The mine option "Yars" will be delivered Tatishchevskaya and Kozelsk divisions

33
In the Strategic Missile Forces, the process of re-equipment to the new YARS missile systems, which are delivered to the troops in both mobile and mine variants, continues MIC Post Commander RVSN Sergey Karakaeva.

Installation of a unified command post of the 15В242 complex of the Yars-M ICBM of the mine base in the missile regiment of the Kozelsk division

“The Yars missile system is assigned a primary role. Practically all mobile-based missile divisions will be reequipped to this complex, as well as Tatischevskaya (partially) and Kozelsk missile divisions, where Yars will be supplied in a mine variant, ”Karakayev said.

According to him, “by the end of the 2021 of the year, the Yars RK will comprise approximately half of the combat personnel of the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia”.

The general noted that “in the plans for re-equipping the troops, the priority is the task of maintaining the group, ensuring that the strategic nuclear forces of Russia guarantee the fulfillment of the diverse tasks of nuclear deterrence.”

“Such a task is largely solved by introducing modern missile systems into the combat strength and giving the group a fundamentally new qualitative properties to counter existing and future military technical threats,” he added.

“Successful implementation of rearmament measures will increase the share of modern missile systems in the Strategic Missile Forces grouping from 56% this year to 70% by January 1 2018 year and in 2022 year to 100%,” concluded Karakayev.
  • http://gu5.spetsstroy.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    10 May 2016 17: 13
    Our answer to Chamberlain, i.e. this, like him ... Obama with the company !!! good
  2. 0
    10 May 2016 17: 17
    Correct me, missilemen, if not right. But hasn't the mine option outlived its usefulness? Moreover, all of them are known to our "partners", and the coordinates of the mines have long been in computers for the first strike? Isn't it better to develop mobile? Revive the Nuclear Train?
    1. +5
      10 May 2016 17: 27
      Quote: Burieway
      Correct me, rocketeers, if not right. But hasn't the mine option become obsolete?

      Not outdated. Only a direct hit of an ulcer in a pu can destroy it. In addition, the mines are always covered by air defense and have several degrees of protection. And most importantly .. The launch of the ICBM on the other side will be immediately detected. About 5-6 minutes is to make a decision and press the start button.
    2. +4
      10 May 2016 17: 37
      Quote: Burieway
      But hasn't the mine option become obsolete?

      The USA has 450 mines with Minuteman-3 missiles; there were projects for the construction of mobile complexes and trains, but they were not developed.
      1. 0
        10 May 2016 18: 01
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        , there were projects for the construction of mobile complexes and trains, but they were not developed.

        I heard that the infrastructure does not allow, although the rotation is being dragged from the mine to the mines.
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        The USA has 450 mines with Minuteman-3 missiles,

        So on combat duty they have a third opinion.
        1. 0
          11 May 2016 09: 35
          Quote: marshes
          I heard that the infrastructure does not allow

          That's right. Railways are private, and there is no single network as such with a single control. Organizationally not feasible
    3. +5
      10 May 2016 17: 58
      Quote: Burieway
      But hasn't the mine option become obsolete?



      Far from it ... It is better protected than mobile ones, and it has the highest degree of readiness for launch than mobile ones ... The same applies to the BZHRK ... Although Amers were afraid of him, they also had problems with him .. .

      So - together - mine and mobile complexes are the inevitability of a strike ...

      And when Sarma gets on the database - so he only has one way - to the mine ...

      And the debate here is, which is better - missiles in silos or mobile - these are disputes about anything ...
      Each complex has its advantages and disadvantages ...

      And here we must be glad that by the 20th year in the Strategic Missile Forces all the complexes will be 100% new ...
      Which causes the problem and insomnia to some people ...
      1. +2
        10 May 2016 18: 24
        At the expense of mobile PU.
        The bro told us for some time they were leaving the places of deployment. Then, the cars started back. The commander, looking at his watch, said SATELLITE.
        So the flight time of enemy satellites is no secret.
        1. +2
          10 May 2016 19: 16
          Quote: marshes
          So the flight time of enemy satellites is no secret.

          The enemy can create a large constellation of satellites so the base will always be under the gun.
          It would be possible to place the Yars missile in the KamAZ semi-trailer and patrol along the tracks, no one will suspect it there. But this requires a lighter missile, something like the RS-26 Frontier.
          1. 0
            10 May 2016 19: 35
            Quote: Lt. air force reserve
            It would be possible to place the Yars missile in the KamAZ semi-trailer and patrol along the tracks, no one will suspect it there. But this requires a lighter missile, something like the RS-26 Frontier.

