Military Review

Wheat Wars: America loses to Russia (Bloomberg Businessweek, USA)

146
Wheat Wars: America loses to Russia (Bloomberg Businessweek, USA)


A strong dollar, global warming, increasing competition and not increasing yields have deprived the US of first place in the wheat market.

In Kansas, a state for which grains have a special symbolic meaning, is warmer, and winter wheat is sprouting in the fields of Paul Penner. He grows it on roughly 300 acres. Profitability, he said, depends on the state of world markets. According to the US Department of Agriculture, about two-fifths of American harvests go abroad.

However, with all the importance of exports for American farmers, American grain is losing ground in the world. Its competitiveness reduces a strong dollar, and this year the United States may slip into third place among wheat exporters, giving way to Russia and Canada. Back in 2014, the United States ranked first. In America, areas planted with wheat have been constantly declining for more than a decade. Over time, American wheat in the world markets will become smaller. This affects the plans of such farmers as Penner - the former president of the National Association of Wheat Producers. This year he plans to plant an equal amount of corn and wheat. "People vote with a wallet," says Penner, who owns 660 acres of land in 50 miles north of Wichita. In the 1970s, 90% of its fields were planted with wheat. “Our products retain the highest quality, but the technology for growing corn and soybeans has advanced greatly, and in terms of earnings, wheat has become a less attractive option,” he admits.

This year, wheat exports are expected to decline by 9,3% - to 21,1 million tons in a season ending May 31. As government statistics show, this is the minimum level since 1972 of the year. At the same time, domestic grain reserves are at a record level in five years. All this encourages farmers not to sow wheat. The area of ​​winter wheat sowing, according to the Ministry of Agriculture, has decreased to the second since the end of the level since the 1913 year.

The lands of Ukraine and the Russian Black Sea coast are considered to be among the best in the world for growing wheat. Tsarist Russia was its main global exporter. However, by 1972, because of the shortcomings of the communist government, wheat production in these regions fell so much that the Soviet Union even had to buy grain in America.

Now Russia has again taken the first place, and Ukraine got the fifth. They seize the Middle Eastern markets, which were once the main destination for American wheat. In Canada, the world's second largest exporter, the climate is getting warmer, which lengthens the growing season and increases yields. Argentina, Australia, France, Germany, Kazakhstan and Eastern European countries are also increasing their supply to the market.

All of this put an end to the undivided leadership of the United States in world markets, says Alan Tracy, president of the American Wheat Association, which promotes American wheat abroad. “Now we are unlikely to lead each year in terms of volumes,” he says. “Fortunately, in general, world wheat trade has grown, and we can still sell our farmers' products.”

The attractiveness of wheat for American farmers has declined, since this culture was not affected by two revolutions, which advanced corn and soybeans, biotech and biofuel. In 1990, the area of ​​wheat crops last exceeded the area of ​​corn crops. Since then, areas under wheat have been reduced by 36%. This year, they are projected to make 49,6 a million acres. On the contrary, corn is now occupied by 26% more area than in 1990 year (93,6 million acres), and under soybeans - by 42% (82,2 million acres).

Since the end of 1990, virtually all corn and soybeans in the United States have been genetically modified. This allows them better than before, to resist the pests and the vagaries of the weather. As a result, their productivity and profitability increased markedly. Genetically modified crops also need less water, and this allows wheat rivals to capture dry regions in the north and west.

Wheat can also be genetically modified. However, consumers do not want their staple foods, such as bread, to be made from genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Therefore, commercial supply of biotech wheat is not allowed anywhere in the world. This ban prevents scandals, but at the same time prevents the growth of yields. “From the very beginning, this industry did not want to introduce GMOs, fearing consumer response,” explains Allen Featherstone, an expert on agricultural economics from Kansas State University. “Time has shown that this forces farmers to switch to other crops.”

High-quality American grain still costs a dollar per bushel more than competitors' products. “We sell not so much raw material as an ingredient,” which is better suited for cookies, cakes and high-quality bread, emphasizes Tracy.

The question of the introduction of GMOs remains controversial, but industry lobbyists are now seeking to increase federal funding for research in this area, and both farmers and scientists recognize that crop yields need to be increased. Nigeria and Indonesia — two rapidly growing markets — are now becoming major buyers of American grain. At the same time, America’s strength as a supplier is reliability. For example, in 2010, Russia imposed a ban on exports because of drought, which led to unrest in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring 2011 of the year.

Wheat will always be grown in regions that are considered too cold or too dry for corn and soybeans, and the United States will continue to be a major exporter. However, this does not mean that the industry can still operate, Penner said. “There is a certain point beyond which recovery will become impossible. In my opinion, we have not approached it yet, but the competition will only continue to intensify. ”
Author:
Originator:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-20/america-is-losing-out-to-russia-in-the-wheat-wars
146 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. RUSOIVAN
    RUSOIVAN April 28 2016 19: 00
    +3
    And also in the field of ballet we are ahead of the whole planet!
    1. The black
      The black April 28 2016 19: 03
      +50
      Not many people know, but in the USA, Canada and Europe, all GMO grain, seeds are supplied by the only global transnational corporation Monsanto. This grain gives seedlings and crops, but it cannot be used as seeds - the second generation does not give seedlings - just buy again. It is proven that the use of GMOs leads to infertility and hereditary diseases ....
      Well, God grant health to the Kuban and all Russian grain growers! smile
      1. Theline
        Theline April 28 2016 19: 17
        -62
        "It has been proven that GMO use leads to infertility and hereditary diseases."
        Present this evidence before talking nonsense.
        1. sir_obs
          sir_obs April 28 2016 19: 38
          +19
          Well, show the opposite before driving the blizzard
          1. rpek32
            rpek32 April 28 2016 20: 07
            +14
            Quote: sir_obs
            Well, show the opposite before driving the blizzard

            present lack of evidence? and how is it?
            1. sir_obs
              sir_obs April 28 2016 23: 31
              +3
              Present the results of studies proving your case. No need to juggle. If you claim that your opponent is breaking nonsense, then you must answer for the bazaar (in this case, it is not called otherwise). And if there are no real weighty arguments in their innocence, to say that someone will smash this and that is to drive the blizzard.

              It is necessary to get used to refuting someone’s thesis without rounding your eyes and portraying bewilderment like a muscular young lady, but to give weighty arguments.
              1. FlyEngine
                FlyEngine April 29 2016 04: 21
                0
                Just type in "is the danger of GMOs real?"
                1. gaura
                  gaura April 29 2016 08: 34
                  -1
                  You will find and search for the benefits of GMOs. The Internet - a garbage dump that you want, you will find. The dispute has not abated for many years. But it’s obvious that the natural product is better
                  They say that bananas are already only GMOs selling
              2. VP
                VP April 29 2016 06: 36
                +6
                In fact, he is right. Somehow, in one dispute, I specifically looked for confident evidence of your "leads to infertility and hereditary diseases." He also believed that this is an axiom that does not need proof and is known to everyone.
                But, to my surprise, it was not possible to find a single intelligible proof, all the evidence was in the form of notes in yellow newspapers, in which this statement was in the form of "everyone knows."
                Therefore, it is absurd to demand proof of the absence of evidence from him. You have to "kill on the spot" with your data. If you have them, of course.
                1. Archon
                  Archon April 29 2016 07: 46
                  +1
                  perhaps someone likes it more when his favorite plant variety is obtained using chemistry or radiation, which has been actively used for more than 80 years, than through more or less precise intervention.
                  1. VP
                    VP April 29 2016 08: 10
                    0
                    The question was raised not at the level of "like / dislike" but at the level of "please provide evidence"
                    I also do not like it, but I have to admit that this is my personal subjective attitude.
                    1. krot
                      krot April 29 2016 08: 16
                      +1
                      Correctly someone said about ..: "There must be a presumption of guilt in relation to GMOs!" Research here should probably go on for a century to find out the complete picture of the impact on humans and offspring. And I don't want to find out in a few years when the full tests pass that GMOs are dangerous, and you eat them. Yes, and gene gene strife! One corn with the gene for drought-resistant feather grass may not be harmful, but with the gene for the scorpion, on the contrary! And where is the guarantee that someone does not want to inoculate the "cancer gene"? Let those who produce such rubbish devour it! And I don’t want to "eat" this G ..!
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. GSH-18
                  GSH-18 April 29 2016 10: 16
                  0
                  Quote: VP
                  He also believed that this is an axiom that is not known for proof and which everyone knows.
                  But, to my surprise, it was not possible to find a single intelligible proof, all the evidence was in the form of notes in yellow newspapers, in which this statement was in the form of "everyone knows."

                  Here's the thing. Monsanto Infernal Company (producer of these infernal mutant seeds) enjoys the full support of the ruling circles both in the United States and uses its considerable financial and political opportunities around the world to plant this rubbish and suppress independent research and disseminate their results.
                  Monsanto is nothing personal, just business. Great business! request
                  Accordingly, all real and truthful publications from the Internet are planned to be deleted. That’s all. You need to watch TV, where our scientists present the results of this gmo-poison. These guys can be trusted.
                  1. VP
                    VP April 29 2016 11: 06
                    +1
                    Quote: GSH-18
                    uses its not small financial and political opportunities around the world

                    Clear. When there are no arguments, conspiracy theories begin.
                    Quote: GSH-18
                    You need to watch TV, where our scientists present the results of this gmo-poison.

                    Give a link to the materials of these scientists. The reference to an abstract "TV" is not appropriate. RenTV I suppose?
                  2. 97110
                    97110 4 May 2016 12: 17
                    0
                    Quote: GSH-18
                    These guys can be trusted.

