Military Review

Media: Russia and China are going to drive the Americans away from their borders

228
The armed forces of Russia and China are rapidly reducing the technical gap with the American army, their new weapon able to "more effectively detect and hit American aircraft and ships." The goal of the leadership of these countries is to drive the Americans away from their borders, the experts interviewed by The Hill told The Hill. Article leads RIA News.




"In particular, Russia is challenging the United States in the Baltic, where it has recently been haunting American ships and aircraft," the publication says.

“After the Cold War, the United States did not have to deal with an adversary who has an arsenal of precision weapons,” said Mark Ganzinger from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Evaluations. - The United States could use military bases near the borders of the enemy, since there were no threats to these bases and missiles. Now everything is changing. "

According to the Pentagon’s deputy head Robert Wark, the underwater domination of the Americans was also threatened.

“Advanced air defense systems are spreading around the world. There are more and more submarines, they are quieter and harder to detect, ”said Wark.

In this regard, the newspaper writes, "The Pentagon intends to develop high-tech" invisible "weapons, such as the B-21 bomber." Also, the US military is working on "raising the technological level of its allies," primarily Britain.

At the same time, experts note that in the United States there is too complicated and lengthy procedure for the purchase of weapons. “While the new weapons will be delivered to the American troops, the opponents of the United States will achieve superiority, albeit not qualitative, but quantitative,” the article notes.

“As the Russians said during the Cold War, quantity is also a quality. The Chinese can launch so many things quickly into the water that our technological superiority will be suppressed, ”said researcher at the Institute for the Study of War, expert Chris Harmer, in an interview with the publication.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
228 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 12: 49
    +50
    Hallelujah! Russian! Take a twig, drive the amer to Ukraine! There is nothing to litter the Baltic mattress. Here you are not there!
    1. cniza
      cniza 1 May 2016 12: 53
      +109
      Maybe from Ukraine and away from our borders, it’s better overseas and let them sit there.
      1. Michael67
        Michael67 1 May 2016 13: 07
        +54
        the Amer army will understand what's what, when it gets over the ears and nose.
        They are cowardly.
        And they will never understand the question and answer to it:
        "What is the strength in, brother?
        - In truth. "
        1. Comrade Schucher
          Comrade Schucher 1 May 2016 13: 24
          +18
          Quote: Michael67
          the Amer army will understand what's what, when it gets over the ears and nose.

          Merikosov has already been disaccustomed to demand, they advise you, they are indignant and give signals ...
          In principle, it remains to push a little and they, these merikos, will begin to ask.
          Although it’s somehow more pleasant for me when they start to beg ... for mercy of course, but I’m afraid it will be expensive
          In truth

          Truth?!
          This is a very complex concept, truth is what they believe in.
          Here Merikos believe that they are the dumbbells of the Earth, for them it is true.
          The Russians believe that they pile on the merikos - and this is also true ...

          Although there is such a thing that truth is the highest lie.
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik 1 May 2016 13: 58
            +104
            Quote: Comrade SCHUKHER
            Here Merikos believe that they are the dumbbells of the Earth, for them it is true.
            The Russians believe that they pile on the merikos - and this is also true ...
            1. Comrade Schucher
              Comrade Schucher 1 May 2016 14: 19
              +20
              EvgNik
              I can’t put you a plus and raise the rating - there are still few comments, but I agree.
              Robert Sheckley, in his quote, did not tell the truth, but he did not lie - he simply expressed his opinion about the helplessness of the truth and the power of lies.
              1. Barakuda
                Barakuda 1 May 2016 14: 36
                +12
                He's a plus. Nikolayich and so "marshal" wink
                1. EvgNik
                  EvgNik 1 May 2016 16: 47
                  +10
                  Quote: Barracuda
                  Him plus to the bulb

                  Plus itself is not so important, for me it means what you read and it seems like you said thanks.
                  good smile
                  1. EvgNik
                    EvgNik 1 May 2016 17: 40
                    +1
                    Yes, I don’t pay attention to anonymous people like Fitter65 citizen, I pass by.
              2. Fitter65
                Fitter65 1 May 2016 15: 16
                +2
                [quote = comrade SHUHER] EvgNik
                I can not put you a plus and raise the rating ........... / quote]
                Well, his agency MUDIZ-with ratings has been announced ...
                1. Comrade Schucher
                  Comrade Schucher 1 May 2016 16: 47
                  +13
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  Well, his agency MUDIZ-with ratings has been announced ...

                  That is, the four people who gave you a "plus" for this comment are in this agency?
                  Do you yourself never press the rating arrows and the "-" and "+" buttons?
                  Your comment doesn’t seem to be attracted to rudeness, but it clearly does not display intelligence either.
                  1. Victor_1
                    Victor_1 2 May 2016 18: 13
                    +2
                    From what. The level of intelligence just displays.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. Vladimirets
                  Vladimirets 1 May 2016 17: 27
                  +5
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  Well, his agency MUDIZ-with ratings has been announced ...

                  We nevermind, we are from Standard & Poor's. laughing
                  1. EvgNik
                    EvgNik 1 May 2016 17: 43
                    +3
                    Quote: Vladimirets
                    We nevermind, we are from Standard & Poor's.

                    That's it. Nothing, namesake, still young, cocky, cheer up.
                    1. Vladimirets
                      Vladimirets 1 May 2016 17: 47
                      +3
                      Quote: EvgNik
                      Nothing, namesake, still young, cocky, cheer up.

                      We will organize a "trash" in a moment. smile
                      1. Vladimirets
                        Vladimirets 1 May 2016 18: 18
                        0
                        Interestingly, this is Ch.M.O., which is minus, will it honestly say? Or will it be skirted?
                      2. Senior manager
                        Senior manager 1 May 2016 22: 09
                        +5
                        Skerry fish, skerries - hide. It will be more accurate.
                      3. Sergey Polt
                        Sergey Polt 2 May 2016 17: 08
                        0
                        Sheherit (b) xia - more precisely ...
                  2. EvgNik
                    EvgNik 2 May 2016 07: 19
                    +1
                    Quote: Vladimirets
                    We will organize a "trash" in a moment.

                    Knowing exactly who - but not a problem. And as it was good a year ago, he set the minus and substantiated it, and now try only - they will peck.
          2. EvgNik
            EvgNik 1 May 2016 16: 43
            +4
            Quote: Comrade SCHUKHER
            I can’t put you a plus and raise the rating

            Thanks, of course, but Robert Sheckley is more of a merit. Checked, these are really his words, otherwise there are demotivators with intentional errors.
        2. Samoyed
          Samoyed 2 May 2016 08: 06
          +1
          The dialectical paradox is still from the ancient Greeks: The spoken truth is a lie. But, for what reason should I believe, I compare and draw conclusions.
      2. Tusv
        Tusv 1 May 2016 14: 22
        +6
        The Russians believe that they pile on the merikos - and this is also true ...

        It is not true. Russians знаютthat pile up. Not through Artikka, so Through Antartida
      3. unsinkable
        unsinkable 1 May 2016 14: 45
        +1
        Quote: Comrade SCHUKHER
        Here Merikos believe that they are the dumbbells of the Earth, for them it is true.
        The Russians believe that they pile on the merikos - and this is also true ...

        Two TRUTHS do not exist. Axiom.
        Quote: Comrade SCHUKHER
        truth is the highest lie.

        This is their truth. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand whose truth is really the TRUTH. hi
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 1 May 2016 15: 05
          +12
          Quote: unsinkable
          Two TRUTHS do not exist. Axiom.


          But what about the clever expression: "Everyone has their own truth" ??? ...

          PS That's the problem that Russia, China and the USA have - each country and nation has its own truth ...
          1. Nymp
            Nymp 1 May 2016 16: 18
            +10
            Quote: weksha50
            PS That's the problem that Russia, China and the USA have - each country and nation has its own truth ...

            There is only one truth, this is the true state of affairs, regardless of beliefs! Let me explain with an example: -For example, you are so "cool" get out of an expensive luxury car and make a splash on others! Obvious? Yes! But it is not true. And you hide the truth for the sake of your convictions. True, these are your holey socks and a huge loan, unpaid bills, and that this car will soon go to pay off these debts is also true! And you can't get away from it, it exists regardless of your beliefs and desires.
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 1 May 2016 16: 31
              +54
              Quote: Nymp
              One truth, this is the true state of affairs, regardless of belief!

              ... I’ll insert my modest three pennies ... Truth is only one of the projections of Truth ... hi
              1. Nymp
                Nymp 1 May 2016 17: 14
                +15
                Quote: Inok10
                I’ll insert my modest three pennies ... Truth is only one of the projections of Truth ...

                You manipulate two-dimensional and three-dimensional space, you yourself are introduced, or deliberately mislead, but the truth is in the middle, in your drawing this is the object itself — it is the truth and everything else is the projection of this object on different planes. You, too, when you walk on asphalt cast a shadow, on the asphalt it can be thin and long, on the fence wall it is thick and short, but you do not get fat or lose weight from it! Your projection in the coordinate system is an unsuccessful manipulation!
                1. EvgNik
                  EvgNik 1 May 2016 18: 02
                  +14
                  Quote: Nymp
                  the object itself, it is the truth, and everything that’s removed is the projection of this object on different planes

                  So in life everything is a projection. Visually - the media. They display projections of the opinions of authors, editors and higher ones. As a result of these projections, the opinion of the population is formed. So it turns out that everyone has their own truth. And the truth, yes, it is one. This is the subject from which projections are taken.
                2. Bort radist
                  Bort radist 2 May 2016 05: 06
                  +4
                  Quote: Nymp
                  Your projection in the coordinate system is an unsuccessful manipulation!

