The actions of the military-political leadership of the USSR, as we are persistently "prove" and what the representatives of the so-called "new look" at history Of the Great Patriotic War led to the “defeat of 1941 of the year” and to the “unjustifiable delay of the war” with the enemy, who, it turns out, was hopelessly inferior to us ... And we must slowly but surely come to the “realization” that the Great Patriotic War war is a completely unnecessary, extra page in our history. It should not have been at all! After all, this, you know, is nothing more than a “unreasonably protracted,” or rather, a sprawling Black Hole, which absorbed millions of “senseless victims.”
But everything was supposed to end, according to liberal “historians,” even in border battles in the summer of 1941. "Little blood" from our side, of course. But only the accompanying "evidence base" in such "historical research" is, as a rule, the usual "information noise", in the creation of which liberal propaganda has succeeded so much ...
I consider it expedient to refer in my article to the “classics”, whose example instructs and inspires the liberal revisionists of our past. And in this regard, the candidate more suitable than Viktor Suvorov (Rezun), it is difficult to imagine. Looking around the roots of the books I have for his authorship, I get “Suicide” from the shelf. The name is terrible, but in here, as in other Rezun's “works”, there is no one to be afraid, except for the country that our grandfathers mistakenly called the Motherland ...
But we will begin with the one whom one does not need to be afraid of - from Nazi Germany. As you know, in the German doctrine of "lightning war" ("blitzkrieg") the main emphasis was on the high mobility of troops during the offensive, which was intended primarily to deprive the enemy of the necessary time to organize and strengthen defense. This allowed us to achieve a favorable result for ourselves both in battles and in campaigns in general. Provided the necessary mobility for a “lightning war” numerous and modern self-propelled vehicles. The main striking force of the Blitzkrieg Tanksaccompanied trucks with food, fuel, engineering cars. Artillery tractors and vehicles for transporting manpower created a willingness to engage in battle directly from the march, because without the use of artillery and infantry from armored vehicles it is of little use. Including in the case of counter strikes from the enemy. In short, without proper self-propelled transport, a “lightning war” is nothing more than a phrase!
German troops who invaded the Soviet Union had half a million wheeled and half-tracked vehicles. One of the symbols of the German Blitzkrieg, the 3-ton truck, the Opel Blitz, was produced in Germany in large quantities from the 1937 year to its very defeat in World War II. This reliable, durable and easy to use car was well adapted for "service" in the army. By the way, one out of every four such trucks entering the army was all-wheel drive. In terms of the prevalence in the troops of the aggressor, it is impossible to ignore the "three-tonnets", which were produced for the needs of the Wehrmacht by the Ford car factory, built by the Americans back in Vesthafen, 1928, near Cologne. Among light trucks, I want to highlight the army multi-purpose off-road vehicles L2H143, which were manufactured by the Krupp company in Essen. These cars passed where lend-lease “Willis” and domestic GAZ-67 “Jeeps” appeared later in the Red Army. The engine, which stood on the L2H143, withstand severe frosts. This car was intended mainly for towing light artillery pieces and transporting motorized infantry. As for the half-track part of the transport of the Wehrmacht, here I consider it necessary to mention the tractor FAMO F3. It is the heaviest and most powerful semi-tracked tractor of the entire World War II. Created by the company "Farzoyg und Motoronbau" (FAMO) in Breslau. Produced with 1939 year. These vehicles were used to evacuate damaged armored vehicles from the battlefield, including medium tanks.
Of course, in terms of equipping the German army with trucks, the factories of the French Renault, the Czech Skoda, and the Italian Fiat helped.
In “Suicide”, the Wehrmacht appears not as a highly mechanized army, but as its antipode: “Blitzkrieg is a maneuverable war. The basis of German maneuverability in World War II is a pair of horses harnessed to a cart ”(Victor Suvorov,“ Suicide ”, ed. 2006, p. 132); "The basis of the German artillery thrust - horse" (p. 100); “The infantry formations of the German tank groups moved in the same way as the Egyptian infantry four thousand years ago — legs ... How did this so-called blitzkrieg differ from the Assyrian, Carthaginian, Roman, Spartan or Macedonian infantry strategically? What kind of blitzkrieg are we talking about if the commander of a tank group moved the tanks forward into operational depth, and behind it the infantry was dusting and the axles of infantry carts were creaking? ”(P. 131).
