Syrian "Pechora" able to bring down "stealth" -planes

The Syrian army’s Pechora-2M air defense system remains ominous weapons against various aerial means of destruction. Thanks to the improvements made in Russia, the outdated system, which was used in the Middle East as early as 1970, has found a second life and is now capable of shooting down airplanes built using Stealth technology, writes Messenger of Mordovia.

It is noted that “modified missiles were able to“ catch up ”with targets flying at speeds in 1000 m / s at altitudes from 20 m to 25 km, at a distance of 28 km.”

According to the author, “modern digital technologies have been used in the complex, which has significantly improved the ability to detect attacking aircraft.”

In addition, "for the hidden version of the work introduced thermal imaging channel, which allows, without revealing itself, detect the enemy," said the publication.

The advantages of the complex include its mobility. “Thanks to the Minsk MZKT-8021, which can travel at a speed of 40-60 km / h, the air defense men are able to change positions in a very short time and move away from retaliation,” the author writes.

According to the "Bulletin", at the disposal of the Syrian air defense are 12 such complexes.

Comments

[techie]

NATO, extinguish the light, go home - RUSSIAN GO!

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: techie

NATO, extinguish the light, go home - RUSSIAN GO!

URRRAAAAAAAAA, URRRAAAAAAAAA, URRRAAAAAAAA.
There is only one problem, I have not yet heard that the Syrians would bring down at least one NATO or Israel aircraft.

[Pereira]

But they boasted, with the expectation that people pick.

[comprochikos]

Do not shoot down, not because they can not.

[Koshak]

Quote from comprochikos

Do not shoot down, not because they can not.

Just add a spoonful of your bowel movements? Look at TTD "Pechora" - range 28 km. In NATO and Israel, they are also not stupid to fly into the zone of the air defense system.

[Comrade Schucher]

Quote: Koshak

Take a look at TTD "Pechora" - range 28 km. In NATO and Israel, they are also not stupid to fly into the zone of the air defense system.

The meaning of your remark is not entirely clear ...
... range of 28 km, this is just for fools - that would not fly closer

Quote from comprochikos

Do not shoot down, not because they can not.

And by the way, it’s the same to you ... how can you get it if you don’t fly into the affected area?

[Pereira]

When the result is presented, then we will admire.

[andj61]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

There is only one problem, I have not yet heard that the Syrians would bring down at least one NATO or Israel aircraft.

The Pechora-2M air defense system is a modernization of the old Soviet stationary S-125 air defense system in relation to new conditions and on a new element base. And this SAM is already mobile. And for Syria, this is not a weapon of everyday use, they are unlikely to ever use it at all, except against the Arab regimes. If the S-125 has at least one victory against the old invisibles (the Yugoslav conflict), then the modernized air defense system also has chances against modern planes, but not in the Syrian air defense: the conflict with NATO, and with Israel, the Syrian army does not will endure, and will not start - it is akin to suicide.
There was already an article about the Pechora-2M air defense system at VO.http: //topwar.ru/36487-zrk-pechora-2m-vtoraya-zhizn-s-125.html

[Koshak]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

There is only one problem, I have not yet heard that the Syrians would bring down at least one NATO or Israel aircraft.

Our S-400s in Syria also did not shoot down a single NATO aircraft. So what? According to your reasoning, it turns out that the S-400 is also a problem and they are good for nothing?

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Koshak

Our S-400s in Syria also did not shoot down a single NATO aircraft. So what?

And the fact that NATO planes and Israeli planes did not bomb the suburbs.

Quote: Koshak

According to your reasoning, it turns out that the S-400 is also a problem, and are they good for nothing?

And your fruit and deep fantasies

[Kaiten]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

And the fact that NATO planes and Israeli planes did not bomb the suburbs.

Well, the plane of the Russian NATO country in Syria shot down - quite a legitimate reason to answer.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Kaiten

Well, the plane of the Russian NATO country in Syria shot down - quite a legitimate reason to answer.

