Military Review

"Admiral Essen" completed tests in the grounds of the Northern Fleet

50
The frigate “Admiral Essen”, built for the Russian Navy at the Yantar shipyard, entered the Baltic Sea after completing state tests in the offshore testing grounds of the Northern Fleet, reports RIA News Message from the representative of the company Sergey Mikhailov.




“One of these days, the ship should already come to the factory to begin an audit and preparation for the transfer. Now "Admiral Essen" in the sea range is completed work with the aircraft, then return to the base and then to us. The transfer to the customer is scheduled for the last decade of May ",
said the representative of "Amber".

He recalled that the “state tests of Admiral Essen, the second patrol ship of Project 11356, began on January 30, 2016, the first stage of the tests passed in the Baltic test sites fleet". In early April, the frigate went to the Northern Fleet to test weapons systems.

The ship was laid in July 2011 g, launched in November 2014-th.

Help edition: “The patrol ships of the 11356 project are intended for combat operations against surface ships and submarines, to repel attacks of air attack weapons, both independently and as part of formations. They have universal missile and artillery weapons and modern radio equipment for anti-submarine and air defense. The ships of this series have a displacement of about 4 thousand tons, the length of 125 meters, the speed of 30 nodes and the crew of 180 people. "
Photos used:
PSZ "Yantao"
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn April 27 2016 19: 08
    +7
    Apparently, together with Grigorovich, they will go to Sevastopol in the summer good
    1. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog April 27 2016 19: 21
      +3
      7 feet under the keel !!! Thanks to the shipbuilders for their work!
    2. RUS96
      RUS96 April 27 2016 19: 31
      +14
      It is expected that in the near future the remains of Alexander Prokhorenko, who died in Palmyra, will be delivered to the capital.
      The Syrian Kurdistan representative office in Moscow confirmed information that negotiations between Kurds and ISIS militants * on the transfer of the body of a Russian special forces officer Alexander Prokhorenko were successful. The remains of the fighter have already been transferred to the Russian side.

      In the near future, the body of Alexander Prokhorenko will be delivered to Moscow.

      Earlier, the French edition of RT reported that the body of Alexander Prokhorenko was discovered and is located in the Kurds, without giving any details of the operation. Subsequently, Life became aware of the details of the negotiations between extremists and Kurds. According to a source at the representative office of the Syrian Kurdistan in Moscow, instead of the murdered Alexander Prokhorenko, the militants demanded that the Kurds release three like-minded prisoners. However, whether this condition was met as a result, the source did not specify.
      https://life.ru/t/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/404389/v_priedstavi
      tielstvie_siriiskogho_kurdistana_v_moskvie_zaiavili_chto_tielo_russkogho_rembo_p
      ieriedano_rossiiskoi_storonie
      1. APASUS
        APASUS April 27 2016 20: 43
        +7
        Quote: RUS96
        It is expected that in the near future the remains of Alexander Prokhorenko, who died in Palmyra, will be delivered to the capital.

        The guy honestly deserved to be buried as a Hero in his homeland.
    3. sub307
      sub307 April 27 2016 21: 41
      +3
      Stirbjorn "Apparently, together with Grigorovich, they will go to Sevastopol in the summer"
      The Black Sea Fleet should receive a total of three frigates of Project 11356. The third ship - "Admiral Makarov" - is planned to be handed over to the Navy in the summer. (Http://vz.ru/news/2016/3/23/801170.html) So it is possible not "two", but "three" ....
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. Winnie76
    Winnie76 April 27 2016 19: 13
    0
    By the way, what about the paid turbines? It seems ours were going to file for arbitration ...
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer April 27 2016 19: 18
    +5
    launch a series in 20 ships .... the fleet is most needed in updating. If the underwater is already updated then the surface is still a sore subject. I hope this is the first swallows wink
    1. Lt. Air Force stock
      Lt. Air Force stock April 27 2016 19: 59
      0
      Quote: Magic Archer
      launch a series in 20 ships .... the fleet is most needed in updating. If the underwater is already updated then the surface is still a sore subject. I hope this is the first swallows

