Military Review

The United States again expressed "dissatisfaction" with the actions of Russian military aviation over the Baltic Sea

117
Once again, the US military has expressed “concern” about the activity of the Russian aviation over the Baltic Sea. Concern is expressed by the state, which is several thousand kilometers from the Baltic Sea, and whose warships cruise only a few tens of kilometers from the borders of the Russian Federation.


The United States again expressed "dissatisfaction" with the actions of Russian military aviation over the Baltic Sea


Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis reiterated the US position on the "inadmissibility of the actions of Russian aviation." The talk was about the flights of Russian Su-24 aircraft in close proximity to the American destroyer Donald Cook, as well as about intercepting the American reconnaissance aircraft RC-135.

RIA News cites Davis's statement:
We are not at war with Russia, we have no reason to think that they will attack our ships. However, the commander (of the ship), who has the right to self-defense, must decide quickly. We do not want him to make a mistake in the calculations, based on their inappropriate behavior.


Recall that earlier claims to Russia were expressed by the head of the American foreign affairs agency, John Kerry. He sent a note of protest to his colleague Sergey Lavrov. Apparently, Kerry and all other representatives of the US government finally believed that their warships and airplanes could feel at home anywhere in the world. Otherwise, how can such a hysteria be explained to those who effectively clicked on the nose.
Photos used:
novosti-dny.ru
117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii April 22 2016 07: 05
    +23
    I don’t really want to drown a little far from home. It is not known where and why.
    1. Voha_krim
      Voha_krim April 22 2016 07: 14
      +47
      Quote: Teberii
      I don’t really want to drown a little far from home. It is not known where and why.

      If the Americans dared to show aggression against our plane, then the life time of their entire group present at the exercises in the Baltic Sea would be 5-10 minutes. Two years ago, after the first fright of Donald Cook, a senior officer of the Russian Navy spoke about this. The Americans knew this very well, and therefore did not begin to twitch.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana April 22 2016 07: 40
        +14
        It’s just that Americans are unhappy with such a possible exchange of “courtesies” between the USA and the Russian Federation in the Black Sea, since their “Donald Cook” is, apparently, much more expensive than our SU-24. The United States benefits in war in 1st place. In this regard, they are very sensitive rationalists.
        And they don’t care about the fact that they are on foreign borders - it’s they, and not someone else, who are establishing their own “new world order” in the world, according to which, in their understanding, the whole world belongs exclusively to Americans and that’s all, what belongs to other peoples in other countries - these, in the opinion of the Americans, "under-peoples" - belongs only TEMPORARILY!
        1. Kostyar
          Kostyar April 22 2016 08: 53
          +5
          Concern is expressed by the state, which is several thousand kilometers from the Baltic Sea, and whose warships cruise only a few tens of kilometers from the borders of the Russian Federation.

          And it’s not just cruising, but a missile strike cruiser fulfills attacks on infrastructure and cities for millionaires ......
          1. _Vladislav_
            _Vladislav_ April 22 2016 09: 26
            +3
            Do not be surprised by such a statement from the American "friends". Actually, pay attention to the words of this statement and everything will become clear to you:
            ...... we have no reason to think
        2. kotvov
          kotvov April 22 2016 11: 32
          +3
          "Nonsense" - belongs only temporarily! ,,
          very reminiscent of the world order of one gypsy tribe. they also believe that everything belongs to them, only temporarily transferred to other peoples. fellow
      2. bronik
        bronik April 22 2016 07: 54
        +36
        To NATO’s demand to punish the Russian pilot Su-24, which frightened the sailors of their destroyer in the Baltic Sea, Lavrov replies: “As a result of the investigation, the guilty one, Captain Sidorchuk, was identified. Major Sidorchuk was reprimanded for this. If Major Sidorchuk once again throws something like that, then we will announce the most severe reprimand to Colonel Sidorchuk ...
        1. Diana Ilyina
          Diana Ilyina April 22 2016 09: 58
          +21
          Quote: bronik
          To NATO’s demand to punish the Russian pilot Su-24, which frightened the sailors of their destroyer in the Baltic Sea, Lavrov replies: “As a result of the investigation, the guilty one, Captain Sidorchuk, was identified. Major Sidorchuk was reprimanded for this. If Major Sidorchuk once again throws something like that, then we will announce the most severe reprimand to Colonel Sidorchuk ...


