Civil embarrassment. Drama in one act

102
Characters: Citizen, Patriot, Liberal

CITIZEN (Silent)

PATRIOT: Well, why are you silent? Are you silent? And we, patriots, fight for you every day like in a war — with these ... (He points to Liberal.) But what a war! At least there is a fight, then a dream, and here there is no sleep, no rest ... Before lunch, in the Duma, then live broadcast, and then in an informal setting ... Hey, can you hear me?

CITIZEN (NODS.)

PATRIOT: Did you fall asleep at all? Wake up (Slightly beats the Citizen on the left cheek.)

CITIZEN (Nods intelligible.)

PATRIOT: Well, well then! Do you understand though that Putin is our everything? The best that Russia has today is even better! If not Putin, then who? Do you understand? (Beats Citizen slightly stronger.)

CITIZEN (Nods harder.)

LIBERAL: So what were you sprawling before him? What are you - an amoeba without their brains? Putin's slave? (Beats the Citizen on the right cheek.) No, look, they beat him, but he is silent! Yes, let me finally give up this Putin's troll! (He beats the Citizen on the same cheek.) Do you at least understand that Putin and democracy are two incompatible things? What Putin Putin can not be a replacement?

CITIZEN (Nods with understanding.)

LIBERAL: Well, thank God, it even came ... (Beats the Citizen approvingly on the right cheek.)

PATRIOT: Who do you give yourself to beat yourself, moron? (He beats the Citizen condemning his left cheek.) Do you really care who beats you? Putin is rowing for you without rest, we, the patriots, are rowing for you for Putin, and you cannot give to any of these Greves, Kudrin, Medvedevs! (Beats the Citizen from the soul in the left cheek, he staggers, but does not fall.)

LIBERAL: And for Medvedev you will answer to Putin!

PATRIOT: What, I said Medvedev? Where? When? Witness who? All you are lying, deceitful Liberal, and your villa is in Nice, and your children abroad are learning!

LIBERAL: Witness - Citizen! He will confirm! (Beats the Citizen in the right ear.) And your villa, by the way, is across the road from mine! And children in the same college with my study! ..

PATRIOT: Well, no! Do not confirm! Do not even hope! (He beats the Citizen from the whole span of his left ear, he falls.) And about the children and the villa - this also needs to be confirmed ...

CITIZEN (Attempts to kneel, but falls back.)

LIBERAL: Well, it seems that today our civil duel with you is over ...

PATRIOT: Looks like ... This is what citizens are still unstable for us!

LIBERAL: What are you like under your Putin?

PATRIOT: Listen, he is my same as yours! Stop splashing on the audience - see, she no longer responds.

LIBERAL: So where is it now? In the National? In the fish market?

PATRIOT: Perhaps, in Rybniy - there they just delivered fresh oysters, they only called me an hour ago. It means that neither ours nor yours will yet be, we will sit in the order of the Constitution, without this ideology prohibited in it ...

LIBERAL: Will there be girls?

PATRIOT: And no one has yet forbidden them! Today, by the way, they also delivered fresh ones ...

(The Patriot and the Liberal are removed; the lying Citizen tries to portray something after them, but they don’t turn on him.)

A curtain
102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    April 25 2016 17: 00
    Some crap
    1. +17
      April 25 2016 17: 03
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Some crap

      I didn't get that shit either. It is clear that the author is a great playwright, but apparently my level is small for understanding such a masterpiece.
      In my memory, on the contrary, Kasyanov (Liberal) with a muzzle with the remnants of a cake after throwing a Citizen, and patriots in life do not bother a bit, unlike the couch Ura Patriots and Slogans on forums.
      And as the author in vain wrote the State Duma deputies to the Patriots, there are some artisans sitting there who are ready to sell to anyone for the sake of a mandate
    2. +3
      April 25 2016 17: 03
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Some crap


      What did the author want to say or show?
      1. +31
        April 25 2016 17: 43
        Quote: cniza
        Quote: RUSOIVAN
        Some crap


        What did the author want to say or show?

        Quote: Volzhanin2
        I didn't get that shit either. It is clear that the author is a great playwright, but apparently my level is small for understanding such a masterpiece.

