Military Review

The Pentagon said that in the case of Russian aircraft flying over their warships, "the answer may follow"

128
The U.S. military department issued a message containing a kind of warning for aircraft of foreign countries that will fly around the ships of the U.S. Navy. It is, of course, about Russian military aircraft. Recall that a few days ago, Su-24 aircraft flew over the destroyer Donald Cook, located about 70 nautical miles from the Baltic base fleet RF US officials said the maneuver of Russian aircraft was carried out in an "unsafe and unprofessional manner."


The Pentagon said that in the case of Russian aircraft flying over their warships, "the answer may follow"


After that, the head of the US State Department, John Kerry, said that the US military could continue to "respond to such actions." Now the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, Joseph Dunford, made a similar statement, speaking to the senators.
Informational portal Military.com reports that Dunford told the senators about the case of the destroyer Donald Cook, and about the interception of two American aircraft by Russian fighters. We are talking about the interception of the reconnaissance aircraft RC-135 over the Baltic Sea, as well as the interception of the Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft P-8, which tracked in the area of ​​the KF base station in Kamchatka.

Dunford stated that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Valery Gerasimov, “to discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) could “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request permission from the superior or other actions.
Photos used:
www.militarytimes.com
128 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. umka_
    umka_ April 29 2016 13: 00
    +36
    Very Americans want war, looking for a reason ...
    1. Vend
      Vend April 29 2016 13: 03
      +25
      The answer will be tough from the USA. With the ships of the US Navy, the mass dismissal of personnel will begin. laughing
      1. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 April 29 2016 13: 10
        +43
        Reference :

        INTIMIDATION
        One of the harsh methods of exposure is bullying. Fear and panic are the most powerful emotions; they deprive a person of the ability to think soberly and are used to control people. Intimidated people are easier to manage, and if a person is in a state of panic - do what you want with him.
        Intimidation - a technique of a totalitarian sect and a totalitarian state. Somehow it’s not democratic ... laughing
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock April 29 2016 13: 16
          +6
          and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) can "make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not required to request permission from the senior management for certain actions"

          Unfortunately, during the times of the USSR, we had a reverse situation, now I don’t know how I hope the ship commanders have the right to make such decisions without coordination with the higher management.
        2. Observer2014
          Observer2014 April 29 2016 13: 29
          +37
          The Pentagon said that in the case of Russian aircraft flying over their warships, "the answer may follow"
          What is it like? Will our planes fly around in response to ships? laughingSurprise us.
          They fly around our ships with their planes. We don’t throw a tantrum. But they’ll try to bring down the plane. We’ll drown the ship. Tell me the 3rd World War. Yes and no! Their gut is thin!
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 14: 53
            +29
            Quote: Observer2014
            But they’ll try to bring down the plane. We’ll drown the ship

            The fact of the matter is that our plane has already been shot down. Not Americans - Turks. And we did not answer them with weapons, only with sanctions. Maybe it’s even better against Turkey, but now the military of the whole world knows that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they won’t be anything for it.
            1. Lt. Air Force stock
              Lt. Air Force stock April 29 2016 15: 06
              +5
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              The fact of the matter is that our plane has already been shot down. Not Americans - Turks. And we did not answer them with weapons, only with sanctions. Maybe it’s even better against Turkey, but now the military of the whole world knows that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they won’t be anything for it.

              And the Turks shot down the Su-24 just 47 kilometers from the airfield in Latakia, if we had serious air defense systems at that moment, the Turks could be afraid to attack our plane, and if they were not afraid, then I’m sure the anti-aircraft missile would have overcome these 47 kilometers in a few seconds, shooting down the aggressor’s plane.
              The speed of the S-400 missiles is 9000 kilometers per hour, which is 9000/3600 = 2,5 kilometers per second, 47 / 2,5 = 18,8 seconds would require the F-16 to be shot down.
              1. igor67
                igor67 April 29 2016 16: 24
                -34%
                Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                The fact of the matter is that our plane has already been shot down. Not Americans - Turks. And we did not answer them with weapons, only with sanctions. Maybe it’s even better against Turkey, but now the military of the whole world knows that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they won’t be anything for it.

                And the Turks shot down the Su-24 just 47 kilometers from the airfield in Latakia, if we had serious air defense systems at that moment, the Turks could be afraid to attack our plane, and if they were not afraid, then I’m sure the anti-aircraft missile would have overcome these 47 kilometers in a few seconds, shooting down the aggressor’s plane.
                The speed of the S-400 missiles is 9000 kilometers per hour, which is 9000/3600 = 2,5 kilometers per second, 47 / 2,5 = 18,8 seconds would require the F-16 to be shot down.

                Two weeks ago there was an incident with an Israeli plane in the same area, Russian
                air defense launched a rocket, but did not hit.
                1. gluhar24
                  gluhar24 April 29 2016 16: 41
                  +12
                  For igor67: Can I have a reference to a miss on an Israeli plane?
                  1. igor67
                    igor67 April 29 2016 16: 58
                    -15%
                    Quote: gluhar24
                    For igor67: Can I have a reference to a miss on an Israeli plane?

                    http://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/04/22/smi-rossiyskie-vks-v-sirii-dvazhdy-obstrely
                    ali-izrailskie-voennye-samolety.html This is to your resource, we discussed this before Natanyahu’s trip to Moscow
                    1. RUSIVAN
                      RUSIVAN April 29 2016 23: 42
                      +2
                      What kind of "gosdepovskie" news, where that was, and where and what is not known, or go there I do not know where, take it, I don’t know what ... grief the journalists, and most importantly others pick up and carry on, HERD instincts ...
                2. Lt. Air Force stock
                  Lt. Air Force stock April 29 2016 16: 47
                  0
                  Quote: igor67
                  Two weeks ago there was an incident with an Israeli plane in the same area, Russian
                  air defense launched a rocket, but did not hit.

                  Nothing is known about that incident, and as far as I remember there wasn’t talking about the S-400, but about an air-to-air missile.
                  1. igor67
                    igor67 April 29 2016 17: 00
                    0
                    Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
                    Quote: igor67
                    Two weeks ago there was an incident with an Israeli plane in the same area, Russian
                    air defense launched a rocket, but did not hit.

