The creation of territories of priority development as special enclaves with advantages for foreign business, a new wave of privatization, the commercialization of socially significant spheres purposefully lead the country to destabilization and disintegration. It remains to hope that the president, creating Rosgvardiyu, will be able to stop the activities of the "fifth column".
Today in Russia only the lazy does not talk about this danger. But something imperceptibly real steps. In any case, it is not known about any high-profile litigation related to the damage to our economy, defense or spiritual sphere.
“It is intended to create regions with particularly favorable conditions for a significant increase in the share of foreigners”
Rosgvardiya is being formed. Many associate its creation with the upcoming struggle with the "fifth column". Undoubtedly, the powers vested in the Rosguard, will more effectively prevent protests. Navalny will be difficult to count on the organization of riots with impunity. However, Navalny and others like him are only “field commanders” of a hostile army, which is deployed and operates in Russia. And the backbone of this force, apparently, remains invulnerable. Where are the headquarters?
To answer this question it is worth referring to stories. The most prominent representative of the "fifth column" is traditionally considered Quisling. His last name has become a household name. Quisling's crime is that, being the prime minister of Norway and at the same time an admirer of Hitler, he paralyzed the defensive potential of his country, disrupting the organized reflection of fascist aggression. As a result, key cities were occupied within a few days.
From February to Bialowieza
A closer example to Russia is the fall of autocracy in February of 1917. The Duma leaders and the highest generals became the organizers of the overthrow of Nicholas II. However, the main force and initiator of the dismantling of autocracy was the business elite of that time. Among the organizers of the anti-monarchist coup are Guchkov, Rodzianko, Chief of the General Staff Alekseev and other influential persons, including members of the royal family. They worked closely with representatives of the British establishment, in particular with the staff of the British Embassy. The latter actively supported the activities of anti-imperial forces in Russia. The protests of the proletariat were considered as the most important element of the scenario and were crucially caused artificially at the right moment. Although the tsarist power itself created the prerequisites for the fall of autocracy in Russia: social tension, as a result of impoverishment of the people and unpopular war, reached its limit, at the same time no measures were taken to curb the antimonarchist front and open theft in the elite.
Another example is the collapse of the socialist camp and the USSR. If someone thinks that this was done by the “damned democrats” together with the “all-powerful CIA”, then he is greatly mistaken. Party bosses entered into the “Belovezhskaya collusion”. But it's not about them. The agreement was approved by the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. Were it not for the ratification, the Belovezhsk agreements would remain an empty piece of paper. But Gorbachev then still had full (or almost complete) control over the USSR Armed Forces. But the ratification took place - the Soviet Union was destroyed. At the same time, all those who, at a reasonable age, found the USSR, remember that the main social problems were created by the highest party farm and general membership - starting with the “struggle against drunkenness” meaningless and embittering the people, and ending with the open sabotage of ensuring the life of the population.
There are plenty of such examples in history. The main thing in them is that the notorious "fifth column" did not go out into the street. She possessed large powers within the state existing at that time and destroyed it using her administrative resource. Understanding this simple fact against the background of complete invulnerability of the highest echelon of the modern Russian government from law enforcement and intelligence agencies makes you look more closely: is the fight with the “fifth column” really being fought and not simulated? And in what its activity in modern Russia is shown.
Informational activity of representatives of the liberal opposition does not count. All their speeches are not perceived as serious in the mass of the population. Yes, and these figurant themselves with the reputation of buzoterov and pogromists are unattractive in the eyes of the absolute majority. Their rating, by their own estimates, does not exceed units or even fractions of a percent. Much more important to look at the liberal agents in government.
Thor in law
The start probably comes from those actions that directly affect the integrity of the country. In this regard, the law “On the territories of advanced socio-economic development in the Russian Federation” (No. 473-FZ from 29.12.2014) is very interesting. Formally, the idea is tempting: to create special regions that will become the locomotives of the entire economy. However, a closer reading reveals interesting nuances.
The article 17 states: a special legal regime for business and other activities in the territory of advanced socio-economic development (TOR) provides preferential rental rates (Section 2), priority connection to the infrastructure (Section 5), exemption from customs duties (Section 7), property tax and land (p. 8). That is, the budget will receive little.
Another law (No. 519-FZ from 31.12.2014) establishes that in these areas "obtaining permits to attract and use foreign workers is not required." And “a work permit for a foreign citizen who is employed for employment by a resident of a territory of advanced socio-economic development is issued without taking into account quotas ...” That is, conditions are created for the unrestricted migration of foreign citizens to TOR, which can become very large-scale.
Article 28 of this law establishes that the decision on the compulsory alienation of land plots (seizure) and immovable property located on them "is made by an authorized federal agency at the request of the management company." In other words, in these regions the right of ownership is actually abolished - the land and property of the Russian owners can be selected.