Well, we agree with the author: “If this was the case, then a blitzkrieg was impossible” (p. 132). It is also meekly to agree that Rezun understands the “blitzkrieg” doctrine much better than the entire German generals taken together, because Hitler’s strategists made it a “knight” a key figure of the blitzkrieg ”(p. 132).
What, I can not believe in such calculations? That you just "Suicide" did not read! And if they had read, they knew that practically the entire military-political “upper crust” of Nazi Germany was a bunch of fabulous fools: “... thinking people, capable of bearing responsibility for their actions, were very little in the top leadership of the Hitler state. Mostly - thoughtless performers. The main weakness of the nazi army and the state was the lack of professionalism in the top command echelon. It is completely incomprehensible why these people wore golden shoulder straps and marshal batons if many of them were not able to perform even the duties of a switchman ”(p. 51); “Hitler did not have a high school diploma. Hitler's generals and field marshals had certificates and diplomas, but in terms of mental development they were in no way higher than the demoniac model ”(p. 89).
Such a “collective guarantee”, which is very beneficial for the author, is obtained, or rather, circular dullness: no one interferes with anyone to show dementia - all fools “rule” all around! With a fool, as you know, the demand is small, and therefore the reader will not ask unnecessary questions about glaring contradictions. The glaring dullness will explain everything! The harmony of Rezun's compositions, achieved in this way, is really impressive! Oh, excuse me: not harmony, but “slender evidence base,” as seen by fans of Viktor Suvorov.
The entire state and military apparatus of the Third Reich, as you might guess, was a worthy creation of its stupid creators. And this, of course, left a corresponding imprint: “... chaos and slobliness flourished in the German army and state, which the light has not seen since its creation” (p. 67).
“Hitler’s immediate environment — adjutants (and their wives), secretaries, doctors, pilots, drivers, a photographer, guards — had an influence on him, and everyone was involved in public affairs, and everyone was pulling in his direction. The German socialists failed to realize Lenin’s dream of cooks, state leaders, but they were very far in this direction ”(p. 67). Using the well-established stereotypes about the word “adjutant”, which are inextricably linked with the image of such an “errand boy”, the great educator Viktor Suvorov writes (hereinafter referred to as): ground forces. It would seem that the adjutant is doing his job - he carries a briefcase, sharpens pencils, and the head of the main personnel department let him manage his complex and extremely responsible economy. But no. An adjutant receives and deals operational cards, carries them behind Hitler in a black briefcase, performs minor assignments, and in between cases assigns and dismisses generals from their posts, assigns military ranks, distributes cadres in troops, keeps records of years of service, awards and losses in a multimillion-dollar army ".
Adjutants in the German army were primarily personnel officers. Deal with relevant issues at the level of battalions, regiments, divisions, etc. Interestingly, in the location of the army, the adjutants, which is not very typical for pencil sharpeners, were reserve combat officers and could at any time be sent to replace the killed or wounded field commander. That is, they were the real military, and not just wore a uniform. Rudolf Schmundt, who went through the entire First World War, is no exception. Prior to becoming Hitler's personal adjutant in 1938, Schmundt held the position of chief of operations for the 18 Infantry Division headquarters, stationed in the city of Lignnitz.
In contrast to the stupidity of Hitler and his cliques, as well as the flawed state and military apparatus of the Third Reich, Viktor Suvorov in every way extols the Soviet system and Stalin in particular. At the same time insistently hinting that this is where she is, the abode of the world EVIL! Absolute EVIL, with all its being pointed to turning the world into hell! Stalin, as befits the devil in the flesh, is at the same time clever, cunning, cunning and ruthlessly calculating.