        ))) IMHA comrades, in short, from all the media there is a mahach of the "patriots" of the Ulyukaev Siluanovs with support from EdRa and others against the liberals who are not patriots and the oligarchs accompanying them, they sneeze each other, and so and so and use compromising materials ... ..
        and the common people look at them and think - oh, how difficult it is for them to live. they fight every hour ... well, we have to be patient, you think the surgeon (the mother-in-law's doctor) sends drugs to the pharmacy (they don't have iron) and then for another drug and so you look, our medicine under the policy for 20000 thousand treated ... you think .. eh! Well, Gref gets an atata for his banking cunning and other liberals will be afraid and the owners of the insurance type MAKS will not behave so badly))) and then you look and they are in the same "restaurant" at the same table, villas on the Mediterranean on the same street, children in one college as a CITIZEN, endures and waits, pulling up the belt and enduring cuffs with the hope that soon our all "bad" will win. )))
        The author wanted to say this))) but he was very clever))))
        1. +8
          April 25 2016 18: 00
          This is from when Siluanov and Ulyukaev became patriots, but these are Cossacks mishandled, they have long been needed on the rack. stop
          1. +5
            April 25 2016 19: 13
            Quote: Ros 56
            This is from when Siluanov and Ulyukaev became patriots, but these are Cossacks mishandled, they have long been needed on the rack. stop

            Therefore, he took them in quotation marks, and they are part of the power ...
      2. +21
        April 25 2016 17: 48
        The author wanted to say that they have us on all sides, which is not clear? That the people are not the one caught by our politicians. They are probably waiting for 17 years, and then they will have fun when the Russian peasant begins to distribute the cradles to both right and left.
        1. +2
          April 26 2016 09: 26
          Ros56! 17.48. And what does the 17th year have to do with it? And there were two revolutions. The king was removed from power by his own courtiers and allies (army and navy). And the man began to give out gifts not on his own. And today, under what slogans can I give out gifts? Equality, brotherhood !? On the outskirts were against crooks and thieves, but it turned out how?
          1. 0
            April 26 2016 10: 00
            Next year will be 17, no associations? I advise you not to be there at this time, read about the consequences from A.S. Pushkin about the Russian riot.
      3. +6
        April 25 2016 17: 49
        Quote: cniza
        Quote: RUSOIVAN
        Some crap


        What did the author want to say or show?

        It's just that the author took and omitted 90% of Russian citizens on whose shoulders the country rests. About 10% are businessmen, activists, people of creative professions, managers, etc. Namely, the bulk of Russian citizens work in factories, factories, in car fleets, in shops, etc. For them, the main thing is to have peace, stability, a roof over their heads, a good salary without delay, so that children can learn, and so on. There will not be these 90% percent, 10% will simply bend. It is also a veiled call for citizens to come to the "barricades" in order to arrange a revolution in Russia that is so necessary for the West.
        1. +1
          April 25 2016 18: 02
          Read, do not be lazy.
          And then about 10% I think you will stop talking.

          Manpower is a population capable of working in the national economy by its age, physical, and educational characteristics. It includes the able-bodied population (without disabled people) of working age - from 16 to 60 years for men and from 16 to 55 years for women, as well as actually working pensioners. In Russia, the working-age population is 87,0 million, the non-working population is 56 million. Thus, per 1000 able-bodied people there are 630 dependents, which is the upper limit of the demographic burden on the able-bodied population.
          1. +2
            April 25 2016 18: 10
            Quote: demo
            Read, do not be lazy.
            And then about 10% I think you will stop talking.

            There is such a science statistics, and so according to its calculations, not only Russia, the whole world is divided by these percentages 90% -10%. And these percentages are averaged. And read carefully what I wrote in my post. It was written about representatives of professions, and not about dependents.
          2. +1
            April 25 2016 21: 35
            Quote: demo
            Thus, 1000 of working age accounts for 630 dependents, which is the upper limit of the demographic burden on the working population.

            What are your conclusions? To bury old people and sick alive? Do not give birth to children? Then only young and all efficient will remain. Nazi ideology is behind your numbers. Only soon you will become an old man or an invalid, we’ll see what numbers you sing.
            1. +4
              April 26 2016 01: 19
              In my understanding, dependents are not only old people and sick people, but also those who receive various benefits unreasonably. Do you think that the deputies have imposed privileges upon themselves deservedly? And there are many such categories. A passport officer at the police station has the same benefits as other employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who often risk their lives on the streets or in hot spots. The question is - why? The so-called "parquet generals" from Min. Defense officers enjoy benefits and all kinds of compensation more than combat officers serving "in the field." Here they are the dependents. And Vanya pays for this whole banquet out of the 1000 able-bodied ones. And you say ideology. hi
            2. +2
              April 26 2016 09: 40
              Alexey K! 21.35. Nazi ideology? And when Medvedev says that medicine is a service industry, you have to pay for services! Is this not Nazi psychology? Isn't paid education a Nazi? But is Medvedev’s statement about increasing population mobility (in fact, the call to become all homeless) is not Nazism? And the announcer at the May 9 parade about detachments, hostages, and prisoners is not Nazism! But what about Medvedev’s statement about the underdeveloped Soviet economy and developed modern economy? And the cries of shifting the retirement age? What about the optimization of medicine?
        2. +1
          April 26 2016 09: 31
          Wend! 17.49. Sorry I do not agree. In my opinion, that citizens do not moo, do not calve. Revolution!? Do we have a lot of protests in the media? Here in the West they are protesting (but in my opinion to no avail), but we are protesting? Damn it! The people are happy with everything! The main thing is full of shops !!! That’s the whole point of life!
      4. +1
        April 25 2016 18: 06
        Quote: cniza
        What did the author want to say or show?

