Military Review

Former NATO Commander in Chief: Reagan's strategy will help us

81
In Eastern Europe, it is necessary to redeploy as many NATO troops as possible in order to weaken Russia's “not too strong” economy, reports RIA News Statement by former NATO commander James Stavridis.


Former NATO Commander in Chief: Reagan's strategy will help us


“Moscow expects that the strengthening of Russian troops on the western frontiers will force NATO to retreat. But this is the worst option for the alliance, ”said Stavridis on FoxNews.

“We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not allow it to decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania”,
he declared.

If American troops are withdrawn from Eastern Europe, the United States will have to withdraw from NATO, the admiral is convinced.

“Therefore, we should (...) place our troops there. For Russia, the deployment of additional forces is unprofitable in the long term, since its economy is not too strong. (...) This is the same strategy that led to the fall of the Berlin Wall ",
said Stavridis.

FoxNews recalled that this strategy was used in the days of Ronald Reagan, who pursued a policy of "peace through strengthening." She was followed in 1981-1985. an increase in US defense spending by 40%.
Photos used:
AP / Scanpix
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Hubun
    Hubun 7 May 2016 11: 57
    +28
    The ex-commander-in-chief is sleeping and sees how to become commander-in-chief again. And the wall collapsed due to lack of coolness and the desire to bend uncle with a spot on the tower
    1. Paradoxov
      Paradoxov 7 May 2016 12: 02
      +22
      Parade after Red Square to continue along the western borders of the Stoll? Completely fear lost laughing
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 7 May 2016 12: 08
        +12
        Quote: Paradoxov
        Parade after Red Square to continue along the western borders of the Stoll? Fear has big eyes

        The U.S. is all afraid that Russia will start attacking eastern Europe on ground forces, but this is unlikely, in principle, in the event of U.S. aggression on the Shi, the airborne forces will deliver cruise missiles and Iskander-M remotely from NATO infrastructure and it is likely that tactical nuclear weapons.
        In this case, it is not clear why deploy tanks and infantry fighting vehicles of the US Army?
        Much more dangerous would be the deployment of a large number of Patriot PAC-3 and MEADS divisions of several NATO Air Force squadrons. But this is not observed.
        1. Paradoxov
          Paradoxov 7 May 2016 12: 17
          +5
          NATO members are shaking even without an offensive at the sight of real military equipment, enough exercises, for example, to hit a training target in the Baltic with Calibers from the Black Sea with a flight along an "intricate trajectory" ... wink
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 7 May 2016 13: 33
            +16
            Yes, where does Reagan's strategy ?! Or some other US presidential person?
            This is an eternal US strategy called Anaconda. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the Americans themselves let slip, when the Pentagon called "its" occupying NATO exercises in Europe near the borders of Russia, "Anaconda."
            The US State Department’s statement regarding the strengthening of the NATO alliance on the border with Russia is, in fact, a direct declaration by Washington of the war of NATO countries against Russia on the European continent. In other words, This is the announcement of the 3 World War between the continents in Europe itself - and again historically bypassing the United States!!! Moreover, Washington is in a hurry to start this war! In order not to miss your gesheft chance historically.
            At the same time, Washington’s old atlantist approach to its sacrificial colonies in Europe - in the form of NATO countries - towards Russia strictly fits into the Anaconda strategy developed by General McClellan during the US Civil War.
            The Anaconda strategy is an increment of economic well-being (USA) - as the main goal of the war; avoiding a direct collision with your opponent and attracting ALLIES for this and with THEIR help - KILLING the consequences of actions taken for the sake of profit (USA).
            This American Anaconda strategy involves encircling, attacking and strangling the enemy like an anaconda snake (the snake surrounded the ring and strangled the prey, the prey went to the hunter, the snake remained hungry and again in search of prey, which the hunter would point to), by cutting off him from any external, primarily economic contacts, as well as from cultural ties.
            Speaking of countries joining NATO under the leadership of the Pentagon along the entire perimeter of the borders of the Russian Federation, Russia needs not only clearly understand the geopolitics of the United States, respond to it with military warning measures, but, above all, more actively involved in a hybrid war on the INFORMATION front of the West against Russia. It is necessary to try to win the 3 World War unleashed by the USA informationally, before its armed start.
            1. krot
              krot 7 May 2016 18: 01
              +2
              It’s time to leave START, definitely!
        2. cniza
          cniza 7 May 2016 12: 17
          +3
          Everyone is trying to earn points and dividends in Russia, but as always break off - Russia is not the USSR.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 4ekist
            4ekist 7 May 2016 13: 43
            +3
            Thank God and M. Gorbachev we have no chapels. Now, let in its West mumble about the pluralism of opinions.
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 7 May 2016 17: 16
              +5
              4ekist
              Thank God and M. Gorbachev we have no chapels. Now, let in its West mumble about the pluralism of opinions.

