Military Review

Mass media: Instrument design bureau develops a missile system on the Armata platform

57
JSC "Design Bureau of Instrument Engineering" in collaboration with the designers of the Armata combat platform began to develop a missile complex designed to destroy enemy armored vehicles, reports Look with reference to the resource "Military informant."




“The new missile system, located on the tracked chassis of the Armata combat vehicle, will combine the capabilities of an operational-tactical complex, a volley fire system, and an anti-tank complex. A universal launcher with surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles will be placed on the chassis base in special transport-combat containers ”,
writes a resource with reference to its source.

According to the source, “the prospective rocket system will include an armored launcher and a vehicle with a guidance and reconnaissance system on the battlefield.”

He noted that "a fundamentally new missile system will be able to interact with all modern weapons and receive intelligence information from air observation systems, ground reconnaissance systems and other combat complexes on the battlefield."

According to the resource, “a missile system based on the Armata platform is designed to destroy single and group targets, including tanks", engineering and fortifications, surface targets and low-speed aircraft at ranges up to 145 km."

The source also said that the "mobile ammunition of the new missile system will be of the order of 20 ready-to-launch missiles for various purposes."
Photos used:
http://military-informant.com
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock April 26 2016 12: 30
    +15
    Most likely ATGM Hermes will be placed at the base of Almaty.
    1. Forest
      Forest April 26 2016 12: 39
      +4
      Didn’t they cover him already? There is no news on it for several years.
      1. cniza
        cniza April 26 2016 12: 48
        +14
        According to the resource, "a missile system based on the Armata platform is designed to destroy single and group targets, including tanks, engineering and fortifications, surface targets and low-speed aircraft at ranges up to 145 km."



        Serious characteristics, the US and the West will scratch turnips.
        1. Vita vko
          Vita vko April 26 2016 14: 30
          +4
          Quote: cniza
          will scratch turnips

          and not only. Because it is simply impossible to push back KP, warehouses, communication centers, areas of concentration at a distance of more than 100 km and will lead to guerrilla warfare methods. Westerners have to learn from Bandera to hide in forests and basements.
        2. Oleg16661
          Oleg16661 April 26 2016 16: 46
          +3
          To be honest, the first thought that came to my mind after reading this news is - what the hell is this for?
          Let’s now transfer all the equipment to the platform of Almaty. We’ll also put police on UAZ vehicles made on the same platform. Why should they break off? PAK FA are not going to put on the same platform?
          It seems that offering to transfer something to the Armata platform has become a fashion trend among developers.
          Firstly, there is already a technique specially developed for these tasks. There are new modifications to it. The tactics of its application have already been developed.
          Secondly, the platform of Almaty is not a cheap toy. In our country, and in the best of times, there would not be enough money for that, and now ...
          Thirdly, the platform is new, promising, but not yet tested as it should. And I’m sure it will be further developed. Yes, in the future, after extensive testing and improvements, various equipment can be gradually transferred to this platform, but now such news is perceived as premature.
          Of course, this is just my opinion and it "may not coincide with the opinion of the editorial board." smile
          1. bovig
            bovig April 26 2016 18: 26
            +1
            Quote: Oleg16661
            To be honest, the first thought that came to my mind after reading this news is - what the hell is this for?
            Let’s now transfer all the equipment to the platform of Almaty. We’ll also put police on UAZ vehicles made on the same platform. Why should they break off? PAK FA are not going to put on the same platform?
            It seems that offering to transfer something to the Armata platform has become a fashion trend among developers.
            Firstly, there is already a technique specially developed for these tasks. There are new modifications to it. The tactics of its application have already been developed.
            Secondly, the platform of Almaty is not a cheap toy. In our country, and in the best of times, there would not be enough money for that, and now ...
            Thirdly, the platform is new, promising, but not yet tested as it should. And I’m sure it will be further developed. Yes, in the future, after extensive testing and improvements, various equipment can be gradually transferred to this platform, but now such news is perceived as premature.
            Of course, this is just my opinion and it "may not coincide with the opinion of the editorial board." smile

            Firstly, mass production (and only this option) reduces the cost of any new development. Secondly, the practical use of the product helps to identify design flaws and areas of modernization.
            And it's time to put the safety of the crew at the forefront - even a missile system striking at a distance of more than a hundred kilometers is not fully protected from sabotage groups ...
        3. cherkas.oe
          cherkas.oe April 26 2016 17: 37
          0
          Quote: cniza
          low-speed aircraft at ranges up to 145 km. "

          Most likely a typo, a comma before the number 5 forgot to put.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov April 26 2016 17: 45
            0
            Why? Some kind of "Hermes-S" advanced.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 26 2016 12: 51
        +6
        Quote: Forest
        Didn’t they cover him already? There is no news on it for several years.

