Military Review

Karakaev: Western missile defense practically does not reduce the capabilities of the Strategic Missile Forces

25
In the Russian Federation, work is constantly underway to “improve the means of overcoming” EuroPRO, while the Americans are making a lot of efforts to strengthen it, reports RIA News Post Commander RVSN Sergey Karakaeva.


Karakaev: Western missile defense practically does not reduce the capabilities of the Strategic Missile Forces


“Undoubtedly, the work on improving the means of overcoming the missile defense by our ICBMs is actively carried out at the present time. This is due to the fact that the United States does not stop at what has been achieved and continue to improve its missile defense system, including with the deployment of its elements in Europe, ”said the colonel-general.

According to him, "when developing new missile systems, special attention is paid to the problem of overcoming the missile defense system."

“The new missile systems of the Strategic Missile Forces have increased capabilities to overcome the existing and promising global missile defense system. This is achieved both by reducing the section for overclocking the ICBM, and by means of new types of combat equipment with an unpredictable flight trajectory, and due to new means of overcoming missile defense, "
told Karakaev.

Therefore, despite the fact that the United States periodically strengthens the European missile defense segment, this does not reduce the combat capabilities of the Strategic Missile Forces.

“Threats for the Strategic Missile Forces by the European missile defense segment are limited and currently do not lead to a critical reduction in the combat capabilities of the troops,” the general said.
Photos used:
RIA News. Sergey Pyatakov
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bad
    bad 10 May 2016 17: 39
    +10
    “Threats for the Strategic Missile Forces by the European missile defense segment are limited and currently do not lead to a critical reduction in the combat capabilities of the troops,” the general said.
    .. God forbid if so ... but still, the potential of ABM adversary should be taken more seriously .. they are also not fools .. even though we are not bastards .... repeat
    1. cniza
      cniza 10 May 2016 17: 43
      +8
      Thank God, here we have saved and increased.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. poquello
      poquello 10 May 2016 17: 44
      +1
      Quote: bad
      “Threats for the Strategic Missile Forces by the European missile defense segment are limited and currently do not lead to a critical reduction in the combat capabilities of the troops,” the general said.
      .. God bless the Kli so .. all the same about the potential of the adversary should be taken seriously .. it happens .. repeat

      this happens when diarrhea is eaten, but they are indignant at the missile defense system for etiquette so that they don’t get rude
      1. CORNET
        CORNET 10 May 2016 17: 48
        +5
        "After us, silence ..." The Strategic Missile Forces of Russia can provide anywhere in the world! Our design engineers did not sit idly by .. Thank you!
        1. poquello
          poquello 10 May 2016 18: 19
          +3
          Quote: CORNET
          "After us, silence ..." The Strategic Missile Forces of Russia can provide anywhere in the world! Our design engineers did not sit idly by .. Thank you!

          Of course, thank them, personally, I have no doubt that half the potential will fly to them exactly where it is aimed.
  2. ALEXX.
    ALEXX. 10 May 2016 17: 40
    +4
    It is good that we went a few steps ahead from NATO.
    1. poquello
      poquello 10 May 2016 17: 46
      +1
      Quote: ALEXX.
      It is good that we went a few steps ahead from NATO.

      still nato would take us a few steps away
    2. sever.56
      sever.56 10 May 2016 17: 58
      +3
      Quote: ALEXX.
      we have gone a few steps ahead of NATO.


      I think it is wrong to say that we “A FEW steps have left NATO. We are ahead, but not a few steps, but a couple. But these steps are very significant.
      Only Americans have serious nuclear weapons and their carriers, just like missile defense systems. NATO is a military-political alliance that is completely dependent on the states and everything is done according to their rules.
      The good news is that our missile defense systems are now such that the probability of hitting our missiles has grown significantly, compared to recent times. In combination with our electronic warfare systems (which are indeed much more effective and more perfect than the western ones), we can say that now we are several years ahead of the states in this type of armament.
  3. Dezinto
    Dezinto 10 May 2016 17: 41
    +6
    Maybe we will check? :)

    1. poquello
      poquello 10 May 2016 18: 12
      +2
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Maybe we will check? :)


