The former head of one of the Oboronservis enterprises was sued for 400 million rubles.

43
Alexey Dushutin, former director of OAO Moscow Military Construction Bureau (VSUM), a member of Oboronservis OJSC (now Garrison JSC), has filed a lawsuit against 400 million in recent years for criminal cases, reports Kommersant.



Dushutin has already been convicted of 4 of the year for embezzling real estate, and now he is getting acquainted with the materials of the second case filed under the article "fraud."

“Alexey Dushutin, as it was established earlier in court sessions, having headed VSUM in 2006, was actively engaged in the sale of real estate owned by the joint stock company. Among the property entrusted to him were 17 of expensive residential and non-residential premises in the center of Moscow and in the elite microdistrict Serebryany Bor, which Mr. Dushutin lost in five years of work for a pittance from one of the oil companies and among the top ten banks, ”the newspaper writes.

In 2011, these transactions were noted in Oboronservis. Dushutin was dismissed, and a criminal case was opened against him. As a result, at the beginning of 2014, 4 was imprisoned for his years in prison.

“While the ex-general director was serving his sentence in the Lipetsk region, the new VSUM executives appealed to arbitration courts demanding to recognize the transactions made by them invalid and return the lost buildings to the society. However, the military builders lost the litigation with the bank and the oil company, ”notes“ Kommersant ”.

In the meantime, investigators completed an investigation into another episode of fraud, in which Dushutin was also involved. This time, he is charged with receiving a “solid” kickback for trying to sell a former military base in the Kashira highway. According to the newspaper, the sale and purchase agreement “slowed down” in Rosreestr, and the deal was not completed. Therefore, the ex-director was charged with attempted fraud.

While Dushutin, who had been convoyed to Moscow, was getting acquainted with the case, the 400 million lawsuit became known: having failed to return its property through arbitration, VSUM decided to sue at least its cost.

“Now Alexei Dushutin will have to defend himself in two courts at once - criminal and civil,” the newspaper concludes.
  • RIA News
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    April 25 2016 10: 30
    They steal ... And so for hundreds of years.
    1. +17
      April 25 2016 10: 33
      it's time to equate, theft of state. money and getting kickbacks, to treason Homeland
      1. +14
        April 25 2016 10: 47
        As I understand it, this is one of the "effective managers" ...
        So we will fight with windmills. Dashing and greedy for other people's money, there was always enough. But why they still haven’t returned the confiscation to the Criminal Code, or rather they returned it nominally, but they don’t apply, this is a mystery ...
        After all, such a "manager" knowing that he, his family, relatives - will remain only with the minimum housing required by social norms, deprived of everything stolen, which is proven elementary if desired, he is unlikely to even allow the thought of stealing something ...
        1. +4
          April 25 2016 11: 02
          Some leave, or plant, others come .... and as always on the thumb ...
        2. 0
          April 25 2016 17: 58
          "After all, such a" manager "knowing that he, his family, relatives - will remain only with the minimum housing required by social norms, deprived of everything stolen, which is proven elementary if desired, he is unlikely to even allow the thought of stealing something ..." - do you seriously think that now, with the current development of banking, something can be confiscated ????
          Lord !!! in Soviet times it was quite difficult to confiscate uncles, aunts, banks with gold / money in the country, bruliki in hiding places, etc., etc.
          And now...