          There was one such case in our history. It was in the 19th century under Alexander III. On the border with Afghanistan, our Cossack patrol caught an English spy who was trying to infiltrate Russian territory. Cossack esaul to the impudent statement of the Englishman that he was a subject of the British crown, and therefore he should be handed over to the British embassy with honors, he took and without any particular obnoxious orders ordered the Englishman to be torn out and thrown out of the territory of Russia. To this, the British Foreign Ministry submitted a note of protest demanding to punish Yesaul for inappropriate treatment of the British subject. Alexander III, after reading the note, wrote to Yesaul a short note: Congratulations to the colonel, if they had hung, would have been a general! This is about the same series.
    2. HERMES
      HERMES April 22 2016 07: 14
      +3
      US military again expresses “concern”


      Colleagues from the State Department seem to have infected them with "concern" ... they will soon have a nervous breakdown there with the whole country ...
    3. vkl.47
      vkl.47 April 22 2016 07: 22
      +2
      first, cut down the BEB. and then cover it with the BAL.
      1. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 April 22 2016 07: 25
        +7
        In the United States again expressed "dissatisfaction"

        And when did they rejoice for us? Probably in the dashing 90s, when Boris ruled.
        1. Thrall
          Thrall April 22 2016 07: 29
          +2
          Let the sun spot care. Well, sanctions will introduce another one on this occasion. This is Putin's fault laughing
    4. forester
      forester April 22 2016 08: 06
      +10
      I remembered the anecdote: after flying a Russian plane, Kerry Lavrov replied to the note: - the SU-24 pilot was given a warning to captain Petrov in the next case, if such actions were repeated, Major Petrov would be reprimanded if Colonel Petrov continued hooligan actions he would be reprimanded and he would be punished 10-day vacation)))
    5. Blondy
      Blondy April 22 2016 08: 23
      +7
      Safety precautions must be observed - do not sail where planes fly - and do not rely on mantras such as: "Take the planes away, I will sail here." Then there will be fewer reasons for dissatisfaction and the risk of drowning.
      1. Error
        Error April 22 2016 08: 47
        +1
        B ... I now they are whiners just yelling like grandmas in the market
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock April 22 2016 08: 58
          +1
          It is necessary to place several complexes of Bastion there in order to completely block the Baltic Sea. And faster to build new submarines "Lada" for the Baltic Fleet, it seems to me that the United States is going to build anti-submarine UAV ships primarily for the Baltic, Mediterranean, Black and South China.
          Several of these ships in the Baltic Sea may well spoil the life of submariners, which is why it is important to build the best that we have at the moment.
      2. PSih2097
        PSih2097 April 22 2016 08: 55
        +5
        Interestingly, they expressed concern about the Su-24, then what will they say about the flight of a couple of these?
    6. YARUSSIAN39
      YARUSSIAN39 April 22 2016 18: 16
      +1
      That’s for sure, and we always run into it ourselves, and then they are surprised, we don’t drive ships with missile weapons to their shores at a distance of 70 km from their naval bases, so a swarm of fighters would fly over our ships there
  2. avvg
    avvg April 22 2016 07: 06
    +9
    Once again 101 times, the Americans "expressed" their dissatisfaction with the actions of the Russian military aviation over the Baltic Sea, which fly around their borders and frighten the "Innocent NATO members".
    1. Amurets
      Amurets April 22 2016 07: 26
      +5
      Quote: avvg
      Once again, the Americans "expressed" dissatisfaction,

      Don't like it? You don't have to go where you are not asked. Suddenly the Swedes will start a panic attack and they are frightened, suddenly this is another Russian nuclear submarine "Dmitry Donskoy", open fire to kill. on the target. Dill did it well.
    2. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak April 22 2016 10: 30
      +5
      Quote: avvg
      , Americans "expressed" dissatisfaction

      I came to the borders of Russia to show my flag, do not be offended that the Russian flag was shown to you.
      It would be nice if the Americans would more often show our flag somewhere closer to their borders. A similar demonstration of the flag of Russia in the Persian Gulf, will lower the Americans below the baseboard. According to their rules, they will have to leave at least 800 miles from this place.
  3. wasjasibirjac
    wasjasibirjac April 22 2016 07: 08
    +8
    maybe between the Russian "Sushka" and the American "D. Cook" some kind of cordial relationship arose? there is how a guy runs bravo to visit.
    1. inkass_98
      inkass_98 April 22 2016 07: 16
      +12
      No, then different guys are running around laughing , it’s just that the girl turned out to be walking, wandering back and forth across the oceans, looking for adventures in different places lol .
    2. HERMES
      HERMES April 22 2016 07: 18
      -2
      Quote: wasjasibirjac
      between the Russian "Sushka" and the American "D. Cook" some kind of cordial relationship


      Then I look at the "D. Cook" pipe somehow wide ...
  4. KOH
    KOH April 22 2016 07: 08
    +6
    Let them express their discontent there, the main thing is that we are very satisfied ... smileGet out of the Baltic, are you lost? ...
    1. tol100v
      tol100v April 22 2016 07: 25
      +2
      Quote: CON
      Let them express their discontent there, the main thing is that we are very satisfied ...

      Quote: CON
      Otherwise, what could explain such a hysteria to those who were effectively clicked on the nose.

