Military Review

American expert: Russia successfully uses the "newest propaganda tool" - drones

135
Russia has a “newest means of propaganda,” which it widely uses - these are drones, leads RIA News the opinion of the American security expert Adam Saxton, which he set forth in an article for National Interest.





“Shortly after the release of Palmyra from the militants, the Russian state television channels released a video of excellent quality made by the drone, which showed the ruins of the city. In general, the Russian media from the very beginning of the Russian operation in Syria regularly publish professional-made images that look more like shots from a video game, ”the author writes.

Shooting from the air "really gives a lot more opportunities in fixing what is happening in the conflict zone," he admits. But at the same time it comes to the only conclusion: “Russia used drones as a unique propaganda tool.”

Saxton accused Moscow of “distorting information about the Syrian conflict,” although he couldn’t give specific facts, citing research of certain “private groups” in his arguments.

In his opinion, “all that the Russian media want is to get as large an audience as possible, and not to present the facts objectively.”

The author does not hide the irritation that "news Russian mass media (RT in particular) attract the attention of viewers and actively refute Western versions. ” “Western media and the United States would do well to learn how to use this latest technology in covering conflicts, as well as for information operations,” he writes.

Saxton advises Western publications not to forget that "the Russian media do not have a monopoly on drones." He called on the US and the EU to “actively use drones to cover events and to engage in pro-European propaganda.”

The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.

According to him, Washington has no right to relax. "The United States should closely monitor Russia, which continues to expand the horizons of using UAVs," concludes Saxton.
Photos used:
Alexander PUSHIN / Evgeny PODDUBNY / VGTRK / Russia24
135 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Rock_n_roll
    Rock_n_roll 4 May 2016 10: 13
    +34
    In Ukraine, not drones. and drynya))
    1. just exp
      just exp 4 May 2016 10: 23
      +47
      Only Dryn can show what is not.
      for some reason I did not see a video with Russian troops in the Donbass.
      maybe kakly greedy and do not show for free? or maybe they don’t have anything and the aftir in the article breaks like kakl on the Maidan?
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 4 May 2016 10: 55
        +27
        He called on the US and the EU to "actively use drones to cover events and engage in pro-European propaganda."

        The problem is that it’s hard to fasten a blatant lie to the drone video, which is what the Western media have done.
        1. Altona
          Altona 4 May 2016 10: 59
          +7
          Quote: Thrall
          The problem is that it’s hard to fasten a blatant lie to the drone video, which is what the Western media have done.

          ---------------------
          By the way, video from drones was first used as propaganda by the United States. Sky News and CNN as they broadcast their victorious wars in Iraq and Yugoslavia. That is, in fact, with "Desert Storm", the era of live broadcasting of the war began, when we were shown the spectacular explosions of destroyed facilities of the US opponents.
        2. Blondy
          Blondy 4 May 2016 11: 53
          +17
          Where the world is heading: in childhood, all my ears buzzed about the corrupting influence of bourgeois propaganda, and now all the bourgeoisie are screaming about the destructive effect of Russian propaganda on the minds.
          1. Zfoni
            Zfoni 4 May 2016 12: 07
            -41%
            Buzzed successfully. You are still convinced of the corrupting influence of the West)))
            1. Sharapov
              Sharapov 4 May 2016 12: 23
              +10
              Judging by the state of affairs in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria - this influence of the West is not just harmful, it is fucked up. Or do you say that the Taliban, Ishil, Al Qaeda and other Islamic shnyag appeared out of nowhere?
            2. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 4 May 2016 13: 10
              +8
              Quote: Zfoni
              Buzzed successfully. You are still convinced of the corrupting influence of the West)))

              Personally, I am convinced of the destructive, bloody and anti-human influence of the West.
              1. Zfoni
                Zfoni 4 May 2016 13: 55
                -15%
                Quote: Observer 33
                Quote: Zfoni
                Buzzed successfully. You are still convinced of the corrupting influence of the West)))

                Personally, I am convinced of the destructive, bloody and anti-human influence of the West.



                Then be consistent to the end. in my case, I have many relatives who died in the Holocaust and I carefully monitor not to buy German products. you need to stop using computers, boarding schools invented in the West, not fly on Boeing and airbuses and move on domestic or Chinese cars
                1. 33 Watcher
                  33 Watcher 4 May 2016 14: 13
                  +16
                  Quote: Zfoni
                  and I carefully monitor

                  You can "watch carefully" for anything.
                  Quote: Zfoni
                  you need

                  Since when do you decide what I need?
                  Quote: Zfoni
                  consistent

                  Yes, they owe me a lot for the destruction of my homeland. I hope that I will live up to the moment of debt collection, and I will still be able to keep weapons. And in which direction to shoot, believe me, I know for sure. This is the sequence, from my point of view.
                  1. Chisayna
                    Chisayna 4 May 2016 15: 20
                    +7
                    Nda, "a lot of relatives died in the ho (....) bone". I follow in order not to buy German products "Nda. That no ho-st does not prevent your army from using German submarines. Or in your army the Jews were crushed.
                    1. Zfoni
                      Zfoni 4 May 2016 18: 07
                      -4
                      Not. German boats are simply the best in their class, and in matters of equipping the army, history should not affect decisions on arming the army. As for my individual family, we do not buy German goods.
                      1. Chisayna
                        Chisayna 4 May 2016 18: 22
                        +7
                        Here is the real e-sky answer.
                      2. 33 Watcher
                        33 Watcher 5 May 2016 03: 11
                        +3
                        Quote: Zfoni
                        Not. German boats are simply the best in their class, and in matters of equipping the army, history should not affect decisions on arming the army. As for my individual family, we do not buy German goods.