      A total of 6 such ships are planned to be built for the Black Sea Fleet.
      1. huntsman650
        huntsman650 April 27 2016 21: 42
        -4
        There will not be six, unfortunately there are no engines, the remaining cases will be sawn. Engines plan to buy in China. In the fleets, the old ships become engines on the SF 1 running BOD remained.
        1. 73bor
          73bor April 28 2016 00: 07
          0
          In China, they plan to buy diesel for corvettes, and for frigates they will build it in Rybinsk, and it seems that they are not going to cut the hulls, they just put it off for a year!
    2. 11 black
      11 black April 27 2016 20: 01
      0
      Quote: Magic Archer
      launch a series in 20 ships .... the fleet is most needed in updating. If the underwater is already being updated, then the surface is still a sore subject. I hope this is the first wink swallows

      The first thing to do is to upgrade the airborne forces, strategic missile forces and ground forces, the fleet is not as important to us as they are. For two hares ...
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 27 2016 20: 27
        +1
        Quote: 11 black
        The first thing to do is to upgrade the airborne forces, strategic missile forces and ground forces, the fleet is not as important to us as they are. For two hares ...

        The United States has about 60 submarines, 60 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 11 aircraft carriers, you need to have enough ships and submarines to track enemy ships and submarines. Ohio, it is advisable to graze and monitor them so that in the event of a war the sunken submarine is not allowed to launch missiles. Multipurpose submarines located in the Barents Sea also need surveillance. Yes, and in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, the enemy’s submarines are probably hanging around.
        1. max702
          max702 April 27 2016 21: 32
          +2
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          The United States has about 60 submarines, 60 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 11 aircraft carriers, you need to have enough ships and submarines to track enemy ships and submarines

          So what? If there is a need to sink the US fleet, this means the end of civilization on planet earth ..
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          Ohio, it is advisable to graze and monitor them so that in the event of a war the sunken submarine is not allowed to launch missiles

          And this is already a fantasy .. Alas, but in order to fulfill this plan you have to be twice the USSR and that is not a fact .. And a tenth of what the US fleet can launch is enough for everyone ..
          The US fleet is needed to control colonies around the world, we do not have such a task. Our task is not to win the naval battle, but to cause unacceptable damage to the United States and comrades so that they do not have a desire to start a war against us. The main defense of the fleet is not missiles and guns, but the flag of our state, which hints that in case of aggression towards the ship an adequate answer will be given .. Although other means. Well, for anti-piracy actions and what is being built enough, it’s better to really rearm those who are really fighting, and this is, first of all, infantry and aviation .. What we are actually observing, here we will put things in order on land, we’ll give you greedy little hands then navy think ..
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit April 27 2016 22: 04
            0
            Aggression, a flag, an adequate response, that's all clear. Everyone has already forgotten, and can someone tell me what happened to the Kursk? Will we ever know the truth or not?
            1. Dart2027
              Dart2027 April 27 2016 23: 06
              +2
              Quote: Orionvit
              Can someone tell me what happened to the Kursk? Will we ever know the truth or not?

              Why do you need to know? Those who are supposed to know, and the rest "There is much sorrow in much wisdom." It doesn't sound very nice, but politics has always grind individual people, and nothing can be done about it.
            2. lelikas
              lelikas April 27 2016 23: 27
              -1
              Quote: Orionvit
              Will we ever find out the truth or not?

              You will not know anything but the official version, i.e. by definition - the truth, you have already been told. You have to put up with this.
            3. 73bor
              73bor April 28 2016 00: 08
              +1
              Maybe you don't need to look for a "black cat in a dark room"!
              1. lelikas
                lelikas April 28 2016 12: 26
                0
                Quote: 73bor
                Maybe you don't need to look for a "black cat in a dark room"!