      SGA begged to click between the legs!
  5. tchoni
    tchoni April 22 2016 07: 10
    -24%
    That's exactly why the Russian government had an excellent reason to think about improving the living standards of its citizens ...
    1. KOH
      KOH April 22 2016 07: 25
      +7
      Are you apparently lost too? ...
      1. tchoni
        tchoni April 22 2016 08: 07
        -7
        Do you think that the standard of living in Russia is high? and doesn’t fall ?, while giving firewood for any left-right-liberal-relevant opposition?
        Marx also said: poverty is fuel for revolutions.
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov April 22 2016 07: 36
      +7
      Quote: tchoni
      That's exactly why the Russian government had an excellent reason to think about improving the living standards of its citizens ...

      You accidentally did not go with the destroyer Donald Cook?
      1. tchoni
        tchoni April 22 2016 08: 15
        -14%
        You see, destroyer diphile, it's not just that. And the screams in response to, in general, an ordinary flight, the same is not casual. This is a kind of litmus test designed to reveal the reaction not even of Russia, but rather of Europe: "Are they still afraid of the Russians?" and if not, then remind her of the Asian savagery: they say they are screaming, you bastards, it's a horrible idea. Fear good Europeans!
        And the only way for Russia to make peace with Europe, if you like, to bring it into the circle of Russia's natural allies, is to exceed the standard of living of the European population. So that we would not look to them with zest, but they to us. So that the Latvians and other independent Balts would ask for the "Russian occupation", and would not frighten her children.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets April 22 2016 08: 19
          +11
          Quote: tchoni
          You see, destroyer diphile, it's not just that. And the screams in response to, in general, an ordinary flight, the same is not casual. This is a kind of litmus test designed to reveal the reaction not even of Russia, but rather of Europe: "Are they still afraid of the Russians?" and if not, then remind her of the Asian savagery: they say they are screaming, you bastards, it's a horrible idea. Fear good Europeans!
          And the only way for Russia to make peace with Europe, if you like, to bring it into the circle of Russia's natural allies, is to exceed the standard of living of the European population. So that we would not look to them with zest, but they to us. So that the Latvians and other independent Balts would ask for the "Russian occupation", and would not frighten her children.

          "Gosh, with such an analytical mindset you need to work in the Forecast Bureau" (c) wink
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov April 22 2016 08: 32
            +3
            Quote: Vladimirets
            "Gosh, with such an analytical mindset you need to work in the Forecast Bureau" (c)

            God forbid lol
          2. tchoni
            tchoni April 22 2016 09: 05
            -7
            Those. You do not want the Russian people to live better than Europeans? wassat
            Who then is from Donald Cook? hi
            1. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets April 22 2016 09: 28
              +5
              Quote: tchoni
              You do not want the Russian people to live better than Europeans?

              I also want there to be world peace, no one was sick and everyone was happy. yes
              It’s just that your path turned out to be some kind of ornate. With a maximum of costs and a minimum of results. I have a counter question:
              Quote: tchoni
              What would the Latvians and other independent Balts ask for a "Russian occupation"

              Do we need it? To bring all this happiness back? No.
              1. tchoni
                tchoni April 22 2016 10: 38
                -2
                I didn’t return, but I would very much like to return.
                I wanted to be our neighbor, not their ally.
                The strength of the States is not in aircraft carriers and ballistic missiles ... more precisely, not only in them. Their strength is in a large number of satellites who dance to their tune for a song, of which they are money, brains ...
                And all this is not without the help of a high standard of living in AI itself ...
                And as for the costs, then the costs of improving the living standards of one’s own people can be justified unjustifiably, and the result (a good life in their native country) is miserable? - No, you're definitely from Donald Cook.
                1. Vladimirets
                  Vladimirets April 22 2016 11: 02
                  +3
                  Quote: tchoni
                  You are definitely with Donald Cook.

                  Let's see who is from where.
                  Quote: tchoni
                  exceed the standard of living of the European population. So that we would not look to them with zest, but they to us. So that the Latvians and other independent Balts would ask for the "Russian occupation", and would not frighten her children.

                  You write that we need to raise the standard of living so that they envy us and ask us to "occupy", that is, life was not good for us, but the Latvians were jealous. And after that, you're still lying, twisting:
                  Quote: tchoni
                  then the costs of improving the standard of living of their own people to accuse unjustified, and the result (a good life in their home country) is miserable?

                  You set the goal - the envy of Europe, I said that this result, if achieved, is miserable, given the enormous cost of achieving it. Understandably?
                  Quote: tchoni
                  The strength of the States is not in aircraft carriers and ballistic missiles ... more precisely, not only in them. Their strength is in a large number of satellites who dance to their tune for a song, of which they are money, brains ...

                  You are confusing causes and effects. Where did their satellites come from? What, everyone loves jazz, hamburgers and cowboys? Satellites depend on the United States, mainly economically, the ties of the entire economy to the dollar. Who climbs out from under the hood, the one on the cumpole, this is what the army needs.
                  1. tchoni
                    tchoni April 22 2016 13: 55
                    -2
                    Quote: Vladimirets
                    Let's see who is from where.

