Military Review

Tehran to sue in international court against Washington

32
Tehran prepared a lawsuit against the United States, which will be sent to an international court, reports RIA News a message from the representative of the International Law Center of the Iranian President’s Administration Mohammad Jahrami.


Tehran to sue in international court against Washington


It is about returning $ 2 billion to Iran, which Washington has frozen. The money should go to the relatives of American soldiers who died as a result of the terrorist attack on 1983 in Lebanon. The government of Iran called this decision “theft”.

“Compensation for the terrorist attack of which Iran is accused of organizing is demanded by more than a thousand Americans. The barracks with peacekeepers stationed in Beirut were attacked on October 23 1983. Then the American soldier 241 died. A total of more than three hundred peacekeepers who performed the UN mission during the civil war in Lebanon became the victims of the attack ", - reminds agency.

In January, the United States Department of State 1984 added Iran to the "list of state sponsors of terrorism."
Photos used:
bodobia.sellfile.ir
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vend
    Vend April 26 2016 09: 48
    +8
    That's right, we need such processes. And preferably public.
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 April 26 2016 09: 53
      +25
      Is Iran's participation in the terrorist attack in Lebanon officially proven? Not.
      And the money is frozen.
      americosia in all its glory. No rules.
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K April 26 2016 10: 00
        +26
        And the Americans are not going to prove anything, they have a different goal - not to give what they got into their hands and what they considered "theirs" ...
        "Gopota" at the state level ...
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain April 26 2016 10: 04
          +17
          Quote: Andrey K
          "Gopota" at the state level ...

          That's right.
          1. Talgat
            Talgat April 26 2016 18: 25
            +2
            But we must pay tribute to the Iranians - their position is respected

            Almost alone confronted world aggressors. And they finally waited until Russia recovered and began to abandon external management. And China is becoming the new center of opposition to the world Fed dictates.

            In conditions of complete isolation and sanctions, they did not bow before the "RULERS OF THE WORLD"
            Interestingly, they are not inferior to the same Turkey (its geopolitical adversary - the same as the Saudis) in terms of GDP - although Turkey was in a favorable regime

            Now, when sanctions are weakening, when Russia turned to face its natural allies (Syria and Iran), when China becomes an alternative center of power, when Iran created land communications with Eurasia via Kazakhstan-Iran railway and became a strategic partner not only for us but for all CSTO - Iran has the best prospects

            It’s too late to bomb Iran - it looks like Iran got what it wanted - stability and protection from aggression
      2. Pirogov
        Pirogov April 26 2016 12: 00
        +2
        Quote: Michael67
        Is Iran's participation in the terrorist attack in Lebanon officially proven? Not.
        And the money is frozen.
        americosia in all its glory. No rules.

        The rules and truth for America and its slaves are one, for others only a punishment.
      3. bovig
        bovig April 26 2016 18: 34
        +2
        Quote: Michael67
        Is Iran's participation in the terrorist attack in Lebanon officially proven? Not.
        And the money is frozen.
        americosia in all its glory. No rules.

        There is one rule in americosia: if you find a reason, or an "explanation" (even if it is stupid and unsubstantiated), it means legal and justified! Cynical arrogance - that's the rule!
    2. CORNET
      CORNET April 26 2016 09: 56
      +24
      That's what they can do with us ... The Yankees will freeze our assets and there is no stabilization fund! This is a robbery in broad daylight ... Shakalya is the nature of the West in all its glory Select, rob, bomb! The court is of course a necessary thing, but useless and most importantly a good lesson to other countries ...
      1. DMB_95
        DMB_95 April 26 2016 10: 20
        +12
        It is pointless to sue the staff in the "international court". And why our assets are still held in their "securities" is a very interesting question. It was asked publicly many times, and there was never an intelligible answer.
      2. Rostov Papa
        Rostov Papa April 26 2016 10: 22
        +4
        It’s interesting, but how is Germany’s gold reserve doing there, have the Americans already returned it? Will give like China, gold plated tungsten ingots?
      3. max702
        max702 April 26 2016 11: 01
        0
        Quote: CORNET
        That's what they can do with us ... The Yankees will freeze our assets and there is no stabilization fund!

        But in order to prevent this from happening, it is necessary to directly declare that in the event of the seizure of our funds in the USA and satellites, a thermonuclear strike will be inflicted by all available means ... At the same time, it is clear to say that we perfectly understand the consequences and are aware of the complete death of civilization on planet Earth .. For this, let's live by the rules and not change them for the sake of one or another person ..
        1. kotvov
          kotvov April 26 2016 11: 14
          +3
          struck a thermonuclear blow by all available means ... ,,
          To do this, you must be Stalin.
          1. midashko
            midashko April 26 2016 11: 47
            +3
            To do this, you must be a moron!

            But to keep the stabilization fund in the United States, you must be either an idiot or a traitor.
      4. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky April 26 2016 11: 58
        0
        Quote: CORNET
        The court is of course a necessary matter, but useless and most importantly a good lesson to other countries ...