            Bro, he told me that the locations and possible routes for the "Taiga wanderers" are not secret for the opponents. Sometimes it is stupid and stupid to build concrete roads that lead nowhere or from where. smile
            The BZHRK also appreciates submarine rocket-bombers, which he considers to be a real weapon of retaliation.
            FROM BZHRK, he was delighted with the "pinnipeds", not the faculty.
            And so served where the river Zeya.
          2. 0
            10 May 2016 20: 18
            Quote: Lt. air force reserve
            It would be possible to place the Yars missile in the KamAZ semi-trailer and patrol along the tracks, no one will suspect it there. But this requires a lighter missile, something like the RS-26 Frontier.

            By the way, your road infrastructure will not allow this.
            Kamaz barely pulls 40 tons. After trips to China, 60 tons of cargo, the engine is sorted out. So we have real long-distance battles on Scania, Volvo and other types of foreign equipment.
            40-60 tons, "intestines climb out of the asphalt", your roads are colline and "mushrooms" - from sudden braking in the heat.
            So the BZHRK and submarine missile carriers, more attention needs to be paid to them. Although I as a car owner will vote for the road. smile
            1. +3
              10 May 2016 21: 54
              Quote: marshes
              By the way, your road infrastructure will not allow this.
              Kamaz barely pulls 40 tons. After trips to China, 60 tons of cargo, the engine is sorted out. So we have real long-distance battles on Scania, Volvo and other types of foreign equipment.

              For trucks, axle load (according to Russian standards) varies from 7t to 11t. Let's say a triaxial American pulls a 13.6 wagon that also has three axles. Every axle of a truck - 7.5t minimum = 22.5t per trailer truck. The tractor 8t front axle 15t rear trolley = 23t. Total maximum coupling weight is 45.5. What minus the deadweight of the hitch gives a load capacity of about 28t. As uvaz there kamaz carry 40t .. it’s not even about the engine. The wheel in the spark has a lifting capacity of 2.8 tons. On one axis - 11 + tons. If you load more wheels will explode like holiday balls.
              Now for PGRK .. Its total weight is more than 100 tons .. with 12 axles, the load on each can be 10 tons, and given the size of the wheels, the specific pressure will be slightly higher than that of a passenger car.
              So the asphalt can withstand them without problems and they will pass on the ground .., and not only on dry ground.
              1. 0
                10 May 2016 22: 20
                Quote: dvina71
                How uvaz there kamaz carry 40t .. it's not even about the engine

                Mmm. Kamensam Khan, pots burn out, piston in general ... zvizdets.
                Quote: dvina71
                The wheel in the spark has a lifting capacity of 2.8 tons. On one axis - 11 + tons. If you load more wheels will explode like holiday balls.

                In short, a neighbor has a fleet of ten cars. all from Europe. Cargo is loaded with what is from Europe, what is from Asia, Kamaz-it immediately says, Super MAZ is not bad. But cars. I climbed into Renault, damn it, one room apartment on wheels. I’m in Auta. Rather, in Ahuya.
                Prior to this, the forest with Russia was pulling with him for itself.
                Quote: dvina71
                Now for PGRK .. Its total weight is more than 100 tons .. with 12 axles, the load on each can be 10 tons, and given the size of the wheels, the specific pressure will be slightly higher than that of a passenger car.
                So the asphalt can withstand them without problems and they will pass on the ground .., and not only on dry ground.

                So the above advised "tare" under the wagon? What kind of wagon will it be?
                Roads, in the year 12 from China to Europe, agreed to build a concrete block, and that. We are already off of our site in the fall. you didn’t move further to Orenburg.
                Concrete track with asphalt pavement, continuous concreting method.
            2. 0
              12 May 2016 23: 11
              Quote: marshes
              By the way, your road infrastructure will not allow this.
              Kamaz barely pulls 40 tons. After trips to China, 60 tons of cargo, the engine is sorted out. So we have real long-distance battles on Scania, Volvo and other types of foreign equipment.
              40-60 tons, "intestines climb out of the asphalt", your roads are colline and "mushrooms" - from sudden braking in the heat.
              So the BZHRK and submarine missile carriers, more attention needs to be paid to them. Although I as a car owner will vote for the road.