        And most importantly, with whom is the author yourself positions - with a citizen, patriot or liberal, it is not at all clear. Apparently, this comrade is smarter than everyone and is hovering over the fight. The article is a big and fat minus.
        1. +2
          April 25 2016 21: 39
          Quote: marna
          with whom the author positions himself - with a citizen, patriot or liberal, is not at all clear.

          Probably all the same, he positions himself as a citizen who has insomnia and therefore decided to be an alarm clock, that is, to wake a sleeping citizen with a blow to the end, since his cheeks are already taken.
      5. +1
        April 25 2016 18: 30
        Quote: RUSOIVAN
        Some crap

        Quote: cniza

        What did the author want to say or show?

        Interestingly, this abstract article is not the first time, it is about the Wolf, now this ... Fine manipulation, do not care about the sense, the majority will not understand, but, and the main point, the sediment will remain like a hook in the gills. It seems that he applied both of them, but he smeared one another and left an unsaid hint, everything is clear, bets have gone on another running horse)))? ...
        1. 0
          April 26 2016 09: 48
          Space! 18.30. And what is the hint? Who is the other horse? The situation in the United States, good-evil, patriot liberal.
          1. 0
            April 27 2016 12: 07
            A colleague, this fairy tale, is just the author’s camouflage, he’d rather pass for an idiot than be caught in betrayal and lose confidence and ears.
            Quote: Region 34
            And what is the hint?
            the hint is that the author, who discredits himself in Russia and is soiled head over heels in ... the liberal opposition, to which the people are already spitting and from which there is no sense, foreign curators merge, but before that they want to smear them or equate the pro-government elite of patriots with them ... Naturally, this action is designed for the layman and the citizen, a sort of attempt to unite the multidirectional vectors of hatred, some towards the liberals, others towards the authorities, creating a united civil front, decent, but naive people, on the eve of the elections. Such a subtle and inconspicuous manipulation into the dark, consciousness of citizens, who will become that new traction proletarian horse, which according to their plans should itself bring "THEM" to the necessary "THEM" goals. And these are not such internal problems as many here claim, as external ones. In general, everything is as usual, the war continues, as it was already ...
            Quote: Region 34
            The situation in the United States, good-evil, patriot liberal.

            You see how quietly affects you and not only the author's dope, you have already become a little cosmopolitan)))
      6. -1
        April 25 2016 19: 08
        Quote: cniza
        What did the author want to say or show?



        IMHO, I wanted not to show, but to say: "So I will write utter crap, and you will scratch a melon and wonder what I wanted to say with that. But I will not say." bully
      7. -1
        April 25 2016 19: 55
        Quote: cniza
        What did the author want to say or show?

        The author, like a highly artistic language, made a citizen a moron
        1. +4
          April 25 2016 21: 48
          Quote: Corporal Valera
          Quote: cniza
          What did the author want to say or show?

          The author, like a highly artistic language, made a citizen a moron

          Is the author wrong? Here you are, probably, a citizen. What can you, as a citizen, do? Never mind! You cannot organize an anti-government rally or demonstration, you simply will not be allowed. You with arms in hand will not be able to overthrow the power, they will either shoot you or put you in prison. Once every six years you can only vote for someone. But, the election commission in Moscow will give votes to the people who need the Kremlin. You cannot even withdraw a deputy of the lowest level! Well, who are we, PEOPLE, after that? So it remains only to express your opinion on social networks, maybe this will somehow affect the course of history, and turn the cheeks to the oligarchs and thieves, who twist our pockets.
          1. -2
            April 25 2016 22: 07
            Quote: Алексей_К
            What can you, as a citizen, do? Never mind!

            Yes, you sho? But do not you think that this is a very convenient position?
            Quote: Алексей_К
            You cannot organize an anti-government rally or demonstration, you simply will not be allowed. You with arms in hand will not be able to overthrow the power, they will either shoot you or put you in prison

            Well, you have Napoleonic plans right!
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Once every six years you can only vote for someone. But, the election commission in Moscow will give votes to the people who need the Kremlin. You cannot even withdraw a deputy of the lowest level!

            Believe me, you can do a lot, and much more often than once every six years, but I will not offer anything, or I already feel the minuses.
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Well, who are we, PEOPLE, after that?