                  Each media publishes its own projection of true things. Each country has its own truth, the whole question is how these projections correspond to the original. If we remember that the community of people lives according to artificially created laws (they are not natural), then each country lives according to its own "truth" and it is this "truth" that must be defended because it is its foundations of being. Historically established and historically justified. It's like the DNA code that determines development.
                  PS "The truth is always the same, so the pharaoh said ....."
              2. Aleksey_K
                Aleksey_K 1 May 2016 21: 12
                0
                Quote: Inok10
                Quote: Nymp
                One truth, this is the true state of affairs, regardless of belief!

                ... I’ll insert my modest three pennies ... Truth is only one of the projections of Truth ... hi

                These three projections do not reflect the truth (truth). Think and you will see that three such projections give several figures. So there can be several truths (truths).
                1. Inok10
                  Inok10 1 May 2016 21: 50
                  +6
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  These three projections do not reflect the truth (truth). Think and you will see that three such projections give several figures. So there can be several truths (truths).

                  ... my respect Alexey ... hi ... everything is correct, you changing the point of view on the subject ... got a new projection, this is Truth, but the Truth subject itself will not change ... laughing ...
                2. EvgNik
                  EvgNik 2 May 2016 07: 30
                  +1
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  So there can be several truths (truths).

                  As Pliny the Elder said: In vino veritas is the truth in wine.
                  1. unsinkable
                    unsinkable 2 May 2016 16: 08
                    0
                    Quote: EvgNik
                    truth in wine.

                    hi drinks good
                  2. EvgNik
                    EvgNik 2 May 2016 16: 18
                    +1
                    Wait, wait, I’ll pour a stack. soldier drinks wassat And just in case, a pan on the head (the wife will be outraged)
        2. NordUral
          NordUral 1 May 2016 16: 27
          +2
          Why so? American warships off the east and west coast of the United States are their truth, but they are their blatant lies in our part of the Baltic and the Black Sea.
        3. Asadullah
          Asadullah 1 May 2016 16: 45
          +3
          That is the problem that Russia, China and the USA have - each country and nation has its own truth ...


          When they say the truth, I imagine a prostitute who died of gang rape ....
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik 1 May 2016 18: 07
            +12
            Quote: Asadullah
            When they say the truth, I imagine a prostitute
            1. sabakina
              sabakina 1 May 2016 20: 17
              +4
              Eugene, deep down I suspect that the Russian truth is a faint echo of the truth that we then learn everything. Otherwise, we would not have been ...
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik 2 May 2016 16: 20
                +1
                Quote: sabakina
                deep down I suspect that Russian truth is a faint echo of that truth that we then learn everything

                There's something about it. You need to think carefully.
        4. Prisoner
          Prisoner 1 May 2016 17: 23
          +2
          Tse not the truth, tse interests. winked And the truth is that for the sake of their interests, they would not act like Americans. That's who to the truth, neither sleep nor spirit.
        5. unsinkable
          unsinkable 2 May 2016 16: 07
          0
          Quote: weksha50
          That is the problem that Russia, China and the USA have - each country and nation has its own truth ...

          I apologize, my friend, that I could not answer you yesterday. I agree with you that everyone has their own truth. But the essence is, in fact, whose PRESENT is PRESENT, without thinking about the truth and its projections (see below). hi
      4. LastLap
        LastLap 2 May 2016 12: 57
        +2
        Perhaps a little off topic, though the concept is subjective, like a theorem and requires proof. Truth is an absolute concept, as an axiom does not require proof. For example, a certain people does not want to be enslaved or exterminated, the truth is in protecting and destroying the aggressor, another nation, if it does not expand its influence, will degrade and die out, the truth is in "expansion". If one and the other people profess similar religions (almost all classical religions, be it Islam and Christianity, profess the same values), the murder of a similar one is a mortal sin. Truth - the first truth is closer to the truth than the second. Accordingly, the right to defend oneself is true, everything else is theorems, not the fact that they are provable, or provable within narrow limits as special cases. Well, something like this.
    2. Pilot
      Pilot 1 May 2016 18: 05
      +2
      Quote: Comrade SCHUKHER
      Russians believe that they pile on the merikos

      Quite. Fool undeterred idiots, God himself commanded.
  2. dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 1 May 2016 14: 19
    +10
    Well, about cowardice coworkers, this is a myth created by the Japanese. They know how to fight, but try to do it pragmatically, pondering the consequences. Yes, they won’t go to the embrasure of the bunker and will not fire on themselves, they consider it worthless stupidity, and not heroism. Just in their blood, think of their own ass.
    Quote: Michael67
    the Amer army will understand what's what, when it gets over the ears and nose.
    They are cowardly.
    And they will never understand the question and answer to it:
    "What is the strength in, brother?
    - In truth. "
    1. serezhasoldatow
      serezhasoldatow 1 May 2016 15: 02
      +1
      So you voiced that they will save.
    2. Inok10
      Inok10 1 May 2016 16: 45
      +8
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Well, about the cowardice of the fosterlings is a myth created by the Japanese.

      ... the Taliban already confirm this on the attached video ...
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Yes, they will not go into the embrasure of the bunker and will not cause fire on themselves, they consider it worthless stupidity, and not heroism. It's just in their blood, to think about their own ass.

      ... a coward always loses a battle that has not yet begun ...
      1. vip.alex113
        vip.alex113 1 May 2016 18: 48
        +3
        An interesting view of the Taliban. So, is war a long story?
  3. Delink
    Delink 1 May 2016 14: 41
    +4
    Well, you laid out the whole truth))))
  4. evgenm55
    evgenm55 1 May 2016 15: 10
    +1
    And also, if the truth is supported by calibers, yars, etc. plus deployed divisions.
  5. Sid.74
    Sid.74 1 May 2016 15: 27
    +7
    Something is wrong in the kingdom of America ... laughing

    There is no limit to the Chekist "meanness" .... laughing They encroached on the sacred, on American exceptional democracy .... with their "rusty" planes they drive the "Donald Pooks" across the seas and oceans .... thereby forcing them to vote for Trump .... so if Trump wins ... you know, these are the tricks of his Holiness ... the Tsar, Putin the almighty ... laughing

    Blade: Putin is bullying Americans to vote for Trump
    Recently, Vladimir Putin, using his air force, has been using “scare tactics” against the United States, writes Toledo Blade journalist Mike Sigov. In his opinion, in this way the Russian leader forces American voters to vote for Donald Trump, who adheres to isolationist policies.
    https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2016-05-01/Blade-Putin-zapugivaet-amerikancev-chtob
    i


    Very soon, the American media will do the same with the United States, as with Ukraine, turn Americans into vegetables, unable to critically analyze ... and for every bad event that will occur in the United States, shout Pu-oo-y ....Russians are coming!!! fool

    Rate what the American media is doing to people, how is it necessary to dodge to come up with a similar heresy -
    The purpose of this intimidation tactic is to make us threaten to choose isolationist like Donald Trump as president. Putin needs the United States to look the other way, while Russia continues to harass its neighbors, including Georgia, Ukraine and the Baltic countries, justifying its actual dictatorship in a country where revanchism has become a new ideology. ”



    I already have agitation ... laughing

    American,and you have already voted for trump?

  6. vovanpain
    vovanpain 1 May 2016 15: 34
    +28
    Quote: Michael67
    They are cowardly.

    That's right. fellow
  7. BarakHuseynovich
    BarakHuseynovich 1 May 2016 17: 52
    +6
    Over the Russian-Canadian border of 1867
    1. D. Dan
      D. Dan 2 May 2016 09: 09
      0
      Outside the empire of 1901. My word is true!
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. sgazeev
    sgazeev 1 May 2016 18: 34
    +2
    Quote: Michael67
    the Amer army will understand what's what, when it gets over the ears and nose.
    They are cowardly.
    And they will never understand the question and answer to it:
    "What is the strength in, brother?
    - In truth. "
    1. Anglorussian
      Anglorussian 1 May 2016 19: 16
      0
      Life is not a movie ...
  • Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 13: 07
    +5
    You’ll probably drive these ... all your holes stink your nose.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Altona
    Altona 1 May 2016 13: 16
    +4
    Quote: cniza
    Maybe from Ukraine and away from our borders, it’s better overseas and let them sit there.

    ---------------------
    Russian lands must be united again. It has always been so, while the outposts near Moscow and Smolensk are weak in Russia.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. PKK
      PKK 1 May 2016 14: 43
      +6
      Russian Lands can be combined to a minimum and to a maximum. By max, this is by Fort Ross itself.
  • Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 1 May 2016 13: 04
    +16
    They also tried to drive off the cockroaches, but something happened, and they left (disappeared) themselves. My opinion: you do not need to drive them away, but you need to blow up the parasite from the inside. The technology of color revolutions is an example to us.
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 13: 12
      +4
      Voooot! You have a bright head! hi The saber-rattling is fine, but no one canceled the partisan activity! Goebbels, although a fascist, was by no means stupid. Propaganda is a great thing, sometimes worse than real weapons
      1. Abbra
        Abbra 1 May 2016 13: 42
        +6
        Freedom TEXAS !!!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. sever.56
      sever.56 1 May 2016 13: 23
      +22
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      My opinion: you do not need to drive them away, but you need to blow up the parasite from the inside. The technology of color revolutions is an example to us.

