The UN Security Council condemned another test of ballistic missile by Pyongyang

The UN Security Council condemned the test of a ballistic missile launched from a submarine in DPRK 23 on April. Look TASS message.

On Saturday, Pyongyang about the next "grand success" of the military - the launch of a ballistic missile from a submarine. “Now the Navy (North Korea) can be given over the heads of puppet South Korean forces and American imperialists any time they want,” said Kim Jong-un after a test launch.

Here is how the CTAC test (the DPRK news agency) describes: “At the observation post (Kim Jong Un), the test plan was told, and he personally gave the order to start the test. As soon as the order was given, the submarine sank to the greatest depth, allowing the launch of ballistic missiles, and made a volley. The test was conducted to confirm the stability of the underwater ballistic missile launch system with a maximum depth. ”

The UN demanded that Pyongyang stop such activities. They recalled that "the development and testing of the DPRK of new ballistic missile technologies, even if launches fail, is strictly forbidden by five resolutions adopted from 2006 to 2016 a year."

The Security Council statement also expressed concern that such tests "contribute to the development of DPRK nuclear weaponsand also lead to increased tensions in the region and beyond. ”

The UN Security Council demanded that the DPRK leadership "refrain from further actions that violate the resolutions, and also fully comply with their obligations under these documents."

The document emphasizes that the members of the Security Council "will continue to closely monitor the situation," and, if necessary, "will take further significant measures in accordance with the previously expressed determination."

The UN reaffirmed the "importance of maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the region of Northeast Asia," and also declared "a commitment to resolving the crisis through dialogue."

Comments

[Vend]

Well, now the United States will not be able to wave a nuclear baton in front of the Koreans. Yes, and the pressure does not work

[Volzhanin2]

Quote: Wend

Well, now you can’t wave a nuclear club in front of the Koreans.

And for some reason I remembered how recently the Ukrainians launched a rocket from a tornado ... But at the time of the collapse of the USSR, one of the strongest armies was. Now only after Petya’s acceptance to the chest do illusions (hallucinations) about the strongest army in Europe arise
There before, they weren’t particularly afraid of anyone, I remember how the reports show the aggravation:
SK- everyone is ready to fight and are eager for battle with the urge to smash and destroy
UK - everyone will find out the addresses of the nearest bomb shelter and look at the USA with Hope

Isolating and sanctioning a country to impossibility and demanding that it fulfill certain agreements is something

[Finches]

It’s not Orthodox, on the eve of Easter, to say such a thing, and contrary to my sober opinion, this phrase will go, but it’s tempting-Eun, you still don't care for the USA anymore! ... Anglo-Saxons must be put in place!

[Stalker.1977]

And Vaska listens, but eats.

[Arkhan]

I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
You decide what to do with it.

[Wolverine]

The UN reaffirmed the "importance of maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the region of Northeast Asia," and also declared "a commitment to resolving the crisis through dialogue."

To maintain peace, it is important for everyone to get out of the borders of sovereign states, has it really not reached the UN so far?

[LÄRZ]

Quote: Wolverine

To maintain peace, it is important for everyone to get out of the borders of sovereign states

And do not conduct joint exercises Seoul-Washington.

[Petrof]

and when they attack the DPRK, will the UN protect it?
whom did it protect at all or who did the UN help?

if you want peace - get ready for war (c) classic

[clidon]

whom did it protect at all or who did the UN help?

Well, actually, South Korea was protected.

[Pirogov]

And when will the UN condemn itself?

[gray smeet]

Quote: Pirogov

And when will the UN condemn itself?

Quote from text:
"UN Security Council condemns the test of a ballistic missile carried out in the DPRK on April 23 .... "

Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council. It is logical to say that Russia (in the person of Vitaliy Churkin) approved the text of the conviction .... It is strange to watch how Russians condemn the condemnation of Russia (pun intended). Somewhere the logic is violated - either at the Russian Foreign Ministry, or at the comrades on the VO! And what do you think?

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

It never sits in the USA .... Our Foreign Ministry, I don’t understand, as well as the West pursue a policy of double standards: they are against the United States, then they are being supported. At the UN, there’s nothing to do if you don’t podpin .... dosnik of course. Why condemn the DPRK when they act in our interests and nightmare the United States ...

