Construction of the third "Cheetah" for the Vietnamese Navy is being completed in Tatarstan

OAO Zelenodolsk Plant named after A.M. Gorky "completes the construction of the guard ship" Cheetah-3.9 "for the Vietnamese Navy, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the enterprise.

"April 27 frigate will be launched to conduct sea trials," - said in a statement.

According to the representative of the plant, Andrei Spiridonov, the Vietnamese delegation will take part in the ceremony.

“Representatives of Vietnam have arrived today, they will participate in the launching of the ship into the water, representatives of Rosoboronexport are also expected,” Spiridonov said.

The press service noted that "in 2011, the plant supplied the Vietnamese Navy with the first two frigates" Cheetah-3.9 ", after which a contract was signed for two more ships." At present, the fourth frigate is being completed.

Enterprise Reference: "The frigates of the project 11661 (code" Cheetah ") are designed to perform tasks such as fighting the air, underwater and surface enemy; coverage of the surface and underwater situation, setting active and passive interference; minefield setting; escorting and guarding convoys; patrolling the state border and economic zone. The ships with a displacement of about 2200 t are equipped with modern missile and artillery and radio weapons, as well as mine and anti-sabotage weapons».

Comments

[AFG-X]

Your navy would be satiated first.

[Wiruz]

His ships do not need such ships, thank God! Corvettes pr.20380 and they will be more powerful, God grant them normal SU!

[kepmor]

Do not spew stupidity!
There are only 6 IPCs left on the Northern Fleet, of which only 3 are actually combat-ready and "on the move" !!! There is not a single TFR, and there are no more combat-ready minesweepers 5-6!
"Krandets" complete with the coastal zone crew - OVR!
And for the protection of the coastal zone ships with "Calibers" are not needed in FIG - the tasks are not the same, but the "Cheetahs" are simply vital!

[Volzhanin2]

Quote: AFG-X

Your navy would be satiated first.

Well, after the Caspian flotilla fired calibers in Syria, I think many are scratching their turnips and revising the concept of their Navy. The process is going well and it’s not publicized. It is pleasant for our opponents to present "surprises".
NATO already resent our submarines, such as resumed campaigns and activity.
The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.
And we must be aware that geographically we are not particularly dependent on the fleet, and our coastal complexes are excellent, the supply of mainland and sea blockade is not particularly threatening to us.
We don’t need to throw money away for "so that it will be like the others" and indulge our ambitions, we have where to invest without that.

[Wiruz]

The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.

Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.

[Muvka]

Quote: Wiruz

The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.

Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.

I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?

[Wiruz]

I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?

You know, a rocket, in order to sink a ship, you need to at least reach it.
There has long been debate about whether the US Navy is capable of shooting down our supersonic anti-ship missiles flying at extremely low altitudes. Urya-patriots say they are not capable, because once upon a time, the Americans themselves, in the exercises to intercept RCC, screwed up in full. Then a subsonic target rocket punched a hole in the hull of a Ticonderoga-class cruiser.
But you know, do not underestimate the enemy. In the same way, one should not think that on the other side of the ocean some ignoramuses live.

[Muvka]

Quote: Wiruz

I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?

You know, a rocket, in order to sink a ship, you need to at least reach it.
There has long been debate about whether the US Navy is capable of shooting down our supersonic anti-ship missiles flying at extremely low altitudes. Urya-patriots say they are not capable, because once upon a time, the Americans themselves, in the exercises to intercept RCC, screwed up in full. Then a subsonic target rocket punched a hole in the hull of a Ticonderoga-class cruiser.
But you know, do not underestimate the enemy. In the same way, one should not think that on the other side of the ocean some ignoramuses live.

I think there is not so much a problem to bring down, how much to detect.

[mav1971]

Quote: Muvka

I think there is not so much a problem to bring down, how much to detect.

The answer was too long.
In two parts.
part1


To be able to launch a rocket that flies to a target at an extremely low altitude and at a speed of 2-3М, you need to launch it from a distance of not more than 150 kilometers. Further, all known missiles in such modes do not fly.
Accordingly, the medium must come to such a distance.

