Military Review

Global Democratic Awakening. Brzezinski will save the planet

182
Political analyst Zbigniew Brzezinski reappeared in the world media. This time, an elderly husband, prone to thinking about politics, scared the planet with the probable loss by the United States of its status as a world power. The loss of this status will give rise to "global chaos." However, the world can save the "global restructuring."


Global Democratic Awakening. Brzezinski will save the planet


About the new ideas of Mr. Brzezinski, about his strategy to save the world told the multilingual site Katehon.com.

According to the American political analyst, “the end of America’s global role” will likely lead to “global chaos.” To avoid this, a supporter of American hegemony of the United States proposed a "global restructuring." About this pundit told in the journal "The American Interest".

The entire article by Brzezinski boils down to two theses:

1. The United States is no longer a global empire.

2. Probably, the planet is in chaos if the US imperial hegemony goes to history.

And it was here that Brzezinski proposed several recipes for the United States to preserve its power.

Recipe "A". America’s main geopolitical rivals (Russia and China) should “work towards the interests of the United States.” To implement such a strategy, one should “use the crisis in the Middle East”. Brzezinski thinks that Washington will only show its effectiveness in the fight against terrorism and violence in the Middle East, when it creates a coalition that will include Moscow and Beijing.

Separately, the political scientist spoke about the Middle Kingdom. In his opinion, the political perspective of China in the near future is clear: he “should become America’s main partner in containing global chaos,” beginning in the Middle East. If this strategy does not take place, then terrorism will spread, reach Russia, its south and east, and also penetrate to the west of China.

Recipe "B". Arrange it so that the Islamic world had acted in line with US interests.

Here Brzezinski refers to his doctrine of “global democratic awakening,” which at one time justified the participation of the United States in the Arab Spring. Its essence is simple: use anti-American forces to strengthen US domination through various mechanisms of influence and direct intervention. Particular attention should be focused on the new politically active masses of the non-Western world. The emergence of the IG, and before that the Muslim Brotherhood, and indeed the “color revolutions” in the Islamic world can be viewed as a practical application of this particular strategy. These forces are "surprisingly" create problems for all except the United States.

Recipe "B". Maintain the US military presence in the Middle East. By any means! The text of Brzezinski says that this is crucial for the United States, the withdrawal of forces will immediately lead to the collapse of "American hegemony."

The complete withdrawal of US troops from the Muslim world, which is referred to as “domestic isolationists,” notes Brzezinski, could lead to the instigation of new wars (possible examples: Israel against Iran, Saudi Arabia against Iran, Egypt’s intervention in Libya) and create an “even deeper crisis ". This crisis will undermine faith in America, which until now has played a “stabilizing role” on the planet.

From such a scenario in the most “unpredictable way” Russia and China will be able to become geopolitical beneficiaries.

The world order will collapse.

A frightened Europe, more precisely, the EU member states, will begin to choose “patrons” among the US, China and Russia, and compete with each other.

Brzezinski suggests the next strategy, where the situation in the Middle East will play a key role.

1. It is necessary to kindle wars in the region and sow chaos, relying on the forces of "global democratic awakening."

2. To declare war on terrorism, but to shift its burden to Russia and China by involving them in a hopeless regional conflict.

3. To maintain, or even increase, the military presence under the pretext of maintaining stability in the Middle East.

All this is necessary to mask the theses on the fight against terrorism, drawing attention to the suffering of Muslims and the inhabitants of the third world.

“The general threat of Islamic terrorism” is not a “threat” per se, especially for the United States. America has seriously suffered from Islamism only once in its history - September 11 2001. In the US, Muslims make up about 1% of all citizens, in contrast to the multi-million Muslim population of Russia and China. And unlike these two countries, there is not a single region in the United States where the threat of Islamist separatism may arise.

In addition, America is separated from the conflict region by the Atlantic Ocean. Thus, the United States can afford to play at two tables at once: secretly support extremists and fight terrorism, drawing Russia and China into it, and subsequently weakening the Islamic world.

There is one more hope for the future: Washington expects to use the Islamic extremists raised by it in Russia - most likely, this will happen in the post-Putin era. This threat of Islamism will be used to involve Russia in the US-oriented system. Brzezinski openly declares that such a pro-Western strategy is based on Russia's transition from a "Byzantine imperial expansionist ideology" to the "concept of a Russian national bourgeois European state that exists within the Western world."

In accordance with the classical geopolitical tradition, Brzezinski considers Russia, not China, to be the main American enemy.

He advises pursuing a policy that will make at least one of two potentially dangerous opponents a "partner" of the United States. Now it is possible to outwit Russia rather than China. But in the long run, China can become more dangerous.

* * *


The old political fox is ready to stir up the whole world chicken coop and is not afraid even of the owner’s appearance with a gun.

The strategist is extremely unconvincing. Judge for yourself.

If the US ceases to be a "hegemon", the world for some reason will cover "chaos."

If the United States defends its role as a global “stabilizer,” the following will happen on the planet: the fire of terrorism will break out in the Middle East, in which the people of Washington will splash gasoline, and for some reason Russia and China will dash it out. In the meantime, the United States will encourage Islamist Russian “separatists”, who in the end, already in the post-Putin years, will burn the flame of the “Arab spring” in Moscow. Behind Moscow, the Americans "outwit" and Beijing.

The implementation of such a nightmarish scenario, even its very beginning, will inevitably lead to a third world war. Obviously, such a war, in which the "hegemon" hovers overseas and benefits from blood, is the goal of a "global democratic awakening." In the total war and hegemony of the United States, the American ideologue sees order in the pursuit of a multipolar world - chaos.