                    Nothing is known about that incident, and as far as I remember there wasn’t talking about the S-400, but about an air-to-air missile.

                    I didn’t write about the c400, the first incident was using a rocket from a ground-based air defense system, the second aircraft fired
                  2. igor67
                    igor67 April 29 2016 17: 03
                    -7
                    Here is my last comment, you can continue to minus me, but the fact remains, the planes returned to the base whole
                    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 18: 08
                      +16
                      Quote: igor67
                      but the fact remains, the planes returned to the base whole

                      That is yes. Why don’t they come back? Did someone shoot at him? According to a source in Israel, without a place, without dates, without confirmation by the military ... Sorry, but this is some kind of nonsense.
                3. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                  Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 20: 54
                  0
                  answered below
                4. Red_Hamer
                  Red_Hamer April 30 2016 03: 43
                  0
                  To make it clear with a view to the future that (ay yay yay, you have nothing to fly here) does not mean to miss. That's all that actually happened. And that is a fact.
              2. Stas157
                Stas157 April 29 2016 16: 39
                -1
                Quote: Lt. Air Force stock

                The Turks shot down the Su-24 just 47 kilometers from the airport in Latakia, if we had serious air defense systems at that moment, the Turks might be afraid to attack our plane

                Air defense at that time was sufficient to cover the Su-24, FORT in Moscow and the Su-30 and Su-34 aircraft. And why did not cover it is another question. Nevertheless, one could immediately respond to the aggression of the Turks by hitting the Inzherlik aerodrome, take-off, and the KP (administrative building) pointwise with Caliber.
                1. Homo
                  Homo April 29 2016 18: 48
                  +2
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Air defense at that time was sufficient to cover the Su-24, FORT in Moscow and the Su-30 and Su-34 aircraft. And why did not cover it is another question.

                  There are no questions - we are not at war with Turkey and were not even in conflict.
                  Quote: Stas157
                  Nevertheless, one could immediately respond to the aggression of the Turks by hitting the Inzherlik aerodrome, take-off, and the KP (administrative building) pointwise with Caliber.

                  Nonsense and insanity! You are a provocateur! soldier
                  1. Stas157
                    Stas157 April 29 2016 19: 16
                    +2
                    Quote: Homo
                    There are no questions - we are not at war with Turkey and were not even in conflict.

                    So you shouldn't defend yourself? Did we come to Syria for the war or for an easy walk? Moreover, there were opportunities for cover! That is how life teaches fools. How childish it sounds: "We did not expect!", "Stab in the back!", "We are not in conflict!" ... Aha!
                    Quote: Homo
                    Nonsense and insanity! You are a provocateur!

                    Not understood? What are you about? I can answer you with the same coin. You are a coward and a traitor! Because of people like you, now everyone may think that shooting down a Russian plane can be done with impunity.
                  2. DenZ
                    DenZ April 30 2016 13: 38
                    0
                    Nonsense and insanity!

                    Call to account for the downed plane Nonsense ??? Formally, they could do everything as Stas157 wrote. Also, the American AWACS gunner was shot from the sky. However, they did not do anything. Why they didn’t do it is a completely different question.
              3. region58
                region58 April 29 2016 18: 23
                +3
                Quote: Lt. air force reserve
                9000 kilometers per hour, this is 9000/3600 = 2,5 kilometers per second, 47 / 2,5 = 18,8 seconds would be required

                This ... Karas would have to be reduced ... It is of course 48N6E3 / 48N6-2 / 48N6DM to 2500 m / s declared, only at what altitude and for what purposes? Acceleration time yet ... And with hypersound, our Americans and so far only scare each other. Although judging by the fact that the Americans regularly begin to lay bricks, something our developers do.
            2. Observer2014
              Observer2014 April 29 2016 15: 28
              +5
              "Andrey from Chelyabinsk" "The fact of the matter is that our plane has already been shot down. Not the Americans - the Turks. And we did not respond to them with weapons, only sanctions. Maybe against Turkey it is even better, but now the military all over the world know that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they will not get anything. "
              The widespread opinion. By the way. You ask yourself why the air defense means were not immediately delivered there to that Middle Eastern "gadyushnik"? And why "Eskander" also why not from the first days there? The conclusion suggests itself that to put them there needed a reason .And for no reason, something somehow did not stick right away. Now, by the hands of the Turks, we now have a mini triad under a fine and noble reason. Shock complexes. Those who are able to "knock off horns" for anyone in the region. Sounds blasphemous. But who said that politics , and especially geopolitics is a noble cause. hi
              1. vabvab
                vabvab April 29 2016 16: 02
                +4
                I would not say that "sanctions" against Turkey are "nothing".
              2. Homo
                Homo April 29 2016 18: 51
                -3
                Quote: Observer2014
                but now the military all over the world know that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they will get nothing. "

                Yes, you are a strategy genius! In response to the killing of one pilot, we will answer the war with the unknown (maybe 10 or maybe 1000000) the number of dead! Brains must be used for their intended purpose!
                1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                  Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 19: 13
                  +6
                  Quote: Homo
                  Yes, you are a strategy genius!

                  not. I am an ordinary sane person.
                  Quote: Homo
                  In response to the killing of one pilot, we will answer the war with the unknown (maybe 10 or maybe 1000000) the number of dead!

                  That's a lot, right? Let our pilot be killed, it’s better than a war game and 10 thousand killed. Let the second one be killed - this is better than a war game and 10 thousand killed. Let a company be killed, a battalion ... It's still less than 10 or 100, or maybe even a million killed! fool
                  So I have a question - how many soldiers can be killed so that you don’t feel sorry for responding with war? The brigade? A division? Or maybe the whole army? And what? They receive money for this and know that they can be killed ...
                  More stupid than you wrote, and impossible to come up with. For the killing of a soldier there must be a proportionate and adequate POWER response. Blood for blood, otherwise in this world your feet will be blotted out. But to declare war on US, in response to this answer, let Turkey decide.
                  Quote: Homo
                  Brains must be used for their intended purpose!