                Yeah, but you can’t solve the crime, and with the hooligans in biblical way ...
            4. max702
              max702 April 28 2016 08: 46
              0
              Quote: Orionvit
              Will we ever find out the truth or not?

              and think? Well, our "Kursk" mattresses have sunk and what to do? what options? The first is to press the buttons and the whole world to dust .. The second is to try to destroy the adversary, namely the direct executor (which was what the entire northern fleet was doing for several hours then), and if it would not be possible to put forward claims to the opposite side demanding compensation .. Which again and it happened (they wrote off debts and gave a loan). So the GDP squeezed the maximum out of this situation, that the combat capability of the fleet at that time was awful .. This was taken into account and by further events we see that the conclusions have been drawn and the work is underway.
          2. Ride78
            Ride78 April 27 2016 22: 45
            0
            Do not overdo it. If you remove the core, as we have it, then the tomahawks in the amount of 7000 pieces will not be enough for Russia in any way. If I remember correctly, they threw about 700 to Yugoslavia.
          3. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock April 27 2016 23: 11
            0
            Quote: max702
            And this is already a fantasy .. Alas, but in order to fulfill this plan you have to be twice the USSR and that is not a fact .. And a tenth of what the US fleet can launch is enough for everyone ..

            I read somewhere that the 2nd US submarine is constantly on duty in the Barents Sea in order to monitor our strategic submarines at the time they went on combat patrols in the ocean (in addition, Putin said that Ohio submarines were detected in the Barents Sea, he said on one of straight lines). So if you graze directly from the base, then I would say a high chance, there would be a sufficient number of multi-purpose submarines, this is already in the ocean where it’s quite difficult to detect millions of square kilometers of the water surface, but there is a chance at the base.
            The United States has only 12 Ohio battleworthies with 2 Tridents (the 2nd is constantly under repair), at the same time 6-7 submarines are on combat patrol, given that the United States has only two strategic submarine bases, on the Pacific coast and on the Atlantic coast, it’s not so and many multipurpose submarines are needed for surveillance.
          4. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock April 27 2016 23: 16
            0
            Quote: max702
            So what? If there is a need to sink the US fleet, this means the end of civilization on planet earth ..

            Yes, do not drown the fleet, but at least give battle to one Arly Burke or Ticonderoge, if necessary (as a rule, single ships hang out in the Barents Sea and the Black Sea). But for example, on Arly Berke there are 74 anti-aircraft missiles, the question is how much anti-ship missiles need to be launched so that there is a 100% guarantee of at least the ship’s failure and maximum drowning?
            In Soviet times, it was estimated that in order to guarantee the destruction of AUGs, 75-100 anti-ship missiles must be launched at the same time, only in this case there is a high chance of overcoming the Aegis defense of a group of ships.
            Can we, if necessary, launch as many RCCs simultaneously?
            1. KCA
              KCA April 29 2016 07: 38
              0
              it will completely destroy the AUG, together with guarding ships and transports, one anti-ship missile will be enough for an aircraft carrier, no missile defense will give a 100% guarantee of a missile’s defeat, a 1% chance will be enough to cut the pelvis in half, and who guarantees exactly 1%, or 0,1 % or 0,01% chance does not play in a particular case of an attack? a rocket worth 1 lyam to break an aircraft carrier worth hundreds of lard, good arithmetic
          5. lelikas
            lelikas April 27 2016 23: 28
            0
            Quote: max702
            And this is fantasy ..

            This is not a fantasy, but the real work of submariners and anti-submariners.
        2. Ride78
          Ride78 April 27 2016 22: 40
          0
          What does it mean in case of something to sink)) And they will wait)) In any case, if the war begins, the maximum that our fleet will be able to bear 10-15% of NATO’s fleet, and that will be a good achievement.
      2. Tusv
        Tusv April 27 2016 22: 09
        0
        Quote: 11 black
        The first thing to do is to upgrade the airborne forces, strategic missile forces and ground forces, the fleet is not as important to us as they are. For two hares.