                    And let's.
                    .e. We didn’t live well, but Latvians are jealous. And after that, still lying, juggling:
                    Here do not distort, please. I said exactly what I said: WE NEED TO LIVE WELL. so good that citizens of the Russian Federation would be so desirable for citizens of other countries that they would be ready to move, learn a language, live for many years as non-citizens in order to receive it. What and where did I distort? If anyone jerks, it's you.
                    Quote: Vladimirets
                    You set a goal - the envy of Europe, I said that this result, if achieved, is miserable, given the enormous cost of achieving it

                    Not understood. The envy of Europe is just one of the goals. Raising the living standards of the population is the goal of ANY state. If upon reaching it we regress a couple of passing tasks (a couple of dozens ... hehe ... from brain drain to lowering the degree of social tension, enumeration can take a long time) - this is excellent.
                    And what PRICE are you talking about? Payments to the studio!
                    Quote: Vladimirets
                    Satellites depend on the United States, mainly economically, the ties of the entire economy to the dollar. Who climbs out from under the hood, the one on the cumpole, this is what the army needs.

                    Here, you are like Pavlov’s dog, you understand everything, and even sometimes speak the right way. Just HOW TO BUILD A BLUE ECONOMY WITH POOR CITIZENS? Please explain to me ...
                    1. Sagittarius YaNAO
                      Sagittarius YaNAO April 22 2016 21: 01
                      +1
                      Quote: tchoni
                      WE NEED TO LIVE WELL. so good that citizens of the Russian Federation would be so desirable for citizens of other countries that they would be ready to move, learn a language, live for many years as non-citizens in order to receive it.

                      You that the example of Europe is not enough, you are a masochist however.
              2. Ezhaak
                Ezhaak April 22 2016 10: 49
                +2
                Quote: Vladimirets
                With a maximum of costs and a minimum of results.

                But, pay attention to the first phrase:
                Quote: tchoni
                ... the Russian government had an excellent reason to think about improving the living standards of its citizens ...
                No more and no less. But the citizen has no idea that the European warriors trying to resist the military expansion of Russia have recently lacked weapons and ammunition. Example: Dutch warriors scamper about the landfills with yells: Puff-puff, I shot you!
                1. tchoni
                  tchoni April 22 2016 13: 59
                  -4
                  Quote: Hedgehog
                  Lately, warriors trying to counter Russia's military expansion have sorely lacked weapons and ammunition. Example: Dutch warriors scamper about the landfills with yells: Puff-puff, I shot you!

                  In our army, we have the same classes "on foot on such", "on foot on flight" If we really fall into the lyrics, Herr Gudyrian started the same with paper models of tanks ...
                  The main thing why this is said is incomprehensible ...
                  1. Ezhaak
                    Ezhaak April 22 2016 14: 35
                    +3
                    Quote: tchoni
                    The main thing why this is said is incomprehensible ...

                    You need to follow the news. Then everything will be completely UNDERSTANDING.
                    Information almost a year ago, about which some have no idea. http://politrussia.com/news/oralnye-strelby-461/
                    1. tchoni
                      tchoni April 22 2016 15: 00
                      -2
                      Still not clear. Explain clearly .... hi
                      1. Ezhaak
                        Ezhaak April 22 2016 17: 24
                        +1
                        Quote: tchoni
                        Still not clear.

                        Oh, well, if it’s not clear in black and white, what can I explain? It seems to be useless. Relax, stock captain. By chance, do not have a nickname relative? He also eats in the head.
                      2. tchoni
                        tchoni April 22 2016 17: 40
                        -3
                        It looks like you’re a nickname relative ... Once you can’t write two words on the topic, you can clearly explain your position not in distinction.
                      3. Ezhaak
                        Ezhaak April 22 2016 19: 14
                        +3
                        Quote: tchoni
                        Just two words on the topic do not write can and clearly explain their position not in distance.

                        And again, the grammar is lame.
                        As I understand it, the captain of the reserve did not understand from the link, or could not open and read it, EUROPEISTS, DUTCHERS IN THE EXAMPLE, do not have money for weapons and ammunition, even for training, for exercises. And they also hope that the sons will fight for them. Is it really so hard for the stock captain to understand? Yes, with such officers any war will be lost. Your place, captain, in Europe!
                      4. tchoni
                        tchoni April 23 2016 05: 45
                        -1
                        But my esteemed descendant of Hedgehog and Cancer, as I understand it, they survived completely out of mind in Penzia, since they are not able to understand what you are being asked. And I ask you this: How are two things interconnected: the lack of ammunition in the army of one of the European states (we have the same fairly common occurrence as the absence of fuel and lubricants, as well as the lack of spare parts or motor resources) and the standard of living of a Russian citizen?
                        So, my friend, you, though a peZionEr, are not familiar with OTTechistic classics! Krylova, read, Krylova!
                      5. Ezhaak
                        Ezhaak April 23 2016 13: 46
                        +1
                        Quote: tchoni
                        How two things are interconnected:

                        Well, since the captain is not able to draw parallels, then there are no questions. Therefore, the captain. They do not take such astronauts. The reason is simple. Inability to read, and understand. Holland, as it turned out, is not the only such country.
    3. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak April 22 2016 10: 56
      +4
      Quote: tchoni
      Those. You do not want the Russian people to live better than Europeans?