              Ha! How is it that M. Gorbachev has nothing to do with us ?! I wouldn’t say that.
              Firstly, no one has canceled his past affairs! On the contrary, the only order of the Holy Apostle Andrew the First-Called (this is the highest award of the Russian Federation), which M.S. Gorbachev, as the ex-president of the USSR, was presented on May 3 of the year by the outgoing President of Russia D.A. Medvedev, what is it worth ?! And morally and financially!
              Secondly. In the West, he continues to mutter against the USSR / Russia and the Warsaw Pact, which he personally destroyed by his sole decision on the withdrawal of the USSR from his composition immediately after his trip to the United States - despite the continued existence of NATO.
              And thirdly. Bury M.S. Gorbachev is still the Russian liberals because in Russia there will be !!! And what does this mean for the Russians and the entire world community?
              The funeral of the liberal traitor M.S. Gorbachev as an ex-president of the USSR in Russia means only one thing. What will it be, in fact, his last liberal contribution to the cause of the US Federal Reserve bankers for their world domination in Russia (or what remains of it) in the field of the geopolitical defeat and disappearance of the USSR / Russia as the center of SUSHI civilization on planet Earth in the benefit of the civilization of the SEA - i.e. in favor of the “self-chosen” descendants of historical pirates, slave owners, usurers of the collective West and the US Federal Reserve.
              In other words. If Gorbachev is buried in Russia, it means that Russia has recognized and continues to recognize itself as a colony of the USA and the “collective” West. And this recognition works specifically for the enemies of sovereign Russia, since it morally corrupts and kills Russians as a sovereign nation.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 7 May 2016 19: 23
                +3
                Here he is Mishka Gorbachev with his corrupt deeds in all its "glory"!

                See the video "M. Gorbachev - British and US Agent of Influence (MI6 and CIA)". Published: 5 apr. 2012 Type better by name, otherwise it is badly searched for by the link - it does not open.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn%20mdWpN5lM0

                And also see the video "Chubais and Gorbachev-agents of British intelligence MI-6." Posted on: 31 Mar. 2013
              2. sgazeev
                sgazeev 7 May 2016 21: 11
                0
                Quote: Tatiana
                In other words. If Gorbachev is buried in Russia, it means that Russia has recognized and continues to recognize itself as a colony of the USA and the “collective” West. And this recognition works specifically for the enemies of sovereign Russia, since it morally corrupts and kills Russians as a sovereign nation.




                Let them bury, but not at Novodevichy, in the Stavropol Territory and Raiku there.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. fif21
            fif21 7 May 2016 22: 40
            -6
            Quote: cniza
            Russia is not the USSR.

            There is no dispute! Russia is a bunch of manure!
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Major Yurik
          Major Yurik 7 May 2016 12: 20
          +11
          Another Yankimarshal advocates the tactics of past wars. More eurotel for meat in order to have time to hide behind a large puddle. Only no one will be hammering them, they will scatter themselves in their own holes when a piece of his striped ass flies from the outstretched headquarters of the Nata! am
        5. iConst
          iConst 7 May 2016 12: 44
          +3
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          The US is all afraid that Russia will begin to attack the ground forces in eastern Europe

          - NATO generals are afraid that in case of real detente around the world they will be sent to retirement or, at best, to a distant bearish corner. So they arrange word of mouth.
        6. DMB_95
          DMB_95 7 May 2016 13: 06
          +1
          Do the states and NATO seriously think that our troops are about to move across the western borders to occupy the fuck we do not need the Baltic states, Poland or some other pile of manure? They themselves will not move to the East even with a multiple advantage, because and without our use of nuclear weapons, they will suffer unacceptable losses. Moreover, at any time they will be in danger of receiving a full-scale nuclear strike. We, too. But to us in such a situation everything will be fucked.
          1. The Little Humpbacked Horse
            The Little Humpbacked Horse 7 May 2016 13: 50
            -14%
            Quote: DMB_95
            Do the states and NATO seriously think that our troops are about to move across the western borders to occupy the fuck we do not need the Baltic states, Poland or some other pile of manure?


            No, of course, no one there thinks so. Moreover, our military cannot protect themselves, what kind of attack is there?