        Where it is thin and torn. Alone, the aerospace forces cannot cope with the American global strike. Withstand 65 thousand, and sag from 75
        Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
        The United States has about 60 submarines, 60 destroyers, 22 cruisers and 11 aircraft carriers, you need to have enough ships and submarines to track enemy ships and submarines.

        That's right. Without the development of fleets, the chances of repelling a global attack are minimal.
        1. max702
          max702 April 28 2016 08: 55
          0
          Quote: Tusv
          Where it is thin and torn. Alone, the aerospace forces cannot cope with the American global strike. Withstand 65 thousand, and sag from 75

          C'mon, analysts calculated breakthrough ONE! missiles "Satan" zeroes 80% of the American industrial potential .. And in the event of a conflict, more than one will obviously fly .. Everyone somehow forgot what nuclear weapons are, by and large we do not need to launch anything; enough to detonate the warheads at home and that's enough for everyone! Only we will die right away and without suffering, but the rest will be envious of the dead .. One devil, no one will survive, it's only in Hollywood films they climb out of the bunker 20 years later, and they have the sun around the sea and grace .. In real life there will be something similar to " Letters from a dead person "and that way for a couple of tens of millennia, if not always ...
    3. KaPToC
      KaPToC April 27 2016 20: 19
      0
      That's right, about twenty, and preferably fifty ships in a series, ships of the Gorshkov type.
    4. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris April 27 2016 20: 58
      0
      Most likely there will not be a series .. As long as they do the domestic gas turbine engines, more advanced ships will be on the line. As far as I understood from the press, this project was originally exported, other frigates were destined for the Russian fleet. Most likely, the shipbuilders will finish building four patrol vessels for our fleet.
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 27 2016 21: 03
        0
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Most likely there will not be a series .. As long as they do the domestic gas turbine engines, more advanced ships will be on the line. As far as I understood from the press, this project was originally exported, other frigates were destined for the Russian fleet. Most likely, the shipbuilders will finish building four patrol vessels for our fleet.

        Admiral Grigorovich in the ranks, Admiral Essen completed sea trials, Admiral Makarov mooring trials are underway, Admiral Butakov launched, etc. 6 Ships for the Black Sea Fleet are under construction.
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сторожевые_корабли_проекта_11356
        1. alexmach
          alexmach April 27 2016 21: 29
          +1
          Admiral Butakov launched


          Yeah ... without a power plant, which is not and never will be
        2. proud
          proud April 27 2016 21: 43
          0
          Of these, only three will actually be operational.
    5. ametist415
      ametist415 April 27 2016 21: 01
      +4
      launch a series in 20 ships .... the fleet is most needed in updating. If the underwater is already being updated, then the surface is still a sore subject. I hope this is the first wink swallows

      Only this project has become obsolete as Lada Grant. The United States understands this, few people even think about it. If there are smart people, then this series will be small. Better than pr. 22350, but we can barely pull new technologies and build it for 10 years.
      1. Dimon19661
        Dimon19661 April 28 2016 01: 41
        +1
        The project is completely outdated, take a look at the add-ons, I saw this 25-30 years ago (((
    6. proud
      proud April 27 2016 21: 41
      0
      And where do we get the engines? And most importantly, when?
    7. silver_roman
      silver_roman April 28 2016 10: 15
      0
      Quote: Magic Archer
      ships 20

      Such a large series is not needed exactly 11356. It is necessary to bring to mind 20350. Here is a series of such ships in pieces of 20-30 would be welcome.
  4. goblin xnumx
    goblin xnumx April 27 2016 19: 37
    +1
    here would be the destroyers of the fleet ...
  5. Thirteenth
    Thirteenth April 27 2016 19: 46
    +7
    In my youth I reread the book "Port Arthur" five times. Actually from it I learned about the commander of the cruiser "Novik", and then the battleship "Sevastopol" N.O. Essen. Judging by his description in this book, he was a heroic man. It is not for nothing that the ships are named after him. soldier

    1. alexmach
      alexmach April 27 2016 20: 10
      +2
      The book is good but biased. Generals polls traitors soldiers - the salt of the earth. Guo Essen book exclusively praised
      1. Thirteenth
        Thirteenth April 27 2016 20: 53
        0
        Quote: alexmach
        The book is good but biased. Generals polls traitors



        Nothing like this. Generals Kondratenko and Bely, Admiral Makarov, are described on the positive side.
      2. Roman 11
        Roman 11 April 27 2016 21: 01
        +1
        Quote: alexmach
        Generals polls traitors soldiers - the salt of the earth.