            I hope.
            Quote: Алексей_К
            So all that remains is to express our opinion on social networks,

            The possibilities are much greater. Although you also need networks, yeah.
            PySy article. According to the author, a patriot and a liberal are not citizens. These are, like, such equally radical personalities. Mutual, I would say. For the Citizen, he has a separate role. They all beat, kick, and he doesn’t eat anything. In short, a dumb, bully animal. Well, or I did not understand the author, sorry
            1. +2
              April 25 2016 22: 43
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              The possibilities are much greater. Although you also need networks, yeah.

              Well, would you list these possibilities? And so, empty words only. I've listed, but you don’t like everything.
              1. +1
                April 25 2016 22: 59
                Quote: Алексей_К
                Well, would you list these possibilities? And so, empty words only. I've listed, but you don’t like everything.

                In PM, if you want.
                1. aba
                  +1
                  April 26 2016 06: 55
                  In PM, if you want.

                  Yasenko ... Let's say one out loud, and the other only in the ear and even then not to everyone. So it was worth starting a "conversation" ?!
          2. 0
            April 26 2016 09: 57
            Alexey K! 21.48. But this is a true remark! How can anyone really influence power? No way! Just scratch your tongue and all! I do not see any real leverage. Even locally!
      8. +3
        April 25 2016 21: 36
        That we are all _udaki at the play.
        1. SSR
          +2
          April 25 2016 22: 39
          Quote: NordUral
          That we are all _udaki at the play.

          + this is just so. Sorry and you thought that you are managing? )
          Mazanul postvil - in general, plus.
      9. -1
        April 25 2016 21: 47
        C \ p \ a \ h \ a, not the article. What benefit? What did the author want to draw public attention to? I'll go wash my eyes.
      10. +2
        April 25 2016 22: 18
        That this is one gang - a watering can. And nothing more. The people are silent. Citizens, that is.
      11. +1
        April 25 2016 22: 56
        Quote: cniza
        What did the author want to say or show?

        In fact, everything is quite simple. While liberals and patriots play seats in the future parliament, the country's citizens tighten their belts tight. The situation is familiar, repeated every 4 years, and now it will be 5 years. The author is not Tolstoy, for sure. Although trying to mow under Machiavelli.
      12. 0
        April 26 2016 13: 31
        That both liberals and patriots are the fruits of the same tree. it's just that everyone hills up their plot while the "people hawala" ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. -1
      April 25 2016 17: 07
      Strange play nothing.
      1. +14
        April 25 2016 17: 26
        Quote: bronik
        Strange play nothing.

        No matter how, the author made himself a citizen, only a strange citizen turned out request they beat him like a goat, but he just nods his head like a Chinese idiot and allows himself to be beaten, I don’t know with whom the author painted a portrait of such a citizen, probably from himself, in our VO forum, the change would have arrived both left and right. feel
        1. +2
          April 25 2016 18: 25
          , on our VO forum, change would have flown both left and right ,,
          Well, yes, yes. We take (I don’t know, citizen felts, Mr. felts, for someone, probably a comrade) Nadezhdin. Who positions himself as a liberal. In the presidential election he was a confidant (of the current president) and boasted of his diploma , again from the president. on a talk show as soon as he doesn’t attack, the president’s actions. but now he stands for primaries, “united Russia”, can someone be able to explain what it is?
          1. +3
            April 25 2016 22: 00
            So the play is just about that. There is only us - foolish citizens from the 80s, and these "irrepressible owners of factories and steamships, if thinner - houses in Nice and a daily theater for us on various talk shows, with rare splashes of true patriots.
        2. +4
          April 25 2016 20: 53
          Quote: vovanpain
          a strange citizen of some kind turned out to be beaten like a goat, but he just nods like a Chinese blankhead and lets himself beat, I don’t know with whom the author painted a portrait of such a citizen,

          The author was not impressed. If according to Stanislavsky - "I do not believe".
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +5
            April 25 2016 22: 15
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            The author was not impressed. If according to Stanislavsky - "I do not believe".
            I don’t believe either. This is the face of the liberal.
        3. 0
          April 26 2016 10: 06
          Vovanpine! 17.26. I am stealing from this comment! And can you find out how citizens influence the decisions of the authorities? For example, repair of roads or inside houses? You can find out where the authorities so quickly respond to the wishes of the population?
    5. +6
      April 25 2016 17: 13
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Some crap

      From the point of view of banal erudition, every sane individual who theoretically modifies scientific abstraction cannot ignore the tendency of paradoxical illusions
      1. +4
        April 25 2016 17: 50
        Quote: Tim Coconuts
        From the point of view of banal erudition, every sane individual who theoretically modifies scientific abstraction cannot ignore the tendency of paradoxical illusions

        - with this to Gridasov, if possible Yes
    6. +5
      April 25 2016 17: 15
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Some crap

      there is a joke in every joke
    7. +5
      April 25 2016 17: 18
      This "Alexander Roslyakov" and on "Publicist.ru" churns out his comments against Russia. Such dirt is pouring from under his keyboard onto Russia, I can tell you.
    8. +1
      April 25 2016 17: 46
      Quote: RUSOIVAN
      Some crap

