Military Review

Construction of the third "Cheetah" for the Vietnamese Navy is being completed in Tatarstan

44
OAO Zelenodolsk Plant named after A.M. Gorky "completes the construction of the guard ship" Cheetah-3.9 "for the Vietnamese Navy, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the enterprise.




"April 27 frigate will be launched to conduct sea trials," - said in a statement.

According to the representative of the plant, Andrei Spiridonov, the Vietnamese delegation will take part in the ceremony.

“Representatives of Vietnam have arrived today, they will participate in the launching of the ship into the water, representatives of Rosoboronexport are also expected,” Spiridonov said.

The press service noted that "in 2011, the plant supplied the Vietnamese Navy with the first two frigates" Cheetah-3.9 ", after which a contract was signed for two more ships." At present, the fourth frigate is being completed.

Enterprise Reference: "The frigates of the project 11661 (code" Cheetah ") are designed to perform tasks such as fighting the air, underwater and surface enemy; coverage of the surface and underwater situation, setting active and passive interference; minefield setting; escorting and guarding convoys; patrolling the state border and economic zone. The ships with a displacement of about 2200 t are equipped with modern missile and artillery and radio weapons, as well as mine and anti-sabotage weapons».
Photos used:
OAO Zelenodolsk Plant named after A.M. Gorky "
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. AFG-X
    AFG-X April 25 2016 18: 24
    0
    Your navy would be satiated first.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 27
      +12
      His ships do not need such ships, thank God! Corvettes pr.20380 and they will be more powerful, God grant them normal SU! yes
      1. kepmor
        kepmor April 26 2016 08: 42
        +2
        Do not spew stupidity!
        There are only 6 IPCs left on the Northern Fleet, of which only 3 are actually combat-ready and "on the move" !!! There is not a single TFR, and there are no more combat-ready minesweepers 5-6!
        "Krandets" complete with the coastal zone crew - OVR!
        And for the protection of the coastal zone ships with "Calibers" are not needed in FIG - the tasks are not the same, but the "Cheetahs" are simply vital!
    2. Volzhanin2
      Volzhanin2 April 25 2016 18: 30
      +17
      Quote: AFG-X
      Your navy would be satiated first.

      Well, after the Caspian flotilla fired calibers in Syria, I think many are scratching their turnips and revising the concept of their Navy. The process is going well and it’s not publicized. It is pleasant for our opponents to present "surprises".
      NATO already resent our submarines, such as resumed campaigns and activity.
      The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.
      And we must be aware that geographically we are not particularly dependent on the fleet, and our coastal complexes are excellent, the supply of mainland and sea blockade is not particularly threatening to us.
      We don’t need to throw money away for "so that it will be like the others" and indulge our ambitions, we have where to invest without that.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 43
        +5
        The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.

        Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 25 2016 18: 47
          -2
          Quote: Wiruz
          The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.

          Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.

          I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz April 25 2016 19: 01
            +15
            I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?

            You know, a rocket, in order to sink a ship, you need to at least reach it.
            There has long been debate about whether the US Navy is capable of shooting down our supersonic anti-ship missiles flying at extremely low altitudes. Urya-patriots say they are not capable, because once upon a time, the Americans themselves, in the exercises to intercept RCC, screwed up in full. Then a subsonic target rocket punched a hole in the hull of a Ticonderoga-class cruiser.
            But you know, do not underestimate the enemy. In the same way, one should not think that on the other side of the ocean some ignoramuses live.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka April 25 2016 19: 05
              -2
              Quote: Wiruz
              I think one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough to destroy the nose. Enlighten, who knows, we carry such things on ships?

              You know, a rocket, in order to sink a ship, you need to at least reach it.
              There has long been debate about whether the US Navy is capable of shooting down our supersonic anti-ship missiles flying at extremely low altitudes. Urya-patriots say they are not capable, because once upon a time, the Americans themselves, in the exercises to intercept RCC, screwed up in full. Then a subsonic target rocket punched a hole in the hull of a Ticonderoga-class cruiser.
              But you know, do not underestimate the enemy. In the same way, one should not think that on the other side of the ocean some ignoramuses live.

