Military Review

2 ordered the next floating pier for "Boreev" in Vilyuchinsk

25
JSC "Central Design Bureau of Marine Engineering" Rubin "" on the website of public procurement posted information on the acquisition of the "Eastern shipyard" "engineering support for the object 628-1 - two heavy floating metal berths of the project 1516-CH (15163) with 205 serial numbers and 206, and a collapsible-removable bridge to them ", the blog reports bmpd.


2 ordered the next floating pier for "Boreev" in Vilyuchinsk
Arrival in Vilyuchinsk (Kamchatka) of the first nuclear-powered submarine cruiser of the strategic purpose project 955 K-550 "Alexander Nevsky" intended for basing there. Xnumx

According to the information, “the delivery must be made to the military unit 62695 in Vilyuchinsk (Kamchatka region) with the dates - the first floating berth for October 30 2017 of the year, the second floating berth and collapsible-removable bridge - to October 30 of the year 2018”.

The maximum price of products amounted to 2,48 billion rubles. The contract between the parties was signed in December 2015.

“These engineering facilities are intended for the 628 object - the new nuclear submarine cruiser of the strategic purpose series of the 955 project (Borey cipher) under construction in Vilyuchinsk. The construction of the 628 facility is carried out by the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Main Directorate of Special Construction in the Far Eastern Federal District under the Federal Agency for Special Construction", the blogger explains.

To date, the Navy has received a total of 4 berth project 15163.

Reference bmpd: “The heavy floating metal berth of the 15163 project consists of four metal pontoons with a length of 50 m. The length of the berth assembly (without a dismountable bridge) is about 205 m; berth width 14 m; berth height 2,7 m; the length of the dismountable bridge is 23,7 m. "

Two pontoons of the heavy floating metal berth of the 15163 project (building number 1402), built for the Russian Navy at Ship Repair and Shipbuilding Corporation in Gorodets (Nizhny Novgorod Region), are transported via the Volga-Baltic Canal to the Northern Fleet. Vytegra, 25.06.2015

Installation scheme of the heavy floating metal pier of the 15163 project in Vilyuchinsk
Photos used:
Spetsstroy of Russia, Pavel Feklistov / fleetphoto.ru
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NAV-STAR
    NAV-STAR April 22 2016 13: 06
    +4
    Beauty is mighty. National Security requires investment and new projects.
    1. Gerfalcon
      Gerfalcon April 22 2016 13: 13
      +6
      An interesting solution for nuclear-powered submarines, in fact, a pre-fabricated structure that can be deployed in any place convenient for the military.
      1. ava09
        ava09 April 22 2016 14: 32
        +3
        Quote: Gerfalcon
        An interesting solution for nuclear-powered submarines, in fact, a pre-fabricated structure that can be deployed in any place convenient for the military.

        Not everything is so simple, "in any convenient place for the military," apart from these pontoons, a complex infrastructure for basing and supporting nuclear submarines must be deployed. This is a city in miniature, maybe not in miniature ...-)
    2. zloybond
      zloybond April 22 2016 15: 01
      +3
      not beauty but idiocy is powerful ... some kind of nonsense ... in the state procurement system to paint TTXs that are generally closed to prying eyes ..... and advertise to the whole world what we buy for the army and navy .... idiots for the wall.
      1. Winnie76
        Winnie76 April 25 2016 08: 47
        0
        Oh my god, everything was lost, everyone learned about the secret pontoon. Zloybond, the position of the head of the first department of VO is suitable for you. Shoot us all wink
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock April 22 2016 13: 16
    +6
    The question is a little off topic. But I do not want to wait for a suitable topic to ask it.
    Recently there was news about the development of the fifth generation submarine "Husky". It said that the 5th generation submarines would be unified with each other, that is, SSBNs from a multipurpose submarine would differ only by an additional insert into the hull of mines with intercontinental missiles.
    There was also other news that they would again build a separate anti-aircraft variant (a new version of Antei) and separately small torpedo submarines to combat enemy submarines (something like Lyra will be). Well, respectively, also a new SSBN.
    What information is true?
    1. tchack
      tchack April 22 2016 13: 37
      +3
      Good try, CIA ... laughing
      1. Rash
        Rash April 22 2016 13: 52
        +3
        The CIA has nothing to do with it, the comrade asks on the merits.
        1. NordUral
          NordUral April 22 2016 16: 57
          -1
          There is a good obscene answer to this question. This one: pi ..... ly (hollow breeds - a synonym).
      2. NordUral
        NordUral April 22 2016 16: 59
        0
        The CIA with such "our" government and without VO knows everything and more than this government.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas April 22 2016 14: 03
      +1
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      What information is true?

      All, for still with a pitchfork on the water.
    3. mav1971
      mav1971 April 22 2016 14: 25
      +7
      Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
      The question is a little off topic. But I do not want to wait for a suitable topic to ask it.
      Recently there was news about the development of the fifth generation submarine "Husky". It said that the 5th generation submarines would be unified with each other, that is, SSBNs from a multipurpose submarine would differ only by an additional insert into the hull of mines with intercontinental missiles.
      There was also other news that they would again build a separate anti-aircraft variant (a new version of Antei) and separately small torpedo submarines to combat enemy submarines (something like Lyra will be). Well, respectively, also a new SSBN.
      What information is true?



