Military Review

Washington's suffering due to the suspension in Russia of the activity of the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people”

32
Last week, passions flared up in Western democracies over the decision of the Ministry of Justice of Russia on 18 of April to recognize the “Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people” as an extremist organization and suspend its activities in the country. The head of the US Department of State press service, John Kirby, called on the Russian authorities to reverse this decision. A similar statement was made by the representation of the European Union in Ukraine, individual European politicians.


Washington's suffering due to the suspension in Russia of the activity of the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people”


Self-appointed Majlis on the warpath

History the confrontation of the Crimean Tatar Majlis with the Russian authorities began with a referendum on the accession of Crimea to Russia. At that time, the leaders of the organization tried to bargain for themselves the conditions to represent the entire Crimean Tatar people. Did not work out. In Moscow, they were well aware that the entire 33 was included in the composition of the Mejlis. They are elected kurultaem from 250 people. According to expert estimates, this entire superstructure was based on approximately six percent of the Crimean Tatars. But she enjoyed support abroad, mainly in Turkey. Moreover, for many years, the Majlis, who called himself “the parliament of the Crimean Tatar people,” did not bother with official registration.

The lack of social and legal responsibility made it possible to self-seize the Crimean lands, “protect” the business, arbitrarily dispose of the funds of the sponsors. Not accidentally, well acquainted with the situation on the peninsula, the head of the Republic of Crimea Sergey Aksyonov called the Majlis a “semi-criminal structure”.

Without bargaining with Moscow, the leaders of the Majlis began to convince the Crimean Tatars that their very resettlement from Central Asia to their historic homeland was provided by an independent Ukraine, and there was no need to expect anything from Russia except repression. The population is on guard. Only a sixth of the Crimean Tatars came to the referendum, which the leaders of the Majlis later speculated on at all political levels.

Soon life took its toll. Crimean Tatars began to actively cooperate with the Russian authorities. Created new national public organizations. The largest of them - the “Crimea” - has long surpassed the possibilities of the advertised Majlis. Activists of these organizations went to the municipal and state service, where they now serve the interests of the country and their people.

In January, European politicians decided to check how comfortable the Tatars in Crimea are today. The Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Thorbjørn Jagland, sent a representative delegation to Simferopol. It includes Ambassador Gerard Stoudman and members of the organization’s secretariat. The declared purpose of the visit is “to assess the state of human rights”.

The last week of January, the delegation traveled around the peninsula. She monitored seven topics - law enforcement, disappearances, the judicial system, the penitentiary system, the Crimean Tatars and other minorities, freedom of religion, freedom of expression and freedom of the media, freedom of assembly, education and humanitarian issues. The delegation held over fifty meetings in Simferopol, Yalta, Sevastopol and Bakhchisarai.

The interlocutors of the Council of Europe envoys, as noted in the report, were “numerous representatives of civil society, non-governmental organizations, religious societies, national minorities, including the Crimean Tatars”, as well as media workers and officials of local power structures. The delegation of the Council of Europe was given the opportunity to meet with the arrested deputy head of the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people” Ahtem Chiygoz.

What the mission of the Council of Europe saw in Crimea

Not particularly hoping for the objectivity of the European delegates, the head of the Crimean-Tatar movement “Kyrym” (“Crimea”) Remzi Ilyasov made a special statement to the press: “The Crimean Tatars expect that the truth about their life in the Russian Crimea will be reflected in the final report of the Council of Europe mission ".

Remzi Ilyasov had reason to be concerned. By the time the delegation of the Council of Europe visited the Crimea, the active member of the Majlis had already moved to the Kherson region of Ukraine. There he took up the usual land squatting, but his main business was to harm the Crimea and the Crimeans, including his fellow tribesmen. On the Ukrainian-Russian border, activists of the Majlis staged a food blockade of the peninsula, then an energy blockade, impeded the movement of people and transport, made terrorist appeals.