      I want, but not in this way. The terms of resistance of European states of Nazi Germany: Poland - 27 days; Denmark - 6 hours; Netherlands - 4 days; Norway - 2 months 1 day; France - 1 month 12 days; Yugoslavia - 11 days; Greece - 24 days; USSR - 3 years 11 months 16 days. What ended 2WW I hope there is no need to explain.
      1. tchoni
        tchoni April 22 2016 14: 01
        -4
        I refer to the previous comment. The army that secured these terms began as a poor, semi-police organization with cardboard tanks. Only what is said here ... It is not clear. If you guys don’t want to live well, please, send me your salaries to my bank account.
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak April 22 2016 14: 39
          +5
          Quote: tchoni
          You can forward your salaries to my bank account.

          Uneducated work is poorly paid. Two quotes, two mistakes. And also deneh requires. Fihwam, Native American hut, in other words.
          1. tchoni
            tchoni April 22 2016 14: 58
            -4
            Quote: Hedgehog
            Uneducated work is poorly paid. Two quotes, two mistakes. And also deneh requires. Fihwam, Native American hut, in other words.

            Do you guys know what it's called? - scratch your tongue, not toss the little things.
            Shouting that we are altruists and we don’t need to do anything is very easy and pleasant .... (you recognize yourself as a patriot)
            But not everyone will be able to crash their car under the windows of the Metropol Hotel in protest. Because "the parts are all their own" ... /
            1. Ezhaak
              Ezhaak April 22 2016 17: 28
              +1
              Quote: tchoni
              - scratch your tongue, not toss the little things.
              Shout that we are altruists and we don’t need anything

              As far as I know, bags should be discussed. And in Russian, what does "little things" mean? The clever one will not fight near the Metropol, perfectly realizing the senselessness of this.
              1. tchoni
                tchoni April 23 2016 05: 47
                -2
                Quote: Hedgehog
                As far as I know, bags should be discussed. And in Russian, what does "little things" mean? The clever one will not fight near the Metropol, perfectly realizing the senselessness of this.

                So I’m saying ... Yelling all the more ... And refuse money - bad Nem!
              2. tchoni
                tchoni April 23 2016 05: 53
                0
                By the way, about mistakes ... Punctuation marks apply to them the same ...
  • Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky April 22 2016 11: 04
    +1
    And the only way for Russia to make peace with Europe, if you like, to bring it into the circle of Russia's natural allies, is to exceed the standard of living of the European population. So that we would not look to them with zest, but they to us. So that the Latvians and other independent Balts would ask for the "Russian occupation", and would not frighten her children.

    Killed! Tightly!
    It turns out that the mattresses expanding to the East, expanding their strike force, installing a missile defense system around the perimeter of Russia and chasing missile destroyers in the economic zone of the Russian Federation, simply find out whether Europeans are afraid of us and encourage Russians to prove to ordinary Europeans that they Good guys.
    You have American logic, i.e. lack of any logic.
    1. tchoni
      tchoni April 22 2016 13: 28
      -9
      He began to copy and paste the quotes, but then he realized that it was useless. So say: we are satisfied with Russia with poor, disenfranchised citizens, who are scared of the whole world. In which it is impossible to lure the scientist from the side except at the gunpoint, which lives in isolation ...
      Yes ...
      In general, guys, as I understand it, North Korea is your option. Not mine ...
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets April 22 2016 13: 36
        +1
        Quote: tchoni
        In general, guys, as I understand it, North Korea is your option. Not mine ...

        Our option is Russia, yours is western Europe, this is neither good nor bad, just to each his own. yes
        1. tchoni
          tchoni April 22 2016 15: 06
          -7
          those. you do not need a country whose citizens live in abundance?
          I can’t understand you guys ...
          Judging by the local words here that are negative to me, for the sake of the greatness of Russia, they are ready to work for workdays and doom their descendants to it. Do I understand correctly?
          Absolutely not caring about who and what has this greatness?
  • KOH
    KOH April 22 2016 10: 07
    0
    !!!!!!!!! laughing
  • gergi
    gergi April 22 2016 07: 14
    +2
    With some sort of manic persistence, the exceptional ones beg time and time again to be sent to x ..! Do they like it there, chtoli? What kind of masochism?
  • Angara
    Angara April 22 2016 07: 19
    +2
    And we did not call you to the Baltic. Either get out of here or endure wassat
  • Dax
    Dax April 22 2016 07: 22
    +4
    If ours is not in words, but in fact has self-esteem, then the answer should be appropriate. These asexual jackals (illiterate, uncultured and bloodthirsty) will stealthily attack and provoke until they get a clear confident answer.
  • Chak
    Chak April 22 2016 07: 25
    +19
    Stukuha is scamming, they are sending us Cook
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 22 2016 07: 26
    +9
    once again expressed “concern” about the activity of Russian aviation over the Baltic Sea