Brzezinski shuns lies and double standards. All things he calls their names.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
182 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. amirbek
    amirbek 4 May 2016 06: 05
    +35
    According to the American political scientist, "the end of America’s global role" is likely to lead to "global chaos." To avoid this, a supporter of US hegemony of the United States proposed a "global restructuring."
    all that's left is to find Gorbachev
    1. noWAR
      noWAR 4 May 2016 06: 16
      +80
      All that remains is to strangle this old, unsafe croaking scum, so that the air becomes cleaner.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 4 May 2016 06: 31
        +56
        The strategist is extremely unconvincing. Judge for yourself.

        If the US ceases to be a "hegemon", the world for some reason will cover "chaos."
        certainly ... nations will begin to develop their own economy and industry, build a sovereign policy is a real CHAOS for the US economy.
        1. Very old
          Very old 4 May 2016 07: 30
          +14
          The fossil got out! This is it
          And XREN-TV is resting

          Either a therapist, or a medicine man ... For how many years he has been writing prescriptions, how many presidents taught, taught Absent from hands, do not obey the Guru
          1. cniza
            cniza 4 May 2016 08: 21
            +14
            It was not for nothing that this naphthalene political scientist was dragged "onto the stage", the USA is really up to something and this is a kind of testing.
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 4 May 2016 08: 51
              +14
              Quote: cniza
              It was not for nothing that this naphthalene political scientist was dragged "onto the stage", the USA is really up to something and this is a kind of testing.


              Usa is always up to something, it's in their blood

              And to the old senile - thank you for chewing to anyone it is not clear that no one had any illusions.

              Everyone hears Obama - "global role", "rules of world trade", "global leader", and Brzezinski deciphers these slogans






              1. Reserve officer
                Reserve officer 4 May 2016 12: 55
                +3
                Well, with world restructuring clearly got excited. But with regard to perestroika in the States, the idea is interesting. Only under one condition - with the participation of Gorbachev.
                1. Exumer
                  Exumer 5 May 2016 09: 39
                  0
                  Yeah let go labeled sins begs
              2. Gogia
                Gogia 4 May 2016 13: 32
                +8
                Unlike our ventures, American ventures are planned in the horizon of 25-50 years ... We are still with children in these ventures ... See and analyze for yourself how they created a united Europe, they themselves will embarrass it through the Arab springs, etc. d. and now scaring Russia they tied it tightly to itself. Also in the Asian region - only a scarecrow is another China ....
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. mitrich
                  mitrich 6 May 2016 10: 09
                  +1
                  The correct conclusion is that Americans are building and implementing plans, most successfully for decades. The same cold war, an example. And it is necessary to listen to this scavenger in all seriousness, voices the general line of the hegemon for a long time. And we need to prepare for this and work out a long-term strategy. What would reptiles be broken off, their very hegemony in the teeth.
              3. Ivan_ich
                Ivan_ich 4 May 2016 20: 26
                +1
                Recipe "A". America’s main geopolitical rivals (Russia and China) should “work towards the interests of the United States.” To implement such a strategy, one should “use the crisis in the Middle East”. Brzezinski thinks that Washington will only show its effectiveness in the fight against terrorism and violence in the Middle East, when it creates a coalition that will include Moscow and Beijing.

                Mm-yes, the grandfather Bzde falls into insanity ... It's time for the old man on a well-deserved rest in a nursing home.
            2. APASUS
              APASUS 4 May 2016 19: 06
              +1
              Quote: cniza
              It was not for nothing that this naphthalene political scientist was dragged "onto the stage", the USA is really up to something and this is a kind of testing.

              Briefly:
              The USA is number one in the world and will do everything so that there is a war in the world with the participation of Russia and China, hoping that it will not affect them.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Vadim237
            Vadim237 4 May 2016 09: 40
            +1
            Nobody is listening to this anymore - because there are only problems from his advice.
          4. Orionvit
            Orionvit 5 May 2016 16: 29
            +1
            The main ideologist of all perestroika. As soon as the earth wears such.
        2. evil partisan
          evil partisan 4 May 2016 08: 50
          0
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          real CHAOS for the US economy.

          -ripens in Rezh. yes
          Hi, economist of the Rezhevsky spill! drinks
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 4 May 2016 16: 54
            0
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            Hi, economist of the Rezhevsky spill!

            Hello, Gazprom's "defect gas analyzer"! hi
        3. SPACE
          SPACE 4 May 2016 10: 18
          +12
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          nations will begin to develop their own economy and industry, build a sovereign policy is a real CHAOS for the US economy.

          This is a USA nightmare. All of their current economic problems and debt, i.e. The decline of America’s hegemony lies precisely in the fact that their commodity-producing component and market share in the world’s economy created by them are constantly falling, passing to China, Europe and other countries including Russia. And most importantly, from a geographical point of view, the United States is located at a very great distance from the main consumers and resources, it is not profitable, the raw materials must be brought there, something must be produced and exported, and in technology they are far from monopolists, all this sooner or later will lead them to natural isolation. Within the framework of the existing levers in the form of a monopoly of economic law, lobbying for one’s interests, the dollar, is no longer able to turn this mountain stream of upcoming events into sleep. And they have one way out, to go beyond the framework of international law, using other non-civilizational leverage, create contradictions and chaos in Eurasia, divide and scare countries with fire like a whip, etch using and generating media and international law, religious, territorial, etc. contradictions to destroy their own economies with the help of others, forcing someone forcibly as Europe, frightening them with loneliness, periodically luring someone with a gingerbread. As a predator living in lonely and inaccessible rocks, each time descending into the pasture to raise another deer, for them all states are just objects of their vital interests, a chicken coop, the owner will feed someone today, and someone tomorrow for the broth.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 4 May 2016 12: 55
            +5
            SPACE

            I don’t think that you made the right conclusion why trouble will continue in the world.

            Firstly, the word democracy has long been cynical. In the USA, another system really works. Interest lobbying system. Interests are represented by economic groups, commonly called corporations. Corporations themselves do not issue laws and, whenever possible, avoid laws. They work under the guise of a state, but the state very conditionally controls them.
            Since the independence of corporations is very high, their international economic projects overlap and create chaos. It should be borne in mind that the area of ​​their interests is most likely controlled by these bearded "rebels" who are paid for by some uncontrolled economic groups. Very conveniently, no one answers anything.