              I think there is not so much a problem to bring down, how much to detect.
              1. mav1971
                mav1971 April 25 2016 21: 46
                +1
                Quote: Muvka

                I think there is not so much a problem to bring down, how much to detect.


                The answer was too long.
                In two parts.
                part1


                To be able to launch a rocket that flies to a target at an extremely low altitude and at a speed of 2-3М, you need to launch it from a distance of not more than 150 kilometers. Further, all known missiles in such modes do not fly.
                Accordingly, the medium must come to such a distance.

                The biggest misfortune of the Russians is to think everyone is dumber than themselves.
                If to myself personally - then the neighbor is always dumber.
                If about the nation, then other nations are always dumber.
                And they are not dumber.

                They clearly understand what an aircraft carrier is.
                How much it costs, how much crew it has, what it can and most importantly - what are its weak points.
                They built them in hundreds, drowned in dozens. dozens themselves lost. In general, everyone knows about them.
                We do not know anything. Just a blank page in our knowledge book.

                It must be understood that an aircraft carrier worth tens of billions of dollars and with 5 thousands of crew must be layered to defend.

                And at the first stage of defense there are satellites.
                They, in providing aircraft carriers - are immeasurable.
                And species, and RTR and communications, etc.
                They control all movements for a thousand miles around the aircraft carrier. Almost in real time. For them, I repeat, is immeasurable.

                Then comes the middle circle. Hokai and Viking. Hokai is always (24 hours a day) in the air, like a pair of SuperHornets with AMRAAM.
                Distance detection of any target up to 600 kilometers from the aircraft carrier.
                Well, a small circle. 6-8 Berkov + Tiki. 1-2 APL
                Do not forget to regularly follow the route of coastal aircraft P-3, P-8, E-8, E-3, RC-135.

                Accordingly, to approach, fly up to the launch range with the obligatory initial target designation of a supersonic missile by surface forces - unnoticed is unrealistic. They will control every step. And the launch will definitely be determined and the flight of the rocket will be fully controlled.
                Missile launch without target designation is nonsense. Fantasy.
                1. almost demobil
                  almost demobil April 26 2016 04: 27
                  -5
                  mav1971
                  Let's just remember "Donald Cook" and the old Su-24. The scale is certainly not the same, but it is very significant. Simply put, in a serious conflict, AK-47 and TA-57 rule. smile
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. almost demobil
                      almost demobil April 26 2016 12: 36
                      -3
                      Quote: mav1971
                      Just do not carry that nonsense. about diapers and stuff ...
                      That feeling. that every d.b.i.l. of this country repeats as a mantra his fantasy about cook and su-24 ...

                      You, dear comrade, are just a boor and you are not on this site.
                      1. mav1971
                        mav1971 April 26 2016 13: 35
                        +1
                        Quote: almost demob

                        You, dear comrade, are just a boor and you are not on this site.


                        On a military-themed site, there is no place for people like you!
                        Stupid, lazy, incapable of analyzing information to people.
                        They do not understand anything either in technology or in methods of application.
                        Not able to find sources of information, with great fanfare and pleasure repeating stupidity from time to time.

                        Those who gag on the topic and without the topic, their favorite phrase is "cut".
                        Enchanting, simple, d ...
                        See Downhouse - it's about you ...


                        There are normal people on the site who argue at least for something - they are worthy of respect, such as you are worthless of respect, nothing.
                        It’s for you to get away from here.
                      2. almost demobil
                        almost demobil April 26 2016 13: 54
                        -1
                        Quote: mav1971
                        On a military-themed site, there is no place for people like you!
                        Stupid, lazy, incapable of analyzing information to people.
                        They do not understand anything either in technology or in methods of application.
                        Not able to find sources of information, with great fanfare and pleasure repeating stupidity from time to time.

                        Those who gag on the topic and without the topic, their favorite phrase is "cut".
                        Enchanting, simple, d ...
                        See Downhouse - it's about you ...