                    It was necessary for self-defense against the green port to obtain evidence of the harmlessness of one cargo. We concluded a contract with science, received a report on how they tormented algae, mollusks and fish, and did not find any harmfulness. We are joyful: what about utility? And this - these guys answer - is another subject of the contract. Pay - we will search.
                3. Theline
                  Theline 2 May 2016 22: 41
                  0
                  And he doesn’t have them. As in your case, it’s just everyone’s hearing because of the media that do not always interpret the information reliably. That's why they think so, considering that someone has proven harm, although they will not find evidence if they even look.
              3. Theline
                Theline 2 May 2016 22: 42
                +1
                Opponent claims harm without initial evidence, therefore he should be responsible for the bazaar, not me.
                Any molecular biologist will call a person who considers GMO products dangerous, an idiot (at best).
          2. RUSS
            RUSS April 28 2016 21: 46
            +4
            Quote: sir_obs
            Well, show the opposite before driving the blizzard

            Rospotrebnadzor: Russian experts have not proven harm to the health of GMO products
            The negative effect on human health from the consumption of GMO products has not been proved by the results of the initial monitoring of Rospotrebnadzor. This was announced by deputy head of the department Mikhail Orlov at a meeting in the State Duma on the legislative regulation of the use of genetically modified organisms in the framework of ensuring food security
            "The primary monitoring did not reveal the negative consequences of the use of GMOs," Orlov said. He noted that scientific research to identify the harm or safety of GMO products requires long-term monitoring. According to Orlov, this may require investigating several generations.
            "From our point of view, a much bigger problem is that the consumer should be informed about the GMO content in the product," he said.
            1. Dali
              Dali April 28 2016 22: 56
              +10
              Quote: RUSS
              Rospotrebnadzor: Russian experts have not proven harm to the health of GMO products

              Unfortunately, businessmen who are ready for anything for grandmas, and then even though the grass doesn’t grow, like the same officials, we also have enough in Russia ... because GMOs become safe !!!
              1. VP
                VP April 29 2016 07: 20
                0
                And you, in response to the data of businessmen, cite the data of scientists, what is the problem? Why steer away from a specific topic of harm or harmlessness to "speculate for life"?
                1. 97110
                  97110 4 May 2016 12: 22
                  0
                  Quote: VP
                  Why steer away from a specific topic of harm or harmlessness to "speculate for life"?

                  No money left. It remains "for zhist to speculate."
            2. Dali
              Dali April 28 2016 23: 16
              +6
              Quote: RUSS
              "The primary monitoring did not reveal the negative consequences of the use of GMOs," Orlov said.

              In the first generation, rats also give offspring ... but then to hell with ...
              laughing laughing laughing
              1. Dali
                Dali April 28 2016 23: 45
                +1
                By the way, not those white laboratory rats that are not residents at all ... but tenacious gray ones.
            3. sir_obs
              sir_obs April 29 2016 01: 20
              +5
              [
              Rospotrebnadzor: Russian experts have not proven harm to the health of GMO products


              Not all Rospotreb ... but a specific person promoting a topic in someone’s specific interests.
              By the way, in the same states, you can buy clean products, but they are not for everyone, since they are much more expensive.

              07.06.2012/XNUMX/XNUMX during a hearing in the State Duma, the head of the department for the organization of sanitary supervision on food hygiene of the Federal Service for the Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being (Rospotrebnadzor) Gennady Ivanov urged not to be afraid to use products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), mentioning that according to the World Health Organization (WHO), GMO products do not harm health and can even directly or indirectly contribute to its strengthening.

              GMOs are life threatening

              As arguments in support of the promotion of GMO products in Russia, Mr. Ivanov recalled that in the USA, Argentina and Brazil, products containing GMOs are not labeled at all. In Japan, only products that comprise more than 5% GMOs are marked. In Russia, the same products are labeled, which include more than 0,9% of GMOs. Ivanov also stressed that to date, 67 products derived from GMOs have been registered in Russia, 20 of which are of plant origin, and 47 are made on the basis of microorganisms.

              Statements by Mr. Gennady Ivanov, the head of the department for the organization of sanitary supervision on food hygiene of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being (Rospotrebnadzor), are inherently false and mislead consumers. Rospotrebnadzor on behalf of which he spoke in the Duma, is well aware of the negative consequences of consuming products containing GMOs and that the number of modified organisms (0,9% or less, more) does not affect the final result.

              Scientists in many countries are sounding the alarm about the creation and sale of products with GMOs. Numerous experiments by domestic and foreign scientists, in particular on rats, have proved that eating foods containing GMOs in any quantity leads to infertility. Persons who systematically consume GMO products after a short time lose the function of reproducing their own kind. Due to the harmful effects of eating GMO foods, a number of European countries in 2009 completely abandoned the production and use of GMOs.

              In Russia, experiencing and without genetically modified foods, demographic problems, the call for the creation of products containing GMOs, their promotion on the market and eating, entailing infertility, is at least extremely cynical.
              1. Theline
                Theline 2 May 2016 23: 23
                +1
                Because in the same countries where this technology is practiced, people are afraid, because someone once said about the harm.
                “Numerous experiments of domestic and foreign scientists, in particular on rats, have proved that eating foods containing GMOs in any quantity leads to infertility. Persons who systematically consume GMO foods, after a short time, lose the function of reproducing their own kind. the use of GMO foods, a number of European countries in 2009 completely abandoned the production and use of GMOs. " That famous experiment with the rat and GMO, which led to infertility of the rat, was carried out by one person, and you say that they were numerous. By the way, the rat was cancerous, so the experiment itself was carried out with a gross error. The domestic media promoted the topic adding that there were many experiments with rats, and in all the rats lost their offspring. Therefore, the article is false and unsubstantiated.
            4. 97110
              97110 4 May 2016 12: 20
              0
              Quote: RUSS
              Rospotrebnadzor: Russian experts have not proven harm to the health of GMO products

              Has anyone ordered these studies? And what task did you set for the "Russian experts"? And how much money was promised for a specific result? These are all important questions too.
          3. Samaritan
            Samaritan April 29 2016 10: 05
            +2
            This killed me: At the same time, America's strength as a supplier is reliability. Say, in 2010, Russia introduced an export ban due to drought, leading to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.

            Well, pi .... q here at the Americans in their heads, what’s going on!
            1. Allax
              Allax 2 May 2016 22: 26
              0
              Of course Russia! Who else can the Americans blame for the "disorder in Egypt and the Arab Spring"?
          4. Theline
            Theline 2 May 2016 23: 06
            +1
            Purgu is driven by Black, and apparently a blizzard is in your head if you think that the statement of something without the presentation of facts is considered to be true. He claimed harm.
            Someone was told from the TV that GMOs were DANGEROUS, and it started, everyone just heard about the harm of GMOs and about the story of an Israeli pregnant woman (but someone didn’t hear her either).
            And judging by the pros and cons that you adore, most people are still not far off in this matter. Look for 2014 Critical Reviews for a review of over XNUMX scientific articles on GMOs and the effects of GM foods on animals and humans. The conclusion of these articles is the harmlessness of GM foods. And GMO itself is useful in the long term, and if someone implements the introduction of infertility or blindness into a product, no one will allow this product to be sold. Because special. the commission checks the results of experiments and their effect on living organisms, and not the "evil Pentagon". I am surprised how many obscurantists claim otherwise.
        2. Asadullah
          Asadullah April 28 2016 19: 48
          +4
          Present this evidence before talking nonsense.


          Here about the evidence, very problematic. Then it is necessary to prove that any food that enters the human body affects its DNA with a restriction enzyme by incorporating food DNA. But this is not, a person eating peaches all his life, does not turn into a peach, and does not even take root. Also, it does not turn into pigs, cows and oats. That is the laws of biochemistry. Otherwise, biological life would be absurd. In principle, GMOs are the same selection, only with more subtle methods. When GMOs begin to produce offspring, most likely social fears and discontent will end. Today, these technologies are capable of feeding the planet’s population of 50 billion. An alternative is global destruction wars. No matter how we all fear and resent, these technologies are the future. Two to three generations, and it will be clear whether genomodification poses a latent threat. I am sure that no, this is how to play chess not in white and black, but in green and purple. Unusual, but get used to it.
          1. kirieeleyson
            kirieeleyson April 28 2016 21: 30
            +6
            Two to three generations, and it will be clear

            Let's experiment at home, and after a couple of generations we will see what happened))
            it's like playing chess not with white and black, but with green and purple

            Just think, a boy with a tail, this is nonsense, progress does not stand still, because
            these technologies are the future
            wink
            1. Asadullah
              Asadullah April 28 2016 22: 35
              +4
              Let's experiment at home, and after a couple of generations we will see what happened))

              Just think, a boy with a tail, this is nonsense, progress does not stand still, because


              Where is it at home? In the Tula province or what?

              About the boy with the tail, you are not the case of reincarnation of Lysenko, Trofim Denisovich? Every millisecond you are pierced by a myriad of cosmic particles that constantly shake your DNA, affecting the mysterious recombination paths, and flying on a plane, in this case, would be equivalent to eating thousands of tons of GMOs. Only this does not compare with the number of mutations. Once again, you do not eat restriction enzyme DNA, but carbohydrates, fats and proteins. Even the abundance of animal enzymes in meat does not really affect your digestion. Tobacco and alcohol kill quickly and slowly at the same time, it degenerates the nation, but try to ban, such a screech will rise. New drugs are also not tested for latent threats, but no one shouts the guard. In the end, whether you like it or not, GMOs are already in your home. All cheap whiskey, brandy and more, are made from GMO corn starch, paper, animal feed and more. All Norwegian salmon is fed with GMO products and thousands of other indirect paths. From this issue should be studied using for their own purposes.
              1. kirieeleyson
                kirieeleyson April 29 2016 11: 19
                +1
                Asadullah, I was guided by the Lithuanian flag on your profile. Of course, our debate is presented somewhat in a playful outline, because if something touched something - sorry, venerable hi
                I cannot professionally reveal the details of my attitude to GMO products as you do, since I have several, ahem, let's say, another professional direction. However, recalling the dialogue in the movie "The Matrix" about what we eat and what it looks like, I hold conservative views on the benefits of GMO products, since I see no reason not to naturally develop crops. The sad experience of farmers in India after working with Monsanta gives every reason to believe so. And about the boy with a ponytail ... you know, there is still a subtle hint in my words, sorry))
              2. Rrrj
                Rrrj April 29 2016 15: 11
                +1
                Quote: Asadullah
                Once again, you do not eat restriction enzyme DNA, but carbohydrates, fats and proteins.

                Eh - I like your comments - I even bookmarked you)) two months ago - I read your analytics ...
                Correctly say - he also somehow proved it - there is no duck ... you convince the figs.
                The main component is amino acids (in my opinion there are under a hundred in a cell) - the stomach breaks down (conditionally I say - since I don't remember exactly) cells into amino acids - and it doesn't care in general what the DNA plexus was like - with or without modification - all the same this goes for "disassembly" ... And only then the cells, in their own image and likeness, from the "disassembled" amino acids, collect other cells.
                The only problem for me in GMOs is digestibility ...
            2. Theline
              Theline 2 May 2016 23: 14
              +1
              Due to the fact that you eat pea soup, you will not turn green, at the very best, and this is a feature of digestion. What should the tail grow from?
          2. Dali
            Dali April 28 2016 23: 09
            +4
            Quote: Asadullah
            When GMOs begin to produce offspring, most likely social fears and discontent will end.

            And you can also answer:

            What-what ... experiments on rats are not enough for you ?! belay belay belay
            But rats are one of the most adaptable mammals !!!