            Well, something like this.
            1. SPACE
              SPACE 4 May 2016 18: 59
              +2
              Quote: gladcu2

              Well, something like this.

              Of course, their elites and not only consist of many different groups pursuing their own goals, whose interests may temporarily, accidentally or not, coincide. But the fact that they impose sanctions on friendly terms, etc., suggests that someone unites them.
              1. gladcu2
                gladcu2 4 May 2016 19: 24
                0
                SPACE

                Where their interests coincide, then their state unites them. Well, and yet, open confrontation within the state has not yet been accepted.
                1. SPACE
                  SPACE 4 May 2016 20: 33
                  0
                  Quote: gladcu2
                  Where their interests coincide, then their state unites them

                  Neither the state makes them, but they are the state, the State Department is only an authorized official, guarantor and spokesman for their interests.
                  Quote: gladcu2
                  open confrontation within the state has not yet been accepted.

                  And while there will be no fundamentally large disagreements, as well as outside the states, they row in the same boat, until it sinks and there is a plan to unite even more.
          2. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 4 May 2016 17: 11
            +1
            Quote: SPACE
            As a predator living in lonely and inaccessible rocks, each time descending into the pasture to pick up another deer, for them all states are just objects of their vital interests, a chicken coop, the owner will feed someone today, and someone tomorrow for the broth.

            Demyan, you are definitely not written off from Prokhanov? belay
            1. SPACE
              SPACE 4 May 2016 18: 47
              +1
              We assume that it was a kind of subtle flattery. I have not read it, and plagiarism is too easy. hi
        4. kit_bellew
          kit_bellew 4 May 2016 13: 40
          +3
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          certainly ... nations will begin to develop their own economy and industry, build a sovereign policy is a real CHAOS for the US economy.

          Chaos in the US economy itself has long been. Ordinary American taxpayers, whose standard of living has been falling from year to year since 1991, is, of course, unable to serve an economy with a budget where expenditures on "defense" alone are approaching a billion. Hence their monstrous national debt. And they have no way out of this situation within the framework of the current model of the world economy, just like no one else.

          So far, the US Federal Reserve (I recall a structure independent of the US government), the actual branches of which are the Central Bank of many countries, including Russia, will continue to print unsecured money, everything will be bad. With the exception of the owners of the Fed, of course.

          All US official policies, voiced by both officials and Brzezinski, are aimed at preserving the dollar payment system, otherwise gentlemen bankers will be left with a pile of cut paper and nothing more... "And with kerenk? Kerenk? After all, you stoked the stove with kerenk ... ©"
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 4 May 2016 16: 58
            +1
            Quote: kit_bellew

            So far, the US Federal Reserve (I recall a structure independent of the US government), whose actual branches are the Central Bank of many countries, including Russia, will continue to print unsecured money, it will be bad for everyone. With the exception of the owners of the Fed, of course.

            voicing common truths does not lead to solving problems because ... (there is no point in writing ...)
      2. sa-zz
        sa-zz 4 May 2016 06: 37
        +19
        Everything will never die like a dog.
      3. inkass_98
        inkass_98 4 May 2016 06: 52
        +33
        "The old man is a typical bastard" (C).
        I completely agree with the previous speaker, the old rat moved completely blindly. To set the whole world on fire for the sake of the prosperity of the States is so wonderful, so American way. Being a ruler among the ruins is a wonderful prospect, but how long will the euphoria last? The states will not survive without external markets, and in the event of a hypothetical victory of radical Islam in the rest of the world, it is America that will remain the primary and most desired goal of the barmaley. As you know, "a well-seasoned genie will not build castles, and the adversary will have a hard time" (C).
        1. saniajan
          saniajan 4 May 2016 07: 01
          +8
          It seems to me that in this case Hitler "nervously smokes on the sidelines"
          1. Altona
            Altona 4 May 2016 08: 27
            +7
            Quote: sanyadzhan
            It seems to me that in this case Hitler "nervously smokes on the sidelines"

            ----------------------
            If we use modern American terminology, then Adolf Aloizovich was just "a regional aggressor, acting in the name of establishing democracy in Central, Eastern and parts of Western and Northern Europe, and some lands in Africa."
        2. Amurets
          Amurets 4 May 2016 07: 49
          +8
          Quote: inkass_98
          I completely agree with the previous speaker, the old rat moved completely from the back. To set fire to the whole world for the sake of the prosperity of the United States is so beautiful, so American

          Brzezinski, although he lived during the times of Khrushchev and Kenedy, did not make a fortune, or lost the remnants. Immediately after the "Caribbean Crisis", the American military realized that they did not have an "Ocean Barrier". This is well described by V.G. Lebedko. all the oceans of the planet. "But eventually they forgot it. But they then discovered and raised less than half of the boats, and project 629 missile carriers were not found and were raised and raised to the surface.
        3. Altona
          Altona 4 May 2016 08: 24
          +2
          Quote: inkass_98
          To set fire to the whole world for the sake of the prosperity of the States is so beautiful, so American.

          ----------------------
          As in the well-known phrase: "I am D'Artagnan in a white cloak, and you are all in feces."
        4. Grandfather Eugene
          Grandfather Eugene 4 May 2016 16: 43
          0
          Quote: inkass_98
          "The old man is a typical bastard" (C).
          I completely agree with the previous speaker, the old rat moved completely from the back. To set fire to the whole world for the sake of the prosperity of the States is so beautiful, so American. Being the ruler among the ruins is a wonderful prospect, but how long will the euphoria last? States without foreign markets will not survive.


          ---------
          If you look like this?

