Military Review

Shamanov: In the near future, the airborne forces will show the public the “Zauralets” artillery system

63
Airborne will soon present to the general public a new 120-mm artillery system "Zauralets", reports MIC with reference to the commander of the troops, Vladimir Shamanov.


120-mm self-propelled gun "Zauralets-D" on the chassis VPK-39373 "Wolf-3"

“In the near future, we will show the artillery system in the framework of the Zauralets development work. This is 120 mm weapon with increased shooting ranges and other characteristics, ”said Shamanov at the opening in the Ryazan Museum stories Airborne troops on the 120 anniversary of the birth of Marshal Zhukov.

The general said that “Zauralets” is being created on the basis of the BMD-4M and the Rakushka armored personnel carrier, which from last year began to enter into service with the Airborne Forces.

The exhibition in Ryazan will last until the end of May.

Photos used:
http://bastion-opk.ru
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 1 May 2016 09: 35
    +24
    There is nothing similar to BMD-4M and "Shell" in the photo.
    1. 111.
      111. 1 May 2016 11: 43
      +5
      pancake on the wolf’s chassis looks very interesting
      1. 111.
        111. 1 May 2016 12: 40
        +31
        a bit off topic))) I found a cool movie with armature ... I didn’t bore it before, I didn’t see it ..
        1. just exp
          just exp 1 May 2016 13: 20
          +2
          seen for a relatively long time. Mouzon fucked me there. wrote the Ufa game composer. Mooze - Damage Warbot.
        2. senima56
          senima56 1 May 2016 17: 23
          +1
          Good movie!
        3. alexmach
          alexmach 1 May 2016 19: 06
          +2
          So what about the thickness of the top sheet then tell me?
        4. SMikhalych
          SMikhalych 2 May 2016 12: 07
          +1
          Quote: 111.
          a bit off topic)

          As bee, also in continuation of the topic "not in the subject" repeat
          And the T-14 manhole cover, judging by the efforts made to it, weighs heavily! Reliable protection good
          Not like the pink tank from Bondarchuk from Inhabited Island: plywood with door hinges fool
          1. 111.
            111. 2 May 2016 19: 23
            +1
            the hatch in my opinion is about 15 cm thick with the dz screen
            1. 111.
              111. 2 May 2016 19: 51
              0
              still kada was looking for information on the thickness of the hatches ... I found the sides ... v-shaped at angles .... not a novelty kanesh but a nice bonus to protection)) like in modern tanks it’s not used anywhere ... the abrams is definitely not.
              1. 111.
                111. 2 May 2016 19: 53
                +1
                Soviet IS 7 had such a side
              2. Evrepid
                Evrepid 3 May 2016 12: 53
                0
                Well, so what does Abrams not have.
                I think that the more hidden defense systems the better.
                Yes, and the beveled side, as you know, will add a little thickness with the same weight. :)
                And since T-14 has a protective armor capsule then this is not superfluous for other systems. And it would be better if the armor capsule was completely isolated from the tank body. So there will be less vibration for the crew and more protection.
              3. johnny
                johnny 3 May 2016 20: 18
                +1
                there is nothing new in this. T-64, T-72, T-80 have the same bevels.
        5. free
          free 3 May 2016 20: 30
          0
          the ending of the video was in the military acceptance about the armature.
    2. vodolaz
      vodolaz 1 May 2016 20: 26
      +4
      They know about our Airborne Forces by deeds, and the Americans only glorify their berets in films.
  2. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 1 May 2016 09: 35
    +36
    It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not in vain that the number is doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted, soon on August 2 all of Europe will leave overseas for a weekend.
    1. max702
      max702 1 May 2016 09: 48
      +20
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not in vain that the number is doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted, soon on August 2 all of Europe will leave overseas for a weekend.

      Turntables would give them a staffing, at least transport .. Would not be superfluous ...
    2. g1v2
      g1v2 1 May 2016 11: 11
      +11
      According to all reports, our airborne forces and marines are becoming the answer to the American striker brigades. That is, mobile troops with a full range of necessary equipment that can be deployed anywhere in the world where it is capable of conducting autonomous actions. Only strikers have equipment on one wheeled chassis, while ours are still different and tracked. Moreover, both the airborne forces and the marines begin to be manned approximately the same. Landing becomes a useful feature, and not the main focus. That is, the main thing is mobility and fast delivery of troops, and not landing behind enemy lines. Unnoticed, but the essence of the airborne forces and its purpose has changed.
      1. trantor
        trantor 1 May 2016 18: 28
        +4
        Quote: g1v2
        Landing becomes a useful feature, and not the main focus. That is, the main thing is mobility and fast delivery of troops, and not landing behind enemy lines. Unnoticed, but the essence of the airborne forces and its purpose has changed.

