Military Review

The latest robots "Nerekhta" can be armed with grenade launchers and rockets

48
The new Russian military robotic complex "Nerekhta" can get heavier weapon - grenade launcher or anti-tank missiles, transmits TASS Post your source in the DIC.




“The platform has such an opportunity. There can be installed heavier weapons, including grenade and anti-tank, ”said the source.

“So far, autonomous tests of“ Nerekhta ”are being conducted, during which all components and assemblies are checked. Nerekhta also participates in some training events of the Ministry of Defense, during which the military assess the capabilities of the complex, ”he explained.

At present, experimental complexes are armed with machine guns of 7,62 caliber and 12,7 mm. Later, according to the interlocutor, the robot will receive "a more powerful machine gun, which will be created specifically for" Nerekhta "."

He recalled that recently the complex “included an unmanned helicopter TB-29В and an automatic control system for mobile objects and armament SAU-9.0”.

Help Agency: “Nerekhta” is a combat robotic complex developed by the Degtyareva together with the Foundation for Advanced Studies. Tracked platform can be used for reconnaissance, adjustment or firing, as well as transportation of goods. For the first time, the robot was presented at the Innovation Day of the Russian Ministry of Defense in 2015 ”.
Photos used:
http://defence.ru
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 April 30 2016 08: 35
    +10
    The Terminators take to the battlefield. Science fiction turns into reality ...
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 April 30 2016 08: 37
      0
      Why is the name "Nerekhta"? Maybe it comes from the name of the inventor? I knew a professor in medicine, by the name of Nerekhtin. Or the name comes from a city in the Kostroma region. Nerekhty?
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt April 30 2016 08: 45
        +11
        Quote: svp67
        The Terminators take to the battlefield.
        on the battlefield, someone always comes out. The use of the latest technical developments on the battlefield is one of the components of victory over the enemy. True, their "terminators" did not help the Germans, but they thought in the right direction. This cannot be taken away from them in many directions ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Muxauji
        Muxauji April 30 2016 09: 41
        +1
        because the river near the town of Kovrov (where the ZID is located) flows under the name Nerekhta
      4. Nick
        Nick April 30 2016 09: 47
        0
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Why is the name "Nerekhta"? Maybe it comes from the name of the inventor? I knew a professor in medicine, by the name of Nerekhtin. Or the name comes from a city in the Kostroma region. Nerekhty?

        In the Kostroma region there is a river Nerekhta and a settlement
        1. Muxauji
          Muxauji April 30 2016 10: 18
          0
          such a river exists in the Vladimir region
          that characteristically there is also the settlement "Nerekhta"
      5. 11 black
        11 black April 30 2016 11: 34
        +1
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Why is the name "Nerekhta"? Maybe it comes from the name of the inventor? I knew a professor in medicine, by the name of Nerekhtin. Or the name comes from a city in the Kostroma region. Nerekhty?

        Such a river is next to the plant.
        Nerekhta is a wonderful robot, but this is a robot for use in platoons and companies - and this is a very important direction, such a robot, for example, will be able to "shut up" the enemy while the soldiers are pulling the wounded out of the fire, during the assault in the first rows it will go taking fire on itself , while the helicopter will detect the enemy - the necessary technique.
        But we have larger and more terrible examples for creating separate, "unmanned" brigades, as I understand it - this is what the first video is about.
        http://ok.ru/video/44513888888
        And the second - evaluate the reaction rate of Nerekhta - watch from 17 minutes.
        http://ok.ru/video/10721166669
      6. Simple
        Simple April 30 2016 18: 25
        0
        Nerekhta: city, river in Russia
        N: "in the language of the Meryans, it meant" a river in a low, marshy area. " ..
      7. Slavs
        Slavs 1 May 2016 00: 51
        0
        Nerekhta - for domestic use, Atheren - for export)
    2. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg April 30 2016 09: 53
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      The Terminators take to the battlefield. Science fiction turns into reality ...