          Quote: gladcu2
          SPACE



          Interests are represented by economic groups, commonly called corporations. Corporations themselves do not issue laws and, whenever possible, avoid laws. They work under the guise of a state, but the state very conditionally controls them.
          Since the independence of corporations is very high, their international economic projects intersect and create chaos.


          -------


          Sometime in the future, the world will still be one. In the meantime, "Democracy is dead, Long live the Corporocracy"!

          Not for nothing. Gazprom is the property of Russia ... and almost Vietnam)
      4. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 4 May 2016 07: 14
        +2
        A recipe, aka B, and at the same time B..And didn’t you go, old bastard to hell, preferably forever ..
      5. Tatar 174
        Tatar 174 4 May 2016 07: 30
        +4
        Quote: noWAR
        All that remains is to strangle this old, unsafe croaking scum, so that the air becomes cleaner.

        Yes, let him croak, he will die sometime, especially since nothing depends on him directly. But the fact that even he admitted once he spoke about it, that the United States ceased to be a hegemonic, is worth a lot.
      6. sgazeev
        sgazeev 4 May 2016 08: 02
        +9
        Quote: noWAR
        All that remains is to strangle this old, unsafe croaking scum, so that the air becomes cleaner.
        1. Gogia
          Gogia 4 May 2016 13: 35
          +5
          He would have to dig out the eyes .... The unfinished little polish ... He was always used in the USA as a govnopolivka - so many things came out of his mouth ...
      7. Knizhnik
        Knizhnik 4 May 2016 08: 56
        +3
        He's not alone. A lot of them. Brzezinski is a name, and we "rinse" him, and how many of them are consultants, analysts, political scientists, advisers ... Neocons have crawled everywhere.
      8. Dam
        Dam 4 May 2016 08: 57
        +2
        Yes, he already put truancy in the cemetery. This bastard is not needed even hell.
      9. ARES623
        ARES623 4 May 2016 09: 28
        +3
        Quote: noWAR
        All that remains is to strangle this old, unsafe croaking scum, so that the air becomes cleaner.

        And with it, about 1 million more U.S. citizens (owners and majority shareholders of companies and corporations + politicians nurtured by them) who have specific business interests in the US military-industrial complex and lobby for destabilizing the world in order to increase arms costs.
      10. ava09
        ava09 4 May 2016 10: 19
        +6
        Here's what Bush Sr. said about this scum: (c) - Are you talking about Brzezinski? Village politician Jimmy in politics could not distinguish apples from cow cakes and therefore listened to idiots and clowns. I voluntarily resigned as Director of the CIA, so that my name would not have a relationship with this booth later. (C)
      11. GSH-18
        GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 01
        +3
        The loss of this status will create “global chaos”. However, the world can save ..

        Immediate forced dispatch to the Brzezinski madhouse! And let him bring his buddy McCain good Schaub was not bored to go bile.
      12. The comment was deleted.
      13. The comment was deleted.
      14. Gomel
        Gomel 4 May 2016 11: 21
        +1
        there is such a family
      15. Izotovp
        Izotovp 4 May 2016 12: 27
        +1
        He has children and at least one is already following his father's course.
        1. Gogia
          Gogia 4 May 2016 13: 37
          +1
          It’s bad that nobody will strangle these scum. Their whole family!
      16. BMP-2
        BMP-2 4 May 2016 13: 11
        +4
        1. It is necessary to kindle wars in the region and sow chaos, relying on the forces of "global democratic awakening."


        Well, in my opinion, this phrase alone is enough to put the reckless on an electric chair for terrorism and incitement.
        1. Gogia
          Gogia 4 May 2016 13: 37
          +2
          The Hague Tribunal is crying for him!
      17. Gogia
        Gogia 4 May 2016 13: 29
        +4
        The policy that this bastard is talking about has long been in action - was it not the United States that supported the Chechen Wahhabis and Afghan shaitans from al-Qaeda in the 80s and 90s, were they behind the Armenian nationalists who were the first to blow up residential buildings in Moscow, Didn't they create ISIS? Everywhere this scum was noted. I personally never wish anyone any harm, but I really want this dying man to suffer well, and in the next world they have prepared an individual spit for him !!! Fried sausage "Brzezinka" will be spinning Tyr-Tyr-Tyr.
      18. Alexandr-NVR
        Alexandr-NVR 4 May 2016 14: 48
        0
        It seems to me that the harm from this action would be more than good.
      19. vkfriendly
        vkfriendly 4 May 2016 14: 48
        +1
        ... also thought that no one in infancy had strangled this filth with a pillow
      20. go21zd45few
        go21zd45few 5 May 2016 05: 51
        +1
        noWAR; And why bother hands with this rotten meat, it will soon die like all US hegemony. Why such songs, but because they feel their demise.
      21. Werterex
        Werterex 5 May 2016 10: 21
        +2
        Absenteeism is put on the cemetery ... He caught up, goat ....
    2. oblako
      oblako 4 May 2016 07: 16
      +3
      Mr. Brzezinski recognizes no other order than the American order. He sees the world from precisely these positions. The whole question is that this position has lost its relevance, like a political scientist ... I wanted to leave when I slam the door, but I got a loud shyak on the floor of a crowded diaper ... Leaving the stage on time means for many - not cause pity. Does he have a small pension? Or to write, it’s just like writing - you must do it when you can’t ... The old man could not stand it ... sublimated ...
    3. Vend
      Vend 4 May 2016 09: 32
      +3
      Quote: Amirbek
      According to the American political scientist, "the end of America’s global role" is likely to lead to "global chaos." To avoid this, a supporter of US hegemony of the United States proposed a "global restructuring."
      all that's left is to find Gorbachev