        Why is it useless?
        Even if the outcome of the process is unfavorable for Iran, this will give the world community grounds to once again make sure that the "concern" about international law declared by the mattresses is just a fiction, and that this very "international law" works exclusively in the interests of the strong against the weak. And this, in turn, will play in favor of the variant of a multipolar world order, against the "hegemon."
        1. svd-xnumx
          svd-xnumx April 26 2016 19: 52
          0
          Why is it useless?
          Even if the outcome of the process is unfavorable for Iran, this will give the world community grounds to once again make sure that the "concern" about international law declared by the mattresses is just a fiction, and that this very "international law" works exclusively in the interests of the strong against the weak. And this, in turn, will play in favor of the variant of a multipolar world order, against the "hegemon."
          Mattresses do not recognize international courts; they have the supremacy of their legislation.
      5. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 April 26 2016 18: 59
        -1
        Quote: CORNET
        . The Yankees are freezing our assets and there’s no stabilization fund!

        In this case, why do our financiers continue to push our money into American papers and continue to be in Putin's favor? Is this not stupidity on the part of our financial tycoons? Or is it a direct betrayal of the homeland?
    3. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 26 2016 10: 01
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      such processes are needed. And preferably public.

      Well, they will award money to Iran (which I doubt very much), the Americans, as always, will make their faces with bricks and don’t give anything back, that’s all.
      1. Vend
        Vend April 26 2016 10: 26
        +1
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Wend
        such processes are needed. And preferably public.

        Well, they will award money to Iran (which I doubt very much), the Americans, as always, will make their faces with bricks and don’t give anything back, that’s all.

        Nobody believed in the Russia-Yukos process either. However, Russia won the trial. It is important here not how much to win, how much to disgrace.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets April 26 2016 11: 02
          +1
          Quote: Wend
          However, Russia won the trial.

          This is not a gain so far, but a respite, only the powers of the court considering the case were disputed, and not the fact itself.
        2. DMoroz
          DMoroz April 26 2016 11: 11
          0
          Russia-Yukos is still a lawsuit between the state against the company, and not lawsuits at the level of 2 states
        3. The comment was deleted.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 26 2016 09: 50
    +2
    It is a question of returning to Iran $ 2 billion, which Washington froze.

    Do not see them this money, however!
  3. Samen
    Samen April 26 2016 09: 51
    +1
    With striped bandits, you need to do something ... And lawsuits, the same is an option!
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 26 2016 10: 00
    +3
    Oh really? So directly and return! A hegemon is a hegemon for itself, which establishes rules for itself ... And it decides when to follow it, and when not.
  5. PKK
    PKK April 26 2016 10: 10
    +1
    Interestingly, a pocket court will award.
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. April 26 2016 10: 22
      0
      Quote: PKK
      Interestingly, a pocket court will award.

      in fact, in 2007 after six years of proceedings district federal court
      dc
      appointed Hezbollah and, accordingly, Iran. And he gave families the right to demand the seizure of Iran’s property abroad and compensation. Iran denied any involvement and never in 6 years sent its representative to the court. Having escaped from sanctions, the Persians decided to play this old story. We'll see, although it’s hard to believe.
  6. Sly
    Sly April 26 2016 10: 21
    +2
    Well, here you can’t call it anything else like theft
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 26 2016 10: 27
    +9
    And he’ll do it right, the United States must also be included in the list of countries sponsoring terrorism, and this will not be an exaggeration.
  8. ram_design
    ram_design April 26 2016 10: 27
    +1
    This is Iran’s contribution to the US economy - for lifting the sanctions. But in fact - outright robbery.
  9. made13
    made13 April 26 2016 10: 50
    +4
    If the rules of the game do not suit the gentleman, he changes the rules. The USA does not bear the burden of a white man, like Great Britain. They have replaced skin color with a lifestyle, now they bear the burden of DEMOCRACY on the backward peoples of the rest of the world.
    1. Weyland
      Weyland April 26 2016 13: 08
      +1
      ChSH, the original of this picture is impudent too stole - right from the exhibition!
      Country of traditions (thieves) - and gentlemen (by the way, the English commander also gave those captured sepoys depicted in the picture gentleman's wordthat will save them life)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. user3970
    user3970 April 26 2016 11: 37
    +2
    Well, a bomb is not a bomb ... Oh, if Stalin was at the helm, and not a servant of Chubais ... In Russia, there is something to "squeeze" from the sworn capitalists ... "Sakhalin", "Sakhalin-2", Rosneft, Gazprom, aero and seaports ... It's probably easier to say that it belongs to Russia.
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 26 2016 12: 06
    +1
    Iranian government called this decision "Theft".

    This is not theft - this is robbery (open theft), and cynical. At the expense of Iranian money they want to pay off their schools of ghouls.
  12. Obolensky
    Obolensky April 26 2016 12: 17
    0
    Interesting. And the consequences are interesting. It is clear that the international court against Washington is likely to remain silent and "wash their hands." But the precedent itself is interesting.

    And yes, here's what else I liked:

    In January 1984, the US State Department listed Iran on the "list of sponsoring states of terrorism." - It was necessary first of all to add this office to yourself.

    PS Previously, countries fought with each other. Because of what just did not fight. And now the times have hardly changed. Not only fighting, but also suing! Here we live.
  13. nrex
    nrex April 26 2016 15: 42
    +1
    Such precedents are not permissible. Thus, you can rob any non-country that does not agree with US policy.