Military Review

"Insert yourself !!!", or How to "burned" on RBC

130
On the eve of Vladimir Putin during the forum of the All-Russian Popular Front in Mordovia made fun of the journalistic profession. One of the participants of the forum was going to ask a question to the President of Russia, and he asked about her occupation.


“Journalist,” she replied, adding: “And she was a teacher.”

Vladimir Putin with a laugh in his voice:
Have you been a teacher? Did you become a journalist? What a fall ...


After a pause:
Just kidding...


It would seem that all journalistic brethren, including our entire creative team - the “Military Review” team, should bear a grudge against the president. Like, what does he allow himself - insults journalists, you know, even though he says that it was a joke ... Here are just a journalistic profession, and I think that colleagues from other media will not argue with that foam on the corners of the mouth, there is some kind of strange transformation. And this transformation is often far from positive. And only with journalism? ..

Some give reports about the “air condition explosion” and how “they set fire to themselves in Odessa”, others publish interviews about the “crucified boy”. Still others write about the "Altai armored police", the fourth about the "fireproof business card Yarosh." However, against the background of some wonderful materials, even the report “about the explosion of the air conditioner” may seem like flowers.

As a truly enchanting example of modern “journalism”, material from 21 of April of this year is found, published on the Internet site of a large information resource of RBC. Not just an information resource, but a whole media holding, which is customarily referred to among reputable economists and analysts. - Media holding, which includes more than a thousand professional journalists, editors, proofreaders, etc.

It's about the material that caused a serious discussion in the blogosphere. Moreover, the discussion was caused not so much by the material itself, as much as the form in which it was published online initially.

So, more about the work done by specialists of RBC from 21 April. Speech about article “Privatization under threat: why the authorities are not in a hurry with the sale of assets”such people as Maksim Tovkailo, Ekaterina Metelitsa, Lyudmila Podedova, Timofey Dzyadko, have applied their hands and talents to work on which.

It would seem, quite an ordinary article for RBC, in which once again it would seem to make it clear that privatization (and the widest) of state assets should be a panacea for the Russian economy. The article cites the words of the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, who said that if privatization of state assets was carried out, then it was necessary to allow firms with Russian jurisdiction and try to circumvent all sorts of gray schemes and offshore companies that would not allow the state treasury to receive the planned profit, and the entire economy - planned effect. It is this position of Vladimir Putin in the material of RBC that seems to be the main criticism. They say that you are giving “free” privatization - so that they can apply (and they even don’t want to put) a hand to everyone who is not lazy, including foreigners (apparently, such as William Browder or George Soros ...)

However, in this form the article was not submitted immediately. Initially, an article was published on RBC on the Internet in which the editor in the middle of the article asks the authors to “insert the comment of some manager and head of the analytical department,” who will criticize Putin’s proposal. The readers of the material quickly got their bearings and managed to keep the version of the RBC material, in which it was actually proposed to conduct a mini-interview in the way that the editorial staff benefits. The initial version is link.

"Insert yourself !!!", or How to "burned" on RBC


On the cached version (in Google) of the published material RBC blogger writes under the nickname vredina999 in LiveJournal. Link here.

After Vladimir Putin’s quotation, the editor’s entry appears in the RBC material, which eloquently testifies, to put it mildly, to the specific working method of the media holding. Here is the record (all typed with Caps Lock):

INSERT YOURSELF !!!
COMMENT ON ANY MANAGER OR CHIEF OF ANALYT DEPARTMENT WHEN THE PUTINOUS CONDITIONS OF THE POTENTIAL CUSTOMER HAVE BEEN REDUCED AND WHY. WHAT A TYPE OF VTB CONDITIONAL IF IF I CAN EXPOSE AN ANCHOR INVESTOR WHEN SALE ROSNEFT CONDITIONALLY, THIS IS STRONGLY EASIER PRIVATIZED.


The whole piquancy of the situation is not so much in the fact that this editorial comment was published, but in what its essence is. It turns out that RBC selects experts to comment on the material, describing in advance what they should say. And does he talk with these experts at all? That is, there is no talk of any “live” expert opinion. What we need, let them say ...

The funniest thing (if it’s a laughing matter at all) is that in place of this editorial comment really appeared an expert judgment necessary for RBC. And as if represented by the chief economist of PF Capital, Yevgeny Nadorshin. From RBC material:
As can be seen from the example of the privatization of RAO UES assets and the sale of Yukos assets, the need to participate in transactions of companies with Russian jurisdiction costs the creation of structures like “Baikalfinansgrupp”, reminds the chief economist of PF Capital Yevgeny Nadorshin. According to him, the sanctions not only limit the ability of Russian companies to attract financing in Western markets, but also drastically reduce the circle of Western investors interested in investing in Russian assets.


He said what RBC needed ...

And in order not to be limited to the “independent judgment” of one expert, RBC decided to add the opinion of the second. But whether something went wrong with creativity, or the expert really decided to “not glow”. In general, judge for yourself:

Since the sanctions, American and European investors have lost interest in Russian assets, even highly liquid and heavily depreciating, another financial advisor agrees, asking for anonymity.


Who do you agree with? With those who first explained to the expert, what opinion should he present? And how much can you find the same "anonymous consultants" who do not agree. Why not bring their version?

But it was said: “INSERT YOURSELF!”, And they inserted it ...

In general, in the language of modern youth: burned! ..

And after this you don’t know: if the media writes about something, presenting an “expert judgment”, then is this an expert judgment or something from the series “insert yourself” according to the RBC method?

As an option: a specialist on anonymity basis agreed that we don’t need such journalism ...
Author:
Photos used:
http://vredina999.livejournal.com
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich April 26 2016 06: 00
    +58
    The 2nd, oldest profession ... in the 1st oldest, it seems to me more decent, often just unhappy people ...
    1. Vadim-Skeptic
      Vadim-Skeptic April 26 2016 06: 09
      -30%
      And what you wanted is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 26 2016 07: 00
        +60
        Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
        EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA

        And tell me please: from whom are they free? From their owners who own these media? From their editors, who also have a host point of view? No free media in principle. And if there is, then somewhere on the distant Tau Ceti.
        1. EvgNik
          EvgNik April 26 2016 07: 21
          +6
          Perhaps Vadim, what you wrote is irony (I took it that way), then emphasize the main point more clearly.
          1. jjj
            jjj April 26 2016 09: 46
            +6
            I follow the coverage of economic events on the Yo-Media TV channel. Recently, I began to get the impression that a number of presenters are already conducting an open confrontation with Prokhorov's position. They started joking about "liberal values"
        2. Starover_Z
          Starover_Z April 26 2016 09: 51
          +6
          Quote: EvgNik
          Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
          EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA
          And tell me please: from whom are they free? From their owners who own these media?

          Who orders an article, he "edits" it!
          Why doesn't Free Media write about orphanages and boarding schools and attract investors there ?!
          Yes, simply because no one orders them from the Obligers,
          and for them to occupy their "unprintable spaces" with such free infoy is not interesting and not profitable!
        3. Dryuya2
          Dryuya2 April 26 2016 09: 55
          +2
          Quote: EvgNik
          And tell me please: from whom are they free? From their masters

          interesting video 2012
        4. Al1977
          Al1977 April 26 2016 10: 56
          -6
          Quote: EvgNik
          And tell me please: from whom are they free? From their owners who own these media? From their editors, who also have a host point of view? No free media in principle. And if there is, then somewhere on the distant Tau Ceti.

          According to your logic, there is no freedom either. Are you free yourself? This, comrade, is called demagoguery. I myself can determine for myself which opinion of the Chief Editor I should read. This is freedom of speech. Someone listens to Solovyov, the one who stigmatizes the West and has a house there and foreign cars, someone the nonsense of his comrade "I don't think it is a coincidence", someone likes the conspiracy theories of the Masons on RenTV, so they can ban all this and leave the Culture channel. More sense will be. But, I want to live in a country with views like Putin's, moderately liberal, moderately stately, without the wildest bias in either direction. And you dream further about building North Korea. Dreaming is not harmful.
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik April 26 2016 12: 31
            +6
            Quote: Al1977
            I want to live in a country with views like Putin’s, moderately liberal, moderately state, without the wildest distortions in any direction. And you dream further about building North Korea. Dreaming is not bad.