[gray smeet]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

Why condemn the DPRK when they act in our interests and nightmare the United States ...

Who told you that the DPRK is acting in our interests? Please confirm with facts that the DPRK acts in the interests of Russia? I will not even dispute your arguments (facts) - let them be considered by the comrades of VO. I'm leaving for the sim! Respectfully!

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND !!!!

[gray smeet]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND !!!!

Perfectly!
If you reason like that:
Taliban, ISIS, Colombian drug lords - all of our allies listed? Ah, al Qaeda forgot ...

Everything, everything is leaving, so as not to shake your worldviews!

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

This is exactly who you listed US BABIES!

[gray smeet]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

This is exactly who you listed US BABIES!

Yes, the offspring of the United States, but in words they are against the United States - sometimes, in their free time from military operations, people from Western countries are cut off to the camera, how will comrades relate to this - rejoice when they cut off or resent the Western world ?. Or do you have to be completely against the United States in any matter? Comrades connect to the topic ...

[Petrof]

Quote: gray smeet

Please confirm with facts that the DPRK acts in the interests of Russia?

you do not know that in South Korea there are American bases? and where would these bases be if there were no DPRK, would it be near Vladivostok?
news for you that South Korea has territorial claims against the Russian Federation - do you think they will become more active if they directly adjoin the Primorsky Territory?

[gray smeet]

I inform you that we have the state of Ukraine under the complete control of the United States, from the border with Ukraine to Moscow (the capital of Russia) less than 400 km - what will we do comrades? Ukraine claims to Russia - to the Urals! Japan wants an island! China (our ally!) - Far East! USA Siberia! But the bases are bad, but how will these bases differ from thousands, I emphasize thousands of others, of the same bases along the borders of Russia? And ..?

I am tormented by the question - why is Vitaly Churkin against the DPRK "barrel of cathetus" - against "our ally"? AND ? Our comrade from the VO, as a permanent representative, should be sent to the UN Security Council! After all, the VO's comrades are politically more literate than any Russian Foreign Ministry. And Churkina - to the wall, as a traitor to the interests of the motherland! According to Russian news, the DPRK is condemned - is it that Lavrov and the commander-in-chief are in collusion? (this is sarcasm).

[Petrof]

Quote: gray smeet

but how will these bases differ from thousands, I emphasize thousands of others, of the same bases along the borders of Russia? And ..?

Then why are you so worried that NATO has approached our borders?
in Poland there are all kinds of missile defense systems, in the Baltic states?

write a request to the Foreign Ministry website - ask for clarification of the current moment

[gray smeet]

For your information:
South Korea
In 2014, trade amounted to $ 27311,20 million. At the same time, Russian exports ($ 18287,00 million) far exceeded South Korean supplies to Russia ($ 9024,00 million).
Russian exports to South Korea (2014): the main item is mineral fuel, oil and oil products (79,2%), also metals and metal products (8,9%), food and agricultural raw materials (7,2%), wood and pulp and paper products (1,8%), machinery and equipment (1,4%).
South Korean supplies to Russia (2014): machinery and equipment (77,3%), chemical products (10,9%), metals and metal products (5,2%), textiles and shoes (1,6% )[13].

Trade with the Far Eastern regions of Russia

South Korea plays a huge role in foreign trade of a number of Far Eastern regions of the Russian Federation: in 2008, the Far East accounted for 59% of Russian exports to South Korea and more than 6,5% of imports from Kazakhstan. Most of the Far Eastern exports in 2008 were oil (77,4%) and fish products (12,7%). The importance of South Korea in foreign trade of some Far Eastern regions of the Russian Federation was significant: in 2008 Kazakhstan accounted for 53,9% of the foreign trade of the Kamchatka region, 48,4% of the foreign trade of the Sakhalin region, 14,7% of the foreign trade of the Khabarovsk Territory, 14,2% foreign trade of the Magadan region and 12,2% of foreign trade of the Primorsky Territory. The share of South Korea in the foreign trade of the Amur Region and Chukotka in 2008 was insignificant: 0,9 and 0,4% of the region’s foreign trade.