            Stray dogs attack a soldier in the capital of the Northern Fleet

            http://severlife.ru/news/video/2053-brodyachie-sobaki-napadayut-na-voennosluzhas
            chego-v-stolice-severnogo-flota.html
            1. DMB_95
              DMB_95 7 May 2016 14: 03
              +5

              So let them gather all the stray dogs, including you. They have no one else to hope for.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 7 May 2016 23: 56
                +1
                [Quote]The Little Humpbacked Horse
                [Quote]Quote: DMB_95
                Do the states and NATO seriously think that our troops are about to move across the western borders to occupy the fuck we do not need the Baltic states, Poland or some other pile of manure? [/ Quote] No, of course, no one thinks like that. Moreover, our military cannot protect themselves, what kind of attack is there?
                Stray dogs attack a soldier in the capital of the Northern Fleet
                http://severlife.ru/news/video/2053-brodyachie-sobaki-napadayut-na-voennosluzhas

                chego-v-stolice-severnogo-flota.html Well you give! The officer walked normally past the three strikingly intimidating dogs. In one hand he has a briefcase, and the other hand, he did not think he took it out of his pocket. Apparently, this is not the first time that he has walked past them. But the fact that stray dogs settled in the playground between the apartment buildings through which he walked is nothing at all! Where does the city administration only look, not responding to complaints from residents of neighboring houses ?! It is necessary to catch stray dogs, otherwise they will breed - and indeed there will be no passage from them. Dogs are really smart animals - they understand everything. The kids go, they’ll probably feed them here on this playground. But the dogs also need their own territory. They have their own community.
                The video is actually interesting. Three males in the spring of an adult male are not allowed through their chosen territorial recreation zone - they swear at him - because two knots are lying nearby and are looking at them appraisingly. ROMANCE !!! laughing crying
          2. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 7 May 2016 14: 56
            +3
            Quote: DMB_95
            Do the states and NATO seriously think that our troops are about to move across the western borders to occupy the fuck we do not need the Baltic states, Poland or some other pile of manure? They themselves will not move to the East even with a multiple advantage, because and without our use of nuclear weapons, they will suffer unacceptable losses.

            No, they don’t think.
            Moreover, they even know for sure that this would never happen for the simple reason that Russia had serious plans to create a trade union with Europe from Lisbon to the Far East, involving China, which would threaten US dominance.
            And no matter what happens, the idea was born in the USA, to tear Europe away from Russia by making it an "aggressive horror story". Pay attention to the voiced countries of the presence of mattresses -
            Quote: DMB_95
            “We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not allow it to decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania”,
            and now, add to them Ukraine + the probable joining of Sweden and Finland to NATO, and then let's look at the map. Creates a belt of isolation. Moreover, control in this belt will be carried out by American "occupation" troops, which will be fed by the "receiving" side. It is not for nothing that they demand from them to increase defense spending to 2% of GDP. Those. Europe will also pay for its occupation)))
            In order for the Euro elite to be accommodating and docile, it is stuffed with a military threat from Russia from morning till night and, in addition to everything, is "injected" in the form of hundreds of thousands of "bearded" refugees who, by raping European organisms, largely distract the attention of the European philistine from the process of American colonization of Europe.
            Naturally, we are forced to react to the strengthening of their contingent and, as part of the counteraction, to strengthen our strike capabilities in this direction, but most likely we will not have to use them for their intended purpose. As soon as the mattresses have built up their potential enough for Europe to be afraid to look towards Russia, they will begin to lower their degrees in relation to Russia and will most likely switch to the Pacific direction.
            They know that in the event of a direct clash with Russia, the entire model of the world order they are building, headed by the "hegemon", will be destroyed, and therefore they will act "on the brink" without leading to a "hot phase".
            1. DMB_95
              DMB_95 7 May 2016 18: 14
              +1
              The second quote you quoted is not mine. And with your assessment of the current situation, I basically agree.
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 7 May 2016 19: 33
                +1
                Quote: DMB_95
                The second quote you quoted is not mine. And with your assessment of the current situation, I basically agree.

                Yes, I inserted a quote from the article, but the insert turned out under your nickname)
            2. dauria
              dauria 7 May 2016 18: 30
              0
              , they will begin to reduce the degree in relation to Russia and are likely to switch to the Pacific direction.


              Yes, sensible. Even more - the confrontation with China will force the United States even to write Russia into allies. To the Americans
              the capture of the Far East by the Chinese is completely out of the blue. Like us.
              I keep thinking, why aren't they trying to blow up the Chinese system "from the inside"? Neither you decent oligarchs, nor liberals ... There are not even Jews. laughing Missed something? After all, the economies are equal, and the armies will be compared soon.
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 7 May 2016 19: 32
                +1
                Quote: dauria
                I keep thinking, why aren't they trying to blow up the Chinese system "from the inside"? Neither you decent oligarchs, nor liberals ... There are not even Jews. Have you missed something? After all, the economies have caught up, and the armies will soon be compared.