      Who is there to "blow up"? Commoners, with rare exceptions, who have the right to be called "Homo Sapiens" ??? For whom hamburger, lollipop, soap operas and action films are symbols of prosperity and prosperity? The height of happiness for the overwhelming majority of US citizens is their own house, insurance and a full refrigerator of beer and steaks. Hundreds of years of competent policy of oligarchs and state presidents have raised Americans as an obedient herd of sheep and other domestic animals, which need nothing but a feeding trough filled with grub.
      There is no American nation, people, as a single community. There are hundreds of millions of consumers who care about who is in power and what power is doing. Their idol is their own well-being and full stomach.
      States degenerate as an intellectual nation. All discoveries and inventions in the USA are made by talents who have come there from all over the world. Not a single scientist who is considered a Native American is on the list of those who can boast of one or another discovery in recent years. The empire will collapse soon. We must be afraid of one thing - so that by appropriating death, she could not pull into the next world and the rest of the world.
      1. Denis Obukhov
        Denis Obukhov 1 May 2016 15: 03
        +3
        Quote: sever.56
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        My opinion: you do not need to drive them away, but you need to blow up the parasite from the inside. The technology of color revolutions is an example to us.

        Who is there to "blow up"? Commoners, with rare exceptions, who have the right to be called "Homo Sapiens" ??? For whom hamburger, lollipop, soap operas and action films are symbols of prosperity and prosperity? The height of happiness for the overwhelming majority of US citizens is their own house, insurance and a full refrigerator of beer and steaks. Hundreds of years of competent policy of oligarchs and state presidents have raised Americans as an obedient herd of sheep and other domestic animals, which need nothing but a feeding trough filled with grub.
        There is no American nation, people, as a single community. There are hundreds of millions of consumers who care about who is in power and what power is doing. Their idol is their own well-being and full stomach.
        States degenerate as an intellectual nation. All discoveries and inventions in the USA are made by talents who have come there from all over the world. Not a single scientist who is considered a Native American is on the list of those who can boast of one or another discovery in recent years. The empire will collapse soon. We must be afraid of one thing - so that by appropriating death, she could not pull into the next world and the rest of the world.





        It is necessary to create units of specially trained human rights defenders, which could advance to those parts of the West where centers of tension are forming between the people and the authorities. For example, our human rights defenders could support those who rebelled against police killings of black teenagers in Ferguson. They would bring them Tula gingerbread and instructions for making Molotov cocktails ... they would teach them how to burn tires .. then Obama's bloody regime could not resist.
        1. 11 black
          11 black 1 May 2016 15: 59
          +7
          Quote: Denis Obukhov
          It is necessary to create units of specially trained human rights defenders, which could advance to those parts of the West where centers of tension are forming between the people and the authorities. For example, our human rights defenders could support those who rebelled against police killings of black teenagers in Ferguson. They would bring them Tula gingerbread and instructions for making Molotov cocktails ... they would teach them how to burn tires .. then Obama's bloody regime could not resist.

          That's just the point - Americans are not Ukrainians, they will not stand on ceremony. Yanukovych had a chance at the very beginning to disperse this Maidan, did not. And Americans, albeit gov-nu-ki, are not fools ... right away



          And the rally immediately resolved laughing
      2. EvgNik
        EvgNik 1 May 2016 18: 21
        +4
        Quote: sever.56
        States degenerate as an intellectual nation.

        So we need to be afraid of this, and do everything possible so as not to become like that.
    4. weksha50
      weksha50 1 May 2016 15: 16
      +2
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      but you need to explode the parasite from the inside. The technology of color revolutions is an example to us.



      It’s hard to even figure out which technology and ideology can explode a snickering society ...

      As Vietnam, Korea and many other conflicts have shown, their society partially "explodes" at the sight of coffins under the US flag ... However, it does not explode to such an extent as to destroy the state ...
      1. BMP-2
        BMP-2 1 May 2016 16: 03
        +6
        Quote: weksha50
        It’s hard to even figure out which technology and ideology can explode a snickering society ...


        There are always contradictions and dissatisfied people. Even in a snickering society: between snickering and even more snickering. Actually, all the technologies of color "revolutions" are aimed at finding and exacerbating these contradictions.
      2. Signore Tomato
        Signore Tomato 1 May 2016 17: 14
        +8
        Quote: weksha50

        It’s hard to even figure out which technology and ideology can explode a snickering society ...
        .


        And now remember the end of the USSR.
        At first, the well-fed population was given a small shock - they removed food from the shelves. (Stupidly approximate labeled sold out abroad). Then they connected the lousy "intelligentsia" - they started squealing about the clamping of freedom, etc. By the way, the crowd of lousy "intelligentsia" has now turned into wonderful liberals. In the wake of the screeching of lousy intellectuals, the tagged one was able to destroy the entire state. Boriska's drunk just picked up the falling Russia and with the help of a handful of Jews - ("family") did not let the remnants of the Empire creep apart. The only thing that prevented the remnants of the Empire from collapsing was the greed of the "family" - it was easier to rob controlled territories, of which it was desirable to have more. It was not for nothing that the Empirator of All Chukotka climbed on the throne there - everything was already divided.
        And now, I repeat someone’s thought, the Russian army will be kept exactly at the level that will allow maintaining control over Russia's resources in the hands of the ruling elite. So, the more arms rattling around Russia, the more infusions will be in the Army ... Unfortunately, this is a dope.
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 1 May 2016 18: 08
          0
          Quote: Signor Tomato
          And now remember the end of the USSR.


          Almost agree with you ... Why almost?

          Yes, because the comparison of civil society in Russia (and even more so - the USSR) and the USA is simply incorrect ...

          It is difficult to imagine (I repeat) that some force will be able to force the counters in the United States to be empty and thereby outrage this consumer society ... Those same traders will not allow this ... Systems are very different ...

          The thing is about how to make him, this Amerian society, outrage modern politics pursued by the top of the United States ...
    5. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 1 May 2016 16: 47
      0
      The cockroaches left because someone stronger than them turned out to be near them. THIS NATURE is your mother .. The hunters exterminated a strong beast-wolf, jackals multiplied immediately. There will be a strong opponent near the fenders.
    6. EvgNik
      EvgNik 1 May 2016 18: 18
      0
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      They also tried to drive away the cockroaches, but something happened, and they left (disappeared) themselves

      Does anyone have any idea where they went and what is the reason? They said that if something happens they will be the last on Earth and such a bummer ...
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 1 May 2016 19: 09
        +2
        Only REN-TV knows about this .. According to their correspondents, from the neighboring galaxy, cockroaches moved there ...
        Quote: EvgNik
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        They also tried to drive away the cockroaches, but something happened, and they left (disappeared) themselves

        Does anyone have any idea where they went and what is the reason? They said that if something happens they will be the last on Earth and such a bummer ...
    7. D. Dan
      D. Dan 2 May 2016 09: 12
      0
      By the way, as for cockroaches, it seems to me they themselves have not left. This is due to prolonged-action poison gels. With pendo themselves, too, something like this can happen ...;)
  • Altona
    Altona 1 May 2016 13: 15
    +9
    Quote: Dr. Bormental
    There is nothing to litter the Baltic mattress. Here you are not there!

    ----------------------
    "You are not here!" actually. In general, NATO must be squeezed back. Gorbachev opened Pandora's box, allowing Germany to unite. And a united Germany economically swallowed up the entire former CMEA. We need to unite Russia again, without this we will not be able to solve many problems.
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 13: 26
      +8
      Bald - a traitor. And the unification of Russia is what you see? Rejoin the former union republics? This is a utopia .. In my opinion, even if they joined, it would be just leeches for our country. All these when the USSR collapsed left with good potential, which was safely and stolen.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 1 May 2016 14: 06
        +36
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        Bald - a traitor.

        Not only. He also lied all his life. He lied when he climbed the ladder of power, he lied in Germany when, speaking there, he said that he had been fighting communism all his life.
      2. Altona
        Altona 1 May 2016 14: 54
        +3
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        Bald - a traitor. And the unification of Russia is what you see? Rejoin the former union republics? This is utopia ..

        ----------------------
        And what about the union republics? As much as possible to add what is possible in Ukraine, Moldova, Transcaucasia, Kazakhstan, Central Asia. The drawn borders were drawn by people, and people will cancel them.
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 May 2016 15: 56
        +4
        There will be no accession of the former union republics anymore - the train left, the negative attitude towards Russia in them is growing every year.
        1. Platonich
          Platonich 1 May 2016 16: 58
          -4
          Not only that, we will also lose many with our foreign policy! We have already forgotten how to think flexibly: only monetary interests are above all!
          1. Starik. 47
            Starik. 47 1 May 2016 19: 24
            0
            Do not judge by yourself, Platonich!
        2. Asadullah
          Asadullah 1 May 2016 17: 10
          +7
          There will be no accession of the former union republics anymore - the train left, the negative attitude towards Russia in them is growing every year.


          God forbid, any joining. A negative attitude is the attitude of the official authorities. For this attitude has a price and is readily bought in the United States. Hatred of Russia, Russophobia is an excellent product that can be easily sold along with your country. But no one wants to die for the idea of ​​hating Russia and Russians. For this negative is purely virtual. Hatred is born from the used violence, otherwise it bears the character of a declaration. I had a conversation with one paddling pool in a German fast train, at the beginning of the conversation he did not utter the word "put-ler" in any way. I just asked him primitive questions, what exactly is his dissatisfaction with the Russians. The standard set of stamps asked him to expand and confirm with arguments. He tried to formulate something indistinct, but then with a smile he said that I was probably Putin's agent. At the end of our trip, he already called the President of Russia by name. You might think that the most insignificant Asadullah has the gift of persuasion and persuasion, but in fact the induced hatred has no foundation, but a construction made of cardboard. The only thing she can do is lack of empathy. And then, up to certain limits. Moreover, a convinced "cardboard" enemy becomes a true ideological friend.
          1. D. Dan
            D. Dan 2 May 2016 09: 18
            +1
            This is ours !. The insignificant Asadullah HAS the gift of persuasion. Consider one enemy defeated without a fight!
        3. Nonna
          Nonna 4 May 2016 11: 36
          +1
          and there will be no glory to God (affiliation). still not enough to feed these ragged and millions of migrant workers in Russia. There is no work for their people, because you need to pay a social package. Russia has an army and a navy. That is enough.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. weksha50
      weksha50 1 May 2016 15: 19
      +3
      Quote: Altona
      And a united Germany economically swallowed the entire former CMEA.