        Did Kondratenko get dirty? He is a legend. But on the betrayal of Stessel and Fock I agree. Read, where is the heroic commandant of the fortress at the forts crawling? In the chronicle, I saw only how he was going to capitulate ... And why did Fok at Qingzhou admire how our 1st regiment, the 2nd Japanese divisions ironed, and even henna? Questions there are growing in an avalanche .....
        1. alexmach
          alexmach April 27 2016 21: 36
          +3
          Everything is debatable there. The fate of Port Arthur was actually a foregone conclusion. The Japanese threatened the massacre (I can’t guarantee that if the city is taken by storm, the massacre will be avoided) and the city had civilians, families of officers.

          Kuropatkin, from the very beginning, was going to surrender Port Arthur and play the "Scythian war" by gathering forces, retreating and stretching communications.

          Kondratenko was not smeared, yes, White was not smeared, the main character was not smeared, the book was not bad at all, I read it twice - in childhood and relatively recently.
  6. egor1712
    egor1712 April 27 2016 20: 02
    +4
    The American destroyer Zamvolt is undergoing tests and is a symbol of the progress of the American army, which is forced to maintain its authority and remain on the cutting edge of the arms race by any means. The Russian response to this threat will be lowered by 2023 and will be presented by project 23560 "Leader". Both projects use the most advanced developments, so most of their data will be kept secret for more than a year, but their well-known characteristics must be compared. Moreover, the first conclusions can be drawn now.
    Based on the available information, the Leader project will continue the tradition of modern Russian developers to create universal platforms. So, project 23560 will become the basis for two types of destroyers at once - with nuclear and non-nuclear power plants. Obviously, the first option will come out more expensive, but the autonomy of new vessels will increase significantly, in the second case, the vessel will be cheaper and crew training will be greatly simplified.
    Zamwolt will not work out with such a versatile vessel, since its main feature was the designers chose stealth, which required maximum changes in appearance, even to the detriment of seaworthiness. It is for the sake of stealth technologies that Zamvolt got its nose of an unusual shape, and the keel turned out to be almost flat. Naturally, the stability of the ship was a big question. In addition, the situation was aggravated by a huge superstructure and sides inclined inward.

    A vessel of this design could easily just roll over in the presence of strong sea waves. To solve this problem, it was decided to significantly simplify the add-in, therefore, under the cool phrase “composite materials”, ordinary wood is covered with a 3-mm layer of carbon. This helped to resolve the issue with the stability of the ship, but the ship of the XNUMXst century does not provide any special protection to the crew from bullets and shells laughing
  7. Lester7777
    Lester7777 April 27 2016 20: 13
    0
    Beautiful ship!
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. R-22
    R-22 April 27 2016 21: 48
    +2
    Engines are needed and turbines, again boiler building must be developed, stagnation is also here
  10. poma
    poma April 27 2016 22: 07
    +1
    We need ships.
  11. Galleon
    Galleon April 28 2016 00: 43
    +3
    But I’m thinking about something else: I wish I could go to sea in such a way, to master the CCP - not with a passenger or ballast, but with a benefit ... It’s on a 956pr destroyer itself. served, I wonder what is now on the new ship?
  12. Sars
    Sars April 28 2016 04: 51
    +1
    In the north, climate-sensitive ships need to be built: ice class, insulated, with heating of all equipment, with increased displacement, etc.
  13. Fgrt
    Fgrt 1 May 2016 04: 12
    0
    I wonder what kind of mover his "sistership" will be equipped with