            You need experiments on people ... here, eat yourself, and feed your children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren (but great-great-grandchildren seem to have no one to feed) ... and our children-grandchildren-great-grandchildren-great-great-grandchildren will look at the result .. . laughing

            shl
            Or maybe all the same, wait until science finally understands human DNA, otherwise they still don’t really know how and what works, and only then stuff the people with GMO shnaty?

            And all these tales about the shortage of food products are already tired of it - something in Europe with such a severe restriction of GMOs overproduction of food ... and give free rein to European farmers, they will fill up half the world now.

            And at the expense of mattress mats, everything has been clear for a long time, spend less and get more, on the one hand, a good aspiration, and on the other hand, this aspiration pours out at mattress mats into "the heat of someone else's hands" ...
            1. ty60
              ty60 April 29 2016 01: 27
              +1
              Let the mattresses be rude.
            2. Asadullah
              Asadullah April 29 2016 10: 57
              +2
              But rats are one of the most adaptable mammals !!!

              shl
              Or maybe all the same, wait until science finally understands human DNA, otherwise they still don’t really know how and what works, and only then stuff the people with GMO shnaty?


              Experiments on rats, and who conducted them? In the scientific world, recognition is quoted, which is preceded by publications in serious publications, conference proceedings and monographs. Publication in the press, yellow or the color of urine is not quoted. By the way, rats cease to breed when fed a monotonous meal. This animal is largely moody.

              Nobody drives. The fact is, we all in one form or another use GMOs. If not directly, then in a processed form. Already. The only question is whether Russia will lag behind this industry with the possibility of ultimately becoming dependent on Western corporations, or will develop scientific thought and develop a business, if not on its own, but on the foreign market. Today, biotechnology issues in Russia are at the Stone Age level. It suits you? I am not, for the number of purchases in this area is almost 100%, there is not even a tenth of a percent of it. Moreover, it is a product of a completely intellectual component, raw materials cost a penny, energy consumption is a fraction of a percent per unit. That is, Russia buys a derivative of brains. Including their former citizens who work in biotechnological industries in the West, with an average salary of 5-7 thousand green.
            3. Theline
              Theline 2 May 2016 23: 25
              0
              Tell me please, all experiments with rats on this topic led to infertility, or only carried out by one person?)
          3. Gregazov
            Gregazov April 28 2016 23: 32
            0
            Quote: Asadullah

            Here about the evidence, very problematic. Then it is necessary to prove that any food that enters the human body affects its DNA with a restriction enzyme by incorporating food DNA.

            This is not the case at all, but in related products, without which GMO technology does not make sense. Namely, the chemistry for the destruction of weeds, which accumulates in a GMO plant without much harm to it. But nothing shines good for people from this chemistry.
            1. Anglorussian
              Anglorussian April 28 2016 23: 55
              -1
              And the fact is that the gene material will penetrate into the wild through the cross-pollination of normal plants as a result of the planet's gene pool will change.
              That's not the point at all.
            2. Theline
              Theline 2 May 2016 23: 34
              0
              And how does this chemistry accumulate in a GMO plant, but does not accumulate in an ordinary plant? O_O
          4. Starover_Z
            Starover_Z April 28 2016 23: 34
            +2
            Quote: Asadullah
            But this is not, a person eating peaches all his life, does not turn into a peach, and does not even take root. Also, it does not turn into pigs, cows and oats

            I do not know. To prove the complete transformation of a person into a certain object, many years of observation are necessary.
            But on the example of the Americans, their State Department and his heralds, products with GMOs still negatively affect the psyche of anthropoids, after regular and long-term use of them. We have repeatedly discussed and laughed at the absurdities coming from the United States, whose inhabitants regularly consume GMO products:
            Since the late 1990's, virtually all of the corn and soy in the United States has been genetically modified.
          5. ty60
            ty60 April 29 2016 01: 24
            -1
            Of course, we’ll get used to it, we’ll learn how to bud, or how to propagate by grafting.
          6. VP
            VP April 29 2016 08: 14
            0
            Quote: Asadullah
            it will be clear whether genomodification poses a latent threat. Sure no

            I'm not sure yet. But I’m not sure subconsciously, objectively, there is no evidence for my insecurity.
            Perhaps so far we simply cannot find relationships. So let GMO stay for some time "in quarantine" until either confirmation is found or it is finally clear that everything is in order there.
          7. GSH-18
            GSH-18 April 29 2016 10: 31
            0
            Quote: Asadullah
            No matter how we all fear and resent, the future lies with these technologies

            These infernal technologies have one future and one purpose - the reduction of the human population on the globe.
            You are not special in biochemistry, but I studied at the Academy at one time. There is such a highly specialized direction of chemistry, called STEREOCHEMISTRY. She studies the spatial structure of organic molecules, and not the gross formula, like ordinary chemistry. So practically everything depends on stereoisomerism in biochemistry. And if you are told that, like, in the stomach, a GMO product is decomposed by enzymes to amino acids (which does not fully correspond to reality), then this still does not mean anything. The amino acids themselves can have a different gross formula (different from the natural product) and a completely different spatial structure with the standard gross formula! These are the things, my friend ... request
            These paid unscrupulous clever people engage in forgery (printing their false pseudoscientific articles), taking advantage of the incompetence of the majority of the population in this field of knowledge.
            1. VP
              VP April 29 2016 11: 10
              0
              So what ? Well, it did not decompose to amino acids, well, it jumped out through the intestines ... You will give a mechanism for changing the body’s genotype after this gene enters the stomach, the key one is precisely in its absence and not in the process of digestion.
              We have already been asked above - if someone has been eating peaches all his life, will he become a peach?
            2. goose
              goose April 29 2016 12: 31
              0
              Quote: GSH-18
              You are not special in biochemistry, but I studied at the Academy at one time. There is such a highly specialized direction of chemistry, called STEREOCHEMISTRY.

              Great answer. I will give an example in the subject - low-density cholesterol, which forms plaques, differs from ordinary cholesterol in exclusively spatial isomerism, and is almost identical in chemical properties.
          8. Theline
            Theline 2 May 2016 23: 18
            0
            GM crops are already producing offspring, just not in Russia, because they don’t sow it there. If, for example, a crop is modified for accelerated growth, then this will be a kind of blow to the agriculture of the state engaged in ordinary crops. Yes, and there seems to be no basis for creating GM seeds in the Russian Federation, so it’s easier to say again on TV that scientists have proved the danger of unnatural !!! products, but the names of scientists and their scientific work on the harm does not show.
        3. Eugene-Eugene
          Eugene-Eugene April 28 2016 19: 51
          +21
          Show this evidence before you speak nonsense.

          Apparently, Belarus loves to sow GMO wheat.

          Russia in 2010 introduced a ban on exports due to drought, which led to unrest in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring 2011.

          Well, yes, the United States has nothing to do with it. The vagaries of nature decided the fate of Mubarak.
        4. smart Fox
          smart Fox April 28 2016 20: 56
          +4
          The experiments on rats were carried out, they were fed with genetically modified corn, the fourth generation did not have offspring. For people, generations are considered after 14 years, you just have to wait. After all, all of America eats GMO products.
          1. ty60
            ty60 April 29 2016 01: 32
            0
            the conditional reference point — and the point of receipt of the result — date.
          2. VP
            VP April 29 2016 11: 12
            0
            Can you give a link to the experiments, or "read somewhere, I don't remember where"?
          3. Theline
            Theline 2 May 2016 23: 39
            0
            Before feeding these rats with corn, they must be taken. They took them. They were cancerous, and the experiment from the very beginning was carried out with a gross mistake.
        5. GSH-18
          GSH-18 April 28 2016 22: 22
          +2
          Quote: TheLine
          Wheat Wars: America loses to Russia (Bloomberg Businessweek, USA)

          The sighted one, yes he will! Not deaf, yes he hears.
          And you continue to hawk Monsanta’s ameroreklama along with its poisonous grub. Where will your family tree end. fool
        6. Blondy
          Blondy April 28 2016 22: 29
          -2
          Quote: TheLine
          "It has been proven that GMO use leads to infertility and hereditary diseases."
          Present this evidence before talking nonsense.

          Quote: sir_obs
          Well, show the opposite before driving the blizzard

          Strange, I clicked on the plus, but for some reason the minus popped up. Indeed, there is no evidence that the use of GMOs leads to infertility and hereditary diseases. At least because, getting into the stomach all the DNA and RNA is completely digested to nucleotide bases. One French opponent of GMOs, in fact, published an article that GMOs cause cancer in mice, but as it turned out later, he deliberately chose a line of mice in which the cancer was genetically programmed initially, thereby faking the results of the study. So, you should not be so frantic to minus a person on the basis of Internet myths, or memes.
          The danger is different, now, for example, there is no longer a genetically unmodified flavoring tobacco, so smokers only have memories of how aromatic were, for example, Winston and Camel forty years ago.
          1. Dali
            Dali April 28 2016 23: 43
            0
            Quote: Blondy
            Indeed, there is no evidence that the use of GMOs leads to infertility and hereditary diseases. At least because, getting into the stomach all the DNA and RNA is completely digested to nucleotide bases.

            If everything was so simple, then there would be no opponents of GMOs at all ... at first!

            And secondly, do not judge by one negligent Frenchman!

            And thirdly, that Europe treats GMOs so harshly - probably the Tolerasts still want to live ... laughing
            1. Blondy
              Blondy April 29 2016 00: 58
              +1
              Quote: Dali

              If everything was so simple, then there would be no opponents of GMOs at all ... at first!

              And secondly, do not judge by one negligent Frenchman!

              And thirdly, that Europe treats GMOs so harshly - probably the Tolerasts still want to live ...

              Well, who said that men are far from female logic?
              1. Dali
                Dali April 29 2016 10: 07
                +1
                Quote: Blondy
                Well, who said that men are far from female logic?

                And this is really an answer in the style of "I'm bloody, I don't care about everything" laughing

                Well, who is against it, eat a GMO citizen, eat ... and we’ll see something from the outside ... laughing
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. Theline
              Theline 2 May 2016 23: 45
              +1
              It is all that simple. Obscurantism and the unwillingness of the state’s agriculture to lose profits in the future by growing ordinary crops (slowly growing and capricious compared to GM crops), this is what affects the state and the media, and the media already affects your minds: 3
          2. Ros 56
            Ros 56 April 29 2016 06: 42
            0
            Quote: Blondy
            so that smokers only had memories of how aromatic the past, for example, Winston and Camel forty years ago.


            It only says that you need to quit smoking, which I did a year ago, although before that I smoked for 43 years. Oddly enough, he threw it quite easily, except for the fact that for quite a long time he himself inspired this idea.
          3. 97110
            97110 4 May 2016 12: 44
            0
            Quote: Blondy
            were, for example, Winston and Camel forty years ago.