        Recently there was news about a boat with a Hermes-K complex (version for the Navy), which means the project exists.
        http://topwar.ru/94126-proekt-raketnogo-kompleksa-germes-k.html
      4. just exp
        just exp April 26 2016 12: 56
        +4
        silence on zircon is also several years. and then oops - tests.
        Threat I would like to know what's with Morpheus. stalled, or work is going on. the idea itself is not bad. 3.14ndos do the same.
      5. pilot8878
        pilot8878 April 26 2016 17: 03
        0
        Quote: Forest
        There is no news on it for several years.

        Or maybe that's why there is no news that "Hermes" was not covered?
    2. Pavel Tsybai
      Pavel Tsybai April 26 2016 12: 51
      +2
      If such are placed on Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, the Japanese will stop even dreaming of "northern lands". Not a joke range of 145 km.
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 26 2016 12: 55
        0
        Quote: Pavel Tsybay
        If such are placed on Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, the Japanese will stop even dreaming of "northern lands". Not a joke range of 145 km.

        This complex is still more against drones and ground equipment. The Kuril Islands do not have a land border with Japan, so the danger there may come from the Navy and the Japanese Air Force, therefore, coastal missile systems Bastion and Ball, air defense systems S-400,350, Shell-C1, and anti-submarine aircraft are needed (Japan has many non-nuclear submarines) .
        1. Monos
          Monos April 26 2016 13: 41
          +6
          The Kuril Islands do not have a land border with Japan, so the danger there may come from the Navy and the Japanese Air Force, therefore, coastal missile systems Bastion and Ball, air defense systems C-400,350, Shell-C1, and anti-submarine aircraft are needed (Japan has many non-nuclear submarines) .



          From Kunashir to Hokkaido 16 km. hi
          1. sanja.grw
            sanja.grw April 26 2016 14: 15
            +2
            From Kunashir to Hokkaido 16 km.

            So the Ainu live there, their what
            1. Monos
              Monos April 26 2016 19: 24
              +4
              Oh, where are they, these Ainu? It has long been exterminated and assimilated by the Japanese.
    3. Wild_grey_wolf
      Wild_grey_wolf April 26 2016 12: 51
      +4
      As far as I understand, this is a continuation of the Terminators' ideas only not for urban combat, but in a large theater of operations, once there are surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles? so it turns out. ... ... correct if something is wrong.
      1. just exp
        just exp April 26 2016 12: 58
        +2
        then not a terminator. but chrysanthemums.
      2. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 26 2016 12: 59
        +1
        Quote: Wild_Grey_Wolf
        As far as I understand, this is a continuation of the Terminators' ideas only not for urban combat, but in a large theater of operations, once there are surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles? so it turns out. ... ... correct if something is wrong.

        Israel has an ATGM Spike NLOS, and the United States also developed a similar complex called NLOS, but the project was closed.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 26 2016 16: 34
          0
          The U.S. is now another project ahead - the universal MML launcher
      3. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA April 26 2016 13: 33
        +4
        Quote: Wild_Grey_Wolf
        As far as I understand, this is a continuation of the Terminators' ideas only not for urban combat, but in a large theater of operations, once there are surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles? so it turns out. ... ... correct if something is wrong.

        Apparently, ours decided to make an ultra-long-range ATGM / light CD on a tank chassis, such as the Israeli "Per". smile

        The only question is how to carry out the missile defense at a range of 145 km? And why does this complex have an armored chassis - with such a firing range?
        1. Izotovp
          Izotovp April 26 2016 15: 37
          0
          External target designation plus, possibly, its own drone in one of the containers.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA April 26 2016 15: 50
            +1
            Quote: Izotovp
            External target designation plus, possibly, its own drone in one of the containers.

