Military Review

Media: Washington expects Germany to strengthen its military presence in the east of NATO

46
Washington demanded that Germany and Britain deploy troops and equipment on the eastern flank of the alliance - in the Baltic States, Poland and Romania; Look a message from the magazine Spiegel.




"The United States expects, above all, Great Britain and Germany to deploy troops and military equipment in the Baltic countries, Poland and Romania," the magazine writes.

According to the sources of the publication, “Barack Obama intends to touch on this issue at the mini-summit of leaders of the USA, Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy scheduled for April in 25 in Hannover.”

“Germany is thus under increasing pressure,” the magazine notes.

At the same time, the author recalls that “Berlin, during the discussion of this topic, always behaved with restraint, since the Bundeswehr was already involved in the formation of a new NATO response force and gave its consent to participate in them before the 2020 year.”

As previously reported, the issue of a new mission of the alliance, aimed at enhancing the protection of Eastern European countries from the "Russian threat", will be decided at the next July NATO summit to be held in Warsaw.
Photos used:
slavyanskaya-kultura.ru
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr April 24 2016 08: 22
    +6
    Increase military spending. Amerikos is used by Aunt Merkel as they want. Bent earlier, will bend now.
    1. CORNET
      CORNET April 24 2016 08: 29
      +13
      We took Berlin a couple of times ... Paris took ... Washington’s turn has obviously arrived, the Yankees are impudent!
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana April 24 2016 18: 26
        0
        When someone occupies a high post in their country and offers something, especially in politics, then you need to have an idea from the person who says, offering it something, and take into account its real capabilities.
        For example, Merkel, which is really at everyone's hearing.
        Here is a very interesting characterization of the personality of Angela Dorothea Merkel herself, which, as the author-analyst points out a long time ago, from childhood, is carried out by the US secret services according to the professional continuity of her father.
        Merkel is an ordinary ordinary PhD-system for the formation of the GDR. Behind her back, a chemical scientist, there are no discoveries claiming the Nobel Prize, there are not even works that experts cite.
        Such as she is tens of thousands only in Germany.
        She is not a politician, but such is our time that after the media worked on her image, she became a politician and turned into a leading woman in the world.
        But why did she choose from among many applicants. The first and most important reason is that she is nobody. She has no roots. A. Merkel is not German, not Polish, and moreover not Jewish, and this makes her very valuable copies, because she does not have attachments related to belonging to any nationality. This means that there can be no sympathy for her neighbor. Such characters in many spawned the American selection system. Among them are Z. Brzezinski, who still cannot figure out who he is by nationality, M. Albright, and many others.
        Merkel plays politics, as he puts experiments in a chemical laboratory. She is not interested in the opinions of others, because people of this mindset have only one authority - she herself.
        The second and no less important reason for her choice among applicants is that she is easily controlled through her inherent complexes. A nondescript appearance, heightened ambitions of an outstanding personality, fear of going into the unknown.
        You will say that this is impossible, because she is a self-sufficient person.
        Remember Yeltsin. A more stubborn and stubborn person is difficult to find. But if it was required to break through some question, it was not worthwhile to persuade him. It was necessary to formulate a request and voice it through an unpleasant person. Yeltsin gave the command to fulfill the request with accuracy - on the contrary. It turns out that an uncontrollable person was very easily controlled. And besides this, there are many more ways to manipulate.
        Therefore, we ask ourselves whether it is worth writing about such people. Maybe it wouldn’t be worth it if this person were not the Chancellor of Germany and through her the plans destroying stability in Europe were not realized.
        Using her example, it is worth showing what the model of American democratic liberalism brought to Europe. The model, thanks to which people without political charisma rule the modern world: ignorant Bushes, chemists Merkel, Obama's teachers, financiers Hollande.
        For comparison, I will announce the names: Churchill, Thatcher, Stalin, Lenin, de Gaulle, Bismarck, Adenauer, Roosevelt - did you feel the difference?
        See in detail. Sergey Romanov-Strogalov. “Angela Dorothea Merkel - The Failed Great Woman of Germany” from 15.12.2014. -
        http://politrussia.com/world/angela-doroteya-merkel-997/
        I advise you to read it completely. Very competent political analytics on the characteristics and behavior of A. Merkel.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana April 24 2016 19: 22
          0
          james
          I do not want to say anything bad about women, but mind you, as soon as something connected in politics with dirty, unscrupulous and simply mean, so more and more Westerners are led by "women".