            How do you know Putin’s views? Did he discuss them with you over a bottle of Putin? Very interesting. And you think that now we have no distortions? I dare to disappoint you - there are more than enough distortions, you just have to live with your eyes open, then you will see (if you want, of course).
            I will not speak about personal freedom, only freedom of the press was discussed here. There is a desire to discuss - in PM, I will answer.
            And where did North Korea come from? I did not mention. Maybe she strangles you personally - your problems.
            1. Al1977
              Al1977 April 26 2016 13: 28
              0
              Quote: EvgNik
              How do you know Putin’s views?

              From his public speeches, statements by his spokesman, his decrees, his appointments, etc.
              You have not answered which channels form your information horizons? And so it turns out you are criticizing, but it’s not clear who you are targeting. At least a couple of media.
              About North Korea. Give another example of countries where a model for presenting information is implemented, ideal in your solely in your understanding. are there such countries? Russia?
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik April 26 2016 15: 14
                +2
                Quote: Al1977
                Give another example of countries where a model for presenting information is implemented, ideal in your solely in your understanding. are there such countries?

                In my understanding, there are no such countries. At all. I already wrote above that they probably are somewhere in the Tau Ceti .. Purely theoretically.
                Did I answer your question?
              2. NordUral
                NordUral April 28 2016 11: 04
                0
                A statesman - nationalizes, a liberal - privatizes.
                1. your1970
                  your1970 3 May 2016 23: 15
                  -1
                  “The statesman will nationalize, the liberal will privatize.” - judging by your logic, at first Kerensky was a stunned statesman, then Lenin followed him (the truth could not have been otherwise, the country had already been destroyed) ..
            2. Al1977
              Al1977 April 26 2016 14: 01
              -1
              Quote: EvgNik
              And you think that now we have no distortions?

              In which country of the world there are no distortions? Again demagoguery.
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik April 26 2016 16: 04
                +2
                Quote: Al1977
                In which country of the world there are no distortions? Again demagoguery.

                Now we are talking about our country, and not about any other. This is demagoguery. From your side.
                And talking about freedom of speech - you can look at the minuses to the comments of this particular article - there is no freedom of opinion. Each of his points of view considers the only true.
                I did not set a single one - I am truly a free person.
                1. Al1977
                  Al1977 April 26 2016 16: 51
                  -1
                  Quote: EvgNik
                  Each of his points of view considers the only true.

                  Maybe I misunderstood you, but you are for the fact that the media that do not agree with you, nafig close .. or "format" under the "correct" guys in the Kremlin?
                  If you are for the fact that everyone watches what he sees fit, then there are no complaints. And if "who is not with me is an enemy of the people," then I ask you to show the "correct media" that do not "fulfill the order of the owners."
                  1. EvgNik
                    EvgNik April 26 2016 16: 59
                    +5
                    Quote: Al1977
                    If you are for the fact that everyone is watching what he considers necessary, then there are no complaints.


                    Yuri Levitansky

                    Everyone chooses for themselves

                    Everyone chooses for themselves
                    woman, religion, road.
                    Serve the devil or the prophet -
                    everyone chooses for himself.
                    Everyone chooses by themselves
                    word for love and for prayer.
                    A sword for a duel, a sword for a battle
                    everyone chooses for himself.
                    Everyone chooses by themselves.
                    Shield and plate, staff and patches,
                    measure of final reckoning
                    everyone chooses for himself.
                    Everyone chooses for themselves.
                    I choose too - as I can.
                    I have no complaints against anyone.
                    Everyone chooses for themselves.
            3. CONTROL
              CONTROL April 26 2016 14: 13
              +1
              Quote: EvgNik
              I will not speak about personal freedom, only freedom of the press was discussed here.

              Freedom of the press is directly related to and depends on personal freedom! and from all other "freedoms" that ALWAYS have restrictions!
              ...Have a family? There is a work? Friends ... gastronomic preferences, finally! ... With a conscience - and its freedom! - how, order? or at AI197 in this regard, "sailor anarchy"? ...
              In general, the topic of any freedom is very slippery in terms of discussion! Because - everyone is free in his own way! ...
              -------
              Example: do you have money? a lot of? Good, good - they give the feeling of freedom! Deceptive, though ... since tomorrow 4-5 strong guys may "look at the light" and begin to intensively "discuss" the topic of financial freedom ... Or a jealously responsible official from the supervisory authorities will look at the same "light" - for that the same theme! ... There are also options for the exercise of freedoms ...
              Conclusion: freedom, albeit relative, is worthy of one who is ready to defend it, and to give this freedom - and sometimes life! - for her, for freedom! ...
              The paradox, however ...
          2. CONTROL
            CONTROL April 26 2016 14: 04
            +1
            Quote: Al1977
            According to your logic, there is no freedom. Are you free then? This, comrade, is called demagogy. I myself can determine for myself what opinion of the Chief Editor I should read. This is freedom of speech.

            ... There is no freedom, but there is peace and will! ...
            ------------------
            They teach, they teach, but - not feed the horse!
            Even complete "freedom of speech" does not exist, not to mention other freedoms ... And spitting in "free flight" depends on the forces of gravity!
            1. Al1977
              Al1977 April 27 2016 11: 24
              -3
              Quote: CONTROL
              They teach, they teach, but - not feed the horse!
              Even complete "freedom of speech" does not exist, not to mention other freedoms ... And spitting in "free flight" depends on the forces of gravity!

              Saying the word "table" each of us will represent two completely different objects. So I don't need to write your philosophical opuses here. You have no freedom - this is your personal feeling. Leave it with you.
              You in the constitutional court prove that articles on freedom do not make sense, and I live according to the Constitution.
            2. Erg
              Erg April 28 2016 07: 49
              +3
              Freedom is the most powerful weapon for destroying the state. Emancipation is a weapon of family destruction. Is there freedom in the states themselves? They keep this beast in a cage, release it only on enemies ... Whoever did not realize this - suffered severe losses and disappointments. There is morality, traditions and most importantly - order! This is the defense against "freedom" and "democracy".
          3. Andrew67
            Andrew67 April 27 2016 21: 48
            0
            Ah well done. I fully share!
          4. NordUral
            NordUral April 28 2016 11: 03
            +1
            Liberal with the state does not get married. And you already decide, you are our psychic, if you see Putin’s views through and through.
        5. Simple
          Simple April 26 2016 11: 23
          -8
          "Free press" is meant to be free from influence /
          State pressure (USSR typical example)

          Все.
          But Pupkin belongs or the Rothschilds - the tenth matter. They are not a state
        6. Erg
          Erg April 28 2016 07: 37
          0
          Or in prison, you forgot to supplement hi
      2. udincev
        udincev April 26 2016 07: 45
        +5
        Right. If we correct it a little: he has the RIGHT, but he is forced to substantiate the opinion of the owners in accordance with the editorial policy ... Because money is paid for this, and not his journalistic personal ("free") opinion.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit April 26 2016 09: 11
          +5
          Even so-called "free journalists" almost always carry out someone's order. I agree that there may be decent people among journalists, but let them say thank you to their "fellows" in the pen for discrediting their profession.
        2. 97110
          97110 April 26 2016 09: 21
          +2
          Quote: udincev
          If a little corrected: it has the LAW, but is forced to justify the opinion of the owners in accordance with the editorial policy ...

          It could be even easier. The journalist MUST sell! On the second day, mother reports from the city of Kotlas (remember the terrible flood in Ustyug, the high-precision bombing of the Aerospace Forces on the Russian river Sukhona, heroism and oh, happiness - budgetary cash flows in the district administration, a single impulse of the Vologda residents to collect everything to help the victims - what an informational occasion!) that a state of emergency has been declared, but (went, checked, and she is 85 years old) there is no water! Where did that go? 70 km from Ustyug to Kotlas! From time immemorial, the ice below Ustyug has been blown up in the spring. This is the Northern Dvina, for those places such a flood is a NORMAL phenomenon! Can you give an interview to the head of the Ustyug district on the DH, about how they prepared with the passage of melt water? Have you ordered heavy SU-24 bombers since last year? Or unexpected again? Have you tried blackening the ice? The videoconferencing system is omnipotent, any inactivity of the authorities will easily be bombed, the President will attend to and help. The main thing is to burn the whole street. When will the talkers and troublemakers be removed from the media? Silly question - never. Good looking, well-trained voice and heroic appearance, will read about 122-mm mortars from the monitor without hesitation. The main thing is that the voice is delivered, with intonation to emphasize the whole tragedy of an ordinary situation. Or keep silent - there is nothing on the monitor - about what is really important. Who is to blame for 0,5 billion losses in Veliky Ustyug? Where did the water in the Volga and the Don go in 2015? What such great dry land was that the depths were gone by the middle of the navigation?
          1. jjj
            jjj April 26 2016 09: 54
            +1
            Quote: 97110
            This is the Northern Dvina, for those places such a flood is an ordinary occurrence!

            Once flooded and Arkhangelsk, especially its lowland - Solombalu. It took a lot of money to restore. Since then, icebreakers have been sailing the sleeves of the Dvina delta ahead of time. The ice is being lowered. Gradually, icebreakers rise almost to Kholmogor. They explode for years in a bottleneck near Orletsy. The ice drift has been quiet for many years. This, of course, is expensive. But in the regional budget money is specially planned for this. And it is much cheaper than recovering from the elements. Apparently, soon and Vologda will come to a similar thought. Especially under Kotlas in Limend - a backwater. There is a river school. There are tugs that can help. Yes, and we heard that the Vologda governor thanked Arkhangelsk for the two icebreakers provided
            1. 97110
              97110 April 26 2016 16: 13
              0
              Quote: jjj
              Especially under Kotlas in Limend - a backwater. There is a river school. There are tugs that can help.

              I am Limendian. I remember the high flood was about 70 years old. Without cod and EXTRAORDINARY POSITION, dams were raised around the village. I was a schoolboy, I saw. Soviet-style, without screaming. They brought cars with ASG, put a retaining wall of boards along the edge of the embankment, WORKED! Now an emergency has been declared in Kotlas - a normal reaction to the President’s explanations. Only more people did not notice anything. Kotlas did not drown spawn, he is on the mainland coast. Drowned Tulubyevo, every spring they went to live on barges. There was such a backwater, a non-self-propelled fleet sludge station. Drowned Bachaga, still here and there something. But no one pulled half a billion out of the budget. There is an insurance system. Insure - no, the President will help us. And these media have really lifted up already. Noise for any reason to heaven. After the President explained to us that the state of emergency in Ustyug, 2 weeks have already passed. Where is the wave of catastrophic flood? Mother just reported by phone - there is no reason for noise in Limend. And there are no correspondents. With a question: what exactly happened in Ustyug? What kind of local flood? Maybe they have the leadership of the Ministry of Emergencies seeks stars? For a long time not encouraged, bypassed the rank? Give them a colonel and retire. No budget is enough to help. Fire prevention - what is it? The president will help. Flood - The President will help. Maybe it's time to punish?
      3. Vend
        Vend April 26 2016 09: 38
        +7
        Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
        And what you wanted is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA.

        Freedom of speech should not be confused with rudeness and lack of culture. And this is just confusing. And not only in Russia, but also in other countries. In some, rudeness and "yellow" opinion is the norm.
        1. Al1977
          Al1977 April 26 2016 11: 39
          +2
          Quote: Wend
          Freedom of speech should not be confused with rudeness and lack of culture. And this is just confusing. And not only in Russia, but also in other countries. In some, rudeness and "yellow" opinion is the norm.

          Totally agree with you. Only some rudeness and lies are allowed, while others are closed for this. And they present only one point of view, specifically the pro-Putin point of view, explaining this by the fact that other points of view have "ears growing", owners and so on.
          They say our people are so stupid that they themselves can’t decide what to watch and read. Western media do not read, they are enemies of the people, do not read criticism of Putin, this is ordering. But listen to Kiselyov-Tolstoy-Soloviev - this is not an order and not a lie.
          In general, TV has so descredited itself that getting on the news channels there is a desire to instantly switch, this cheap nonsense is no longer possible to listen to. These "information warriors" with disgusting fat faces and houses in Italy and vineyards in the Crimea spoiled the profession.
      4. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan April 26 2016 10: 57
        +1
        This is not freedom of speech - but false propaganda that is broadcast through the RBC channel !!! Selling nits ... And I used to think why they were breaking such anti-Russian nonsense on their airs))) ... Look who owns this channel - the key shareholder - M. Prokhorov))) The creator of the E-mobile and PARTNAS)) ) ... Damn hornless ... The fact that he has not yet been imprisoned just speaks of freedom of speech in Russia and very very humane law enforcement bodies and security))) ...
      5. Dimontius
        Dimontius April 26 2016 13: 25
        +2
        I don’t know about this case, but on RBC there are often opinions more mundane to reality than on all other TV channels. Yes, I agree - there are those who are annoying, who openly go against the official position of our government and their channels (import substitution, the actions of the Central Bank, the recent offshore scandal, etc.). But how not cool RBC is our Bloomberg! The only one, to my great regret! You know, those who watch this channel will agree with me that RBC is a kind of counterbalance to the "big three". On it, do not be afraid to show negative news around Russia and discuss them almost always with respected experts! I agree there are also such experts who want to spit in their faces, but as mentioned above, no matter how, it seems, we have freedom of speech, so this is their right. Therefore, I would not argue about Prokhorov's intentional position to manipulate something. IMHO.
        1. Come on
          Come on April 27 2016 02: 06
          -2
          Quote: Dimontius
          I don’t know about this case, but on RBC there are often opinions expressed more mundane to reality than on all other TV channels. Yes, I agree - there are those who are annoying, who are openly against the official position of our government and their channels (import substitution, actions of the Central Bank, recent offshore scandal, etc.)


          What a feeling that you are contradicting yourself. Is it not the position of power and only it is broadcast on federal channels?
      6. Vadim42
        Vadim42 April 26 2016 14: 24
        0
        Merkel, tell us about freedom of speech, otherwise she forgot.
      7. JIaIIoTb
        JIaIIoTb April 26 2016 14: 59
        +1
        Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
        And what you wanted is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA.


        The freedom to speak the truth, the freedom to speak about facts, this is freedom of speech and free media.
        Everything else is from the crafty and prostitution.
        1. Come on
          Come on April 27 2016 02: 12
          -1
          Quote: JIaIIoTb
          The freedom to speak the truth, the freedom to speak about facts, this is freedom of speech and free media.
          Everything else is from the crafty and prostitution.


          That's right, for this reason this case should be brought up for public discussion, and both parties, both those who saw the flies in RBC, and RBC themselves should be able to comment on this. This is freedom of speech and free media. And if RBC is blamed publicly, and no one hears their refutation, or version of events, this is censorship.
      8. There are a lot of us
        There are a lot of us April 28 2016 09: 19
        +1
        Yeah ... Has the right to lie with impunity, smear with dirt and dump in feathers. This is the style of liberal journalism, free of conscience and other obsolete restrictions
      9. NordUral
        NordUral April 28 2016 10: 55
        0
        Don't you get bored yet about the freedom of journalism to speak out? It is time to already understand that there is none (although it may be that it is a subtle irony in your words, the subtlest).
      10. VeryBravePiggy
        VeryBravePiggy 1 May 2016 09: 34
        +1
        They had the right so often that it hung itself from shame and hopelessness.
        And I will repeat about the journalist, and I will remind you of this rhyme: "Believe the journalist only to the extent that he no longer breathes."
    2. demchuk.ig
      demchuk.ig April 28 2016 07: 19
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      The 2nd, oldest profession ... in the 1st oldest, it seems to me more decent, often just unhappy people ...