      Uh-huh ... And now, in "gratitude", it is almost the very first enemy of Russia in Europe ... Well, except that it is ahead of the Psheks and the Baltic states in hatred of the Russian Federation ... Even Nagliya is not good for them .. ...
  • Foresterer
    Foresterer 1 May 2016 13: 19
    +5
    Not a twig should be taken, but a club, and preferably more massive.
  • lukke
    lukke 1 May 2016 14: 03
    +13
    With the Americans, you only need to speak in their language - the language of setting up an unfavorable choice in advance, such as: guys, you won't get out of Ukraine with your bidens - Assad's government troops may not notice your base with special forces, tk. they do not have such accurate data from satellites as we do, and we can simply "forget" to transfer them to them)

    I certainly exaggerate it, but it is necessary to defend the offensive. And we have long been in the dead of defense, everyone is waiting for the enemy to stumble or change his mind, and this rarely happens ...
  • Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 1 May 2016 21: 10
    +4
    Not at all in the subject, but an appeal to the site administrators. Please cancel the "blacklist" option. It turns out that a certain category of users, not differing in adequacy, but differing in pressure and aplomb, brings others into emergency situations and hides from fair questions and objections. Their active presence can be seen from quotes from other users, but it is impossible to approve of their statements due to concealment. This often distorts the general meaning of comments and is a latent form of censorship. I hope that all commentators on VO are equal and that the unwillingness of some to see the comments of others only confirms the existence of a difference of opinion. But hiding objectionable opponents does not add to the fair assessment of the articles presented. I hope for your understanding, sorry for the off top.
  • alexander 2
    alexander 2 2 May 2016 02: 47
    0
    Everything is correct. Only not "to Ukraine", but "from Ukraine"
  • Jan Krumins
    Jan Krumins 2 May 2016 08: 55
    0
    Always beat and beat America everywhere in the face and on the train ...
  • Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 1 May 2016 12: 50
    +7
    Do not just drive away! You need to register a good pendal!
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 1 May 2016 13: 09
      +2
      "In this regard, the newspaper writes," The Pentagon intends to develop high-tech "invisible" weapons, such as the B-21 bomber. "Also, the US military is working to" improve the technological level of its allies, "primarily Britain."
      Oh, and I don’t know what about the "invisible, inaudible and other weapons" And in London, in which case, right along the Thames under the Big Ben "Status 6" bully
      1. NHKp
        NHKp 1 May 2016 13: 37
        -21%
        What does it mean to plant? The number of nuclear warheads in Britain is such in the event of a nuclear conflict, it will also destroy Russia. Do not even attract the United States.
        1. inferno_nv
          inferno_nv 1 May 2016 14: 14
          +19
          Yes, what are you? You represent the territory of the Russian Federation and what number of nuclear weapons must be rewarded for the destruction of the Russian Federation? But the Britons have them all in the region of 230 pieces, and tell me please. Do you seriously think that this is enough to destroy the Russian Federation? Or do you think that the RF Armed Forces will just sit and watch how they all fly to the RF and that's it? You are in your mind, dear, you may need to think a little before writing !!! fool
          1. NHKp
            NHKp 1 May 2016 14: 27
            -7
            And you suppose not enough? This is even more than necessary. No one has canceled the nuclear infection. Of course, we will destroy Britain too.
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 1 May 2016 15: 42
            -4
            Unfortunately, with these warheads flying in us, our anti-aircraft defense will not do anything - only Moscow has missile defense - the maximum that it can bring down 30 to 40 warheads - in which case the UK can increase the number of warheads on Trident 2 missiles from 3 to 8-14 on a rocket - the United States will put warheads on them if necessary, and Great Britain and Russia have not signed START treaties.
            1. NHKp
              NHKp 1 May 2016 16: 02
              -7
              I doubt that our anti-aircraft defense will bring down a ballistic missile. Even 2 fallen 100 kt warheads to Moscow and St. Petersburg will cause such damage that it is scary to think about turning these areas into Pripyat.
              1. alexander 2
                alexander 2 2 May 2016 02: 55
                0
                In the event of a nuclear war, the whole Earth will turn into Pripyat, and maybe even worse. And don’t talk about a local nuclear war, when all ALL nuclear weapons will be used.
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 3 May 2016 17: 05
                  0
                  The earth will definitely not become Pripyat, since it has already survived 2500 atomic and hydrogen explosions - some of these explosions were equal in power to 100 Topol M missiles - as you can see, the "Ball" is alive.
            2. inferno_nv
              inferno_nv 1 May 2016 17: 16
              +2
              Quote: Vadim237
              in which case the UK may increase the number of warheads on Trident 2 missiles from 3 to 8-14 on a missile

              For some reason, it seems to me that they will no longer have time for this, because if kneading begins with the use of nuclear weapons, then in a few hours no one will go anywhere or conduct anything! hi
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 1 May 2016 18: 58
                +3
                And who said that they will not do this in peacetime - in 2018 they are planning to modernize Trident 2 ICBMs, then they can add a supplement to the quiet one - I repeat - we have no START treaty with Great Britain - so they can have armed with as many warheads as they like.
            3. godofwar6699
              godofwar6699 1 May 2016 21: 16
              +2
              blah blah no action
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 2 May 2016 10: 16
                0
                To energize such a gun, superionistors are needed.
          3. Anglorussian
            Anglorussian 1 May 2016 16: 21
            +4
            Total leash 230? These are 230 (minimum 180) destroyed cities.
            maybe you need to think a bit before writing!
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 1 May 2016 16: 32
              +1
              These warheads will fly to our military facilities and control centers.
              1. Anglorussian
                Anglorussian 1 May 2016 16: 54
                +1
                Most likely in large and medium-sized cities, so as to destroy communications, energy supply and coolly break the will to resist.
                1. vovanpain
                  vovanpain 1 May 2016 18: 04
                  +12
                  Quote: Anglorussian
                  Most likely in large and medium-sized cities, so as to destroy communications, energy supply and coolly break the will to resist.

                  What you wrote also applies to London, Liverpool, Manchester, etc. Do you need it?
                  Quote: Anglorussian
                  Total leash 230? These are 230 (minimum 180) destroyed cities.

                  Russia has only 1560 (I can be mistaken, do not exact) Calculate how many cities are these yourself? And again I repeat the question - Do you need it?
                  Quote: inferno_nv
                  You represent the territory of the Russian Federation and what number of nuclear weapons must be awarded for the destruction of the Russian Federation

                  Good idea. hi
                  Quote: NHKp
                  There the Chinese will welcome us with a warm welcome.

                  There you will be greeted by Russians with even warmer receptions. Thick trolling.
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  War in itself is a futile thing.

                  At least one healthy thought means not all is lost.
                  1. NHKp
                    NHKp 1 May 2016 18: 36
                    0
                    If you didn’t read carefully the argument began with the fact that we will plant status-6 on the big ben (observer 2014. And no one said that Britain will survive. But Russia will also be enough of their blow. And then how many you will kill the children of our Duma deputies if you hit London
                    1. vovanpain
                      vovanpain 1 May 2016 18: 48
                      +10
                      Quote: NHKp
                      If you have not read carefully

                      Very yes read carefully. yes
                      Quote: NHKp
                      the dispute began with the fact that we will plant status-6 on big ben (observer 2014

                      For Big Ben "Status 6" no one will charge it with all the will, just wash Big Ben along with London.
                      Quote: NHKp
                      But Russia will also have enough of their blow
                      Undoubtedly, Russia will also get it, therefore, in your dispute, the respected most reasonable comment.
                      Quote: Vadim237
                      War in itself is a futile thing.

                      hi
                    2. vovanpain
                      vovanpain 1 May 2016 18: 59
                      +11
                      Quote: NHKp
                      And then how many you will kill the children of the deputies of our Duma, if you hit London

                      Me? Not a single one. request Well, I have no Status6, no nuclear warhead, no nuclear button. So excuse none. request
                    3. inferno_nv
                      inferno_nv 1 May 2016 20: 35
                      -1
                      Quote: NHKp
                      then how many will you kill the children of the deputies of our Duma, if you hit London

                      Are you so worried about the children of the deputies? Are you by any chance not a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation?)))
                  2. Anglorussian
                    Anglorussian 1 May 2016 19: 19
                    +2
                    Just like a North Korean war baby doll
                    Do you need it?
                    1. vovanpain
                      vovanpain 1 May 2016 19: 31
                      +9
                      Quote: Anglorussian
                      Just like a North Korean war baby doll