[gray smeet]

North Korea:
In 2014, the Russian government officially wrote off the DPRK Soviet debt of $ 11 billion. North Korea would never have repaid it anyway.
... It is also known that Pyongyang would like to buy a Su-35 from Moscow, but it does not have money for it (again at our expense? Under the pretext of fighting the United States?).

... Pyongyang wants (in the person of Russia) to diversify international relations and at the same time find a counterweight to Beijing. The Chinese are annoyed that North Korea has nuclear weapons and refuses to pursue serious economic reforms.
... DPRK relies on Russian investment and trade. In addition, North Koreans would welcome “another friend” to the UN Security Council, where they often talk about nuclear weapons and human rights.

Through cooperation with North Korea, despite its poverty, Russia has some economic opportunities. But their implementation lies outside the DPRK.

The main thing is that Moscow considers the territory of the DPRK as a space for the transit of gas and electricity to consumers in South Korea. Thus, the Putin government is not interested in North Korea itself.

... By the way, Pyongyang and Moscow declared 2015 the Year of Friendship between the two states, as reported on March 11 by the North Korean agency CTAC. The decision was made "in honor of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Korea and the victory in the Great Patriotic War."
But then a series of nuclear and missile tests and our country came out for sanctions against the DPRK.

[Petrof]

and why did you write this?

It has become fashionable to learn a foreign language
To visit different capital countries
Some German, some English, some Hebrew
But I decided to learn the language Korean

I began to attend more often weddings, anniversaries
From chimchi and carrots since childhood, I bastard
And I already know a lot of words in Korean
Before I go to bed I repeat them

Chimcha, carrot, suri-muri, megicha
Ajibay, Madabay
Well, come on, don't forget!
It is hard in training, but easy in battle!
I'll learn Korean and go to Korea! ...

Quote: gray smeet

I am tormented by the question

Have you already sent a request to the Foreign Ministry website?

[gray smeet]

Quote: Petrof

Have you already sent a request to the Foreign Ministry website?

For me, the answer is obvious, the question I asked, rather as an allegory.
but about the verses:
Departure from the country (Russia) is now free, in contrast to the Juche country you sing about. Pack your bags, because there is the main interest for you, and all the more the interests of the DPRK, you defend with selflessness!
And I will somehow live here in Russia hated by you and will operate with the interests of Russia.

[Petrof]

Quote: gray smeet

in contrast to the Juche country you sing about.

Tell me, is Russian a native language for you? if yes - please show me where I sing the DPRK? exact quote please

and yes, maybe you won't believe here, in the Primorsky Territory - North Koreans are full


in Russia you hate ///

come on, uncle, give an exact quote where I said that Russia is hateful to me
as they say about the tossing of sacks.

[gray smeet]

Quote: Petrof

are you uncle (censorship cuts a bad word)?

It's not cultural.

Quote: Petrof

come on, uncle, give an exact quote where I said that Russia is hateful to me

And what to answer to a person who defends the interests of a foreign state to which (judging by the verses) is going to leave?

By the way, what are so many North Koreans doing with you? Have they escaped from the DPRK country? Urgently inform the embassy of the DPRK and the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation about the escaped - they (escaped) will be grateful to you!

[Petrof]

As I understand it, there will be no quotes - no more bags

[Starik72]

The UN, why didn't YOU care when the United States gouged Yugoslavia, Iraq, and at the suggestion of the United States, Europe gouged Libya? But when the small but proud population of the DPRK is preparing to defend itself from the United States and South Korea, YOU are concerned. Aren't YOU concerned that the US bases are located all over the world? Why are YOU not concerned that NATO is coming close to the borders of RUSSIA? Why are YOU not concerned about the war in Syria, and the plight of Ukraine where FASCISM is openly raising its head? My opinion is that YOU UN, located on the territory of the United States, has long turned into a US SHAVKU!

[I doubt it]

Russia is a member of the Security Council. And all these resolutions did not pass by. So what? But nothing. Ok.
However, as with Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya ...