Military Review

US congressmen are considering the possibility of deploying medium-range missiles in response to Russia's "violation" of the INF Treaty

63
The Commission on Armed Forces of the US Congress discusses the issue of deploying medium-range missiles in response to violations of the INF Treaty, attributed to Russia, reports RIA News statement by congressman John Garamendi.


US congressmen are considering the possibility of deploying medium-range missiles in response to Russia's "violation" of the INF Treaty


“Russia has violated the INF Treaty. Now that they have (missiles), we are preparing a defensive mechanism, and we are talking about building America’s medium-range missiles, ”
Garamendi told Sputnik.

The publication notes that "if the proposal is approved, then the US Department of Defense will study the advantages of US ballistic and ground-based cruise missiles with non-nuclear warheads with a range from 300 to 3,4 thousands of miles."

Washington periodically accuses Moscow of violations of the INF Treaty, pointing to the appearance in the Russian army of a certain ultramodern medium-range missile prohibited by the Treaty. In Moscow, such accusations are called groundless and state that they themselves have a number of complaints about the United States fulfilling the conditions of the INF.
Photos used:
http://prousa.info
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Scoun
    Scoun April 28 2016 10: 45
    +25
    Sometimes I am very sad from the fact that the United States is so far away (((they can aim medium and short-range missiles at us through cancer of standing vassals without worrying about the consequences for themselves and we cannot (((... well, we have no opportunity to "threaten "from Canada, Mexico or Cuba. recourse
    1. Yuri from Volgograd
      Yuri from Volgograd April 28 2016 10: 51
      +3
      Quote: Scoun
      Sometimes I feel very sad that the USA is so far recourse

      Well, yes, only Alaska is close, but the main 3/14ndosia is really far.
      1. cniza
        cniza April 28 2016 11: 08
        +15
        Well, they found a reason - "Russia is violating", but what about the evidence? What evidence? we said it violates ...
        1. Lukich
          Lukich April 28 2016 11: 40
          +5
          Quote: cniza
          and evidence? What evidence?

          when did they need them? shook a bag of detergent and that's it, Hussein on the gallows, Iraq in ruins
        2. Saratoga833
          Saratoga833 April 28 2016 17: 33
          0
          In my opinion, this Medium-Range Missile Treaty is completely unnecessary to us! He does not meet modern realities! The states are far away, and their military bases are under our nose! What will we answer in case of emergency (God forbid)? These racquets would come in handy here!
          1. alexmach
            alexmach April 28 2016 21: 05
            +1
            But how do you like American medium-range missiles in the Baltic states or near Kharkov?
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Amurets
        Amurets April 28 2016 11: 17
        +3
        Quote: Yuri from Volgograd
        Well, yes, only Alaska is close, but the main 3/14ndosia is really far.

        The whole territory of the USA was perfectly shot from Chukotka. A pioneer could reach Mexico.
        Quote: cniza
        Well, they found a reason - "Russia is violating", but what about the evidence? What evidence? we said it violates ...

        And we need to believe! And then they came up with some kind of geography, an arc of a large circle.
      4. Rus2012
        Rus2012 April 28 2016 11: 45
        +3
        Quote: Yuri from Volgograd
        here is the main 3 / 14ndosia really far.

        ... if necessary, "Calibers" from 20-40ft containers will be taken from any dry cargo ship ...

        And the nuclear underwater self-propelled gun of the Status-6 project will cool down any attempts by extravagant congressmen ...
        What do we know about "Status-6", besides those discussed on the net -
        ... burn to flood and infect all ports on the US coast. There are not many of them - about 17 pieces, and not all of them can accept large ocean vessels. This will automatically create the United States insurmountable problems in logistics when waging war in Europe, and when obtaining resources from the occupied territories ...
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 28 2016 20: 53
          0
          Status 6 is a scarecrow - ICBMs are faster and more efficient.
        2. alexmach
          alexmach April 28 2016 21: 07
          +1
          ... if necessary, "Calibers" from 20-40ft containers will be taken from any dry cargo ship ..