    It seems to me that the time has come for the group of our ships to pay a friendly visit to Cuba through the Gulf of Mexico or the Strait of Florida. And then express concern about the activity of American aviation.
  • 1536
    1536 April 22 2016 07: 26
    +1
    It's time to declare the American ship Cook a pirate ship! With all that it implies.
  • Neophyte
    Neophyte April 22 2016 07: 36
    0
    Russia has a lot of seas! Obviously, the next call to the Barents Sea? However, in the cold, pants can zadubite! Maybe enough to test the strength of the crew! By the way, for every such trip, it's time to award the Green Pampers medal!
  • Holsten
    Holsten April 22 2016 07: 38
    0
    It is directly necessary to express your concern and express it in the form of a randomly flown underwater mine from the times of the 1st World War. Then, by itself, express a friendly concern by asking: Doesn’t you squeeze anything here?
  • nivander
    nivander April 22 2016 07: 39
    +10
    By the way, when our planes and ships approach the foggy shores of Tan, all western tabloids explode from hysterical articles and comments
    1. Engineer
      Engineer April 22 2016 08: 38
      0
      it is better to change the inscription "Northwind" to "Ash" - Americans are really afraid of Ash for the combination of characteristics, but Boreas, collected because of the case of different boats and armed with a Pin, they are definitely not afraid with their Ohio from Trident II D5.
      1. ametist415
        ametist415 April 22 2016 10: 06
        -13%
        Watch the video, although it’s an advertisement, but there you can see the workshops and the level of technology at the shipyard, and then look at our factory. If 2-3 Americans enter the Barents Sea, figs you will catch them all SF together.
        1. sodick
          sodick April 22 2016 11: 16
          0
          In vain did they instruct the minuses, the level of Russian technologies really lags behind by 20 years, while the money allocated for the modernization of production is simply stolen (by the way, we also had such cases at the factory) or spent on equipment that no one needs, but is expensive and expensive get a rollback when buying, there is no clear program for the development of production.
    2. ametist415
      ametist415 April 22 2016 09: 52
      -9
      The US has very good submarines. If the commander of a Russian submarine is the same as you, then he will come to an end in the sea.
  • LÄRZ
    LÄRZ April 22 2016 07: 39
    +1
    Make a specific "present" with specific facts. What have we violated? Ours is the sea, ours. Like Black.
  • orphan 63
    orphan 63 April 22 2016 07: 46
    +5
    laughing On the demand of NATO to punish the Russian pilot Su-24, which frightened the sailors of the destroyer Cook in the Baltic Sea, the Russian Foreign Ministry said:
    As a result of an internal investigation, the culprit of the incident, Captain Ivanov, was identified. A penalty was imposed on the major. And if Major Ivanov again throws something like that, then Colonel Ivanov will be reprimanded.
  • Uncle lee
    Uncle lee April 22 2016 07: 48
    +5
    “Naval love” Vladimir Mayakovsky

    On the seas, playing, rushing
    with the destroyer.

    Clings, as if a honey sedge,
    the destroyer.

    And the end would not have happened to him,
    complacency minnosom.

    Suddenly, a spotlight, lifting glasses on his nose,
    stared at the back of the destroyer.

    How the coppery thunder roars:
    "Rrr-astakaya minonosin!"

    Right, left, right, rush right
    and the destroyer escaped.

    But he managed to hit
    along the rip along the minnose.

    Crying and howling by the seas rushes:
    widow destroyer.

    And why is it unbearable for us
    world in the minonosin family?
  • Zomanus
    Zomanus April 22 2016 07: 49
    -13%
    Well, in general, I agree with the Americans.
    They were in neutral waters.
    I will not say that you just had to watch, no.
    Just do it differently, without provocation.
    1. Shuttle
      Shuttle April 22 2016 10: 06
      +6
      Quote: Zomanus
      Well, in general, I agree with the Americans.
      They were in neutral waters.
      I will not say that you just had to watch, no.
      Just do it differently without provocation

      And what is the provocation? Flying too close? Oh, sorry. The training of our pilots, navigation and control tools allows such a distance and speed. But the Americans do not allow? Very sorry. But there is good news - there is something to work on and with whom to learn.

      You see the matter, dear sir. It must be done so that there is no more reason to do it. Then you don’t have to do that at all. This is both reasonable and humane, and beneficial in all respects.