                        Selectively sequential yes t.d.
                      3. Andrey K
                        Andrey K 5 May 2016 09: 09
                        +5
                        "No. It's just that German boats are the best in their class ..."
                        The question arises: If you unequivocally affirm this, then do you deign to clarify in which particular class of submarines?
                        The German fleet (Deutsche Marine) includes whole !!! 6 submarines (of which two fifth years have not been accepted into the composition and are being tested), and all of one project 212A !!! This project is DPL! With a housing, including fiberglass! At the same time, the industry offers for export 31 class submarines (German classification).
                        What are the best German submarines in your opinion? request What do you compare them with?
                        Before entering into highly intellectual conversations, especially technical ones, I would recommend that you still study the materiel, and not sculpt the hunchback ... hi
                      4. Zfoni
                        Zfoni 6 May 2016 14: 11
                        -3
                        Quote: Andrey K
                        "No. It's just that German boats are the best in their class ..."
                        The question arises: If you unequivocally affirm this, then do you deign to clarify in which particular class of submarines?
                        The German fleet (Deutsche Marine) includes whole !!! 6 submarines (of which two fifth years have not been accepted into the composition and are being tested), and all of one project 212A !!! This project is DPL! With a housing, including fiberglass! At the same time, the industry offers for export 31 class submarines (German classification).
                        What are the best German submarines in your opinion? request What do you compare them with?
                        Before entering into highly intellectual conversations, especially technical ones, I would recommend that you still study the materiel, and not sculpt the hunchback ... hi



                        How much aggression you have, however ... I will answer you in essence. We are talking about the diesel-electric submarine class. The fact that the Russian diesel-electric submarine of project 677 "Lada" is the best in this class is not even discussed, especially since it is clear to any more or less literate person that Russian weapons have no competitors. Due to the fact that, for political reasons, Russian weapons are not available to us, of the remaining improved project 212 is the best.
                      5. Professor
                        Professor 6 May 2016 14: 18
                        -2
                        Quote: Zfoni
                        This is a DEPL class.

                        Let me intervene in your intellectual debate as a real telephone (I live a couple of kilometers from the northern border). The German boats under discussion are not DEPL, but NAPL. But in this class, Russia has so far nothing to offer. hi
                  2. carbofo
                    carbofo 6 May 2016 11: 20
                    +2
                    German submarines just got you cheap for the Holocaust, they are not the best in the world. You skate this skate in Germany in full.
                    You are guided only by profit.
            3. cumastra1
              cumastra1 4 May 2016 14: 53
              +8
              Wagner's not listening either? You know, the rejection of all German also smells bad. The fascists, just like you, started with a boycott of Jewish stores, and ended ... Auschwitz. Such a growth prospect. God forbid to enter into force to you and others like you. But we still distinguish people from the Nazis, and I advise you to learn this.
            4. Gogia
              Gogia 4 May 2016 15: 53
              +6
              Zfoni, we have so many people died from the Germans, Finns, Poles, Japanese, etc. that there are fewer Jews in the world now.
              And the first specialists in the Holocaust are Poles. This is their invention. Concentration camps. It was in the 21-22 year. They then rotted 100000 Red Army men. True, they forgot about it today, just as they forgot about the only 100 years of their prosperity under the heel of the treacherous Russians.
              1. kagorta
                kagorta 4 May 2016 19: 36
                +2
                The concentration camp is an English invention during the Boer Wars.
            5. volgroo
              volgroo 4 May 2016 22: 08
              +3
              The computer was the first to be invented in Russia as well as radio and much more.
        3. Gogia
          Gogia 4 May 2016 15: 48
          +5
          Not anymore, but we still believe in American and Israeli altruism :))) and we believe that the United States is in Yugoslavia, Kosovo, Vietnam, Japan, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. cared for civilians more than their own benefit.
          We believe that CNN shows the truth, even if the footage is 4 years old and he is from another country. We believe that it was not the United States that developed Alkaida and Ben-Ladan; we believe that the Moderate opposition from Syrian Jebhat-An-Nusra did not go to Israel for treatment. We do not believe only ourselves - because we know - we want to sweep the whole world and baptize everyone in the Orthodox faith - even squids from the Sea of ​​Japan!
    2. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 4 May 2016 19: 11
      +3
      Quote: Thrall
      He called on the US and the EU to "actively use drones to cover events and engage in pro-European propaganda."

      The problem is that it’s hard to fasten a blatant lie to the drone video, which is what the Western media have done.

      Well, now they’re doing it even easier ... They give out other people’s shootings as their own. It's simpler. Just shameful, like that. But nothing, time will pass, the nuances will be forgotten and the winners will be appointed.
  2. GSH-18
    GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 22
    +4
    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.
    laughing laughing laughing Here the durik had another attack!
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 4 May 2016 11: 37
      +4
      Quote: GSH-18
      Here the durik had another attack!

      Yeah, on the echo of matzah, the same one also uploads data on our losses in Ukraine - to the question what do you prove - a concrete answer - what do you prove that there is not!
  3. GSH-18
    GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 25
    +2
    Quote: just explo
    for some reason I did not see a video with Russian troops in the Donbass.
    maybe kakly greedy and do not show for free?

    Castrylegolovym forever something seems. When it seems, it is necessary to be baptized, but they cannot, evil spirits have another patron.
    1. HK416
      HK416 4 May 2016 12: 44
      -16%
      scrapes do not press in genes?
  4. mihasik
    mihasik 4 May 2016 11: 59
    +2
    Quote: just explo
    Only Dryn can show what is not.
    for some reason I did not see a video with Russian troops in the Donbass.

    t / f "DMB".
    A ladle for the young after a smoked "joint":
    C. Do you see a gopher?
    M. No.
    C. And I do not. But he is!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. HK416
    HK416 4 May 2016 12: 42
    -10%
    probably they just didn’t show you, just didn’t see
  • Stalker.1977
    Stalker.1977 4 May 2016 10: 25
    +8
    To strangle the reptiles, for their vile, deceitful and perverse statements.
  • 79807420129
    79807420129 4 May 2016 10: 38
    +17
    "The news of the Russian media (in particular RT) attracts the attention of viewers and actively refute the versions of the West." "

    Now drones are to blame and RT, and then who? He needs to be treated already. Schizophrenia comes from the banks of the striped fool
  • GSH-18
    GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 19
    +2
    Aerial photography "really gives much wider possibilities in capturing what is happening in the conflict zone"

    И
    Saxton accused Moscow of "distorting information about the Syrian conflict"True, he could not cite specific facts, referring in his reasoning to the studies of certain "private groups"

    This American expert has paranoia.
  • GSH-18
    GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 36
    0
    According to him, Washington has no right to relax. "The United States should closely monitor Russia, which continues to expand the horizons of using UAVs," concludes Saxton.

    Saxton, go home bully
  • Andrey K
    Andrey K 4 May 2016 10: 14
    +27
    An interesting perspective is drones, this is "the latest means of propaganda" ...
    Naturally!!! After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...
    Yes, really - this is a good information shower ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. DMB_95
      DMB_95 4 May 2016 10: 38
      +4
      And why did this "American expert" decide that Russia is not waging an information war?
    3. yushch
      yushch 4 May 2016 10: 40
      +10
      Quote: Andrey K
      An interesting perspective is drones, this is "the latest means of propaganda" ...
      Naturally!!! After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...
      Yes, really - this is a good information shower ...


      the author is simply outraged by the fact that "backward Russians with their rusty missiles and airplanes" dared to use "light democratic" drones for execution laughing their black and insidious plans.
    4. Professor
      Professor 4 May 2016 10: 45
      -32%
      Quote: Andrey K
      After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...