                        Why are you insulting, are you completely inadequate? You are probably often offended in life, maybe even beat? So you are rude on the site? Once again, I suggest you calm down, everyone has their own opinion, someone like you is picking your finger on Google, someone has information from other sources.
                        Judging by "1971" you are no longer a boy, behave yourself.
                      3. mav1971
                        mav1971 April 26 2016 17: 17
                        0
                        Quote: almost demob

                        Judging by "1971" you are no longer a boy, behave yourself.


                        Am I at a lecture?
                        And should listen to the teacher?
                        Behave with dignity?

                        If yes, then explain to me why you behave illiterate, moreover, revel in this illiteracy in all directions ???
                        Loud, so that everyone would hear?
                        You carry nonsense, repeat from time to time, the same complete nonsense?
                        Why should normal people read this all the time?
                        I don’t care, I’m not very educated, I can express everything I think ...
                        I'm sorry that other, really worthy and knowledgeable people, with logic, a working brain, and really have real knowledge, leave the audience of this site, in view of the general and mindless shouting and "cutting" ...
                        And you have to read one or two normal posts - to read a thousand dull seals that have neither meaning nor truth.
                        And I do not want to waste my time on you. I want to read them.
                        Do you understand?
                        Nothing to do here!
                        If you really want to shout "For the Motherland" - learn English and do it on American forums, maybe it will be useful ...
                        Let us here "disassemble" our own and other people's technique with reason, and not "all the winners of the fashionable left" ...
            2. oblako
              oblako April 26 2016 12: 22
              +1
              All of you are right. We also understand what an aircraft carrier with its defense lines is. And if we plan to destroy such a unit, then we will not start from the 3rd defense circle ... The whole question is that not every country can extinguish space, the enemy’s AWACS aircraft. But with countries that cannot do this, carrier formations work efficiently. Control every step you say? Nu-nu ... Pavos of course, but quite real.
          2. mav1971
            mav1971 April 25 2016 21: 48
            +1
            Part 2



            Remains a melt.
            Who has a chance of a hidden rocket launch.
            But.
            For the rocket to gain marching speed, it rises to a minimum of 300 meters. And most likely from 500 and higher. Then dropping.
            and here even Burke finds her.
            And from Hokai hanging on 10 kilometers, she can’t hide at all - in the palm of her hand.

            Due to the fact that the entire fleet and its components are equipped with the Link-16 system, it is Hokai who starts firing rockets with air defense warrants at the moment when he saw the mark on the radar. He leads a missile, directs missiles at it, and also gives target designation to the Phalanxes.
            Due to the full integration of Link-16 and Aegis, three dozen missiles can be fired at the same time. Perhaps even on board the SuperKhornet will be the launch of AMRAAM.

            This is about active defense.
            We do not indicate the electronic warfare means that such an order can create ... Here, too, the AFAR with their high-power point radiation is exactly on a missile. And just a colossal cloud of dipoles that 8 ships can sketch.
            At the extreme, some Burke will probably always be on the flight path of the rocket and can take it upon itself.

            An aircraft carrier is so expensive that its defenses are many times greater than the usual means of attack.

            and why the theme of aircraft carriers is moving so with a creak.
            And that is precisely why.
            This nifiga is not 10 billion dollars to spend. They would have long been found and spent and built.
            But it would be a barge with airplanes.


            It is necessary to build a huge group of upscale satellites providing aircraft carrier for tens of billions of dollars.
            it is necessary to build a group of destroyers and cruisers providing the aircraft carrier for tens of billions of dollars.
            We need to build billions of dollars of support vessels providing the aircraft carrier.
            It is necessary to build billions of dollars of carrier-based AWACS, PLO, REB / RTR aircraft, as well as coastal AWACS, PLO, REB / RTR aircraft and tankers for them.
            And in the end, a smart person understands that an aircraft carrier is a whole infrastructure worth trillions of dollars ...

            Therefore, before demanding aircraft carriers from Putin, one must understand that without all of the above, it’s just a barge.
            Carriers didn’t make fools. and use.