On this basis, the Republic Prosecutor’s Office appealed to the Supreme Court of Crimea with a lawsuit in which it requested “to recognize as extremist and ban the“ Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people ”, whose leaders initiated the blockade of the Crimea”. In late March, the court began to consider the claim. This is not a quick matter, because prior to the decision of the Supreme Court, the prosecutor’s office, by its special resolution, suspended the activities of the “public association“ Majlis of the Crimean Tatar People ”. Last Monday, on the basis of this decision of the Crimean Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Justice of Russia introduced the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people” to the list of organizations whose work was suspended due to extremist activities.

Exactly by this date the report of the Council of Europe’s monitoring mission for January has ripened. He caused conflicting feelings and the possibility of alternative citation. Western media and some liberal publications in Russia, for example, are hooked on the provisions of the report, which deals with repression in the Crimea. There are references to “disproportionate use of force” during searches, cases of “disappearances among Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars”. It is especially emphasized that the recognition of the Majlis as an extremist organization will be "a new level of repression against the Crimean Tatars."

Objective observers draw attention to the clarification in the report that the cases of repression "seem to be directed at individual opponents - in particular, the Crimean Tatars or Ukrainians - rather than reflecting the policy of collective repression against the Crimean Tatars as an ethnic group."

The head of the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people” Refat Chubarov categorically disagreed with this conclusion of the monitoring mission’s report. Last Wednesday, he spoke at a PACE session in Strasbourg and criticized the report, the drafters of which did not see that “the policy of extermination is being carried out against the Crimean Tatar people by the occupation authorities”.

However, after the trip of the monitoring mission, such accusations no longer find a response even from the anti-Russian Council of Europe. At least, Chubarov’s abrupt speech made CE Secretary General Thorbjørn Jagland cancel the previously scheduled meeting, at which the head of the Majlis intended to convey his assessment of the report and concern to the commission’s conclusions by the Council of Europe head.

However, this step of Jagland should not be overestimated. The irritation of the European politician largely caused the instructive, mentor tone of the Crimean Tatar demanding the Council of Europe that international missions in Crimea fulfill “the institution of the Commissioner for Human Rights, the relevant committees dealing with human rights, and monitoring on their behalf would be more objective and consistent with the real the state of things in the Crimea. "

Jagland could not tolerate such an address to himself. And maybe he understood that to defend today the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people”, accused of extremist activity in Russia, means taking responsibility for the energy and food blockade of the Crimea, for all the actions of the organization that forced the Justice Ministry Russia to make it to the list of extremist.