          From which bulk carrier? Do we have bulk carriers?
    2. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 April 28 2016 10: 52
      +5
      Insanity is complete and incurable.
      1. jjj
        jjj April 28 2016 10: 57
        +4
        They already had Pershing in Europe once
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 April 28 2016 10: 57
      +3
      The states are far away, but their NATO jackals are within reach. And for staff, we have other missiles.
      1. amirbek
        amirbek April 28 2016 11: 18
        +1
        Quote: DMB_95
        And for staff, we have other missiles.

        the era of flying swords and endurance ... the boom of a whale will not shoot first
    4. vkl.47
      vkl.47 April 28 2016 10: 59
      +10
      I already said that Fashington, as always, is humpbacking. He doesn’t give a damn about everything. He invents news and threats for himself. I’m swimming there on Russian submarines. They answered who saw? where are the facts? and they said yes there. The information is not verified but we definitely know a hundred are Russians.
      as in that joke. the world symposium of doctors. in the finals, Russians and Americans brag about achievements in the medicine. The American says "our soldier in Vietnam shattered his eyes. So we put in his billiard balls and he sees everything", well, they clap and gasp. the doctor says, “this is nonsense. here our soldier in Afghanistan was torn off an egg on a mine. so we sewed an udder from a cow, he gives milk and girls e ...” Americans ask “come on! but who saw this?” and our answers “your! with wooden eyes!”
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 28 2016 11: 03
        +5
        It was not necessary at all to initially sign this agreement.
      2. Lukich
        Lukich April 28 2016 11: 44
        +1
        Quote: vkl.47
        I already said that Fashington, as always, is making a hunchback. He doesn’t give a damn about everything. He invents news and threats for himself. I’m floating there on Russian submarines. Whoever answered видел where are the facts?

        and psaki’s brilliant answer, I’ll go to the office to find out, then I’ll tell
    5. NordUral
      NordUral April 28 2016 11: 07
      +2
      Yes, that’s true, but they won’t stay too long, although it will be much more difficult and expensive. And European rulers are killers of their own countries. I hope so. that the peoples of Europe will understand this and make a choice.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 April 28 2016 11: 36
        +5
        Quote: NordUral
        the peoples of Europe will understand this and make a choice

        ... but what about? laughing
        THEIR ALREADY DONE -
        raped and stalled. Now they are happy that every day there is pottage in the trough ... and not every day is raped ...
      2. Lukich
        Lukich April 28 2016 11: 47
        +4
        Quote: NordUral
        I hope so. that the peoples of Europe will understand this and make a choice.

        do not flatter yourself. in the Netherlands in a referendum made a choice. how it is known
    6. Lex.
      Lex. April 28 2016 11: 42
      +1
      Well, why can’t you eat submarines. Just increase their number and constantly patrol
      1. Scoun
        Scoun April 28 2016 11: 51
        +4
        Quote: Lex.
        Well, why can’t you eat submarines. Just increase their number and constantly patrol

        Expensive.
        And so across the border he threw a "grenade" in return and felt like it was immediately easier ... Or even switched to a "fist" kneading ... and here it was thin because of the Poles. labuses and others ready to substitute themselves, they begin to threaten ...
        1. Lex.
          Lex. April 28 2016 13: 15
          +2
          You have to pay for security and status 6 is on the way.
        2. Lex.
          Lex. April 28 2016 13: 15
          +2
          You have to pay for security and status 6 is on the way.
      2. kirieeleyson
        kirieeleyson April 28 2016 16: 02
        +1
        Just increase their number

        Oh, how difficult it is)))
    7. volot-voin
      volot-voin April 28 2016 11: 55
      +3
      Quote: Scoun
      Sometimes I am very sad that the USA is so far (((they can through vassals