They shot down the Turks, and we beat the Amer’s, should there be an answer?
Something Turkish aircraft evaporated from Syria.

[bif]

There is only one problem, I have not yet heard that the Syrians would bring down at least one NATO or Israel aircraft.

http://maxpark.com/community/3782/content/3652323

http://www.iarex.ru/articles/52583.html

[Professor]

Quote: bif

http://maxpark.com/community/3782/content/3652323

http://www.iarex.ru/articles/52583.html

C-300 turned Israeli aircraft into dust.
Only not in dust, but in gas. Therefore, there are no material evidence of such a significant event.

[ishty]

Probably not in time - overallnews.ru/i/1289210

Israeli Air Force aircraft strike at Hezbollah convoy carrying a batch of weapons from Syria to Lebanon

[Andrey K]

"Pechora" showed itself during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, when the invisible plane F-117 was shot down
Serbs didn't know he was "invisible"

[Comrade Schucher]

Quote: Andrey K

Serbs didn't know he was "invisible"

Serbs in general are guys with brains, they invented false radar installations from microwave ovens. God knows how many bombs and missiles the mericosa have kidnapped on the bombing of household appliances.
The Merikos were lucky there, only due to the fact that Yugoslavia was a small country, and that they pounced on it in a crowd, and so to hell, what would they do.

[uskrabut]

and the land fighters did not dare to land operations. And how did the Serbs wait!

[My doctor]

Quote: Andrey K

Serbs didn't know he was "invisible" laughing

Serbian air defense forces were unable to protect civilian and military installations from air attacks.

[ilya_oz]

They were able to shoot down the F-117 when it was within visual range. And so they could not protect the country.

[Andrey K]

Read how the F-117 was shot down.
Respect colleagues and do not talk nonsense.
What the heck is visual visibility: the usual F-117A flight altitude is 10-12 km., Speed ​​is up to 993 km / h ...
Subsequently, Iraq and Libya were not able to protect the country, with equipment and army strength an order of magnitude higher. Assad would not have defended the country if our VKS had not arrived in time ...

[sivuch]

What is glazed visibility at 9pm?

[cosmos132]

He did it - Zoltan Dani

[dmi.pris1]

This complex has proven itself well in Yugoslavia. Moreover, now it has become mobile.

[33 Watcher]

I am not special in air defense systems, but if they discover at least 1 out of two, it’s already good. And if they hit the same way they discover, then it's generally wonderful!

[icy]

Likelihood of defeat: 0,51 (30km) -0,98 (20km).

[andj61]

Quote: icas

Likelihood of defeat: 0,51 (30km) -0,98 (20km).

Is this when firing one SAM or a dozen? And how many rockets are produced? And what is the opposition? And what are the characteristics of the target - altitude-speed, maneuvering, etc.? Are there mountains or other radio shading?
Too many unknowns to give a specific probability of defeat ...

[cap]

"According to Vestnik, 12 such complexes are at the disposal of the Syrian air defense systems."

I don’t eat popcorn fundamentally, I’ll just fry the seeds and be patient.
Turks feel sorry for the course. Go to the site a couple of spies sitting.
As you sneeze toward the Americans, minus flies in the middle of the night

[Alexez]

12 complexes are about nothing. They can be gouged with the help of ARM from distances exceeding the "Pechora" radius by two times. Rather, it is a symbol of the fact that not only Russians in Syria can have a star-striped tail and set them on fire if anything.

[In100gram]

What a reserve for modernization !!!

[exumer]

Great news, that’s what deep modernization means.

[dsm100]

A large reserve for modernization is certainly good, but it slows down the development of new systems.

[Urgent]

As one of the elements of the air defense system, this complex can undoubtedly still serve. But as independent units - in the event of the beginning of aerial aggression - they will be destroyed in the shortest time without the possibility of a retaliatory strike. IMHO.