The biggest misfortune of the Russians is to think everyone is dumber than themselves.
If to myself personally - then the neighbor is always dumber.
If about the nation, then other nations are always dumber.
And they are not dumber.

They clearly understand what an aircraft carrier is.
How much it costs, how much crew it has, what it can and most importantly - what are its weak points.
They built them in hundreds, drowned in dozens. dozens themselves lost. In general, everyone knows about them.
We do not know anything. Just a blank page in our knowledge book.

It must be understood that an aircraft carrier worth tens of billions of dollars and with 5 thousands of crew must be layered to defend.

And at the first stage of defense there are satellites.
They, in providing aircraft carriers - are immeasurable.
And species, and RTR and communications, etc.
They control all movements for a thousand miles around the aircraft carrier. Almost in real time. For them, I repeat, is immeasurable.

Then comes the middle circle. Hokai and Viking. Hokai is always (24 hours a day) in the air, like a pair of SuperHornets with AMRAAM.
Distance detection of any target up to 600 kilometers from the aircraft carrier.
Well, a small circle. 6-8 Berkov + Tiki. 1-2 APL
Do not forget to regularly follow the route of coastal aircraft P-3, P-8, E-8, E-3, RC-135.

Accordingly, to approach, fly up to the launch range with the obligatory initial target designation of a supersonic missile by surface forces - unnoticed is unrealistic. They will control every step. And the launch will definitely be determined and the flight of the rocket will be fully controlled.
Missile launch without target designation is nonsense. Fantasy.

[almost demobil]

mav1971
Let's just remember "Donald Cook" and the old Su-24. The scale is certainly not the same, but it is very significant. Simply put, in a serious conflict, AK-47 and TA-57 rule.

[almost demobil]

Quote: mav1971

Just do not carry that nonsense. about diapers and stuff ...
That feeling. that every d.b.i.l. of this country repeats as a mantra his fantasy about cook and su-24 ...

You, dear comrade, are just a boor and you are not on this site.

[mav1971]

Quote: almost demob

You, dear comrade, are just a boor and you are not on this site.

On a military-themed site, there is no place for people like you!
Stupid, lazy, incapable of analyzing information to people.
They do not understand anything either in technology or in methods of application.
Not able to find sources of information, with great fanfare and pleasure repeating stupidity from time to time.

Those who gag on the topic and without the topic, their favorite phrase is "cut".
Enchanting, simple, d ...
See Downhouse - it's about you ...


There are normal people on the site who argue at least for something - they are worthy of respect, such as you are worthless of respect, nothing.
It’s for you to get away from here.

[almost demobil]

Quote: mav1971

On a military-themed site, there is no place for people like you!
Stupid, lazy, incapable of analyzing information to people.
They do not understand anything either in technology or in methods of application.
Not able to find sources of information, with great fanfare and pleasure repeating stupidity from time to time.

Those who gag on the topic and without the topic, their favorite phrase is "cut".
Enchanting, simple, d ...
See Downhouse - it's about you ...

Why are you insulting, are you completely inadequate? You are probably often offended in life, maybe even beat? So you are rude on the site? Once again, I suggest you calm down, everyone has their own opinion, someone like you is picking your finger on Google, someone has information from other sources.
Judging by "1971" you are no longer a boy, behave yourself.

[mav1971]

Quote: almost demob

Judging by "1971" you are no longer a boy, behave yourself.

Am I at a lecture?
And should listen to the teacher?
Behave with dignity?

If yes, then explain to me why you behave illiterate, moreover, revel in this illiteracy in all directions ???
Loud, so that everyone would hear?
You carry nonsense, repeat from time to time, the same complete nonsense?
Why should normal people read this all the time?
I don’t care, I’m not very educated, I can express everything I think ...
I'm sorry that other, really worthy and knowledgeable people, with logic, a working brain, and really have real knowledge, leave the audience of this site, in view of the general and mindless shouting and "cutting" ...
And you have to read one or two normal posts - to read a thousand dull seals that have neither meaning nor truth.
And I do not want to waste my time on you. I want to read them.
Do you understand?
Nothing to do here!
If you really want to shout "For the Motherland" - learn English and do it on American forums, maybe it will be useful ...
Let us here "disassemble" our own and other people's technique with reason, and not "all the winners of the fashionable left" ...