                China is a global factory with a large share of American industrial production, and besides, China is one of the largest US creditors. It will cost the Americans to blow it up from the inside - "it is more expensive for themselves", and the entire world economy will also not be healthy, but creating problems in the further development of the economy in order to force them to play by American rules is the very thing. But China itself wants to be the first violin in the orchestra, and therefore the mattresses will not be able to subjugate China.
            3. sgazeev
              sgazeev 7 May 2016 21: 14
              -1
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Quote: DMB_95
              Do the states and NATO seriously think that our troops are about to move across the western borders to occupy the fuck we do not need the Baltic states, Poland or some other pile of manure? They themselves will not move to the East even with a multiple advantage, because and without our use of nuclear weapons, they will suffer unacceptable losses.

              No, they don’t think.
              Moreover, they even know for sure that this would never happen for the simple reason that Russia had serious plans to create a trade union with Europe from Lisbon to the Far East, involving China, which would threaten US dominance.
              And no matter what happens, the idea was born in the USA, to tear Europe away from Russia by making it an "aggressive horror story". Pay attention to the voiced countries of the presence of mattresses -
              Quote: DMB_95
              “We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not allow it to decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania”,
              and now, add to them Ukraine + the probable joining of Sweden and Finland to NATO, and then let's look at the map. Creates a belt of isolation. Moreover, control in this belt will be carried out by American "occupation" troops, which will be fed by the "receiving" side. It is not for nothing that they demand from them to increase defense spending to 2% of GDP. Those. Europe will also pay for its occupation)))
              In order for the Euro elite to be accommodating and docile, it is stuffed with a military threat from Russia from morning till night and, in addition to everything, is "injected" in the form of hundreds of thousands of "bearded" refugees who, by raping European organisms, largely distract the attention of the European philistine from the process of American colonization of Europe.
              Naturally, we are forced to react to the strengthening of their contingent and, as part of the counteraction, to strengthen our strike capabilities in this direction, but most likely we will not have to use them for their intended purpose. As soon as the mattresses have built up their potential enough for Europe to be afraid to look towards Russia, they will begin to lower their degrees in relation to Russia and will most likely switch to the Pacific direction.
              They know that in the event of a direct clash with Russia, the entire model of the world order they are building, headed by the "hegemon", will be destroyed, and therefore they will act "on the brink" without leading to a "hot phase".

              Everything is good on paper, but forgot about the ravines. recourse
        7. Pirogov
          Pirogov 7 May 2016 15: 34
          +1
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In this case, it is not clear why deploy tanks and infantry fighting vehicles of the US Army?

          What is not clear to you, that the United States controls its lackeys, and at the same time is unnerving Russia.?!
        8. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 7 May 2016 16: 28
          +3
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In this case, it is not clear why deploy tanks and infantry fighting vehicles of the US Army?
          Much more dangerous would be the deployment of a large number of Patriot PAC-3 and MEADS divisions of several NATO Air Force squadrons. But this is not observed.

          Duc USA place them there NOT FOR US, but FOR EUROPE.

          US tanks and infantry fighting vehicles in Europe to control Europe. Europe does not think much about how likely Russian aggression is, how much tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are needed there. Europe sees tanks, sees strength and shakes its shabby tail. And the fact that this force in the event of a global nuclear conflict will simply be additional firewood in a nuclear fire - Europe does not think about that.

          It seems to them Europeans that these tanks and infantry fighting vehicles will protect them ... laughing laughing laughing

          And America does not have BMP tanks against us ... Against us, their weapons are more powerful than any tanks - DOLLAR. Which ours, with permission to say, the Government still can not knock out of American hands ...
      2. iConst
        iConst 7 May 2016 12: 34
        +4
        Quote: Paradoxov
        Parade after Red Square to continue along the western borders of the Stoll? Completely fear lost

        - What for. More such talkers - let them deploy their troops more. The real capabilities of even 10 thousand troops are not so great - well, I do not believe in ground operations. Even in Iraq - until rockets made everything equal to the desert - they did not pop up.

        With Russia, such a scenario will not work. That means they will sit in enclaves forever. 10 thousand in the Baltic states, 10 thousand in Romania, etc. Uncle Sam will pay for everything. And this is a lot of money.
        Let - on the missile defense remain less.

        So, that - you give more NATO talkers!