      These are not terminators, here is something else ... Reminds a full-fledged robotic unit. There are machine guns, there will be grenade launchers, there is a control machine. Two more units are missing - a robotic mortar and a tanker. If competent military algorithms are fastened to them, such issues as the overthrow of the government in Kiev will be resolved in 1-2 days, without the participation of people.
      1. svp67
        svp67 April 30 2016 09: 59
        0
        Quote: Geisenberg
        These are not terminators, here is something else ...

        It depends on how you look at it. After all, the "Terminator" must emerge from something, and this sample is clearly a "test of the pen" of this "something".
    3. vv3
      vv3 April 30 2016 16: 12
      -3
      What kind of fiction? Complete nonsense. You just think about the possibility of combat use. What is a joint battle order, what infantry commander? Useless device without integration into a single combat information field under the control of an operator as part of a combat control center, which we do not have. We do not have the concept of conducting modern warfare and integrated information support for this. When this parade of idiots will stop. UAVs, robots, Armata, Coalition, Tornadoes, T-50 and other means can realize their ultramodern capabilities only as part of a single information system, which no, there’s not even a concept for such a system. ESU TK and the like do not work for it. We cannot fight in modern ways without such systems .... Thank you, there is nuclear weapons, otherwise we would be crushed already ....
      1. VeryBravePiggy
        VeryBravePiggy April 30 2016 19: 24
        +2
        No matter what, there is nothing. And the asses of the American / European mercenaries in Syria and / on urkain, however, someone is pushing. And drones are planting, and data is being dug. Obviously, these are the last surviving rabid Soviet kajibi agents.
        Iksperds have always been amazed, discussing the presence / absence of the top secret state management systems in the largest state in the world. Moreover, the presence / absence of such systems is judged by these seasoned techno-seers apparently only by the presence in the media of information about such systems. Or according to the comments of the demobilization, who at the time of the service type did not see anything in the army, except for scrap, felt boots and BSL-2 (large shovels).
        1. vv3
          vv3 2 May 2016 09: 12
          0
          Yeah, at 41 they said that the Red Army is the strongest of all, like you. Our ability to wage a modern war using information technology at the level of 41 years ... And I still don't understand who you kicked something. There is no result. How many tens of thousands of Syrian military and non-military should die due to the fact that "senior brother "does not know how to conduct modern war?
  2. sober
    sober April 30 2016 08: 38
    +3
    Yes, one shelling and a transdean to this tractor !!! what is it there ..? would be something worthwhile would have classified the truth !!! as an armature. but someone showed where the money was poured !!!!! and what is going to fly right now minus ????
    1. crumb
      crumb April 30 2016 08: 46
      +13
      and didn’t try to include your head, in your opinion it’s better to lose people than a piece of iron ?????
      1. Bongo
        Bongo April 30 2016 08: 51
        +5
        Quote: croche
        Yes, one shelling and transdec to this tractor !!


        These vehicles are certainly not for combined arms combat - they are too vulnerable and expensive. But they are quite suitable for solving "special" tasks like reconnaissance in the area of ​​CTO and demining.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov April 30 2016 09: 21
          +3
          Quote: Bongo
          These machines are certainly not for combined arms combat

          It depends on which version. For example, in a configuration with an artillery reconnaissance module — specifically for combined arms combat.
          1. Bongo
            Bongo April 30 2016 09: 30
            +4
            Quote: Spade
            It depends on which version. For example, in a configuration with an artillery reconnaissance module — specifically for combined arms combat.

            Which module do you mean taking into account the load capacity of the machine? what


            Even the most compact western models are located at least on cross-country vehicles with a load capacity of at least 1,5 tons.



            We usually do it on a crawler chassis MT-LB, BMP or BMD.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov April 30 2016 09: 34
              +2
              Quote: Bongo
              Which module do you mean taking into account the load capacity of the machine?
              1. Bongo
                Bongo April 30 2016 09: 38
                +1
                And the characteristics of this device can be found?
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov April 30 2016 09: 51
                  +4
                  They are still silent.

