Military Review

An American patrol anti-submarine aircraft P-8 Poseidon was intercepted near the Pacific Fleet base point off the coast of Kamchatka

87
Perhaps, for the first time in recent times, representatives of the United States called the interception of a US reconnaissance aircraft by a Russian fighter a “safe and professional” one. We are talking about the interception of Russian patrol aircraft anti-submarine aircraft (assigned to the US Navy) P-31 "Poseidon" in the Kamchatka Peninsula by Russian MIG-8 fighters.


It is noted that the exact place of interception of the American anti-submarine aircraft was the area of ​​Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky - the basing point of the Pacific Fleet Vilyuchinsk. Even during the Cold War, the Americans gave this home base the name "wasp nest" because of the large number of submarines of the USSR.

Spokesman for the US Pacific Command Captain Second Rank (Commander) Dave Benham:
Interception was held in a safe and professional manner. The Russian fighter was approaching at a distance of at least 15 m.


It is reported by the news agency "Interfax".

An American patrol anti-submarine aircraft P-8 Poseidon was intercepted near the Pacific Fleet base point off the coast of Kamchatka


It must be added that the other two cases with actions of the Russian aviation regarding the American military equipment (reconnaissance aircraft over the Baltic Sea and the destroyer Donald Cook in the same Baltic Sea), noted in April, the American side called it “unprofessional and unsafe”.

For reference: "Boeing" P-8 "Poseidon" - anti-submarine patrol aircraft. Crew - 9 man. Empty weight - 62,7 t. Maximum take-off weight - 85,3 t. Maximum speed - 907 km / h (patrol speed - 330 km / h at an altitude of about 60 m). Combat radius - 3,7 thousand. Km. Practical ceiling - 12,5 km.
Photos used:
www.military-today.com
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vend
    Vend April 28 2016 16: 48
    +10
    Again, the mattresses are breaking off. Well don't let them quietly spy laughing
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall April 28 2016 16: 49
      +4
      Oh, do not like! sit on an aspen nest ...
      1. cniza
        cniza April 28 2016 16: 54
        +19
        And if it is closer to 15 meters, then this would not be professional.
        1. Tibidokh
          Tibidokh April 28 2016 16: 58
          +18
          In fact, the text indicates that the plane was approaching
          at a distance of at least 15 m.

          Oh, if there was Jane Psaki in the clip of the State Department, she would definitely clarify the situation. lol
        2. Yura
          Yura April 28 2016 17: 27
          +8
          Quote: cniza
          And if it is closer to 15 meters, then this would not be professional.

          We conclude from this that the farther the US pilots fly from our planes and territory, the more professional they are, from which we can conclude that the most professional US pilots fly over their territory. No, they are not cowards, just professionalism obliges.laughing
          1. alexmach
            alexmach April 28 2016 20: 38
            +3
            Yes, they don’t fly any further. Almost flew over the base point. For good, they would be worth intercepting for a couple of hundred kilometers.
        3. AleksPol
          AleksPol April 28 2016 19: 52
          +1
          Then how many meters was our plane approaching over the Baltic, if 15m is considered safe and there are no cries from the State Dep?
          1. Sagittarius YaNAO
            Sagittarius YaNAO April 28 2016 21: 06
            0
            They just got confused, "it's not their fault" .... laughing am
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. vlad66
        vlad66 April 28 2016 16: 54
        +12
        The interception took place in a safe and professional manner.

        Well you say repeat the mattress-beds do not yell about our non-professionalism. And what happened to the stripes? Usually the stench goes to the whole world. repeat
        1. Tibidokh
          Tibidokh April 28 2016 17: 36
          +2
          Quote: vlad66
          Usually the stench goes to the whole world.

          You just have a stuffy nose. hi
      4. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 28 2016 17: 00
        +3
        Mr. Kerry, why don’t you scream? again we did not work professionally? it was necessary to put it in a jet stream, let it be done in diapers ...
        1. Lelek
          Lelek April 28 2016 19: 11
          +4
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Mr. Kerry, why don’t you scream?