            A missile type Caliber, generally harmless to aircraft carriers. For there is nothing in them. Papuans like ISIS to drive ...
            1. musorg
              musorg April 26 2016 13: 16
              +2
              Yes, you’re my friend a strategist! Where did you serve that?
            2. vv3
              vv3 April 26 2016 14: 27
              0
              Mav1971, I would like to shake your hand ... We and the earth have the same picture with information support and target designation in real time, I tried to raise this issue - Uryat’s trolley at every step.
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 April 25 2016 19: 06
        +2
        Quote: Muvka
        one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough

        And ballistic missiles will fly. What's next?
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 25 2016 19: 16
          0
          Quote: Dart2027
          Quote: Muvka
          one tactical missile with a nuclear warhead is enough

          And ballistic missiles will fly. What's next?

          Here it’s more correct to ask why it happened that we were forced to sink an aircraft carrier.
          1. Dart2027
            Dart2027 April 25 2016 20: 34
            +4
            I’m having a hard time, but I can imagine a situation where, after a direct battle with the Navy of a NATO country, it will be possible to avoid universal annihilation, but I don’t believe for nothing that this will be possible after the use of nuclear weapons. Though tactical, at least some, but a chain reaction will begin.
      3. Alex777
        Alex777 April 25 2016 22: 40
        0
        On Petra there are 4 such, at least, at each exit ...
    3. Volzhanin2
      Volzhanin2 April 25 2016 18: 48
      +6
      I don’t want another srach about the need for aircraft carriers. About drowning them, the Americans generally have a ridiculous argument !!! Americans didn’t fight serious opponents after WWII, who could drown them? And what types of ships did the Americans destroy?
      Peter the First did a lot of ambiguous things, it was good, but there was also enough dope with forced planting of coffee and tobacco.
      From myself I’ll say: it’s not enough to build, maintain is much more expensive. It was already built and put on needles and not only ships, but Buran can be remembered.
      It's like giving Maybach to a public sector employee, starting starving first, and then selling it anyway.
      1. [comment-show]
        Wiruz
        Wiruz April 25 2016 19: 03
        -1
        [quote Peter the First did a lot of ambiguous things, it was good, but dope with forced planting of coffee and smoking was also enough.]

        Right! Now that they will blame me for the abuse of coffee and tobacco, I’ll push everything on Peter laughing
        [/ comment-show] [comment-deleted]
        The comment was deleted.
        [/ comment-deleted]
  1. [comment-show]
    Volzhanin2
    Volzhanin2 April 25 2016 19: 09
    0
    Quote: Wiruz
    [quote Peter the First did a lot of ambiguous things, it was good, but dope with forced planting of coffee and smoking was also enough.]

    Right! Now that they will blame me for the abuse of coffee and tobacco, I’ll push everything on Peter laughing

    Well, since such a booze went:
    [/ comment-show] [comment-deleted]
    The comment was deleted.
    [/ comment-deleted]
  • Ride78
    Ride78 April 25 2016 21: 31
    0
    I have a dvenashka, I have enough. I would like it better, but no money. And I would immediately sell the maybach, fuck it to me) It’s better to buy and rent several apartments, all the extra income to the family budget)))
  • almost demobil
    almost demobil April 26 2016 04: 21
    0
    Quote: Wiruz
    Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.

    So far, they have fought against the "Papuans". The mattress mats are full of weapons to fight against weak states, remember, for example, gunship. But when the enemy has something to bang, then the question of usefulness will be very relevant. By the way, in order to disable the aircraft carrier, I repeat, not to sink, but to disable it, one tablet is enough for take-off, or damage the steam catapult. And we have tablets - be healthy!
  • iliitchitch
    iliitchitch April 25 2016 19: 01
    +3
    Quote: AFG-X
    Your navy would be satiated first.