                  One important thing should be understood here, there is no ready-made complex at the moment, only in essence a concept. Even with the "base chassis" not fully decided. For example, recently RTK received the control system "SAU 9.0" from "Tiber"
                  http://www.tiber.su/

                  So far "Nerekhta" is a complex with a rapidly changing "payload". Which can work in three versions - fire support, reconnaissance and transport. In the future, apparently, and also ATGM. Also, by the way, a popular piece in combined arms combat.
            2. Lopatov
              Lopatov April 30 2016 09: 39
              +1
              Quote: Bongo
              We usually do it on a crawler chassis MT-LB, BMP or BMD.

              Because it is necessary to provide places for officials. At least three: commander, intelligence operator, and radiotelephone operator
              1. Bongo
                Bongo April 30 2016 09: 40
                +3
                Quote: Spade
                Because it is necessary to provide places for officials. At least three: commander, intelligence operator, and radiotelephone operator


                Well, why should I chew it?
                In addition to the calculation, it is necessary to place a rather big one complex means of observation and communication, as well as to ensure acceptable living conditions during long-term combat operations. In addition, the "unmanned" vehicle does not have the necessary autonomy, speed of movement and maneuverability for actions in the same order as tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and self-propelled guns.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov April 30 2016 10: 09
                  +1
                  Quote: Bongo
                  In addition to the calculation, it is also necessary to place a set of surveillance tools

                  Take, for example, the PRP. This complex differs from this machine only in the absence of a radar. Which, by the way, the smart commander will also use with the removal, so as not to unmask.

                  That is, one robot is no different in terms of the possibility of conducting optical reconnaissance from the PRP, and two robots are superior in head configuration PRP + remote point

                  Quote: Bongo
                  and communication

                  Why would a robot keep in touch on several channels? There is a control machine for this.


                  Quote: Bongo
                  In addition, the "unmanned" vehicle does not have the necessary autonomy, speed of movement and maneuverability for actions in the same order as tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and self-propelled guns.

                  I would not say. An unmanned vehicle has an advantage in terms of safety for officials. And the rest is quite consistent.
                2. zyablik.olga
                  zyablik.olga April 30 2016 12: 01
                  +3
                  Quote: Bongo
                  In addition to the calculation, it is also necessary to place a rather large set of monitoring and communications equipment

                  It is impossible to provide in such dimensions a full-fledged complex of even optical devices. No. Of course, this machine will not be able to engage in full-fledged artillery reconnaissance, but it is quite capable of conducting visual reconnaissance in "conflicts of low intensity". yes
                  1. Simple
                    Simple April 30 2016 16: 21
                    0
                    Quote: zyablik.olga
                    It is impossible to provide in such dimensions a full-fledged complex of even optical devices.



                    Why did you all attack this poor robot?


                    Why put eggs in one basket? An advantage in robotic systems, among other things, is the creation of a complex of several devices by distributing equipment with a lower resolution.
        2. g1v2
          g1v2 April 30 2016 13: 58
          +2
          A man with a machine gun is even more vulnerable and expensive. wink To reinforce infantry units with all kinds of drones, this is quite logical. For example, attach to the same mobile units of the Airborne Forces or Marines. The cost depends on the quantity produced. If you make piece copies, then the Kalashnikov assault rifle is expensive, and if you put it on stream, then with the increase in purchases the price of an individual product drops sharply. In the future, we are clearly waiting for the saturation of the infantry with all kinds of drones - reconnaissance, fire amplification and even transport. Stupidly - load a small transport drone bp and give to the group. How much does a fighter take on? And each time a choice - either BC or grub and other necessary equipment. And how many fighter will take cartridges to a machine gun or charges to an RPG? Well, here - a small inconspicuous warehouse behind the group can be empty, plus a firing point, which can be sacrificed if the evening has ceased to be languid and you need to tear your claws, leaving cover. In my opinion this is a very useful thing. hi
      2. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt April 30 2016 08: 54
        +7
        The first steps are always simple and not intricate. But stopping in the development of robotics means giving the initiative to the enemy and in a decade their robots will dance on the battlefield, and we will have to withstand soldiers' lives with techniques equipped with advanced sensors and tactical algorithms.
      3. 11 black
        11 black April 30 2016 13: 26
        +3
        Quote: sober
        Yes, one shelling and a transdean to this tractor !!! what is it there ..? would be something worthwhile would have classified the truth !!! as an armature. but someone showed where the money was poured !!!!! and what is going to fly right now minus ????

        And how do you destroy it then? One shelling from what - from the "Topol-M" chtoli?
        He has bulletproof armor, in size it is smaller than the Oka, very mobile and passable.
        You won’t get from RPGs, you won’t capture the target from Javelin / Cornet / Spike, it makes no sense to shoot from machine guns - it is not so simple as it seems.
        For example, the situation is familiar to every soldier. There is our detachment (let it be "Detachment 1"), it is in an excellent position, but it is cut off from our rear (that is, from the supply) by an enemy-fired platform, but the enemy cannot knock him out by force and, moreover, does not organize the normal supply of his forward detachments (also the area between them and the rear of the enemy is shot through by Detachment 1).
        In this situation, the enemy simply begins a battle to withdraw the ammunition with the first detachment, after a while the detachment without supply will use them up and the enemy will be able to provide supplies to their advanced units.
        How to deliver ammunition to the First in a shooting range? - Ideal transport version of Nerekhta. Because it is not possible to knock it out from RPGs and ATGMs, and it is very difficult to knock it out from small arms, Nerekht, and even if it succeeds, there will be no human losses - and the First will get ammunition and continue to restrain the enemy, on the way back to Nerekhta (I repeat - transport) will be able to take the wounded out of the first detachment - she has no price in such a situation, and the situation is not uncommon.
        (We are talking about supplying a detachment of up to a company with a group in the 3-4 robot)
    2. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher April 30 2016 08: 51
      +4
      Well, I don’t know, of course ... Standard bullets and splinters will probably withstand ..? Of course, if they plant it with RPGs, that’s all. But this is better than losing a live machine gunner ... And he, the machine gunner-operator, sits far away, hid, they extinguished one robot, rolled out the second ... So five robots were spent, and they lost their positions without losses.
      However, that makes sense. Expensive of course, for some reason people will be more whole ...
    3. Nick
      Nick April 30 2016 09: 52
      +3
      Quote: sober
      Yes, one shelling and a transdean to this tractor !!! what is it there ..? would be something worthwhile would have classified the truth !!! as an armature. but someone showed where the money was poured !!!!! and what is going to fly right now minus ????

      For the lack of mind you minus. In your opinion it is always and everywhere better to substitute a fighter? It's kind of free. Only a soldier does not need shelling. One bullet of 5,45 caliber is enough, if not a fragment of a hand grenade ...
    4. VeryBravePiggy
      VeryBravePiggy April 30 2016 15: 32
      +4
      Spring Fever? Any tank is a tractor. 1 ATGM - and Khan to almost any tractor. 1 bullet - and khan to any person. You can not use people! Im khan from 1 bullet!

      Another sofa tactic. Scrub the new car, and at the same time upload a video where the car shows itself quite well (even if only in terms of carrying capacity, cross-country ability and maneuverability) - apofigee cretinism.

      Nick - we think about the same thing.
  3. demiurg
    demiurg April 30 2016 08: 45
    +1
    This is not a robot, from the word at all. This is a radio-controlled machine. So the revolt of the machines is canceled. Teletanks were in the USSR in the year 27, sort of. What to brag about?
    I would understand the reason for the article if he autonomously myself made decisions where to crawl, and what to hit.
    In 1978, I had a radio-controlled machine (to be honest with wires) to fasten something firing (a slingshot) to it and what, nanotechnologies?
    1. krops777
      krops777 April 30 2016 08: 55
      +3
      By the way, the autonomous operation of these machines is also promised.
      In general, the machine is good, they will bring to mind over time.
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov April 30 2016 09: 18
      +6
      If at least one function of the machine works automatically, without the participation of the operator, then this is the most robotic complex.
    3. Nick
      Nick April 30 2016 17: 33
      +3
      Quote: demiurg
      In 1978, I had a radio-controlled machine (to be honest with wires) to fasten something firing (a slingshot) to it and what, nanotechnologies?