                      Yeah, here he is sitting next to us, drinking vodka, for May 1 and Easter. laughing So it looks like you don’t need it, well, we don’t need it. So what is the argument? request
                      1. Anglorussian
                        Anglorussian 1 May 2016 20: 00
                        +2
                        Initially, the dispute was about the correctness of the thesis that Britain’s nuclear arsenals can be neglected due to their insignificant numbers.
                        it seems you don’t need it, well, we don’t
                      2. inferno_nv
                        inferno_nv 1 May 2016 20: 27
                        -1
                        It is not necessary to neglect, it is necessary to act in advance! A landmine in London can solve many world problems at once! All Anglo-Saxon burn in hell! am
                      3. Anglorussian
                        Anglorussian 1 May 2016 20: 34
                        +2
                        Denied a visa?
                        All Anglo-Saxon burn in hell!
                      4. inferno_nv
                        inferno_nv 1 May 2016 20: 44
                        -1
                        When I never tried to go into this hole, I’d better on Lake Baikal, in the forests of Western Siberia and in the steppes of Ukraine! England is the chirium on the body of our planet and it was time to put them in. angry
                      5. NHKp
                        NHKp 1 May 2016 21: 00
                        0
                        Why are you and what?
                      6. inferno_nv
                        inferno_nv 2 May 2016 13: 15
                        0
                        There is no bigfoot, I am a man and rest in untouched nature is 100000 times cooler than any club, city and all other entertainments for plebs. Debauchery, drugs and rock and roll - this is probably your motto imposed by the Anglo-Saxons to corrupt our youth and destroy the entire Slavic nation, and you can continue to go to clubs stinking of venal girls, drug addicts and squalor! And nature is clean air, water, fish, game, mental relaxation and health! hi So which of us yeti still need to think!
                      7. Anglorussian
                        Anglorussian 2 May 2016 14: 40
                        0
                        And I thought why the untouched nature is no longer left ..
                        I am a man and rest in untouched nature
                      8. inferno_nv
                        inferno_nv 2 May 2016 21: 33
                        -1
                        At you there on the island she definitely did not remain!
                      9. Anglorussian
                        Anglorussian 2 May 2016 22: 17
                        0
                        Lake district, Highlands? belay
              2. Anglorussian
                Anglorussian 1 May 2016 21: 13
                -1
                And how do you know what is better if you have not seen?
                it’s time to put them in.
                Or maybe they should learn something? hi
              3. inferno_nv
                inferno_nv 2 May 2016 13: 25
                -1
                I have not seen, but I know that there is no nature better than we have anywhere! What is learning from them? Betrayal, duplicity, greed, lies, murder out of tishka, scams in foreign states, seizure of colonies, etc.? What exactly can we learn from them. The only good thing that the Anglo-Saxons gave to the world is football and Shakespeare! Everything else is basta, otherwise their whole story is lies, dirt, blood, betrayal, murders (even of members of the royal family), Princess Di and that was filled up by the order of the queen of the goofy !!! If you want to study, but we do not need this, but for all their sins in front of us, they will receive, read more respected, read Bismarck, he has written a lot about Russians and Russia. “Do not hope that once you take advantage of Russia's weakness, you will receive dividends forever. Russians always come for their money. And when they come, do not rely on the Jesuit agreements that you signed, supposedly supporting you. They are not worth the paper on which they are written. Therefore, it is worth either playing fair with the Russians, or not playing at all. " - Otto von Bismarck. hi
              4. Anglorussian
                Anglorussian 2 May 2016 14: 38
                -1
                What is worth learning? The construction of roads, the provision of medical care, the care of the environment, the construction of automobiles, the provision of housing for citizens, and in short, a lot of things. Every 4 minutes in the world, an airplane rises in the air on RollsRoyce turbines - how is import substitution?
                What is learning from them?

                I have not read but condemn. belay
                I have not seen, but I know
              5. inferno_nv
                inferno_nv 2 May 2016 21: 23
                -1
                Do Britons give a living space for free to people? And when did it start? Is medical care the same without a fee? For babosy we are no worse, but in some ways better !!! Caring for the environment? Anglo-nipples do not pollute the environment, come on, have they fulfilled at least one emission agreement, and indeed they signed it? Where is their constitution? Where do they have the rights of the ethnic minorities they seized? Where is the democracy they shout about at every corner? Sit in your England and sit, but we don’t need to be taught, we are like a thread without your peers and sirs! We learn and lay down the road, etc. And why should we learn from them, and not they from us? Maybe they were the first to fly into space? Maybe they won the Second World War (2m)? Or maybe you will recall their duplicity during the 2nd World War! Maybe they need to learn from us kindness, openness, honesty, etc.! And so the idiots who consider themselves world rulers 200 years ago did not wash for years, went under their own armor, helped pour on the streets of London! This is learning from these handshakers, thank you that the Slavs taught them how to wash, otherwise they would still be sprinkled with ashes! Good luck there on the foggy island, I hope he drowns soon! tongue
              6. Anglorussian
                Anglorussian 2 May 2016 22: 09
                0
                Give. In recent years, the truth is more difficult - there are too many people who want to use the system, but yes, there have been entire quarters of social housing here and it has been the last 50 years. Medical service is free, of high quality and not only in London, in any village. True, worse than it was before and the queue is bigger, but still not bad. The constitution in the cradle of the established traditionalist system is uncritical. The rights of ethnic minorities are respected even very well - they are already hanging legs hanging on their necks. You can drink water from Thames and the water of the seas can be seen in depth 40 meters. However, wait until Albion drowns, the dollar turns into paper and China becomes fraternal forever. Wait.
                Good luck there on the foggy island, I hope he drowns soon!
              7. Anglorussian
                Anglorussian 2 May 2016 22: 25
                0
                200 years ago, steam locomotives already rode here at all, and instead of armor, gentlemen wore a three-piece suit. Eto USE so turns brains?
                200 years ago did not wash for years
                The British bought up half of London. Or do we believe in fairy tales that a handful of rich people will buy up a 10 million megalopolis? A significant part of central London belongs to aristocratic clans, by the way, including the royal family.
              8. inferno_nv
                inferno_nv 3 May 2016 12: 00
                0
                Well, here's a map with the railway tracks of Europe and Russia.
                Illustration from the Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron (1890-1907)
                The first railway line opened in England Manchester - Liverpool is 1830, in Russia the first railway line is St. Petersburg-Tsarskoye Selo 1837, by 1851 St. Petersburg-Moscow, and by 1862 Petersburg - Warsaw
                So by 1907 there were many and many ways on backward island in Russia, even if they had begun earlier, but with the continuation there were clearly strains! In my time, the exam was not respected and if you refer someone else to the exam, at least the age would recognize the opponent.
                And the rest with you, everything is clear - for you, England is all the best and most advanced, well, Russia is such a backward country and there wasn’t anything in it, enlightened Europe gave us everything, but you think we are for backward savages they ride the streets on bears and drink vodka in buckets! Good luck half shaving!
          4. inferno_nv
            inferno_nv 2 May 2016 21: 30
            0
            Every 4 minutes in the world an airplane rises in the air on RollsRoyce turbines
            So what? Every second in the world AK shoots - how are the vents with prezoms on the trunk? And by the way, to whom does this Rolls-Royce belong? And who bought up half of the center of London? wassat
            Do they have medical care for free? About the environment, have they signed an emission memorandum? And when did the Britons start giving apartments to the population without a fee? What else? Or maybe they should learn from us, and not teach at every step!
          5. Anglorussian
            Anglorussian 2 May 2016 22: 16
            0
            Rolls (turbine concern) is a joint-stock company, and belongs to anyone who invests money. But almost all of their production is here in England. AK in Nigeria in a car service will do if necessary (and do) and a turbine for Airbus ... providing housing-council housing Medical system-NHS. Google help.
            Or maybe it’s worth learning from us.
          6. inferno_nv
            inferno_nv 3 May 2016 12: 06
            0
            Well, of course they’re making AKs in the basements, but no one can think of better your British occupation forces in Iraq very much like trophy AKs! And the fact that using your roller collapsed in Russia in the 90s, the aviation industry is such a business, but if you didn’t collapse it is not known whose best! And in space, why is your roller not building rockets? And the gut is thin for sure. That's just the United States something buys engines for missiles in the Russian Federation and not from England! hi
          7. Anglorussian
            Anglorussian 3 May 2016 23: 59
            0
            This is bullshit, linden and branchy cranberries. The British acquaintances who served there told me that this was not at all so, if only because it was not prescribed in the charter.
            Iraq really love trophy AK