        But my opinion is that this is all an otmaz performance for the stunned Poles and at * the Baltic states - like: we threw two fighters to you - now the Russians are definitely afraid ...
      3. Ivan Slavyanin
        Ivan Slavyanin 7 May 2016 13: 19
        +7
        Well, they will deploy a couple of platoons and hide from the Iskander!
    2. armageddon
      armageddon 7 May 2016 13: 27
      +1
      Hmm ... Only a pathologist will help them !!!
    3. Altona
      Altona 7 May 2016 15: 47
      -1
      Quote: Hubun
      The ex-commander-in-chief is sleeping and sees how to become commander-in-chief again.

      ----------------------------
      He has a surname Stavridis. The fish rots from the head. laughing
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. meriem1
      meriem1 7 May 2016 20: 39
      0
      Quote: Hubun
      The ex-commander-in-chief is sleeping and sees how to become commander-in-chief again. And the wall collapsed due to lack of coolness and the desire to bend uncle with a spot on the tower

      Let them jump. Dust swallow up. Everything according to plan .. and plan on the shaft!
    7. sgazeev
      sgazeev 7 May 2016 21: 05
      -1
      Quote: Hubun
      The ex-commander-in-chief is sleeping and sees how to become commander-in-chief again. And the wall collapsed due to lack of coolness and the desire to bend uncle with a spot on the tower

      This is not a second-rate buffoon invented, it all started in 1945 with the filing of the Walking Cigar and TruPman.http: //kinoclips.net/news/osvobozhdenie_evropy_2016_smotret_onlajn/2016
      -05-07-14262
  2. Andrey K
    Andrey K 7 May 2016 11: 57
    +12
    Is James Stavridis a Star Wars fan? fool
    Reagan was a big "expert" in this area wassat
    As for his phrase: "We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not let her decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania," this is not cured. That is, he must decide - without Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, where to stay.
    Indeed, the "exclusive nation" and the permission of the "aborigines" ... request
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 7 May 2016 12: 34
      -1
      Well, what, with SDI, the Yankees specifically the USSR to invest money in nowhere.
      1. Sidel45
        Sidel45 7 May 2016 14: 29
        0
        So we no longer live in the YSSSR. They say wiser ...
      2. dvina71
        dvina71 7 May 2016 22: 34
        +1
        Quote: Igor39
        Well, what, with SDI, the Yankees specifically the USSR to invest money in nowhere.

        Well, in detail, how exactly did you ravel?
  3. Pavel Tsybai
    Pavel Tsybai 7 May 2016 11: 58
    +8
    Really like weeds. Climb and climb.
  4. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 7 May 2016 11: 58
    +3
    FoxNews recalled that this strategy was used in the days of Ronald Reagan, who pursued a policy of "peace through strengthening." She was followed in 1981-1985. an increase in US defense spending by 40%.

    Is this how much? If the defense budget is now $ 600 billion, an increase of 40% will raise it to 1 trillion per year. The United States certainly prints dollars, but even the US economy has a limit.
    Russia, in turn, is enough to transfer our troops from the depths of the country to the western borders.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. avvg
    avvg 7 May 2016 12: 01
    +7
    In my opinion, adequate people have not remained there, they can certainly drag Europe into the war, then Europe will definitely cease to exist.
    1. cap
      cap 7 May 2016 14: 02
      +4
      Quote: avvg
      In my opinion, adequate people have not remained there, they can certainly drag Europe into the war, then Europe will definitely cease to exist.


      A war outside of America is the dream of all presidents in the states.
      To ruin the economy of Europe, to ruin the European Union, he played a role.
      After that, everyone will begin to change their national "tugriks for dollars", what the price of a drachma will be even a psychic will not say.
      But this is in the event that the war option does not work.
      And if the war they wash their hands and the new "Marshall Plan", there is experience.
      In general, horns and hooves are visible with the naked eye.
      ministers of defense


      Ministers have already been appointed. You can compare.
      1. iConst
        iConst 7 May 2016 15: 17
        +4
        Quote: cap
        Ministers have already been appointed. You can compare.

        - Well, it is clear that ministers in the countries of the European Union have not decided anything for a long time. Politics and economics are driven by Brussels under the dictation of the end. Armed forces - NATO generals.

        And these - so, for upholstered furniture ... smile
  7. Winnie76
    Winnie76 7 May 2016 12: 05
    +6
    Any bureaucratic structure needs something to justify its existence. Nato is no exception
  8. mamont5
    mamont5 7 May 2016 12: 05
    +7
    Another insane. You can not listen. A lot of them. Tired of ...
  9. yuriy55
    yuriy55 7 May 2016 12: 06
    +6
    “We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not allow it to decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania”


    In response, Russia can demonstrate that it is completely "on the drum" how many American troops will be in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania before they dare to give their last vote ... Putin told you intelligibly, that you will be "calibrated" and "scanned":
    According to the new version of the military doctrine, the Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weapons, when it is compromised the very existence of the state.

    soldier
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 7 May 2016 12: 11
      +2
      At the same time, Europeans are milked, and they are trying to drag Russia into the arms race.
      If American troops are withdrawn from Eastern Europe, the United States will have to withdraw from NATO, the admiral is convinced.
      Insolent brehlo. What then, will you spin their Europeans?
    2. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 7 May 2016 12: 39
      +3
      "... Putin told you intelligibly that you will be" calibrated "and" scanned "..."
      Well yes. We are for peaceful coexistence! We are against war! Therefore, we will "otpatsifist" everyone who wants to do it! soldier
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 May 2016 12: 10
    +4
    Well, as they are now, one battalion per country, let them place them. And more costs. This is just one laugh, not "approaching the borders of Russia." More like a demonstration. Knowing in advance that our troops will not move to NATO, they stage operetta performances with cardboard swords.
  11. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 7 May 2016 12: 13
    +3
    “Therefore, we should (...) place our troops there. For Russia, the deployment of additional forces is unprofitable in the long run, since its economy is not too strong. (...) This is the same strategy that led to the fall of the Berlin Wall ”

    And how will this weaken the Russian economy? This is the United States deploying remote garrisons, to supply them. Russia places troops on its territory, in places of constant deployment. What is in the Urals, what is on the western borders, the cost of ownership does not change ... request
    Or did the general study in the same place as Bridlaw? Or didn’t I understand something? Ahhh ... He probably meant an arms race? Although no, it’s also not like ..?
    I cannot understand them, these "smart guys", I cannot ... recourse
  12. Basil50
    Basil50 7 May 2016 12: 14
    +1
    NATO countries are almost a military association of colonial countries and slaveholders, and of course those who want colonies and obedient slaves. South America * possessions * USA, in Africa everything is divided and only correction takes place, only RUSSIA and the neighbors that were the former Soviet Union remained. Well, what could be the relationship to the future victim, the beads have already been given out, alcohol and drug toxicity are ending, the next stage is military provocations and then the war of annihilation. That is how they captured America.
  13. Tusv
    Tusv 7 May 2016 12: 19
    +1
    Lord Anerals (AS Pushkin) are American. It does not occur to you that we can occupy easy Canada. Only a fig then the northern pay them?
  14. Obolensky
    Obolensky 7 May 2016 12: 30
    +2
    Hmm ... And after that, they want to tell us that we have friends and we can be partners? We do not need such "friends" or such "partners".

    It's time for us to throw off the mask of friendliness and put all these "speakers" in their place. For they only understand the language of power.
  15. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 7 May 2016 12: 34
    0
    Budget, budget, budget. Give more money, further down Belyaev: "We will make hundreds, thousands of ichthyanders ...". And what about, actually? An analogy directly suggests itself - my wife will buy all kinds of garbage with MY pay, marinate it all in the closet to the state of antiques, then something unnecessary needs to be sold - it will be confused again. And then in the evening "my head hurts" instead of getting down to business. But my not "too strong economy" strained. Yes, that's just not fooled for a long time, for a long time no longer a loser, like Russia, if the analogy continues.
    After Yeltsin, not only two or three or ten full-fledged divisions in the Western Military District and Southern Military District will not interfere with us, but not the so-called “brigades” that have been gnawed. Sasha Bely had a brigade.
    1. Sidel45
      Sidel45 7 May 2016 14: 26
      0
      iliitchitch (2), listen, are not our wives sisters relatives? Well, everything is exactly like mine. This is in terms of purchases of rags and their hoarding. Only now he buys, thank God, for his earnings. I take little part in this.
  16. Igor V
    Igor V 7 May 2016 12: 44
    0
    May the American army live in the Tribaltic. Finally, proud Aborigines will feel in their shoes all the charms of an occupied country.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 7 May 2016 12: 58
      +1
      Quote: Igor V
      May the American army live in the Tribaltic. Finally, proud Aborigines will feel in their shoes all the charms of an occupied country.

      Smart aborigines left these countries long ago, and proud aborigines will be proud to have them. Besides NATURA, they still have nothing to pay with.
    2. cap
      cap 7 May 2016 14: 34
      0
      Quote: Igor V
      May the American army live in the Tribaltic. Finally, proud Aborigines will feel in their shoes all the charms of an occupied country.