          "Together with the plastic card, you will receive a full package of documents on which the account is registered, as well as the SIM card to which it is tied. With the help of our debit cards, you can replenish and cash out funds through an anonymous account, use the Internet account and, in principle, use a plastic with a card, like your usual plastic card, the only difference is that this card will be registered to a third party. We offer Visa and MasterCard debit cards, Standard, Classic, Gold standard cards. We offer deliveries of debit plastic cards for cash out with balances from 150.000.00 rubles.
          Always have an account in all major Russian banks, accounts are completely anonymous and are registered with third parties.
          Together with a debit plastic card you get all the documents received from the bank, as well as data for entering the Internet bank and the SIM card to which your card is attached.
          Debit Cards Available:
          Masterbank visa gold balance on a 250.000 card costs 230 $
          Unicredit visa gold balance on an 200.000 card costs 150 $
          Alpha bank visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
          Sberbank visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
          VTB24 visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
          PSB visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
          ROS visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
          Alfa bank visa platinum balance on a 350.000 card costs 280 $
          Sberbank visa platinum balance on an 350.000 card costs 280 $
          Vanguard visa platinum balance on 350.000 card costs 280 $
          VTB24 visa platinum balance on a 350.000 card costs 280 $
          PSB visa platinum balance on the 350.000 card costs 280 $
          ROS visa platinum balance on a 350.000 card costs 280 $
          You can pay for a card in any way convenient for you and in any currency.
          In addition, it is possible to open accounts with special conditions: the issuance of one or several additional cards, the issuance of a virtual physical card, binding a specific phone number, opening an account with a specific bank, etc. "
          И such firms selling cards issued on the left by breakouts, you buy a dozen or two cards, discard money through them to others, travel abroad (and cards are not declared at customs, unlike cash), cash out by any means in any banks and put them in a bank cell - EVERYTHING ... you won’t get anymore ...
          And this is just ONE way ...
          You can open a left-hand intermediary company there and buy some kind of crap for crazy grandmas there, which you can immediately sell or throw in the trash depending on greed ... Yes, a breakthrough of ways ..
          In reality, only housing can be confiscated, provided that an arrest is made on time, otherwise otherwise there will be seams ...
          1. -3
            April 25 2016 19: 09
            All this nonsense is solved very, very simple. Only the political will of our Guarantor and our headless government is needed! But so far this is very far away! So for now, you can calm down. There will be no progress!
          2. 0
            April 26 2016 03: 21
            Quote: your1970
            Masterbank visa gold balance on a 250.000 card costs 230 $
            Unicredit visa gold balance on an 200.000 card costs 150 $
            Alpha bank visa gold balance on a 200.000 card costs 150 $
            ...

            - Have you ever met the concept of "kidalovo" in your life? Congratulations if so. So this is a scam in its purest form. Don't believe me - you can try to buy it yourself for penny penny visa card from 150000 rubles on the balance for $ 150 good

            Quote: your1970
            You can open a left-hand intermediary company there and buy some kind of crap for crazy grandmas there, which you can immediately sell or throw in the trash depending on greed ..

            - if the money for which the "crap" is purchased comes from the financing of the State Defense Order, it will not work. We google "Special accounts of GOZ", we read, we think a lot .. only then we write something ..
            1. 0
              April 26 2016 12: 33
              You see, I gave an example of the first company I came across, people who WANT to withdraw money (big MONEY) know a lot of ways, and believe me, at the beginning of 2000 there were many real companies that sold cards issued to left comrades. Why do I know? I collided when I got a card the second appeared .. For a long time butt on what basis they issued if I didn’t write statements, and for a long time I got a break from the prosecutor’s office, that I didn’t know about the second account in principle ....
              Defense order - yes, but all the other sawing budgets of any level ???
        3. -3
          April 25 2016 19: 05
          Quote: Andrey K
          why they still haven’t returned the confiscation to the Criminal Code, or rather returned nominally, but do not apply, this is a mystery ...

          This is not a mystery at all. Putin bluntly said that the stolen should remain with the thief! This is directly confirmed by practice! This is where we must proceed! Hence all the attempts to "fight" corruption!
          1. 0
            April 26 2016 03: 23
            Quote: Saratoga833
            Putin said bluntly that stolen should remain with the thief

            - lies. Or give a link to the document where "Putin said it" wink
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      April 25 2016 10: 33
      They steal - and you won’t take anything from him. They, as always, have all the property on their wife, mother-in-law, etc. I don’t know how in other countries, but in Russia this is a big problem - how to return stolen at the expense of relatives.
      1. +19
        April 25 2016 10: 36
        Maybe it's time to take as an example the experience of the Chinese comrades?
        1. +4
          April 25 2016 10: 42
          And it seems to me that delugans can be calculated in the face. Looking at the photo, you can see right away that he is thinking about Russia!
        2. +6
          April 25 2016 11: 04
          Quote: Thrall
          Maybe it's time to take as an example the experience of the Chinese comrades?