      I would even say more - crazy nonsense.
      1. +1
        April 25 2016 21: 30
        Author !!!! Please connect 2 of your relatives to portray them !! And show the video. Then, perhaps, the play will have more +++.
        It’s not beautiful what disrespect for a citizen is and who the author is in this play?
        1. +1
          April 25 2016 22: 01
          Does a citizen respect himself?
        2. 0
          April 26 2016 10: 14
          Reptiloid! 21.30. Come on, blaming the mirror! Don't like the image? I'm not like that?! Well, there are crooked mirrors! You can choose your favorite image. And in the article, everything is correct. A plus!!!
    9. 0
      April 25 2016 20: 02
      I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
      You decide what to do with it.
  2. +4
    April 25 2016 17: 01
    A curtain

    And where to laugh?
    1. +1
      April 25 2016 17: 14
      Quote: V.ic
      And where to laugh?

      where to think?
    2. +2
      April 25 2016 22: 02
      And who said we need to laugh. If you think about it, you will have to cry from hopelessness.
  3. +11
    April 25 2016 17: 02
    crying It’s sad somehow ...
    1. +7
      April 25 2016 17: 06
      Quote: Semen
      It’s sad somehow ...

      Not that word. Sick.
      1. +5
        April 25 2016 17: 15
        Quote: EvgNik
        Sick.

        Similarly.
      2. +2
        April 25 2016 22: 04
        And all because we are a crowd of loners, capable of only splashing out our pain and resentment for the country and for the people. Led in the 80s on a dummy and now slurping to the fullest.
  4. +2
    April 25 2016 17: 03
    Oh, liberals with patriots have already set minuses.
    1. +4
      April 25 2016 17: 10
      Quote: Gardamir
      Oh, liberals with patriots have already set minuses.

      And what was the plus point? So the team did not arrive .. wink
    2. +3
      April 25 2016 17: 35
      Quote: Gardamir
      Oh, liberals with patriots have already set minuses.

      Actually, if you have read this opus, then there is a liberal and a patriot on horseback, and "mutilate" a citizen ...
      Now read your comment and turn on the logic, and maybe then you will understand who should put a minus if it was poured with dirt?
      And then it smells like sadomasochism - you are being humiliated, and you are putting pluses.
      I don’t like to set cons, but I never did this to articles, but I didn’t doubt it smile
      1. +4
        April 25 2016 18: 39
        Quote: Volzhanin2
        then there is a liberal and a patriot on horseback

        I saw no liberal or patriot in the play. Natural pseudo. Pseudo-liberal and pseudo-patriot are ultimately a two-headed hydra. Something like that:
        1. 0
          April 25 2016 22: 05
          A liberal can be a real liberalist, only a patriot is a mummer.
        2. +1
          April 25 2016 22: 10
          Quote: EvgNik
          I saw no liberal or patriot in the play. Natural pseudo.
          I agree. I have a simple test - you need to tell the person "it's time to blame" the patriot will answer - who, liberal, where. lol
        3. The comment was deleted.
  5. +8
    April 25 2016 17: 06
    (The Patriot and the Liberal are removed; the lying Citizen tries to portray something after them, but they don’t turn on him.)


    And what is the moral ... then this work ???
    Looks like sadomasochism ...

    In my opinion, only this ghoul will be pleased with such a tear in RUSSIA ...
    1. +4
      April 25 2016 17: 11
      Great photo good

      Inspired by:
      One, two - Freddy will pick you up, Three, four - lock the door in the apartment, Five, six - Freddy wants to eat you all, Seven, eight - Freddy will come to you without asking, Nine, ten - never sleep children ... laughing
  6. +5
    April 25 2016 17: 09
    I understand that a patriot and a citizen are not exactly the same thing, but why oppose? These two concepts are very similar, as for the liberal, this concept was tried very hard to crap our "liberals" in their view, the "liberal" is when you execute commands from abroad, financed by them, and most importantly you hate your Motherland (Russia)
    1. 0
      April 26 2016 10: 23
      Potapov! 17.09/XNUMX. With a liberal it’s clear. We ourselves are weak. What about patriots? I do not see. Impotents inflate their achievements. That’s the whole difference. And so the article is true. There are no realists. And many commentators are just grown children who believe in fairy tales. Children! It’s time to grow up already! I do not want? Understand. So you want to believe in a good magician fulfilling your desires !?
  7. +2
    April 25 2016 17: 10
    this is nonsense from a squirrel, or the author has a temperature of 42.
  8. 0
    April 25 2016 17: 11
    Still, somehow William our Shakespeare will be closer to me, even if not politically savvy.
  9. +7
    April 25 2016 17: 11
    A wonderful statement of the radicalism of both ideas.
  10. +6
    April 25 2016 17: 13
    That is, a patriot should be ashamed? I’m naive, I thought ... that a patriot ... this is one ... who loves his homeland ... wishes her to be strong, prosperous and independent. And it’s like that. The author’s thought is a patriot = liberal = traitor = and so on and so on. Minus.
    1. +2
      April 25 2016 17: 21
      That is, a patriot should be ashamed?