      These are not your UAVs, these are on 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists on Amazon. It is about them that we are talking. By the way a penny UAV.
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 4 May 2016 10: 56
        +14
        Do not worry, professor, there will be ours.
      2. vlad66
        vlad66 4 May 2016 10: 57
        +27
        Quote: Professor
        These are not your UAVs, these are 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists in the Amazon. It is about them that we are talking.

        Yes, who would argue with you, pan professor fellow Only our journalists filmed reports, and who's stopping yours? Envy in silence, professor. negative
        1. Professor
          Professor 4 May 2016 11: 05
          -26%
          Quote: NordUral
          Do not worry, professor, there will be ours.

          Will not. These Chinese household drones are unrivaled. For just $ 1,399.00 a drone with an ultra-high expansion camera and a bunch of gadgets. For example, a range of 5 km, auto tracking of a target, auto return to the starting point, speed up to 72 km / h. Not bad for a toy? wink

          Quote: vlad66
          Only our journalists filmed reports, and who is stopping yours?

          What is ours for ours? Israeli or Western? Israeli and Western also take off. What is the problem? request
          1. 79807420129
            79807420129 4 May 2016 11: 45
            +24
            Quote: Professor
            These are not your UAVs, these are 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists in the Amazon. It is about them that we are talking.

            So what? If you use an iPhone-6 made in the USA, do you think we’ll make fun of you, like you giggle? You won’t be surprised, we won’t walk with your walkie-talkie, if you want to spoil your mood, you flew by again, I laughed only above you, if you are trolling, God bless you, as atalef subtly and smartly you still can’t do it, so why the hedge garden.
            Quote: Professor
            Israeli and Western also take off. What is the problem?

            Well done, they’re doing it right, here’s a colleague answered you:
            Quote: Thrall
            The problem is that it’s hard to fasten a blatant lie to the drone video, which is what the Western media have done.

            Be smarter, Mr. Professor. winked
          2. NordUral
            NordUral 4 May 2016 12: 10
            +1
            My answer is - there is no limit to perfection. Technique is no exception. And the cost is not always the most important.
          3. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 4 May 2016 13: 16
            +2
            Quote: Professor
            What is ours for ours? Israeli or Western? Israeli and Western also take off. What is the problem?

            The problem is that they are filming everything, but "Russian propaganda".
            So how do you think the news differs from propaganda?
            1. Professor
              Professor 4 May 2016 13: 24
              -5
              Quote: Observer 33
              So how do you think the news differs from propaganda?

              Comments sir. hi
              1. 33 Watcher
                33 Watcher 4 May 2016 13: 52
                +7
                Quote: Professor
                Quote: Observer 33
                So how do you think the news differs from propaganda?

                Comments sir. hi

                Those. in your opinion, if we imagine a video sequence, with a man with a shaved head, on the back of his head a swastika tattoo flaunts. And who yells, "m ... willow on knives," while firing into the air from the AK, and at the same time comment that this is a young ornithologist who came to the rally, will something change? belay
                Do you still urge (insist) that you stop believing your eyes? Why are you ..?
                1. Professor
                  Professor 4 May 2016 14: 45
                  +3
                  Here is an example from life, three armed terrorists attacked police officers and were eliminated. BBC video: three corpses on the ground, above them policemen with weapons in their hands and the comment: "Israeli police shot three Palestinian teenagers." It seems that the journalists did not lie, the terrorists were indeed Palestinians and really teenagers, but something is wrong ...
                  1. 33 Watcher
                    33 Watcher 4 May 2016 15: 48
                    +7
                    Quote: Professor
                    BBC footage

                    Certainly "Russian propaganda" yes
                    Quote: Professor
                    Palestinian teens

                    Again, damned crying
                    Quote: Professor
                    but something is wrong ...

                    This is because the BBC is the "non-living" media and true news. And only Russian propaganda. Everything is so, everything is so, everything is in its place. yes
                    Or an example, unsuccessful, or I lost a thread ..? What were we talking about? request laughing
                    1. Roman Skomorokhov
                      Roman Skomorokhov 4 May 2016 16: 33
                      +3
                      Everything is as usual - we start about Russia, we end for Israel. We started off for drones and filming, ended up with the Bibi misinterpreting events in Israel.

                      And where is the logic ... And where does Russia ...
                    2. Professor
                      Professor 4 May 2016 19: 17
                      -6
                      Quote: Observer 33
                      Certainly "Russian propaganda"

                      Your propaganda is even worse.


                      Quote: Observer 33
                      Or an example, unsuccessful, or I lost a thread ..?

                      You understand everything.

                      Quote: Banshee
                      Everything is as usual - we start about Russia, we end for Israel. We started off for drones and filming, ended up with the Bibi misinterpreting events in Israel.

                      We started for drones and journalists, or rather UAVs in the hands of journalists. So we discussed this ancient profession.

                      Quote: Banshee
                      And where is the logic ... And where does Russia ...

                      American expert: Russia successfully uses the “latest propaganda tool” - drones
                      Are you the author of the article? wink
                      1. 33 Watcher
                        33 Watcher 5 May 2016 03: 30
                        +3
                        Quote: Professor
                        Your propaganda is even worse.

                        Worse than that? The killings? Rape? Torture So worse than that?
                        By the way, to put Yarosh's business card, for example, would you like to? wink
                        Quote: Professor
                        You understand everything.

                        And for a long time ... Here your fellow countryman is higher, he suffered greatly from the Holocaust, so tell him about "there are no fascists" and "onizhedeti", you can give him a handkerchief (embroidered). But I don’t need it, I’ve been clear for a long time. And believe me, in order to call a Bandera - a Bandera, I do not need the approval of the media.
                      2. Professor
                        Professor 5 May 2016 06: 49
                        -1
                        Quote: Observer 33
                        Worse than that?

                        Outright lies.

                        Quote: Observer 33
                        And for a long time ...

                        Happy for you.
                      3. 33 Watcher
                        33 Watcher 5 May 2016 10: 00
                        +2
                        Quote: Professor
                        Outright lies.

                        So far, they’ve never been caught. It’s not for nothing that I remembered about a business card ...
                      4. Professor
                        Professor 5 May 2016 10: 15
                        -1
                        Quote: Observer 33
                        So far, they’ve never been caught.