      Now what, not chaos? It is the United States that suits this chaos laughing
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 4 May 2016 10: 18
      -6
      "If the US ends hegemony, the world will be in chaos."
      Interesting. And what would be better if China becomes the hegemon? laughing Society is so structured that you need to be equal to someone or listen to someone. Otherwise, everyone will scatter to the sides. To at least preserve some kind of order, rules common to all are needed. And so that they are carried out by everyone - coercive measures (legally - sanctions). According to the Yalta agreements, the anti-Hitler coalition became the "hegemon", and its organs were the UN and the Security Council. After the collapse of the USSR, the USA "overheated" everyone. The old man Brzezinski (according to some sources, a native of Kharkov) is not so wrong. If America leaves, NATO and the EU, the FRS and the WTO will collapse. The shaky world structure will collapse. The new redistribution of the World will begin with chaos. Liberals are the least fortunate. Something like this. hi
      1. Yars
        Yars 4 May 2016 23: 31
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        "If the US ends hegemony, the world will be in chaos."
        Interesting. And what would be better if China becomes the hegemon? laughing Society is so structured that you need to be equal to someone or listen to someone. Otherwise, everyone will scatter to the sides. To at least preserve some kind of order, rules common to all are needed. And so that they are carried out by everyone - coercive measures (legally - sanctions). According to the Yalta agreements, the anti-Hitler coalition became the "hegemon", and its organs were the UN and the Security Council. After the collapse of the USSR, the USA "overheated" everyone. The old man Brzezinski (according to some sources, a native of Kharkov) is not so wrong. If America leaves, NATO and the EU, the FRS and the WTO will collapse. The shaky world structure will collapse. The new redistribution of the World will begin with chaos. Liberals are the least fortunate. Something like this. hi

        Zbigniew Pole has nothing to do with Kharkov! And why should China become a hegemon ?!
    5. GSH-18
      GSH-18 4 May 2016 10: 55
      +2
      Global Democratic Awakening. Brzezinski will save the planet

      This old steppe has done so much evil in the world with his "ideas" blown into the ears of the amero-presidents and their entourage that he will burn in hell forever!
    6. Blondy
      Blondy 4 May 2016 12: 12
      0
      "Global Democratic Awakening." Brzezinski will save the planet.
      Then it will certainly be possible to say that the whole planet has reached insanity
  2. Evgesh91
    Evgesh91 4 May 2016 06: 11
    +5
    guys, don’t worry, this is old man’s insanity
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. CAMS
      CAMS 4 May 2016 06: 47
      +10
      No, this is the very essence of everything that is happening now. By any means to maintain hegemony without shying from the Nazis, Islamists, scoundrels, dictators and corrupt politicians. And who will say that none of this works? Do you know why? Yes, because that we play by the rules, and the Americans pretend that they play by the rules and the judges in this game are bought by amers. remember the hockey series of games is a great illustration of the Anglo-Saxon worldview. we can’t cope with the player - we’ll break his leg, we can’t bend the government of the country- change the ruler O. Henry perfectly described everything and unscrupulous politics and ruthless capitalism (Bolivar will not take two out). And Bzezhinsky is not shy, though he leaves an excusable loophole in the form of the first plan, but they act in the second place (Arrange so that the Islamic world acts in in line with US interests.) wait and see, our path (by the rules) is long
    3. smart Fox
      smart Fox 4 May 2016 08: 27
      +2
      Insanity is insanity, and the world does not miss its "chess". How old is he, is he immortal?
      1. Forest
        Forest 4 May 2016 09: 47
        +2
        88 to this hell. He and Gorbachev, along the way, decided by all means to live up to 3 of the world.
    4. Altona
      Altona 4 May 2016 08: 31
      +1
      Quote: Evgesh91
      guys, don’t worry, this is old man’s insanity

      -----------------------------
      He is trying to finish his "textbook on geopolitical chess". Offers a lot of unusable openings, although the United States has long been zugzwang. Each new geopolitical move worsens the situation in US foreign policy.
      1. 34 region
        34 region 4 May 2016 10: 42
        +3
        Altona! 08.31. What steps worsen the situation of the USA? Was the US hit hard by the Yugoslav bombing? From the entry of troops into Afghanistan? Drug production has grown (cultivation however!), Bin Laden has appeared. We went into Iraq and launched a paw in Libya, ISIS appeared. The price of oil has fallen. Storming Ukraine. And where is the deterioration of the US ???
    5. GSH-18
      GSH-18 4 May 2016 11: 39
      +1
      Quote: Evgesh91
      guys, don’t worry, this is old man’s insanity