          All think correctly, comrade, only our experience in such matters is large and we have very effectively acted ... Insolent thieves of different stripes!
        3. 0
          April 25 2016 18: 26
          In the picture, everyone together saw only ONE side of the question - ahhh, they took the darling under the tower !!! Nobody saw SECOND parties - what the vice mayor In spite of he took bribes and stole for all executions / confiscations. Did he stop the knowledge that they would shoot and confiscate ?? !!! NO!!!
          Z.Y. read the meeting of the People’s Commissariat of Communications and the Prosecutor’s Office of the 1935 of the year (this is to the question that no one stole JACOB under I.V. Stalin. I advise you to read completely and carefully - the material is very interesting and indicative. It is important to understand volumes larceny-the maximum party at Stalin was 600 rubles)
          The fight against theft in communications
          (Material of the All-Union Meeting of NKSvyaz Workers with the USSR Prosecutor's Office) 1935 year)
          "The dynamics of embezzlement and embezzlement from these amounts is expressed in the following data: in 1933, for the entire year, embezzlement and embezzlement was 10 1/2 million rubles, for 9 months of this year - more than 12 million rubles. That is, for 9 months there were more embezzlements and embezzlements than for the whole of 1933. Analyzing these data by district, it is possible to establish both the regions and the main culprits of these phenomena.Western region against 300 thousand rubles. 1933 - about 500 thousand. rubles for 9 months of 1934 the Middle Volga administration - 584 thousand rubles for the whole of 1933 and: 1 thousand rubles for 700 months of 9 (head of the communications department) t. Zharkov). -Siberian administration in 1934 the volume of thefts and losses reached almost 1934 1/1 million rubles (head of the communications department, comrade Kazakov). Western Siberia - there, according to statistics, spending somewhat decreased. In the Sverdlovsk communications department, comrade Sinkov has a volume of thefts in the region of more than a million. In the city of Moscow, which is especially unacceptable, the head of the postal service department, Comrade Stekhov, committed theft of $ 1.120 thousand rubles. "
          "In Voronezh, a certain Belokopytov worked without any verification,] who
          stole a bag with 39.500 rub. We only learned about this when we began to request a bank that said that it was his bag, that please give it back ... After that, we began to search, and found out that Belokopytov received this bag from
          Narcomfin, I bought a house in Voronezh, began to furnish it and, according to current traditions, plant green spaces around. They became interested in this, began to say why we do not have such a house and green spaces, but he has everything. When Belokopytov found out that they were interested in his bag, he, of course, escaped."
          "The communications worker of the Western Directorate Vladimirov was sentenced to 10 years in prison for forgery and embezzlement, but they forgot to arrest him, and he left."
          And this is for a snack rzhaka
          “In the midst of the campaign to help the Chelyuskinites, a telegram signed by Comrade Kuibyshev arrived at the Moscow Central Telegraph. By chance, the word 'government' was omitted from this telegram, but from the text of the telegram it was quite obvious that the telegram was about the fulfillment of operational tasks. that there is no person in the Union who would not know the name of Kuibyshev. ”The telegram lay among the telegrams going to the Far East at 19 and only after 40 was it pulled out from under the berth into the light of day. we brought to justice 19 people and all these people did not know who Kuibyshev was. Maybe this is by accident! No, these people did not know who Comrade Molotov was. During the trial, in a room crowded with telegraph workers, someone from the third row who asked who Kalinin was, promptedthat this is the chairman of the Council of People's Commissars. "
          1. -1
            April 25 2016 19: 24
            I will never agree with you! If a person knows that he will be surely convicted of corruption with the obligatory confiscation of the loot, the number of corrupt officials will decrease exponentially! Of course, there will be corrupt officials in the family, not without a freak, but I am sure that there will not be such massive corruption!
            1. 0
              April 25 2016 19: 45
              Your right to disagree, I gave TWO examples
              - give at least one ONE serious example-the state that conquered corruption..

              additionally:
              "Over the past 12 years in China on charges of bribery Shot 13 000 (!) officials, including the mayor of Suzhou and the deputy mayor of Beijing, vice speaker of parliament, dozens of ministers and governors. And last year, 160 000 employees of the Chinese state apparatus were arrested on corruption charges. In total, since the beginning of the reforms (30 years ago), it has thundered into prison ... MILLION officials.
              Translated into Russian, more than 10 000 people were arrested per month =300 more people per day...

              And do not talk about Singapore — with their meager 700 sq. Km and 5mln population — this area can be cleaned up in a week .. Well, let them at least try Moscow - 2561 km² and the population times 4 more ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                April 25 2016 20: 41
                Quote: your1970
                Translated into Russian, more than 10 000 people were arrested per month = more than 300 people per day ...

                - China is now facing a serious struggle with the so-called "naked" officials. These are officials who:

                - stolen enough to send children and relatives .. yes to the same Canada, it’s fashionable now with them
                - children and relatives there .. do not live in poverty, to put it mildly, and they have already managed to get hold of local Canadians
                - the official remains in place and .. continues to steal ..

                These are the successes in the fight against corruption in China wink
      2. -1
        April 25 2016 19: 14
        Quote: Sluggish
        the big problem is how to return stolen at the expense of relatives.

        Yes, this is not a problem! Some guys solve this problem, unlike our toothless police, at one time! At the state level, I repeat again, only political will is needed. And nothing more!
      3. 0
        22 May 2016 12: 23
        Quote: Sluggish
        I do not know how in other countries

        There is a larger budget and steal more accordingly.
        Quote: Sluggish
        in Russia this is a big problem - how to return stolen at the expense of relatives.