      And what would you say about such exercises in 1969, for example?
    2. kotvov
      kotvov April 22 2016 11: 43
      +1
      Well, in general, I agree with the Americans. ,,
      so write a complaint to the General Staff, they will carefully explain to you that neutral waters are neutral, that EVERYONE can use them, without exception.
  • INF
    INF April 22 2016 07: 56
    +1
    In general, you need to make sure that you forget about the dream.
  • with
    with April 22 2016 07: 56
    +1
    Due to the fact that the Americans constantly express their dissatisfaction with the presence of the Russian Armed Forces and the Navy, I ask that this condition be considered normal for the American, and simply do not pay attention. It is abnormal to consider the condition when Americans will admire the actions of the Navy and the Russian Armed Forces.
  • sl22277
    sl22277 April 22 2016 08: 00
    +1
    We are also unhappy with American ships in the Baltic Sea. Nehru swim near our borders.
  • Baloo
    Baloo April 22 2016 08: 00
    +1
    Again, I expressly express my concern about the presence of the FSA Navy in the Baltic and Black Seas.
    Can’t sit at home? Row away from our ports on the navigator to your home. angry
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 22 2016 08: 00
    +1
    The United States finally believed that their warships and aircraft can feel at home anywhere in the world.

    Type of untouchables? Yes, they saw such ... at distant frontiers! We flew and WILL fly where we want and where there is a need! angry
  • Million
    Million April 22 2016 08: 02
    0
    The fact that the American fleet is located on the borders of Russia is a fat minus to our authorities!
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK April 22 2016 08: 07
      -6
      and what they are forbidden to swim? what is the minus to our authorities? minus you, for idle talk.
      1. Million
        Million April 22 2016 08: 25
        +4
        minus you for stupidity
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 22 2016 10: 14
          -3
          A naive "Russian", he will take responsibility himself and bring everything down to the authorities. You also ask the president why the roads in your city are crooked. Even the US warship is allowed to sail in the Baltic.
        2. AdekvatNICK
          AdekvatNICK April 22 2016 13: 46
          -2
          stupid is you. So you can not answer the question that the United States violated swimming in the Black Sea?
      2. Shuttle
        Shuttle April 22 2016 10: 09
        +3
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        and what they are forbidden to swim? what is the minus to our authorities? minus you, for idle talk.

        And what, ours are forbidden to fly?
        1. AdekvatNICK
          AdekvatNICK April 22 2016 13: 45
          -2
          just wanted to know what violates the usa legally swimming in the black sea? in the end, stupid people zinnusili.
  • Taygerus
    Taygerus April 22 2016 08: 04
    +4
    we didn’t call them to our borders, so that let them worry over the ocean at home, and if they like that they are constantly being crippled so that they wanted it, we don’t draw in front of them
  • Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb April 22 2016 08: 08
    0
    The US military has once again expressed "concern" about the activity of Russian aviation over the Baltic Sea. Concern is expressed by the state, which is several thousand kilometers away from the Baltic Sea, and whose warships run only a few dozen kilometers from the borders of the Russian Federation.


    Yesterday, on this occasion, everyone popularly explained why mattresses need this.
  • dzvero
    dzvero April 22 2016 08: 13
    +1
    But I am curious why the Russian Aerospace Forces since last year is exactly 'Donald Cook'? For some business, just happened to turn up then, or do you have fans in your headquarters of either the work of Vysotsky or the Disney duck Donald?
    1. kotvov
      kotvov April 22 2016 11: 49
      +1
      But I'm curious why the Russian Aerospace Forces since last year, h.r.o. r.y.t is 'Donald Cook'? ,,
      maybe you remember there is a song: well, why the aborigines ate Cook, apparently there is a fan of Vladimir Vysotsky in the General Staff, so he is nightmare. request
      but seriously, apparently it is equipped with reconnaissance equipment, everywhere it sticks its nose.
  • Alex ..
    Alex .. April 22 2016 08: 15
    +3
    It's time for them to rename their trough.
  • Abbra
    Abbra April 22 2016 08: 20
    +4
    Once upon a time, our Foreign Ministry should write a note that we express dissatisfaction with the existence of the United States as an arrogant and aggressive power.
  • Nasty
    Nasty April 22 2016 08: 34
    +2
    We are not at war with Russia, we have no reason to think that they will attack our ships. However, the commander (of the ship), who has the right to self-defense, must decide quickly. We do not want him to make a mistake in the calculations, based on their inappropriate behavior.
    So you are just at war with Russia. The Americans sat in our inland sea with inappropriate behavior. It's time to wane off.
  • atamankko
    atamankko April 22 2016 08: 57
    0
    Behave decently, the destroyer, got rid of and scratch your stall,
    do not force the State Department to "attend" once again, it is not good.
  • Berber
    Berber April 22 2016 08: 59
    +2
    They practically express dissatisfaction with the fact that we are. Like "che in a hat" or "che devil hats".
  • xoxaru
    xoxaru April 22 2016 08: 59
    0
    "
    We are not at war with Russia, we have no reason to think that they will attack our ships. However, the commander (of the ship), who has the right to self-defense, must make a decision quickly. We don't want him to miscalculate based on their inappropriate behavior. "