      He has insanity long in life.
  3. Taygerus
    Taygerus 4 May 2016 06: 12
    +6
    he was waiting in hell am
  4. Sorokin
    Sorokin 4 May 2016 06: 14
    +12
    This American Pole is high time to destroy. I hate him for all his Russophobia with all the fibers of his soul. he is the last of which he just did not do anything to harm us. But at the same time, he was supposedly warming up in the United States. I hate this broadcast nits. And I would argue about standards. That still forgive me.
  5. Motherland Russia
    Motherland Russia 4 May 2016 06: 17
    0
    Senile senility in action.
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 4 May 2016 06: 18
    +1
    Brzezinski shuns lies and double standards. All things he calls their names...Unlike the rest of American politicians..Directly says, burn the world and that's it ..
  7. RussianRoulette
    RussianRoulette 4 May 2016 06: 25
    +8
    Grandfather found a grenade in the field, with this grenade he went to school, pulled a check, threw it out the window, grandfather is old, he doesn’t care!
    The old senile Brzezinski dreams of loudly slamming the door of his mac and remaining "Doctor Evil" until the end .... than in the end, with his own ideas, he predicts an inglorious end to the American continent .. it is a pity that, probably, in the end, the whole world, because :
  8. 1536
    1536 4 May 2016 06: 30
    +3
    But can not all of the above be transferred to the United States? When will everyone get tired of dying and fighting? Make a sweep there, as in a nest of terrorists! Zbiga, equate to the leaders of the bandits, of course.
  9. aleksfill
    aleksfill 4 May 2016 06: 31
    +3
    "... The complete withdrawal of US troops from the Muslim world, which the 'domestic isolationists' talk about," Brzezinski notes, may lead to the kindling of new wars .... "
    Wow, it turns out the entry of American troops and the bombing of Iraq, Libya are carried out in order to
    preserving peace. But the goat’s logic and sequence of actions, this goat long-liver
    hand-written, the claims of world domination of the peddler of US democracy already have someone to limit.
  10. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 4 May 2016 06: 33
    +5
    It becomes interesting! The grave digger of the USSR realized that he had gone wrong! One of those who loaded the USA so that they overstrained! Now he is looking for those who would have pushed the United States liver back.
    1. sgazeev
      sgazeev 4 May 2016 08: 18
      +2
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      It becomes interesting! The grave digger of the USSR realized that he had gone wrong! One of those who loaded the USA so that they overstrained! Now he is looking for those who would have pushed the United States liver back.
  11. Aleksander
    Aleksander 4 May 2016 06: 37
    0
    Crazy Brzezinski, crazy state ...
    1. I am human
      I am human 4 May 2016 15: 44
      0
      marasmatic hitleroid, a departure from the frantic American oligarchofascism
  12. Good cat
    Good cat 4 May 2016 06: 40
    +1
    And I thought chaos is the actions of the United States.
    1. saniajan
      saniajan 4 May 2016 07: 03
      +3
      Chaos = US democracy)))
  13. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 4 May 2016 06: 45
    +4
    Recipe "B". Maintain a US military presence in the Middle East. By any means!
    Well, nothing else was expected from the zbyshek. Mdya, the recipe is still the same, the culinary is simply no. And on the other hand, it is this type with his US advice that drowns in the cesspool. By the way, for Ukraine Svidomo should thank him.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 May 2016 06: 50
    +3
    1. The United States is no longer a global empire.
    2. The planet is likely to face chaos if US imperial hegemony goes down in history.

    Regarding the first point, I fully agree with this "political conqueror of Russia." On the second point, chaos will come if the United States continues its policy of the hegemon, but without the United States, peace and tranquility will come in world politics.
  15. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 4 May 2016 06: 53
    +4
    political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski reappeared.
    Mumiyo wakes up!
  16. AID.S
    AID.S 4 May 2016 06: 54
    +3
    "Brzezinski proposes the following strategy, where the situation in the Middle East will play a key role.

    1. It is necessary to kindle wars in the region and sow chaos, relying on the forces of "global democratic awakening."

    2. To declare war on terrorism, but to shift its burden to Russia and China by involving them in a hopeless regional conflict.

    3. To maintain, or even increase, the military presence under the pretext of maintaining stability in the Middle East.

    All this must be disguised with theses on the fight against terrorism, drawing attention to "the suffering of Muslims and the inhabitants of the third world."

    It feels like this is already happening.
  17. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 4 May 2016 06: 56
    +2
    The USA is the main source of chaos.
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 4 May 2016 07: 42
      +21
      Quote: RuslanNN
      The USA is the main source of chaos.
  18. delvin-fil
    delvin-fil 4 May 2016 06: 56
    +4
    The old man has not changed his repertoire for about fifty years! request
    1. saniajan
      saniajan 4 May 2016 07: 04
      +3
      It’s time to pass it to the clinic, for experiments
    2. Orang
      Orang 4 May 2016 08: 08
      +1
      Quote: delvin-fil
      The old man has not changed his repertoire for about fifty years!

      Why would he? They have a policy vector that does not change, Obama, banana, hrensgory, who is the president, it does not matter. Compare with Russia. Reactively shy.
  19. Yak28
    Yak28 4 May 2016 07: 02
    -7
    What is the loss of the status of a world power by the United States? Almost the whole world is sitting on the US currency, Europe is under US control, soon most developed countries will be in the US-led NATO military bloc. The Americans have never been so strong and had so much influence as now .
    1. saniajan
      saniajan 4 May 2016 07: 05
      +2
      maybe about the loss of mind, honor and conscience?
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 4 May 2016 07: 41
        +21
        Quote: sanyadzhan
        maybe about the loss of mind, honor and conscience?

        This they do not know
    2. fzr1000
      fzr1000 4 May 2016 07: 22
      0
      Crawl into the cemetery or wait?
    3. Knizhnik
      Knizhnik 4 May 2016 09: 14
      +1
      Until recently, the best times for the United States seemed to me to be the rule of Bill Clinton. But to be honest, Obama has done a great job, to be fair. Under him, the State Department practically "embraced the immense", turning the whole world against Russia. And he is not to blame for the fact that Russia has grown stronger, he could not do anything in principle with this inevitable process. As inevitably, the next presidents will not be able to prevent the formation of a multipolar world.
    4. Mercenary
      Mercenary 4 May 2016 09: 44
      +1
      They are firmly on the hook that worked against the USSR, you cannot keep "friends" forever. For free, these are not friends but freeloaders. As soon as the United States cannot pay for NATO, everyone will scatter together, like the Warsaw Pact! First of all, the current sixes once betrayed ...
  20. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 4 May 2016 07: 05
    +1
    Not only is senility evident, so is spring exacerbation what lol
    If only strong magnetic storms were not, otherwise the roof would completely blow wassat
    And the explanation is trivial - America simply does not know what to do ... adequate politicians of the Cold War times have sunk into Leta, frostbitten young people who have grown up and absorbed the chaos of the 90-00 division of the world. unable to even look a couple of steps into the future. So you have to get out of the table such rarities as Brzezinski. Like, he can breathe new breath into the ideas of America. After all, I really do not want to lose either my proclaimed "exclusivity" or leadership in the sandbox, when real guys realized that something was not clean here and started asking stupid questions and rolling up their sleeves. Simply put - "you are not the only one here and others must be reckoned with" ...
    hi
  21. samarin1969
    samarin1969 4 May 2016 07: 07
    +1
    "1. The region should be rekindled and wrecked by the forces of a 'global democratic awakening'.
    2. To declare war on terrorism, but to shift its burden to Russia and China by involving them in a hopeless regional conflict.
    3. To maintain, or even increase, the military presence under the pretext of maintaining stability in the Middle East.
    All this must be disguised with theses on the fight against terrorism, drawing attention to "the suffering of Muslims and ..."