            And space investments are not paying off, that’s all. Too expensive. Business, however. And yes, it seems that after a radical reconstruction of the Russian road network, you, dear, will remain the only Russian disaster. yes
      2. Anglorussian
        Anglorussian 2 May 2016 23: 14
        0
        AccuracyInternational bully English made
        vents with preziki on the trunk?
        it seems that even the FSB bought them earlier and didn’t soar too much. (Arctic warfare series)
        http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/spetsnaz-weapons.asp
      3. inferno_nv
        inferno_nv 3 May 2016 12: 09
        0
        So at the respected non-machine gun and assault rifle, this is a sniper rifle and the FSB bought them until they adjusted their release, both for near and medium, and long distances, so that is enough to feed your military-industrial complex, we will now provide our orders!
  • Vadim237
    Vadim237 1 May 2016 19: 50
    0
    Then the answer to the question, what the hell is warhead accuracy of 90 meters - if they hit cities?
  • inferno_nv
    inferno_nv 1 May 2016 17: 13
    0
    I just don’t understand what you and your opponent NHKp want to say with your comments? What do we now need permission from the Britons to ask when to go to the toilet, with whom to make friends and trade? After all, they have 230 units of nuclear weapons, oh, I'm afraid, I'm afraid now I will always listen to what the English people say, otherwise God forbid they will shoot at us. But in fact, I had them and everyone who is with them, it is better to live alone than with a bunch of freaks and perverts! Look at the faces of their politicians, Oldbright, the walking corpse of the Queen and her whole family, just a bunch of freaks who need to be put on exhibits in the kuntskamera to scare the children !!! tongue It’s better to let us be afraid, because we are savages with a nuclear club and vodka in our heads tongue , laid down on your whole beloved west a large device from wide pants! Good luck cowards, you can not fart the war will not be! bully
    1. NHKp
      NHKp 1 May 2016 17: 37
      0
      And nobody tells us with whom to trade and with whom not. Whoever wants to trade with us trades. We are on their own, they are on their own. It's just that bravado "we'll hit Big Ben" looks stupid. Well, let's hit it and what will we get from it? They won't.
      1. inferno_nv
        inferno_nv 1 May 2016 20: 24
        0
        Come on)))!!! Almost every day they try to impose their will and rules on the game to us (by the way, the shaving themselves do not follow the rules of the game, their whole story tells about their meanness and vileness). Just the other day, something was blaming over Crimea, human rights in the Russian Federation, etc., so tell me: If they hadn’t been afraid of our nuclear fist, we would have been sitting in warm apartments for a long time, sleeping soundly, etc. d.? Personally, my opinion is that we would have long fought against everyone (USA, NATO, China, etc.). So it’s better to let us have a Mace, Status-6, Kuzkina’s mother and everything else, and to the Anglo-Saxons and their squeals to me from a high mountain, and if this merry-go-round is twisted, then we should be the first to destroy all of Europe for dog fucking. And then we will resolve all the consequences at home, just don’t cover the whole of Russia with either shaving or the French, the only ones who can cause irreparable damage to us are the United States, but they won’t survive if they risk (they have about 300 nuclear power plants in schpend )! hi
        1. NHKp
          NHKp 1 May 2016 20: 52
          +1
          C'mon Kim Jong-un !!!!
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 May 2016 18: 48
      +4
      What I mean is that - there will be a similar reaction to any action - even though we follow them, even though they are according to us.
    3. Anglorussian
      Anglorussian 1 May 2016 21: 25
      +1
      Does the west know about this? Not sure.
      laid down on your whole beloved west
      1. inferno_nv
        inferno_nv 2 May 2016 21: 40
        -1
        And we still know whether they are or not!
        1. Anglorussian
          Anglorussian 2 May 2016 22: 19
          0
          Yes, they are also in common
          does not matter
  • NHKp
    NHKp 1 May 2016 16: 54
    -5
    And France is unlikely to sit and watch with an open mouth how a radioactive cloud goes on them, and this is another 300 warheads
  • Vadim237
    Vadim237 1 May 2016 13: 44
    -11%
    Status 6 - this is a scarecrow for opponents - We will plant on the Thames, and they will plant one hundred and ninety-two nuclear warheads, throughout the European part of Russia within 6-8 minutes.
    1. NHKp
      NHKp 1 May 2016 13: 56
      -16%
      In and let’s go to explore the Far East, they promised a hectare there. There the Chinese will welcome us with a warm welcome.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 May 2016 16: 00
        0
        No, we will not go - here we will rake the ruins and deal with the consequences.
        1. NHKp
          NHKp 1 May 2016 16: 10
          -3
          The most important thing for what. So-so perspective. laughing
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 1 May 2016 16: 28
            +1
            War in itself is a futile thing.
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 May 2016 12: 52
    0
    The publisher, of course, is so-so. And he raises questions with obvious overtones. We need a new arms race, the defense industry is hungry and hungry for money.
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 12: 57
      +5
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The defense industry is hungry and hungry for money.

      Oh oh I'm not special, but judging by the news of the military-industrial complex, our orders are well secured hi At that rate, agriculture was developing ...
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 1 May 2016 13: 23
        +3
        As I understand it, we are talking about the American military-industrial complex. But it is a myth that newspaper articles influence the formation of the military budget. Such strategic issues are resolved by a cohort of the elite and are "fire." the people of America are loyal to government policy.
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 1 May 2016 21: 26
          +3
          Guys, you specifically have already intimidated me! Everything, I went to drink ... Only now I’ll dig up an atomic machine gun ...
          1. Nikoha.2010
            Nikoha.2010 1 May 2016 21: 58
            0
            sabakina! Just hello to you! + drinks
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • yurikh
    yurikh 1 May 2016 12: 54
    +3
    It is high time to drive them away from our borders, otherwise the adversaries have unbelted.
  • krops777
    krops777 1 May 2016 12: 57
    +6
    The Armed Forces of Russia and China are quickly reducing the technical gap from the American army


    It was the Americans who said that we were behind, and the media picked up. Let them amuse themselves with this, underestimating the enemy always led to sad results.
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 1 May 2016 13: 02
      +5
      Quote: krops777
      And who said that we were behind?

      I think this refers to the finances that the country is spending on the defense industry. It is known that the Americans are on the first line here. Only the so-called. the "lag" is very vague. Americans are not war. The jackal is podzabornoye, capable of delivering airstrikes to hospitals, and to saw money on "color" revolutions around the world.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. vip.alex113
      vip.alex113 1 May 2016 19: 22
      0
      Therefore, do not underestimate the Americans, because Hitler was also underestimated at first
  • Panikovsky
    Panikovsky 1 May 2016 12: 57
    +3
    and they’re doing it right, and who does differently with their borders?
  • soroKING
    soroKING 1 May 2016 12: 59
    +1
    "the Chinese can let go a lot" ... I liked it laughing
  • Katman
    Katman 1 May 2016 13: 04
    +5
    Soooo! Submarines as part of air defense !!! ???. Or the translator went through a hangover?
  • grandson of the hero
    grandson of the hero 1 May 2016 13: 04
    +6
    I do not understand, in what clashes did the Amer army take part? Regarding, I mean, with equal opponents, or roughly comparable. Everything is at the level of theory and actions of small sabotage groups. We traveled to Vietnam and Korea to speak on a full-scale basis - they raided them from the partisans. Can Iraq mean? Well then I don’t know ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • pts-m
    pts-m 1 May 2016 13: 08
    +2
    Pendosy and NATO are arrogant, like jackals. So they would like to get into where your dog doesn’t bother. They didn’t try to kill them?
  • Forest
    Forest 1 May 2016 13: 10
    +2
    Another: Give us a couple hundred billion more! Lockheed Martin has pockets full, and we are not averse!
  • techie
    techie 1 May 2016 13: 23
    +2
    What can you say: poor peaceful American armed forces! Already do not show off to them "in the zone of American interests", ie. anywhere in the world. It turns out that the Russian Federation and the PRC also have "zones of interest", which is bad luck! Then you will think about how not to screw up "exclusivity", and not to rake in full under someone else's fence. Here the State Department is needed more than ever, with its "concerns" and "concerns." In a word, it already rolls badly and ..... sit down and eat.))))
  • gabonskijfront
    gabonskijfront 1 May 2016 13: 24
    +9
    Yesterday I went out to sea for cod, chatted on my three-seater PVC machine for 11 hours, four kilometers from the coast. (I took 20 kg), When I ordered an exit to the sea from the frontier guards, I was already three hundred. This is what I mean, I am proud of this glorious band of Kaliningrad sailors, with three-degree water and 5 m. with the wind, for the sake of a dozen fish to plow the gray-haired Baltic. If the destroyer "Donald Cook" would pass nearby, it would be taken on board faster than the Somali pirates of the peaceful shalanda. This people cannot be defeated.
  • Starik72
    Starik72 1 May 2016 13: 44
    +4
    Hey, the top is American and Anglo-Saxon. We don’t shout that the exceptional and the strongest in the world are like you. But if YOU get into US, remember, get it in the teeth, according to the full program, AS IT HAPPENED IN HISTORY more than once!
  • Signaller
    Signaller 1 May 2016 13: 46
    +1
    Well, I think, when the same gauge going to the landfill doesn’t take off from under the keel of which thread Nimitz, they don’t understand the essence of the problem .. Everything simple has already gone far and for a long time. I think so.
  • sir_obs
    sir_obs 1 May 2016 13: 47
    +7
    The Chinese can put so many things into the water


    And we can put so much of everything American under water ...
  • Vadim237
    Vadim237 1 May 2016 13: 49
    +1
    What kind of confrontation is there on the world's oceans - the United States has a fleet of 7 times larger than ours, and in terms of combat power is several tens of times greater than ours.
    1. shinobi
      shinobi 1 May 2016 14: 57
      +2
      So what? Who is going to butts with them in the oceans? Each time the same song. What kind of .. continental power, which can be reached everywhere and without colonial interests in America, is a huge and, in the long run, useless fleet? Times large fleets and ships ended with the launch of the first anti-ship missiles.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 May 2016 15: 46
        0
        And the appearance of missile defense systems on ships minimized the effectiveness of anti-ship missiles.
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 1 May 2016 15: 46
      +5
      Quote: Vadim237
      What kind of confrontation there is on the world's oceans - the US has a fleet 7 times larger than ours, and in terms of combat power several tens times greater than ours.


      Once I was zipped for an answer to a similar comment, but I will try to catch the minuses again ...

      The power of the Amer Navy consists of an AUG and a submarine fleet ... All AUGs are simply huge targets for our nuclear triad ...

      Even if at least one warhead with a capacity of 1 megawatt breaks into the order, consider that the AUG is already not combat-ready ... After all, it is not necessary to drown it all, it is enough to inflict severe damage, plus radiation ...

      I mean our strategic missile forces, not even considering aviation and naval forces ...

      Of the same Kozelsk and Teykovo, the Atlantic is under attack, but the Chita-Orenburg missile armies will provide control over the Pacific Ocean ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 May 2016 16: 10
        0
        Our nuclear triad does not have ICBMs and warheads capable of hitting moving targets, nor do we have systems for detecting carrier formations throughout the oceans - in the event of a nuclear conflict, the United States will withdraw its entire fleet to the oceans and, in this case, it will be out of reach for our missiles.
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 1 May 2016 18: 13
          0
          Quote: Vadim237
          Our nuclear triad does not have ICBMs and warheads capable of hitting moving targets, nor do we have systems for detecting carrier formations throughout the oceans - in the event of a nuclear conflict, the United States will withdraw its entire fleet to the oceans and, in this case, it will be out of reach for our missiles.



          Your untruth ...