      The author clearly confuses the concept of a patriot with the concept of a nationalist radical.
      In my understanding, a patriot is a person who loves his people, justice, country and never raises his hands on an innocent and defenseless person who respects such a person.
      You may not like the unjust system in the state, but this does not give the right to limit anybody.
      It is necessary to fight within the framework of the law this way is much more difficult and longer ... the author would need to know simple truths.
      1. +5
        April 25 2016 18: 37
        It is necessary to fight within the framework of the law this way is much more difficult and longer ... the author would need to know simple truths.


        Yes, yes, it is within the framework of this, how is it ... laughing
        The "Declaration of Independence" must be signed and stamped by the Queen of England "I affirm" ... crying

        Where and who gave power "according to the law"? Even our Nikolashka's throne was kicked out from under the ass according to what law?
        The simple truth is that power is taken away, and then the necessary "law" is brought in.
        And the article, the author is ... Well done, well written and elegant. Put the epigraph: ". And the man is still rowing and rowing, and feeding the generals with herrings."

        By the way, the Russian peasant was illiterate, for whom it was written at the time ... request ?
        1. +1
          April 25 2016 19: 58
          Yes, yes, it is within the framework of this, how is it ...

          smile
          Sarcasm is clear ...

          and the other alternative is no better from revolution to the next revolution ...
          and so we run in a circle.
          1. +1
            April 25 2016 20: 25
            Sarcasm is clear ...

            and the other alternative is no better from revolution to the next revolution ...


            + for a sense of humor. smile And between revolutions, power (real) is inherited (well, if the heir has not been poisoned).
            Everywhere and always ... No options.
    2. +7
      April 25 2016 17: 22
      The author’s thought may be a little deeper.
      Imagine two people I am wearing T-shirts with the words "I am a patriot!" and "I am a liberal!" Does it wear them? in some way.
      I will not speak for liberoids. Patriotism? Now I see little patriots. Not those who are tattoos on different parts of the body with a screaming inscription do. This is so, scum.
      Patriots built BAM, built Magnitogorsk, many construction sites of the century. Lay down with bones. This is patriotism. And from the fact that the air was shaken with slogans no one is hot, not cold.
      "Don't ask what your country can do for you. Tell me what you can do for it" J. Kenedy
    3. 0
      April 26 2016 10: 27
      Alexander! 17.13. I look in the book, I see a fig. Comprehend the problem you read? Or like the Americans? Should there be two clearly defined characters, evil-kind?
  11. 0
    April 25 2016 17: 17
    Well, if in this play, if I may say so, a certain amorphous creature is taken for a citizen without his gaze, opinion and position, well then it will probably be so.
  12. +2
    April 25 2016 17: 18
    And the article +++++++ So far, in local administrations, leaders who have not served in the Army cherish party representatives who have not served in the Army, and the People who have served and KNOW how to respond to a given order are simply guarded by orders from higher ones. And this bl @ dw is just kidding ..
  13. +1
    April 25 2016 17: 18
    After the first remark of the liberal, it became clear that the citizen was stammered in the end.)))
    But the patriots here, according to Roslyakov, are vile types!
    A citizen in the final, gets up, swaying and exclaims: "So that's it, Mikhalych !!!"
    So what?
    Nonsense.
  14. +9
    April 25 2016 17: 19
    Put article plus.
    A typical pre-election media talkhouse ...
    The problems of the people, as always, are in the background.
    The meaning is really camouflaged, it makes you strain your brains a little.
    But it is useful. The head is given to a person not only in order to eat ...
  15. +8
    April 25 2016 17: 21
    Reminds disputes on Military Review. A citizen is always guilty
  16. +17
    April 25 2016 17: 27
    The article is, let's say, unfinished. I myself wanted to write something similar under the name "Zigzag of stability", but somehow the spirit is not enough. The point of the article is how I understood that our current government, like the past, consists mainly of majors. In the materials of Mikhail Delyagin, I read about all the characters in our Government, from Medvedev to Sobchak. Just some majors are "offended" oppositionists, others are acting. The acting majors - "patriots" such as Milonov, Matvienko, Masha Kozhevnikova "give out on the mountain" very strange initiatives. Removal of Lenin from the Mausoleum-Milonov. What for? For the Yeltsin Center to play brighter colors? Ministry of Happiness-Matvienko. The Ministry of Happiness in any psychiatry, depending on the dosage of haloperidol. Banning palm oil-Masha Kozhevnikova. A ban is certainly a good thing, but can it go back to national food standards and normal certification? And there are so many such "patriotic" initiatives that they are overwhelmed. Until the official coronation of VVP and his anointing to the kingdom. I understand Putin in the sense that it is impossible to know and control everything alone. But can he still take control of the principles of Li Kuan Yew, the ruler of Singapore? Otherwise we "search" Ksenia Sobchak's apartment, find 1,5 million in euros and dollars, return the money a month later, apologize to Ksyusha. It's the same story with Zhenya Vasilyeva. The girl sits under house arrest, conducts personal exhibitions of paintings, shoots clips, maintains correspondence on Instagram. Then you yourself know what, then they return everything to Zhenya and apologize. Cognitive dissonance naturally occurs in the layman. As for the industry, we have many monopolists in our economy, who are, as it were, "state". How to ask for subsidies and plan to raise tariffs, they are state, how to set exorbitant salaries for top management as they seem to be private. There are practically no management standards, they only now want to work out them, and salaries as "effective owners" are being raised now. In general, such pies with kittens. Think why this is so?
    1. +4
      April 25 2016 17: 56
      + the author wrote about such "patriots" but did not put quotation marks and in fact there is a liberal to liberal strife, but we have grants-sucking ones, they have been mocked at the very bottom of the plinth))
  17. +5
    April 25 2016 17: 33
    And what role does the author assign to himself in this "masterpiece" of drama? Huh?
    1. 0
      April 25 2016 18: 07
      You have confirmed your Nick with your question. I also thought about It .... HOW IT SAID THAT THE MOST SMART QUESTION- which you could not ask.
  18. +2
    April 25 2016 17: 39
    Does the author understand the meaning of the word "patriot" at all? In his understanding, if you don't have a villa in Nice and don't dine at the National, then it is impossible to be one?
    A patriot is a patriotic person - one who loves his homeland, devoted to his people, ready for sacrifices and exploits in the name of the interests of his homeland [1].
    not too lazy, found: read the author!
    1. 0
      April 26 2016 10: 37
      Russoivan! 17.39. Understand! Patriot is like a faithful wife having a bunch of lovers but having a marriage certificate with one! She loves her husband (if not divorced).
  19. +1
    April 25 2016 17: 40
    Vile libel ...
  20. 0
    April 25 2016 17: 55
    Quote: ImperialKolorad