In Washington in this respect do not bother. They have their own experience of culturing extremist and terrorist organizations: from the ever-memorable Al-Qaida to today's ISIS. Against this background, the "Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people" still seems white and fluffy. Only life shows: extremists do not stop at small. They must stop the power. What the prosecutor's office of the Crimea and the Ministry of Justice of Russia have done now. Washington's suffering over the Majlis will not interfere with their actions ...
Author:
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. siberko
    siberko April 25 2016 07: 09
    +14
    That's right .... it was necessary to declare them another terrorist organization, so that the tail is pressed ... hyenas
    1. Diana Ilyina
      Diana Ilyina April 25 2016 10: 32
      +27
      A burnt pancake, "Mejlis", "Kurultai", they would have remembered the Crimean horde, some kind of Middle Ages. Crimea is the territory of Russia, and on its territory the laws of the Russian Federation apply, that's it! I have never heard that our Tatars had some kind of separate governing body a la "kurultai". Crimean Tatars are the same ethnos as everyone else, living on the territory of Russia, having the same rights as other peoples of the Russian Federation and even more. No need to kiss these people in the ass, they are no better than the rest. We rush about with all minorities like him with a sieve, but in the end we (the Russians) will still be left out in the cold, and we will also have some kind of "repression" and "oppression" of innocent sheep. Look, the West is concerned about the rights of the Crimean Tatars and Ukrainians, and why does the West never care about the rights of Russian-speaking people in the Donbass or the Baltic states ?! It is necessary to drive in the neck all this riffraff from the OSCE, this European trash heap, no matter how we try to look good, no one will appreciate it!
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev April 25 2016 13: 59
        +1
        Quote: Diana Ilyina
        A burnt pancake, "Mejlis", "Kurultai", they would have remembered the Crimean horde, some kind of Middle Ages. Crimea is the territory of Russia, and on its territory the laws of the Russian Federation apply, that's it! I have never heard that our Tatars had some kind of separate governing body a la "kurultai". Crimean Tatars are the same ethnos as everyone else, living on the territory of Russia, having the same rights as other peoples of the Russian Federation and even more. No need to kiss these people in the ass, they are no better than the rest. We rush about with all minorities like him with a sieve, but in the end we (the Russians) will still be left out in the cold, and we will also have some kind of "repression" and "oppression" of innocent sheep. Look, the West is concerned about the rights of the Crimean Tatars and Ukrainians, and why does the West never care about the rights of Russian-speaking people in the Donbass or the Baltic states ?! It is necessary to drive in the neck all this riffraff from the OSCE, this European trash heap, no matter how we try to look good, no one will appreciate it!
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana April 25 2016 19: 32
          +4
          I will say a little abstractly, but to the point. Why are there any squeals against the Russian Federation from the Baltic countries, Ukraine, Brussels, Turkey, etc.?
          The West always in its actions proceeds from its geopolitical logic.
          Remarkably, the advice. time real geopolitical logic of the West advice. people were not taught, but taught Marxism. Marxism relied on the “proletarian” internationalism, which was reckless on nationality. To criticism m / l. theories in scientific CPSU research has tabooed, and the defense of dissertations using the dialectical materialist. The method has also become secretly banned since 1986. Ie. just with the coming to power of M. Gorbachev with his so-called "New thinking." It is also noteworthy that the historical features of the coming to power of the Bolsheviks became more known already in the post-Soviet. time. Therefore, it was previously not entirely clear why in the USSR under Stalin in the 1930s there was repression and for what it was repressed. Just not so long ago they began to say that in fact, after Lenin’s death, there were 2 parties fighting in power in the country: the Stalin party for building a sovereign socialist. the state and Trotsky’s party, which, in effect, enters into the transfer of Soviet Russia to foreign external control. Trotskyists were repressed before WWII. At the same time, the audience was also not told why there were 2 trends in the Communist Party. How did this happen?
          1. M / l. the theory was nevertheless built in many respects on abstract - idealized - representations - for example, on the so-called "Proletarian internationalism", etc. .. 2. The listeners were not told anything about who financed February as well. bourgeois, and October. revolution. Psychology of the masses and logic in universities by nephilosophist. specialties were also not taught. TOTAL As a result, a counter-bourgeois revolution took place in the country - Gorbachev dissolved the CPSU and the USSR, and with it the entire socialist system, was liquidated.
          So, while the citizens of the USSR were stuffed to a certain degree with erroneous Marxist theories, in the West such a science as geopolitics, which has actually been at least 400 years old, has developed, but I will not dwell on this, I’ll just say the main thing, because, if we do not understand the rules of this geopolitical “game” of the West with Russia and do not develop adequate protection measures for ourselves, then Russia can really cease to exist, and its peoples will be destroyed by 90-80%, and the remaining ones will be assimilated with the enemy West.
          The geopolitics of the United States and the collective West view any situation in the world through the logical prism of the confrontation between Russia and the West in the framework of the great war of the continents. They divide the world into 2 civilization camps - the Atlantic, moderated by the United States (or rather, the US Federal Reserve) and the Eurasian, with Russia at its center. The Atlantic evolved like the civilization of the SEA with its inherent predatory raids on peoples on various coasts of SUSHI cultivation. The Eurasian evolved as a SUSHI civilization. And so it went on for centuries. Civilization of the SEA robbed the SUSHI civilization. The task of civilization of the SEA is to enslave the civilization of SUSHI, and above all, as task No. 1, Russia and the Russian people, who cement it as a sovereign state. From here in the West fierce Russophobia is brought up under any political economy. system of Russia.
          Therefore, Westerners are completely unimportant whether international laws and regulations are respected or not respected. rights anywhere - but not in their countries! - and what politic. forces there participate in internal political processes (terrorists, fascists, ethno-nationalists, Islamists), and it is democratic or not. For the West, the MAIN THING is done in the geopolitical interests of the West (USA) or in the interests of Russia. The same attitude of the USA towards the EU countries. The United States just needs to have free space to ensure the life of its global globalist elite, to which the US Federal Reserve financial capitalists belong.
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev April 25 2016 14: 15
      +2
      Quote: siberko
      That's right .... it was necessary to declare them another terrorist organization, so that the tail is pressed ... hyenas
    3. Arkhan
      Arkhan April 25 2016 20: 07
      0
      I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
      You decide what to do with it.
  2. VP
    VP April 25 2016 07: 20
    +11
    With these statements, the United States, in fact, takes responsibility for everything that the Chubarovites would not soak in the future.
    The states, in fact, were substituted. Not from a great mind, they did it.
    Since they have no influence on this Majlis, Chubarov is subordinate only to the Turks.
  3. ovod84
    ovod84 April 25 2016 07: 38
    +2
    They always suffer or are preoccupied with something, find a woman to calm down or tired of Europe with ukrami to tear.
  4. Egoza
    Egoza April 25 2016 07: 46
    +12
    The fugitive head of the banned Mejlis in the Russian Federation, Refat Chubarov, believes that the Crimean Tatars are better than other peoples because of the presence of a special gene.