Because of all this, Nazism does not look like a threat to humanity, but only as a miserable parody of it. This brings to mind the following lines from Suicide: “Immediately - Minister of Propaganda Goebbels. It is customary to speak of him as a clever man ... Now we will pay attention only to his official title - the Minister of Propaganda. It is impossible to invent anything more stupid. Whatever he says, we know that this is propaganda. Any products of his department - propaganda. So officially called. How far he was to the Kremlin comrades! Compare: "Truth"! "TVNZ"! "True Ukraine"! "Cherkasy truth"! "Uryupinskaya truth"! Truth, truth, only truth alone, and nothing but truth! ”; “The main task of the devil is to prove to the misguided that there is no devil. This is the only way to get their souls ”(p. 57).
So this is why the Bolsheviks carried out an educational program in the country (having achieved the main successes in Stalin times)! To corrupt the people with all sorts of "truths"! Truly diabolical mnogohodovochku watch, gentlemen! And if we talk about how to kill people's souls, in order to turn their citizens into obedient tools, then the funny Nazis give the most obvious answer: you need to take away the spirituality of people! The guns must be soulless. It is necessary to replace the real human ideals with pseudo-ideals that have nothing in common with humanity. It is clear that the book “Mein Kampf” is unlikely to “get along” on the shelves of libraries with works by Goethe, Schiller, Mann and other humanists, because the latter will interfere with the spiritual “decapitation” of the masses, and therefore such “competition” had to be destroyed at any cost. Some works were proclaimed “Jewish”, based on what was written by Jews by origin (for example, the same Thomas Mann), a number of others were “rejected” as something completely irrelevant for the era, the beginning of which was proclaimed by the Nazis ... The fires from the books perfectly demonstrate the fear of a truly anti-human regime before the world spiritual heritage.
But Rezun prefers to stick his nose at something, as it seems to him, the most important and utterly indicative. More precisely, poke his readers into it.
Those who enjoy Rezun's harmony from book to book, that is, they are true, proven “Suvorov’s”, will strongly oppose me about my lack of confidence in the writings of the writer they respect. One of the most probable to me is the reproach that I ignore the author’s extensive "handling" of quotations from various sources - Soviet, foreign ... Doesn’t this speak in favor of objectivity?
Yes, various sources are indeed cited in Rezun's writings, but there is no way to talk about objectivity here! Viktor Suvorov, just on the basis of his divine will, decides who you can trust and who absolutely not! Words from some sources are regarded by our "researcher" as a blatant lie that does not withstand the test of his "well-formed evidence base", and words from others are bravely used.
The "enticing" authors are unceremoniously recorded as "enemies of the people" (using Rezun's vocabulary). It would seem that here, too, everything is extremely harmonious. But, alas, thunderstorms happen even in Rezunovsky “evidence-based” paradise ... “Comrade Stalin was generous. He gave Hitler the entire gold reserves of Germany along with her, with her cities, roads, factories and ports, museums and flea markets, along with a Berlin menagerie with his swans and bears. Stalin presented Germany with Hitler together with all its people: workers, peasants, labor intelligentsia, along with burgomasters and policemen, escorts and prisoners, chimney sweeps, doctors and violinists. Stalin gave Hitler power over Germany. “Without Stalin there would have been no Hitler, there would have been no Gestapo,” so in October 1936 of the year Leon Trotsky appreciated Stalin’s assistance to Hitler. No more and no less: without Stalin there would be no Hitler. Without Stalin’s help, Hitler would not have come to power in Germany ”(p. 24). The author uses the words of Trotsky as an authoritative confirmation of his own words, but later the page of Lev Davydovich suddenly appears to us to be quite different from the person who should be trusted: “... one socialist has broken his skull to another. The case is familiar. For all of us, gangsters are gangsters. But gangsters are different, they bite each other and often kill each other. So among the socialists. This is for all of us socialists - one color. And they are distinguished between each other for some completely inconspicuous nuances of each other ... ”(p. 26). In my opinion, Mr. Rezun, you are the bandits "for some completely inconspicuous nuances" you distinguish, looking for allies among them in the struggle for your TRUTH.
To be continued ...