          Hello Yurich.
          When you spoke to him, Ser Carrey was drinking coffee and almost choked. Why are you doing this with the old "hippie". bully
      5. ARES623
        ARES623 April 28 2016 18: 52
        +2
        Quote: tiredwithall
        Oh, do not like! sit on an aspen nest ...

        Instead of an aspen nest, they would be planted on an aspen stake ...
      6. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 29 2016 02: 49
        +1
        Quote: tiredwithall
        Oh, do not like! sit on aspen nest ...
        belay what
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null April 29 2016 03: 42
          0
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          Quote: tiredwithall
          Oh, do not like! sit on aspen nest ...
          belay what

          No, well, everything is logical and understandable:

          - wasp, ordinary - it is .. small .. and its nest is wasp
          - aspen is a very big wasp.. and her nest, respectively - aspen ..

          It is clear that sitting on it is extremely unpleasant laughing
    2. Tibidokh
      Tibidokh April 28 2016 16: 50
      +1
      Quote: Wend
      don't let them quietly spy

      The State Department, after studying the diapers of the pilot and navigator of the Boeing R-8 Poseidon, changed its mind and announced another egregious case of the unprofessionalism of the Russian MiG-31 crew. wassat
      1. NDR-791
        NDR-791 April 28 2016 17: 06
        +1
        Interception was held in a safe and professional manner. The Russian fighter was approaching at a distance of at least 15 m.
        It is a pity that after that only panties are washed. If you hit! or FORCED TO LANDING! Well, I hope we will wait in our century of times when they will begin not only to think - to fly in, not to fly in, but simply DO NOT FLY !!!
        1. Tibidokh
          Tibidokh April 28 2016 17: 13
          +2
          Quote: NDR-791
          If knocked down

          We would then know how we had to answer Turkey for the downed Su-24. request
          Quote: NDR-791
          FORCED TO LANDING

          I think they did not invade our airspace.
          Quote: NDR-791
          It’s a pity that after that only panties are washed.

          What are you! This is evidence, evidence of Russian aggression. In no case can not be washed, let it fly. drinks
          1. NDR-791
            NDR-791 April 28 2016 17: 28
            +2
            You know, Powers didn't like it either, but they didn't think it necessary to ask him like the State Department. And as Turkey, oh-oh ... Of course not invaded. My question is "what if they invaded ???, what will happen now - how with Rust or how with Powers?" And this is the main question to which both the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are verbose and answer nothing. So I would like to know the position of the state, and not as two decades in a row.
            1. Tibidokh
              Tibidokh April 28 2016 17: 35
              +3
              Quote: NDR-791
              My question is "what if they invaded ???, what will happen now - how with Rust or how with Powers?"

              I don't think we will find out. Americans will not take such risks. But in general, there is a certain algorithm of actions in case of violation of airspace. First a warning, then coercion, then a "physical" warning, then an attack.
              Quote: NDR-791
              So I want the position of the state to know a certain, and not like two decades in a row.

              The position of the PRC is an example to us - everyone protests the way, and we will build a military airfield in the disputed territories, protest further.
              1. NDR-791
                NDR-791 April 28 2016 18: 26
                0
                I think we won’t find out.
                So we didn’t understand what the hell this "even a plane" was on Red Square. But we know perfectly well how it ended. Therefore, I ask, can anyone have heard the position of the COUNTRY !!! As you wish, and WE MUST KNOW! If in the presence of the president the rocket did not take off, then we will survive, but if someone else is going to fall on his head, then "the rescue of the drowning is the work of the drowning themselves" or do we still live in the STATE ???
                1. Tibidokh
                  Tibidokh April 28 2016 19: 03
                  +1
                  Quote: NDR-791
                  COUNTRY position !!! As you want, and WE SHOULD KNOW!