      But in the second oldest, there are more happy ones, with the realization that they humiliate and destroy their country!
  2. Ayujak
    Ayujak April 26 2016 06: 01
    +13
    I haven't listened to this RBC for a long time. This is the same as "rain" with "echo". NTV and Kommersant are also in this cohort. Although, we have a free country. And the press is free. Even more than in the most "democratic" countries.
    1. energy701
      energy701 April 26 2016 07: 33
      +4
      "And the press is free" - it’s just a pity that sooooo many journalists understand this freedom as ALMOST !!!! I think that censorship must be !!! It's another matter that the rules and frameworks of censorship should be decided by a wide circle of journalists!
    2. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K April 26 2016 07: 57
      -14%
      Active hitting RBC went after the publication of an investigation about Putin’s daughter Tikhonova, Roldugin, Panama dossiers and other corruption scandals.
      The owner of RBC Prokhorov understood the seriousness of the collision after a recent search in his office. One of the last independent media outlets will probably be sold, probably to Putin’s friend Kovalchuk, the owner of RenTV. The author of the article, Comrade Volodin, also did not fail to contribute to the ordered run-in to RBC. Personally, I will be very sorry if the next independent media enters the Kremlin media holding and the people will only receive the information that the boyars would like to write to him above.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 26 2016 08: 24
        +8
        Quote: Nikolai K
        people will haw only the information that they would like to write to him at the top of the boyars.

        And from whom is information coming now? And who shapes the point of view of RBC?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K April 26 2016 09: 38
          +5
          The point of view is given by a journalist subordinate to the editorial office set by the owner. In our country, 90% of the media is either state-owned or controlled by Putin’s friends.

          RTR The owner of the state. Channels Russia, Vesti, Culture, Bibigon, Sport, RTR planet, etc., radio stations Mayak, Vesti FM, Radio of Russia, Voice of Russia, Orpheus, etc.

          Moscow Media The owner is the government of Moscow. TV channels Moscow 24, Moscow Trust, Radio stations Moscow FM, Radio Moscow, Newspaper Arguments and Facts.

          First channel. A controlling stake in the state blocking with the National Media Group see below)

          National Media Group. Alina Kabaeva, Chairman of the Board of Directors. Owners: Bank Russia (Kovalchuk and other friends), SOGAZ Insurance Group (controlling stake in Bank Rossiya), Surgutneftegaz (Vekselberg). Owns: Channel 5, RenTV, a blocking stake in Channel 1, Gaeta Izvestia, Sport Express, etc.

          STS-Media. Controlled by the National Media Group. After the imposition of sanctions, part of the shares were sold, apparently to the structures of Mordashov. By the way, the Kremlin is generally characterized by the imposition of the media on loyal businessmen (for example, Surgutneftegaz in the National Media Group) as a "social burden" while maintaining overall control and management by friends. Still, why invest in unprofitable media when you can strain your business and invest your money in much more profitable projects. Owns: channels STS, Domashny, Che, are engaged in the production of television series.


          Gazprom-Media Holding. The owner is Gazprombank, a controlling stake in which belongs to the NPF Gazfond, which is part of SOGAZ, which is owned by Bank of Russia. Channels NTV, NTV plus, TNT, NTV-cinema, radio stations Autoradio, Эхо Москвы, Humor FM and many others, Seven Days editions, Caravan of history, etc.

          Now tell me the serious media that have remained independent of Putin and his friends. In addition to sports and third-rate entertainment channels, RBC and Vedomosti (they also want to buy a national media group) I do not know others.
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik April 26 2016 12: 36
            +3
            Quote: Nikolai K
            Now tell me the serious media that have remained independent of Putin and his friends

            Cheers, cheers, cheers. I don’t look at one box, I learned not to respond to advertisements and news feeds, and even Kaspersky helps, cuts off all sorts of rubbish.
            1. Nikolay K
              Nikolay K April 26 2016 12: 43
              -1
              One hell I'm not looking at the box

              Do not worry, soon it will reach the Internet. Our lawmakers really want to recognize Yandex and other search engines as the media, so that they fall under the relevant regulatory standards. And in the future they plan to ban access to foreign content, as in China. So soon the only uncensored publication will be the Bible, and I’m not sure.
              Well, you continue to sit further and not react. Kaspersky to help you!
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Nikolay K
              Nikolay K April 26 2016 13: 11
              -1
              And further. As you rightly noted, fewer people watch TV or, as it is often called today, a zombie. Because all the central channels are in the same hands and sometimes such nonsense and propaganda is pouring out that a person has two choices: either continue to watch IT and become a puppet of political puppeteers, or just stop watching TV, and sometimes even stop being interested in news, politics and etc. Actually both options suit the Kremlin.
              You know, in large Western companies, sometimes 5% of the shares are enough to control the business. Because the rest of the shares are highly dispersed, and the shareholders are inert. The task of modern political strategists is to make Russian society as apolitical as possible. The goal is the same - control over business and the country. Indeed, for the current government, the main goal is to maintain their own power, everything else is secondary.
          2. Rivares
            Rivares April 26 2016 17: 40
            +6
            Quote: Nikolai K
            In our country, 90% of the media is either state-owned or controlled by Putin’s friends.

            Nikolay, wait a minute, and the fact that 90% of the media in the world is either state or controlled by the State Department doesn’t bother you ??
            And fairy tales about independent media are not necessary. All media are addicted. And recently, it has become fashionable to call the enemy media independent.
            1. Come on
              Come on April 27 2016 02: 25
              -2
              Quote: Rivares
              Nikolay, wait a minute, and the fact that 90% of the media in the world is either state or controlled by the State Department doesn’t bother you ??


              And this is with a fright? And in the USA itself, there are a lot of media competing for the viewer (listener, reader), which do not leave a wet spot on the authorities, on which they generally show (say, write) what they themselves consider necessary. Of course, you have the right to your opinion, as well as the right to be mistaken.
              1. Dali
                Dali April 28 2016 15: 00
                +3
                Quote: Yeah, well.
                And this is with a fright? And in the USA itself, there are a lot of media competing for the viewer (listener, reader), which do not leave a wet spot on the authorities, on which they generally show (say, write) what they themselves consider necessary. Of course, you have the right to your opinion, as well as the right to be mistaken.

                laughing laughing laughing
                Quote: Yeah, well.
                And in the USA itself, there are a lot of media competing for the viewer (listener, reader), which do not leave a wet spot on the authorities, on which they generally show (say, write) what they themselves consider necessary.

                laughing laughing laughing

                And you want to give these performances as an independent point of view? belay laughing

                You yourself would go down from the moon to the earth!
              2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Al1977
          Al1977 April 26 2016 12: 20
          +3
          Quote: EvgNik
          And from whom is information coming now? And who shapes the point of view of RBC?

          What media do you watch and read? What you don’t see is understandable, but it’s not clear what you think is worthy.
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik April 26 2016 15: 44
            0
            Quote: Al1977
            What media do you watch and read?

            I do not watch or read. MEDIA. In the internet - IN, sometimes REGNUM. My planet. I will not list some sites. In Contact and others - not a member.
        4. Come on
          Come on April 27 2016 02: 17
          -3
          Quote: EvgNik
          And from whom is information coming now? And who shapes the point of view of RBC?


          Why should information come from someone and why should someone "shape" RBC's point of view? Serious media outlets, or rather their editors, neither give orders nor accept and should not form anything. The only thing that is discussed is topics for articles, stories, journalistic investigations. And here everything depends on the professionalism, impartiality and objectivity of the journalist himself, who takes up the job.
      2. Al1977
        Al1977 April 26 2016 12: 38
        +3
        Quote: Nikolai K
        Active hitting RBC went after the publication of an investigation about Putin’s daughter Tikhonova, Roldugin, Panama dossiers and other corruption scandals.
        The owner of RBC Prokhorov understood the seriousness of the collision after a recent search in his office. One of the last independent media outlets will probably be sold, probably to Putin’s friend Kovalchuk, the owner of RenTV. The author of the article, Comrade Volodin, also did not fail to contribute to the ordered run-in to RBC. Personally, I will be very sorry if the next independent media enters the Kremlin media holding and the people will only receive the information that the boyars would like to write to him above.