          To hit the area ... There is a space grouping that gives target designation ... It doesn’t take such a great time to change the flight mission ... How far will the AUG go in this time ??? Everything will depend on the power of the warhead located on the product ...

          True, there are no such warheads as Cousin's Mom (57 MG) on missiles, but what is there is enough to catch a wave, to create a radiation field in which no electronics will work (that is, AUG weapon control systems ) ...
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 1 May 2016 18: 46
            +2
            The warheads have an astro correction guidance system - with reference to stationary targets - the warhead does not have target tracking systems, we have the Glonass group - it is needed to determine the location, satellites, communications, reconnaissance, but even for reconnaissance satellites to photograph or take something we need a known coordinate point to direct the satellite there, and Russia’s own reconnaissance satellites are only 10 in number, and only 2 missile warning satellites — so we don’t have any means of countering aircraft carrier formations around the globe - and even in the remote no future is foreseen, and Russia still has no megaton warheads in service - in view of the increased accuracy of ICBM warheads, the most powerful warhead we have in service is on the Voevoda missile - 750 kilotons.
        2. sir_obs
          sir_obs 1 May 2016 19: 04
          +1
          In the Greenland Sea, the American AUG attack with torpedoes from SBN was practiced in combat service. Diesel boat of project 641, on brtu 2 torpedoes of 0.8 kilotons each.
          Quietly entered the warrant, went on the attack and virtually launched torpedo launches. Then they left the warrant, no one found us.
          So that there is nothing impossible, the main goal and several associated would be destroyed and damaged significantly.
          Theory and American bragging is fine, but in practice it looks a little different.

          During the Falkland conflict, the Argentines sank the British frigate with one rocket, they didn’t even understand anything. For a long time then they came up with various excuses, as this most modern ship did not even find a rocket, not that there to bring it down.


          And the question is, what do they do there in the ocean? Hide?
          Who are they going to get from there? What is the combat radius of aviation? The point is about an aircraft carrier that is about to hang around there, it’s pretty close to the target, the combat radius is not unlimited, carrier-based aviation has limited capabilities in range and combat load. And if the aircraft carrier is damaged, she needs to sit somewhere, otherwise they fall into the ox.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 1 May 2016 19: 56
            0
            Hide from ICBM strikes, and if the aircraft carrier is damaged, then the world is full of airfields where US Air Force planes can "sit down", and hundreds of their bases in the world will be replenished in the same place.
            1. sir_obs
              sir_obs 1 May 2016 20: 33
              +1
              So the bases will be attacked in parallel with the aircraft carriers and they need to hide in this case, not far from the coast, so that they could fly
              Flight range is limited.

              When starting a dispute about such a confrontation, one should not forget where it started, or they’re kind of hiding and not being found, otherwise their bases are full of places to sit. If they are hiding, then they can’t reach these bases, topoiva is not enough.

              And if they started to fight with aircraft carriers, then this will not be a local conflict, and in fact it may turn out that they have nowhere to go.


              In reality, everything happens a little differently than in the movies.
              The Argentines with one rocket drowned the newest Briton frigate, they did not even find it, not to mention some kind of opposition. Only then did they make excuses for a long time and come up with different excuses, how it so happened.
              Shoot down a cruise missile is not so simple, and even a few from different directions ...

              In order to understand what and how it is necessary to know, at least as a first approximation, the tactics of actions of the diverse forces of the enemy and tactical methods of counteraction to these forces and means.
              Received teleretic knowledge to check and put into practice. And relying on magazine articles by various muddy experts and Hollywood fantasies is not serious.

              Aircraft carrier is rather an attribute of prestige and a scarecrow for natives who do not have the means of destruction that can get it. For an equal opponent, this is just a big target. Not simple, but quite within reach.
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 2 May 2016 10: 31
                0
                Regarding the fact that aviation does not have enough fuel - the United States has a fairly healthy fleet of supply ships - hundreds of thousands of tons of ammunition for food and fuel - and airplanes have outboard fuel tanks and refueling in the air - all airplanes have carrier-based aircraft - we don’t attack all their bases we can, we only have 1648 warheads - based on the calculation of 2 warheads per target, the United States has more than 600 bases in the world, plus add targets here in the United States, plus NATO military bases, none of the sides will launch all of them - ground missiles will be launched and half of the sea will remain in reserve submarines. so that even a quarter of the US and NATO military facilities cannot be hit due to a shortage of warheads - so you have to choose priority targets. Alas, the alignment is far from in our favor.
    3. vip.alex113
      vip.alex113 1 May 2016 19: 37
      +1
      Yes, do not underestimate, but also be afraid - the nifiga is not ours, it will be necessary - we will fight!
  • Tusv
    Tusv 1 May 2016 14: 03
    +7
    “As the Russians said during the Cold War, quantity is also quality. The Chinese can launch so many things so quickly that our technological superiority will be suppressed. ”

    He lies and does not blush. Quantity will grow into quality
    Well, let's start with your "system air defense". With what fright the Masters of the Arctic will attack you from the Pacific Ocean? Can we play checkers? Hence the American defenses are only defending against the Chinese. With what hangover will two traditional powers suddenly attack America? Only for shortening a painful long nose. Sit quietly on your butt and will not be touched
  • opus
    opus 1 May 2016 14: 03
    +14
    Quote: media
    "In particular, Russia is challenging the United States in the Baltic, where it has recently been haunting American ships and aircraft," the publication says.

    mellow.
    Where is the Baltic? and where is the USA?

    Why are we dropping aircraft carriers / cookies in the Gulf of Mexico or scamming 135 over Canada

    The Naval Forces (NSF) of the Department of Defense (MoD) reports today that three Akula-class nuclear submarines belonging to the 24th Northern Fleet Submarine Division (SF) have successfully beaten the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in military tactics by forcing him "run in terror" and hide in UK waters off the coast of Hampshire.

    Hours after the NSF report on this critical incident, interestingly enough, British sources confirmed that this US Navy "100000 tons of firepower" behemoth actually sailed from Stokes Bay in Gosport, stunning thousands of spectators who were stuck on the road and lined up along the shore of Solent to see it. In addition, the port call is described, although none of this was planned.




    According to this NSF report, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, were spotted en route to the Northern Fleet's operational zone, which President Putin put on full alert last week in response to "martial law" when he discovered the threat from the United Kingdom ... The order has been received to disable and withdraw from the game the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt ...
  • Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 1 May 2016 14: 07
    +8
    It is necessary to more actively appeal to natural forces. If the Yellowstone volcano "accidentally" wakes up ...
    Or the San Andreas Fault will come into motion ....
  • Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 1 May 2016 14: 37
    +1
    We will start with China, then with India, Iran and further with all comers ...
  • shinobi
    shinobi 1 May 2016 14: 44
    +2
    The one who wins the war is not the one who has more or better weapons, but the one who can quickly restore his decline as a result of hostilities. A good example of this is World War II. The Reich had the most advanced weapons and economy in the world, which in fact determined the shape and development of the Western model .Russian weapons were many times cheaper and easier to manufacture, later and more perfect. The result is known. The price-quality ratio drives. More recently, in the western version, the price does not imply quality.
  • Yugra
    Yugra 1 May 2016 14: 44
    +8
    The "barrel" over the mattress plane is not all that we can still show ...
  • behemot
    behemot 1 May 2016 14: 51
    +1
    Americans understand only one language - a kick in the teeth with a boot. and they will achieve theirs sooner or later.
  • Sergey333
    Sergey333 1 May 2016 14: 57
    +2
    In this regard, the newspaper writes, "The Pentagon intends to develop high-tech" invisible "weapons, such as the B-21 bomber."

    Well, the flag to them in w * d, let them continue to entertain themselves with the thought of their exclusivity.
  • weksha50
    weksha50 1 May 2016 15: 01
    +3
    "Russia and China are going to drive Americans away from their borders"...

    It is a pity that it is not in the allied treaty-pact ...

    Each of them (Russia and China) pursues both the same and so multidirectional goal ... To understand this, it is enough to read yesterday's article "China - a virtual ally" and a lot of other materials ...

    China is not an ally or friend to us ... It's a pity ... Together we could put the United States in its place, as a "hegemon" and a world gendarme, and, speaking cynically, lower it below the plinth ...

    However, later between us (Russia and China), a struggle for primacy would still have flared up ...
  • Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 May 2016 15: 03
    +3
    The Armed Forces of Russia and China are quickly closing the technical gap with the US Army,

    I would argue with that about the backlog. If Russia embarks on a war footing ... then indeed the Bear will wake up, and Kuzkina’s mother is with him. winkedBut what will become of the geyropa is a question.
    Forgot another concept - Love for the MOTHERLAND.
  • Dezinto
    Dezinto 1 May 2016 15: 07
    +14
    I also liked it - Russia does not give us peace in the Baltic !!! ..... cool! just straight - offset.

    They have this rhetoric directly refined. - when the statement sounds so - your jaw just drops.

    On the moon, Russia does not bother us? not? And then you never know ... maybe dashing Russian pilots flew dangerously close to the American Moon? .... and in an unprofessional manner they flipped their wings over the American flag ....

    Trandec pancake. Statements are one better than the other.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. CORNET
      CORNET 1 May 2016 15: 47
      +4
      Quote: DEZINTO
      I also liked it - Russia does not give us peace in the Baltic !!! ..... cool! just straight - offset.

      In the Baltic we drive not only the Yankees, but we squeeze their mongers economically and morally ..!
      The officially designated state policy has opened new horizons, in particular, in front of the ports of Vyborg, Ust-Luga, Primorsk, Vysotsk, at the same time putting an end to the interests of the sea trade ports of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

      According to the head of Rosmorrechflot Viktor Olersky, over the past five years alone, the average increase in the throughput capacity of Russian ports amounted to 20 million tons per year, and in 2016 their capacity is planned to increase by another 32 million tons.