    Well, it looks more like "post factum" than a political program of the future ... There is a lot of noise about the East. And the silence about the movement of NATO infrastructure in Eastern Europe ...
    Interestingly, and on some such "regional conflict" the army of the Celestial Empire could warm up?! ... Taiwan - read and strained ... wink
  22. Bagatyr
    Bagatyr 4 May 2016 07: 15
    +1
    In this case, Russia needs to strengthen special services and strengthen the alliance with China, etc.
  23. ImPerts
    ImPerts 4 May 2016 07: 17
    0
    The most undemocratic of the democratic countries offers itself as a panacea for chaos. This is natural, because in the USA there will not be any democratic transformations, they have long been seized for everything, paid for everything. Synthesizing plans, the United States will create chaos first, then lead to the power of the radicals (like the Saudis, Qatari), with whom they will negotiate. Then all this pack will be sent to the northeast and cream will be removed.
  24. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 4 May 2016 07: 18
    +7
    This old one hates Russia so much that it really, more and more physiologically becomes like a lizard. I quote his statements below, and these are not the most harsh statements about our homeland.

    “Russia is a conquered power. She lost the titanic struggle. And to say “it was not Russia, but the Soviet Union” means to flee from reality. It was Russia, called the Soviet Union. She challenged the USA. She was defeated. Now there is no need to fuel illusions about the great power of Russia. It’s necessary to discourage such a way of thinking ... Russia will be fragmented and under guardianship. ”

    “A new world order under US hegemony is created against Russia, at the expense of Russia and on the wreckage
    Russia. "
    Here it is (against Russia, at the expense of Russia) agree, just the motto of the Russian liberals.
    1. Knizhnik
      Knizhnik 4 May 2016 09: 21
      +2
      These courtiers come from Eastern Europe ... you don’t need to teach to hate, you want to teach whom you want
  25. fzr1000
    fzr1000 4 May 2016 07: 21
    +1
    It’s time to get used to the land, but it is all about global politics.
  26. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 May 2016 07: 32
    0
    This old bastard is trying to repeat the WWII scenario. It was the kindling of it that led the United States to world domination. Now - in anticipation of the global loss of hegemony by mattress - they are trying to blow off the dust "from the old cards." Then there was Hitler, in whom it was possible to invest capital, now - Daesh, around which the game is being built. The main thing is to ignite the fire away from its own borders.
  27. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 4 May 2016 07: 33
    +1
    A quarter of a century has passed, hello, hello, old man - the failed oracle ...
    1. Kenneth
      Kenneth 4 May 2016 08: 18
      +1
      There is an opinion that the ST never said this.
  28. dummy
    dummy 4 May 2016 07: 50
    -1
    Quote: Amirbek
    According to the American political scientist, "the end of America’s global role" is likely to lead to "global chaos." To avoid this, a supporter of US hegemony of the United States proposed a "global restructuring."
    all that's left is to find Gorbachev

    Why look for Medvedev if he is already there?
  29. xSprut
    xSprut 4 May 2016 07: 50
    +1
    Let old P. rdun write more often about his "great" dreams, with his senile marasmus he cannot hide anything, and openly merges all intentions and plans.
  30. Nitarius
    Nitarius 4 May 2016 07: 55
    +2
    Of course we will think about the USA .. but AFTER ALASOCHKA and so on!
  31. bandabas
    bandabas 4 May 2016 08: 06
    +1
    "If the US ceases to be a 'hegemon', the world will be in chaos for some reason." In my opinion, chaos has already covered the world.
  32. Kenneth
    Kenneth 4 May 2016 08: 19
    0
    Strong old man.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 4 May 2016 11: 42
      -1
      It is better to know the "old man" not by individual quotes from the media. BZ is not at all a Russophobe (who is surprised, give the opposite examples). An ardent anti-Soviet - yes! He fought not so much with the communist ideology as with the "Soviet regime", mainly in its attitude towards the countries of Eastern Europe. And he did it in some way. Maybe we will not pretend that many politicians of our time do not listen to the opinion of this old man. And, if Brzezinski himself predicts the decline of the United States as a world hegemon, then why inappropriate gloating about him on the forum? He cannot please everyone at once! Here you just need to know and think, know and think.
  33. Haloperidol
    Haloperidol 4 May 2016 08: 39
    +2
    Brzezinski - a rabid dog sick with Russophobia, which the gallows misses.
  34. sieras
    sieras 4 May 2016 08: 41
    +2
    In accordance with the classical geopolitical tradition, Brzezinski considers Russia, not China, to be the main American enemy.
    and after that, they still stink about some dangerous maneuvers around their plane and ship. in theory it would be even normal if they were shot down and sunk. an enemy after all.
  35. Knizhnik
    Knizhnik 4 May 2016 08: 43
    +4
    The USA has recovered the most terrible voodoo doll ... you see, in fact, things are bad.
    There is a crisis of ideas.
  36. Zomanus
    Zomanus 4 May 2016 09: 17
    +1
    Well, in general, nothing new.
    They started World War II to weaken the USSR and Germany.
    And now they are looking for with whom to bleed Russia, which would be feeding
    our adversary, weaken us and ruin us completely.
  37. lukke
    lukke 4 May 2016 09: 20
    +2
    Oh, the smoking room is alive!) Even the devil’s dad doesn’t take him to him)
    The recipes given are ridiculous, because Moscow proposed to fascington about the creation of a coalition, but we know that America is "exclusive" in our country and it is impossible for others to be equal members in it.
    Recipe B was already tested by the states in Afghanistan, when directly or through indirect organizations of "fighters for independence" (who were scattered and had no idea what they would do without war, since there would be no money) were directed against the main enemy of the USSR.
    Only here recipe 1 contradicts recipe 2 and individually both recipes showed their failure for one reason or another.