      In response, it would be nice to deploy missiles in Cuba and Venezuela. The United States then ... there will be a chair and stink all over the world. But as in the 60s, during the Caribbean crisis, they will want to agree. America will then become closer))))
      1. fif21
        fif21 April 28 2016 15: 51
        +2
        Quote: volot-voin
        In response, it would be nice to deploy missiles in Cuba and Venezuela
        It's time for a long time already, otherwise Trump is threatening to negotiate with Russia from a position of strength. Yes, and Obama's statements in England directly indicate that Russia has no place in a European home. USA, EU, England gentlemen, the rest are the service staff. This will not end in good. what
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. avvg
    avvg April 28 2016 10: 51
    +10
    Our Ancestors correctly said that in front of the "Naglo-Saxons" Russia is always to blame, they will always find a reason for hatred, they are afraid of our vastness, Russia has no friends.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 28 2016 10: 51
    +4
    US congressmen are considering the possibility of deploying medium-range missiles in response to Russia's "violation" of the INF Treaty

    Now it’s 100% clear why the Americans have lately been reproaching us for violating the treaty - so that congressmen are more accommodating and do not complain in other countries. Purely in the American style to blame another in order to violate the agreement.
  4. Andrey K
    Andrey K April 28 2016 10: 53
    +10
    Enchanting skill, put everything upside down and declare black white. There is no limit to arrogance and cynicism am
    1. Tektor
      Tektor April 28 2016 11: 39
      0
      We have no right to ignore and not respond to provocations. If they want to escalate psychosis around our borders, then we must answer clearly. Will they put medium-range missiles? So beeches are needed. Is there a danger from the sea? It is necessary to plan minefields, and also consider the deployment of weapons (such as Caliber-K, Uran-K) on civilian vessels. Well, to the maximum place different types of weapons on the upper decks of landing ships. For example, the same Buki or Torah, Coalition or Malku. It is necessary to systematically build up defense potential and reconnaissance assets, including unmanned ones.
  5. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 28 2016 10: 54
    +1
    That's because they are silly, they are afraid, but they do. They think they won’t get it, and how else.
  6. sir_obs
    sir_obs April 28 2016 11: 02
    +7
    When exchanging notes with the states, you need to remember only two rules, on x .. it is written separately, and poh .. is written together
  7. Exumer
    Exumer April 28 2016 11: 03
    +2
    As the saying goes, a drum around the neck ........ Open the gentlemen’s cards as much as you can whine, so they’ve already overlaid on all sides.
  8. There are a lot of us
    There are a lot of us April 28 2016 11: 04
    +5
    Whatever the Americans do, the main thing for the Russian armed forces is to maintain the permanent ability to strip the United States and its allies to zero, without particularly bothering with the type of combat units used, such as nuclear-non-nuclear ...
    1. Exumer
      Exumer April 28 2016 11: 29
      -2
      I think in order to completely reassure our partners and all NATA, it is enough to once in one place to gasp. There will be a howl, and the answer, of course, is in the form of all possible sanctions (well, of course, this is only my opinion).
    2. amirbek
      amirbek April 28 2016 11: 36
      0
      Quote: There are many of us
      scratch the US and its allies to zero

      do not forget to correctly calculate the load so that the continents do not come into active movement and think over counter options in case of intervention of otherworldly forces
  9. na76
    na76 April 28 2016 11: 10
    +1
    It is unclear what is the point of concluding any agreements with the SGA if they are wiped off at any convenient moment.
  10. bad
    bad April 28 2016 11: 15
    0
    it would be necessary to de facto withdraw from the RMND and secretly (as our military knows how to do this) hobble their missiles in Cuba and Syria with warheads of the appropriate moshnosti and protect them with 400 and wait for them to find them .. maybe remember about the Caribbean crisis .. winked
  11. Arkan
    Arkan April 28 2016 11: 16
    -1
    US congressmen are considering the possibility of deploying medium-range missiles in response to Russia's "violation" of the INF Treaty


    The Americans got scared of the "Caliber", so they make various obscene sounds. If they deploy their missiles in Europe, then this, on the one hand, will untie our hands (there is probably a ground analogue of "Caliber") for the deployment of similar missiles, but, on the other hand, it will greatly complicate the work of our missile defense system and change the balance of forces, not in our favor, in the European theater of operations. It is necessary to study the issue of placing medium-range missiles in Latin America. There is already an agreement with Nicaragua to call our warships into its ports. With the appropriate information support for these actions, you can force Americans to refrain from ill-considered actions.
    1. 31rus2
      31rus2 April 28 2016 11: 29
      0
      Dear, the placement of RSDs in the EU is only the first step, then, as it was already, Turkey, Japan, all this changes the balance of power and will require large expenditures from Russia both on the aerospace forces and RSD, and on the whole strategy
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 28 2016 20: 55
        -1
        We will create electronic warfare systems that destroy the electronics of cruise missiles and ICBM warheads - cheaply and angrily.
  12. iouris
    iouris April 28 2016 11: 16
    +1
    NATO is expanding, the transatlantic empire is strengthening, while the USSR and the ATS do not exist, which means that the INF Treaty is dead.
  13. Wedmak
    Wedmak April 28 2016 11: 21
    0
    US Department of Defense will study the benefits of U.S. ballistic and land-based cruise missiles with non-nuclear warheads ranging from 300 to 3,4 thousands of miles

    So you have them? And you destroyed them, as prescribed by the contract? Then very interesting questions arise ...
  14. 31rus2
    31rus2 April 28 2016 11: 22
    +1
    Dear, that’s the whole of Europe, missiles in Europe, and American congressmen decide, as always wait for a response, only then don’t whine
  15. 7 poplar
    7 poplar April 28 2016 11: 30
    0
    Well, as always, triple standards!
  16. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 28 2016 11: 31
    +2
    Interestingly, and the United States will be interested in the opinion of European countries before realizing its threat?
    After all, this event will jeopardize, first of all, Europe.
    But the United States will also get its own in case of what ...
  17. magician
    magician April 28 2016 11: 38
    0
    Are they getting an adequate response? So he will not linger, and will be very adequate. We will place more air defense systems at the borders, shoot down missiles, albeit over foreign territory. fellow
  18. LVMI1980
    LVMI1980 April 28 2016 11: 47
    +1
    1) They do not have ground-based medium-range missiles (of the Pershing type)
    2) they still need to be developed
    3) the production base (technological lines, equipment, etc.) must be done with 0
    1. mQn
      mQn April 28 2016 11: 54
      +1
      and tomahawks?
  19. nrex
    nrex April 28 2016 11: 53
    +1
    Quote: Lukich
    Quote: cniza
    and evidence? What evidence?

    when did they need them? shook a bag of detergent and that's it, Hussein on the gallows, Iraq in ruins


    Have you noticed that MATTRESSES have not bothered themselves recently with evidence of anything? They put their opinion basic and unshakable, above any evidence.
  20. Ima tsoh
    Ima tsoh April 28 2016 11: 55
    +7
    Think and appreciate the tactics of amers. Placed under our side everything that exists to kill hoping with confidence that we will declare that we will take adequate action without war. At some stage, they will still get a certain advantage in terms of geographical conditions. And at that moment, they can suddenly start a war. Surprise, geographical conditions, the manufacturability of weapons and quantity can push these freaks to war with the mania that they will survive. In these conditions, Russia should reject all the treaties that restrain it in military operations and in preparation for these actions. To calculate the strategic point of no return, an acceptable situation for us, and to suddenly destroy the core of this US system and everything that threatens us. The enemy’s intentions are the war against us. They feed us with political words, preparing us for worship. Let the states themselves be completely destroyed than we are.
    1. gg.na
      gg.na April 28 2016 13: 03
      +1
      Quote: Ima tsoh
      In these conditions, Russia should reject all the treaties that restrain it in military operations and in preparation for these actions.

      Yes-ahhhh !!! Ohhhhhhzhzhzh !!! Everything goes to sad the war. Today I walked along the street, suddenly sirens howled at many enterprises recourse ......, Yes, the ecstasy babai, don’t believe the frost on the skin ... I just imagined that this was not a test siren but a real one. belay
  21. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 April 28 2016 12: 04
    +1
    Quote: Exumer
    I think in order to completely reassure our partners and all NATA, it is enough to once in one place to gasp. There will be a howl, and the answer, of course, is in the form of all possible sanctions (well, of course, this is only my opinion).