                  Pleases your indifference. However, I would like to warn you - the final truth is always reported obscenities. laughing
                  1. NDR-791
                    NDR-791 April 28 2016 19: 14
                    +1
                    Unfortunately, you are right! And as it flies in, then "Brothers and Sisters !!!". So it was always with us, eh sadness, and even in the "partisans" I should not be taken. At least from the inside to look at what has changed in 27 years. You look and would not ask idiotic questions - you would see it yourself.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 16: 52
      +3
      "Exceptional" still can not get used to the idea that they are already nichrome not exceptional.
    4. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z April 28 2016 17: 17
      0
      Quote: Wend
      Again, the mattresses are breaking off. Well don't let them quietly spy

      Why is Poseidon flying? Poseidon used to be the lord of the underwater seems to be the god of the seas?
      So what the hell is he flying, especially near our naval bases ?!
      Its place at the bottom of the sea! am
    5. Koshak
      Koshak April 28 2016 21: 35
      +4
      Quote: Wend
      Again, the mattresses are breaking off. Well don't let them quietly spy laughing

      Well, how much can you admire this crap. I served 25 years in the reconnaissance regiment (Tu-95RTs) and NATO interceptors have always hung on our planes from Bear to the Strait zone. And no one has ever made a sensation out of it. And our interceptors always accompanied their "Orions" and the adversaries never resented. And recently, the usual routine work of pilots, both from our side and from their side, is presented almost as the beginning of the "third world". Idiocy, damn it.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 28 2016 21: 57
        +3
        Quote: Koshak
        I served 25 years in the reconnaissance regiment (Tu-95RC)

        - taking off my hat..

        Quote: Koshak
        and NATO interceptors have always hung on our planes from Bear to the Strait zone. And no one has ever made a sensation out of it. And our interceptors always accompanied their "Orions" and the adversaries never resented

        - I read a lot on these topics .. thank you for confirming what I read

        Quote: Koshak
        And recently, the usual routine work of pilots, both from our side and from their side, is presented almost as the beginning of the "third world". Idiocy, damn it

        - well, we must somehow "warm up" the people. Although in fact - yes, it is idiocy .. and damn it.

        PS: here recently the Su-24 flew past Cook. If you compare with what Pliev did in 1968 with Essex, it’s easy to make jokes with Cook. And the Americans did not take offense then, and the people did not know anything .. somehow it was more correct then, IMHO ..

        Here, about Pliev, for those who are not in the know:

      2. WUA 518
        WUA 518 April 28 2016 22: 13
        +1
        Quote: Koshak
        our interceptors their "Orions"

        From the same Yelizov, when the Su-15TMs were still there, a pair of Orion was raised. The leader stood to the right of the Orion, the wingman went downhill, but did not calculate the height and gurgled. I had a good time before that bones overboard. True, he injured his spine and was treated for a long time. Later he flew the AN-2.
    6. 222222
      222222 April 28 2016 21: 37
      0
      An American P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft was intercepted in the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet's base off the coast of Kamchatka @
      ... "interception" and "identification of an air target" "with its fixation in the photo and video. different concepts ... especially since the R-8 ...
      1. Koshak
        Koshak April 28 2016 22: 09
        +4
        Quote: 222222
        An American P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft was intercepted in the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet's base off the coast of Kamchatka @
        ... "interception" and "identification of an air target" "with its fixation in the photo and video. different concepts ... especially since the R-8 ...

        If the fighter is close enough to destroy the intercepted aircraft, this is an "interception" and does not have to be destroyed. NATO pilots are paid for this if he brings back pictures of the "enemy" plane he intercepted. As far as I know, a NATO pilot, in order to receive the award, had to photograph the tail number of our aircraft. And in order to prevent him from doing this, when he came under our "belly" for shooting, we turned on the landing lights (the tail number was printed on the doors of the front leg of the chassis next to the headlights) and in the picture he got a continuous illumination. Sometimes they even gestured for permission to take a photo. True, it was in those times that are well shown in the Soviet film "Case in the square 36-80" By the way, our regiment also took part in the filming of this film.
        1. WUA 518
          WUA 518 April 28 2016 22: 26
          +1
          Quote: Koshak
          "Case in square 36-80" By the way, our regiment also took part in the filming of this film.