[oblako]

All of you are right. We also understand what an aircraft carrier with its defense lines is. And if we plan to destroy such a unit, then we will not start from the 3rd defense circle ... The whole question is that not every country can extinguish space, the enemy’s AWACS aircraft. But with countries that cannot do this, carrier formations work efficiently. Control every step you say? Nu-nu ... Pavos of course, but quite real.

[mav1971]

Part 2



Remains a melt.
Who has a chance of a hidden rocket launch.
But.
For the rocket to gain marching speed, it rises to a minimum of 300 meters. And most likely from 500 and higher. Then dropping.
and here even Burke finds her.
And from Hokai hanging on 10 kilometers, she can’t hide at all - in the palm of her hand.

Due to the fact that the entire fleet and its components are equipped with the Link-16 system, it is Hokai who starts firing rockets with air defense warrants at the moment when he saw the mark on the radar. He leads a missile, directs missiles at it, and also gives target designation to the Phalanxes.
Due to the full integration of Link-16 and Aegis, three dozen missiles can be fired at the same time. Perhaps even on board the SuperKhornet will be the launch of AMRAAM.

This is about active defense.
We do not indicate the electronic warfare means that such an order can create ... Here, too, the AFAR with their high-power point radiation is exactly on a missile. And just a colossal cloud of dipoles that 8 ships can sketch.
At the extreme, some Burke will probably always be on the flight path of the rocket and can take it upon itself.

An aircraft carrier is so expensive that its defenses are many times greater than the usual means of attack.

and why the theme of aircraft carriers is moving so with a creak.
And that is precisely why.
This nifiga is not 10 billion dollars to spend. They would have long been found and spent and built.
But it would be a barge with airplanes.


It is necessary to build a huge group of upscale satellites providing aircraft carrier for tens of billions of dollars.
it is necessary to build a group of destroyers and cruisers providing the aircraft carrier for tens of billions of dollars.
We need to build billions of dollars of support vessels providing the aircraft carrier.
It is necessary to build billions of dollars of carrier-based AWACS, PLO, REB / RTR aircraft, as well as coastal AWACS, PLO, REB / RTR aircraft and tankers for them.
And in the end, a smart person understands that an aircraft carrier is a whole infrastructure worth trillions of dollars ...

Therefore, before demanding aircraft carriers from Putin, one must understand that without all of the above, it’s just a barge.
Carriers didn’t make fools. and use.

A missile type Caliber, generally harmless to aircraft carriers. For there is nothing in them. Papuans like ISIS to drive ...

[musorg]

Yes, you’re my friend a strategist! Where did you serve that?

[vv3]

Mav1971, I would like to shake your hand ... We and the earth have the same picture with information support and target designation in real time, I tried to raise this issue - Uryat’s trolley at every step.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Muvka

one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough

And ballistic missiles will fly. What's next?

[Muvka]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: Muvka

one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough

And ballistic missiles will fly. What's next?

Here it’s more correct to ask why it happened that we were forced to sink an aircraft carrier.

[Dart2027]

I’m having a hard time, but I can imagine a situation where, after a direct battle with the Navy of a NATO country, it will be possible to avoid universal annihilation, but I don’t believe for nothing that this will be possible after the use of nuclear weapons. Though tactical, at least some, but a chain reaction will begin.

[Alex777]

On Petra there are 4 such, at least, at each exit ...

[Volzhanin2]

I don’t want another srach about the need for aircraft carriers. About drowning them, the Americans generally have a ridiculous argument !!! Americans didn’t fight serious opponents after WWII, who could drown them? And what types of ships did the Americans destroy?
Peter the First did a lot of ambiguous things, it was good, but there was also enough dope with forced planting of coffee and tobacco.
From myself I’ll say: it’s not enough to build, maintain is much more expensive. It was already built and put on needles and not only ships, but Buran can be remembered.
It's like giving Maybach to a public sector employee, starting starving first, and then selling it anyway.

[Wiruz]

[quote Peter the First did a lot of ambiguous things, it was good, but dope with forced planting of coffee and smoking was also enough.]