      Well, what kind of people are you, summer has come, the bathing season, what the hell was winter, do you have a pool at home?
  4. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 10 May 2016 17: 42
    +4
    "... the US periodically strengthens the European segment ..."
    I, too, strengthen my "segment": well, there are celery, parsley, pine nuts, honey, freshwater fish caviar, crustaceans, there, all sorts of ... But, I know for sure, two happy 38-year-old faces, they can still have breakfast for me cook .., and, here is the third-ALA !!! crying It is necessary to soberly assess their capabilities ..!
    1. AleksPol
      AleksPol 10 May 2016 19: 55
      0
      However . If I were a sultan I would have ... smile
  5. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 10 May 2016 17: 42
    +2
    And how did their AIDs stick around all our borders like food cockroaches. But our submarines and strategic missile carriers for the adversary are really a threat.
    1. demoniac1666
      demoniac1666 10 May 2016 17: 47
      +2
      Quote: Alexander 3
      . But our submarines and strategic missile carriers for the adversary are really a threat.

      Fiercely plus !!!!! +++++ hi
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 10 May 2016 17: 58
      +5
      Quote: Alexander 3
      And how did their AIDs stick around all our borders like food cockroaches. But our submarines and strategic missile carriers for the adversary are really a threat.


      Here is the answer. wink
      1. cap
        cap 10 May 2016 20: 10
        +2
        Quote: NEXUS
        Here is the answer. wink


        Hey, Lieutenant Colonel Lomovoy! good
  6. demoniac1666
    demoniac1666 10 May 2016 17: 44
    +2
    We need to put more missiles on the submarines, then we will not care about missile defense. I understand that the missile defense issue is more political than strategic. Submarines with nuclear weapons on board will control any missile defense. Need to invest more money in the development of the submarine fleet. I.M.Kh.O. hi
  7. kotvov
    kotvov 10 May 2016 17: 52
    +1
    observed at the end of the 80s the start of ballistics, there is something in my doubt that their IJIS will be able to intercept. I have the feeling that I was sitting in a rocket.
  8. beer-youk
    beer-youk 10 May 2016 17: 58
    +2
    Quote: Alexander 3
    And how did their AJIS stick to all our borders like food cockroaches.


    It is appropriate to recall their law regarding advertising. If the product is 20% consistent with the advertising data, then the advertising parameters are considered real. This fully applies to the IJIS, as, however, to almost all of their military developments over the past 20 years.
  9. weksha50
    weksha50 10 May 2016 18: 07
    +2
    ""when developing new missile systems, special attention is paid to the problem of overcoming the missile defense system"" ...

    Back in the late 80s, when this whole race for "Star Wars" was going on and the Amers were boasting about their supposedly "space umbrella", our military scientists and scientists and production workers of the military-industrial complex worked hard to overcome this umbrella (ABM) and achieved successes that practically the success of the Amers ...

    I hope that even now our scientists and the military-industrial complex have not blundered ... The work has remained, the people, for the most part, too, have only to finance and develop ... What, I think, is being done at the present stage ...
  10. then
    then 10 May 2016 18: 19
    +2
    A missile defense system is, by and large, needed to repel a preemptive strike. And with a retaliatory strike, the missile defense is first suppressed and then the intended goals are methodically hit, so that the bona fide good would not be wasted.
  11. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 10 May 2016 18: 24
    +5
    they were also asked not to deploy missile defense in Europe, they pretended to be deaf. Now Europe is a big ashtray for radioactive butts!
  12. zurbagan63
    zurbagan63 10 May 2016 19: 12
    +2
    Great!
    1. cap
      cap 10 May 2016 20: 16
      +3
      Quote: zurbagan63
      Great!

      Quote: avg-mgn
      they were also asked not to deploy missile defense in Europe, they pretended to be deaf. Now Europe is a big ashtray for radioactive butts!


      I think that you shouldn't mess with an ashtray, give a "smoker" with a cigar in the teeth, a plane tree will fall into the ashtray.
      The Anglo-Saxons chose the old strategy, though they forgot that the Katyushas were only in our parade.
      All ss..ki on sight!
      Strategic Missile Forces
      startstart
  13. Grim Reaper
    Grim Reaper 10 May 2016 21: 41
    +1
    Quote: cniza
    Thank God, here we have saved and increased.

    A couple of thousand warheads against 20k, railroad oh, submarines almost oh, in the ranks of the 70s-80s vehicles. What have we saved and increased? The hope remains that what can break through the pro is still considered unacceptable damage ....
  14. Ros 56
    Ros 56 11 May 2016 05: 37
    +1
    The main thing is to cause a small headache in small stripes with big forces and corresponding expenses.