Military Review

Defense Ministry ordered 2 ice class patrol ships

55
The Russian Defense Ministry issued a contract to Admiralty Shipyards for the construction of 2-x ice-class patrol ships of the 23550 project, reports RIA News message of the press service of the military.




“As part of the implementation of the state armament program GPV-2020, the Russian Ministry of Defense and the Admiralty Shipyards signed a contract for the construction of two of the newest ice-class patrol ships of Project 23550 in the interests of the Naval fleet", - says the release.

Under the terms of the contract, ships must be handed over to the customer by the end of 2020.

“The 23550 ice class patrol ship is a fundamentally new ship that combines the qualities of a tugboat, an icebreaker and a patrol ship. This vessel can sail in the tropics and arctic waters, overcoming ice up to 1,5 meters thick. In terms of technical characteristics, the 23550 patrol ship is unparalleled, " - told the department.
Photos used:
http://nevskii-bastion.ru
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ded100
    ded100 5 May 2016 09: 19
    +22
    Handsome man !! good
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 5 May 2016 09: 23
      +20
      These beauties will beautifully patrol the future competitor of the Suez Canal - the Northern Sea Route, the shortest sea route between Europe and the Far East. good
    2. DMB_95
      DMB_95 5 May 2016 09: 43
      +2
      It would be nice to know about his weapons, if this is not a secret.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 5 May 2016 09: 54
        +14
        A cannon, 2 weapons container (Caliber), or up to 6 cargo (I suspect that 20s, although you can have 40s in two tiers), MTPU 2 pieces at least (these are machine gun installations, put on all ships), MANPADS - although in theory, on a hangar You can put Bending, it is light.

        He has combat missions, akin to PSKR - escorting violators, guarding the water area, escorting naval groups of the fleet.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 5 May 2016 10: 34
          +2
          Hmmm ... judging by the tasks stated on the poster, this is a ship of the "neighboring department", a typical Coast Guard. Why is he a Navy?
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 5 May 2016 10: 50
            +7
            Quote: Alexey RA
            . Why is he a navy?

            "Arctic shamrock" to guard and provide its supply, to drive frostbitten James Bond on ice floes, to spit on American acoustic buoys, to poke fluff under the nose of "lost" adversaries, and a lot of things you can think of.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 5 May 2016 11: 21
              0
              Quote: Gray Brother
              "Arctic shamrock" to guard and provide supplies,

              Border protection is the task of the Coast Guard of the Border Service of the FSB of Russia. For the Arctic, they have patrol ICE.
              Supply - ice class transports.
              Quote: Gray Brother
              chilled James Bond on ice floes

              The task of the FSB.
              Quote: Gray Brother
              poke fluff under the nose of "lost" adversaries

              Again the task of the FSB.

              The only possible naval task for this project is the IWR. But this is what the base should be in order to use a guard of this size in the OVR ... in addition, for the OVR, good hydroacoustics are needed.
              1. Gray brother
                Gray brother 5 May 2016 12: 01
                +2
                Quote: Alexey RA
                The task of the FSB.

                And over "Donald Cook", apparently, the FSB periodically flies, and reconnaissance aircraft, too, probably, the FSB chases. Are military facilities also guarded by the FSB?
                If you poke the FSB into all the holes, you will end up with Repin's painting "Border guards against a tank." And yet, the zone of authority of the border troops is limited to the territory of the Russian Federation, and this is unacceptable for the army and navy.
                1. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 5 May 2016 15: 47
                  -1
                  Quote: Gray Brother
                  And apparently, the FSB periodically flies over Donald Cook, and the FSB probably also flies reconnaissance planes.

                  Are you going to fly over the destroyers on an icebreaker? smile
                  Quote: Gray Brother
                  Military facilities are also guarded by the FSB?

                  Which military facility needs a 114-meter icebreaker to guard? And is it possible for OVR to get along with something less impressive - for the same Coast Guard of the Border Service of the FSB of Russia, five smaller ice-class SSRs are now being built.

                  And most importantly - GUS on this ICE is? Because without it, the protection of military facilities by such a ship loses its meaning.
                  Quote: Gray Brother
                  If you stick the FSB into all the holes, you will end up with Repin's painting "Border guards against a tank."