    5. asiat_61
      asiat_61 4 May 2016 14: 42
      +3
      China is already the bourgeoisie? But what about the CCP, the leading and guiding force?
      1. Professor
        Professor 4 May 2016 14: 55
        0
        Quote: asiat_61
        China is already the bourgeoisie? But what about the CCP, the leading and guiding force?

        Of course the bourgeoisie. Means of production in private hands.
  • Gray brother
    Gray brother 4 May 2016 11: 00
    +11
    Quote: Professor
    These are not your UAVs.

    In fact, the sale is our UAV.
  • Monos
    Monos 4 May 2016 11: 01
    +20
    Learn Russian, fine. "Ours" can mean both "made with us" and "ours." And so they are, yes, Chinese. So what? The picture is ours!
  • Andrey K
    Andrey K 4 May 2016 11: 04
    +9
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: Andrey K
    After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...

    These are not your UAVs, these are on 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists on Amazon. It is about them that we are talking. By the way a penny UAV.

    Less to you.
    Do not disgrace the word "professor", before you try to troll, study the materiel ... Where, who and whose UAV ...
  • GSH-18
    GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 30
    +5
    Quote: Professor
    These are not your UAVs,

    This fact further aggravates the attitude to the American point of view. We beat the enemy with his own weapon good
    1. Professor
      Professor 4 May 2016 11: 37
      -17%
      Quote: GSH-18
      We beat the enemy with his own weapon

      Everything was confused, both horses and people. We are not talking about weapons or "victories", but about simple household appliances. Well, like "Russia is successfully using the" latest propaganda tool "- video cameras." What's the news? request
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K 4 May 2016 12: 06
        +12
        Exaggerating is not the topic. Topic of the article: "American expert: Russia is successfully using" the latest propaganda tool "- drones" ... Well, it is also described how UAVs are a weapon of propaganda. Are you talking about "simple household appliances" between the lines subtracted? Or maybe you are a specialist in their configuration? Or maybe you understand the performance characteristics of various types of UAVs, their equipment, purpose?
        My question is off topic and personally to you: Does it give you pleasure to flood?
        1. Professor
          Professor 4 May 2016 12: 53
          -6
          Quote: Andrey K
          Are you talking about "simple household appliances" between the lines subtracted? Or maybe you are a specialist in their configuration? Or maybe you are versed in the performance characteristics of various types of UAVs, their equipment, purpose?

          Here:
          Quote: Andrey K
          After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...

          But in practice, these household drones do not remove barmalei in real time, do not remove the results of bombing of the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets, and only remove the ruins that are not clear to anyone left. This is just a household video camera used not only by journalists for a long time, but by everyone.
          I am partly a specialist in equipment, but I understand the technical characteristics of various types of UAVs, their equipment, and their purpose. hi

          Quote: Andrey K
          My question is off topic and personally to you: Does it give you pleasure to flood?

          Flood (from incorrectly spoken English. Flood - stream) - non-thematic messages in Internet forums and chats, often taking up large volumes.
          And where did you find the flood in my comments?

          Quote: GSH-18
          The article is all about the fact that Russia wins the information war due to the widespread use of Western technology! Wipe glasses

          So be it. hi
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Professor
              Professor 4 May 2016 14: 41
              -6
              Quote: Andrey K
              Killed

              It happens.

              Quote: Andrey K
              This is partly like, I will answer you - this is nothing, this is from the series "partly pregnant"

              This is partly true: I understand the element base, optics, algorithms, payload, communications, aerodynamics and control systems are not very good.
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 4 May 2016 12: 18
        +4
        Quote: Professor
        This is not about weapons and not about "victories", but about simple household appliances

        Dear professor, have you read the title of the article?
        American expert: Russia successfully uses the "newest propaganda tool" - drones

        The article is all about Russia winning information war thanks to the widespread use of Western technology! Wipe glasses bully
        1. HK416
          HK416 4 May 2016 12: 48
          -13%
          Well, yes, Russia wins the information war in Russia.
          1. GSH-18
            GSH-18 4 May 2016 22: 56
            0
            Quote: HK416
            Well, yes, Russia wins the information war in Russia.

            Stupid does not know that the territory of Russia is larger than the territory of Europe (together with Tseevropa lol ) several times! Well, we are not to blame here for the fact that geography is being taught all over the globe in Ukraine. laughing
      3. g1v2
        g1v2 4 May 2016 12: 33
        +4
        The news is really cheap. News for the sake of news. And as for the bourgeois drone - so for God's sake, if you buy, then we rivet exactly the Russian pr-v. Toys of this class in the Russian Federation are quite available - the question is only in the market. You want one hundred percent Russian - for God's sake, just pay. There is no problem to produce - there is a problem to sell. Buy - produce. Tea is not a spaceship. request
      4. Gray brother
        Gray brother 4 May 2016 13: 17
        +7
        Quote: Professor
        ... This is not about weapons and not about "victories", but about simple household appliances

        Do you already drive your own Israeli-made car? laughing
        Like yours, ten years ago, Renault-Nissan was courted. And then look, they will put you on the Lada Vesta and ride like goyim. laughing
        1. Professor
          Professor 4 May 2016 13: 26
          -6
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Do you already drive your own Israeli-made car?

          I am quite happy with my new German car. But do you still walk on foot? laughing
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 4 May 2016 13: 41
            +6
            Quote: Professor
            But do you still walk on foot?

            Of course I go.
            I hope you have an Opel?
            1. Professor
              Professor 4 May 2016 14: 37
              -3
              Quote: Gray Brother
              Of course I go.
              I hope you have an Opel?

              If on my own, then I prefer to run. Today ran in the morning of 21.1. hi
              No, not Opel. I do not like this brand. For me, the suspension is too stiff and the seats are not comfortable.
              1. GSH-18
                GSH-18 4 May 2016 22: 28
                +3
                Quote: Professor
                No, not Opel. I do not like this brand.

                Dear professor, why is it so obvious to switch to bullshit? Here, many cars abruptly yours, or did you believe in Pindopropaganda that we are all impoverished, drunk and stupid? lol Do not tell my slippers.
                1. Professor
                  Professor 5 May 2016 06: 45
                  -2
                  Quote: GSH-18
                  Quote: Professor
                  Not no Opel. I do not like this brand.

                  Dear professor, why is it so obvious to switch to bullshit? Here, many cars abruptly yours, or did you believe in Pindopropaganda that we are all impoverished, drunk and stupid? lol Do not tell my slippers.