          Quote: Koshak
          the tail number was marked on the cusps of the front leg of the chassis next to the headlights

          I have a question for you, in the film I remember for sure there was a moment where there was number 13 on the flap. What really was a board with that number or did the guys poke themselves?
          1. WUA 518
            WUA 518 April 28 2016 22: 34
            +1
            Quote: WUA 518
            I remember there was a moment where there was number 13 on the flap.
          2. Koshak
            Koshak April 28 2016 22: 56
            +2
            Quote: WUA 518
            I have a question for you, in the film I remember for sure there was a moment where there was number 13 on the flap. What really was a board with that number or did the guys poke themselves?

            A Tu-13 was shown in the film with an onboard 16, I can't say anything about it. I served on the Tu-95 RC. But we also had a plane with tail number "13" in the regiment for some time
            1. WUA 518
              WUA 518 April 28 2016 23: 10
              +3
              There was a case, I don’t remember which regiment in Kupino or in Dombarovka. The guys drew an ace of spades on the MiG-23 sapling crest. Ankylite crest is released after take-off, and it is necessary to skip the regiment to the UPC. Wow and there was a scream! laughing
  2. Fitter65
    Fitter65 April 28 2016 16: 48
    0
    Again unprofessional, and in violation of everything ...
  3. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets April 28 2016 16: 52
    +2
    "The interception took place in a safe and professional manner."

    No one scared this time? what
    1. Runx135
      Runx135 April 28 2016 17: 16
      +1
      Safety is measured by the amount of dirty pants. Either we got a grated crew, or we started using diapers. laughing
  4. Aristide
    Aristide April 28 2016 16: 54
    +1
    If the Americans called the place of accumulation of Soviet submarines "hornet's nest", today, in order to confuse everyone, they must name the place of interception of their aircraft in the airspace of the Russian Federation - a barrel of saury. These Yankees, such inventors!
  5. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 16: 54
    +3
    "The incident took place on April 21 in Northeast Asia, not far from the Kamchatka Peninsula. According to officials of the US Department of Defense, Russia is thus again" rattling weapons. ..
    As the US military specified, next to the scene of the incident is the Russian city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. A US defense official familiar with the situation stated that the MiG-31 flew very close to the P-8 - 15 meters ...
    The Boeing P-8 could possibly spy on Russian submarines, in particular, on some new missile submarine in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky ...
    1. Izotovp
      Izotovp April 28 2016 16: 58
      +3
      Spied on "Yuri Dolgoruky", radish. It looks like with the MiG-31 it is necessary to send an electronic warfare plane together and turn them off fuck all their peepers and listeners !!!
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 28 2016 17: 01
        +2
        Quote: Izotovp
        Spied on "Yuri Dolgoruky", radish. It looks like with the MiG-31 it is necessary to send an electronic warfare plane together and turn them off fuck all their peepers and listeners !!!

        Surely the base of strategic submarines is well covered by EW means from unsolicited spies.
  6. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ April 28 2016 16: 57
    +7
    Professionally, not professionally, the main interception is completed. They would still give us grades for interception. The examiners are bad!
    1. horoh
      horoh April 28 2016 17: 08
      +2
      Professionally or not professionally, but these bastards need to be scammed hard so that they wouldn’t fly close !!!
  7. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock April 28 2016 17: 08
    +3
    When will our new anti-submarine aircraft based on the Tu-204SM appear, for example? All the same, it's time to change the IL-38 to something newer. The new aircraft and the range of patrols and speed and carrying capacity (more you can install a variety of equipment) is significantly higher than the IL-38.
    1. Tibidokh
      Tibidokh April 28 2016 17: 21
      0
      Are you talking about the Tu-204P? But didn’t this project close in favor of the Tu-330?
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 28 2016 17: 40
        +3
        Quote: Tibidokh
        What about Tu-204P? But didn’t this project close in favor of the Tu-330?