        That's right, but they will explain to you that this is because they are enemies of the people. They oppose our great people, they want not to show theft in the Kremlin, but they are working against our old people, grandfathers who defeated fascism, that is, they are working against our people.
        Criticism of the authorities is equated to harm to our people. There is no need to convince anyone of the opposite, especially those who are "ideological warriors" here and not the interlocutor. Then someone laid out a screen of the site, and in the bookmarks itself a discussion of the latest Samsung model, which is not very cheap, by the way.
      3. Rivares
        Rivares April 26 2016 17: 30
        +3
        Quote: Nikolai K
        Active hitting RBC went after the publication of the investigation of Putin’s daughter Tikhonova,

        There is nowhere to put brands on RBC. During the Kiev revolution they licked the Piglet and Rabbit under the tail so that they felt ashamed in front of the Russian audience and they removed the link on their website to the news of Ukraine. Anyone can read the "non-profitable" RBC by entering rbc.ua through the animizer and make their own opinion and their "independence"
        PS over the past 3-4 years, the quality of RBC has fallen to the yellow liberal-litter Internet newspaper.
        1. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K April 27 2016 20: 37
          -3
          As you can imagine, the rbc.ua resource is designed for the Ukrainian audience, has a local editorial office and is subject to Ukrainian censorship, like "our" Russian one. To accuse the publication of adjusting to the rules of the game in a specific national market is just as "reasonable" as accusing Sberbank of the fact that employees of his Ukrainian daughter speak Ukrainian or, God forbid, support Poroshenko.
      4. user1212
        user1212 April 28 2016 18: 59
        +1
        Quote: Nikolai K
        Active hitting RBC went after the publication of an investigation about Putin’s daughter Tikhonova, Roldugin, Panama dossiers and other corruption scandals.

        An eternal excuse for the "opposition". They have any criminal who shouted "down with Putin" in court immediately becomes a political prisoner.
        Quote: Nikolai K
        One of the last independent media

        You are confusing the concept of "independent media", which RBC is not, with the concept of "anti-government media", which is exactly what RBC is. RBK is a propaganda channel, as evidenced by incl. and this article
    3. Al1977
      Al1977 April 26 2016 12: 18
      +1
      Quote: AYUJAK
      I haven't listened to this RBC for a long time. This is the same as "rain" with "echo". NTV and Kommersant are also in this cohort. Although, we have a free country. And the press is free. Even more than in the most "democratic" countries.

      Can you list your TOP 5 of our media with reliable information about the situation in the country?
      1. opus
        opus April 26 2016 19: 13
        +5
        Quote: Al1977
        Can you list your TOP 5 of our media with reliable information about the situation in the country?

        Quote: Al1977
        Bring your top 5 true media in our country.

        I listen to FM news regularly. I don’t know what about the truth. But very interesting data / facts. I checked: it matches.
        Evgeny Satanovsky (as he expires, he will anneal- SPEAKS BETTER than he writes), Sergey Korneevsky,
        Dmitry Kulikov ("Vysotsky" ether, he has enough air), Bear's corner, etc.
        Soloviev, so-so.

        The guests there are very interesting. Historical facts, there is generally a class (many historians, "old school")

        -------------------------------------------------- -

        Author Volodin Alexey-I just want to say / ask you:
        What about the article?
        What is the article for?


        Quote: Author Volodin Alexey
        "Insert yourself !!!", or How to "burned" on RBC

        What happened?
        Well, the "galleys" got to the release, someone got screwed.
        But that’s how they work (most work like that). This is a normal workflow. They are free to invite experts who they like, clever understand the order, will not read, rating will drop, change their mind
        Well, they do not agree with GDP and privatization.
        So what?
        What does the author offer (and do Top War users support / require)?
        So it is necessary:

        ?
        or so ("put on a stake"):

        ?
        What then are we left with? with "Results of the week"?
        ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        and so survived: so that my grandmother could hold water,need Putin and communication (once a year) of the president with the people, the road to do-Putin, salary and liquidate the slave-owning fish factory in Sakhalin- Putin again etc.
        Soon to remove it, you will need the feeling of the President with the people and the personal intervention of the supreme.
        This is the result of what?
        In my opinion this is the result:
        -press no (free from the state and approximate GDP)
        - a deck (shobla), which upstairs hangs out GDP by horizontal transfer. If only there was personal devotion.
        - there is no opposition, but the one that is "pseudo", who will listen to it after tea-drinking in the State Department? And it's not opposition, clowns
        1. opus
          opus April 26 2016 19: 21
          +4
          What is the result?
          Such:

          For the right words 35 "-" (ran past, saw nagazhennoe, shit more ("-" set), then ran) ..
          Although I suspect "Vadim-Skeptic" had something completely different than how he was understood.

          Freedom of speech - the right of a person to freely express his thoughts. Freedom of expression, both orally and in writing (freedom of the press and the media)

          “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (Article 19), “European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms” (Article 10) and the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 29).
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts April 26 2016 06: 06
    +5
    Ha ha ha, made fun. This is the standard way of preparing and presenting materials by all "free" media. Remember 08.08.08. How a girl and her aunt from South Ossetia were led to the "correct" answer. Only they call it journalism, and Kiselev calls it propaganda.
    Z.Y. I would joke on Putin’s place as well bully (no offense will be told to reporters).
  4. VP
    VP April 26 2016 06: 26
    +2
    A good article, with a link to the caught by the hand, with the disclosure of the topic, the author an honest plus
  5. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 26 2016 06: 34
    +1
    RBC !? Trash! One loot on your mind! Feeling the mother will be sold, the question is price! Some deductions, transfers, exchange rates, for people and the country, in principle, they do not care!
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 April 26 2016 13: 46
      +1
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      RBC !? Trash! One loot on your mind!

      This is the same as declaring topwar that everything is about weapons and hostilities))) Trollll?))))
      1. Rivares
        Rivares April 26 2016 17: 46
        +1
        Quote: Al1977
        It’s the same as announcing topwar that it’s all about weapons and military operations

        The propaganda of war however! Information !!!
  6. Bramb
    Bramb April 26 2016 06: 37
    -5
    Not just an information resource, but a whole media holding, which is commonly referred to among authoritative economists and analysts. - A media holding, which includes more than a thousand professional journalists, editors, proofreaders, etc.
    ---------------
    For a long time no self-respecting people have been reading RBC! Your information is outdated.
    And the so-called professionals are just stupid empty-headed people who receive money for any nonsense. The term "professional" used to be understood as a highly qualified specialist. But now it is often just someone sitting on the paycheck.
    As you can see, the author himself is so professional that it’s good that he is not a teacher. It would be better to sweep the streets, and then a lot of Tajiks divorced. Would be engaged in useful business.
    1. Volodin
      April 26 2016 06: 46
      +8
      Quote: Bramb
      As we see

      To his beloved in the plural. We, Nicholas II ...

      Quote: Bramb
      what is good, what is not a teacher.

      Where did you get this information? Obs? ..