    Actually - I realized, due to geography, the states must be torn from the inside. But the pretext can be created in Europe, on BV, in Africa. Vietnam gave rise to a good wave, but then the USSR used it a little)
  38. warwer
    warwer 4 May 2016 09: 21
    -5
    The problem is that Russia cannot, in the current situation, offer something else, realistic. There are no partners, no money, no strong power and elite, no intelligible cunning strategy ... there is nothing but ambition and a desire to survive. Survival is a powerful incentive, but too much must be applied to it. Lotions will not help, only surgery. The surgeon is drunk, not to mention the anesthetist ...
    1. Bramb
      Bramb 4 May 2016 10: 33
      +3
      Actually offers something else. And not even in words, but already in practice is being introduced.
      No partners? )) Tell it to Europe, China, India, etc. - more than 2/3 of the world. Is there no strategy? Is that tricky - yes. There is a normal strategy: live in justice. It is categorically rejected by swindlers such as the United States.
      And what about ambition? Can you clarify? And then you are clearly not in the subject in the remaining paragraphs, maybe you know something here?
  39. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 4 May 2016 09: 32
    +1
    There was a time when the United States did not play the current role, and the world existed.
    Therefore, this is another scarecrow, designed to drive everyone into one herd.
  40. Mercenary
    Mercenary 4 May 2016 09: 37
    +1
    "The end of America's global role" is likely to lead to "global chaos"
    Mr. Brzezinski, if the United States ceases to exist tomorrow, it will only become easier to breathe, moneybags will not cry for a long time over green candy wrappers if they do not have time to convert to yuan or rubles!
  41. Volksib
    Volksib 4 May 2016 09: 39
    +1
    The mouthpiece of the US military-industrial complex is wheezing, but something is nasal. They have already stabilized to the fullest. For a long time, the "stabilized" states, or rather, the territories will be ...
  42. Baloo
    Baloo 4 May 2016 09: 40
    +1
    This old crocodile is the main enemy of mankind. Worn all his life with his ideas about the global hegemony of the FSA, one of the authors of the Harvard project. The first stage was a success, no more than the USSR. The second stage was disrupted by GDP and like-minded people. At the third stage, Brzezinski dreamed of cutting Russia like a sausage. It would be better if he died when he was little.
  43. ARES623
    ARES623 4 May 2016 09: 49
    +2
    Of course, this living mummy has long missed all the lines at the churchyard. But this subject only voices what is really being done by the American establishment in the silence of the cabinet. This parrot will die, another will appear on the stage, what's the difference? US policy does not change even with the replacement of presidents. I think the problem in this case is UNSOLVED, before the breakthrough of the Yellowstone abscess. We are doomed to solve the problems of living together with the United States on the same planet as they are generated. We radically disagree on all critical issues of peaceful coexistence. Anyway today. And changing faces is not a solution.
  44. antiexpert
    antiexpert 4 May 2016 09: 54
    +8
    “Are you talking about Brzezinski?”
    Jimmy, the village politician, could not distinguish an apple from a cow’s tortilla and therefore listened to idiots and clowns. This Polish Jew with his kagal, I am afraid, will be able to bring the country to a direct clash with Russia. Experience in organizing such matters is not for them to occupy - the two world wars organized by them do not allow taking their plans frivolously.
    (c) Bush Sr.
  45. Mercenary
    Mercenary 4 May 2016 10: 04
    +1
    Brzezinski, of course cattle, but this one primarily cares about their country.
    Take the example of the MEMBERS of the Medvedev government, if you all tried so hard for Russia, it would flourish!
  46. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 4 May 2016 10: 05
    +5
    Will not die, old mummy! This "Cassandra", only for ideas on the Middle
    The East should be judged by the World Tribunal as a hater and terrorist.
  47. hammer stalker
    hammer stalker 4 May 2016 10: 06
    +2
    How can I write this? This is a secret! And why don't you hear this from our diplomats? Who doesn’t say that it is possible to organize a riot in Texas in America? Why do these God's creatures go against nature? Why do we need a war? Just imagine, you can put water in Africa! Rid oceans of garbage, build roads, new engines, invent new clean technologies without the use of oil ?? Why should a person first think about daily bread? I am generally against the war !!! But to endure, I do not intend for the enemy to walk on my land !! And why can they talk and show about my homeland !! All that comes to their narrow-minded mind !! I think they need to be strangled, until a person understands, we live in the same house. Land!!
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 4 May 2016 11: 25
      +1
      So I wonder - why? Apparently, because we are afraid, or because de facto - we are a colony of America! And all foreign policy is a dirty farce for cattle.
      With a mattress only the language of ultimatums can be spoken.
      For example: "if at 72 o'clock you do not take out all foreign nationals from the territory of our outskirts, we will inflict a massive thermonuclear strike on the capital of the British."
      Do not have time - bang on landon with greetings - we warned! The next one for you, if you don’t change your mind! "
      I’m categorically against sharing my income with Americans and other creatures living outside the territory of the Russian Federation. But something our authorities think differently. And such a dirty trick as a gref, or miscarriages from the economic bloc of our clowning government in general openly support America!
  48. bravo-fab
    bravo-fab 4 May 2016 10: 12
    +1
    China will not knit anywhere else for another 10 years; it already has plenty to do in SEA-NEA and to the west of the borders. China is waiting, a half of the imaginary force due to no action.
    They do not want to repeat the mistakes of the USSR, get involved in local conflicts, and lose a consult inside the country.
  49. Prisoner
    Prisoner 4 May 2016 10: 17
    +4
    The magnificent funeral of Brzezinski and a similar rabble will save the planet.
  50. Londa
    Londa 4 May 2016 10: 34
    +2
    Insanity did not pass him ........