        I don’t hear anything about the Tu-330, it’s essentially IL-214 (there was also an MIT program with India), the project was frozen.
        In any case, there is a modern Tu-204SM aircraft (new avionics, electronics 2 crew members, etc., etc. 2010 model), on its basis it is better to revive the Tu-204P project. The aircraft is mass-produced and on its basis it will be easier to create a new anti-submarine aircraft than to design a new glider, put it into production, etc.

        1. Izotovp
          Izotovp April 28 2016 19: 30
          +1
          Maybe the Defense Ministry is waiting for ms-21 right away?
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock April 29 2016 14: 39
            0
            Quote: Izotovp
            Maybe the Defense Ministry is waiting for ms-21 right away?

            MS-21 will be built in large quantities for the civilian market, in this regard a lot of time can pass until the turn reaches the Moscow Region.
            Tu-204SM are being built in much smaller batches and this would be a great opportunity to support the Aviastar plant with orders.
            1. Izotovp
              Izotovp April 30 2016 21: 51
              0
              For some reason, it seems to me that Shoigu will not be able to refuse))))
  8. aba
    aba April 28 2016 17: 12
    0
    Perhaps, for the first time in recent years, US fighters intercepted an American reconnaissance aircraft by a Russian fighter as “safe and professional.”

    It was necessary to bring him down, otherwise the expectations of the American "partners" were not justified. And "partners" shouldn't be disappointed!
  9. Velizariy
    Velizariy April 28 2016 17: 14
    +1
    Is interception in international space not an act of aggression leading to war? Maybe he still accompanied the scout and not intercepted? Or did I misunderstand the terms?
  10. demchuk.ig
    demchuk.ig April 28 2016 17: 14
    +1
    I think the tantrum will start anyway! The main thing is that there was an interception!
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 April 28 2016 17: 29
      +7
      Most of the comments are kindergarten pants with straps. Again underwear, diapers .... Not tired of the same threshing keyboard warriors? "States are obliged to prevent their military aircraft from creating a threat to the flight safety of aircraft of other states, as well as to the safety of navigation. For this purpose, the states conclude treaties on the prevention of incidents on the high seas and airspace above it. In particular, simulated attacks are not allowed. by imitating the use of weapons against aircraft and ships; performing dangerous overflights of foreign ships by military aircraft and any other actions posing a danger both to flights in airspace and to navigation on the high seas. "
      1. 933454818
        933454818 April 28 2016 17: 44
        +2
        What are you quoting? Did the Americans sign this document? And then the Yankee's favorite trick is not to sign international treaties and conventions and then naturally not to execute them, but to demand execution from all signatories ...
        1. WUA 518
          WUA 518 April 28 2016 17: 51
          +1
          Quote: 933454818
          What are you quoting? Did the Americans sign this document? AND
          The agreement on the prevention of incidents in the open sea and in the airspace over it, the United States and the USSR signed another May 25, 1972. Its validity period was three years, after which the contract is regularly renewed.
          1. Izotovp
            Izotovp April 28 2016 19: 34
            +1
            Unfortunately you are right, and our actions are, so to speak, on the brink. And all our actions are illuminated very brightly in the whole world, but ... are there really no provocations on their part ?! Yes, I can’t believe in life that the exceptional behave strictly within the framework of the laws, just maybe ours don’t trumpet it like that?
            1. WUA 518
              WUA 518 April 28 2016 19: 54
              +3
              Quote: Izotovp
              Unfortunately you are right and our actions, so to speak, are on the verge of