    Five hundred aircraft carriers, seven hundred submarines, "and something else, but what would be beautiful", so what?
    The principle of reasonable sufficiency is not familiar? How much does one small torpedo boat eat per day? Literally, crisp money, including the sailor's expenses for a "chip"?
    We will soon fill the pentagon with the very tomatoes, their head will be sore from 10-15 years from our Navy underwater, and then again 10-15 ... Will the surface fleet be a means of attack and intimidation, is this the task before us? We observe a minimum, scare the Papuans. If floating islands begin to build behind a puddle - this is an excuse to head on. for an asymmetric answer, not for an answer.
  • Arkhan
    Arkhan April 25 2016 19: 52
    0
    I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
    You decide what to do with it.
  • Ride78
    Ride78 April 25 2016 21: 28
    0
    That's honestly better to do 22350 for yourself. At least 4 for each fleet would be powerful.
  • Dam
    Dam April 26 2016 02: 32
    +1
    I don’t know why you are being minus. If cheetahs are not for us, then the free shipyards are clearly not enough. In the air it just stinks of war and we really need weapons right now.
  • musorg
    musorg April 26 2016 13: 10
    0
    They handed over one admiral, but did he seem to hang somewhere?
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 25 2016 18: 24
    -4
    Well, yes, Vietnam needs it, but we ourselves can manage it, we are not used to it.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 26
      +6
      Well let's tell nakoy us such ships?
      Enrages are all-encompassing, who perceive the construction of ships for export almost as treason angry
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 April 26 2016 08: 05
        +1
        Well, you have long been sold out everything that remained in Ukraine, now you are pulling equipment from the Chernobyl zone into the ATO zone. Your army is the strongest in the whole galaxy. hi
  • oleg-gr
    oleg-gr April 25 2016 18: 24
    0
    Good service to the ship. Let advertise the Russian defense industry.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 33
      +2
      In an interview, the head of the Zelenodolsk plant said that Vientham is considering the acquisition of a couple more of these ships. At the same time, it is highly likely that on the fifth and sixth ships, instead of Uraniums with X-35, the UKKS with Caliber will be installed. The only problem is the Ukrainian engine ...
  • siberalt
    siberalt April 25 2016 18: 27
    +1
    Vietnam has one potential enemy - China. Moreover, the threat does not come from them. Hence the meaning of reviving our base to Cam Ranh is stuck. China and America are tough against it. And the fact that we are selling our weapons to all those who "licked" is a temporary and forced circumstance, but in the future it does not promise anything good for the world. This applies to all other arms dealers.
  • Приговор
    Приговор April 25 2016 18: 29
    +1
    Good luck to Zelenodoltsy! More high-tech orders requiring the latest equipment and highly qualified specialists! Then we will have our own ships. Well done guys! Earn money for yourself and for the country.
  • Teberii
    Teberii April 25 2016 18: 29
    +2
    Most likely, this is an option for implementation abroad. For us, completely different ships are going.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 36
      +1
      Google to help you! We have such ships as many as two: one (Tatarstan) with the X-35, the second (Dagestan) has already fired two calibers at the Ishilov’s.
      But we don’t need such ships anymore - not the most successful project.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. siberalt
        siberalt April 25 2016 18: 43
        +1
        Just don't scare it with Google. Any reference to it, without context and links to competent sources, betrays a half-educated layman. Something like this. I wish you good health!hi
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 48
          -2
          gives out a profane dropout. Something like this. I wish you hello!

          It seems to me or they just politely insulted me ??? ... belay
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. siberalt
            siberalt April 25 2016 19: 18
            0
            There is a saying - a hat burns on a thief. But this is not about you. If "hooked", I apologize. I, in fact, about the attitude towards Ghul as such laughing
      3. gispanec
        gispanec April 25 2016 20: 25
        0
        Quote: Wiruz
        But we don’t need such ships anymore - not the most successful project.

        can you clarify why he is not successful ??? ... enlighten please be kind ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter April 25 2016 18: 45
    +1
    Well, all is well, but why is Tatarstan building? Is he not Russia? It’s not worth it, IMHO, even gradually, to excite the national theme. We are all Russians, and all our achievements are common.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 25 2016 18: 51
      +2
      Well, if the construction was carried out at Severnaya Verf, would you not be satisfied with the phrase "in St. Petersburg"? winked
      Tatarstan is the same subject of the Russian Federation as the rest. Calling entities by name is not a crime.
  • LÄRZ
    LÄRZ April 25 2016 18: 47
    +3
    Everything is correct. Let them build and sell. And money for them can be sent to other places, at least here:
    The construction of patrol ships of the 11356 project at the Yantar Kaliningrad plant is currently frozen due to a halt in military-technical cooperation with Ukraine. Engines for ships were produced by the Zorya-Mashproekt plant, located in Nikolaev. The Rybinsk NPO Saturn needs at least two years to create a Russian analogue of the engine. The frigates Admiral Butakov, Admiral Istomin and Admiral Kornilov remain unfinished.
    http://www.aif.ru/dontknows/file/chto_predstavlyaet_soboy_rossiyskiy_storozhevoy
    _korabl_admiral_essen
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 25 2016 19: 39
      0
      They confuse different types of engines. For 11356, no one is even going to launch turbine production. This is stupid, impractical. Three ships, nowhere more under construction and planned, such turbines will not be used. Moreover, the installation of the past generation (or rather 70h).

