Time has published a list of "the most influential people in the world." Vladimir Putin - 29th

93
Time magazine has published its version of hundreds of the most influential people in the world. At the head of the ranking was the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagard. The company in the top three was made up of such persons as US Secretary of State John Kerry, as well as German Chancellor Angela Merkel. US President Barack Obama was in the 13-th place, "passing" forward such American politicians as Donald Trump (4-th place) and Bernie Sanders (7 place). Trump is a candidate for Republican candidates, Sanders is from Democratic.

Time has published a list of "the most influential people in the world." Vladimir Putin - 29th


President of Russia Vladimir Putin magazine Time put on a place 29 - next to the Turkish President Erdogan.

According to Time magazine, the influence of the Russian president is significantly inferior to the “influence” of such politicians as Justin Trudeau (Canadian Prime Minister), Mauricio Macri (President of Argentina) and Francois Hollande (President of France). Moreover, the commander of the US Air Force Pacific Command Lori Robinson is "significantly more influential" than Vladimir Putin in the world. And even more influential on the planet Earth is the commander of the American "anti-terrorism" forces in Syria and Iraq, General John Macfarland ...

So, in the first place in "Time" - Christine Lagard. The most remarkable thing is that, based on a recent sociological survey conducted in the United States, only 8% of respondents were able to answer the question of who is the IMF Managing Director today, given that about a quarter of respondents could not “decode” the abbreviation of the International Monetary Fund .
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +46
    April 21 2016 16: 48
    They made us laugh and then they will say that this is not a political order.
    1. +31
      April 21 2016 16: 50
      Anglo-Saxon scam. And they realize the order annually.
      1. +3
        April 21 2016 19: 48
        Quote: tiredwithall
        Anglo-Saxon scam. And they realize the order annually.

        Breaking dried roach. belay
      2. +2
        April 21 2016 20: 03
        Quote: tiredwithall
        Anglo-Saxon scam. And they realize the order annually.
        1. +1
          April 22 2016 03: 30
          She doesn’t work on Russian Railways? Sleeveless reminds overalls of guys from Russian Railways.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +19
      April 21 2016 16: 56
      everyone knows perfectly well who is really an influential politician. whose name they are afraid to pronounce
      1. +34
        April 21 2016 17: 04
        In fact, it makes no sense to pay any attention to this beauty contest.
        At least because the magazine is this American weekly. Headquartered in New York. It allegedly covers the ratings of the most influential. In this magazine, Americans tell the whole world who they think is the right kid (or wench).

        Let's look objectively. The Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund is certainly cool.
        But whom the Americans consider threat No. 1. Someone who is guaranteed to destroy them. And for what this someone can destroy them, but for the fact that the Americans themselves can stick their nose too far. And in my opinion this is not Christine Logart.

        As well as various rating agencies with speaking type names - MUUDIS. This is the classic money-sawing out of thin air. Give me money - and I will tell everyone that you are good. Yes, you would not go to a bad mom cabbage soup slurp with the muds.
        For often all these agencies magazines do not give objective estimates, but stupidly PR, you may be steamed if you pay.

        And again, the most influential person for whom and where? Logart - the most influential person can in Europe, but in the same Papua New Guinea she is nobody. Or in some sort of Zimbabwe. Or there in Peru, in Nepal, in Kyrgyzstan - who is Logart.
        From the fact that Putin they have in 29th place in Russia missiles did not become smaller.
        1. +6
          April 21 2016 17: 26
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Let's look objectively. The Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund is certainly cool.

          Vlad, this is cool, exactly "one maid" ... you know as well as me. this is a "cool consumable" ...
          1. +1
            April 21 2016 17: 31
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            Vlad, this is cool, exactly "one maid" ... you know as well as me. this is a "cool consumable" ...

            What are we talking about. That's exactly what is not cool, but "cool".
      2. +3
        April 21 2016 17: 23
        Yes Yes. The most influential is the one whose name throws them into a shiver and who they are afraid to speak out loud ..... what about the Canadian Prime Minister? Who is this?fellow
        1. +3
          April 21 2016 17: 35
          Kent0001
          Well, I think, to be honest, the MOST influential in this crossword puzzle, which is filled at random by the editor-in-chief of this tabloid ... is simply not there, no one will write about them and it suits them perfectly, because it is likely that this magazine belongs to them themselves.
      3. WKS
        +14
        April 21 2016 17: 29
        And in my opinion, the most influential person in the world is Kim Jong-un. If he orders to stand on his head, then within a few minutes 50 million will stand on this part of the body. Who else is capable of this? Angela Merkel or Hollande?
      4. +2
        April 21 2016 19: 07
        everyone knows perfectly well who is really an influential politician. whose name they are afraid to pronounce

        But Obama got nowhere else to get ratings during his presidency !!! laughing
        1. +1
          April 21 2016 19: 55
          Quote: Persistent
          everyone knows perfectly well who is really an influential politician. whose name they are afraid to pronounce

          But Obama got nowhere else to get ratings during his presidency !!! laughing
    4. +13
      April 21 2016 16: 56
      Quote: cniza
      They made us laugh and then they will say that this is not a political order.


      I see no reason for us to "burn" from this.
      How many of us read the Times?
    5. KAV
      +7
      April 21 2016 17: 02
      Yes, what kind of order ... So, it’s just a circle of shaggy idiots who praise praises to each other and are proud of themselves, trying to pass it off as objectivity.

      Why, without fear of sin,
      Does the cuckoo praise the Rooster?
      For praising the Cuckoo.
    6. +7
      April 21 2016 17: 06
      Hu.nya complete! And where are the Rothschilds with the Rockefellers and other Ameri rappoports. Well, the very ones that the FAS say to all these gentlemen listed above, their mother ...? Six banking houses, one Putin is really influential, because independent.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. -1
          April 21 2016 17: 11
          Go to ... Erysipelas! Not written for you. I’m not writing for the wretched.
      2. -5
        April 21 2016 17: 28
        Quote: gergi
        Hu.nya complete! And where are the Rothschilds with the Rockefellers and other Ameri rappoports. Well, the very ones that the FAS say to all these gentlemen listed above, their mother ...? Six banking houses, one Putin is really influential, because independent.

        a little +, I didn’t put it, but ... I read it to the end ... about the independent one. From the Fed, from the IMF. From ... oh.
        1. +9
          April 21 2016 17: 49
          Is it really like going to smear mud on the President of Russia? Who from .... after Stalin also worked for the country? Putin is not my relative, he does not affect my career growth, my salary and relations with my wife do not depend on him. I consider him a worthy person, a talented leader, a smart politician, an insidious opponent of our enemies. This is not flattery. I think so. You think differently, it is your right. Just do not shit in the neighbors do not care. This activity is not grateful.
          1. -10
            April 21 2016 18: 20
            Quote: gergi
            Is it necessarily going to smear mud on to the president Russia?
            well, firstly: It's dirty, to call the President of Russia- "to the president",Further:
            Who from .... after Stalin also worked for the country?
            where did our defense power come from? do not answer. you are not up to date. you are a loser, or a victim of the exam ... Further:
            Putin is not my relative, he does not affect my career growth, my salary and relations with my wife do not depend on him.
            accept my regrets ... Next:
            This is not flattery. I think so.
            and I think so. that flattery ....)))) Further:
            Quote: gergi
            Just do not shit in the neighbors do not care.
            sorry, this is not for me ... firstly, not a camel, and secondly, d.r.r.m.o. - in your mouth? whatWho are you? foolthirdly: GDP is not my neighbor (unfortunately) for this, let me take my leave, and ... do not pester the community with stupid pompous comments ... (free advice)
            1. +7
              April 21 2016 18: 35
              Snobbery and stupidity are always nearby, you are our great thinker. My condolences. What you portrayed here in a pompous manner is ridiculous and off topic. The head is not in order to majestically call it, but in order to think. Try at least occasionally. Maybe you will like it.
              1. -4
                April 21 2016 18: 37
                Quote: gergi
                The head is not to proudly wave it,

                what to do? ... belay ok, don’t answer, because you are on the Black List, young ... lol
            2. -1
              April 22 2016 14: 52
              Andrey Yuryevich
              Again, you call all stupid wonderful you are ours?)))
              And again not a word in essence) would not be dishonored
    7. +2
      April 21 2016 17: 07
      Quote: cniza
      They made us laugh and then they will say that this is not a political order.

      Of course it’s not political, everything is according to ,,,,,, honest ,,,,,,,,. It’s different in the stronghold of democracy ...................
      1. KAV
        +3
        April 21 2016 17: 16
        But what about? There, today Merkel received another honest award of four freedoms in the Netherlands. Gygs ...
        On Thursday, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte presented German Chancellor Angela Merkel with the International Four Freedoms Award, which annually honors four professed freedom principles, as outlined by U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt: freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion, freedom from want and freedom from fear.

        The presentation ceremony was held in the Dutch city of Middelburg, a Ukrinform correspondent reports.

        “Merkel played a key role in overcoming the financial crisis in the EU. As a European leader, she negotiated a diplomatic solution (de-escalation) of the situation in Ukraine (Minsk negotiations and Minsk agreements in the interests of peace and security in Europe. She demonstrated moral leadership as the chancellor of all Germans independently from faith or ethnicity in connection with the emergence of the anti-Islamic movement Pegida in 2014, "- noted on the website of the Roosevelt Foundation.

        It is also noted that during the migrant crisis, Merkel adhered to the humanitarian principles of protecting people fleeing war and conflicts in the Middle East, Africa and Asia, and also made efforts to resolve the migrant crisis by seeking a solution to the conflict in Syria and the region.

        The Four Freedoms Award is presented once a year alternately in New York (USA) and Middelburg (Netherlands), where the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute and the Roosevelt Foundation are located.
    8. -4
      April 21 2016 17: 24
      Time has published a list of "the most influential people in the world." Vladimir Putin - 29th

      so gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club ... you are nobody! ZERO! fiction of a sick imagination! Kolya Rockefeller and, with him, read and cry ... belay wassat
      1. +5
        April 21 2016 18: 39
        so gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club ... you are nobody ,,
        they, by the way, try and do not shine anywhere. they, one must understand, their ratings.
        1. -3
          April 21 2016 19: 01
          Quote: kotvov
          so gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club ... you are nobody ,,
          they, by the way, try and do not shine anywhere. they, one must understand, their ratings.

          "touch" ... hi
    9. +3
      April 21 2016 17: 36
      Quote: cniza
      they will say that this is not a political order.

      Indeed, this is not a political order, this is self-promotion. Yes to the Times and the president of Russia advertised? This is against the policy of America. But K. Lagarde is in the first place because it bends low before the owners of the Fed.
    10. 0
      April 21 2016 18: 29
      I agree, but in general, at VO they might not have put it in principle.
    11. +1
      April 21 2016 21: 54
      Yes Yes! Recognizing leadership in the global arena of GDP means signing your own worthlessness!
  2. +6
    April 21 2016 16: 49
    Lists, ratings - all this is water for the western man in the street, those who generate ideas, then they rule the souls of this world. To them, publicity is boring and unnecessary.
  3. +4
    April 21 2016 16: 50
    Putin is the first, everyone else is in line for him
    And the West should be in the opera itself because it can be influenced only by pressure from the United States. And Lagarde is generally a dummy, the gentleman blunders and does it. Maybe I’m wrong but I haven’t seen lately how she influenced Russia and generally except it does not affect Ukraine.
  4. +6
    April 21 2016 16: 50
    winked Western media are so direct. Almost children.
  5. +16
    April 21 2016 16: 50
    Most of the citizens of Russia do not care what place in the rating "Time" Vladimir Putin.
    And to Putin himself too. Let them play with their spillikins and indulge their vanity with some place in some kind of "Time" ...
    People give an assessment to politicians and leadership of states. And in Russia, Putin's ratings for 80%. Comments are unnecessary, although there are questions for the president on certain issues of economic and social policy.
    1. -6
      April 21 2016 19: 06
      Quote: sever.56
      People give an assessment to politicians and leadership of states. And in Russia, Putin's ratings for 80%

      well ... 146 even ... it was.E. Pamfilova wonders how much she will say ... on the following? (don’t yell, I'm not an enemy to Putin, but I'm interested)
      1. 0
        April 21 2016 22: 11
        Andrey, welcome hi
        I’m not going to scream, not in my habits, and there is no reason to comment to scream.
        Lizoblyuds, ready to bend, so that, God forbid, they were torn off from the trough, there were always enough. Any percentage will be written, although I doubt that any instructions from above (I mean the Presidential Administration) are being received. The trouble is that Putin has to deal, literally, with manual control of the country. I cannot understand why he does not make a radical decision on the leadership and composition of the government. Everything has become so stagnant there, and economic policy is being pursued in line with the "valuable instructions" of the IMF and others like it.
        As for the interest that the gracious pleasures will try to draw, I doubt that E. Pamfilova will allow this. At least, I don’t remember that she was involved in some dirty business, although I do not really like her liberal views.
  6. +2
    April 21 2016 16: 51
    Something does not fit our 29th place with political processes. Everyone is looking to sort out tension and establish dialogue with Putin. You can notice not him with everyone, but everything with him. And then what is our place?
  7. +1
    April 21 2016 16: 54
    All "sixes" are in the first "six! Lagarte, how did she become influential in fear? The USA rubs at the knee.
  8. +4
    April 21 2016 16: 54
    One can’t understand anything that’s blatant Saxons, then Putin steers, number one, and then they took us and stuffed them into 29th place, well, okay, somehow on their Time and its rating ... it’s all the same, which by the way comrade north clearly noted above ahead of my thought
    1. 0
      April 21 2016 18: 47
      Yes, ordinary trolling from the west. Moreover, recently all their media have been trying to "bite", somehow offend, banal offend our president. The first thing that comes to mind when assessing such a situation is "to know Pug is strong, barking at an elephant."
  9. +1
    April 21 2016 16: 56
    What is it? Do we need to start printing one-to-one dollars and scattering them over the territories of countries in particularly crowded places?
    It's good that the Time version fool have no influence on citizens of the Russian Federation ...
  10. +3
    April 21 2016 16: 56
    Rave. By what, interestingly, criteria were determined by the place in the ranking? And maybe in the 1st place the head of the Rothschild clan (Rockefellers, Morgan)? Who controls the largest amount of capital is the most important? Or the one who truly decides the fate of the world (as in Syria)? Be vigilant - everything is relative! Everything, everything ...
  11. +2
    April 21 2016 16: 56
    Time has published a list of "the most influential people in the world." Vladimir Putin - 29th
    Who is this Time for us? We will publish our list in "Ogonyok" or in "Arguments and Facts" and put everyone there in their place, as we see it. And one shouldn't sigh about our non-recognition of their corrupt "democracy".
  12. Riv
    +2
    April 21 2016 16: 57
    It remains to Christine to marry Putin. And that's it in the hat. World domination achieved.
    :)
    1. 0
      April 21 2016 17: 02
      She is dumb, and purely mathematically this pair will not even be in the top ten)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  13. +5
    April 21 2016 17: 01
    Sanders above Putin? Higher than a man who could theoretically destroy America with Europe to the heap ?? Such a normal rating. I would not be surprised if Navalny was included in this rating Yes . well, or sweet feel ...
    1. -1
      April 21 2016 17: 38
      Quote: wicked partisan
      Sanders above Putin? Higher than a man who could theoretically destroy America with Europe to the heap ?? Such a normal rating. I would not be surprised if Navalny was included in this rating Yes . well, or sweet feel ...

      hello, angry, forest Semi-EKT ... hi
      1. 0
        April 21 2016 20: 49
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Semi-ect
        Hi, retirement! drinks
        Che, on the ice we’re moving forward lol ? And then we battle in the rotations has not yet taken place request . Didn't change my mind wink ?
      2. +1
        April 21 2016 20: 50
        Quote: wicked partisan
        Sanders above Putin? - / / -

        By the way, Bernie is the most adequate presidential candidate in this election (sorry not to win ...). wink
  14. +2
    April 21 2016 17: 01
    Quote: Riv
    And that's it in the hat. World domination achieved.
    :)


    And Putin did something bad to you personally, but God be with you, he won’t drink so much. hi
    1. +2
      April 21 2016 17: 09
      Quote: Ros 56
      God be with you, he won’t drink so much.

      They say that we are the most drinking nation. So, if we all get together and drink, we can’t handle such a dose.
      1. 0
        April 21 2016 17: 40
        Quote: EvgNik
        we can’t handle such a dose.

        for all, do not speak! am Cho do not drink, hide! Yes drink it in the morning! drinks
  15. +7
    April 21 2016 17: 01
    Ooooooo ... only 29th place .. even in the top 10 the "darkest" did not enter ... So fuckle, gentlemen, you are scaring the whole world with Putin and Russia .. how would it be GDP in the first place .. scare friend friend, each other .. Once you are such influential .. smile
  16. +1
    April 21 2016 17: 02
    Time magazine has published its version of hundreds of the most influential people in the world. At the head of the ranking was the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagard. The company in the top three was made up of such persons as US Secretary of State John Kerry, as well as German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

    And to me these ratings, who occupies what place there, are absolutely purple. It is important what people do and how I feel about it, and where Time puts them - they don't give a damn. To wipe the journal with this, although it is unsuitable for this.
  17. +3
    April 21 2016 17: 03
    I am not a supporter of Putin, but such a rating is a cheating distortion.
  18. +1
    April 21 2016 17: 06
    Announce the entire list, please. And we ourselves will put the candidates in their places. More precisely it will turn out.
  19. +1
    April 21 2016 17: 06
    It is a sin to laugh at the poor, but I will still laugh at these compilers ... It seems to me that I am not alone, we will wait for the reaction to this "battle sheet" from the same Westerners ...
  20. 0
    April 21 2016 17: 09
    They put themselves in an uncomfortable position - cancer. Annual favorite pose. And what else to expect - Western civilization.
  21. +3
    April 21 2016 17: 09
    Yes, do not care for this Legard. Tolley case Don Pedro. The infants themselves, despite congenital diabetes
  22. +4
    April 21 2016 17: 16
    At first I was surprised by the choice of the first place, but on reflection I agreed with the choice. It is this man who, without firing a shot, can drive an entire country into ruin.