            And "Belomor" of the Uritsky factory! Do not compare with Clara Zetkin.
        7. Dali
          Dali April 28 2016 22: 53
          +1
          Quote: TheLine
          "It has been proven that GMO use leads to infertility and hereditary diseases."
          Present this evidence before talking nonsense.

          What-what ... experiments on rats are not enough for you ?! belay belay belay
          But rats are one of the most adaptable mammals !!!

          You need experiments on people ... here, eat yourself, and feed your children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren (but great-great-grandchildren seem to have no one to feed) ... and our children-grandchildren-great-grandchildren-great-great-grandchildren will look at the result .. . laughing
        8. ty60
          ty60 April 29 2016 01: 19
          +2
          Try, sir, a competent farmer to sow the field with the grain of last year’s GMO crop. It just won’t sprout .. And hereditary diseases, experience for yourself and your relatives. We’ll exchange data in a couple of generations.
        9. DrMadfisher10
          DrMadfisher10 April 29 2016 03: 47
          0
          indeed, if we eat kartoh with genes, for example, salmon, then we will have gills that grow? But eating the same salmon with the same nothing
          1. Koronik
            Koronik April 29 2016 04: 06
            0
            "Each insertion of a foreign gene into an organism is a mutation, it can cause undesirable consequences in the genome, and what it will lead to - no one knows, and today cannot know."
      2. RUSS
        RUSS April 28 2016 21: 43
        +1
        Quote: Black
        It is proven that the use of GMOs leads to infertility and hereditary diseases ....

        Not proven.
        And do not look on the Internet for evidence of that either.
      3. slava84
        slava84 April 29 2016 00: 16
        +4
        "Kuban", but what about Rostov?)) I remember in my childhood, from 13-14 I drove a combine harvester, "wheel". Combines we still have, "Niva" were called, a condo in the form of a fan, stops working an hour after switching on)) Wheat, that's barley, yes! After a working day, I got sick like scabies, even after a shower. In general, rural life is hard, now I live in the city, lofa in comparison with the village.
        1. ty60
          ty60 April 29 2016 01: 38
          +2
          Baptism on the current of youngsters in the first season - throw barley grains in handfuls on their bare ass. Held in a year or two. Barley matures first.
          1. slava84
            slava84 April 30 2016 17: 52
            +1
            Nothing on my ass didn’t throw)) Can you consider yourself not baptized?))
            At our farm it was like this - the combine operator took his children or nephews into the steering wheel. My stepfather worked as a machine operator while I was a steering wheel. As a rule, the combiner "booze" in the forest belt, and the steering wheel worked hard.
            And I didn’t go to the current, they drove grain from the field there, to the combine / helm operator there to do a non-fig.
      4. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K April 29 2016 06: 20
        0
        This grain gives seedlings and crops, but it cannot be used as seeds - the second generation does not give seedlings - just buy again.

        Yes, you, I see, a great specialist in agriculture. Probably the entire AIF was read from cover to cover. For your information, the seeds you mentioned are called hybrids and they are not always related to GMOs. And listen to the advice of Prof. Preobrazhensky: do not read the yellow press for breakfast.
      5. Archon
        Archon April 29 2016 07: 38
        +1
        If anyone is interested, here is a good article on GMOs in the Russian magazine "Science and Life"
        http://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/3642/
        Maybe someone will help.
    2. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 19: 10
      +8
      The issue of introducing GMOs remains controversial, however, industry lobbyists are now seeking to increase federal funding for research in this area, and both farmers and scientists recognize that productivity needs to be increased.



      Oh, so the "God players" got to the wheat.
      They themselves, apparently, are not eating, and they do not feed their children.
      It’s a pity - it would be interesting to observe the results.
      Purely for the sake of science, of course :)
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 28 2016 19: 15
        +10
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        It’s a pity - it would be interesting to observe the results.
        Purely for the sake of science, of course :)

        Pah, pah, pah ... God forbid. No need for such experiments. We can somehow do without corn and soy, but without bread ...
        1. zennon
          zennon April 28 2016 22: 24
          +4
          Quote: EvgNik
          We can somehow do without corn and soy, but without bread ...

          That's right, that somehow! We have them associated with the negative. But in vain! Corn is a wonderful product. Stupid Khrushch ordered to sow it everywhere, even where it could not grow. At the same time, people simply did not know either the cultivation technology, or processing and harvesting Everything that this mda touched became shit! As for soy, this is the best thing Mother Nature has ever produced! It is a great, complete protein. Highly digestible, very nutritious. It does not contain gluten. like rye and wheat. Unfortunately soy has fallen victim to its merits. After all, it is also very cheap. As a result, it is shoved anywhere. Now the producers write, "Does not contain soy", and the consumer thinks that this is great - soy is bad ! But 5-10% of soybeans in sausage significantly improve it, saturate it with fiber. And when he sees soy in literally everything, he thinks = "Cheap poison"! This is not so! Even N.I. Vavilov, the greatest geneticist who discovered the law of homologous series, which has traveled half the world and created an exceptional collection of cultivated plants, dreamed of transferring Russia to soybeans instead of wheat! But she is thermophilic and cannot grow massively in our country. It's a pity.
          1. Dali
            Dali April 29 2016 01: 00
            +1
            Quote: zennon
            Even N.I. Vavilov, the greatest geneticist who discovered the law of homologous series, traveled half the world and created an exceptional collection of cultivated plants, dreamed of transferring Russia to soy instead of wheat! But it is not thermophilic and does not grow in mass.


            1) We would like a link to the source of the data information ...

            2) Yes, and it has long been known that just eating soybeans, which is called "it will be more expensive for myself", but it is possible only after a certain fermentation ... so with soybeans it is far from simple ...
            1. Dali
              Dali April 29 2016 01: 02
              0
              Quote: Dali
              but it is possible only after a certain fermentation ...

              By the way, you can, this does not mean useful ...
            2. Dali
              Dali April 29 2016 01: 03
              +2
              But peas, beans and lentils are both possible and beneficial!
            3. zennon
              zennon April 29 2016 18: 23
              0
              Quote: Dali
              We would like a reference to the data source of information ...

              Yes to health:
              The late academician Vavilov was a brilliant breeder. He traveled all over the world, collected the best varieties, crossed them, got new ones and traveled again, trying to find the best that could feed a huge half-frozen and half-starved country. Vavilov developed new varieties: resistant to frost and drought, high-yielding and not afraid of pests. Vavilov was an academician and possessed everything that a person living in the Land of Soviets could wish for. And this man, who devoted his whole life to growing crops, finally summing up his vast knowledge, comes to the conclusion that in the USSR it is necessary to stop sowing wheat and other cereal crops. And you need to sow soy. Soya is a "vegetable" meat with high productivity. She is able to feed the whole country and plus to this raise all animal husbandry to a new level. Such conclusions came from a man who devoted his whole life to growing cereals and who owed cereal crops everything he had: social status, government awards, academic degrees, etc., etc. Vavilov addresses his ideas for growing soybeans to to his colleagues and does not find understanding. He turns directly to Stalin and causes the "father of the peoples" the real anger. Stalin believed that people should be fed bread, and he very much loved meat. Vavilov fought with all his might, only he understood that the future belongs to soybean culture, and tried his best to explain it to those around him. As a result of all his efforts, what happened was to happen. Vavilov was declared an enemy of the people and received a long prison term. His ideas were declared wrecking. In 1943, academician Vavilov, a man who could feed the whole country with “vegetable meat”, dies of hunger in prison.

              http://www.litmir.co/br/?b=209843&p=17
      2. ty60
        ty60 April 29 2016 01: 39
        +1
        Did you dig the beds yourself? At least one tree, except for the son, has grown up?
        1. 97110
          97110 4 May 2016 12: 50
          0
          Quote: ty60
          Did you dig the beds yourself? At least one tree, except for the son, has grown up?

          A man must grow a stomach, plant a liver and build a wife. There is nothing about the tree in the manual.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 19: 12
      +1
      Russia goes to first place in the world in wheat exports. Etc. we are the first in the export of wheat, gas, oil, the fifth in steel production, one of the leaders in coal mining, pig iron smelting, and the second in the world in arms export. All this is good, but there are practically no high-tech industries from the production of competitive cars to televisions and smartphones.
      1. Sagittarius YaNAO
        Sagittarius YaNAO April 28 2016 20: 43
        0
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Russia goes to first place in the world in wheat exports. Etc. we are the first in the export of wheat, gas, oil, the fifth in steel production, one of the leaders in coal mining, pig iron smelting, and the second in the world in arms export. All this is good, but there are practically no high-tech industries from the production of competitive cars to televisions and smartphones.

        As leaders "should," some parliamentarians believe they should eat feed wheat. And a good one for sale for foreign currency, but we have no currency, so like cattle, you eat something. It is necessary to procure the FORK.
      2. sabakina
        sabakina April 28 2016 21: 37
        +5
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Russia goes to first place in the world in wheat exports. Etc. we are the first in the export of wheat, gas, oil, the fifth in steel production, one of the leaders in coal mining, pig iron smelting, and the second in the world in arms export. All this is good, but there are practically no high-tech industries from the production of competitive cars to televisions and smartphones.

        1. The car. Moshcha-150 horses. There are no normal roads, the speed is limited to 60 city, 90 out of town, a bunch of video fixers. The question is, why the heck is this herd to me? GAZ-24 in good tuning and no problem!
        2. TV. I had a "Horizon 728". The paints are amazing. Large? Yes! But! Progress is coming! And what would that "Horizon 728" look like now?
        3. Smartphone. At the time when they sent me by car somewhere (in a good sense of the word), no one called me along the way "Where are you? Why is it so long?" And about the smartphone video:
        1. ty60
          ty60 April 29 2016 01: 51
          +1
          2110 2001. Repair on the knee, diagnostics from a laptop. 900 versts for work per day is not a question. Warranty on foreign cars is serious. And why the hell are those costs for changing the oil? My hands are not dry. And not blond. Not in the gobbled up lazy states .
      3. ty60
        ty60 April 29 2016 01: 43
        0
        Look and find yourself. But then we make rockets and blocked the Yenisei! And also in the field of ballet, we are ahead of the rest!
    4. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 19: 17
      +9
      For example, Russia in 2010 introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring of 2011.



      And in the Arab Spring, Russia is now to blame ... Well, yes, the urology pandemic is marching around the world ...
    5. vlad66
      vlad66 April 28 2016 19: 48
      +13
      In 2010, Russia introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.

      Evona, as already in the "Arab Spring" Russia is to blame, the author of clearly GMO corn with his overeat. fellow
    6. starshina78
      starshina78 April 28 2016 19: 48
      +1
      First, wheat, then engineering products, then chemistry, etc. endless ! And finally, Americosia in a remote place below the back!
    7. rpek32
      rpek32 April 28 2016 20: 06
      0
      Who will tell where the statistics are taken?
      1. Kasym
        Kasym April 28 2016 20: 23
        +8
        Greek 32, so they (US experts) themselves laid it out. Last crop (2015) The United States delivered abroad a little more than 20 mil. tons, and the Russian Federation 24mil. tons
        But in the supplies of the Russian Federation, feed grain, oats, barley, and rye predominate. But there is not enough durum wheat (there is a lot of gluten there) - the Russian Federation itself is forced to import such wheat.
        Generally speaking, it is necessary to speak, especially for Ukraine, about lost profits. After all, if Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan could combine their grain pantries; then we could "regulate" the world wheat prices. In this issue, cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan is observed (the Republic of Kazakhstan competes with the United States for leadership in the supply of flour abroad). It must be said that we have tried a lot on this "front". For example, they were built in Azerbaijan, Iran, etc. "transshipment" elevators. Stocks accumulate there when transportation is favorable; and shipped to "customers" at the right time. hi
        Since last year's harvest, the PRC has opened its borders to our grain, half a mil. tons from Russia and Kazakhstan. This is a very promising market and from this year we have already been given a quota of one million tons.
      2. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets April 28 2016 20: 28
        +2
        Quote: rpek32
        Who will tell where the statistics are taken?

        I just found it on wheat.
        1. APASUS
          APASUS April 28 2016 20: 45
          0
          Quote: Vladimirets
          I just found it on wheat.

          And what are the old data for 2014?
          In relation to 2014 indicators, the growth was 138,0%.
    8. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen April 28 2016 20: 27
      +5
      In 2010, Russia introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.

      In how they turned!
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. siberalt
      siberalt April 28 2016 20: 42
      +2
      According to famous biologists, the entire world corn and soybean mass for nutrition is 90% GMOs. As for wheat, that is Ukraine. She was destined for GMO wheat.
    11. GSH-18
      GSH-18 April 28 2016 22: 19
      0
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Wheat Wars: America loses to Russia (Bloomberg Businessweek, USA)

      This is true. But why did you write it here? fool
      The ballet of the militarists cannot be defeated.
  2. Dimontius
    Dimontius April 28 2016 19: 00
    +4
    Today is not May 9th? and then the third article in a row where we beat America! laughing
    But seriously, it is gratifying of course that we are in the first place. Only at the same time, wheat prices are at historic lows, however, like all raw materials. The dollar is a bastard, spoils our whole life, and we invest in it. stop
    1. Simon
      Simon April 28 2016 19: 23
      +1
      Yes, not only the dollar, the Americans managed to slip to us with the help of our liberals, the seeds of their sugar beet and potato GMOs. Now we have problems with sugar beet and potato seeds. There are not enough seeds. They talked on TV today. In general, these liberals need to be driven out; everyone is trying to ruin and harm Russia. Fortunately, at least the seed fund of grain was preserved.
      1. vsoltan
        vsoltan April 28 2016 20: 00
        0
        Simon

        That is why you have to sell wheatgrass abroad, earn currency, so you can buy potato and beet seeds for it. ... I hope that full-fledged agriculture will be reborn in our lifetime.
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit April 28 2016 23: 17
        +1
        Previously, there were seed farms and collective farms that dealt exclusively with the seed fund. I understand, a stupid question. Where is all this now? But this is a matter of agricultural independence, and by and large the security of the state.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. fif21
      fif21 April 28 2016 20: 38
      +3
      Quote: Dimontius
      Today is not May 9th? and then the third article in a row where we beat America!
      Another piece of news: The St. Petersburg Commodity Exchange plans to sell oil for rubles! Moscow Currency Exchange expects an increase in demand for rubles. That one, that the other in the interests of the ruble, I'm in shock! Do you really understand how things should be done?
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 28 2016 21: 08
        0
        Quote: fif21
        Another piece of news: The St. Petersburg Commodity Exchange plans to sell oil for rubles!

        - this is normal "news" laughing

        Quote: http://spimex.com/about/about/
        23 September 2008 g. SPbMTSB held the first auction of diesel fuel and jet fuel in the Petroleum Products section

        Quote: fif21
        Do you really understand how things should be done?

        - understood a long time ago, there are many difficulties .. all sorts of things, and for a hedgehog rub, and inside the Russian Federation, oddly enough. Here take a look in more detail (by reference), if interested .. there are generally a lot of interesting things, including about SPIMEX, and there are many useful links:

        Quote: http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com/15961.html
        "The US State Department was unable to confirm progress in the negotiations, but highlighted US concerns," yeah. Guess from three times where the oil that Rosneft gets from Tehran will go? More precisely, where and in what currency will it be sold? Well, here is the concern, smoothly turning into hysteria

        Voooot ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. fif21
          fif21 April 28 2016 21: 27
          0
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Guess three times where the oil that Rosneft will receive from Tehran will go? More precisely, where and in what currency will it be sold?
          Shh! A military secret! Oil will go to India, where it will be refined and sold at the refinery (it has a decent share of Rosneft) for the Indian rupee, well, at least in Tugriks bullyat least in rubles.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. fif21
          fif21 April 28 2016 21: 55
          0
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          - this is normal "news"
          For export !, what is sold on it inside the Russian Federation for rubles is not news laughing
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null April 28 2016 23: 06
            +1
            Quote: fif21
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - this is normal "news"
            For export !, what is sold on it inside the Russian Federation for rubles is not news laughing

            - For more than a year now, attempts have been made to trade for export. For rubles
            - here is another quote about the difficulties this exchange is facing:

            Quote: http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com/87523.html
            For several months I haven’t gotten around to write in detail about our systemic problems in terms of launching the Russian ruble oil futures. I take off my hat in front of a group of St. Petersburg patriots from SPIMEX that promote this topic, despite the enormous resistance of the environment. One of the obstacles is that we have in oil companies (surprises!) a catastrophic shortage of specialists who could be involved in pricing on the Russian site, to be "price makers" and not "price takers". Many are accustomed to signing contracts with foreign trading companies according to the formula "average price on the ICE exchange in London for a period of X minus Y cents" and then doing nothing, receiving bonuses for drop dead effective work, while nimble traders from Vitol and others like them earn billions on our "inventory". It is clear that for this whole caste of "honored professionals with MBA" the creation of a Russian futures is like a sickle for a bonus, and not even because the CIA bought them all, but because for them it is like launching a Papuan into the stratosphere. Papuan cannot become an astronaut

            PS: What (censorship !!) slapped a minus on a purely informational comment !! While to where I (ts-ss-sss !!!) Glazyeva is slightly .. hm .. offended - nothing has arrived yet ..

            "Wonderful are your works, Lord" (c) laughing
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. fif21
              fif21 April 29 2016 06: 02
              -1
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              in terms of launching the Russian ruble oil futures. I take off my hat in front of a group of St. Petersburg patriots from SPIMEX that promote this topic,
              Well, not so disinterestedly "patriots" are promoting the topic! wassat
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              despite the colossal resistance of the environment.

              Still would. They keep the economy of the country for "Feberge"! The president himself asks them - guys share foreign exchange earnings, sell foreign exchange and other industries want to develop laughingWell, is that normal? request
              1. Bramb
                Bramb April 29 2016 06: 18
                0
                Quote: fif21
                Still would. They keep the economy of the country for "Feberge"! The president himself asks them - guys share foreign exchange earnings, sell foreign exchange and other industries want to develop Well, is this normal?

                Here you lie three times. Well, or just not in the subject, but after reading MK and other leaflets on poles.
                The argument is simple: look at taxes and excise taxes: this is not a request or even an order. They will simply pay (and pay !!!) most of the profits to the treasury.
                Teach materiel or stop lying.
                1. fif21
                  fif21 April 29 2016 07: 00
                  0
                  Quote: Bramb
                  look at taxes and excises: this is not a request or even an order. They will simply pay (and pay !!!) most of the profits to the treasury.
                  You wouldn’t pay am And the conversation is about sales efficiency, market pricing for raw materials ... The price of Russian raw materials is set by the English Exchange! (Although there is a Russian commodity raw materials) Turn on the brain, but the mat part is probably closer to you. hi
            3. fif21
              fif21 April 29 2016 06: 28
              0
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              used to sign contracts with foreign trading companies according to the formula "average price on the ICE exchange in London for a period of X minus Y cents" and then do nothing
              That's why exchanges were created! Commodity-raw and currency! Commodity companies are state-owned, there is even no law needed. An order to sell through the stock exchange is needed (state-owned companies are not interested in effective sales) I agree, you cannot demand the impossible with the Papuans good
            4. The comment was deleted.
  3. Alexander S.
    Alexander S. April 28 2016 19: 08
    +7
    For example, Russia in 2010 introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring of 2011.
    Oh wow .. how do we influence the world ... Which export would be banned in America?
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 28 2016 19: 10
      +9
      Quote: Alexander S.
      Which export ban to America?

      RD-180 and the rebellion of the astronauts will wipe this aggressive hydra off the face of the earth. smile
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 28 2016 20: 58
        +2
        Quote: Vladimirets
        RD-180 and the rebellion of astronauts will wipe this aggressive hydra off the face of the earth

        - good joke Yes

        There are about a dozen or two of these RD-180s left, it seems, "to export" .. and then the minke whales threaten to adjust their engine ..
    2. Revolver
      Revolver April 28 2016 20: 33
      0
      Quote: Alexander S.
      For example, Russia in 2010 introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring of 2011.
      Oh wow ... how do we influence the world ...
      And Obama’s speech in the hotbed of Islamism Al-Azhar has nothing to do with it.
      Quote: Alexander S.
      Which export ban to America?
      Although forbid everything, they will not notice here. "Russian" stores will replace Russian products with Ukrainian, Belarusian, Moldovan, and hell knows what other analogs, and the absolute majority of Americans have never seen Russian products, except for Stolichnaya, in their life.
      1. dmikras
        dmikras April 29 2016 07: 58
        0
        As for export and America, it was a joke
    3. fif21
      fif21 April 28 2016 20: 49
      +2
      Quote: Alexander S.
      Which export ban to America?
      Export "brains"! You study on a budgetary basis, sign a paper that you will work in the Russian Federation for 25 years, received an overseas grant - immediate expulsion.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  4. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 17
    0
    I do not like such forecasts. I, by virtue of the profession, are superstitious. When there will be a result, then we will measure our pussy ... now it’s too early for now
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 28 2016 19: 19
      +1
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      I do not like such forecasts

      Forecasts in what?
      1. Dr. Bormental
        Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 34
        0
        Predictions that we will win the "wheat war". I understand that you will now say that tsarist Russia filled up the whole world with wheat, but times have changed. Of course, it would be great to return to that practice, but I repeat - time will tell.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets April 28 2016 19: 40
          +2
          Quote: Dr. Bormental
          You’ll say now that tsarist Russia filled up the whole world with wheat

          Colleague, your insight has betrayed you, I was not going to say that. smile I was going to say that, like our beloved Americans, we also rule the laws of the market, and now the most profitable agricultural crops in the Russian Federation are just wheat and sunflower. Yes Therefore, we soared.
          1. Dr. Bormental
            Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 46
            0
            Well, God forbid! smile
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  5. Million
    Million April 28 2016 19: 19
    +5
    Well, of course! After all, Russia allowed to bake bread from feed wheat! All for sale!
    1. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov April 28 2016 19: 26
      -2
      Quote: Million
      Well, of course! After all, Russia allowed to bake bread from feed wheat! All for sale!


      If you don't like bread, buy "Breadmaker" and bake it yourself.
      1. Dr. Bormental
        Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 45
        +5
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        If you don't like bread, buy "Breadmaker" and bake it yourself.

        Bread machine for wimps !!! I recently decided to surprise my wife - to bake the bread myself in the oven. Seen enough of the videos on the net, bought flour, yeast, mind you, I did everything according to the recipe! Loaf turned out to all envy -beautiful and ruddy. After it cooled, I ate it for a week, chopping off a piece with a hammer (I soaked these pieces in the soup — even tasty). My wife did not appreciate my culinary abilities.
        P.S. there is still much flour, I will improve smile
        1. Revolver
          Revolver April 28 2016 20: 16
          +2
          Quote: Dr. Bormental
          Bread machine for wimps!

          Yesgood
          Quote: Dr. Bormental
          I ate it for a week, chopping off a piece with a hammer
          The hearth furnace is difficult; at home, you can’t stand the humidity mode at all. We bake the mold. We bought 2 forms.
          http://www.amazon.com/Norpro-Stainless-Steel-Inch-Loaf/dp/B000SSWXPO

          We use one as a lid, fasten the collar with spring clips for paper [binder clip], I don’t know how it is in Russian, there were none in the USSR.

          Knead the dough as cool as you can, otherwise it, when it rises, sticks out through the joint.
          The oven needs 90 minutes at 195º, then another 90 minutes at 160º.
          Try it this way. Good luck.
          1. Dr. Bormental
            Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 20: 24
            +1
            Thanks, I'll try))

            binder clip - and we have a paper clip. I still pull off their jeans if I ride a bicycle so that my leg does not get caught in a chain))
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. fif21
          fif21 April 28 2016 20: 57
          +3
          Quote: Dr. Bormental
          I recently decided to surprise my wife - to bake the bread myself in the oven.

          My 90 baked in the oven and bread turned good One torment, but different pens - a Russian proverb laughing I will share secrets with the permission of my wife 1. Put a cup of water in the oven (dries)
          2. The test needs time to "rise" - go for it!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Revolver
        Revolver April 28 2016 20: 04
        +4
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        If you don't like bread, buy "Breadmaker" and bake it yourself.

        Che, a conventional oven is not enough?
        We bake, by the way, from Russian rye flour. Once, about 5 years ago, they tried the Ukrainian one, it turned out to be infected with moths, so since then it has been mostly Russian. When you don’t bring it to the Russian store, you have to take the American, and you can Canadian, but it is almost twice as expensive (for a beautiful small package), and it doesn’t matter the taste.
        A loaf costs about $ 1, while you won't find any kind of edible bread for less than $ 3. But for the sake of money alone, if it were possible for these $ 3 and even $ 5 to buy what we really like, we would not get involved with the baking process. Smut, although you can endure. But the bread is exactly like the one in childhood, from the Soviet bakery, and it smells right. And most importantly, no preservatives or paint are guaranteed (the local "black" bread is actually wheat, with a minimum admixture of rye flour, and is colored either coffee or caramel paint).
      4. Million
        Million April 28 2016 20: 11
        +2
        Well, you eat forage, if you like
  6. 17085
    17085 April 28 2016 19: 26
    +3
    Russia in 2010 introduced a ban on exports due to drought, which led to unrest in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring 2011.


    Come on?!

    The apotheosis of delirium far-fetched. Starting from the first lines ...

    Our products are of the highest quality, but corn and soybean technology has advanced a lot and, in terms of earnings, wheat has become a less attractive option.


    right, why produce something from which less profit.

    by 1972, due to the shortcomings of communist government, wheat production in these regions fell so much that the Soviet Union even had to buy grain in America.


    But what about the series of previous severe droughts ???

    This industry from the very beginning did not want to introduce GMOs, fearing consumer reactions, ”explains Allen Featherstone, a specialist in agricultural economics from the University of Kansas. - Time has shown that this forces farmers to switch to other crops.


    Voo, and here is the essence of the issue, # of which it gives profit - we want to do it, but a natural product - no.
  7. 13 warrior
    13 warrior April 28 2016 19: 28
    +2
    In Russia, with its vast areas of arable land, there is no point in introducing GMOs. In the 30s and 50s, the number of people was comparable, but they did not need GMOs.
    If we take foreign experience, then in the same Israel the use of GMOs is prohibited, and productivity even in semi-desert deserts shows good. So the selection and organization of agricultural processes must be dealt with.
    What are we worse than the Jews?))
    1. Asadullah
      Asadullah April 28 2016 19: 58
      0
      What are we worse than the Jews?))


      Many, at least the fact that the owners of Monsanto are Jews. Earth's population is growing, and the time will come when global food producers will control global processes, not the oil industry with Internet providers. Without a bazaar, let there be laws prohibiting the use of GMOs in Russia, but creating and selling seeds abroad is necessary. Otherwise, again at the tail of the train, in the cargo compartment ....
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh April 28 2016 21: 35
        0
        We are developing intensively GMO grain products: there are varieties for all cases - for
        arid and wetlands, for cold and hot ..., resistant to frost on the soil
        and prolonged droughts. When bans are inevitably lifted, there will be a huge sales market.
  8. per3526
    per3526 April 28 2016 19: 37
    0
    At the same time, America's strength as a supplier is reliability. For example, Russia in 2010 imposed an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.
    -all
    1. vanavatny
      vanavatny April 28 2016 19: 47
      0
      Do not talk to Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, upset and do not tell this nonsense to anyone hi
  9. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 28 2016 19: 41
    +11
    Yo mine! Here they are, the true causes of the Arab spring have surfaced. Russia is an unreliable partner, has reduced exports. No words, the lights of logic.
    Maybe the whole thing is in beads?
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 50
      0
      Oh ... ridiculed laughing ! Maybe it's something like a rolling red banner? smile
      1. just exp
        just exp April 28 2016 21: 57
        +2
        Or maybe these aliens rule the states?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 28 2016 20: 03
      +4
      Quote: iliitch
      Maybe the whole thing is in beads?
  10. bk316
    bk316 April 28 2016 19: 42
    +3
    And today I minus someone who wrote "there is no agriculture in Russia anymore", and to me "why are you minus, everything is falling with us ...."
    So miraculously non-existent agriculture (well, absolutely nonexistent) produces wheat.
    1. Yura
      Yura April 28 2016 20: 22
      +2
      Quote: bk316
      So miraculously non-existent agriculture (well, absolutely nonexistent) produces wheat.

      Exactly, and this winter there was a moment when our suppliers and exporters dropped the price of pork in Europe and also wrote for chicken. Well, our agriculture is completely "bent", but in general the sanctions against Russia have played a positive role in this respect.
      1. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch April 28 2016 20: 40
        +2
        Quote: Jura
        sanctions against Russia played a positive role in this regard.


        The French have flocked today - they are demanding sanctions in the parliament to be lifted. It begins to come to light that the lifting of sanctions is sensitive sanctions for Russia.
        1. Yura
          Yura April 28 2016 20: 44
          +1
          Quote: iliitch
          The Frenchmen have flocked today - in parliament they demand sanctions to cancel

          Well, yes, the lower house adopted this document with 55 of the 50 votes required, let's look at what will happen next.
          1. fif21
            fif21 April 28 2016 21: 08
            +1
            Quote: Jura
            Well, yes, the lower house adopted this document with 55 of the 50 votes required, let's look at what will happen next.
            Damn it, with the Mistrals they let it down so right now and the sanctions will be canceled am No, no, she died, she died.
          2. The comment was deleted.
  11. CORNET
    CORNET April 28 2016 19: 45
    +5
    Oh, I haven’t eaten real bread for a long time ... So that I couldn’t smell (fresh bread from the store 100 meters away) and not get stale for weeks ... Squeeze it, and it takes its original form again! parents scolded him for it) We had high-class wheat (hard varieties) Italians bought it with a bang for their spaghetti! (all drooling ... ...)))) Crops were enormous military attracted to the harvest! Now all the fields are overgrown with weeds, cattle were cut (farmers fucking grabbers didn’t spoil all the land, of course.)
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 19: 54
      +1
      Not all at once, dear Cornet. We will return everything. We are a big country, slow. A rush is needed only when catching fleas ..
      1. TsShVS
        TsShVS April 28 2016 20: 25
        -5
        eat feed, Bormental, and look to the bright future!
        1. Dr. Bormental
          Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 21: 51
          +1
          It will be necessary and we will eat from our own land. Only in the future will I look MY, and not pro-Western. You are on the Komsomol in the comments, a dime a dozen. The day before yesterday they shouted - all the money was stolen, the rocket does not take off, today you yell - Putin stayed, everyone was choked up with fear, the rocket took off ... what? Do not eat, do not finish?
          1. Million
            Million April 29 2016 08: 09
            +3
            Well, eat shit. Who forbids you. And we would like to eat normal bread, our own, Russian. And we don’t really need the West, the West needs Russia more!
        2. Dr. Bormental
          Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 21: 51
          -3
          It will be necessary and we will eat from our own land. Only in the future will I look MY, and not pro-Western. You are on the Komsomol in the comments, a dime a dozen. The day before yesterday they shouted - all the money was stolen, the rocket does not take off, today you yell - Putin stayed, everyone was choked up with fear, the rocket took off ... what? Do not eat, do not finish?
          1. Sgt.
            Sgt. April 29 2016 09: 03
            +3
            Unfortunately, so far it turns out that we’re eating shit and are looking west. Every schoolchild and every old woman knows the dollar, euro and barrel prices of oil.
            I think that Russians deserve a better life!
            Well, you personally can eat poop
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. bk316
      bk316 April 28 2016 20: 43
      +2
      Quote: CORNET
      x I haven’t eaten real bread for a long time

      Yeah...
      It’s hard to find such bread in Moscow.
      However, in Europe you can’t find him at all, a solid baguette - in 3 days you can play baseball with them.
      I’m definitely going to the cottage in Ostashkov to stop by the store - I’m still there.
    4. Revolver
      Revolver April 28 2016 20: 52
      +2
      Quote: CORNET
      Oh, I haven’t eaten real bread for a long time.

      Bake yourself. As they say in America, if you want something done right, do it yourself (if you want it done right, do it yourself).
  12. trantor
    trantor April 28 2016 19: 51
    +3
    Say, in 2010, Russia introduced an export ban due to drought, leading to riots in Egypt and spawning the Arab spring 2011 year.

    "Have I ruined the chapel too?" (Caucasian captive)
    In, damn it, a storyteller. But, it seems, for the sake of this phrase, the whole article was written.
  13. Evgeny Khokhlov
    Evgeny Khokhlov April 28 2016 19: 52
    +2
    It's good of course that we are in 1st place! But for some reason the peasant did not become richer from this!
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 20: 04
      +1
      Peasants (farmers today) are quite fisted people. The wife has a colleague at work whose father is a farmer. His farm is somewhere in the suburbs. Well, this colleague is pushing daddy's products to colleagues, so to speak. Well, we took 3 pounds of pork neck (frozen) price -350r. per kilo. The meat is good, there is no word, but in the nearest supermarket at the sale (Lenta), the pork neck was no worse than in 190.
      1. satellite24
        satellite24 April 28 2016 20: 24
        +5
        350 r it hurts! It remains to find out where that pig came from for 190 and how it was pricked, so that it grows faster (so that it was possible to sell it cheaper wink )
        1. Dr. Bormental
          Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 20: 32
          0
          Quote: satelit24
          It remains to find out where that pig came from in 190, and how it was pricked, so that it grows faster

          Yes, that's about it. You do not know what is better, what is worse ... as in that rhyme:
          How can I believe people ?,
          I surrendered to him by the moon
          And he took my girl’s breasts,
          And knotted on his back ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Bramb
        Bramb April 29 2016 05: 02
        +3
        I have a friend vet.
        He raised pigs. They got 3 months for him for 100 kg! Those. what an ordinary pig gained in 6-7 months is twice as fast. He pricked them.
        I will not go into details, just a fact: he himself did not eat them and did not sell them in his village, although they asked more than once. Drove for sale to the neighboring area. Then they put him in prison. Did not help. Now under investigation again.
        And the pigs are rosy and cheaper, and the meat also tastes nothing. You eat-eat!
      3. 97110
        97110 4 May 2016 13: 16
        0
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        on sale (Tape) no worse than a pork neck in 190 was no worse.

        So is it any worse? For 190? ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. TsShVS
      TsShVS April 28 2016 20: 27
      0
      we are also leaders in oil and gas. Only a certain circle of people gets rich from this, and not the country
      1. Dr. Bormental
        Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 20: 38
        +4
        Well tryndezh begins ... look, maybe at least a little pride in the flag that you have raised on your avatar hi
        1. Dr. Bormental
          Dr. Bormental April 28 2016 20: 48
          0
          Excuse me, belolentochniki, I’ve been baking on you from the bell tower. fellow
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    4. 97110
      97110 4 May 2016 13: 15
      0
      Quote: Evgeny Khokhlov
      But for some reason the peasant did not become richer from this!

      And according to Marx. He receives the cost of production and reproduction of labor. And surplus value is received by those who become richer. This is the peasants have long noticed. Folk wisdom is money for money.
  14. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 28 2016 20: 16
    0
    If Nature has taken the side of Russia, then this speaks on whose side the truth ...
  15. _my opinion
    _my opinion April 28 2016 20: 27
    0
    Wheat Wars: America loses to Russia (Bloomberg Businessweek, USA)

    and here they are fighting ...
  16. satellite24
    satellite24 April 28 2016 20: 37
    0
    As far as I remember, even during the struggle of the drunk pin-dos-dash, the bossy squad made us (when distributing some raw material quotas) we made a grain exchange, that is, wheat is being traded through us! - (I think it would be difficult - for example, to be in 10th place)
  17. fa2998
    fa2998 April 28 2016 20: 41
    +1
    Quote: RUSOIVAN

    RUSOIVAN
    (1)

    Today, 19: 00

    ↓ New


    And also in the field of ballet we are ahead of the whole planet!

    Let’s sort it out! Grain is also a raw material, a person doesn’t consume so much, and even in the form of cereals and bakery products. THE BASIC GRAIN goes to compound feeds. And animals are raised. It’s better not to get a herd of several million heads of cattle and pigs. And feed with NORMAL food (without any stimulants, and other chemicals) And now abroad, part of our wheat will go to feed, and will come back to us in the form of meat. For the states, especially not to worry, they already export a sea of ​​non-primary products, we mainly oil, gas and now grain. hi
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. fif21
      fif21 April 28 2016 21: 16
      0
      Quote: fa2998
      we mainly have oil, gas and now grain.
      Moscow was not built in a day.
  18. Horst78
    Horst78 April 28 2016 21: 08
    0
    The attractiveness of wheat for American farmers has declined, as this revolution was not affected by the two revolutions that pushed corn and soybeans forward - biotechnological and biofuel.
    Themselves let this "half food" crack.
    Since the late 1990's, virtually all of the corn and soy in the United States has been genetically modified.
    .
    Wheat can also be genetically modified. However, consumers do not want their staple foods - such as bread - to be made from genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    .
    For example, Russia in 2010 introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring of 2011.
    here the arrows have translated "radishes" fool negative
  19. Roman 11
    Roman 11 April 28 2016 21: 44
    +1
    At the same time, America's strength as a supplier is reliability. For example, Russia in 2010 imposed an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.

    Doesn’t there be drought in the USA?

    And the knowledge of politics he has to go nuts wassat It turns out velvet revolutions due to the drought in Russia laughing
  20. aybulat
    aybulat April 28 2016 22: 06
    +2
    Oh how. Russia's ban on grain exports led to the Arab spring. Not surprisingly, even a Western audience perceives their media as stupid propaganda.
  21. iouris
    iouris April 28 2016 22: 09
    -2
    Again: "we caught up with America ..." The US territory is located south of Kiev. We have three lean years for one productive year. All food programs have repeatedly failed "successfully". It turns out that we eat fodder grain, but what do they feed livestock and poultry?
  22. aleksandroff
    aleksandroff April 28 2016 22: 31
    +2
    Quote: Nagan
    Although forbid everything, they will not notice here. "Russian" stores will replace Russian products with Ukrainian, Belarusian, Moldovan, and hell knows what other analogs, and the absolute majority of Americans have never seen Russian products, except for Stolichnaya, in their life.

    You teach materiel. Boeing on our titanium. If we do not supply palladium, all Western technology will be very bad. South Africa alone will not cope with palladium. I think about palladium. You don’t know why this question is being kept silent. Now they start cutting diamonds with us themselves. By the way, it is a very big deception that Russia lives only on hydrocarbons. High technology is also being replaced a lot. By the way, why the heck do we make tablets and smartphones when China is. Many countries live richly without worrying about computers. Amer’s missiles would have ceased to fly without us long ago. By the way, the group of Glonass satellites is more than Amer’s, and even on Porsche they began to put glonass. Soon, the Amer navigator is moved, well, there is much more. By the way, earlier, 1,5-2 years ago, hydrocarbons occupied 51% of the budget, and now 39%. True path we go comrades! America is not the same for a long time. They ring you like ukrov great. Moreover, the furry northern animal will come to you. wassat laughing tongue
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 29 2016 11: 29
      0
      Quote: aleksandroff
      Moreover, the furry northern animal will come to you.

      So this beast is our most valuable treasure laughing
      Do you know why?
      All the ladies from Australia to Canada prefer this .... well, the fur of the "Arctic fox" of the Chukchi - it seems so far the best quality fur .... while in the sense there is no big warming, otherwise it will go away
  23. acetophenone
    acetophenone April 28 2016 22: 33
    0
    GMO srach is one of the most popular on the Internet. good
  24. mik6403
    mik6403 April 28 2016 23: 22
    0
    After reading the article, I was very happy for the Russian millionaires and billionaires ..... but I saw from what flour bread is baked at large bakeries and what ingredients are poured there - a sight not for the faint of heart !!! I bought a bread machine myself and if I buy it I buy it from small producers. As for ordinary farmers or peasants, they inject from dawns and dawns and are financially at the level of the plinth ....
  25. Forever so
    Forever so April 28 2016 23: 51
    -3
    Moscow, April 19th. In Russia, a special government commission will be created to deal with the development of agriculture. This was announced by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, speaking in the lower house of the Russian parliament with a report on the work of the government.
    Medvedev said that the authorities cannot but take into account the importance of the industry for the country. Therefore, she needs to pay special attention. The prime minister emphasized that the primary task is to maintain a high pace of agricultural development.
    To solve it, he decided to create a "large" government commission to address the development of the agro-industrial complex. Medvedev stressed that he himself will head the new body.

    Ahead of America ??)) Well, well.
  26. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 April 28 2016 23: 54
    0
    Quote: Asadullah
    When GMOs begin to produce offspring, most likely social fears and discontent will end. Today, these technologies are what can feed the world's population of 50 billion.

    A m. to send funds to ennoble the planet Earth? Deserts occupy a considerable space on which practically nothing grows, but could feed the population. And feeding people GMO products is a dangerous experiment until the safety of such products is proved. To do this, a lot of time is needed, which contradicts the basic law of capitalism - profit here and now, and then descendants should rake all these problems in the future, if they can still be reproduced. angry
  27. Papapg
    Papapg April 28 2016 23: 58
    0
    We are the very first, the most, we have a lot of everything, but why all around? Why is the gas pipe running outside my garden, but I have no gas, so that I have to buy it "from an airplane wing"? Why do those who immediately resell land plots get it? Bastard Reagan said that Russia is an evil empire, maybe he's right?
  28. lurk
    lurk April 29 2016 00: 34
    +1

    Ermakova the most honest approach to the problem of GMOs
  29. gg.na
    gg.na April 29 2016 03: 30
    0
    And in general, we will soon abandon the stinky dollar bully Russia has come close to realizing the “dream of a decade” - trading oil on its own platform and abandoning the American dollar in payments for it. This was reported by Bloomberg with reference to the head of the St. Petersburg Commodity Exchange Alexei Rybnikov.http: //www.ntv.ru/novosti/1625203/
    1. Bramb
      Bramb April 29 2016 05: 13
      0
      No need to write nonsense.
      Neither we nor the rest of the world will give up the dollar in the near future.
      An alternative to the dollar is being built: a different banking system.
      An alternative, not a replacement !!!
  30. Bramb
    Bramb April 29 2016 04: 30
    -1
    Quote: RUSS
    The negative effect on human health from the consumption of GMO products has not been proved by the results of the initial monitoring of Rospotrebnadzor.