        Perhaps even more complicated, private property is there - a sacred cow for a long time.
        Perhaps a law prohibiting ALL heirs of thieves and fraudsters and direct relatives to occupy any public office, apply for any subsidies, deprive citizenship, or acquire real estate would help.
    4. +2
      April 25 2016 10: 42
      Quote: Thrall
      They steal ... And so for hundreds of years.

      Please tell me the country where they do not steal. Very interesting to know.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +2
      April 25 2016 10: 58
      Unfortunately, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not contain the concept of "treason". The liberals wiped it out, because they have no homeland, but there is a place for storing the "dough". Liability for high treason has now been introduced (275), but this is no longer the same thing.
    7. -2
      April 25 2016 11: 43
      "I entered Mosestrada as if I was in my own home, and now I go there as if to Calvary ... and who doesn't drink? Tell me! No, I'm waiting! Enough, you spat in my soul! Scoundrels!" (k / f Pokrovskie Vorota ") Many people steal from us, but not many. The" civilians "have a lot, but not all. laughing
    8. +1
      April 25 2016 13: 01
      Drinking seems to have become less.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -1
        April 25 2016 14: 30
        Drink less, but more strong. Our beer has one "dryness" instead of aftertaste. The alcohol industry must and must be nationalized. The largest taxes (in the form of excise taxes) are paid by drinkers and smokers. At the same time, they also spread rot. The hypocrisy is obvious, pardon the tufting. The country is fed with a palm tree of the natives of Malaysia from which soap was made in the USSR. And even our president does not know that there is a law obliging to indicate its presence on the packaging.
        Ah, the Kazakhs are great! They rejected and removed from the shelves our and Ukrainian dairy products containing this rubbish, without indicating its availability. If our state is poisoning people on free kickbacks, then it is also an accomplice in this lawlessness. Why do not we produce edible canned fish? Previously, they could at least be replaced with sprats, at least with gasoline (there was simply no other). But they did not learn how to make sprats, except for boiled, foul-smelling sprats in a jar. However, the business is a nightmare!
        Some of the structures of the Ministry of Defense also made a business. We are waiting for the concept of "military services" to be introduced into the Armed Forces. And here is no laughing matter. hi
    9. 0
      April 25 2016 20: 06
      I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
      You decide what to do with it.
  2. +3
    April 25 2016 10: 34
    And Vasilyeva, did you return something? If the part was returned, then it’s good.
    1. +1
      April 25 2016 10: 40
      Quote: avvg
      And Vasileva, something returned?

      Are you really not in the know, or have you decided to throw a twinkle to facilitate discussion? wink

      For a start:

      Цитата: http://www.rbc.ru/politics/17/04/2015/5530f7879a7947b8a505e096
      The Ministry of Defense refused a civil lawsuit against the main defendant in the Oboronservis case Evgenia Vasilyeva in the amount of 2,8 billion rubles. Her lawyers explained that the damage to the state was compensated.


      Quote: http://www.newsru.com/russia/20aug2015/vasilyeva.html
      Former head of the department of property relations of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Yevgenia Vasilyeva, who is serving time in a colony, paid off for all those convicted in the case of multimillion-dollar embezzlement in Oboronservis. This became known the day before the court session, at which the petition of the defense of the former official on parole was to be considered.

      Vasilyeva paid to the state more than 216 million rubles in compensation for damage, a source familiar with the situation told Interfax. "The money, several tranches, arrived last week on the accounts of organizations and enterprises recognized as victims in this case. Funds in the amount of 216 million 287 thousand 223 rubles were contributed by Yevgenia Vasilyeva's father," the agency's interlocutor explained. The source noted that by the payment of compensation, Vasilyeva's father brought the issue of parole closer

      That's about as Yes
      1. -2
        April 25 2016 19: 29
        And father Vasilyeva, a certain Zubkov, where did he get the money? And why is he not on the same bench with Vasilyeva?
        1. +1
          April 26 2016 02: 59
          Especially for illiterate flooders banned on Wikipedia and Google:

          Quote: Saratoga833
          And father Vasilyeva, a certain Zubkov ...

          Quote: Vika
          Evgenia Vasilieva is the only daughter of St. Petersburg businessman Nikolai Anatolyevich Vasiliev (born October 25, 1954) and Lyudmila Iosifovna Vasilieva (born May 20, 1956)

          Quote: Saratoga833
          where did you get the money?