                  And if the fleet begins to engage in the protection of the economic zone and the detention of ships in it, then the question immediately arises - on what basis does it deal with this and why does it duplicate the functions of the BO PS FSB defined by law?
                  Quote: Gray Brother
                  And yet, the area of ​​authority of the border troops is limited to the territory of the Russian Federation, and for the army and navy this is unacceptable.

                  You confuse the border service and the coast guard. The area of ​​responsibility of the BO PS FSB includes not only territorial waters, but also an economic zone with a shelf (if you remember, the BF was transferred to the marine fish protection authority with all its vessels).
                  The goal of forming the Coast Guard of the Border Service of the Federal Security Service is to create a modern integrated and multifunctional system for protecting Russia's national interests in the border area on the border territory (sea coast, inland sea waters and territorial sea), in the exclusive economic zone and on the continental shelf of Russiataking into account the ongoing changes in the political, economic, social life in the country and providing favorable conditions for the implementation of legitimate economic, commercial and other activities in the maritime border space of Russia.
      2. Very old
        Very old 5 May 2016 10: 44
        0
        MIKHAIL, Google to help you

        What I am personally sure of: excellent driving performance, Remarkable endurance and "ice-breaking" (can I say so? It's like "shishiga" off-road!)
        Russia has always built the best icebreakers and ice class ships in the world.
        Good tradition
        1. goose
          goose 5 May 2016 12: 05
          +1
          It is too small for good "cross-country ability", and too narrow for merchant ships to navigate. In fact, an icebreaker for warships, perhaps, will remove and set up expeditions, supply stationary points.
    3. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 5 May 2016 10: 40
      +1
      Fear Greenpeace! Polar bears and we, too, are protected from you bastards, and from NATO too ..
    4. GSH-18
      GSH-18 5 May 2016 11: 18
      0
      Defense Ministry ordered 2 ice class patrol ships

      Fine! In the Arctic, we are ahead of the rest. And we have nuclear-powered icebreakers. And now the warships good
  2. Teberii
    Teberii 5 May 2016 09: 19
    +4
    These ships are also needed if we want to develop the northern borders.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 5 May 2016 09: 42
      +3
      Quote: Teberii
      These ships are also needed if we want to develop the northern borders.

      For this, a North development program is needed. The ships are good. For anyone, they will divide in half between the Northern Fleet and the Pacific Fleet.
    2. Very old
      Very old 5 May 2016 11: 11
      0
      Why do we want?
      Russia mastered it! Forever.
      The Northern Sea Route is our Way
  3. drunkram
    drunkram 5 May 2016 09: 22
    0
    I have an off-topic question, when will normal patrol ships and large missile ships begin to be built?
    1. kugelblitz
      kugelblitz 5 May 2016 09: 37
      +1
      Lifeguard, tugboat and patrol ship. Containers with the Club may change with diving equipment for example. Also a necessary thing, especially in peacetime.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 5 May 2016 09: 44
        +1
        They added a caliber there for beauty, and yes, it’s a calculated option and planned equipment, but for the most part of the service, it will carry 3-6 containers there just with anything you need, for supply, various target blocks, for example, diving, scientific.
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 5 May 2016 09: 40
      +4
      To build a large one, it is necessary to solve three main problems:
      - need and, if necessary, what, that is, to issue a task
      - energy
      - filling

      With need, this is to the Navy. With energy, everything is complicated, normal diesel engines will be closer to 2020 (D500 series), turbines too (although everything is complicated with turbines, forced work goes to the M-90FR - afterburner turbine, it is far from applicable everywhere, there are others, even designed ones, but putting them into production is also time), with AEU there are a lot of difficulties of different kinds (cost of operation, difficulties with each voyage, with each call to a foreign port, etc.). With the filling, everything is also complicated. The flagship of innovation - Gorshkov, it is now being finalized a number of systems, elements and components, and in any other way. Moreover, the series planned on it will be later, after commissioning the frigate. That is, in order to form the appearance of an even more powerful and advanced ship, you need to work out the 22350 board, which is what they are doing.
      1. goose
        goose 5 May 2016 12: 07
        0
        Quote: donavi49
        you need to work out board 22350, which is what they are doing.