      The second is more true than the new Antei.
      Forecasts are that:
      1. in SSBN monsters on 20-24 missiles will no longer do.
      As SLBM carriers, there is a high probability of reducing the number of mines to the level of 10-12 launchers.
      And a corresponding reduction in displacement.

      2. Premier League - also reduce displacement to the level of the French Barracuda, and most likely and even further - to Rubis, Soryu, i.e. 3-5 thousand tons.


      By the very concept.
      Composites and composites. In everything.
      Those. very little steel and a lot of different non-metals.

      External placement of weapons. Those. torpedo tubes integrated into the hull of the boat will not.
      Full electric movement.
      Crew in 50-60 people.

      The real 5 generation we will see only in 2030-2040.
      All other bravado - from the evil one.
      Simply because of the lack of the necessary composites.

      Steel submarines are not the fifth generation.
      She will be 4 with the number of advantages that marketers hang on her from defense.
      But not the fifth.
      For the concept of composites means the complete noiselessness of the boat and the hull as a whole.
      Real damping of all internal vibrations and noise.
      Real attenuation of external pulses.
      The controlled structure of composites, variable density and strength, the shape of frame structures and aggregates - all this makes the boat silent.
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 22 2016 17: 34
        0
        Quote: mav1971
        The second is more true than the new Antei.
        Forecasts are that:
        1. in SSBN monsters on 20-24 missiles will no longer do.
        As SLBM carriers, there is a high probability of reducing the number of mines to the level of 10-12 launchers.
        And a corresponding reduction in displacement.

        2. Premier League - also reduce displacement to the level of the French Barracuda, and most likely and even further - to Rubis, Soryu, i.e. 3-5 thousand tons.


        By the very concept.
        Composites and composites. In everything.
        Those. very little steel and a lot of different non-metals.

        External placement of weapons. Those. torpedo tubes integrated into the hull of the boat will not.
        Full electric movement.
        Crew in 50-60 people.

        The real 5 generation we will see only in 2030-2040.
        All other bravado - from the evil one.
        Simply because of the lack of the necessary composites.

        Steel submarines are not the fifth generation.
        She will be 4 with the number of advantages that marketers hang on her from defense.
        But not the fifth.
        For the concept of composites means the complete noiselessness of the boat and the hull as a whole.
        Real damping of all internal vibrations and noise.
        Real attenuation of external pulses.
        The controlled structure of composites, variable density and strength, the shape of frame structures and aggregates - all this makes the boat silent.

        With atomic, let's understand. And what about the 5th generation non-nuclear submarines? Almost in 2020, they promise to lay Kalina at the shipyard. The 5th generation non-nuclear submarine has the same requirements as the atomic submarine? It is clear that our designers will finally bring to mind the non-volatile installation, but as for the composite hull and the external missile and torpedo placement system in single-shot launchers, will this also be implemented on non-nuclear submarines? Following your words in composites, we have not yet reached that level to build submarines from them, so how are they going to build Kalina? Or will it be the same fret only with VNEU?
    4. Verdun
      Verdun April 22 2016 15: 28
      +1
      What information is true? Lt. air force stock
      Too different technical requirements for missile submarines and hunting boats. It's all the same that from the same modules to collect "Ferrari" and "Fiat-500".
    5. Dart2027
      Dart2027 April 22 2016 20: 27
      0
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      What information is true?

      We just started talking until at least there is no technical project that is known.
  3. 75 hammer
    75 hammer April 22 2016 13: 42
    +2
    And two more floating pontoons №206, 206 will be able to carry on board the missile mega hyper duper sonic Zircon missiles -2016 units with a flight range of 10416 km. - Especially for the CIA! The enemy does not sleep, but the chatterbox is a godsend for a spy !!!
  4. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 22 2016 14: 00
    0
    From Kamchatka to the United States at hand ...
  5. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 22 2016 14: 22
    0
    I have never known in life that there are floating moorings, well, we have moorings in the steppe, and when I visited the sea, it was somehow not up to the moorings.
    1. mav1971
      mav1971 April 22 2016 14: 27
      0
      Quote: Ros 56
      I have never known in life that there are floating moorings, well, we have moorings in the steppe, and when I visited the sea, it was somehow not up to the moorings.


      Those. do you know about conventional landing stages?
  6. MuadDib
    MuadDib April 22 2016 15: 29
    -1
    It's great. But! What about the salaries of workers who were worth the previous berths. The latest news on this topic was April 12th. And then there was nothing good. Debt to the workers at SU 707 remained.
  7. Verdun
    Verdun April 22 2016 15: 29
    0
    It is not clear why only for Boreyev? Can't other boats be moored to such a structure?
  8. victorrychkov
    victorrychkov April 22 2016 16: 34
    0
    The question is certainly interesting, but why it was impossible to use the existing 13 (thirteen)! floating piers to which 667 BRDM were successfully moored to two units, both from the east and from the west. But on displacement and draft there is not much difference.
  9. filalex79
    filalex79 April 22 2016 18: 14
    -1
    The maximum price of products amounted to 2,48 billion rubles. 2,48 billion rubles for 2 floating moorings - a good budget cut!
  10. Sergey333
    Sergey333 April 22 2016 20: 05
    +2
    Interesting infa, did not know that nuclear submarines are moored to floating moorings. And if you look like this, put them together a little - and the aircraft carrier is ready.
  11. Concealer
    Concealer April 22 2016 21: 08
    -1
    The maximum price of products amounted to 2,48 billion rubles. The contract between the parties was signed in December 2015.

    Are they made of gold?