                  And will you blame me for not loving everything Russian? wink
      5. Shkodnick
        Shkodnick 4 May 2016 13: 50
        +4
        The news is that where the American media are afraid to stick their nose in, ours are filming and showing what is happening, refuting the "exclusive" opinion of the above ...
  • avdkrd
    avdkrd 4 May 2016 12: 06
    +7
    Quote: Professor
    These are not your UAVs, these are on 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists on Amazon. It is about them that we are talking. By the way a penny UAV.

    Who pays, that girl and dances .... Bought for a penny, then ours. Do not cry, buy too)))
  • Winnie76
    Winnie76 4 May 2016 12: 07
    +7
    I suspect these same bourgeois UAVs are assembled from Chinese communist components
  • Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 4 May 2016 13: 52
    +5
    These are not your UAVs, these are on 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists on Amazon.
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: Andrey K
    After all, our drones in real time remove barmaley, shoot the results of bombing the airborne forces, in which there are no blown up hospitals and markets ...

    These are not your UAVs, these are on 100% bourgeois UAVs purchased by your journalists on Amazon. It is about them that we are talking. By the way a penny UAV.


    And what difference does it make whose heartburn to direct to the Pindocs and their hangers-on from the Middle East. Tea in the Great Patriotic War, our grandfathers-partisans were good schmeissers, the Nazis were given an asshole. And do not care that not PCA ...
  • cumastra1
    cumastra1 4 May 2016 14: 59
    +2
    I remind you about the cat Matroskin - Whose refrigerator? - state, and whose cold - our cold. So here - fly with us? mean ours.
  • cumastra1
    cumastra1 4 May 2016 14: 59
    +2
    I remind you about the cat Matroskin - Whose refrigerator? - state, and whose cold - our cold. So here - fly with us? mean ours.
  • HK416
    HK416 4 May 2016 12: 45
    -9
    and Russian drones cameras?
    1. sgazeev
      sgazeev 4 May 2016 13: 28
      +4
      Quote: HK416
      and Russian drones cameras?

      Russian, calm down, Krasnogorsk that put on tracking satellites. drinks
    2. kolobok63
      kolobok63 4 May 2016 13: 30
      +5
      Of course NO! Have bought from kaklov! hi
    3. Gray brother
      Gray brother 4 May 2016 13: 31
      +7
      Quote: HK416
      and Russian drones cameras?

      I'll tell you a terrible secret:
      The broadcasting company VGTRK generally has all the cameras of foreign production. But they are gradually replacing imported network equipment with domestic ones.
  • Askiz
    Askiz 4 May 2016 10: 15
    +26
    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.

    Yes show the video already !!! Prove, I want to see it myself !!! 2 years and not one video
    1. skeptic
      skeptic 4 May 2016 10: 26
      +4
      Askiz
      ... Russian presence in the Donbass.

      Yes show the video already !!! Prove, I want to see it myself !!! 2 years and not one video.



      If only from video games or stage shots, but where can they get something that does not exist in nature? sad
    2. just exp
      just exp 4 May 2016 10: 27
      +29
      there is a video, there is. their true
    3. ydjin
      ydjin 4 May 2016 10: 36
      +3
      Quote: Askiz
      The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.

      Yes show the video already !!! Prove, I want to see it myself !!! 2 years and not one video

      The battery on the phone unfortunately did not sit down on time! request
    4. HK416
      HK416 4 May 2016 12: 50
      -16%
      yes, there are probably already thousands of videos on the network about "ichtamnet" and "vacationers", two of them will be changed to Savchenko
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 4 May 2016 13: 01
        +14
        Quote: HK416
        yes, there are probably already thousands of videos on the network about "ichtamnet" and "vacationers", two of them will be changed to Savchenko

        Well, discard it or blah blah blah? laughing
        1. HK416
          HK416 4 May 2016 13: 20
          -13%
          on Russian sites, such information is deleted, template break
          1. kolobok63
            kolobok63 4 May 2016 13: 34
            +7
            Look then tinker, everything is honest there! hi
          2. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 4 May 2016 14: 22
            +10
            Quote: HK416
            on Russian sites, such information is deleted, template break

            U-tub, guys, this turns out to be exclusively Russian video hosting! And also Google, Yahu, Bing, etc., all Russian! Everything Putin has created and controls!
            Feeling proud of our power? I am! laughing
          3. vlad66
            vlad66 4 May 2016 14: 46
            +13
            Quote: HK416
            on Russian sites, such information is deleted, template break

            Of course the gap fellow Even the bearded igilovites were able to photograph the Russian military, and either your batteries are running out or the information is being deleted, truly a template break. wassat
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. vlad66
                vlad66 4 May 2016 15: 35
                +10
                Quote: HK416
                especially with them

                About Yerofeyev and Aleksandrov, it has long been known that fighters of the LPR People’s Militia are not on vacation, but volunteers. Another UAV UAV UAV is another troll, it works badly, it’s been pumped for a few comments. bully
          4. Manul
            Manul 4 May 2016 15: 22
            +5
            Quote: HK416
            on Russian sites, such information is deleted, template break

            What a pretty .. A real troll-horse. Well this is now an unprecedented rarity .. I will feed him and I will have my own dog. Like Lelikas’s. And then they corroded everyone, fiends.
            How are you, my soul, with freedom and dignity? He shot the heavenly hundred Golden Eagle? Ay-ya-ya ..
            1. Roman Skomorokhov
              Roman Skomorokhov 4 May 2016 16: 37
              +2
              Quote: Manul
              And then corroded all the fiends.