      And you obviously have no idea what nanotechnology is.
      Do not try to judge what you do not understand without shisha. Learn the materiel to get started.
  4. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher April 30 2016 08: 46
    +4
    "At present, the experimental complexes are armed with machine guns of 7,62 and 12,7 mm. Later, according to the interlocutor, the robot will receive" a more powerful machine gun. "

    What is this? 14,5 or what? belay Type, self-propelled machine for KPVT?
  5. sober
    sober April 30 2016 08: 50
    -5
    YES AND GENERALLY RIGHT REMOTE CONTROL - last century !!! Right now, INTELLIGENT ROBOTS NEEDED !!!!!!
    1. svp67
      svp67 April 30 2016 08: 59
      +6
      Quote: sober
      YES AND GENERALLY RIGHT REMOTE CONTROL - last century !!! Right now, INTELLIGENT ROBOTS NEEDED !!!!!!

      And why is it so small, you need to immediately create a STAR OF DEATH. Do you even understand that everything should go in stages or is it important for you to declare something?
  6. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 30 2016 08: 54
    +1
    Quote: croche
    and didn’t try to include your head, in your opinion it’s better to lose people than a piece of iron ?????

    Quote: sober
    Yes, one shelling and a transdean to this tractor !!! what is it there ..? would be something worthwhile would have classified the truth !!! as an armature. but someone showed where the money was poured !!!!! and what is going to fly right now minus ????

    You shouldn’t be so! The bottom line is to minimize man’s participation in the battle, accordingly reduce personnel losses or avoid them altogether, do you have anything against drones?
  7. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 30 2016 08: 54
    +1
    I’m not sure that such a complex will be in demand in the troops, but the National Guard in the fight against terrorists and the protection of facilities, it can be very useful if equipped normally.
  8. godofwar6699
    godofwar6699 April 30 2016 09: 00
    +1
    Quote: avg-mgn
    I’m not sure that such a complex will be in demand in the troops, but the National Guard in the fight against terrorists and the protection of facilities, it can be very useful if equipped normally.

    I think technology is not yet ready for war
  9. new 2016
    new 2016 April 30 2016 10: 49
    +1
    This is the first step, over time, they will put the computer there, which will make the decisions and the weapons will be very different, look at the evolution of the phone and the car in 10 years, it will also be here, the development direction is set, the goals are set, if they continue to develop, then everything will but for now yes, nothing special
  10. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 April 30 2016 14: 01
    +1
    If you believe M. Kovalchuk, director of the Kurchatov Research Center (and I have no reason not to believe it), then soon we (in Russia) may have the so-called "anthropomorphic self-reproducing systems" - essentially a prototype of a biological supercomputer. Thus, the Russian Federation can to be "ahead of the rest of the planet" (according to Yu. Vizbor) in the development and implementation of combat intelligent systems, when installed on appropriate platforms. In this case, we are just seeing the tests of such a platform. hi
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 30 2016 14: 43
    0
    Well, here is the first thing that comes to mind regarding functionality, is target designation and sniper.
    There, there are no such strict restrictions on the mass of weapons.
  12. t shurik
    t shurik April 30 2016 18: 02
    0
    NEREKHTA- FROM THE NAME OF THE RIVER NEAR THE CITY OF CARPETS
  13. Viktr458
    Viktr458 1 May 2016 05: 36
    +1
    Good help for mobile complexes. So in an ambush a full-fledged RGD does not survive a small column or in a positional area
  14. Olezhek
    Olezhek 3 May 2016 18: 20
    0
    In general, it is very interesting to understand the cost of such a "minitankette"
    The thing is that when establishing large-scale production, interesting prospects for combat use open up: this is like the massive use of tanks.