            145 km? Then it is only against the baboons.
            For a more or less normal army dangling in the deep rear (100-120 km), a foreign drone will either hit or crush its communication channel.
            1. Izotovp
              Izotovp April 26 2016 16: 09
              0
              Then the satellite and the "command and control operators" remain.
    4. just exp
      just exp April 26 2016 12: 55
      +1
      Hermes had 2 ground options, and one of them with a range of up to 100 km. and was something like a spike nlos.
      here the range of 145 km is much higher.
      so either Hermes has some good progress. or RK will be different.
    5. Ride78
      Ride78 April 26 2016 14: 05
      +1
      But I imagined a complex with vertical launching shafts. It would be cool as a counterbalance to Chrysanthemum. You can call it beautifully - Orchid. Pieces of 30 pturov and bumblebees can be supplied, only of course they need a "fire and forget" system.
      1. Izotovp
        Izotovp April 26 2016 15: 38
        +1
        Launchers for such missiles are too long to carry them vertically.
    6. kugelblitz
      kugelblitz April 26 2016 14: 40
      +3
      Gurkhan has another variation with Solntsepek.

    7. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 26 2016 16: 03
      +1
      Something this development is a universal launcher for SAM, MLRS and ATGM, looks like an American that is already being tested.
  2. sanja.grw
    sanja.grw April 26 2016 12: 36
    +11
    We become some notorious
  3. Kent0001
    Kent0001 April 26 2016 12: 39
    +2
    Fine. The idea is not new, get a strong armored car near the edge, so we are waiting for a good implementation of the idea. Good luck to the designers !!!
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 April 26 2016 16: 19
      0
      Quote: Kent0001
      Fine. The idea is not new, get a strong armored car near the edge, so we are waiting for a good implementation of the idea. Good luck to the designers !!!

      Where did you see the cutting edge 145 km deep?
  4. Wedmak
    Wedmak April 26 2016 12: 52
    +3
    This seems to be called cram the unsuitable. It will be interesting to see a) how different missiles for different purposes are inserted into one machine, respectively, with different dimensions and masses, b) how and by what means will all this pickle be aimed at the target? And what will TZM look like?
    1. just exp
      just exp April 26 2016 12: 59
      +1
      OTR and ATRA can be combined. spike nlos as an example of an idea. but use them as a MLRS.
      Well, either money to hell or automation works so fast that it manages to direct the entire package of missiles at once.
  5. 31rus2
    31rus2 April 26 2016 12: 56
    +1
    Dear, this concept was popular both in our country and in the West back in the late 80s, but could not be implemented, although the individual components were at the final stage, they are impressive, let's look at the tests and the finished sample, if everything is as it is written , then this is a serious application for the emergence and development of all the tactics of modern combat
  6. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 26 2016 12: 56
    +1
    The West once again creeps in a chair ... And great! Good luck.
  7. pascal309
    pascal309 April 26 2016 12: 57
    +1
    It seems Hermes will bet. Only he had such char-ki. There was a version of Hermes both on ground targets, in the form of multiple launch rocket, and on equipment (tanks, infantry fighting vehicles) and on air targets. All the same, they brought it to mind. Very happy, and how much suffering was on this project.
    There are no analogues in the world. !!!
  8. magician
    magician April 26 2016 12: 58
    +1
    Well done Tula! the machine should go super! for a modern platform, a powerful and modern weapon!
  9. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 April 26 2016 12: 58
    +3
    Straight as a universal fighter on the Armata platform ... good luck to the developers and designers ... and I wish the military to get a very effective weapon
  10. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 26 2016 13: 25
    +1
    According to the source, “the prospective rocket system will include an armored launcher and a vehicle with a guidance and reconnaissance system on the battlefield.”

    Again, the State Department and the Pentagonist validol must be brought up. Do not have time to move away from previous "worries" because of our weapons! laughing And then another zrada! fellow
  11. vnord
    vnord April 26 2016 13: 28
    +1
    The project is interesting. Technically possible. But everything rests on reconnaissance and guidance systems and, as a result, results in a price. It will be easier to build specialized machines. Though ......?
  12. kirieeleyson
    kirieeleyson April 26 2016 13: 31
    +1
    Concerning "Hermes":
    “New types of autonomous GOS, for example, radar or infrared type with thermal guidance, are under development,” Selkin noted.