              Hmm ... do you propose to create a reserve? And the fiends are who, in more detail ...
              1. Manul
                Manul 4 May 2016 22: 25
                +3
                Quote: Banshee
                Hmm ... do you propose to create a reserve? And the fiends are who, in more detail ...

                wink So I’m one of the monsters myself. Poison with dust to the last instance of course. But it’s so nice to drive the last ones personally and in a slipper, carefully not letting you run under the baseboard ..
        2. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 4 May 2016 13: 25
          +3
          Well, do you remember? This is Russian because they have a beard laughing
          And how many video games, in BF 3, have such a luxurious landing of ours, you will fall in love ... laughing Do you remember about 200 thousand troops? Look ... laughing
  • seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 4 May 2016 10: 16
    +3
    Americans no longer have anyone to watch except Russia, or nowhere to get the money? send money to us and get a report for this video - where we flew and who bombed!
  • Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 4 May 2016 10: 17
    +4
    They have a cooler exam! It's like a striptease, you look and get excited! A Russian drone flies, succumbing to propaganda! YaRS is also a kind of drone!
  • Young expert
    Young expert 4 May 2016 10: 17
    +7
    Western journalists will not have enough spirit; spend certain periods of time practically on the front lines!
  • alex-cn
    alex-cn 4 May 2016 10: 18
    +2
    You can’t argue against video recording, at least bite, call propaganda. There’s not enough talent for more ...
  • Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 4 May 2016 10: 19
    +2
    (all that the Russian media wants is to get the largest possible audience), I want to add, which will have the information.
  • Taygerus
    Taygerus 4 May 2016 10: 19
    +2
    but that they will shoot it will be bombed hospitals and destroyed excavators, or as a humanitarian aid they send an ishila with weapons, by air or convoys
  • Dam
    Dam 4 May 2016 10: 22
    +2
    Lord, what nonsense. All the same, their mentality is different from ours, as the mentality of a cockroach from a person
    1. HK416
      HK416 4 May 2016 12: 51
      -10%
      genetic scrap not bursting yet?
  • Bureaucrat
    Bureaucrat 4 May 2016 10: 23
    0
    But is it really a crime to wish a large audience for the media ?! Well d .... ly!
  • Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 4 May 2016 10: 25
    +1
    This is not an expert, but another low-paid and hungry verbiage! The expert conducts an analysis on real facts, and does not fit them into the ideological clichés of the State Department. And an honest analysis of events is beyond the power of such "experts" due to their mental limitations. All they can do is to pervert the true state of affairs for a small penny so that people do not see their lies and believe in their false statements, backed up by unnamed "private groups." This nonsense can only be consumed by people with brains swollen from fat, unable to think for themselves and used to chewing everything that is brought to their mouths. wassat
  • Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 4 May 2016 10: 27
    +3
    Saxton advises Western publications not to forget that "the Russian media do not have a monopoly on drones." He called on the US and the EU to “actively use drones to cover events and to engage in pro-European propaganda.”

    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.
    - Yes! Yes! Let's! We have been asking you for facts for 2 years! It seems that someone himself just dug a grave ... laughing
  • engineer74
    engineer74 4 May 2016 10: 29
    +4
    It's not about what to shoot, but WHAT to shoot! If there are no facts confirming the Western version of events, then even the "Hubble" will not help the earth! laughing
    Conclusion: Adam Saxton is walking and a victim of propaganda, but "not a security expert"!
    IMHO
  • Awaz
    Awaz 4 May 2016 10: 34
    +2
    Actually, Saxton reveals the Western rules for the presentation of information: no matter what they say, the number of listeners is important.
    as Dazdranagon said, let it go, having all their capabilities, they will try the Western media as well as special services to show the whole truth, for example about Ukraine, or about the downed Boeing.
    Russian propaganda, poorly poorly reveals the truth. (not without jambs but still) The Western media, in justification of their version of current events, never present evidence.
    People in the West are also not quite there, they see everything and in the end they begin to think
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Gray brother
    Gray brother 4 May 2016 10: 40
    +8
    The bourgeoisie has a thin gut to work this way, and they don’t need it - you can also lie from a convenient office, go somewhere and risk your life.
    Let them also go to their beloved "Syrian oppositionists" - take the quad with them and take pictures. What's in the way?
    Or is it stupid that the "warriors of the world" will cut off their bosses?

    I just can't imagine a British or American journalist developing the theme of "evil and terrible Russia" in such a situation:

    http://russiaworks.ru/
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • fn111
    fn111 4 May 2016 10: 48
    +4
    We have the opportunity to study different resources, and compare with Russian. It immediately becomes clear that this is either the 180th level of propaganda bordering on the creation of artificial reality, or everything is much simpler and cheaper - RUSSIA SPEAKS AND SHOWS THE TRUTH. Here are people all over the world and are watching RT.
  • voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 4 May 2016 10: 49
    +7
    The use of drones by Russian troops is a significant step
    forward.
    I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
    art. the fire was not used by UAVs, but by special forces risking their lives.
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 4 May 2016 11: 08
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
      art. the fire was not used by UAVs, but by special forces risking their lives.


      Because bpl are less effective. In addition, the Palmyra is of historical value, to minimize destruction is possible only by manual adjustment.
    2. V.ic
      V.ic 4 May 2016 11: 22
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
      art. no UAV used fire

      The UAV, oddly enough, = moves, therefore, if you do not take special algorithms for information processing, then the accuracy will be within "twenty-thirty" slippers / slippers / / in the age of information technology, mentioning the banal "bast" is somehow irrelevant ... /. Don't worry, dear, remember the classic saying of a certain gentleman who spoke a language close to Yiddish, that the Russians harness for a long time ...
      1. Professor
        Professor 4 May 2016 11: 29
        -2
        Quote: V.ic
        The UAV, oddly enough, = moves, therefore, if you do not take special algorithms for information processing, then the accuracy will be within "twenty-thirty" slippers / slippers / / in the age of information technology, mentioning the banal "bast" is somehow irrelevant ... /.

        Are moving? Are the trenches and places of explosions moving too? wink
        Here's about "special algorithms for information processing" can be more detailed?
        1. V.ic
          V.ic 4 May 2016 11: 45
          +3
          Quote: Professor
          Here's about "special algorithms for information processing" can be more detailed?

          Ask how Mr. Einstein the physicist Hendrick Anton Lorenz robbed. By the way, you’ll figure out about coordinate systems. By the way, how long have you worked as an art fire spotter?
          1. Professor
            Professor 4 May 2016 12: 38
            -2
            Quote: V.ic
            Quote: Professor
            Here's about "special algorithms for information processing" can be more detailed?

            Ask how Mr. Einstein the physicist Hendrick Anton Lorenz robbed. By the way, you’ll figure out about coordinate systems. By the way, how long have you worked as an art fire spotter?

            Something told me that I would hear exactly the same answer. Now I know for sure that I'm dealing with an expert. wassat
            1. The comment was deleted.
    3. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 4 May 2016 11: 39
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
      art. fire was not used by UAVs, but by special forces risking their lives

      And why do you think that these commandos did not use drones? In a combat situation, anything can happen, including the fact that the drone will be lost, and the task has not yet been completed. Therefore, no such unambiguous conclusions are needed.
    4. serezhasoldatow
      serezhasoldatow 4 May 2016 12: 26
      0
      It’s hard for you to understand, you have a different mentality.
    5. GSH-18
      GSH-18 4 May 2016 12: 36
      -3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
      art. the fire was not used by UAVs, but by special forces risking their lives.