    I would even say more - crazy nonsense.

    I'm not a doctor: diagnoses are to them)
  21. +9
    April 25 2016 18: 03
    "... There won't be these 90% percent, 10% will just bend .."
    Unfortunately no! 10% are already doing well (not in Russia, of course), yachts, ski lodges, it is true, have risen in price, well, dyk, nothing, 90% will bend, as usual and will be reimbursed ...! Yesterday I watched the government meeting: Putin has the palest faces and Lavrova, the rest with brick-tanned, indecent faces - Ulyukaev, Siluanov and other "infantry" ... am ! I have such a tan hari after a week's stay on the melting ice of the tundra lakes, although I also choke on caviar, only pike and salted ... For "black" - they will put, to "red" - far away ... Moscow- the capital of true caviar gourmets! recourse
  22. 0
    April 25 2016 18: 16
    "Citizen" is like a vanka-vstanka laughing
  23. +1
    April 25 2016 18: 30
    I didn’t understand anything and I lost nothing without understanding.
    1. 0
      April 25 2016 23: 21
      Yeah ?! And me, here, as it struck by lightning: Ksenia wrote, damn it ..! Well, maybe not Ksyusha, but Khryusha, but she wrote anyway, but what the hell is in VO ?!
      1. 0
        April 26 2016 00: 43
        I apologize to Piggy, the grandchildren said: Piggy has enough worries even without this crap - children need to be entertained, and not to hang out in VO.
      2. 0
        April 27 2016 00: 24
        Offended by "Ksyusha" - minus!
  24. 0
    April 25 2016 18: 32
    Along the way, the author of Shakespeare’s laurels is not given rest. So he is not here, but in the BDT!
    1. +1
      April 26 2016 01: 10
      So they wrapped it from the BDT, said: take a walk from here, read Shakespeare, and it brought him to VO.
  25. +3
    April 25 2016 18: 34
    There is another wave of hitting Patriotism (as in the 90s, who remembers) ... And with such statues, it all starts!
  26. +1
    April 25 2016 18: 37
    And where is an example, who is right, who do you follow, who is a bastard? It would be simpler.
    1. 0
      April 25 2016 23: 10
      Do not strain you so! It was just that yesterday there was a graduation ceremony at Skvortsov-Stepanov, and through an oversight of the head physician, some of the graduates were presented with laptops. So you be careful about "simpler"! The chief doctor, by the way, liked your comment.
  27. 0
    April 25 2016 18: 42
    Quote: Volzhanin2
    I didn't get that shit either. It is clear that the author is a great playwright, but apparently my level is small for understanding such a masterpiece.