        For industry, a large series of 22350 is much more profitable than small series of special ships. For the Navy, it may also be more profitable to get a large set of ships, the same in service and very tactical.
    3. Nikita Dmitriev
      Nikita Dmitriev 5 May 2016 09: 45
      0
      I have an off-topic question, when will normal patrol ships and large missile ships begin to be built?


      Never. Nobody really needs them. Too vulnerable and expensive. The same frigates have enough firepower and versatility to carry out combat missions today. Surface fleets and large formations of heavy ships will never fight the Dugugs with another, for they will drown on the very first day of battles.

      And what does not suit you the modernization of eagles. Will the Navy 3 fuel dispenser. It is quite modern. More is not necessary.
      1. drunkram
        drunkram 13 May 2016 09: 20
        0
        And what will come to replace the former watchmen when they finally become obsolete and the question of their cancellation comes up?
        Something I do not see the adversaries trying to replace large ships with a large number of small ones, including looking at the Japanese and South Korean fleets, you can understand that they are not going to grind the fleet
    4. lelikas
      lelikas 5 May 2016 09: 48
      +5
      Otvetik - in 10 - 15 years ,,,,
      Into the account of having no analogues - here again they got excited.
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 5 May 2016 10: 32
        +2
        Quote: lelikas
        Into the account of having no analogues - here again they got excited.

        Norse?
        Ours also did:
        Project 22120, the ice class is lower of course - 60cm can break against 1.6 meters in Norwegian, but they also have a different displacement - you can see with the naked eye.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Volksib
      Volksib 5 May 2016 09: 49
      0
      Rocket Caliber can be placed on a fishing trawler, if only to place the launcher. And cheap and cheerful))))
    7. avt
      avt 5 May 2016 10: 26
      +2
      Quote: drunkram
      My question is off topic, when will the normal patrol ships begin to be built?

      wassat A total of 6800 tons and a length of 114 meters. What else do you need a watchman in the ice? laughing
  4. Exumer
    Exumer 5 May 2016 09: 25
    -3
    Katerok Pretty!
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 5 May 2016 09: 35
      +6
      And where is the boat ??? If about the ship - then it weighs like an 3 corvette. Almost 7000 tons.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 5 May 2016 10: 32
        0
        Either I have glitches, or sho .. Does he carry two Raptor (landing boat)? What the hell?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. KnightRider
          KnightRider 5 May 2016 17: 36
          0
          Quote: Wedmak
          Either I have glitches, or sho .. Does he carry two Raptor (landing boat)? What the hell?

          Violators can be caught easier and faster with speedboats.
      2. goose
        goose 5 May 2016 12: 09
        -2
        I do not like the class that was assigned to the ship, I had to call it "ice-class crew boat".
  5. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 5 May 2016 09: 35
    +1
    A multifunctional ice class patrol ship is very necessary for the Russian Navy for the development and protection of the northern borders.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. vfwfr
    vfwfr 5 May 2016 09: 37
    0
    "My question is not on the topic, when will they start building normal patrol ships and large missile ships?"
    Answer: Chore and expensive ...
  8. itr
    itr 5 May 2016 09: 38
    -13%
    According to the totality of the technical characteristics, the project 23550 patrol ship has no analogues, ”the department said. Because the Admiralty Shipyards will build a horse-radish, and indeed it’s pulling an artillery boat again !!!!
    Of course, I am not the president, but I have one question: how could a ship be ordered for the Northern Fleet in the Baltic ?????? geography is bad ????? Mr. Rogozin is stealing again ?????? where are you looking ??????
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 5 May 2016 09: 44
      +2
      Imagine building icebreakers at the Baltic Shipyard, and for the FSB an ice patrol ship of project 22100 in general, in Zelenodolsk (Tatarstan) fellow .
      1. itr
        itr 5 May 2016 10: 26
        -2
        I agree with you completely! but for today let them do something on time
        except idle talk! scored volumes but no sense
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 5 May 2016 09: 50
      +5
      And, in the North, there are suddenly no sites for construction. Those that are loaded with orders up to 2025 + year in reload. The asterisk is more the center of ship repair, production there is clogged with special vehicles for loading long items into black boats (s). It’s better to build on the spot.