      By the fact that for a very accurate strike (you understand, this is Palmyra), the use of special means on earth is necessary. Drones are unsuitable for this.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 4 May 2016 13: 29
        0
        The drone gives pictures: photographs the target and funnels
        from shells around the target. Any such photo
        artillery officer per second will understand what amendment
        to deposit.
        What is easier?
        1. V.ic
          V.ic 4 May 2016 16: 53
          +3
          Quote: voyaka uh
          What is easier?

          The easiest way was to launch the Soviet-made Mi-24K. Back in 1989, he put them into operation in HF p / n 32937 / SGV /. There were disadvantages: in summer time, it was necessary to cook at least 28 minutes before starting the engines. Moreover, purely operational problems with the initial exhibition of the course. I could not get the coordinates of the start of the "take off"! Because = "no way"! Although all the coordinates of airfields in the Polish People's Republic have long been known to the "minke whales". Just for memory: "mode 2" and "mode 3", "cattle" / not Cattle, but coordinates of target breaks /. By the way, say hello to a colleague in the flag, to a certain "professor", he is an "expert".
        2. GSH-18
          GSH-18 4 May 2016 21: 15
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Any such photo
          artillery officer per second will understand what amendment
          to deposit.
          What is easier?

          Our dead hero, an army special forces officer, was an AVIATION spotter. Turn on the brain and feel the difference.

          Eternal memory to the real Russian hero!
      2. vv3
        vv3 4 May 2016 14: 52
        +1
        Dear GSH-18, do not be cunning! You forgot to add that our drones are not suitable, not drones at all. And the problem is not only UAVs, but the absence of an information field in our VKS as such. Our UAVs do not give out coordinates targets in a common integrated combat information system. This system should include, in addition to information tools, one of which is an UAV, another combat control center with operators and weapons. All these systems should be connected into a single system, with closed communication channels, retarders, computers and work in real time. You can buy an UAV, but there is no such system, it must be done. Wikipedia mentions the ESU T3, but it doesn’t work, but was created for display. Instead of fighting in a modern way, we are fighting, as in 1945 with spotters. This is even not a shame, this is a state crime! In this regard, we are like in 1941. Saves only nuclear weapons ... Everyone is quietly silent, generals and scientists pretend that they do not notice the disaster. We are in this regard in full ass, read my comments ...
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 4 May 2016 21: 19
          +2
          Quote: vv3
          Dear GSh-18, do not dissemble! You forgot to add that these are our drones are not suitable, and not drones in general.

          That's right. Until they can. But remember the year 2004, Iraq and special groups of American aircraft gunners with laser pointers to illuminate targets!
    6. Awaz
      Awaz 4 May 2016 14: 30
      +2
      Jews seem to be considered leaders in unmanned aircraft, but they are quite successfully khrachat in civilians. I don’t know why they aim there, but for those who do not care where to shoot, if only to inflict more damage and drones are not needed. In general, the topic of the death of the spotter should not be particularly discussed. You do not know what was real there. But a person is by any means better than a drone in the subject of accurate aiming in real time and can adequately respond to a dramatically changing environment.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 4 May 2016 14: 59
        +1
        "But a man is anyway better than a drone in a neat subject.
        guidance in real time. "////

        That's the trick - which is much worse. Top view is visible
        many times clearer than a person on earth, or some
        the roof. Therefore, aerial photography has always been appreciated.
        And the drone transmits data - video - constantly, precisely in the mode
        real time, on each frame - reference to time and to coordinates.
  • pts-m
    pts-m 4 May 2016 10: 52
    +2
    Pendos were so confident in their media that third-party coverage of the facts caused them to "howl from powerlessness" of their obsessive propaganda of a "democratic" way of life.
  • tiredwithall
    tiredwithall 4 May 2016 11: 12
    +1
    "American expert: Russia is successfully using" the latest propaganda tool "- drones"

    The people, and not this idiotic statement of the question? So, for example, we can say that there are people who, when eating soup, have successfully used recently made spoons. Apparently the guy unexpectedly discovered the presence of drones in the world.
  • facktor
    facktor 4 May 2016 11: 13
    +2
    voyaka uh
    I just don’t understand why when releasing Palmyra for adjustment
    art. the fire was not used by UAVs, but by special forces risking their lives.

    Are you a gunner? or an air corrector? Count the SHU with the flying camera and enter in the ASN.
    If you can, then be surprised further. When working with art for constantly changing position of targets, you cannot use GLONASS shells and mines. And there is not enough money to spend on every "Krasnopol" dushman.
    1. vv3
      vv3 4 May 2016 15: 06
      +2
      You are a factor, absolutely wrong. No need to say stupid things and demonstrate your dense delusions. See, you live in the 21st century, in the century of computers and information technology. And you treat us at the level of the 2nd World War.
      1. Roman Skomorokhov
        Roman Skomorokhov 4 May 2016 16: 49
        -2
        Nobody treats you. Choose expressions that are not in your native Poltava. Just because you hung up the Russian flag instead of the Ukrainian one, it does not mean that you are overwhelmed with a plus sign.
        1. vv3
          vv3 4 May 2016 22: 23
          -1
          You are in Voronezh, I am in the Volgograd region. Leave Poltava to yourself. You are a "fragment", and I am a "pillar" and not an empire but the Soviet Army. And one sharp comment on the case is one, not many, and it is caused by the acuteness of the question, and not rude dear moderator.
      2. facktor
        facktor 4 May 2016 23: 55
        0
        Quote: vv3
        You are a factor, absolutely wrong. No need to say stupid things and demonstrate your dense delusions. See, you live in the 21st century, in the century of computers and information technology. And you treat us at the level of the 2nd World War.

        share your mind, and then, apart from unfounded accusations and common words, your brain somehow did not give anything sensible. By the way, what programming languages ​​do you speak in the age of information technology? And can you tell about your working art system?
  • x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 4 May 2016 11: 24
    +2
    Once again I see that Americans are big children. But also lovers of aesthetics. They all love that beautiful show with beautiful and colorful pictures. "Show must go on" is their prayer for all occasions. Accordingly, if someone (and even more so Russia) has begun to do it better than the Americans, then naturally some of them are "hurt". Only the author may be unaware that in order to obtain such high-quality personnel, one needs to be directly on the front line, in trenches, ambushes and other dangerous places. If Western special correspondents are still capable of this, then let them show that Russia "is not a monopoly." Maybe Saxton himself will set an example? wink
  • semuil
    semuil 4 May 2016 11: 38
    +1
    And the truth, as well as why not take it off, always turns out qualitatively.
  • BOB044
    BOB044 4 May 2016 11: 44
    +1
    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.
    Another patient on his head.
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 May 2016 11: 46
    +1
    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.