          You correctly noticed, but did not understand why this is happening.
          The fact that exposing a woman to such high posts is an important psychological technique for the men who stand behind them to evade these men from responsibility.
          For example, this technique was used by psychologists during the collapse of his financial pyramid "MMM", whom Mavrodi hired to save his personal life from the hand-to-hand anger of the angry crowd of investors he had deceived, and also to simply keep the crowd from pogrom the main office while to evacuate with the loot abroad. Therefore, for this, instead of Mavrodi, a woman psychologist who was allegedly a high-ranking employee of MMM constantly communicated and spoke to the people with the crowd of robbed MMM depositors on his behalf at the risk of her own life. Moreover, psychologists for this role deliberately chose the WOMAN, not the MAN. It is noteworthy that no one from the crowd even asked about her identity documents, or who she actually works in the company and whether she works at all. And she gave people bliss-reassuring bluff promises, urging everyone to just wait a little while the situation was cleared up. As a result of dragging out the time to "clarify" the situation and NOT submitting a timely application against Mavrodi to the prosecutor's office, Mavrodi successfully hid from depositors with all the stolen money, if I am not mistaken, right abroad. It took Mavrodi, in my opinion, a month. And the lady psychologist, who during all this time pretended to be almost the main employee of "MMM" and urged the victims of Mavrodi to wait, immediately disappeared from sight, and the lock on the doors of the main office of "MMM" hung forever.
          The fact is that, according to the laws of psychology, women are trusted more in vital matters than men, since it is believed that a woman, as a physically weak and fearful being, will not lie to people - she will simply be afraid of physical retribution. This is an erroneous opinion, for there may be exceptions to any rule. Firstly, a woman can also be bribed for a lot of money, which makes her "lose" her head. Secondly, she can also be manipulated if she has a pronounced inferiority complex. (Hence, many women leaders are ugly from a young age.) A man, psychologically, compared to women, is characterized by adventurism and perseverance due to the superiority of his physical data. As a result, it is sometimes easier to pressure a woman leader than a man. This feature of the psychological difference between men and women began to be widely used in the West in psychological wars in countries with external control. Namely, if the Minister of Defense is a woman, then this, as a rule, is done by the authorities not because of their professional military training and suitability for waging war, but only for appearance - so that the population of the country would more trust in their comprador government representatives who are under external control. Behind her, the decision is still made by military men, as a rule, from other countries. Currently from the USA.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. gg.na
        gg.na April 24 2016 19: 02
        0
        Quote: CORNET
        Washington’s turn has obviously arrived, the Yankees are impudent!

        And impudent and greyhound! Seem to be am the barzometer rolls over.
    2. Proxima
      Proxima April 24 2016 08: 33
      +4
      Quote: oleg-gr
      Increase military spending. Amerikos is used by Aunt Merkel as they want. Bent earlier, will bend now.

      Naturally. And what do you think, why is it now fashionable to appoint women to senior posts, right up to the post of president? Are they so smart or for the sake of political correctness? Just a woman is very easy to control (manipulate). There are, of course, exceptions confirming the rules.
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K April 24 2016 08: 57
        +13
        The Germans, like a soldier, should not be underestimated. The warriors are literate, pedantic ... But ...
        Under the leadership of the new Minister of Defense of Germany, a former gynecologist - Ursula von der Leyen, they became similar to the service staff of the operating room. To give a ride, take it, give it ... request
        1. barsik92090
          barsik92090 April 24 2016 15: 58
          0
          To in pure English, you must swallow the tongue in the ass.
        2. barsik92090
          barsik92090 April 24 2016 15: 58
          0
          To in pure English, you must swallow the tongue in the ass.
        3. dauria
          dauria April 24 2016 18: 26
          0
          The Germans, like a soldier, should not be underestimated. The warriors are literate, pedantic ....



          If they are literate, perhaps they will recall that Danzig is Gdansk ... laughing Poles, haven't you strained yet?
      2. WKS
        WKS April 24 2016 09: 32
        0
        Quote: Proxima
        Just a woman is very easy to control (manipulate).