      Toilets move closer to the lawns, because the flowers will ruin.
      http://www.liveinternet.ru/tags/%EF%FC%FF%ED%FB%E9+%E4%E5%E1%EE%F8+%E0%EC%E5%F0%
      E8%EA%E0%ED%F1%EA%E8%F5+%E2%EE%FF%EA/
  17. PValery53
    PValery53 7 May 2016 12: 54
    +1
    The former commander of NATO forces, James Stavridis, ended the period of remission and began attacks of s (g) lobbing warlike Russophobia. Orderlies! The client is ripe!
  18. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 7 May 2016 13: 05
    +1
    Since the second-in-command commander started Russophobian conversations, it means that he is counting on some kind of haircuts from the leadership. Apparently, he looked at the warm official.
  19. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 7 May 2016 13: 22
    +1
    A hot electrode in the ass - this will definitely help you !!!
  20. Pitot
    Pitot 7 May 2016 13: 25
    +1
    They would repeat the story, read. A united geyropa has always been against Russia. One by one they are written and repented. And Russia had to visit either Paris, then Berlin, or something else ..... Science does not work for the future.
  21. Puler
    Puler 7 May 2016 13: 27
    +2
    Verse on the topic: Remember the NATO rooster that you only bite flies if you bite a bear you will smash you to ashes.
  22. Askiz
    Askiz 7 May 2016 13: 41
    +1
    I read the article, and the current one word from the movie BROTHER 2 "HERE URO ... S"
  23. esaul1950
    esaul1950 7 May 2016 13: 42
    +1
    Something in the gaze of this individual is alarming. Spring is a difficult time for ex-Pentagon heroes and history does not teach them anything, or they do not teach history.
  24. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 7 May 2016 13: 50
    +1
    Only respectful attitude to Russia will help NATO countries
    and the desire for mutually beneficial cooperation.
  25. rosstov
    rosstov 7 May 2016 14: 01
    +1
    What our "friends" will not invent to drown Russia! Their imagination, of course, is not unlimited, but a lot of experience has accumulated, you can always update some old dirty trick. They remembered Reagan's grandfather. Well, be in a hurry, dear ones, otherwise, if once every 100 years you do something good, we fall into a stupor from amazement and gratitude. And so, everything goes on as usual, to live without illusions, perhaps, is still better.
  26. Verdun
    Verdun 7 May 2016 14: 01
    +1
    this strategy was used during the time of Ronald Reagan ... was followed in 1981-1985. a 40% increase in US defense spending.
    When will their face crack?
  27. guzik007
    guzik007 7 May 2016 14: 19
    0
    That bald one. Have you already arrived when they leave us alone? The question, of course. Is territorial. Answer: never.
  28. Sidel45
    Sidel45 7 May 2016 14: 21
    0
    The four-star admiral, the former NATO commander in Europe, considered one of the most prominent representatives of the US Navy of our time, and such stupidity smashes. Yes, at least place all of NATO in the Baltic states, but this will not affect the Russian economy in any way. It’s not for us to feed them ... That will create Shoigu three more divisions in the west and calm down - that’s enough for reliable border protection, but they can get us into a fool, you can use a nuclear club in the person of the Iskanders. Cheap and cheerful ... And where will this NATO be with the Baltic states and Poland? If only the wind was not blowing in our direction.
  29. lopvlad
    lopvlad 7 May 2016 14: 25
    +1
    In the West, brains get in place only after he receives a turnip from Russia.
    As soon as they get one more time so immediately turned away from the frontal impact, we saw this as an example of a sharp U-turn of Donald Cook in the Black Sea.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. behemot
    behemot 7 May 2016 15: 08
    0
    most touches when the warriors for the economy begin to think. Your task is to shoot and not think.
    Monsieur Obama has already torn the Russian economy to shreds, the next breaker drew.
    Sick of these rye. Well, the truth is, only vomiting and vomiting. It is strange that the Baltic tigers do not squeal with delight from such a wonderful perspective.
  32. RedBaron
    RedBaron 7 May 2016 15: 14
    -1
    Well, so far they have succeeded in the strategy of divorcing for military expenses, during the crisis of the Russian Federation it is forced to launch projects for the modernization of all types of troops, but the budget is not rubber ...
  33. Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 May 2016 15: 46
    +1
    It will definitely help, only where did his SDI go, if anyone remembers. They don’t understand a damn thing, even though the whole NATA will fit into the tribalt, there will be nothing there except srach, well, except perhaps a brothel. But this is not the 41st year, they will go to war how the inhabitants of Fashington and other America will feel themselves can only guess, but there is no doubt that they will have nowhere to go. And it is not necessary to use nuclear weapons, you just need to destroy the vital infrastructure - communications, transport, energy, food production, etc. with the exception of residential areas, they should not be touched.
  34. VladimS
    VladimS 7 May 2016 17: 36
    0
    FoxNews recalled that this strategy was used in the days of Ronald Reagan, who pursued a policy of "peace through strengthening." She was followed in 1981-1985. an increase in US defense spending by 40%.