Even this brief analysis shows that creation of regions with particularly favorable conditions for a significant increase in the share of foreign population is assumed in the country compared to Russia as a whole — essentially, enclaves of other states with legal regime and de facto self-government that is attractive to foreign business. Under favorable conditions, TORs become centers of separatism. Whether there will be an economic effect or not - another question, in any case, the treasury will receive little. But the legislative basis for the dismemberment of Russia has been laid.
A very interesting decision is to launch a new wave of privatization. First of all, attention is drawn to its focus. Among those privatized are called Rosneft, Bashneft, Transneft, Alrosa, Sberbank, Aeroflot, Russian Railways, Sovcomflot, Rostelecom and other major state-owned companies. Partial sale of defense enterprises is possible. In particular, "Helicopters of Russia" and Uralvagonzavod. Privatization will also affect a part of enterprises engaged in the production of basic products, for example, high-tech ones. With regard to Russian Helicopters, Industry and Trade Minister Denis Manturov pointed out that a strategic investor from Russia could be sold up to 49 percent of shares, and a foreign investor - 25 percent. The possibility of selling a quarter of Uralvagonzavod. With regard to the other campaigns mentioned, it is argued that the controlling stake should remain with the state.
An analysis of the privatization plan raises several questions at once.
First, it is well known that privatization is generally considered expedient in cases when companies are inefficient under state management. All of these are very successful and are the basis of our key sectors of the economy: the oil industry, the transport and communication infrastructure of the country, and the defense industry. That is, from this point of view, these enterprises should not be privatized in any way: they replenish the budget and, if they are sold, a significant part of their welding will go to private investors. It is worth reminding that this year state companies are allowed to spend up to 50 percent of net profit on dividends.
Secondly, all defense enterprises, transport and communication infrastructure make a key contribution to the country's defense. Once privatized, even if only partially, they will become limitedly controlled by the state, which will have an extremely negative effect on the defense capability of the country as a whole.
Thirdly, there will be a question about the observance of secrecy, especially in the field of new technologies. With a significant share (albeit not a controlling stake), a private investor will claim a place on the board of directors of an enterprise, the right to influence its technical and commercial policy. And this means that private individuals, including foreigners, will have access to information constituting a secret: the latest technologies, directions for the supply of weapons and military equipment, agreements with our allies.
Fourthly, there is a high risk that privatized enterprises producing high-tech products will be fully or partially converted technologically (to other products) or commercially (to other markets). The history of previous privatizations shows: no prior agreement is an insurance against such consequences.
Finally, it should be particularly noted that the creation of any complex technology, both military and civil, implies the inclusion of many different enterprises in the production cycle. Their coordinated work is ensured only by national regulation. Privatization excludes enterprises from this system or introduces significant restrictions on state influence, which drastically reduces the possibility of consolidating the company's resources on solving the key tasks of restoring the country's economy, especially in the high-tech sphere.
Thus, the formally useful idea of privatization, which will make it possible to patch holes in the budget in the short run, in the near future will result in huge losses for the country, both financial and technological, which is especially dangerous. Maybe the initiators of privatization do not understand this? Of course, understand. In this context, the information in the media about the meeting of Prime Minister Medvedev with the US Ambassador to discuss privatization in Russia was a very alarming signal. And how many such meetings were held at a lower level and without media coverage?
The social tension in the society pursued by education and health care policies, in fact, aimed at their elitarization and cutting off the overwhelming majority of the population from quality services, noticeably increases.
There are many similar examples, but you shouldn’t focus on them. The main thing is that there is an activity that clearly strikes serious blows to the economic potential of the country and encroaches on its territorial integrity. The sequester of socially significant budget items (talking about the crisis and the allocation of large funds for the rearmament of the army) creates social and political tensions in the country. Against this background, data on multimillion and even billions in incomes of individuals of the Russian establishment are published. Everything looks like a targeted preparation of a social explosion in the country. It is perfectly clear that no bulk can carry out such actions. In reality, only modern Guchkovs, Rodzianki, Gorbachevs and the like are capable of this. They constitute the Russian “fifth column” of modernity, which, to the greatest regret, lives and thrives, quietly and methodically preparing a social explosion in our country. It is significant that the main figures of the “fifth column” are strong supporters of the spirit and culture of the Anglo-Saxon world, are associated with it economically ... As in February 1917 of the year.
So far no one is trying to stop this destructive activity of openly hostile to the president and Russia as a whole, especially in the power of big business associated with the West, as well as the media serving them. The “fifth column” in Russia feels at ease. However, it would be desirable to hope that the president, having created Rosgvardiyu, will be able to stop the activities of the “fifth column” of the West and prevent the social explosion organized by it.