      Quote: Bramb
      It would be better sweeping the streets

      In general, do not say what to do, and I will not tell you where to go.
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 April 26 2016 07: 39
        +10
        Bramb
        There are a lot of lies and distortions in the media. RBC refers to such resources.
        Caught a lie accident accident happened, RBC printed false information, indicated an error. A derailed wagon or a fuel oil tank in a river are two different things. They did not respond, although it was worth calling the governor's office and finding out. More RBC I do not believe, for them the worse, the better.
        Volodin's articles are always of high quality, the author is only respected. This article is no exception.
        Your Bramb sarcasm is inappropriate in this case. Good reporters are only respected, and a broom in hand is for you.
        1. Exumer
          Exumer April 26 2016 14: 34
          +4
          With regards to my case, which occurred at the beginning of this year, our company tried to bankrupt one well-known road company by submitting a relevant application to the arbitration court, and as is usually the case, the employees of the court apparatus made a mistake, namely, the court's website displayed information where our company was listed in the co-defendants , as a result, a number of media outlets, including RBC, Kommersant, without properly (elementary) checking the information, publish it on their websites and seriously damage the reputation of our company, which had to explain to its partners, and then demand a refutation of the article from both court employees and "professional journalist of western tailoring", which, incidentally, they never refuted.
  7. wandlitz
    wandlitz April 26 2016 06: 38
    +4
    TV journalists, for example, often say this, figuratively speaking they cross the hedgehog and snake in their reports that a hysteria of laughter begins with some professionals.
  8. gergi
    gergi April 26 2016 06: 39
    0
    RBC is a solid fifth column. The owner of this disgrace is a certain Prokhorov. Diligently digs under Putin. Enemy of the people.
  9. Dex
    Dex April 26 2016 07: 01
    +1
    Prokhorov reached the level of the world western media (bibisi and sienen) in his decline in the quality of propaganda
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 26 2016 07: 04
    +1
    testifies, to put it mildly, to the specific technique of the media holding

    So this specificity can be seen from the appearance of RBC on television. The author correctly focused his attention on this channel. Information about events in Russia and abroad (sometimes, switching channels, I linger on the running line) is presented exclusively from the position of their editorial policy - liberally criticizing. Therefore, their former employees (Nemtsov's daughter) receive awards in the USA. RBK, "Dozhd", "EM" of one field of berries, it's a shame that they are working against Russia with the direct permission of our authorities.
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 26 2016 07: 17
    +2
    And you read the headings of the articles on mylru.
    Those that are on the right in the tape.
    I just remember a bunch of articles about Putin’s cancer and his imminent death in 2014.
  12. Спартак
    Спартак April 26 2016 07: 24
    +1
    Generation PI, Pelevin studied the problem much more deeply. Of course, the editor went wrong, but this is all over the place in our media, the so-called opinion formation ...
  13. hohryakov066
    hohryakov066 April 26 2016 07: 27
    +2
    Just look at the RBC news column and the diagnosis immediately becomes clear. An example is the RBC column at www.gismeteo.ru.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik April 26 2016 08: 26
      0
      Quote: hohryakov066
      An example is the RBC column at www.gismeteo.ru

      The news feed is as reliable as the weather forecast.
  14. Maegrom
    Maegrom April 26 2016 08: 19
    +2
    But Yarosh’s business card, strangely enough, turned out to be real. He himself admitted the other day.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA April 26 2016 10: 17
      +1
      Quote: Maegrom
      But Yarosh’s business card, strangely enough, turned out to be real. He himself admitted the other day.

      Yeah ... Mokrushin had a translation of an interview with Yarosh:
      It pains me that the body of Mikhail Stanislavenko could not be taken under fire. He really had documents and my business card. Everyone left documents and personal belongings, but he was not our fighter, and he, despite the order, left a business card in his memory.

      However, over spy stone also laughed at first ...
  15. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin April 26 2016 08: 32
    +1
    Where is the line between freedom of speech and subversive anti-state activities?
    It would be better to label it, otherwise manure will float systematically.
    1. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K April 26 2016 13: 52
      -3
      Where is the line between freedom of speech and subversive anti-state activities?

      Why is it incomprehensible? When you are FOR Putin, this is freedom of speech, and when AGAINST is subversive anti-state activity. smile
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. Pitot
    Pitot April 26 2016 09: 07
    +1
    VVP joked when he said - "just kidding, just kidding" ....
  17. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 26 2016 09: 13
    -1
    It has long been said - who pays, he orders music, and not only ...
  18. Urgen
    Urgen April 26 2016 10: 27
    0
    Why such a stir?
    It turned out a "gaffe". Well, who doesn't?
    My IMHO, that a journalist can be honest only when independent, and not "sitting on a salary."
    If you get a salary - you need to work out, which we see on the example of RBC.
    I am convinced that the same thing can appear on ANY media resource. And it doesn’t matter to whom it belongs. For he who feeds the girl dances her.
    With regard to the hi to RBC, do not forget that they have their own audience. Which they work for. The same applies to ECA and others.
    And our antipathy to these resources of this fact does not cancel.
    1. Come on
      Come on April 27 2016 02: 56
      -3
      Quote: Urgen
      My IMHO, that a journalist can be honest only when independent, and not "sitting on a salary."
      If you get a salary - you need to work out, which we see on the example of RBC.
      I am convinced that the same thing can appear on ANY media resource. And it doesn’t matter to whom it belongs. For he who feeds the girl dances her.
      With regard to the hi to RBC, do not forget that they have their own audience. Which they work for. The same applies to ECA and others.
      And our antipathy to these resources of this fact does not cancel.



      You are a little mistaken. In those media that call themselves independent and objective as follows:

      Serious media, or rather their editors, neither give orders, nor accept, and should not form anything. The only things that are discussed are topics for - articles, stories, journalistic investigations. And it all depends on - professionalism, impartiality and objectivity of the journalist who takes up the job. Does this a free journalist for the editorial board for a fee, just like that, or a journalist employee, this is secondary.

      Even if the media has an investor, this does not mean that he indicates something in the editorial policy. It only means that when creating the media resource needed money to rent an office, buy a piece of paper and a pencil. Nothing more. And not necessarily the investor does it for the sake of goodwill and emotional impulses. Some media over time, thanks to sharp reports, fearless and professional journalists who get to the bottom of those facts that no one gets to them, become very popular. They have, which is very important in independent media (in contrast to the media sitting on a state card), a reputation. And this reputation is views, quotas, newspapers bought, the number of radio listeners. And this, in turn, is the high cost of a second of advertising, a square centimeter, or a pixel in print or online media. Some journalists, as they gain a reputation, earn a lot of money in books, especially with a worldwide reputation. An example is an Italian journalist who wrote a book about the most dangerous mafia in Europe Gamorra (this book has a thin film and a doc. Film). He really is now under the gun of the mafia and must walk under the constant cover of a carabinieri. Surely you will not attribute to him a desire to promote.
      1. Come on
        Come on April 27 2016 04: 38
        +1
        Oops, but what is the minus then again? :)) If you don’t agree, justify it, but put the minus to your health! :)) It’s just like I wrote the obvious things, how it actually works, not everywhere, of course, but still there such places. Anyway.
  19. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf April 26 2016 10: 35
    +2
    Not only does RBC have a magazine. All media punks are like that .. Under communists, they sing for liberals and liberals. All the time they repaint. They want to eat and the children are small at home, they’re chameleoning. Usual selling gang, for a piece .
  20. Simple
    Simple April 26 2016 11: 25
    -1
    I read the article, I did not understand anything.
    What to do then?
    Atu rbc? you cannot have mercy ...
    Where to put a comma?
  21. ruAlex
    ruAlex April 26 2016 11: 36
    -1
    Freedom of speech, like all the freedoms that the West has instilled in us, is all fiction and one of the elements of external control.
  22. Exumer
    Exumer April 26 2016 11: 44
    +3
    This online resource is one of the champions for publishing information that is not true. Well, they do not want to check it before publishing even kill))
  23. Kelwin
    Kelwin April 26 2016 12: 03
    0
    Comrades, this is all of course interesting, but it cannot be argued that such a thing took place. In Google, the normal version is, and the screen does not prove anything. No, not because photoshop)) Because the page code is edited on the fly with the built-in editor and the screen is made. There will be no traces of editing there, although the contents are bullshit.
    For an example screen of this material, see the heading))
  24. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 April 26 2016 12: 11
    +1
    during the forum of the All-Russian Popular Front in Mordovia
    The more you look at the communication of GDP with the people, the more you realize that the vector of public concern tends to irresponsibility of the executive and administrative power. Is it not the responsibility of the Government and its local structures? Why do people turn directly to GDP on issues that specific ministries, ministers and officials should decide? Why, after such appeals, there are no resignation requests, personnel changes on the initiative of the Head of Government, ministers or governors?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Moore
      Moore April 26 2016 13: 14
      +1
      Quote: Vladimir61
      Why, after such appeals, are there no resignations, personnel changes on the initiative of the Head of Government, ministers or governors?