          Quote: Vika
          Father Vasilyeva - co-owner of companies manufacturing and supplying fiber optic cables and plastic pipes (ZAO Plastkom, ZAO OKS 01), by his own admission - a multimillionaire

          Plastcom CJSC and OKS 01 CJSC: enterprises specialize in the production of protective plastic pipes for linear communication facilities and the complete supply of products, tools and materials for the construction of fiber-optic transmission lines

          That's where the money comes from .. everything, as it were, is simple ..
    2. 0
      April 25 2016 10: 40
      they returned to her, thriving
    3. 0
      April 25 2016 10: 45
      With her own paintings and what she created during her imprisonment fellow and she doesn’t have her own money feel ...
      1. +2
        April 25 2016 11: 25
        Quote: brasist
        they returned to her, thriving

        Quote: brasist
        With her own paintings and what she created during her imprisonment, she doesn’t have her own money

        - but her dad’s enough money is enough to pay 216+ lyam rubles for a daughter ...

        Quote: Vika
        Father Vasilyeva - co-owner of companies manufacturing and supplying fiber optic cables and plastic pipes (ZAO Plastkom, ZAO OKS 01), by his own admission - a multimillionaire

        - At the same time, for the sake of fun, take an interest in what these closed joint stock companies produce and who goes with their customers .. so simple for general education .. field marshals, damn it .. laughing
  3. +1
    April 25 2016 10: 38
    Quote: avvg
    And Vasilyeva, something returned?

    Campaign, will return with his creativity. She is a gifted person smile
    1. 0
      April 25 2016 19: 31
      Ugh at her and her "creativity"!
    2. 0
      April 26 2016 20: 08
      I also know how to draw, pay per square meter?
  4. cap
    +1
    April 25 2016 10: 38
    Who took him to such a mug?
    Quote: tobacco
    it's time to equate, theft of state. money and getting kickbacks, to treason Homeland


    Under this condition, he would not have gone.
  5. +2
    April 25 2016 10: 46
    Now Dushutin will need to find 400 million somewhere. In Rostec, he will give the deputy to the stool - business for a couple of months.
    Look at the faces of our officials. How many faces do you see there? 10-15%, the rest is blowing faces. Arrogant, lost the scent. Do Putin and Medvedev see this? The stump is clear. And start to uproot - you have to dig very deeply, the roots go back to the time of Svyatoslav-Igor-Oleg, Russia is too rich, not some Singapore. Curse over us.
  6. +1
    April 25 2016 10: 57
    That's why he has a budget to share / saw.
    It’s not enough for everyone. Therefore, those who have access to it use all the ways to grab more.
    Need to share. While there is something. And some do not want to. They are being punished for this.
    It all depends on scale. According to popular wisdom: he stole a bag of potatoes - to prison, stole billions - to power ...
    That is the system. Little depends on people in it.
    You can either be in the system or outside it ...
  7. -1
    April 25 2016 11: 22
    The lawsuit with the bank and the oil company had to be won with the help of a pair of airborne platoons. They would hang directors or shareholders for causal places, they would immediately return everything.
    Seriously, I think that this is not the end. In the case of Vasilyeva, the sold property was returned to the Moscow Region. So, there are options for resolving the issue.
    1. 0
      April 25 2016 19: 33
      Thinking in vain! Our Guarantor "does not hand over his own"!
  8. +2
    April 25 2016 11: 23
    It is high time to spit on the Council of Europe and introduce the death penalty for theft and corruption as treason. I’ve been writing on this subject for a long time, but what’s the matter? Who makes the laws, and there are plenty of lobbyists. And they would have hung one, the other, you see someone would have thought.
  9. +1
    April 25 2016 11: 45
    The third is still needed, the tribunal! And for the defense to the wall. Look around, among which crocodiles we live! Are you kidding me?
  10. +1
    April 25 2016 12: 19
    Now he needs to paint, compose poetry and post his photos on Instagram, and everything will be fine. Precedents are already available.
  11. +1
    April 25 2016 13: 49
    Only hang this thief! The lawsuit, the court and the gallows !!!
  12. +1
    April 25 2016 14: 38
    Again Markin will tell that the entire evidence base is sobron, and the thief will not escape justice laughing
  13. +2
    April 25 2016 15: 44
    Oh! Why am I not surprised? It seems to me that this gentleman is the chairman of the Pound (as from the golden calf). Now he is being told "I can’t do it," in 3 years the next amnesty will be released, and the main persons involved, who cannot be seen, will continue to swagger. And here we are like suckers hanging noodles on our ears - "no one type will escape from justice." But whoever needs it not only did not leave, they did not even come. It is good to dissolve snot - there will never be order in this country. Only the expropriation of the expropriators, as grandfather Lenin said.
  14. 0
    April 25 2016 17: 38
    However, it is not badly said "civil case" for 400 million ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"