                  So use. The cowshed and shovel are looking forward to seeing you.
                  1. Homo
                    Homo April 29 2016 23: 14
                    -3
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    That's a lot, right? Let our pilot be killed, it’s better than a war game and 10 thousand killed. Let the second one be killed - this is better than a war game and 10 thousand killed. Let a company be killed, a battalion ... It's still less than 10 or 100, or maybe even a million killed!

                    fool fool fool fool It suits you better. There are no times 100 times in such things! Turks have enough for one long! Lost at times more than guessed.
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    So I have a question - how many soldiers can be killed so that you don’t feel sorry for responding with war? The brigade?

                    And how much do you need to ditch to prove the steepness of the state? Or dream of a third world! Here we show the whole world! am
                    "For the murder of a serviceman, there must be a proportional and adequate FORCE response. Blood for blood, otherwise in this world they will wipe your feet about you."
                    It seems you are not a sane person but a gopnik! Blood for blood is unacceptable for international relations, it spills into rivers and seas of blood !!!
                    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 00: 15
                      +3
                      Quote: Homo
                      And how much do you need to ditch to prove the steepness of the state? Or dream of a third world! Here we show the whole world

                      Just answer my question :))) How many deaths of Russian people do you consider sufficient to declare war?
                      You are just an ignorant ignoramus. If you WOULD LITTLE study history a little, then you would know that:
                      "We are asked to choose between war and dishonor. We have chosen dishonor, and we will get war!"
                      If we, having shown strength, stopped Turkey, then NO ONE WASHINGTON P ... star and thought would have arisen to blackmail us by force. And now, our inadequate you, the world REALLY, was on the verge of the third world. Because by showing our weakness, we ourselves opened the way for the devil: if an inadequate like Clinton comes to power in the United States, she will easily give the command to destroy our aircraft in the situation in which Cook finds itself. Because he will sincerely believe that we will not answer.
                      1. Homo
                        Homo April 30 2016 07: 17
                        -2
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        Just answer my question :))) How many deaths of Russian people do you consider sufficient to declare war?

                        First you will poke your finger in the ass. To strangers, perhaps a lot older than you, you need to contact you! Secondly, if one was killed, this does not mean that they will kill one person every week. And "otvetka" is 100% loss many times greater than the cause of the conflict!
                      2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                        Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 10: 15
                        0
                        Quote: Homo
                        First you poke a finger in the ass. To strangers, perhaps much older than you, you need to contact you!

                        Calling "you" is respectful. What respect is there for you? And do not hide behind for years, by themselves they do not add intelligence.
                        And as for poking in the ass ... you have no idea how right you are laughing Now I poke it ...
                        Quote: Homo
                        Secondly, if one was killed, this does not mean that they will kill every week a person.

                        You answer my question. So how many do you think you can kill the Russians so that you consider it sufficient to declare war, or at least for a forceful response without declaring war?
                        Quote: Homo
                        And "otvetka" is 100% loss many times greater than the cause of the conflict!

                        I’ll tell you a story. There was a case in Badaber, where Pakistanis secretly kept Soviet prisoners of war from Afghanistan. So a group of our guys managed to grab a weapon, but they didn’t manage to leave, and the soldiers accepted their last battle, but they brought along a bunch of mujahideen ... The Pakistanis were unable to hide the fact of the battle, and the detention of prisoners of war in Pakistan also surfaced.
                        Ours officially declared that Islamabad was to blame for what happened. And unofficially ... at first there was a terrible explosion at one of the largest Pakistani military bases. From 1000 to 1300 warriors of Allah went to the guria, the investigation indicated diversion. A little later, the presidential plane, along with President Zia-ul-Haq and a bunch of senior officials on board, crashed. No one survived. So the President of Pakistan PERSONALLY paid for the death of our soldiers.
                        And you know what? The third world war did not happen.
                      3. Homo
                        Homo April 30 2016 14: 14
                        -1
                        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                        Calling "you" is respectful. What respect is there for you? And do not hide behind for years, by themselves they do not add intelligence.


                        So, according to the rules of modern etiquette, the appeal "You" is mandatory in the following cases: 1. Regardless of age and social origin - in an official environment and when referring to unfamiliar or unfamiliar. At the same time, an appeal to “You” to a person who has reached 25 years of age is supplemented by name and patronymic; to those who are from 15 to 25 - most often only the full form of the name. 2. When communicating with a person met for the first time. 3. In communication between colleagues, in the presence of unauthorized persons. 4. During business communication in the absence of informal relations between people. 5. To colleagues during a conference, symposium, etc., regardless of the forms of communication with them in an informal setting. 6. When communicating with the patient, regardless of the circumstances. 7. Journalists during interviews even with well-known people. 8. When referring to students of high and high school, which emphasizes a respectful attitude and notes the maturity of the individual. 9. In relation to older people - along with the name and patronymic. 10. In a formal setting, even in relation to a well-known person.

                        Author: Ekaterina Kirsanova
                        Source: http://shkolazhizni.ru/culture/articles/30874/
                        © Shkolazhizni.ru
                      4. Homo
                        Homo April 30 2016 14: 14
                        0
                        The appeal "you" is permissible: 1. In the family, which is evidence of close relationships. Although today, in some places, the tradition of referring to parents to “You” is preserved. 2. In an informal setting when contacting a good friend, colleague, friend, children. 3. At school, when referring to a child under 9 years old.

                        Author: Ekaterina Kirsanova
                        Source: http://shkolazhizni.ru/culture/articles/30874/
                        © Shkolazhizni.ru
                      5. Homo
                        Homo April 30 2016 14: 15
                        -2
                        There are no strict rules governing the transition from “you” to “you”, but the practice of communication has developed certain guidelines. So: You can’t make a unilateral decision to switch to “you,” especially with regard to a dependent person (for example, a subordinate), as this can be perceived as familiarity. The elder may offer the younger to switch to “you,” but this does not in any way oblige the younger to agree to such a transition, despite the age difference. The transition to "you" with a person with whom there is a big difference in age and social status is unacceptable. In the relationship between a man and a woman, the proposal to switch to “you” should come exclusively from the woman. This rule is not so strictly enforced in business relationships. Be that as it may, everyone makes a choice for himself, is guided in communication independently, especially since life situations are diverse, and the rules of etiquette do not give answers to all questions. And at the same time, it should be remembered that etiquette as an element of external culture helps to solve many problems in everyday situations, often even stop them before they arise.