    The politician made this scandalous statement in an interview with the Kiev site Apostrof.

    “When they ask me:“ What are you better than others? ”, I say that you can’t compare peoples, but some of them have their own peculiarities due to their history. And if we talk about the Crimean Tatars, then they are more sensitive to issues of good and evil, truth and lies, since they had to survive for decades in such conditions, ”he said.

    Chubarov believes that this “historical gene” is strong in most Crimean Tatars.

    and this is why the Crimean Tatars so joyfully supported the fascists! The genes are to blame! like the SS Galicia! These are relatives!
    1. VP
      VP April 25 2016 08: 30
      +3
      He does not have a special gene, he has an extra chromosome, the 47th.
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev April 25 2016 14: 17
      +1
      And not only that, they dreamed and are dreaming of living under the Turks.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 25 2016 07: 52
    +7
    The suffering of Washington is his own business. But sooner or later they will realize that this one and a half meter with a cap is a threat to the Crimean Tatars themselves. They can understand and understand, but they will not voice it.
  6. beer-youk
    beer-youk April 25 2016 07: 55
    +2
    In this case, the saying about a speck and a log is very appropriate!
  7. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 25 2016 07: 55
    +8
    Islyamov in one interview says: I won’t take off my uniform until the Crimea is liberated, we’ll have to see and die in it.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid April 25 2016 08: 04
      +3
      So the vile stench will spread from him even during his lifetime .... He will not take off, he doesn’t wash, he doesn’t change his clothes ... Class! His own invention.
      Let the Americans better remember about their Indians, suffer, cry.
  8. 31rus2
    31rus2 April 25 2016 08: 04
    +6
    Dear, this is nothing more than interference in the interests of Russia and it is time for our "partners" to pin down their noses
  9. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec April 25 2016 08: 04
    +3
    If some kind of gang creates problems for society, then it must be removed. Everything is very simple.
  10. Fotoceva62
    Fotoceva62 April 25 2016 08: 25
    +6
    I wonder why European politicians do not care about the fate of the inhabitants of Donbass, the citizens of Ukraine killed Bandera or missing in Ukrainian cities?
    The question is rhetorical. If the Mejlis and Banderlog now killed Russian people in Crimea and Sevastopol, would Europe be very worried? The corpse-eaters, the ghouls of the civilizers are bad, they couldn’t settle in the Crimea, the base in Sevastopol broke off.
    It did not work again, as in the years of the Great Patriotic War, to use the Tatars (Crimean Turks) for their own purposes, so they are furious. These gentlemen will soon have no time for checks, ISIS will help.
  11. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 25 2016 08: 30
    +2
    Each nation has its own "Majlis".
    And the fewer the people, the more he is ...
    Especially when there is external recharge.
  12. Silhouette
    Silhouette April 25 2016 08: 55
    +4
    Mejlis is the Tatar "Cosa Nostra". Let the EU better fight the Sicilian mafia, and not poke around in Crimea. Why hasn't all the business in Crimea been liquidated by all these Bandera shortcomings from the Mejlis? Why won't all Kherson emigrants be deprived of the right to enter Crimea?
  13. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky April 25 2016 09: 08
    +6
    Quote: Pvi1206
    Each nation has its own "Majlis". And the smaller the people, the more bullies they are ... Especially when there is external support.