[RedBaron]

Pecher not Pecher, but Israel gouged Assad's nuclear reactor and did not notice the air defense, that is, the air defense did not notice at all ...

[Professor]

Quote: RedBaron

Pecher not Pecher, but Israel gouged Assad's nuclear reactor and did not notice the air defense, that is, the air defense did not notice at all ...

Arab Media: Israeli Air Force strikes weapons column in Lebanon
The column, which became the target of the attack, was located near the Lebanese city of Anjar, located near the Syrian border. According to these reports, a Lebanese radar station and an air defense system were destroyed by an air strike.
publication time: May 10 2016, 21: 41

[yushch]

Quote: RedBaron

Pecher not Pecher, but Israel gouged Assad's nuclear reactor and did not notice the air defense, that is, the air defense did not notice at all ...

You will excuse me, of course, but if someone had gouged someone's nuclear reactor in the Middle East, then a large area there would have shone with an unhealthy light at night. As far as I know, there is no information on radiation-charged zones in the BV. I would be grateful if you confirm the opposite with links to serious sources

[miru mir]

Wiki is a serious enough source?

[yushch]

For you, maybe. For me, a report by the IAEA or another serious organization about a high radiation background and an environmental disaster in the "area of ​​the destroyed reactor" is enough.

[miru mir]

6 September 2007 The Israeli Air Force bombed an object in Syria, which was supposedly a nuclear reactor under construction. [45] Representatives of the American intelligence community said in this regard that it was unlikely that the bombed object was a nuclear reactor. [46] The Western press claimed that Israel’s attack is a reaction to the arrival in Syria of cargo from North Korea, which could be a reactor for creating nuclear weapons. [47] 24 On October 2007, the American Institute of Science and International Security issued a report in which The rum facility in the Syrian governorate of Deir ez-Zor was described as a putative nuclear reactor. The report also suggested similarities between the alleged Syrian reactor and the DPRK nuclear center in Yongbyon, but noted that it was too early to draw final conclusions. [48] On 25 on October 2007 of the year, Western media reported that the ruins of the bombed site were completely dismantled and taken out . [49]
***
The IAEA is not always greeted) And the reactor, as I understand it, was just being built. This is not the point ...

[yushch]

Yes, you're right, that’s not the point. As far as I know officially, Israel never confirms this kind of action. It turns out that hypothetically someone bombed something, and at the output we get loud statements about the destruction of a nuclear reactor, which by the way is not confirmed by anyone. No need to try to wishful thinking, you have to be more modest and people will reach for you.

[miru mir]

Think as you like

[Verdun]

Syrian "Pechora" able to bring down "stealth" -planes

Like any other anti-aircraft complex with visual targeting equipment. After all, the optical visibility of "stealth" has not yet been canceled. As for location detection, the S-125 complex can be connected to a wide variety of remote radars, with the help of which the missile is guided and corrected. And in this case, everything will depend on the capabilities of the radar.

[sivuch]

Allah is with you - what are such various remote radars for guidance and correction?
SOTsKs were different, i.e., detection stations In the Union, the standard was R-15, since it is low-altitude, like the SAM itself. In Yugoslavia, the P-12 and P-18 meters were also used as SOCs, despite their low accuracy and long coagulation time. Over a meter long, they saw better invisible aircraft and were not afraid of PRR.
And for the guidance is used CHP - as I understand it, it was modernized.
And the Syrians are unlikely to bring anyone down, because there are the capabilities of technology and the technical culture of the exploiters.
As for the reactor under construction, there is a completely reasonable technical explanation, but here, anyway, everything will slide into politics

[Ros 56]

The main thing that they are capable of, but the old or modern ones do not matter. The MiG-29 also made its first flight in 1977, piloted by Fedotov, and it is still NATO pilots, those who have a little understanding of how they are afraid of fire.

[cosmos132]

Contact - 1983 - Syria, 1999 - Yugoslavia
He was a starter.