        Everything new is well forgotten old. And specifically - this is the Soviet Afghan experience in the use of special forces - there have been practically no landing parties from airplanes for 9 years, and not a massive one. All groups were thrown by helicopters. So in addition to the cannons, it would be nice for them to throw helicopters to transport and assault helicopters to suppress and support.

        By the way, the Americans very quickly adopted experience. We, even for objective reasons, but held up.
    3. rubidiy
      rubidiy 1 May 2016 12: 07
      +2
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not for nothing that their numbers are doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted,

      it remains only to understand what to fly on ... The airborne forces are being increased, but there is no transport aviation that would transport this entire crowd. sad

      Quote: g1v2
      According to all reports, our airborne forces and marines are becoming the answer to the American striker brigades.

      Generation EG ... fool maybe it's the other way around?
      1. g1v2
        g1v2 1 May 2016 12: 35
        +4
        Fly on the IL-76MD-90A, which are ordered.
        And, no, not vice versa. Strike brigades were created for other purposes, and those airborne forces that existed in the Soviet doctrine were not.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 1 May 2016 12: 55
          +5
          Quote: rubidiy
          it remains only to understand what to fly on ... The airborne forces are being increased, but there is no transport aviation that would transport this entire crowd.

          ... there was already talk about this ... in the BTA of the Russian Federation there were 26 AN-124 aircraft, 110 Il-76 aircraft ... in case of emergency, another 12 An-124 and 40 Il-76 aircraft in private airlines ... total for one flight to the sky can be raised:
          An-124 38 x 120t. = 4560 tons of cargo or 38 x 880 tsp = 33 tsp
          IL-76 150 x 50 t. = 7500 t. Of cargo or 150 x 245 tsp. = 3 675 tsp.
          Total all sides: 12 060 tons of cargo or 37 115 tsp ... hi
          1. just exp
            just exp 1 May 2016 13: 24
            +3
            or 150 x 245 tsp = 3 675 tsp

            if I were you, I would either buy a math textbook or throw out my calculator.
          2. Inok10
            Inok10 1 May 2016 13: 28
            +13
            P.S. ... the toe is lost, sorry ... rightly so:
            An-124 38 x 120t. = 4560 tons of cargo or 38 x 880 tsp = 33 tsp
            IL-76 150 x 50 t. = 7500 t. Of cargo or 150 x 245 tsp. = 36 750 tsp.
            Total all sides: 12 060 t. cargo or 70 190 tsp ... hi
  3. GeorgeSev85
    GeorgeSev85 1 May 2016 09: 36
    +28
    The device will be good along the way ... and most importantly mobile.

    PS Happy All Friends, greetings from the Crimea.
  4. ahmet
    ahmet 1 May 2016 09: 40
    +7
    Very timely work, mobility and speed of work on goals. "I came, I saw, I inherited" lol
    1. DMB_95
      DMB_95 1 May 2016 12: 52
      +1
      What about "Vienna"? Have you completely refused? It was also a good development.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 1 May 2016 18: 39
        +1
        Quote: DMB_95
        What about "Vienna"? Have you completely refused? It was also a good development.

        Well, the photo to the material is not at all related to the topic. From the article published by http://vpk-news.ru/articles/28605, we can conclude that the new weapon will rather look more like the "Nona", because it provides for shooting in motion and possible from the water surface.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 May 2016 09: 47
    +2
    Airborne will soon show the public artillery system "Zauralets"

    He will show and tell on his fingers (not to be confused with the expansion), who does not understand, they will explain to him separately.
  6. soroKING
    soroKING 1 May 2016 09: 51
    0
    120 years ... 120 mm ... and the gun is probably based on d30 ... and what a smart howitzer, super-shot good
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 1 May 2016 09: 54
    -19%
    So what's so new? Just put the towed gun Nona on the tracks and wheels. Now, if a fully automated howitzer was made like the Swedish Archer.
    1. kolyhalovs
      kolyhalovs 1 May 2016 09: 56
      +26
      Is this bandura landing? belay
      1. Monos
        Monos 1 May 2016 10: 17
        +39
        wassat Yeah, landing. Roughly like the old Humvees. Only more abruptly, the scattering of spare parts will be farther when they hit the ground. laughing
      2. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 1 May 2016 10: 32
        +11
        Quote: kolyhalovs
        Is this bandura landing?

        Yes! But only once. winkThis is me about the Swedes ... laughing
      3. avt
        avt 1 May 2016 11: 21
        +7
        Quote: kolyhalovs
        Is this bandura landing?

        Easy! With a mouse click on the Internet, but at least in another galaxy.
        Quote: Monos
        ... Roughly like the old Humvees. Only abruptly, the scattering of spare parts will be farther when they hit the ground.

        No. Nah! They will immediately throw parts. laughing
        1. kon125
          kon125 1 May 2016 17: 01
          +5
          I’ll clarify. Airborne Hummers are an indicator of the level of the Airborne Forces service of the NATO Armed Forces. Russia in the field of landing of military equipment has overcome some problems of the 90s. And again it has no equal.
          In Syria, during operations against ISIS, at least 50 objects and military equipment were landed. Not a single refusal. I, as a member of the Union of Paratroopers, report.
          Therefore, we don’t need to talk about any flying parts. The Russian Airborne Forces are the best in the world. Our developments and experience in canting cargo from BTA aircraft are recognized by the whole world, they are thrown both in Africa and in Antarctica.
    2. lesnik1978
      lesnik1978 1 May 2016 15: 24
      0
      Your Archer is based on the harvester.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 1 May 2016 18: 24
        +2
        Quote: lesnik1978
        Your Archer is based on the harvester.

        As a chassis for the new self-propelled artillery installation, the Volvo A30D with a 6x6 wheel arrangement was chosen.
        1. fzr1000
          fzr1000 2 May 2016 11: 16
          0
          Dumper is called. In case of "emergency" you can scrape together 250-300 pieces from builders across Russia. Only here spare parts and rubber for it are only imported, expensive.
          1. SMikhalych
            SMikhalych 2 May 2016 12: 14
            0
            Quote: fzr1000
            The dumper is called.

            Sorry - DUMPER, from the English Dump Truck - dump truck hi
    3. TOR2
      TOR2 1 May 2016 20: 47
      0
      For example, I didn't like the Archer's ammunition system. In conditions of a more serious military conflict, it will simply not be possible to replenish ammunition so comfortably.
  8. atamankko
    atamankko 1 May 2016 09: 59
    +3
    From such news the mood rises.
  9. soroKING
    soroKING 1 May 2016 10: 00
    +3
    Quote: kolyhalovs
    Is this bandura landing? belay

    no-because of the urals will shoot wassat
  10. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 1 May 2016 10: 01
    +3
    Everything is relative.
    It would be nice to give the comparative characteristics of our systems with similar foreign advanced systems.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 1 May 2016 10: 16
      +9
      Quote: Pvi1206
      Comparative characteristics of our systems with similar foreign advanced systems.

      There is no such. Generally. Self-propelled guns, which can be parachuted by air, are made only by us.
      1. Denimax
        Denimax 1 May 2016 17: 55
        0
        Quote: Spade
        There is no such. Generally. Self-propelled guns, which can be parachuted by air, are made only by us.

        And why? Maybe a bit heavy for the Airborne Forces? Maybe you should reconsider the concept of airborne forces? As the most mobile and easy connection, the Airborne Forces is very vulnerable to open battles. Partisan tactics with light weapons are best suited for them. Now light weapons have also reached high rates in range and accuracy.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Kibl
    Kibl 1 May 2016 10: 06
    +3
    A good fleet of such airplanes looms!
  13. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 1 May 2016 10: 17
    +10
    Glory to the Airborne Forces !!!
  14. Lopatov
    Lopatov 1 May 2016 10: 26
    +2
    The new ACS is, of course, good. It is high time. But even with the ancient "Rheostat" is, finally, to figure it out.
  15. Tim
    Tim 1 May 2016 10: 43
    +2
    I hope the Airborne Forces have at the moment modern means of communication, during my service there were problems with this, with negative consequences.
  16. mvg
    mvg 1 May 2016 10: 50
    +2
    Only it seems to me that the Il-76D is too "tasty" target to allow it to drop something if there is a serious mess?
  17. tchoni
    tchoni 1 May 2016 11: 15
    +2
    It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not in vain that the number is doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted, soon on August 2 all of Europe will leave overseas for a weekend.
    Unfortunately no. Will not. Because the use of airborne forces is impossible. For a serious war, these troops are too weakly armed. I'm afraid that airborne missions are quick response tasks and sabotage work.
  18. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 1 May 2016 11: 33
    +1
    Quote: tchoni
    It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not in vain that the number is doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted, soon on August 2 all of Europe will leave overseas for a weekend.
    Unfortunately no. Will not. Because the use of airborne forces is impossible. For a serious war, these troops are too weakly armed. I'm afraid that airborne missions are quick response tasks and sabotage work.

    Subversive work is enough! Having violated the water supply, electricity, heat supply systems (especially in winter), lack of communication, especially the Internet, food supply, add the practical absence of your armies, all this is at least EU paralysis
    1. tchoni
      tchoni 1 May 2016 19: 02
      0
      Subversive work in the European Union is basically undercover work (well, there are no track forests where you can partisan). But the airborne forces are not sharpened for this. Soon, under the capture of the enemy’s drg (police functions)
      1. fzr1000
        fzr1000 2 May 2016 11: 21
        0
        Have you been to the foothills of the Alps? You can’t hide an airborne regiment, but we can work with smaller units. But what about the foot marching jabs of the DShB in the time of the GBV from Czechoslovakia to Germany? There is where there to hide.
  19. ups
    ups 1 May 2016 11: 38
    +2
    And why is NONA bad for him?
    1. DMB_95
      DMB_95 1 May 2016 15: 25
      +1
      Nona is a great car. Do they really want to abandon her?
  20. Katman
    Katman 1 May 2016 13: 24
    +2
    Well yes. "Zauralets" to a firing position, and the general public as a target. A "lethal" demonstration will turn out. And all the "killed" will immediately start grabbing "Zauralets" like hot pies with cabbage and hare. Well, if you take into account the words "within the framework of the experimental design", then thank God - everyone is alive.
  21. Ktor
    Ktor 1 May 2016 13: 55
    +3
    The bigger and more modern, the better
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. Lekov L
    Lekov L 1 May 2016 16: 53
    +2
    oleg-gr Today, 09: 35
    There is nothing similar to BMD-4M and "Shell" in the photo.

    News glad a big plus - the article and the author minus.
    The general said that “Zauralets” is being created on the basis of the BMD-4M and the Rakushka armored personnel carrier, which from last year began to enter into service with the Airborne Forces.

    In the illustrations for the article, nothing like the "base" is present.
    Author (by the way did not find references to individuals request ) it was enough to mention in the text that the artillery system in the photo is new, and the base is the one about which Shamanov tells the secret and the photo is not yet available to us.
    "No trousers. Satisfied citizens go home" (c) OSBM Bender
    And so no respect for colleagues - readers. wink
    A curious younger generation will visit the site - so then the boys will shuffle it in the yard, or even worse, we will not believe the "specialists".
    Tighter companions! laughing
    Happy Holidays to you all. Or with two holidays as someone nicer!
    Respectfully..
    And according to None (for UPSa) - so the system itself is different - obviously long-range. Otherwise, why such a powerful muzzle brake?
    1. ICT
      ICT 2 May 2016 07: 28
      +1
      somewhere in Syria, local geniuses pile
  23. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 2 May 2016 07: 28
    +1
    I agree, this is the same weapon, only based on the BMD-4M. Redesigned "Vienna" for the present. The same weapon is used to modernize the Gvozdika self-propelled guns - they replace the D-30 in the turret and add modern communications and topography equipment. The wheeled chassis "Tiger" is very interesting, but for the rapid reaction forces, amphibiousness and the same chassis for the main equipment - "Shell", BMD-4, SPRUT and "Zauralets" are important.
  24. Roxs
    Roxs 2 May 2016 07: 35
    0
    agile, good
  25. loki565
    loki565 2 May 2016 11: 19
    0
    The concept clearly shot back and quickly changed position, but it was necessary to make a drum for 5 shells 1 in the barrel. And while it is released it will be morally obsolete
    1. Shtyn dwarf
      Shtyn dwarf 3 May 2016 17: 58
      0
      It will come down against terrorists, but there is no more sense. There other battle systems will work
  26. twincam
    twincam 3 May 2016 22: 31
    0
    Quote: Dmitry Potapov
    It looks like the Russian Airborne Forces will soon be a nightmare for NATO worse than the Iskander, it is not in vain that the number is doubled and advanced weapons are being adjusted, soon on August 2 all of Europe will leave overseas for a weekend.

    urgent need to build additional fountains)))))