    As an option, to tear down England, and everything will shut up!
    1. gg.na
      gg.na April 28 2016 13: 06
      +1
      Quote: kostyan77708
      As an option, to tear down England, and everything will shut up!

      No No. they won’t shut up, they’ll even stink and scream because they’re ready for the majority of the world’s population to cease to exist, and in this situation they’re ready to lose a couple of European countries. It will just stink more and activate their rotten attempts to unleash a war.
  22. Ima tsoh
    Ima tsoh April 28 2016 12: 08
    +7
    Before the fight, the United States, demonstrating arrogance and confirming itself as an enemy of Russia, is essentially a coward with mean habits. Therefore, Russia has every right to show "super arrogance" in a good understanding of these actions, and be sure this impudent person will immediately turn into an obedient donkey to stay alive even an amoeba.
  23. Haloperidol
    Haloperidol April 28 2016 12: 09
    +5
    The US has already deployed dual-purpose launchers in the EU, supposedly anti-aircraft, but with the possibility of launching Tomahawk missiles from them, and the missiles themselves are probably already in the EU ... So we are dealing with yet another arrogant deceitful trick of Washington and its bloodthirsty thugs imagining themselves masters of the World.
    1. gg.na
      gg.na April 28 2016 12: 42
      0
      Quote: Haloperidol
      imagining themselves masters of the World.

      Hegemony-zamooooorysh-and-and-iiiii !!! laughing Gee-gee !!! wassat
  24. gg.na
    gg.na April 28 2016 12: 39
    0
    hehe bully !!! froze for what ?! Yes, damn it so that we could violate this very contract! And he had them in reserve ..., winked in case the Minsk agreements are suddenly fulfilled in order to extend the sanctions and again violate this agreement ourselves! am what aaaaaaa !!!! Well, for every tricky kidney lol have caused wink with screw wassat !!!
  25. demiurg
    demiurg April 28 2016 12: 52
    +1
    Tomahawks and calibers is of course a good thing. But they are not for the first blow.
    BRDS, it is much more dangerous, at times. From the territory of Poland to St. Petersburg and Moscow, modern analogues of Pershing will fly in 5-7 minutes. Although on the other hand, you can place them on submarines, creating a modern analogue of the r-27k.
  26. shans2
    shans2 April 28 2016 12: 54
    +1
    S-400, according to open sources, shoot down ballistic missiles with a launch range of up to 2.5 thousand km, Pershing were shorter range .... Americans have no time at all, the coming global economic crisis will bury them and multiply all their military funding by zero ... got into a bit late ...
  27. Editor
    Editor April 28 2016 12: 58
    +1
    Quote: Scoun
    Sometimes I feel very sad that the USA is so far


    close to the missile base in Chukotka.

    for some reason, the Americans do not consider their drone with a rocket as a violation of the contract ...
  28. Enoch
    Enoch April 28 2016 13: 56
    0
    From the crafty mind - the head hurts. If it explodes, it won't be enough for anyone, and all the firewood is not enough for the Zhmassons. Let them read "Woe from Wit"
  29. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 April 28 2016 14: 04
    0
    You can hysteria arbitrarily. But the essence is clear to everyone: if it begins, then the ball of the earth will fly away from its orbit. And there will be neither the poor nor the rich. Nuclear winter...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 28 2016 20: 58
      -1
      No matter where the Earth flies away - and there won’t be a nuclear winter - those parties to the conflict who use nuclear weapons against each other will perish in a nuclear war - and the rest of the world will live on, struggling with the environmental consequences of this war.
  30. Silman1985
    Silman1985 April 28 2016 14: 25
    +1
    As far as I know, the Americans themselves accuse their government of violating the conditions for the disposal of nuclear weapons! But for some reason they do not trumpet the whole world. And this gives reason to think that they are simply afraid, and it is easier to throw a "duck" in the direction of a "potential" enemy, and avert their eyes from themselves!
  31. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho April 28 2016 15: 00
    +1
    Nindos jump. Why the hell should we bomb Europe when the whole snake ball is flickering? Europe will remain - though there will be where to escape ...