                        Author: Ekaterina Kirsanova
                        Source: http://shkolazhizni.ru/culture/articles/30874/
                        © Shkolazhizni.ru
                      6. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                        Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 15: 21
                        +2
                        Well, you must :)))) Now re-read carefully what you have accumulated. Perhaps you will finally guess that my address to you on "you" is emphatically disrespectful. And, perhaps, you will realize that this is exactly my attitude towards you, which I am not going to hide.
                        You can, of course, portray a person of fine mental organization and raise your eyes to grief with the words "O times, about manners!" But you will look extremely unconvincing, for one simple reason.
                        Remind you how this dialogue started?
                        Quote: Homo
                        Yes, you are a strategy genius! In response to the killing of one pilot, we will answer the war with the unknown (maybe 10 or maybe 1000000) the number of dead! Brains must be used for their intended purpose!

                        What do you think the cited by you Ekaterina Kirsanova would say about addressing a person unknown to you with a "rationalization" to use the brains for their intended purpose? This is how it is combined with the rules of etiquette, you, "an adherent of foundations"?
                        And now, if you’ve finished with this, I’m asking you for the eleventh time: how many Russians should be killed so that you consider this the basis for declaring war, or at least for a forceful response without declaring war?
                        "Do not go into yourself, mechanic, they will find you there in no time" (the phrase is attributed to one admiral of the Northern Fleet)
                      7. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                        Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 20: 39
                        +1
                        One more escaped to the blacklist :))) Well, I'll be bored. And with joy.
              3. Homo
                Homo April 30 2016 07: 20
                -1
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                If we, having shown strength, stopped Turkey, then NO ONE WASHINGTON P ... star and thought would have arisen to blackmail us by force.

                How naive you are, I have been blackmailing us without interruption since 1945!
              4. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 10: 21
                +1
                Quote: Homo
                How naive you are, I have been blackmailing us without interruption since 1945!

                Do not distort. I wrote about blackmail by force, like what is being done now - a threat to bring down our planes in response to actions that do not contradict international law. And this was not - even with Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
        3. RUSIVAN
          RUSIVAN April 29 2016 23: 50
          0
          You are not sane, you are a man who is susceptible to emotions and offers such actions under emotions, and not from sound judgment ... You rolled up your sleeves, clenched your fists, clenched your teeth with a desire to teach them a lesson, YES I have the same desire as with many But ...EVERYTHING HAS ITS TIME
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 30 2016 00: 21
            +2
            Quote: RUSIVAN
            EVERYTHING HAS ITS TIME

            We have already missed our time. And now, for the first time in 100500 years, the Americans are threatening us with the destruction of our aircraft. And, most sadly, they are absolutely right - if the GDP did not dare to fulfill its duty as the head of state in relation to some lousy Turkey, then where should he go on the rampage against the US Air Force.
      2. Observer2014
        Observer2014 April 29 2016 19: 34
        +1
        ["Homo"
        Quote: Observer2014
        but now the military all over the world know that it is possible to shoot down a Russian plane, and personally they will get nothing. "


        My dear, this is in honor of what you added to me, here is what I did not print on when !! Ah! am What is it called?
      3. Homo
        Homo April 30 2016 07: 15
        -2
        I'm bastard on the number of people who want to die! Or do they hope to sit out in the rear? I will disappoint you, in the third world it will be impossible to sit out. Will go to everyone!
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 18: 59
      +1
      Quote: Observer2014
      You ask yourself why the air defense means were not immediately delivered to that Middle East "gadyushnik"?

      By thoughtlessness. And out of readiness to apply.
      Quote: Observer2014
      The conclusion suggests itself that to put them there, an occasion was needed.

      Yeah. For a bunch of airplanes, an excuse is not needed, but for an air defense system - well, it’s simply necessary.
      Quote: Observer2014
      Now, with the hands of the Turks, we now have a mini triad of percussion complexes under a fine and noble pretext.

      Late to drink Borjomi when the kidneys fell off.
      Quote: Observer2014
      It sounds blasphemous. But who said that politics, and especially geopolitics, is a noble cause

      The question is not in nobility, but in gain. Those. that in politics and in geopolitics no one cares whether you are noble or not. It’s only interesting if you won or lost. So in the situation with Turkey, we lost.
      No one in the US has ever threatened to shoot down our pilots. It was NOT-WE-SLI-MO! During the period of the most extreme weakness of the Russian Federation, NATO did not dare to attack the paratroopers in Pristina, although they had more than enough strength for this - but they were afraid of the third world war. And now, for the first time, God knows how many years our combat planes have threatened us! And this is the result of weakness in Turkey
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 April 29 2016 20: 20
        +2
        "Andrey from Chelyabinsk" hi
        Well, I don’t think that it’s not out of thought. What, and our general staff, is not worth reproaching out of thought in the last ten years.
        For air defense, there is also such a range as from 400. We do not know, or rather we can say: We can only guess about these or those nuances of the geopolitical situation. At that time. I would definitely like to ask a question (no, not you dear "Andrey from Chelyabinsk "). So why didn't they introduce c400 right away? Yes, and "Iskander" too. After all, you don't even need to be an officer of the General Staff to understand the need to protect our group. I will repeat in that "gadyushnik". Maybe we will find out this answer when a certain time passes? I was typing in early October and was wondering why not in Syria, our ground strike complexes.
        Observer2014 RU October 3, 2015 12:27 | Obama: Russia has acquired enemies in the face of Syrian Sunnis
        Now wait a moment. As soon as a turning point in the war appears, the Americans with the mongrel will rush there with a ground group. That would then be hit with a heel in the chest when deciding the post-war device. So in all wars, read the story. Therefore, you need to make this scum right away that God is not let them appear there.
        And in general, it only seems to me that Syria lacks ground-based weapons? "ESKANDER" for example 25 pieces so just in case. Let the creatures on all their neighbors experience.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 29 2016 20: 53
          +2
          Quote: Observer2014
          Well, I don’t think that it’s not out of thought. What, and our general staff, is not worth reproaching out of thought in the last ten years.

          But I am not reproaching the General Staff. The General Staff acts in strict accordance with the POLITICAL directive of the president. Those. the task of politicians is to indicate a potential enemy, and the task of the general staff is to make sure that the enemy in case of which receives by wort.
          In Syria, the political leadership of our country (specifically, Russian President Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich) did not foresee the possibility of military intervention by Turkey. Although it could - generally speaking, our VKS operation in Syria was taped on Erdogan's diseased corns. Accordingly, Putin did not orient the General Staff about the possible intervention of Turkey, respectively, the General Staff did not take appropriate measures.
          Quote: Observer2014
          I would definitely like to ask a question (no, not you dear "Andrey from Chelyabinsk")

          I apologize if I put it somewhere too abruptly. Don't get me wrong - my harshness was never addressed to you personally drinks , I just really feel sorry for our soldiers.
  2. user
    user 1 May 2016 11: 25
    0
    And we did not answer them with weapons, only with sanctions.


    I then wrote a fragment of a conversation between two Turkish businessmen.

    And it's all because of some sort of plane


    So it’s unlikely that they will be able to make import-confusion according to our sanctions. For them it is tougher than if we shot down that F-16, but with the Americans the story is just the opposite.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Inok10
    Inok10 April 29 2016 13: 15
    +5
    Quote: Wend
    The answer will be tough from the USA. With the ships of the US Navy, the mass dismissal of personnel will begin. laughing

    ... in vain they started talking in such a tone ... it is possible to get real by the slope ... though the horror is reminiscent of childhood and childishness ... you kick someone not very much, but he will run back ten meters and threaten from a safe distance. .. laughing ... and the Baltic and Black are full of echoes of war, it’s not an hour ... and there will be another memorial such as the battleship Arizona ... wink
    1. nrex
      nrex April 29 2016 16: 23
      +2
      The Polish submarine is already being dragged home in tow, it is being completed)))
  • Leviton
    Leviton April 29 2016 13: 16
    +4
    Dunford stated that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Valery Gerasimov, “to discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) could “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request permission from the superior or other actions. laughing

    that is, it can be washed off independently and without permission?
  • the most important
    the most important April 29 2016 13: 47
    +14
    Quote: Wend
    The answer will be tough from the USA.

    When the Iranians put the Marines on the floor with their faces, there was no cry ... And with them the only way! Then they will forget where the road to the Black and Baltic Sea is.
    1. Vend
      Vend April 29 2016 14: 40
      0
      Quote: the most important
      Quote: Wend
      The answer will be tough from the USA.

      When the Iranians put the Marines on the floor with their faces, there was no cry ... And with them the only way! Then they will forget where the road to the Black and Baltic Sea is.

      Do not pull the phrase out of context. The thought is distorted.
  • Stalker.1977
    Stalker.1977 April 29 2016 13: 18
    +4
    It is interesting to hear that ours will answer ... And how.
  • Peasant
    Peasant April 29 2016 13: 40
    +1
    They want to measure pipettes? Oh well.
  • Bobxnumx
    Bobxnumx April 29 2016 16: 29
    +2
    And nobody canceled the electronic warfare, Cook already felt them somehow. good
  • PSih2097
    PSih2097 April 29 2016 20: 38
    0
    Quote: umka_
    Very Americans want war, looking for a reason ...

    I propose the answer - with our nuclear submarines and no, when flying around with an Orion or Poseidon, they come up and end with the help of MANPADS, and then blame them for provocation that ours thought of a dropped torpedo, and not a buoy ...
  • Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer April 30 2016 03: 29
    0
    Yes, they have become insolent, from their impunity. For a long time the USA, no one indicated the place, but here they showed it (and quite modestly). Now they have a break in the "template", their own greatness and exclusivity.
  • x.andvlad
    x.andvlad April 29 2016 13: 01
    +9
    Oh, how it touched the "hegemons"! What if we consider their response as an attack? We don't attack. You can advise the commander of an American ship to think very carefully if there is a brain.
  • Monos
    Monos April 29 2016 13: 02
    +10
    They are, they can.
    1. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock April 29 2016 13: 19
      +1
      Quote: Monos
      They are, they can.

      What if they take them with their pants down?
      1. Monos
        Monos April 29 2016 20: 17
        +4
        laughing So they are always taken with their pants down. They have such a country.
  • JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb April 29 2016 13: 03
    +10
    Apparently Cook's 3rd rendezvous will be his last .....
    1. DMoroz
      DMoroz April 29 2016 13: 47
      +3
      and it will be, as usual, April 12, the tradition can not be violated? Yes, they will stay away from our shores that day.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • selbrat
    selbrat April 29 2016 13: 05
    0
    "I am not obliged to request permission from the management for certain actions ..." That is, they may not ask the management whether to guess or not. And what brand of diapers to use in this case ... laughing
  • Teberii
    Teberii April 29 2016 13: 07
    +26
    At one time, the commander of the British detachment, in Yugoslavia at the famous airfield. Having faced our guys and having received an order from NATO generals. To clear the entire territory, he then replied “That he will not be the organizer of the third world war.” I hope sanity will win.
    1. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad April 29 2016 13: 51
      +11
      It was a British general Mike Jackson.
  • Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 29 2016 13: 08
    +3
    So we will find out the price of your "Faberge"!
  • demchuk.ig
    demchuk.ig April 29 2016 13: 08
    +5
    Yes, it is very unpleasant when a “world power” is not very respected by a “regional power”! But they have little guts! It has been tested more than once!
    1. krops777
      krops777 April 29 2016 13: 28
      +3
      And the brains are even smaller, the mind is enough to shoot.
  • GELEZNII_KAPUT
    GELEZNII_KAPUT April 29 2016 13: 09
    +3
    I wonder if Cook will bring down our plane, will they drown him or what?
    1. Scoun
      Scoun April 29 2016 13: 31
      +5
      Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
      I wonder if Cook will bring down our plane, will they drown him or what?

      If neutral, then there will be notes, protests, consultations requiring evidence that the plane was a threat ....
      more or less like this. This applies to everyone, if our cruiser "Moskva" in neutral waters considers that the plane threatens safety, he has the right to shoot it down .. and then notes protests and proceedings, at one time the Americans shot down an Iranian passenger liner. Since then, nothing has changed.

      The US government said the Iranian plane was mistakenly identified as an Iranian Air Force F-14 fighter.



      So, US President Ronald Reagan called the incident “the right defensive action,” and only at the end of the trial in the International Court of Justice did the US authorities agree to pay compensation to the families of the victims!

      http://hiswar.net/pages-of-history/160-kak-poveli-sebya-ssha-kogda-sbili-passazh
      irskij-boing-irana-v-1988-godu
    2. Rus2012
      Rus2012 April 29 2016 13: 53
      +3
      Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
      I wonder if Cook will bring down our plane, will they drown him or what?

      100% will be STOPPED, they will offer to surrender, disarm and tow to our port ... otherwise they will send to the bottom!

      There are examples -
      American sailors crying on their knees annoy John Kerry
      http://mpsh.ru/6902-plachuschie-na-kolenyah-amerikanskie-moryaki-razdrazhayut-dz
      hona-kerri.html
      See photo below
    3. Berg berg
      Berg berg April 29 2016 16: 12
      +1
      100% drown! The plane will have time to convey that it is illegally attacked in neutral waters by a hostile ship, I ask for help! And help will come either from a submarine or from the Bastion!
    4. Yuyuka
      Yuyuka April 30 2016 00: 22
      0
      I wonder if Cook will bring down our plane, will they drown him or what?

      or whatever ... when shooting, they may accidentally detonate cutlets in the kitchen near the cook on Cook request
  • Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 April 29 2016 13: 09
    +11
    Dunford said that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Valery Gerasimov to “discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) can “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not required to request permission from the senior management on those or other actions "
    .
    Dunford is disingenuous. There are certain international rules for such cases. Yes, sometimes our flight crew, we note that often in response to the actions of the "partners", acts on the verge of these rules ... but precisely on the verge. This is where the professionalism of our pilots lies. I would like to note that when "intercepting" our strategic bombers of the Tu-160 and Tu-95MS type, Western partners act in a similar way.
    Previously, they acted even more impudently. So, as the saying goes: "In someone else's ... he sees a straw ... in his log does not notice."
  • svp67
    svp67 April 29 2016 13: 09
    +5
    Dunford stated that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Valery Gerasimov, “to discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) could “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request permission from the superior or other actions.
    Everything is more alarming and disturbing ...
    And the background for these words, more and more exercises of NATO troops near our borders. It looks like "Anaconda" not only squeezes the "hug" more strongly, but is also ready to bite.
    So what you want - you don't want, but "Si vis pacem, para bellum"
  • karakuin
    karakuin April 29 2016 13: 11
    +4
    For the fourth time, I propose to hang helicopters with Khibiny over Kukami in the order of guarding at a distance of 3 km a day for three. Let them hang out in manual mode to the nearest waters of the NATO allies without the possibility of shooting from a pukalnik.
    1. Aleksandr1959
      Aleksandr1959 April 29 2016 13: 34
      +1
      The Khibiny electronic warfare system is not installed on helicopters.
      For information http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-802.html
      The "Lever" is used
      If the Lever-AV system is mounted on a Mi-8 helicopter, the latter goes through the process of retrofitting and some modernization. So, containers for equipment are mounted in the cargo compartment, on-board wiring is equipped so that electricity is supplied to the system with the necessary voltage indicators, etc. Phased antennas are mounted on the sides, which are necessary for directing the radiation of the Lever

      http://fb.ru/article/225458/ryichag-av-noveyshie-sistemyi-radioelektronnoy-borby
      i
  • Flinky
    Flinky April 29 2016 13: 13
    +4
    Your point is not iron, gentlemen mattresses.
    Therefore, in orderly rows go fuck.
  • LÄRZ
    LÄRZ April 29 2016 13: 14
    +8
    "... don't go, children, to go to Africa ..." Don't poke your nose towards us and everything will be tip-top. We do not come to you, but you arrive / arrive to US. Who invited you? "As it comes around, it will respond." No need to climb to us, we ask politely, obscenities.
  • Valter1364
    Valter1364 April 29 2016 13: 14
    0
    The article is a blown soap bubble.
    Information - zero!
    If there is nothing more to write about, it is better not to write at all.
  • Russia
    Russia April 29 2016 13: 14
    +6
    Sorry, guys, you are swimming - wherever and as you want.
    We fly - where we want and how we want!
    In my opinion - full parity.
    But know the border!
    1. Sorokin
      Sorokin April 29 2016 14: 01
      +1
      Well floats then you yourself know what. And why do we violate the ecology?
  • shans2
    shans2 April 29 2016 13: 15
    +2
    We’ll sink the ship, all business.
  • ilyinval61
    ilyinval61 April 29 2016 13: 16
    +7
    During the Cold War, US aircraft and their satellites flew dangerous overflights of our warships. And ours, too, in response. It's just that now for 25 years they have forgotten it and consider themselves "untouchable". A new caste - I can do whatever I want, but don't touch me !!! Insolent from impunity !!!
  • Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 29 2016 13: 16
    +2
    The response of the Pentagon will immediately follow the response of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
    Let's see who will be worse ...
  • Igor V
    Igor V April 29 2016 13: 17
    +4
    You gentlemen, either threaten or not to do FIGs at our borders. And it turns out - a threat with tears in his eyes.
    1. DMoroz
      DMoroz April 29 2016 13: 55
      +4
      So after all - you don’t happily fart with sad @ opoy (F. Ranevskaya said this)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru April 29 2016 13: 17
    +5
    Quote: x.andvlad
    Oh, how it touched the "hegemons"! What if we consider their response as an attack? We don't attack. You can advise the commander of an American ship to think very carefully if there is a brain.

    The commander of an American ship, air or surface, by definition, cannot THINK !!! They strictly follow the instructions, and a step to the right or left of the actions defined by these instructions puts the Amerkos in a stupor !!!
    So, except for fighting, they can’t do anything. But then, safe and professional!
  • Lester7777
    Lester7777 April 29 2016 13: 18
    +2
    ... "a response may follow"
    Can. But the bullet point in this "dialogue" will be put by the DBK "Bastion".
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 April 29 2016 17: 01
      +2
      ... the bullet point in this "dialogue" will be put by the BRK "Bastion".
      There were no bastions in Kaliningrad.
  • drilled
    drilled April 29 2016 13: 19
    +7
    This one read at all what is considered an imitation of an attack, and what can be answered? Pass OVER the ship and approach CROSS the course.
    And about the "unprofessional manner" Dad talked about. How over the Atlantic F-4 stood in front of the Tu-95 engines and gave afterburner. UPRT jumped to zero.
  • epsilon571
    epsilon571 April 29 2016 13: 21
    +7
    This statement of the US State Department says that we need to take preventive actions in the future, because all their statements on this score are not a disguised bluff, and only the one with the stronger nerves wins in "poker". Russia must show its potential near the American borders, and on the Black Sea, and in the Baltic - wherever possible. All this will be a good lesson against the enemy's impunity, it was too painful for them to disband.
  • Yuyuka
    Yuyuka April 29 2016 13: 24
    +8
    they are not familiar with the Russian mentality ...

    - uncle, let me light ...
    - go away, boy!
    - Why are you offending the little ones ??
    - ........

    from the unpublished "Collection of advice to potential aggressors of Russia"

    Russians are insidious - if you see them an unarmed plane and have something to say or do, do not look back, there is "accidentally" there is another, not completely unarmed, and perhaps at this moment the Russians are reading a prayer for the repose of your souls repeat
  • NordUral
    NordUral April 29 2016 13: 25
    +2
    It's about intercepting an RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft over the Baltic Sea, as well as the interception of a P-8 Poseidon patrol anti-submarine aircraft, which made tracking in the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet base in Kamchatka.
    What I marked in red is how to understand? We needed to shoot down this god, if everything corresponded to what was written, if it was not possible to plant.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null April 29 2016 19: 05
      0
      Quote: NordUral
      It's about intercepting an RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft over the Baltic Sea, as well as the interception of a P-8 Poseidon patrol anti-submarine aircraft, which made tracking in the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet base in Kamchatka.
      What I marked in red is how to understand? We needed to shoot down this god, if everything corresponded to what was written, if it was not possible to plant.

    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null April 29 2016 19: 08
      0
      For lodges who did not know the rules:
      http://www.airforce.ru/history/kal007/
      - read, stick, then write something tortured .. experts (censorship) negative
  • Million
    Million April 29 2016 13: 26
    +4
    Russia is not a country that will be afraid of an answer. In the event of a local conflict in the US Army, mass dismissals of the military will begin. Everyone wants to live, but Russia is not a banana republic, we can fight!
  • Michael
    Michael April 29 2016 13: 29
    +4
    Quote: NordUral
    It's about intercepting an RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft over the Baltic Sea, as well as the interception of a P-8 Poseidon patrol anti-submarine aircraft, which made tracking in the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet base in Kamchatka.
    What I marked in red is how to understand? We needed to shoot down this god, if everything corresponded to what was written, if it was not possible to plant.

    It's like "we can do anything, but you can't do anything."
  • Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 29 2016 13: 40
    +4
    The Americans can take this step, Erdogan decided, although he already regretted it. It will not be possible to lower it, it will be necessary to answer, otherwise the legs will then be wiped. The second time you cannot leave unanswered, even if it is the United States. Answer tough.
  • Human Factor
    Human Factor April 29 2016 13: 41
    +1
    Diarrhea can follow and only.
  • lopvlad
    lopvlad April 29 2016 13: 42
    +3
    may “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request the permission of the higher management for certain actions”.

    so take or piss ?. Russia is on its shores and therefore do not hope that we will allow them to freely manage our shores. The enemy has come under our walls and we have nowhere to retreat.

    PS In my opinion, the Americans do not want a real hot war, but they want to intimidate us without any military clashes.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 29 2016 13: 42
    +3
    The whole story can happen to Cookies, one of the Aborigines was eaten, the second we drown the Lord did not bring. Something in this name is wrong, or with those who wore and still bear these names. It’s strange.
  • Exumer
    Exumer April 29 2016 13: 50
    +2
    How to take and how to drop their four-wheeled paratroopers laughing
  • Obolensky
    Obolensky April 29 2016 13: 51
    +3
    The Pentagon has a lot to say. Personally, I doubt that in spite of all the attempts of the "hawks", there will be an open confrontation. Most likely these are just next steps in order to intimidate someone, show someone, and prove to someone that they can do everything. We'll see. So far, these are just words.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets April 29 2016 15: 02
      +3
      Quote: Obolensky
      The Pentagon has a lot to say. Personally, I doubt that in spite of all the attempts of the "hawks", there will be an open confrontation.

      When the Indo-Pakistani conflict occurred in November-December 1971, the Indians asked Grechko to help block the NATO ships and, first of all, the aircraft carrier "Enterprise". Our sailors then acted insolently and the NATO troops panicked. The British immediately disappeared, and the Americans fell under the distribution. All other details Read the rest of the details at Shirokorad * The fleet that destroyed Khrushchev *. Unfortunately, I cannot give a link to the memories of Admiral V.S. Kruglikov about this operation, but the Americans panicked terribly. The link to V.S. Kruglikov is not working.
      1. TT-33
        TT-33 April 29 2016 23: 23
        0
        The result of this confrontation, according to American analyst Stephen Kish, was that “after the end of the Indo-Pakistani war, the US prestige in India was seriously affected, while the prestige of the USSR greatly increased ... This was largely the result of the Soviet Union's use of its military naval forces as a "catalytic containment" ... "

        Original link here http://alerozin.narod.ru/indi.htm
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Arkan
    Arkan April 29 2016 13: 54
    +2
    Dunford stated that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Valery Gerasimov, “to discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) could “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request permission from the superior or other actions.


    To put it simply, having a directive from his command to open fire to kill in the event of seeming unfriendly actions from third countries, the American captain and the entire crew of the ship become extreme when a conflict arises. 70 miles for "Caliber", "Bastion" and other "gifts" is a point-blank shot.
  • Wolka
    Wolka April 29 2016 13: 54
    +3
    Yeah, well, the Yankee hedgehog scared straight with a bare ass ...
  • Human Factor
    Human Factor April 29 2016 13: 55
    0
    BUSINESS NAMES.