              There was a project of a mobile complex based on a semi-trailer, called "Courier", the United States was developing the Midgetman missile.
              Our missile of the Courier complex (15Zh59 rocket index) had a starting weight of 15 tons
              "The Kurier rocket turned out to be uniquely compact. Its length did not exceed 11,2 m, and the maximum hull diameter was 1,36 m. In the early stages of the project, it was supposed to" keep within "the launch weight at the level of 15 tons, but later it had to be increased up to 17 tons. Throwing weight - about 500 kg. The 15Ж59 rocket was supposed to carry a monoblock warhead with a nuclear warhead with a capacity of no more than 150 kt. "
              http://topwar.ru/68819-proekt-podvizhnogo-gruntovogo-raketnogo-kompleksa-kurer.h
              tml
        2. 0
          11 May 2016 09: 44
          You have ALL time satellites displayed on the KP
    4. avt
      +2
      10 May 2016 19: 32
      Quote: Burieway
      . But hasn't the mine option become obsolete?

      Which side? I won’t say it today, but in my time it was designed like that .... mom - don't be sorry! The covers should have bounced after a nuclear strike, when I was still studying, the film was shown to us for the first time by DSP-shny, it was already inspiring! Especially when it bounced sideways on rails laughing Well then ... but that's another story.
      Quote: dvina71
      Only a direct hit of an ulcer in a pu can destroy it.

      Again, depending on the TNT equivalent, there were things when the issue of protection against EM pulses was a direct hit, so that the equipment worked after the hit and it was more difficult to simply calculate the air conditioning of the workstations than concrete was laid several meters away.
      Quote: dvina71
      In addition, the mines are always covered by air defense and have several degrees of protection.

      Well, this is a separate song, as well as from an unauthorized launch.
      Quote: weksha50
      and he has the highest degree of readiness for launch than mobile ...

      Even on cars with LRE on duty.
  3. 0
    10 May 2016 17: 22
    Installation of a unified command post of the 15В242 complex of the Yars-M ICBM of the mine base in the missile regiment of the Kozelsk division

    What is the difference between Yars and Yars-M? There was no information about Yars-M at all.
    1. +7
      10 May 2016 17: 28
      The head part. For details - the deadline.
      1. 0
        10 May 2016 19: 18
        Quote: dvina71
        The head part. For details - the deadline.

        It turns out the RS-26 Frontier, called Yars-M.
        https://lenta.ru/news/2016/05/10/yars/
    2. 0
      10 May 2016 17: 31
      What is the difference between Yars and Yars-M? There was no information about Yars-M at all.

      Right, write right! Desa is a great power!
  4. bad
    +2
    10 May 2016 17: 34
    mattresses through satellites are watching and raging .. laughing I imagine how they tear farts .. laughing
  5. +1
    10 May 2016 19: 23
    This is good, but how many mines are left? And how many were blown up and abandoned throughout Russia recourse It is necessary to restore.
    1. +1
      10 May 2016 19: 37
      Quote: Siberia 9444
      This is good, but how many mines are left? And how many were blown up and abandoned throughout Russia.

      The United States incidentally upgraded the extra mines for the GBI interceptor missiles.
    2. avt
      +1
      10 May 2016 19: 37
      Quote: Siberia 9444
      It is necessary to restore.

      No. It is a negative everything, in such still soviet cut banknotes dumped .....
    3. 0
      11 May 2016 08: 51
      many mines destroyed, old regiments, the forest is disfigured, scary to walk. although they could be used for the national economy.
    4. 0
      11 May 2016 08: 51
      many mines destroyed, old regiments, the forest is disfigured, scary to walk. although they could be used for the national economy.
  6. +1
    10 May 2016 21: 22
    Quote: marshes
    I heard that the infrastructure does not allow, although the rotation is being dragged from the mine to the mines.

    Do not drag. This is prohibited by the contract.

    Quote: marshes
    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    The USA has 450 mines with Minuteman-3 missiles,

    So on combat duty they have a third opinion.

    Wow. But Americans and ours do not know that less than a third. And for some reason, both sides talk about 420 ...