        It’s easy to control a stupid woman, and a smart woman rules herself. This was noticed long ago by the French and even came up with a catch phrase - Cherchez la femme (Sherche la fam).
        1. Proxima
          Proxima April 24 2016 10: 59
          +1
          Quote: wks

          It’s easy to control a stupid woman, and a smart woman rules herself.

          A clever woman is an exception (Catherine the Great, Thatcher), but in this case, we are talking about Merkel and those like her, and "Shershe la femme" is a slightly different opera. Take the trouble to look for what this means in Russian not in a literal translation.
    3. Kostyar
      Kostyar April 24 2016 09: 20
      +3
      Media: Washington expects Germany to strengthen its military presence in the east of NATO

      What to be an occupied country ... formerly "exceptional" and to carry out the commands of a negro from overseas ...?!
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 24 2016 09: 20
      +13
      the question of a new alliance mission aimed at strengthening the defense of Eastern European countries from the “Russian threat” will be decided at the next July NATO summit, which will be held in Warsaw

      Well, yes, yes, it is Russia that surrounds the peace-loving NATO with military bases. Well, if anything, these bases will be the first to eat "Topol" or "Iskander". yes
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. siberalt
      siberalt April 24 2016 09: 55
      +2
      Again, the Anglo-Saxons drive the German east. Is science really not for the future? Yes, only this time to go back, and at home they have Turks and Negroes, and wives and daughters in a burqa laughing
      1. Roman 11
        Roman 11 April 24 2016 10: 33
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        Again, the Anglo-Saxons drive the German east.

        It’s better for them (Germans) on the contrary - to the west ..... well, they would repeat it, and we would help them free themselves laughing
        And then, the fools will go east as if in a vicious circle ...... it’s clear that this is a diagnosis, science is powerless request
    7. Arkhan
      Arkhan April 25 2016 20: 11
      0
      I don’t want to prove anything to you. Just leave it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQpIZ4SdSUY
      You decide what to do with it.
  2. demiurg
    demiurg April 24 2016 08: 27
    +3
    And what to place Germany? They have 2-3 full-fledged tank regiments. The teutons were crushed.
    1. Dryuya2
      Dryuya2 April 24 2016 08: 51
      +3
      Quote: demiurg
      They have 2-3 full-fledged tank regiments. The teutons were crushed.

      skaklov will be called
      *********
      2014 video, but I didn’t even see it request . You can start watching from 1.20 min.
      Isn’t it really so deplorable? what
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 24 2016 09: 33
        +2
        Quote: Dryuya2
        not really and really everything is so deplorable

        Hard to learn - easy in battle. Trite, but ...
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 April 24 2016 10: 48
        +1
        I didn’t understand what kind of jokes it was, running around with shit in my hands.
    2. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 24 2016 10: 06
      0
      Quote: demiurg
      The teutons were crushed.

      They kind of like a woman now steers ..... Maybe the power in female charms? Some kind of witch over evil spirits laughing
  3. Masya masya
    Masya masya April 24 2016 08: 34
    +4
    Well, they will post it ... Will there be anything left by itself? How will they be protected from the Russian "threat"?
  4. Lukich
    Lukich April 24 2016 08: 36
    +1
    As previously reported, the question of a new alliance mission aimed at strengthening the protection of Eastern European countries from the “Russian threat”

    verily, no one will frighten himself more than himself. it’s no longer a sickly worn-out record ourselves.
  5. yuriy55
    yuriy55 April 24 2016 08: 46
    +2
    Washington expects Germany to increase military presence in eastern NATO


    Is that all? Are you getting ready for the new June 22nd? fool

    And on the hill ... angry
    1. Tanya
      Tanya April 24 2016 09: 09
      +5
      [/ Quote]