    There is such a practice that "unpickable" is just squeezed into the project after 10 years of puzzling persistent work, apparently this is the same, this complex is not in the near future. Recently, a whole bunch of projects have been covered, but how much R&D is still going on on projects about which nothing is known.
  13. bad
    bad April 26 2016 13: 40
    +1
    .... hmm .. what if such a racket is more useful for "Hurricane" or "Tornado" or "Tornado"? .. repeatsorry that expensive damn .. recourseand then a volley shot and a 200 km enemy tank platoon into dust .. laughing
  14. mlad
    mlad April 26 2016 13: 49
    +2
    if the range is more than 100 km, then this is not a melee vehicle and there is no need to create it on the basis of Almaty, you can even use a wheeled chassis, but for close combat it’s time to create something like a javelin
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 26 2016 14: 03
      +1
      Quote: mlad
      if the range is more than 100 km, then this is not a melee vehicle and there is no need to create it on the basis of Almaty, you can even use a wheeled chassis, but for close combat it’s time to create something like a javelin

      Better something like Spike NLOS.
      And then while such a fool with "javelins" leaves, while the GOS captures the target - there is a chance to get a crowbar or godfather. And if you work from cover, then the chassis is too large for this.
  15. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 26 2016 13: 51
    +2
    I do not know what they will put there, but the range is amazing, here are our "partners" such as Banderlog, Pshek and Tribalts, and even more distant ones will rejoice.
  16. Pacifist
    Pacifist April 26 2016 14: 02
    +2
    up to 145 km? !! belay
  17. Leto
    Leto April 26 2016 14: 31
    +2
    As I understand it, the launch range of the proposed missiles will clearly exceed 5 km. If so, then why make it on the basis of Almaty? Why powerful armor if you have to work not at the forefront?
    1. Cananecat
      Cananecat April 26 2016 15: 42
      +1
      As far as I understand, they will work near the "front end" for explored targets in the depths, which means that an attack on the equipment from the enemy is possible. Here then the question arises about the ability of technology to resist the attack of various means of destruction from the enemy.
  18. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander April 26 2016 15: 36
    0
    I don’t understand why such a powerful reservation for the missile system as for the “Armata”? He will act in any case NOT ON THE FORWARD EDGE of the attack! There he has nothing to do with missiles with a range of 145 km! It looks like a wave has gone to hang anything on this platform.
  19. engineer74
    engineer74 April 26 2016 16: 10
    0
    An interesting thing will be! good With such a chassis, everything can be used - from the carriage of "Cornets" to "Iskander", it remains to unify the TPK and control! wink Good luck to the designers!
  20. nrex
    nrex April 26 2016 16: 18
    +1
    Quote: Former Combat
    I don’t understand why such a powerful reservation for the missile system as for the “Armata”? He will act in any case NOT ON THE FORWARD EDGE of the attack! There he has nothing to do with missiles with a range of 145 km! It looks like a wave has gone to hang anything on this platform.


    Now the concept of platform unification. The widespread use of platforms of the same type reduces the cost of production and unifies spare parts, and also ensures the interchangeability of units in the "field", when the question arises of collecting one living from two "wounded" ones. This is a cool concept, very pragmatic and tuned to the survivability of the rolling stock.
  21. Winnie76
    Winnie76 April 26 2016 19: 39
    0
    But it seems to me that this is another journalistic nonsense. 14,5 km range in the end it is something like Chrysanthemum or Cornet
  22. Clueless
    Clueless April 26 2016 20: 32
    +1
    Quote: Oleg16661
    To be honest, the first thought that came to my mind after reading this news is - what the hell is this for?


    Exactly, why do our soldiers need a highly armored platform, let them die in cardboard MTBL and other conveyors.
  23. Alex777
    Alex777 April 26 2016 21: 28
    0
    Quote: Leto
    As I understand it, the launch range of the proposed missiles will clearly exceed 5 km. If so, then why make it on the basis of Almaty? Why powerful armor if you have to work not at the forefront?


    To act in the orders of the advancing troops to suppress the firing points in the depths of the enemy defense. All kinds of OTR, self-propelled guns, MRLS, etc.
  24. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe April 26 2016 21: 55
    +1
    Quote: cherkas.oe
    Most likely a typo, a comma before the number 5 forgot to put.

    What kind of snot did it deliver, without thinking that a missile with a range of 145 km should be in dimensions equal to the S-300 missile, and where will it fit in the new complex? I'm not saying Chemon at such a range will be detected and induced.