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    What is the difference between Yars and Yars-M? There was no information at all about Yars-M

    It was. Several years ago, they wrote that Yars-M is a mine version of Yars with a modified ASBU. Now it is new - now they are broadcasting that "Yars-m" is "Rubezh". So who will figure it out in this whistle of HZ, although the index of the "Rubezh" is different, and the rocket itself is different, so it can hardly be a modernization of "Yars"

    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    The United States incidentally upgraded the extra mines for the GBI interceptor missiles.

    Yes? And that the Americans had "Minutemen" on the "Alaska". I could still understand in California ...

    Quote: Siberia 9444
    This is good, but how many mines are left? And how many were blown up and abandoned throughout Russia.

    What for? Even those remaining are enough to deploy the Yars mine version. And there are more than fifty of them left from the RS-18, which is quite enough.

    Quote: marshes
    Bro, he told me that the locations and possible routes for the "Taiga wanderers" are not a secret for the opponents. Sometimes it is stupid and stupid to build concrete roads that lead to nowhere or from where

    Base locations and training BSPP - yes known. BSP - no. Concrete in the taiga - sorry this is from a series of folklore.


    Quote: marshes
    At the expense of mobile PU.
    The bro told us for some time they were leaving the places of deployment. Then, the cars started back. The commander, looking at his watch, said SATELLITE.
    So the flight time of enemy satellites is no secret.

    And the means of camouflage have already been canceled by the order of the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces in order to drive cars into the "Krona" in each satellite flight? In each division there were relevant documents on the satellite situation. And what if the training position is at such a distance that it will not be possible to return?
    1. 0
      10 May 2016 21: 28
      Quote: Old26
      Concrete in the taiga - sorry this is from a series of folklore.

      In Marie Ele there is. smile
  7. +1
    10 May 2016 22: 42
    Quote: marshes
    In Marie Ele there is

    There is concrete on the exit from the PPD, and not only in Marie Ele. To make concrete tracks for PGRK movement - tell Americans in advance where they are. On training positions can also be done, but not on combat. And MAZ goes quietly on rough terrain, and, if necessary, on public roads
    1. -1
      10 May 2016 22: 50
      Quote: Old26
      Where are they. MAZ goes quietly and cross country.

      Yes, it’s not about MAZs, I’ve already talked about it. To truck under a truck, and what to choose as a tractor.
      To start, normal roads need to be built. At least 4 strips with a concrete base.
      If you build a separate route, then everything is clear, if it is in general use with asphalt, our recipe is -40 + 40, plastic. And so the hodovka is rolled away from the joints very quickly, if with plates. Continuous concreting with reinforcement is necessary.
  8. +1
    11 May 2016 04: 18
    "Poplar" in the mines is replaced by "Yars".
    Poplars, in turn, are shot at testing new breeding units.
    In general, planned work, nothing special.
  9. 0
    11 May 2016 08: 18
    Quote: marshes
    Yes, it’s not about MAZs, I’ve already talked about it. To truck under a truck, and what to choose as a tractor.

    Well, not so about MAZs. There are no trucks and are hardly foreseen. And there are roads to nowhere and out of nowhere in the taiga, as some say.
    As for the trucks, you can forget about the "Yars" on the trucks right away. The lengths are not comparable, let alone the scales. "Rubezh" is also quite heavy for trucks. The tests, which at one time were carried out on the topic "String", ended in principle with nothing. On the subject of "Courier", a wagon was also initially envisaged, but then they switched to more serious rocket carriers with the formula 10x8 and 10x10. And the rockets were lightweight, less than 20 tons with a monoblock ...

    Quote: Zomanus
    "Poplar" in the mines is replaced by "Yars".
    Poplars, in turn, are shot at testing new breeding units.
    In general, planned work, nothing special.

    "Poplars" have never been mined. And "Yarsami" (more precisely "Yarsami-M") are replacing complexes with missiles UR-100N UTTH, both in the Kozelsk division and, in the future, in the Tatishchev division. For the future, of course, it is possible to replace Topol-M in mines, but they are still very young, there is something to replace older. With the new breeding blocks, they shoot not Topol, but Topol-E, from Capyar along a short route
  10. 0
    11 May 2016 08: 55
    Question: The Kozelsky division of the Strategic Missile Forces, will it be restored to the number of regiments as in the beginning of 90?
    Of course, it is great to have the latest systems in service, but the salvo of a division must still be effective. Is there a difference between volley 7 and 4 regiments? There is! The UK can be erased from the map or published if there is anyone a new world map. fellow

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"