    What is not clear here?
    Auto writes that everything around pd ... sy, one "citizen" and the author, of course, is in a white coat, and the inveterate villains of the opposing sides whip him on the devstven cheeks.
    This song is from the series "there is no difference between Stalin and Hitler" and "where can the poor peasant go".
    A pleased, well-known form of ideological warfare is to sow confusion in the minds of as many citizens as possible, try to convince them that they are bright unique personalities, and owe nothing to anyone. Neither the country nor those around it - to anyone.
    Well, a familiar song?
  28. +4
    April 25 2016 18: 45
    I sang on a notebook
    And Muse was enough to stop it ... what
  29. +2
    April 25 2016 18: 45
    read it. put a minus. in this situation, both would get in the face, both a liberal and ""! negative
    1. -1
      April 25 2016 20: 27
      Quote: Victor Demchenko
      read it. put a minus. in this situation, both would get in the face, both a liberal and ""! negative

      The liberal would not have time, they are nimble, and run fast ...
  30. +1
    April 25 2016 20: 13
    The article did not like.
    Firstly, because in their dialogue, an ordinary citizen is not present. Citizens of the country go about their business - some are trying to start living, others are surviving, others are surviving.
    Secondly, there are more parties, they try to shout at each other at once, which makes their position slurred, which, however, corresponds to reality.
    It was possible to put a third person, a representative of the media, as a conductor.
    In fact, on the eve of the elections, those wishing to remain with deputy mandates have intensified.
    From everywhere there are speeches about the problems that they themselves gave rise to.
    And solutions to problems do not sound.
    The Communist Party has a good idea, it is this party that has a historic chance to rectify the situation, but, beyond the slogans, the matter does not go.
    All party activization is aimed at voicing slogans with the sole purpose of breaking through to power.
    Take the same overhaul.
    It must be carried out and people understand this, but the measures developed are aimed at increasing the suction of funds from the pockets of the population and transferring to the pockets of businessmen without the intention to solve the urgent problem. Raising money for overhaul is long money for some for personal use, for others it’s a common opportunity unfasten in your pocket, etc. And for political parties, this is PR.
    The authorities do not have those who would not be engaged in suction, but really solve problems. For every problem has a solution.
  31. 0
    April 25 2016 20: 25
    ... You come to me ... and hit me on the cheek - right, say!
    ... Not like asking questions like "are you for Putin or against?" - and it won't reach the left cheek !!!
    ------------------
    Now there are few indifferents, and people are silent with meaning! Just swipe! ...
  32. +1
    April 25 2016 20: 29
    The playwright is definitely a genius. Not only contemporaries do not understand him (a sign of genius), he and his descendants will not understand. And this is a sure sign of the greatest genius. You read it like this and no, no, yes, let’s think, maybe it’s not worth all to learn writing in a row? what
    1. 0
      April 26 2016 02: 06
      A brilliant genius is brilliant! And to teach genius writing is blatant antigenism!
  33. +2
    April 25 2016 21: 38
    Urgently send a doctor to the author! Schizophrenia and a split personality of the video with the naked eye!
  34. +2
    April 25 2016 21: 40
    With such abilities, you need to exercise in the Literary newspaper (does it, by the way, still exist?).
  35. +1
    April 25 2016 22: 54
    And, you, afftorr, for whom will you be: for the "Bolsheviks", or for the "communists"? Ah-ah, I understand, I understand - you are for the "citizen"! So what the hell are you doing here - you need to "rain" or "echo"!
  36. 0
    April 26 2016 05: 22
    Normally written. At least in terms of
    that all these screamers earn a pretty penny on us.
  37. +1
    April 26 2016 07: 33
    Unfortunately, the feuilleur-man didn’t come out ... For a blatant attempt to say that a citizen is being kicked from both sides, there is one interesting nuance that worries me - if it is indicated about the patriot how hard he hits the citizen, but not about the liberal. An interesting compote is obtained.
    So right
    Quote: bannik
    Ah-ah, I understand, I understand - you are for the "citizen"! So what the hell are you doing here - you need to "rain" or "echo"!

    And also about my own feelings - I felt myself disgusted, after reading this attempt on a feuilleton ...
  38. 0
    April 26 2016 07: 38
    Quote: Ros 56
    Waiting for apparently 17 years


    But indeed, the October coup is 100 years old next year. But what will happen? On the one hand, there will be enough blood and violence, but, on the other hand, as it is sung in the song "Corrosion of Metal" "The Power of Evil": "We will build a golden world on ruins, the power of Death and Black Mist!"