              I do not want to say anything, here is information for consideration. All instructions are written in blood, sometimes a lot of blood. And what can happen with incident in neutral waters, there is not much imagination needed.
              1. Izotovp
                Izotovp April 28 2016 20: 40
                +1
                I perfectly understand and agree.
  11. Sobol
    Sobol April 28 2016 17: 21
    +1
    ABOUT! Again, their State Department in our Foreign Ministry toilet paper (that is, a note) will throw.
  12. FID
    FID April 28 2016 17: 51
    +4
    That is why the Americans can use jet aircraft as anti-submarine warriors, and our "generals" believe that the Tu-204 will not cope ???? That he flies too fast, and the B-737 is slow ???
  13. gcn
    gcn April 28 2016 17: 56
    +2
    The North Americans are not sure that in Vilyuchinsk not the life-size models of our boats, they sent a plane to irradiate and take in all the details, because the satellites (due to bad weather or something else) lost their base from constant observation, maybe during this time half of the boats escaped to combat duty is not known where this mess is. JOKE ...
  14. Disorder
    Disorder April 28 2016 18: 40
    +1
    On April 21, the P-8 Poseidon reconnaissance aircraft of the US Navy Patrol Aviation, performing a planned mission in international airspace, was intercepted by a Russian MiG-31 fighter near the Kamchatka Peninsula, "said the official representative of the US Pacific Command, Commander (Captain second rank) Dave Benham.

    lol And so every planned flight happens.
  15. staryivoin
    staryivoin April 28 2016 18: 40
    -2
    Russian fiery fox (MiG-31 - "Firefox" according to NATO classification) chased the mamatras "Poseidon" and sent it to the previous registration or registration address. Clean, professional, masterful. In general - Yankesy, go home !!!!
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 April 28 2016 19: 23
      +1
      Quote: staryivoin
      (MiG-31 - "Firefox" by NATO classification)

      This is a classification by Craig Thomas. Many call this author the predecessor of Tom Clancy. And according to the NATO Foxhound - a foxhound.
  16. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 28 2016 19: 32
    -1
    Quote: cniza
    And if it is closer to 15 meters, then this would not be professional.

    It could have been closer, but the Americans are not holding the line well.
  17. sabakina
    sabakina April 28 2016 19: 40
    +1
    04:28 17/04/2016 20 6169
    US complains about Russian interception of reconnaissance aircraft over Baltic
    Moscow, April 17 - AIF-Moscow.
    The representative of the European command of the US Armed Forces Danny Hernandez said that the US reconnaissance aircraft RC-135 was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 over the Baltic Sea, reports TASS.
    Hernandez explained that the Russian plane “made erratic and aggressive maneuvers” by flying 50 feet (15 meters) from the edge of the wing of an American plane. According to him, a Russian fighter flew over an American plane.
    This is what I cannot understand ... 15 meters in the Baltic and 15 meters in Kamchatka. But, over the Baltic it is unprofessional, but in Kamchatka it is normal. Or the Su-27 then decided to play around and "cut"?
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 April 28 2016 20: 23
      +1
      Quote: sabakina
      This is what I can’t understand.

      You yourself answered your question.
      Quote: sabakina
      Su-27 over the Baltic Sea, reports TASS.
      Hernandez explained that the Russian plane "made erratic and aggressive maneuvers", flying at a distance of 50
      1. sabakina
        sabakina April 28 2016 22: 14
        +2
        Well, I think we do not have to take experience ...
  18. Orionvit
    Orionvit April 28 2016 19: 45
    -4
    Quote: Tibidokh
    Quote: NDR-791

    What are you! This is evidence, evidence of Russian aggression. In no case can not be washed, let it fly. drinks

    Something like that.
  19. Lester7777
    Lester7777 April 28 2016 19: 47
    -3
    What, really, even the help of a psychologist was not needed? Only diapers changed?
    1. Koshak
      Koshak April 28 2016 23: 38
      +5
      Quote: Lester7777
      What, really, even the help of a psychologist was not needed? Only diapers changed?