      Is that all? Are you getting ready for the new June 22nd? fool

      And on the hill ... angry[/ Quote]
      Americans are preparing, but ordinary Germans are in doubt ... Here is a typical opinion from the German forum: "Die Falken in den USA wollen wohl unbedingt einen Krieg in Europa. Sie sitzen dann wiet weg in ihren Sessel und schauen SNN und essen Chips wenn heir die Bomben fallen "- The US Hawks undoubtedly want a war in Europe. They will then sit in their chairs far from here and will eat chips and watch on SNN as bombs fall here. request
  6. old pioneer
    old pioneer April 24 2016 08: 47
    +2
    the Americans felt that the German forces should be moved away so that they would not interfere with the German migrants
  7. krops777
    krops777 April 24 2016 09: 02
    +1
    And their discipline is lame. I don’t think that this bunch of overloaded donkeys can fight effectively. Whether our business.
  8. forester
    forester April 24 2016 09: 13
    +1
    There is a wounded pride of the macaque - he became nervous after visits to Cuba and the SA where he wasn’t met by bananas, and he twitched and started bending his sixes with orders and requirements. Putin also scored him like that)))))
  9. sub307
    sub307 April 24 2016 09: 15
    +2
    For the Germans, before "moving to the East", it is good to remember some "lessons of history". And then one gets the impression that they suffer from masochism (Masochism is a tendency to have pleasure, experiencing humiliation, violence or torment), then they adore "trendyuli" ea "East" to rake.
    1. Kos_kalinki9
      Kos_kalinki9 April 24 2016 09: 42
      +7
      So the story develops in a spiral.
      1. Roman 11
        Roman 11 April 24 2016 10: 40
        +1
        Quote: Kos_kalinki9
        We wait

        Why not see it? The financial scribe is getting close to Uncle Sam, not all vassals are already responding to orders, maybe they won’t even have time to start a war drinks
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 April 24 2016 11: 16
      +3
      Quote: sub307
      For the Germans, before "moving to the East", it is good to remember some "lessons of history".

      Quote: Tanya
      The Germans still remember many

      They remember, remember, not historically, so genetically ... Yes, they are not going anywhere, another thing is that they are pushed in the back, soon kicked, according to the principle "the main thing is not victory, but participation, but mandatory." The Germans themselves, at all levels, are panicky afraid to make any movements in an easterly direction - well, it’s on the fig ... And, in fact, apart from the Martians, there is no one to fight with (just do not talk about ISIS). Here and the Minister of Defense is just in the subject. And, by the way, an interesting moment: over the past two years we have heard enough about ourselves, loved ones from behind a hill of everyone and from everyone ... BUT !!! During this period, I don’t remember a single aggressive statement, not even the slightest hint of militant rhetoric from representatives of the Bundeswehr, military personnel ... Well brought up. They are, of course, military men; they will order, execute, but with motivation there will be complete disaster. Hence the "restrained reaction" to the call because of the puddle "Drang nah Osten!"
      1. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 April 24 2016 21: 45
        0
        Hence the "restrained reaction" to the call because of the puddle "Drang nah Osten!"

        They may have a drang, but for a different reason.
  10. Tanya
    Tanya April 24 2016 09: 31
    +2
    Quote: sub307
    For the Germans, before "moving to the East", it is good to remember some "lessons of history". And then one gets the impression that they suffer from masochism (Masochism is a tendency to have pleasure, experiencing humiliation, violence or torment), then they adore "trendyuli" ea "East" to rake.


    The Germans still remember many, therefore the vanguard is being prepared from Poles, Balts, Ukrainians, Turks and "various other Swedes". Well, in the East - the Japanese, to complete the "composition". It will be hard for us, if that ...
  11. Roman 11
    Roman 11 April 24 2016 09: 43
    0
    Washington demanded that Germany and Britain deploy troops and equipment on the eastern flank of the alliance - in the Baltic countries, Poland and Romania This proposal is enough to know the truth of the Yankees policy towards Russia of the 20th, 21st centuries - all according to the plan, by stages ..... 1917, 1991 to gradually reduce our territory.
    Fritz and Angles they are so lazy, they don’t really want to settle in the Baltic states, they have already fought with Russia laughing But they have no choice but to bow to fulfill the will of the owner, such is the fate of the lackeys.
    The Yankees themselves are cool behaving, slipping their servants, and themselves are shaking behind their backs ........ It seems if we respond to Chukotka and Kamchatka with marines, airborne forces, guards tank and motorized infantry units threatening Alaska, and even China will help - for example, throw some of its divisions, the Yanoks will give up ..... Alaska is a good springboard for living in North America laughing
    Otherwise, what, in vain do we conduct exercises beyond the Arctic Circle?
  12. atamankko
    atamankko April 24 2016 09: 45
    0
    Frau, you order, follow.
  13. CORNET
    CORNET April 24 2016 09: 52
    +2
    The Anglo-Saxons, as always behind their backs, are again helping Germans to war against Russia, but I hope Germany remembered Russian Ivan for a long time ... We can repeat the lesson! But it’s hard to deal with Washington all the same (the arrogant Saxons just won’t calm down) ... We are still weak, but give time for everything we ask!
  14. Roman 11
    Roman 11 April 24 2016 10: 00
    0
    Now, when the West has completely openly made a "stake", in Syria only a victory is needed, unconditional, Assad! Maybe the extra ones from the NATO convoy will have time to jump out - the Netherlands, Denmark, the Finns, someone else ..... It looks like demons from the west completely overlaid Russia. We need to think about the East, about the Bering Strait!
  15. Roman 11
    Roman 11 April 24 2016 10: 17
    0
    Fritz has been generally mysterious lately - the Chancellor is a woman, the Minister of Defense is a woman, it turns out the key places are women ...... where did the men go? It remains to plant Clinton in America and in NATO some bearded conchita laughing By the way here, too, often began to appear .......
  16. pvv113
    pvv113 April 24 2016 10: 25
    +3
    Washington demanded from Germany and Britain