      For the North, from time immemorial, built in the Baltic. Petya and Nakhimov in the Baltic, Chabanenko in the Baltic, 3 BOD also in the Baltic.
      1. itr
        itr 5 May 2016 10: 33
        -1
        donavi49 Hello!
        My friend is building Chemists on the Germans in Korea, the last place of deployment of Busan or whatever it is
        The Germans were negotiating with the Shipyards and were in frank indignation "I'm talking about the business approach of the shipyard and the quality of work" then the Germans came to the star and were stunned by the quality of the work performed and the infrastructure of the enterprise. But the matter did not reach the conclusion of the contract, foreign banks did not give a loan to the ZVEZDOCHKA, so the grandmother went to Korea and China right now.
        Why am I all this? There used to be a lot of things, but right now it’s completely different. It is sad
  9. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 5 May 2016 09: 39
    +1
    Ice and a half meters, but not weak
  10. Volksib
    Volksib 5 May 2016 09: 53
    +2
    Global warming has been calculated and laid down in the long-term development plans. Yes and the vector of future struggle is clearly marked. Ready to sled in the summer and a cart in the winter. Airborne troops landed on the ice. This was not the case in the Union. We are deploying the Arctic group. We are working ahead of schedule. New is always good development!!!
  11. atamankko
    atamankko 5 May 2016 09: 58
    0
    In the future it will be very necessary.
  12. iliya87
    iliya87 5 May 2016 10: 19
    0
    Nuuu, nuclear icebreakers, if my memory serves me, are built only by us, Canadians and, in my opinion, Norwegians. But warships with similar characteristics, no one has yet made a campaign
    1. Dimon19661
      Dimon19661 5 May 2016 11: 18
      0
      Google-do.
    2. spravochnik
      spravochnik 5 May 2016 11: 46
      0
      Quote: iliya87
      Nuuu, nuclear icebreakers, if my memory serves me, are built only by us, Canadians and, in my opinion, Norwegians. But warships with similar characteristics, no one has yet made a campaign


      Do the Canadians and the Norwegians have nuclear icebreakers? Photo in the studio. Besides us, nuclear icebreakers, and even then, again, the Finns built for us ("Taimyr", the nuclear power plant was mounted in St. Petersburg). And the Norwegian patrol icebreaker is pictured above.
  13. uskrabut
    uskrabut 5 May 2016 10: 46
    0
    Actual decision in the light of recent events. Since Arctic military bases have been created, it means that there should also be ice-class military vessels, an airplane may not always fly in the Arctic.
  14. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 5 May 2016 11: 21
    0
    Ships of this class are vital for the Russian Navy. SevMorPut, Far East, the series must be increased.
  15. Verdun
    Verdun 5 May 2016 11: 55
    0
    New ships are good. The ice class is generally wonderful. But some complete nonsense begins with the different types of ships under construction. Like in tsarist Russia. And, as you know, it’s difficult to maintain a diverse fleet and use it to solve combat missions. It is necessary to build large series. And determine the advantages and disadvantages of the prototypes.
  16. bad
    bad 5 May 2016 12: 03
    0
    Defense Ministry ordered 2 ice class patrol ships
    ..will be enough! .. with our open spaces .. even 20 are few of them .. repeat
    1. KnightRider
      KnightRider 5 May 2016 17: 39
      +1
      Quote: bad
      Defense Ministry ordered 2 ice class patrol ships
      ..will be enough! .. with our open spaces .. even 20 are few of them .. repeat

      Where 2 there and 4. There will be more orders
  17. Torins
    Torins 5 May 2016 15: 35
    0
    Beautiful ships in the Russian Federation are building good
  18. exo
    exo 5 May 2016 20: 27
    0
    Unfortunately, we are building ships that should complement and provide the main combat units. But we practically do not have and do not build these units.
    And so, the icebreaker is interesting. It will definitely not be superfluous.
  19. cedar
    cedar 5 May 2016 20: 46
    +1
    For special operations in the Arctic, it’s enough ... to climb the skerries ... Who needs to be dropped off, what needs to be unloaded, it must be taken ... and ice is not a hindrance. There is a helicopter and a cannon, and there are racquets and they will put something else interesting, so that the adversary in the Arctic would not become impudent. Wonderful boat!