      Judge for yourself - what kind of bureaucrat in his right mind and memory will turn away from the trough on his own and proudly declare: "I did not manage, I am leaving, I ask the prosecutor's office to assess my activities" ??
      Moreover, whatever the political color - Nikitushko Belykh, for example.
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL April 26 2016 14: 46
        +1
        Quote: Moore
        Quote: Vladimir61
        Why are there no resignations after such appeals,

        Judge for yourself - what kind of bureaucrat in his right mind and memory will turn away from the trough on his own and proudly declare: "I did not manage, I am leaving, I ask the prosecutor's office to assess my activities" ??
        Moreover, whatever the political color

        In "early times" they even shot themselves on such occasions! ...
        Because - the bureaucracy was partly militarized: uniform, ranks, insignia ... Civil service - it was called! Serving, then, "the sovereign and the Fatherland"!
        ... Maybe to revive this business - among officials?
  25. The Voice of the Shrieker
    The Voice of the Shrieker April 26 2016 12: 21
    +2
    And this is not stupid journalism, but a purposeful provocative operation, where editors independently, or by order from the outside, launch materials in order to discredit the current economic policy of the state, and replace it with a Chubais sale of everything and everyone to figures like Browder! It’s time, obviously, to register RBC as a foreign agent
  26. Al1977
    Al1977 April 26 2016 12: 24
    0
    It is interesting to read comments. Many do not like RBC, but for some reason no one writes what media they watch?
    Why not write “I don’t read RBC, I listen to Kiselev and Solovyov as the most honest and truthful Journalists (with a capital letter). After all, everything is known in comparison. Give your top5 truthful media in our country. They talk about the real situation in the country.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL April 26 2016 14: 50
      +2
      Quote: Al1977
      Many do not like RBC, but for some reason no one writes what media they watch?
      Why not write "I don't read RBC, I listen to Kiselev and Solovyov,

      ... I, I, I!
      I watch and listen to everything - if it interests me! an element, you know, of freedom!
      But - "filter bazaar"! Believe, not believe (and analyze!) - my choice! I aggravate, so to speak, freedom of choice ...
      1. Al1977
        Al1977 April 26 2016 16: 45
        -1
        Quote: CONTROL
        Quote: Al1977
        Many do not like RBC, but for some reason no one writes what media they watch?
        Why not write "I don't read RBC, I listen to Kiselev and Solovyov,

        ... I, I, I!
        I watch and listen to everything - if it interests me! an element, you know, of freedom!
        But - "filter bazaar"! Believe, not believe (and analyze!) - my choice! I aggravate, so to speak, freedom of choice ...

        And would you like your uncle in the Kremlin to "filter the bazaar" for you, because, in their opinion, you yourself cannot ??? And then there will be nothing to filter, your task will be nodding to everything that the uncles in the Kremlin are doing, and 100500 political scientists will explain to you how ingenious all this is, and how bad it is to have a decent standard of living, and how to tighten the straps even tighter, for our enemies bother you, but what they have at home in London is enemies with ears "you know where" they want to harm you .. to YOU ​​personally. How do you like this version of the future?
    2. Rivares
      Rivares April 26 2016 17: 57
      +3
      Quote: Al1977
      It is interesting to read comments. Many do not like RBC, but for some reason no one writes what media they watch?

      They don’t like it because they are throwing mud at us, and the USA is cleaning it from dirt. But information can be obtained at RBC as well, but you just have to wash it.
  27. Al1977
    Al1977 April 26 2016 12: 32
    -3
    The first page of RBC today.
    This is not news, it’s just the enemies of the people.
    A whole U-turn in which Putin and his cunning plan are not praised.
    Close the resource, give the chief editor anathema and then shoot.
    1. arnulla
      arnulla April 26 2016 18: 15
      +2
      Thickly troll. Careful preparation ...
  28. Kelwin
    Kelwin April 26 2016 12: 53
    0
    Al1977, IMHO, it is necessary to read everything if possible. Not in the sense of everything, but in the sense of direction. Including the Unian and Reuters, and even, God forgive me, the censor)) The question of time and expense of nerve cells, but fresh chiri can clearly be seen at the fifth point of the enemy))
    Threat. As for RBC, so what else to expect from Prokhorov, a Cossack sent (c) ...
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 April 26 2016 16: 41
      -3
      Quote: KelWin
      Al1977, IMHO, it is necessary to read everything if possible. Not in the sense of everything, but in the sense of direction. Including the Unian and Reuters, and even, God forgive me, the censor)) The question of time and expense of nerve cells, but fresh chiri can clearly be seen at the fifth point of the enemy))
      Threat. As for RBC, so what else to expect from Prokhorov, a Cossack sent (c) ...

      I agree 200% that everything should be read. The question is different. If both Reuters and even, God forbid, the censor, will have one owner and submit only one point of view. Is it good. You can dislike some media, disagree with them, have favorite journalists. But only on the basis of an analysis of various things can one have a more or less accurate idea of ​​things. And what is offered to us, to exclude one point of view under the guise of "enemies of the people" and to promote a purely pro-Putin point of view, not at all popular and so on, but an absolutely pro-Kremlin point of view. What is so good about it. Okay, I can go to foreign newspapers, and ordinary people will choose between Kiselev and Solovyov. This only degrades the ability to critical analysis. Am I wrong? Even vision is so arranged, if you close one eye, it is impossible to determine the distance to the object.
      1. Kelwin
        Kelwin April 26 2016 19: 24
        0
        The use of the terms "pro-Putin" and "pro-Kremlin" in the forum dialogue works as a friend or foe identifier, IMHO. You probably misunderstood the meaning of my comment, correct it.
        1. Al1977
          Al1977 April 27 2016 11: 15
          -2
          Quote: KelWin
          The use of the terms "pro-Putin" and "pro-Kremlin" in the forum dialogue works as a friend or foe identifier, IMHO. You probably misunderstood the meaning of my comment, correct it.

          The media has long been divided into friend or foe. The whole forum here is divided into friend or foe.
          Your quote "Shl. As for RBC, so what else to expect from Prokhorov, the Cossacks, something sent (s) ..." - what is this for? Sent by whom? Sent to where? You can have some evidence of "sleepiness". Are you an FSB officer? Prosecutors? How is it that, unlike these structures, you know perfectly well who is sent and who is not?
          "fresh chirii on the fifth point of the enemy" - Are you a proctologist? Keep an eye on the fifth point of enemies for a long time. At least then tell me, who's the enemy? Whose fifth point haunts you?
          So many questions to you, dear ...
          1. Dali
            Dali April 28 2016 15: 10
            +1
            Quote: Al1977
            So many questions to you, dear ...

            And you have ... for how many silver coins you sold to mattresses ?!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Kelwin
        Kelwin April 27 2016 01: 27
        0
        Is this understood as meaningful silence? Well, let it be so. You have 4 out of 5 posts in the minuses, alas, I did not bother to look in advance, but in vain, as it turned out. You have reached lvl 35, congratulations ...
      4. The comment was deleted.
  29. Kite
    Kite April 26 2016 13: 19
    +1
    Yes, let every journalist bend his curve, if only there were arguments and do not forget about moral standards.
    Very annoying "generalists" with zero knowledge, but writing about everything is a greyhound.
  30. drilled
    drilled April 26 2016 13: 25
    +1
    Firstly, RBC is a long shout of liberals, which is surprising. Have you read RBC at all? The way of giving is a little more loyal to Echo and Rain. Second: publishing editorial text is just a mistake for admins, nothing more.
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 April 27 2016 09: 22
      0
      Quote: Burieway
      Firstly, RBC is a long shout of liberals, which is surprising. Have you read RBC at all? The way of giving is a little more loyal to Echo and Rain. Second: publishing editorial text is just a mistake for admins, nothing more.