    So we need to demand the abolition of such entities in the United States as the reservation and return of land to the indigenous peoples of America.
  14. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin April 25 2016 09: 28
    +4
    The answer to America should be so harsh and unambiguous as not to allow further speculation on this topic. And once and for all close this question.
    All in all, it’s all right — to carry a scruff and a nose across the table.
  15. atamankko
    atamankko April 25 2016 10: 19
    +1
    Suffering for all the jackals of the world
    it's hard to be "exceptional"
    if you have to defend such an abomination.
  16. iouris
    iouris April 25 2016 11: 27
    +1
    Mejlis can be arranged in Brussels, in Paris and Berlin. This is even more interesting.
  17. Shustov
    Shustov April 25 2016 12: 39
    +2
    At the same time, to prohibit all sorts of prominent Christian sects such as "Jehovah's Witnesses", all sorts of Assemblies of God and different interpretations in the names associated with God, except for the ROC, judge and disperse all obscurantists in Canada and the United States at the same time, damn it, where you saw the Indians wearing a balalaika near the Russian Orthodox Church, well, our Slavs are stupid everywhere their brains are ready to give if only fed for free.
  18. Obolensky
    Obolensky April 25 2016 12: 39
    +1
    Let the USA "decide" in their country, we will somehow figure it out without them.
  19. dep071
    dep071 April 25 2016 13: 24
    +1
    Quote: iouris
    Mejlis can be arranged in Brussels, in Paris and Berlin. This is even more interesting.


    Good idea. I would add Washington to this list.
  20. 7 poplar
    7 poplar April 25 2016 14: 07
    0
    Well, if they suffer like this, let them open the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people in America !!!
  21. MarKon
    MarKon April 25 2016 15: 11
    0
    In the photo - everything is in the papakhas of astrakhan, all colonels, however) Fashion or something like that?
  22. koshmarik
    koshmarik April 25 2016 17: 28
    +1
    Obama! Give the Communist Party in the USA! And we will look and solve the issue with the Majlis. There is another option - let the Americans take it for themselves and live in peace.
  23. Magabi
    Magabi April 25 2016 18: 46
    0
    How they already teased.
  24. VOENOBOZ
    VOENOBOZ April 25 2016 18: 53
    0
    Command at home, but the State Department is not a decree for us.
  25. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad April 25 2016 23: 27
    +1
    Why didn't the ameropods keep the Occupy Walt Street movement! Sufferers of x ... renova.
  26. mayhem
    mayhem April 26 2016 00: 07
    +1
    so much money they plowed into him and into this project, so much time they raised it there, and then they banned it, it’s insulting))) I myself grew up from those parts, the Turks didn’t like the Tatars, they got into disputes right there, they and didn’t live near, but here as fate made us unite)))
    I think our special services need to quarrel, there are all the Turks with the Tatars, the National Guard and they themselves will destroy))