    I wonder how in their opinion aircraft without weapons will attack the ship? Will they go to ram?
  • TOZ-34
    TOZ-34 April 22 2016 09: 03
    0
    Quote: bronik
    To NATO’s demand to punish the Russian pilot Su-24, which frightened the sailors of their destroyer in the Baltic Sea, Lavrov replies: “As a result of the investigation, the guilty one, Captain Sidorchuk, was identified. For this, Major Sidorchuk was reprimanded. (And an extraordinary rank was awarded) If Major Sidorchuk once again throws something like that, then we will declare Colonel Sidorchuk the most severe reprimand .. (and award the order).
    With such edits (in quotation marks), it sounds better.
  • sergey2017
    sergey2017 April 22 2016 09: 13
    0
    We also do not want our pilots to make mistakes in calculations, based on the inappropriate behavior of a warship and reconnaissance aircraft located in the immediate vicinity of the Russian border!
  • Yun Klob
    Yun Klob April 22 2016 09: 46
    0
    Having studied the experience of using "Donald Cook" near the coast of Russia, the Pentagon demanded a significant increase in the number of latrines on the projected military ships.
  • Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar April 22 2016 09: 48
    +2
    What can we say about the Baltic if Psaki was concerned about our teachings in the Astrakhan steppe.
  • Vetal999
    Vetal999 April 22 2016 09: 54
    +1
    Zadolbali your complaints! Run away from the Baltic and the issue is resolved.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 22 2016 10: 29
    0
    We can put it cooler - if you were going home displeased, we don't give a damn about you. You boobies generally insolent, look at yourself, clowns:
  • givigor71
    givigor71 April 22 2016 10: 48
    +1
    But what about the brave American sailor? laughing
  • karakuin
    karakuin April 22 2016 11: 09
    0
    Apparently pendals upset Abamia. Because they are not afraid of them at all and still passionately want to give in a tender face - they can hardly restrain themselves. And this is unusual, how is it? Well, they grunted at all ends, but notice the words are carefully chosen so that God forbid they will not interpret something. Nice - they stink in unison. Sailed to the Black Sea - snapped it off, sailed to the Baltic Sea - again a bummer. Wondering where to hide next time? This Cook has already become a household name. It seems like they want Europa to split up on the grandmother, but with such jokes it turns out to be cheaper to lift the sanction and be friends. After all, the vassals have a turnip and itch. And for the future - a proposal: about 5 helicopters with the Khibiny in the order of changing the guard at an acceptable "professional" distance. Hang for three days so that this brave battle scow is looking for a course in the fog through the stars, to make a documentary - here is a low-budget Oscar for the whole of NATO. Maybe I'm wrong, but for some reason it seems that 24 episodes of 3 hours are quite a pleasant format.
  • koshmarik
    koshmarik April 22 2016 11: 13
    +2
    The State Department resembles a squeamishly hysterical mother-in-law who is always dissatisfied with everything and pokes her nose everywhere. Crimea became Russian - hysteria, flying around Cook - swearing, banning the Mejlis in Crimea - discontent, helped them to untie the Syrian knot - sheer skepticism, Savchenko was condemned - a terrible howl and so on without end. I'm tired of it. After the next screams I just want to launch a couple of Yars on this mother-in-law.
  • Demeter
    Demeter April 22 2016 11: 32
    0
    Where is the USA and where is the Baltic Sea? Yankees get out!
  • givigor71
    givigor71 April 22 2016 11: 53
    0
    Apparently, the fate of the destroyer will be the same as that of the "glorious" Marine Donald Cook, who went missing in Vietnam ... laughing
  • Maikl59
    Maikl59 April 22 2016 12: 01
    +2
    Shame ...
  • cergey51046
    cergey51046 April 22 2016 12: 09
    0
    I would drown them. Let them swim, don’t go, but swim, like Mr. .. at home.
  • Verdun
    Verdun April 22 2016 15: 15
    0
    The United States again expressed "dissatisfaction" with the actions of Russian military aviation over the Baltic Sea
    It is time for us to express dissatisfaction with the actions of the US Air Force in the Caribbean ...
  • mamont5
    mamont5 April 22 2016 16: 38
    +1
    "However, the commander (of the ship), who has the right to self-defense, must make a decision quickly. We do not want him to make a mistake in his calculations based on their inappropriate behavior."

    And if such a decision is made by the commander of the coastal defense of the Russian Navy base, at the very threshold of which warships of the crafty Yankees and their lackeys snoop?
  • Stariknv
    Stariknv April 22 2016 16: 52
    0
    For some reason, only the United States began to resent their own actions on the border with Russia. American warships can be located anywhere in the world’s oceans in the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea and no one should control them because they protect America and their interests that lead to wars and the creation of terrorist organizations that kill civilians.
  • Lelek
    Lelek April 22 2016 18: 15
    0
    (Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis reiterated US stance on the "inadmissibility of Russian aviation.")

    Today in the morning I sipped some coffee and I was completely disturbed by the flights of American aircraft near Galvestone (which is near Houston). And it upset me so much that I was ready to call Shoigu to warn the chief of all US staffs about my position on the "inadmissibility of American aviation actions", otherwise - a petition to SPORTLOTO.