      Build on NPO Saturn afterburner M-90FR turbine - it has 27,5к hp power and is used only occasionally, when increased driving performance of the ship is required. The rest of the time (most of the service) are powered by the D49 diesel engine.

      The 11356 has a different type of power plant - there are two marching turbines ДС71 with 8,5к hp, they always work when a stroke is needed. And two DT59 afterburner turbines - 21,5k hp, they are used when increased ship driving performance is required.

      Therefore, everything is very foggy with 11356; establishing M90FR will not help them much. To master DT59 / DS71 no one will. If the ships decide to enter the Navy, you will have to redo it under the CODAG scheme (for example, the similar 22350 - D49 + M90FR + Star Reducer), changing the dimensions of the machine ones, digesting the foundations for living.
  • kirpich
    kirpich April 25 2016 20: 34
    0
    Quote: Wiruz
    The aircraft carrier certainly looks solid, but "a large cabinet falls loudly", a loss of progress, and this is a barge with planes that will not be able to take off.

    Let's first wait for the destruction of at least one American aircraft carrier and only then we will talk about the uselessness of these "floating coffins". So far, they have fully justified themselves.


    So far, they gobble up resources. I am glad of that.
  • Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 April 26 2016 01: 01
    0
    Well, we can congratulate the Vietnamese Navy with the next gain.
    Vietnam Navy:
    4 submarines HQ-182 Hà Nội ("Hanoi") and HQ-183 Hí Chí Minh ("Ho Chi Minh"), HQ-184 Hải Phòng ("Haiphong") and HQ-185 Khánh Hòa ("Khanh Hoa"). The fifth HQ-186 Đà Nẵng ("Da Nang") was launched on December 28, 2014. On February 3 this year, it was delivered to Vietnam. The sixth-HQ-187 Ba Rịa – Vũng Tau ("Vung Tau") was laid down on 28.05.2014/28.09.2016/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, the transfer is planned this year.
    -2 frigates pr 11661E "Cheetah 3.9": HQ-011 Dinh Tien Hoang and HQ-012 Ly Thai To. Two more are under construction in Zelenodolsk, the delivery dates are 2017-2018.
    -5 TFR pr.159
    Four corvettes of the Sigma 4 project have been ordered, of which the first two will be built in the Netherlands, the next two in Vietnam with the assistance of the Dutch.
    - 10 RCA pr.1241.8 "Lightning". 2 more are under construction in Vietnam under license.
    - 1 MPK Ave 12412
    - 8 RCA pr. 205 "Mosquito"
    - 6 patrol boats pr. 10412 "Svetlyak"
    - 5 torpedo boats pr. 206-M "Storm"
    - 2 patrol boats, etc. TT-400TP-were built in Vietnam according to the Ukrainian project
    Mineral forces:
    2 MTShch pr. 266 "Aquamarine"
    4 BTShch pr. 1265 "Yakhont"
    2 RTFS Pr 1259
    Landing forces:
    3 SDK Ave 770
    1 TDK type LST-542-trophy American captured in South Vietnam
    2 TDK type HQ-521-Vietnamese construction
    Air Force Navy 6 Patrol Aircraft DHC-6 Twin Otter, 7 Ka-27, 2 Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma
    Coastal missile forces: DBK 4K44 Redut, 4K51 Rubezh, 3K55 Bastion
    Vietnam independently manufactures anti-ship missiles P-5, P-15 Termit, X-35 Uran
    Thus, the Vietnamese Navy are the strongest naval forces in the region, however, they cannot stand on equal footing as powerful as the Chinese Navy.