      You guys already got the topic of "diapers". This is an everyday RUTINE. It's just that politicians and zhurnalyugi are trying to make some kind of stunning "Sensation" on this, and you play along with them. I think the Poseidon pilots weren't even too tense. In the 70s and 80s, this happened every day, they intercepted us, and we intercepted them, and no one yelled about some diapers.
  20. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 April 28 2016 20: 31
    -1
    approached a distance of at least 15 m.
    15 meters closer is already scary
  21. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff April 28 2016 20: 54
    -1
    Where are NATO mongrels in Europe? Why didn’t they scream, did Poseidod need to bring down the MiG-31?
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 April 28 2016 21: 17
      +1
      Quote: Denis-Skiff
      Why do not shout, it was necessary for Poseidod to bring down the MiG-31

      Than? deep bombs, torpedoes, or rcp harpoon?
  22. Neophyte
    Neophyte April 28 2016 21: 01
    +1
    An interception with a forced landing would be understandable, and so, neither this nor that?
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 April 28 2016 21: 18
      +1
      Quote: Neophyte
      A forced landing intercept would have been understandable

      On what basis?
  23. Olegater
    Olegater April 28 2016 21: 38
    0
    Is it too much for these bankrupt ones to allow themselves (a louse grunts noticeably in a year or two given their external and internal problems, which they do not want to notice and solve). Rather, it is the agony of a rat cornered. Unfortunately, this animal louse is infected with Russophobia and aggression. Permissiveness for the collapse, and in fact the occupation of other countries, has a very bad effect on the behavior of their politicians and military personnel. Now I’ve read an article that staff members are considering incidents like that in the Baltic leading to military clashes between lice and Russia - there’s no just words to comment on (mat, mat, mat .................. ) Too many such incidents on land in the air and at sea occur near our borders, dear forum users do not find?
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff April 28 2016 21: 56
    -4
    Quote: WUA 518
    Quote: Denis-Skiff
    Why do not shout, it was necessary for Poseidod to bring down the MiG-31

    Than? deep bombs, torpedoes, or rcp harpoon?

    Well, flashed so flashed.)) Ekspert.
    It's not about what, but who and where. They wanted to get the Su-24 mongrel, but the owner does not understand their barking.
  26. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets April 28 2016 22: 04
    0
    The pilots have their own rituals for receiving their colleagues from abroad, although there are precedents, to recall at least how Vasily Tsimbal expelled Orion from the patrol area, first poured him with kerosene drain, and then, during a maneuver, accidentally substituted him with a keel under one of the screws, fragments of screws hit in the next engine and the scout immediately went home. This is what they have done with the insolent these days.
  27. NordUral
    NordUral April 28 2016 22: 22
    -1
    In the area of ​​the Pacific Fleet base off the coast of Kamchatka American P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft intercepted

    My question is - did the R-8 cross the border? And then somehow slurred. If violated, then I think there is a proven process for forcing us to land.
    1. assenizator
      assenizator April 29 2016 04: 31
      0
      Here I am about the same thing. It's time to punish the scammers.
  28. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 April 29 2016 02: 57
    0
    Jackal !!! So they are looking around the world, where else to spoil !!! This is not a hornet's nest, it is tryndets to you, if anything.
  29. assenizator
    assenizator April 29 2016 04: 23
    0
    Maybe I'm wrong, maybe this is an overly radical measure that could lead to an armed confrontation between Russia and the United States, but it seems to me that it is no longer necessary to intercept air targets, but to bring them down to hell.
    If this is not done, then the US Air Force provocations will not stop. It is time to indicate their place to the Americans.
    1. Alexdark
      Alexdark April 29 2016 05: 03
      0
      They did not enter the airspace of the country. Cold mind is much better than a hot head with radical ideas.
  30. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 29 2016 05: 41
    0
    And rightly so, do not get the hell out of it striped, we have the Kura training ground there, the base of underwater missile carriers. It was necessary to shuranut in front of the nose, to give a satellite jet at full throttle, so that he would somersault, so that it would be inconsistent in the future.
  31. Wolka
    Wolka April 29 2016 06: 16
    -1
    but it was also necessary to cut the electronic warfare funds to the full, so that this fly from the Yankees crashed into the sea
  32. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 29 2016 07: 12
    -2
    From the article it is not clear whether the border was violated or not. If so, then he just had to be planted and pressed in full.