      So gentlemen of the Baltic states, and this is just the beginning!
      The Latvian Ministry of Transport has already knocked out material losses in case of loss of Russian transit. In this case, the Latvian budget will be missed 1,6 billion euros.
      Russophobia is punishable by the ruble!

    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 May 2016 15: 49
      0
      These are not statements - but the nonsense of novice scribblers.
  • Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 1 May 2016 15: 10
    +1
    Groups of "ice axes" - to all our "partners"
  • EvgenSad
    EvgenSad 1 May 2016 15: 14
    0
    Americans shout everything: We must develop invisible aircraft! Fuck you, space is ours!
  • Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 May 2016 15: 19
    +1
    Off topic.
    People, after the advertised VO action, such as a new "engine" on the site, I constantly have glitches (regularly reset). Either I live in Khokhlostan, or the programmers are stupid.
    How are you ? Admins did not write. I decided to ask.
    1. Dezinto
      Dezinto 1 May 2016 15: 30
      0
      I constantly have glitches (regularly discharges


      Valery hi good day. What do discharges mean? He used to fail, well, the design is gone, and today it was - only the text remains. I don’t know what there is for the new engine, - nifiga has not changed laughing
    2. vip.alex113
      vip.alex113 1 May 2016 20: 10
      +1
      I don’t know, everything seems more or less, I’m really, I don’t sit for days on this site, so I visit occasionally, anti-advertising is included - Adblock and Adguard, so nothing prevents
  • Dezinto
    Dezinto 1 May 2016 15: 21
    +3
    You can also offer them for statements - "yesterday a Russian submarine surfaced in the Barents Sea .... - dangerously close to the US borders"! All "FOX news" and "BBC" urgently
  • dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 1 May 2016 15: 37
    +1
    Pour them with green stuff, they will run away!
  • Lucy
    Lucy 1 May 2016 15: 47
    +3
    opus (7)

    Quote: opus
    The Naval Forces (NSF) of the Department of Defense (MoD) reports today that three Akula-class nuclear submarines belonging to the 24th Northern Fleet Submarine Division (SF) have successfully beaten the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in military tactics by forcing him "run in terror" and hide in UK waters off the coast of Hampshire.


    THAT WHAT FOR A CROWD?
    1. opus
      opus 1 May 2016 18: 02
      +3
      Quote: lusya
      THAT WHAT FOR A CROWD?

      Lyuska ....
      This is not "crap".
      It was O: 21 or 27 Mar. November 2015, XNUMX
      --------------------------------------
      we disturb you / them



  • Olegater
    Olegater 1 May 2016 16: 13
    +7
    weksha50
    Russia and China are going to drive Americans away from their borders
    It is a pity that it is not in the allied treaty-pact ...
    Each of them (Russia and China) pursues both the same and so multidirectional goal ... To understand this, it is enough to read yesterday's article "China is a virtual ally" and a lot of other materials ... China is not an ally or friend to us .. It's a pity ... Together we could put the United States, as a hegemon and a world gendarme, in its place, and speaking cynically, lower it below the plinth ...
    However, later between us (Russia and China), a struggle for primacy would still have flared up ...


    I completely agree with YOU (with capital letters). Justify my point of view: after the liberation of China in 1945 from the Japanese invaders, the USSR could count on strong and stable ties. But there is a historical misunderstanding called Khrushch. His debunking of the cult of personality at the congress laid the foundation for mistrust between peoples and politicians. And also the conflict on Damansky Island. Here, in my opinion, it went off. And if we tried to maintain good-neighborliness with the PRC (after the death of IV Stalin) and develop them, then now we would not observe confusion and vacillation in relations. And as the distance from those events was temporarily removed, mistrust and minor conflicts began to grow deeper and deeper between China and Russia. Add here the efforts of mattresses about big and small filth. That's the bottom line. And I will add about the struggle for the championship - in my opinion, there should not be a struggle as such. And here's why: China can keep the world leadership, but for a short time, because for this it is necessary to introduce something new and do it "by hand". But a partnership on an equal footing can be. Add to this the developing countries India and Iran. This is how it is necessary to live on the planet, not to be at enmity, but to cooperate.
  • dvg1959
    dvg1959 1 May 2016 16: 15
    +2
    The process of improving military potential and enhancing military power in Russia is proceeding rapidly. We were convinced that this is a vital process for Russia.
    The day is not far off when all the military facilities of our "partners" will be under our control and will be potential targets. It is impossible not to reckon with this.
  • Abbra
    Abbra 1 May 2016 16: 43
    +1
    Everything is very simple. A Russian plane flies past an American, in which a Chinese man sits. Nearby flies a Chinese fighter, in which a Russian pilot sits. Both make a barrel and friendly wave to the mattress scout. Peace will reign after this for a long time ... lol
  • ed1967ward
    ed1967ward 1 May 2016 16: 49
    +2
    How do Russians interfere with them in the. American. Baltic Sea!
    1. ydjin
      ydjin 1 May 2016 17: 06
      0
      Quote: ed1967ward
      How do Russians interfere with them in the. American. Baltic Sea!

      And the Yankees prevent me from living quietly in the Russian Pacific Ocean! Yes, Yapy next to my Sakhalin decided to live! Can they all crash into dust? Yes, I feel sorry for their illnesses, I'm not a beast. laughing Do not live! Just don't let your nose stick where your male x ... r didn’t. stop
  • iouris
    iouris 1 May 2016 17: 02
    0
    The antagonistic contradiction is that, on the one hand, the United States is the most powerful economy and a military superpower, on the other hand, it is constantly threatened by economic dwarfs with a "torn to shreds economy", and the United States alone cannot eliminate even the banned RF ISIS.
  • masiya
    masiya 1 May 2016 17: 26
    +1
    It's time to drive them with a broom, because they climb everywhere where it is available - the Black Sea, Baltic, Kamchatka, then we'll see ...
  • Vadim12
    Vadim12 1 May 2016 17: 29
    +2
    Russia interferes with the states in the Baltic ??? It’s something they’ve completely lost, Americanos’s idiots.
  • vmo
    vmo 1 May 2016 17: 35
    +2
    Americans understand only one language - a kick in the teeth with a boot. And they got their way.

    Oh how much the Chinese are patient, but they got them. And our time has come to put the bastards in place.
  • swetlana1
    swetlana1 1 May 2016 18: 49
    +7
    Once again I am convinced - You cannot unconditionally trust US officials - they always solve their own problems in conversations, how to "fool public opinion" and knock out financial resources, as well as misinform potential opponents.

    Quote from the article: "According to the deputy head of the Pentagon, Robert Work, the underwater dominance of the Americans is also under threat ... Submarines are becoming more and more quieter and more difficult to detect."

    The deputy head of the Pentogon cannot NOT know that the USA has been actively developing the DSOP program for several years. In accordance with this program, the observation network will cover deep-sea areas, which are characterized by the presence of the so-called “terrestrial sound channel”. Low-frequency sound vibrations from turbines and propellers of submarines, falling into the layer below the sound channel (depending on the properties of water, is located at a depth of about 1000 ... 1200 m), propagate in the horizontal plane over very long distances; while the low noise of the submarines and their presence at depths of up to 600 ... 800 meters (and below) will not save the boat. DSOP involves the development of sensors installed near the bottom of the ocean, which are integrated into a single network. They will be able to continuously monitor the movement of surface and submarines in a vast territory. After the implementation of this program, nuclear submarines will be much more difficult to hide at great depths, where they now prefer to disguise themselves. This will significantly weaken the strategic nuclear forces of US opponents.
    In addition, autonomous ships of the “ACTUV” type may be involved in working with the specified system in addition to anti-submarine defense forces and means. Since 2010 The United States began developing a project of autonomous (without crew) surface anti-submarine ships with fully automatic control "ACTUV". It is planned to use active echolocation as the main means of detecting this complex. The objective of this weapon system is to actively fight or escort submarines.
    1. Shtyn dwarf
      Shtyn dwarf 3 May 2016 16: 29
      +1
      what prevents as a response to the DSOP scattering false emitters around the world Ocean that mimic the sound of the turbines of our submarines?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Winter cherry
      Winter cherry 3 May 2016 21: 32
      +1
      Well, if such information is available to you, then the military of Russia and China, probably, know this))) It is unlikely that the Americans hope to hang noodles on our ears.
  • Arkuda
    Arkuda 1 May 2016 19: 02
    +3
    Quote: cniza
    Maybe from Ukraine and away from our borders, it’s better overseas and let them sit there.

    Sit quietly.
    Christ is Risen!
  • stonks
    stonks 1 May 2016 19: 34
    +2
    Russia and China are going to drive Americans away from their borders

    A completely natural desire.
    And it will be fulfilled.
  • antikilller55
    antikilller55 1 May 2016 20: 43
    +3
    Christ is Risen!!! Drive the cursed by a filthy broom, and even troll them at their own borders, so that they would not lose their mother. All good and positive! soldier
  • Dewy
    Dewy 1 May 2016 21: 02
    +2
    Quote: Comrade Schucher
    Here Merikos believe that they are the dumbbells of the Earth, for them it is true.
    The Russians believe that they pile on the merikos - and this is also true ...
    I agree))) C with the 2nd line)))))
  • renics
    renics 1 May 2016 23: 19
    +3
    B-21 bomber in the form of a flying wing, suitable only as a demonstrator of military power bluff. To carry out strategic tasks, a more significant tool is needed.
  • tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 2 May 2016 04: 30
    +1
    The "truth" of the zvezdanutyh has only one thing - to make money at any cost !!! verge of default, so they have no choice !!!