    And later, this time will be called reagonomics, as a result of which the USA itself was / were in an unenviable economic situation.
  35. atamankko
    atamankko 7 May 2016 17: 40
    0
    NATO members do not understand that we are not repeating old mistakes.
  36. Zomanus
    Zomanus 7 May 2016 18: 10
    0
    Apparently they don’t understand that if they attack us,
    our missiles will fly through their heads to their rear, to their home.
    They can’t move away from WWII tactics.
  37. t118an
    t118an 7 May 2016 18: 16
    0
    All "exes" suffer from "great" projects. As soon as they leave, they begin to give advice and engage in predictions. Nostradamus fucking.
  38. parafoiler
    parafoiler 7 May 2016 19: 01
    +1
    Stavridis ?! Yes, what thoughts can horse mackerel have ?! This is fish!
  39. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 7 May 2016 20: 14
    0
    Success is when you have not met the expectations of enemies.
  40. sgazeev
    sgazeev 7 May 2016 21: 19
    +1
    Stavridis ?! Yes, what thoughts can horse mackerel have ?! This is fish!
  41. nesvobodnye
    nesvobodnye 7 May 2016 21: 54
    0
    Today, the United States can afford to increase defense spending by 40% ??? Oh well -)
    PS They themselves will definitely not be able to. The escalation of tension in Europe is taking place, kmk, as an attempt to force us to withdraw from the INF Treaty, and only then they will be able to shout "you all are a scribe!" to squeeze out any money for defense from the Europeans. For the benefit of yourself.
  42. san68
    san68 7 May 2016 22: 16
    0
    "Clever" with a fish surname
  43. AleksPol
    AleksPol 7 May 2016 22: 37
    0
    Lord, I look at Russia-24 about the atrocities of the Germans, not the Nazis, namely the Germans. How I hate you. And if the Arabs put you in a pose, I will be very happy.
    1. Ruslan67
      Ruslan67 7 May 2016 22: 55
      +1
      Quote: AleksPol
      4 about the atrocities of the Germans, not the Nazis, namely the Germans. How i hate you

      Go to the graves of Goethe Feuchtwanger and Heine yes May feel better recourse Have you heard anything about partisan Fritz? fool
  44. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 7 May 2016 22: 54
    0
    Quote: Pirogov
    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    In this case, it is not clear why deploy tanks and infantry fighting vehicles of the US Army?

    What is not clear to you, that the United States controls its lackeys, and at the same time is unnerving Russia.?!

    Good Comment - The US is precisely in control of its slaves in Europe.

    In general, if you analyze what is accompanied by US care and compliance with the slogans.
    Take the same Syria, while the United States cared for democracy, terrorism has settled in the country.
    While struggling with the IG, most of the territory was under the control of the IG.
    The current concerns of the United States are directed primarily against Europe itself, to strengthen control over the Eastern European slaves. It is a pity that the lackeys are not accustomed to think.
    In general, the meaning of US slogans never meets goals.
    Take the relations of the Russian Federation Ukraine. The Russian Federation is building bridges with the Crimea, bypassing Ukraine, and railway bypassing Ukraine. Investments are not small. Why build if you have views of a number of Ukrainian regions? But a demonstration of intent for the United States is not an argument.
    The right policy in relations with the United States is the understanding of the impossibility of building partnerships with this country and the hopelessness of an attempt to establish a serious dialogue.
    It is necessary to follow the example of the cat from Krylov's fable "and Vaska listens, but eats"
  45. Victor-M
    Victor-M 7 May 2016 23: 51
    0
    “Therefore, we should (...) place our troops there. For Russia, the deployment of additional forces is unprofitable in the long run, because its economy is not too strong. (...) This is the same strategy that led to the fall of the Berlin Wall»

    So Russia places troops at home, you are a stupid person. laughing
  46. trantor
    trantor 8 May 2016 08: 36
    0
    We must demonstrate to Russia that we will not allow it to decide whether or not American troops are in countries such as Poland, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania

    Yes, no one objects. Only let the Balts and other Romanians immediately decide where they will bury them, and at the same time their citizens. So that Russia doesn’t decide anything at all, do everything for us.
  47. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 8 May 2016 13: 49
    -1
    Former NATO Commander in Chief: Reagan's strategy will help us
    Only the hospital will help you ...