    Belarusian pioneers, in order to reduce the shame, when "Donald Cook" appeared in world ports, decided to hold a competition for a new name of the ship. Three names came out in the final - "Donald Pook", "Donald! KU! (Fast)," Donald, ku- ku) ".
  • Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 29 2016 14: 00
    +6
    Quote: umka_
    Very Americans want war, looking for a reason ...

    Saving your presence hi WHAT A 3rd WORLD WAR !! What are you talking about! The third world is suicide! First of all for the United States! It is necessary to be a stupid donkey to go to war with Russia now. Just think that England, for example, no longer had two "BULLOV" all over, and then with a margin! so that post-apocalyptic documentaries could be shot in the USA. 22 goals in total. One submarine Yuri Dolgoruky carries 16 missiles, each with 6 warheads. One salvo and 75% of US GDP none. 75% of US factories In 22 cities
    In the USA there are only 15 junction substations that supply electricity to the entire USA. And one factory of high voltage transformers for such substations. 16 high-precision missiles (preferably with low-power nuclear warheads) and the United States will be left without electricity and the possibility of restoring energy supply for at least 1,5 years.
    Just think about what can only one "Barey" And our ground strategic troops! And the Russian Aerospace Forces!
    1. Amurets
      Amurets April 29 2016 14: 24
      +1
      Quote: Observer2014
      In the USA there are only 15 junction substations that supply electricity to the entire USA. And one factory of high voltage transformers for such substations. 16 high-precision missiles (preferably with low-power nuclear warheads) and the United States will be left without electricity and the possibility of restoring energy supply for at least 1,5 years.

      What are you suggesting? There will be a massive madness in the USA. Remember the accidents of 1977 and 2003. Unfortunately I did not find reports in Russian. But I remember there were articles in TM and Science and life. The articles are not politicized, but the analysis of what consequences the Power System accident can lead to.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 April 29 2016 16: 59
        +2
        "Amurets". I am not suggesting, I am simply stating that the least thing will happen to the United States if suddenly some deer from the top of the United States wants to fight with Russia. And how few missiles the United States needs to return to the Stone Age. I am already silent about exotic targets. Strikes against volcanoes and tectonic faults off the coast of the United States.
      2. twviewer
        twviewer April 29 2016 16: 59
        0
        As far as I remember, the Israelis incapacitated Iranian nuclear facilities without missiles, through a virus that affects the operation of Siemens controllers, so missiles have long been not the only argument. New times require new approaches, and whether we have progress in this area is a big question. Both in terms of defense and attack.
  • Olegater
    Olegater April 29 2016 14: 06
    +4
    Is it too much for these bankrupt ones to allow themselves (a louse grunts noticeably in a year or two given their external and internal problems, which they do not want to notice and solve). Rather, it is the agony of a rat cornered. Unfortunately, this animal louse is infected with Russophobia and aggression. Permissiveness for the collapse, and in fact the occupation of other countries, has a very bad effect on the behavior of their politicians and military personnel. Now I’ve read an article that staff members are considering incidents like that in the Baltic leading to military clashes between lice and Russia - there’s no just words to comment on (mat, mat, mat .................. ) Too many such incidents on land in the air and at sea occur near our borders, dear forum users do not find?
  • dchegrinec
    dchegrinec April 29 2016 14: 16
    +3
    The United States and the West must understand for themselves: we have no untouchables and never will be. If someone decides to play the role of the gendarme with us, he will quickly regret it.
  • demiurg
    demiurg April 29 2016 14: 25
    +2
    You can put our intelligence ship in vain near Norfolk, fifty kilometers away, and watch their reaction.
  • shinobi
    shinobi April 29 2016 14: 32
    0
    Kaaaak terrible toooo! It turned out that their hysteria only made worse, now cheeks are inflated. Obos .. they were silent in a rag.
  • inferno_nv
    inferno_nv April 29 2016 14: 47
    +5
    I think that it is necessary to say the same to the whole world: All ships (sea, air) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation can destroy any target (plane, ship, drones, etc.) if the commander considers that he is in danger! And hammer on all their cries, etc.! In general, such a desire arose: to send these hijackers from the UN rostrum to three cheerful letters and let everyone see that a bolt can be put on America, including their opinion! hi
    1. demandy1
      demandy1 April 29 2016 17: 35
      0
      Well said, it’s direct in Russian as it doesn’t matter what the flag is in two stripes
  • kirpich
    kirpich April 29 2016 15: 02
    +4
    Oh, my heart feels that if our "bosom friends" do not calm down, then somewhere we will grapple with them seriously. I really would not like it.
  • dr. sem
    dr. sem April 29 2016 15: 56
    +2
    "The Pentagon said that in the case of Russian aircraft flying over their warships, "the answer may follow"
  • nick_826
    nick_826 April 29 2016 16: 09
    0
    And Ours should be told that in the case of "OBPLYVA" by foreign ships of our borders, something will also follow!
  • nrex
    nrex April 29 2016 16: 29
    0
    After such attacks by American politicians, it seems to me that the number of sailors who want to go on a hike to the Russian shores will decrease. Unless they include coke, whiskey and diapers))) or lure the military by fraud.
  • Pitot
    Pitot April 29 2016 16: 31
    +1
    And what? You can unleash the 3rd world. Delete the yellowstone according to theirs and we’ll see who will ask someone for a potato to eat. When you need to put an end to it. I will die - others will survive and mark this Meraconos hydra.
  • Verdun
    Verdun April 29 2016 16: 46
    0
    Dunford stated that he agreed with the head of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Valery Gerasimov, “to discuss such incidents,” and then added that the commander of an American ship (air or sea) could “make any decisions in the event of such an incident and is not obliged to request permission from the superior or other actions.
    The Yankees have lost something of their professionalism since the Cold War. And the nerves began to play pranks. Previously, their fighters regularly flew up to our "strategists" on alert to say hello. The pilots knew each other both by sight and by name. And no one wagged a finger, spattered saliva. And when the nerves are naughty, they need to be treated. Go to a psychiatrist, take a course of a sedative ...
  • Stariknv
    Stariknv April 29 2016 17: 19
    +1
    American warships near the Russian borders have nothing to do and their ultimatum is not appropriate. If a Russian aircraft is shot down, in order to prevent this, two planes must be sent, one without ammunition, the second is fully equipped so that you can immediately respond.