      And what's wrong with that? And what should be the manner of presentation? Can I have an example of the sources you read?
  31. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 26 2016 16: 04
    0
    There are journalists and there are zhurnalyugi.
    Journalists are trying to bring the truth to the masses, so they do not shine with their material wealth.
    Journalists (the second oldest profession) are ready to pass off any lie as truth, actively use slander and live happily ever after, proudly carrying their bellies ...
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 April 26 2016 17: 36
      -2
      Quote: Pvi1206
      There are journalists and there are zhurnalyugi.
      Journalists are trying to bring the truth to the masses, so they do not shine with their material wealth.
      Journalists (the second oldest profession) are ready to pass off any lie as truth, actively use slander and live happily ever after, proudly carrying their bellies ...

      You specifically about whom? Solovyov? And some material goods are already lacking and they are going to the deputies of the most honest and popular party.
  32. Vladimir Vasilich
    Vladimir Vasilich April 26 2016 16: 15
    +2
    And also the titmouse-sister of our Courchevel crane, Prokhorov, is broadcasting on RBC. Her anti-Soviet and anti-Communist fervor can be envied by the entire Ukrainian pack of "feather sharks"
  33. arnulla
    arnulla April 26 2016 18: 13
    +1
    If I’m not mistaken, the Air Force channel itself admitted that it’s through RBC that they are pushing their view of events that are beneficial to them and their point of view. Therefore, RBC in this case is an agent of influence. Like Navalny
  34. japs
    japs April 26 2016 18: 49
    +6
    My father worked in journalism for 50 years. From the correspondent. to the editor. I myself grew up in the editions. What is journalism I understand. Imagine the current silkwalking as journalism, to say the least - blasphemy. In Soviet times, 99 percent. the material was pure truth. 1 percent - was a silence and a challenge, but not a lie! Now 99 percent. - empty chatter and frankly paid by the customer lie. Who pays, he dances a girl of 2 ancient professions. Minus to blue.
    There are very few real journalists, those who are not afraid to express their opinions. The rest are fed by the media.
    An example of freedom of speech is Wasserman.
    An example of free speech in the West is the criminal prosecution of the truth about the Jewish Lochocaust.
  35. Own
    Own April 26 2016 19: 51
    -4
    A lot about the fact that the media distort, misrepresent. And the competence of the VO team is shown in the first sentence of the article. The fact is that the forum was not held in Mordovia, but in Mariika (Mari El Republic)
  36. esaul1950
    esaul1950 April 26 2016 21: 41
    0
    Journalists are worse than prostitutes, they infect the body, and journalists poison the soul!
  37. TT-33
    TT-33 April 26 2016 22: 52
    +3
    Quote: Rivares
    Quote: Nikolai K
    In our country, 90% of the media is either state-owned or controlled by Putin’s friends.

    Nikolay, wait a minute, and the fact that 90% of the media in the world is either state or controlled by the State Department doesn’t bother you ??
    And fairy tales about independent media are not necessary. All media are addicted. And recently, it has become fashionable to call the enemy media independent.


    To the very point !!!
  38. Weyland
    Weyland April 26 2016 23: 34
    +2
    I remembered:
    - "Can you lie?" the major asked me.
    - "You know better," I replied: "it's my profession! "(R. Kipling; who does not know - he started as a journalist, and the above dialogue refers precisely to the journalistic period of his life.)
  39. Kelwin
    Kelwin April 27 2016 04: 15
    +1
    What's there, RBC, zhurnalyugi, useful infa, fresh pearl about German NPP:

    "Viruses" W32.Ramnit "and" Conficker "were found in the computer system of block B. In addition, the malware was found on 8 removable drives, mainly USB-drives, in office computers that are not connected to station operating system."
    полностью http://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/571fe7689a794714a706f07b

    I'll go chop off the fridge from porch operating systemotherwise evil viruses will kill all the beer ... mom, take me away from here))
    1. Come on
      Come on April 27 2016 04: 47
      0
      Why cool something? Before a disaster at a nuclear power plant, it is easy to finish badly with a dangerous virus. And your banter about the refrigerator is actually a reality, since there are already refrigerators with Wi-Fi, or an Internet connection. Such a refrigerator orders products itself, when they run out, you just need to enter a list. And just imagine, you have such a refrigerator and you use this function. Here an evil hacker, or his vile program "pivanet.hehe" took and removed your beer from the next order !!! You come home from work, open the fridge .. and there bam! and no beer! No beer !!! There are cabbage, tomato, sausages, but no beer !!! belay
      1. Kelwin
        Kelwin April 27 2016 06: 43
        +1
        Nothing cool at all. The banter was about the literate expression "the operating system of the station", well, and also on little things ... And it's good to scare people, these worms, not viruses, never, brought secretaries on flash drives, well, they'll drop the office LAN at most, and then if the admin is stupid unicellular, which is really not excluded, otherwise where are there flash drives in general.
        Getting to the technological network is more difficult than pushing the bonbu into the GO. At this moment, only the Flame complex is known, which was caught in Iran at an enrichment plant. The complexity of this thing is such that all Windows \ Nyxes are resting, but again, this is a specialized thing, it will only work. So if we talk about the likelihood of a serious accident, the first in the queue will be an administrative jamb. Look, in 404 they already said about 30% of the fuel from the news, how the service is carried out the same xs, give money or whatever ...
        Yes, in the refrigerator ... you need to go for beer with your legs, it is healthier for health, otherwise you are lazy. That's when it will be possible to download half a liter from the Internet, then yes, you can talk about something drinks
  40. Lekov L
    Lekov L April 27 2016 16: 14
    0
    On the eve of Vladimir Putin during the forum of the All-Russian Popular Front in Mordovia made fun of the journalistic profession. One of the participants of the forum was going to ask a question to the President of Russia, and he asked about her occupation.
    “Journalist,” she replied, adding: “And she was a teacher.”


    Here the author of this article is definitely not a fig was a teacher of geography, because on the eve of the ONF forum was not held Saransk (Mordovia), and in Yoshkar-Ola (Mari El).
    That's it.
    therefore all further author’s ismyshlisms confirm only that Putin is right!
    Have you been a teacher? Did you become a journalist? What a fall ...

    Apologies for GDP say only that he is a polite person.
    All with respect, who read this remark. wink
  41. bk316
    bk316 April 27 2016 19: 21
    +2
    Once upon a time a rebbe could be read and the forum was nothing.
    Then they began to post photos that were not related to the text - such as an article about s-300 and poplar in the photo.
    Then, after a time, they began to confuse meters with kilometers.
    Then they began to make grammatical mistakes.
    Then the articles became biased.
    Then the forum hammered inadvertently hamsters.
    Then the forum was closed.
    And then they just started writing nonsense.
  42. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam April 28 2016 09: 32
    0
    The fact that articles appear about media responsibility is already good. Although this article cannot be praised for an in-depth study of the material. RBC and the experts involved are positioning themselves as liberals, and based on this article it is clear that their liberalism is bloated, because there is economic primitivism and stupid adherence to Western pseudo-liberalism, whose goal is to turn a thinking person into a primitive consumer.
  43. Erg
    Erg April 28 2016 09: 40
    +1
    At RBC, I have skip. And no problem. I advise everyone smile
  44. Mairos
    Mairos April 28 2016 16: 02
    +1
    Quote: Vadim the Skeptic
    And what you wanted is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. EVERYONE has the RIGHT to express their opinion. Hence the FREE MEDIA.

    Media is not free! Do you believe in this tale? They are either public and express the point of view of the state, or private and express the position of their direct owner or group of owners.
  45. Aristide
    Aristide April 28 2016 16: 43
    0
    "Come on quickly, by herself, by herself ...", - the train conductor (N. Mikhalkov) encouraged the waitress of the railway station restaurant (L. Gurchenko) in the film "Station for Two". Apparently, everyone switched to self-service.