    Not a very good example. For two years they tried to hear about the presence of Russian troops, and there was no evidence other than fakes, and there is no evidence. The toad presses Americans that Russia is trying to fix everything and present it to the viewer first hand. After that, it becomes difficult once again to blame us for something. True Americans and this does not stop - they lie in three boxes.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. kolobok63
        kolobok63 4 May 2016 13: 44
        0
        What are provocateurs doing here? Yes, it’s inherent in genes! And you have only lard in yours? hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 4 May 2016 14: 32
            0
            Quote: HK416
            Goebels is resting. Bonded genes are a masterpiece.

            About genes just do not have to crucify here.
            “Our country was born out of a total of thousands of betrayals,” Dmitry Vydrin told fellow citizens in an interview with the Ukrainian magazine Ostrov on the eve of his appointment to the post of deputy secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine. And he explained: - We betrayed everything. This is how Ukrainian politics, our worldview and morality were formed
  • weksha50
    weksha50 4 May 2016 11: 48
    0
    "From the very beginning of the Russian operation in Syria, the Russian media have regularly published professional-level images that more like frames from a video game"" ...

    Uh-huh ... First, admit superiority, and then stick a fly in the ointment - "like footage from a video game" ...

    Yes, at least, these footage is more reliable than footage from Ukrainian drones, allegedly "proving the presence of Russian troops" in the Donetsk region ...
  • Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 4 May 2016 11: 49
    +1
    Saxton, American bugs and fleas began to bite you, right? That’s why you spread to Russia out of envy that the black US affairs in the world began to be highlighted with the help of Russians. Further it will get worse. What is not clear in the world why the United States began to transfer its troops to the stinking geyropu? Yes, in order to intimidate the depraved gay men in Russia with a threat, and at the same time to prevent unexpected actions against the USA by the gay men themselves, it’s not enough that they will have a head and then decide to make friends with the Russians.
  • Bramb
    Bramb 4 May 2016 11: 49
    +2
    Does he really not understand why the Americans do not show in the media what their drones see? Drones fly them. And satellites too. And the planes. Everyone is using. Only at the time of the Boeing attack did everyone immediately break down and as soon as Russian troops were to be shown in Ukraine, they also broke.
    And here the same thing: drones use, but do not show to people, because the picture is unprofitable. We'll have to answer why they lied so much time to their people.
  • Sly
    Sly 4 May 2016 12: 02
    +1
    Quote: just explo
    there is a video, there is. their true

    I almost wet my pants from rzhach, shikardos)
  • vetor
    vetor 4 May 2016 12: 10
    +1
    Nonsense is some kind of shock UAV used in the West much longer than Russia.
    And their technology is more serious than ours. Another story that the Russians bypassed again.
    Come on, in short, the budget of the military-industrial complex will increase the western man in the street.
  • Grandfather Eugene
    Grandfather Eugene 4 May 2016 12: 30
    +2
    Once again, I am convinced that such blinkered thinking completely lacks a sense of creation and innovation. I wanted to see something from a bird's eye view for a long time, but with the advent of convenient drones and hd cameras it became a reality, to hang eyes on the UAV. Without even mentioning the very principle of hanging something on the drone’s camera, any device and launching it in hard-to-reach places in the Titanic (1997) film, Cameron used an underwater drone to see from the inside what was left of the ship. And this was no longer a hint of use. If I say offhand that there will be drones of helicopter type RKhBZ reconnaissance, a sniper for the destruction of officers, drones with cluster bombs and anti-tank cumulative for military use and honey. drones for civilians, people of a similar mindset will be refuted, laughing and in a few years they will say that this is an innovation hehe.
  • cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 4 May 2016 12: 42
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    Israeli and Western also take off. What is the problem?

    The problem is that so that you do not take off in Syria, everything says that you are helping ISIS.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • Grandfather Eugene
    Grandfather Eugene 4 May 2016 12: 50
    +1
    As something nasty does not go away and replay them in their own game, they begin to cry loudly and stomp their legs like exceptional and spoiled children of the Earth.
  • drilled
    drilled 4 May 2016 15: 11
    0
    How pleasant is this howl after 25 years of oblivion !!!
  • lance
    lance 4 May 2016 16: 08
    +1
    Attention windows 10 blocks topwar.ru (military review)
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 4 May 2016 17: 42
      0
      Quote: Lance
      windows 10 blocks topwar.ru (military review)

      No problem, I asked my son to hang the old 40-taste, with a "spare" system for 32 bit / XP 2 / the old scanner is working, the antivirus program "360 Total Sek /// damn your brains /, some kind of" secret ". The stock does not spoil your pocket. At least master the alternative boot and you will be happy! By the way, I have been sitting in Windows 2010 since 7, "Tune up utilites" & "CC Cleaner" and everything is in major. Good luck to you. By the way, since 2010 I didn’t reinstall the system. I don’t consider myself a computer “genius.” I am just a “competent user”.
    2. Gray brother
      Gray brother 4 May 2016 20: 42
      +1
      Quote: Lance
      Attention windows 10 blocks topwar.ru (military review)

      Disable Windows Defender and install a normal antivirus with a firewall. Or add topwar.ru to the list of exceptions, if it is of course there - I have 10, everything works fine (I never included regular protection).
      smile
  • nesvobodnye
    nesvobodnye 4 May 2016 16: 56
    0
    The main US propaganda tool is a lie. And in what way it is heard through a duped audience - pilot or unmanned - no difference.
  • zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 4 May 2016 19: 32
    +1
    I read the comments with more interest than the article itself. I will also express my thought about the debate: All wars are waged by people. What and how to kill is, in fact, a secondary matter. But the unapproved truth that the most powerful enemy weapon is attacked first of all, for some reason, some individuals miss. Whether intentionally, or out of ignorance ...
    So Russia at the present time is beating America with its own weapon - propaganda. We learned something in the 90s ... And about the rest of the weapon, too, does not forget. Surely, special means are also available - such as anti-satellite missiles and heavy-duty EW stations.
  • sablezub81
    sablezub81 5 May 2016 00: 42
    0
    The author sets as an example Ukraine, where, according to his data, “they have already used drones to prove the Russian presence in the Donbass”.

    haha ... they will have a heart attack, they will not find Russian tanks and will go crazy together.