found someone to intimidate, most of us are not liberals to be intimidated.
  19. +4
    14 May 2016 10: 27
    "... Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Iceland ..."
    Well, okay, the USA is some kind of probable enemy, but where is this "dandruff" ?! They do not know to whom to cuddle from fear and genetic inferiority ?! The formula: "Five countries - five" Topols "has not been canceled. Utyrk does not reach ...
  20. +4
    14 May 2016 10: 29
    Maybe it's time for Russia to announce proactive sanctions? And what kind of aggression against Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, maybe it's time?
  21. +2
    14 May 2016 10: 32
    Drum these "figures" on the neck, horn in the teeth and forward with a song.
  22. +2
    14 May 2016 10: 32
    Of all these countries, only Sweden and Denmark pose some sort of threat - they control the Baltic Straits. But neither the one nor the other are not going to fight with Russia. This striatum wants to put their warriors in Finland and Sweden. And for this they intimidate Russian aggression.
  23. +2
    14 May 2016 10: 33
    The governments of three countries remained concerned about sanctions against Russia: the United States, GB and Ukraine, the rest perceiving these sanctions as a mandatory burden on the right of the individual without sanctioned existence ...
  24. +2
    14 May 2016 10: 38
    Our people have not seen this, think about yourself,
    politicians of the northern territories of the USA, NATO and the EU.
  25. +1
    14 May 2016 10: 38
    He has nothing to do with the cat, he puts his Faberge in order, and the Americans, even worse than the cat, do not know where to attach their sanctions. What Obama at the end of his term is reminiscent of a maniac who has his flies (love hot spots) in his head ... bully
  26. +1
    14 May 2016 10: 51
    Crimea is first of all 2,3mln Russian citizens. Do you need to wrap them together with the peninsula ??? This is not Alaska 561tys. residents and we do not demand her back (yet) ...
  27. +1
    14 May 2016 11: 04
    What vile faces, and Obama again lifted his chin up, it remains to hand the flag and hang the bass drum around his neck! Ugh, what a pull it pulls! I’ll go to the storehouse for a liter.
  28. +1
    14 May 2016 11: 38
    MPH you have been sent, and not the integrity of Ukraine (read Crimea). Crimea was Russian when you, a herd of bastards, urinated in diapers. There is no longer such a state - Ukraine, gangs, anarchy, fascists of all stripes.
    Senya, a bastard, deceived, because he promised to erect a fence on the border.
  29. +1
    14 May 2016 11: 43
    As the American pope will say so, it will be, and the Samites are a consolation for suckers !!!
  30. +2
    14 May 2016 11: 51
    Who is talking about, and the lousy talks about the bath, and Obama with his lousy about sanctions. Let the sanctions remain, they spur domestic production in the country.
  31. +2
    14 May 2016 12: 40
    a statement was adopted stating the need to extend sanctions pressure on Moscow, the White House reports to RIA Novosti.
    At least another 5-10 years sanctions lasted ....... maybe we will have time to stand on our feet before the decisive battle.
  32. +1
    14 May 2016 14: 29
    "Sanctions against Russia because of its actions in Eastern Ukraine cannot be lifted until Russia fully fulfills its obligations under the Minsk agreements" ...
    And what obligations under the Minsk agreements did Russia undertake, or what obligations were imputed to Russia by the Minsk agreements (although, if imputed, then these are not obligations, but obligations)? I carefully read the text of these agreements on the website of the President of the Russian Federation and did not find such obligations. Well, perhaps paragraph 10 on the withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine, but where are our armed formations in Ukraine? Despite all the screams of Poroshenko and his western masters, not a single regular Russian soldier was found in Nezalezhnaya. There are volunteers from Russia, but there have never been any soldiers. And Russia did not bring volunteers to Ukraine, they went there themselves - that is why they are volunteers. It's just that the anger of our overseas "partners" and their European hangers-on is strangling that Russia has escaped from under their influence.
  33. +1
    14 May 2016 16: 17
    "The United States and the Scandinavian countries reiterate their support for the sovereignty of Ukraine and its territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders," the statement said.

    smile the combination of "sovereignty" and "Ukraine" amused ..
  34. 0
    14 May 2016 18: 55
    Ladder of fools led by fuel oil.
  35. 0
    14 May 2016 21: 24
    Gentlemen, I ask you to explain to me and others, what is the responsibility of the Russian Federation under the Minsk agreements on ending the conflict in the south-east of Ukraine? In short - what, where, when. What happens is the annihilation of an unwanted population (who did not support the junta, Donetsk and Lugansk)
  36. 0
    15 May 2016 12: 43
    The news set a plus, if it could have put another plus for the sanctions. Since before Russia's accession to the WTO, the annual growth of its GDP was 6-7%, and then at the level of statistical error. If oil prices fell without sanctions, the economic situation in Russia would be even worse. And they supported our own producer and scored at the WTO, sanctions, s. Even if the West suddenly enlightens and lifts sanctions, then Russia does not have to rush to abolish its own.
  37. 0
    16 May 2016 08: 49
    As the godfather said so it will be. And when it will be different, in the future I do not see.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"