    Europe has long lost its independence and became a US colony in which the Yankees feel like masters
  17. neo1200
    neo1200 April 24 2016 10: 50
    0
    The US then expects the deployment of troops of Germany and the UK in the Baltic countries. But do these countries have sufficient human and technical resources to accommodate them. If we are talking about a couple of battalions and a dozen tornado planes, then chickens are laughing. Syria has shown that our weapons are in fact no worse than the western ones. The West has recently created weapons to fight partisans, not a serious army.
  18. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 24 2016 10: 52
    0
    God sees, we did not want this. But since the NATO is asking, we’ll satisfy the request, then don’t complain.
  19. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 24 2016 11: 17
    0
    Washington demanded from Germany and Britain deployment of troops and equipment on the eastern flank of the alliance

    Personally, I saw a keyword - demanded. We would be outraged, and they (the main countries of Europe) take it for granted. That is our difference in passing Christian values.
  20. Fantazer911
    Fantazer911 April 24 2016 12: 07
    +1
    The states are most likely to prepare for war with Russia under the guise of a Russian threat. They are expanding their groupings in the Baltic states of Romania, Poland, and Ukraine. Turks, so I think we are on the verge of a grand military schucher, so now we need to be prepared for anything else than the devil’s joking, we on the forum, we mean that the States want to launder money at the expense of others and we know how to do it, but under that they can attack us and deliver another provocation and war.
    1. Ros 56
      Ros 56 April 24 2016 12: 16
      0
      In my opinion, all sane people understood this for a long time, we still have a little time. Almost like before the Second World War, well, maybe a little more.
  21. givigor71
    givigor71 April 24 2016 12: 45
    +2
    History will put everything in its place ....
  22. Olegater
    Olegater April 24 2016 16: 57
    +1
    “The United States primarily expects from Great Britain and Germany the deployment of troops and military equipment in the Baltic countries, Poland and Romania,” the magazine writes. According to the sources of the publication, “Barack Obama intends to address this issue at the mini-summit of the leaders of the USA, Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy scheduled for April 25 in Hanover”... So the instigators of the third world were identified. The rest (the Baltic countries, Poland and Romania), like a jackal, are pulled up in the form of bargaining chips and provocateurs. But in addition to the military issue, the signing of the TIIP will apparently be discussed. In June, a NATO meeting will take place. It will probably discuss the next plan for "Barbaros 2.0".
  23. koshmarik
    koshmarik April 24 2016 17: 44
    +2
    Europeans have one more value that they try not to advertise: lying under someone. In the 40s of the last century, Europe fell under Hitler, after the war, part of Europe fell under the USA, another part under the USSR, after the collapse of the USSR, all countries of Western Europe fell under the USA, now lovers lie in soft Europe, and Erdogan was added especially to Merkel. Actually, someone like that.
  24. Egen
    Egen April 25 2016 07: 21
    0
    Quote: Kos_kalinki9
    They may have a drang, but for a different reason.

    Also, there is such infa, from many classmates-Germans who faded in 90 to their historical homeland. Bullied, de there, we are Europe, and now they are finding contacts to return.

    On the whole, the Germans would have to figure out what is inside the police there — the army will be few, and for some reason they will be driven out ...