    )))))
    Such things are not done on the basis of primary monitoring, and not even on the basis of secondary and other monitoring, but through clinical trials.
    There is clearly a suppression of the situation and a departure from the answer, which is objectionable to GMO producers.
    If you do not understand this, then why are you showing your stupidity and ignorance? And if you understand, then you are a liar or engaged ... well, that very creature.
    Facts: GMOs are unable to reproduce. Genes are changed. This means that the molecules of GMO organisms are embedded in the human body due to the classical basis, but behave due to other functional groups in a completely different way. This does not even have to be proved. This is an axiom. Therefore, it is necessary to prove the safety of GMO organisms, and not vice versa! Or do you personally try an unknown new substance yourself personally on the tooth? Try cyanidic new metal? )))
    The conclusions are obvious.
  31. Nitarius
    Nitarius April 29 2016 05: 25
    +2
    GMOs let them eat their own!
  32. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 29 2016 05: 32
    0
    Well, that is, we do not need to buy wheat abroad, right?
    And the bread may not be so expensive.
    And you can also try to recapture the market from Ukraine.
    And what about GMOs ... it can in itself and not be scary,
    but in the mixture with the rest of the chemistry that pours and pours into us,
    it can be harmful.
    1. Bramb
      Bramb April 29 2016 05: 51
      +2
      Quote: Zomanus
      And what about GMOs ... it can in itself and not be scary,

      Have children, grow up, educate them, put them on their feet - and then eat GMOs as much as you like, even with buckets at breakfast!
      But not before !!!
  33. Max repp
    Max repp April 29 2016 05: 46
    0
    In 2010, Russia introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the 2011 Arab Spring.
    - What kind of things are they trying to do with us all that we have pushed to shift?
  34. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 April 29 2016 06: 16
    +3
    It is unclear why the author lied about the poor communist leadership and allegedly because of this the purchase of grain in the United States?
    In fact, the USSR exported much more grain than Tsarist Russia, not only to Europe, but to Asia and Africa.
    And the purchase of grain to Gorbachev was scanty and bought cheap feed grain.
    Grain imports in the USSR:
    1960 year - 0,2 mln tons (0,2% of domestic consumption)
    1970 year - 2,2 mln tons (1,2% of domestic consumption)
    1980 year - 27,8 mln tons (14% of domestic consumption)
    In 1985, out of 44,2 million tons of grain imports to the USSR, wheat accounted for 21,4 million tons (44%), corn - 18,6 million tons (42%), barley - 3,7 million tons (8%). [4]
  35. Rust0626
    Rust0626 April 29 2016 06: 21
    0
    Quote: Bramb
    Quote: RUSS
    The negative effect on human health from the consumption of GMO products has not been proved by the results of the initial monitoring of Rospotrebnadzor.

    )))))
    Such things are not done on the basis of primary monitoring, and not even on the basis of secondary and other monitoring, but through clinical trials.
    The conclusions are obvious.


    Allow me to insert my 5 cents, without regard to Google
    I studied at school in the USSR and may have lagged behind new trends in science
    We were taught that in the stomach all food is broken down into amino acids, of which 20 amino acids, the human body absorbs, the rest is excreted.
    So what difference does it make of which genes this or that organism is made of if it is nevertheless split into amino acids.
    Or was biology taught to us incorrectly?
    1. Bramb
      Bramb April 29 2016 06: 34
      +1
      I'm there.))
      Well, this is school knowledge. It gave only a general idea of ​​the processes.
      Not all food is split and not always the same. Otherwise: why do some pills need to be drunk before meals, and others after? It is due to the fact that the processes there are many times more complicated than what is written in the textbook. Therefore: not all and not only amino acids.
      The general idea is correct, but in real life something like that written in the textbook almost never happens. This is often used by unscrupulous "educators" of GMOs.
  36. gnv731
    gnv731 April 29 2016 07: 47
    +1
    To ensure food safety, the production of about 1 ton of grain per person is required. We are 150 million, therefore, a crop of 140-150 million tons is required. This is enough to ensure the seed industry, livestock and, directly, the milling industry. Currently, a crop of 90 million tons is considered good. Of this crop, 15-25 million tons are sold, with a balance of 65-75 million tons. This picture indicates that we have very poorly developed livestock.

    Until the 90s of the last century, in our area, cattle was an order of magnitude larger than now. And a significant part of agricultural products was processed directly in the area, filling the budget, jobs, and population growth. I think that in the whole country in rural areas a similar picture was observed.

    Now the situation has changed dramatically. Such conditions are created for the rural population that a significant part moves to cities. Local production has virtually disappeared as a class. As a result, we have large holdings producing low-quality food products, overpopulation of cities and mass import of products.

    On large meat farms, livestock grows on chemistry. After slaughter, the carcass of the animal continues to grow. The quality of such meat and milk is low. Anyone interested can read the book by E. Schlosser "Fast Food Nation", where he describes in detail the meat production in the USA. Most likely, we have a similar situation at large holdings. The same picture with milk. In order to increase the volume and fat content of milk, cows are stuffed with chemistry, then the milk is "bodied" at the dairy, adding palm oil and milk powder, again imported. As a result, the customer receives a chemical cocktail in a bag labeled milk. Eating such foods sharply increases the incidence of allergies, obesity, and other diseases.

    A similar situation is observed with vegetables and fruits. Beautiful apples sold in the store do not spoil for months. This means there are so many preservatives in them that they do not roam.

    This current situation is no less dangerous than the use of GMOs.

    Another concern is the fact that we have abolished the control over the quality of bread. As a result, unscrupulous producers use feed grain contaminated with weed seeds for flour.

    The use of GMO grain in our country, in principle, does not make sense. GMOs are beneficial to modern businessmen: "I worked on the land on a" rotational basis ", squeezed out the maximum and left with" honestly "acquired, and there the grass will not grow."
    At present, a huge number of arable land is empty, most farmers, with the exception of farms from the fertile south of Russia, use low-quality seeds for crops, a minimum of fertilizers and poisons. With the elimination of these shortcomings, the size of the crop will increase significantly.

    But, unfortunately, one of the main problems is that our village is "bled out". For about 30 years, able-bodied people and financial resources have been "washed out" from the village. As a result, the cities are overpopulated, which creates significant problems with employment, ecology, etc. If, during industrialization, the rural population was employed in factories and there was an increase in industrial output, now the picture is different. There is no industrial growth, and the number of able-bodied people employed in the production of real products is small. Most of them work in the service sector, in the public sector, not producing real products, but consuming them. The result is a strong bias towards consumption. Moreover, consumption is due to the exchange of resource rent for food and consumer goods.
    1. Shurik70
      Shurik70 April 29 2016 22: 50
      +1
      Quote: gnv731
      To ensure food safety, the production of about 1 ton of grain per person is required.


      So that "grain" in general.
      And we are only talking about wheat.
      She needs less, about three times.
      http://p-d-m.livejournal.com/43146.html
      60-70 million tons of wheat per year were enough for the entire USSR
  37. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK April 29 2016 08: 42
    +1
    Russian economy torn to shreds (Obama) wink
  38. vvp2412
    vvp2412 April 29 2016 12: 40
    +1
    For example, Russia in 2010 introduced an export ban due to drought, which led to riots in Egypt and spawned the Arab Spring of 2011.

    Not sickly pulled a donkey by the ears!
  39. Shurik70
    Shurik70 April 29 2016 22: 43
    +1
    [by 1972, due to the shortcomings of the communist government, wheat production in these regions fell so much that the Soviet Union even had to buy grain in America]

    Again the distortion of facts.
    Wheat is much more profitable to grow in the south.
    That is, in the US, wheat is CHEAPER at a cost (not in dollars, but in labor hours, fertilizers, etc.).
    For Russia, it’s more profitable to buy part of the wheat. Not all, of course, so as not to become addicted (otherwise they will threaten hunger, and what, should agriculture be raised from scratch?). But it’s profitable to buy a part.
    And the date is a complete lie.
    The USSR bought grain constantly; in the 72nd, wheat imports were generally lower than in previous or subsequent years.
    Here is the schedule:
    http://p-d-m.livejournal.com/43146.html
    And under Gorbachev, a CIA agent, they just started cutting down gardens, and wheat imports were reduced almost to zero, and for the first time they became less than exports (which also declined). So this is an indicator!
    Gorbachev would not act for the good of the USSR.
    It is beneficial for Russia to import a small part of wheat, rather than export it abroad.
  40. Jon
    Jon 2 May 2016 08: 22
    +1
    Agricultural security is national security
    Glad you began to change your attitude towards her
  41. Calter
    Calter 9 May 2016 12: 37
    0
    Quote: GSH-18
    Quote: Asadullah
    No matter how we all fear and resent, the future lies with these technologies

    These infernal technologies have one future and one purpose - the reduction of the human population on the globe.
    You are not special in biochemistry, but I studied at the Academy at one time. There is such a highly specialized direction of chemistry, called STEREOCHEMISTRY. She studies the spatial structure of organic molecules, and not the gross formula, like ordinary chemistry. So practically everything depends on stereoisomerism in biochemistry. And if you are told that, like, in the stomach, a GMO product is decomposed by enzymes to amino acids (which does not fully correspond to reality), then this still does not mean anything. The amino acids themselves can have a different gross formula (different from the natural product) and a completely different spatial structure with the standard gross formula! These are the things, my friend ... request

    What the hell did I just read ?!
    First question: how does genetic material affect the STRUCTURE of amino acids ?! DNA provides dashing information about their ORDER in a polypeptide sequence. Of course, protein synthesis systems are also encoded in DNA .... but to change the amino acid, you need to tweak:
    - ribosomal RNA
    - enzymatic synthesis system
    - introduce a new transport RNA
    - regulatory systems, including epigenetic, knowledge of which in modern science is in its infancy
    - make sure the viability of the resulting organism, because the new amino acid will be incorporated into all polypeptides, i.e. approximately 1/20 of the entire proteome will be replaced by unknown crap, which will lead to the inactivation of hundreds or even thousands of very different enzymes.
    The amino acids themselves may have a different gross formula (different from the natur product)

    Captain Evidence suggests that if, for example, proline has a different gross formula, then it will not be proline at all. And before delivering such an amino acid to the stomachs of consumers - citizens of a "hostile state" - it is necessary to breed a plant that with such an amino acid will live much longer than a pair of zygote divisions in embryogenesis.