    PS
    Been in Time and Putin.
    1. +1
      April 21 2016 17: 42
      Quote: professor
      It is this man who, without firing a shot, can drive an entire country into ruin.

      Oleg, and ours can ... and not one ... (ICBM launch, not a shot?) BUT, it’s better not to check! wink hi
      1. +4
        April 21 2016 17: 51
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Oleg, and ours can ... and not one ... (ICBM launch, not a shot?) BUT, it’s better not to check!

        In theory, it can, but in practice ... wassat Who believes in nuclear war here? on the other hand, look into your wallet and the prices on the shelves and think about who really affects your life. wink
        1. +2
          April 21 2016 18: 29
          Quote: professor
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Oleg, and ours can ... and not one ... (ICBM launch, not a shot?) BUT, it’s better not to check!

          In theory, it can, but in practice ... wassat Who believes in nuclear war here? on the other hand, look into your wallet and the prices on the shelves and think about who really affects your life. wink

          practice Oleg, it is better not to check, well, "UTB" nafig ... but on the second point ... what I don’t even know where to start !!! But, to blame, for sure, those who pull at the end of the ruble (bucks) ... and, at the beginning .. am
          1. +1
            April 21 2016 19: 23
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            practice Oleg, it is better not to check, well, "UTB" nafig ...

            And nobody seriously considers it, this "threat".

            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            and on the second point ... I don’t even know where to start

            Well, certainly not from the sun. As it turned out, he was not even able to influence the life of his subjects. sad

            Quote: Shpagolom
            Do you also think that the regional PU is such a leader?

            Not. I do not think so. I am sure about that. South America? There is no presence and influence. North America, Africa, S.V. Asia, the same story.

            Quote: MMX
            It is unlikely that such opportunities are available to her (or anyone else in her position). The events in Ukraine have shown that the "fixer" is in completely different hands ...

            I don’t know who pulls his strings, but I’m sure that he is able to turn a large country into ruin.
            1. MMX
              +1
              April 22 2016 08: 18
              Quote: professor


              Quote: MMX
              It is unlikely that such opportunities are available to her (or anyone else in her position). The events in Ukraine have shown that the "fixer" is in completely different hands ...

              I don’t know who pulls his strings, but I’m sure that he is able to turn a large country into ruin.


              The navel will unleash from turning a large country into ruin.
              1. -2
                April 22 2016 09: 28
                Quote: MMX
                The navel will unleash from turning a large country into ruin.

                Somehow did not get loose. wink
                1. MMX
                  +2
                  April 22 2016 11: 24
                  Quote: professor
                  Quote: MMX
                  The navel will unleash from turning a large country into ruin.

                  Somehow did not get loose. wink



                  This is all the IMF did ????

                  According to sabzh: it took an excessive strain of efforts of the entire Western world and more than 70 years for the USSR to split. But about the ruin or ruin, as recent events show, we are not talking about it at all.
                  1. +2
                    April 22 2016 12: 15
                    Quote: MMX
                    But about the ruin or ruin, as recent events show, we are not talking about it at all.

                    Not yet evening.
                    1. MMX
                      +1
                      April 22 2016 18: 06
                      Quote: professor
                      Quote: MMX
                      But about the ruin or ruin, as recent events show, we are not talking about it at all.

                      Not yet evening.


                      By the way, I also wanted to write this. It’s not yet evening: how long the West will last and when the USSR is reborn, time will tell. The confrontation is not over yet (and at the highest level).
                      1. 0
                        April 23 2016 09: 29
                        Quote: MMX
                        By the way, I also wanted to write this. It’s not yet evening: how long the West will last and when the USSR is reborn, time will tell. The confrontation is not over yet (and at the highest level).

                        Yeah, the scoop will be reborn from the sewer where it was lowered, and the West will finally rot. wait for a moment. laughing
    2. +1
      April 21 2016 18: 01
      .... Could ... maybe, but nowadays PU cannot be in the top 3 ... he is able to "GUN" too, or do you also think that PU is a regional leader?
    3. MMX
      +1
      April 21 2016 18: 11
      Quote: professor
      At first I was surprised by the choice of the first place, but on reflection I agreed with the choice. It is this man who, without firing a shot, can drive an entire country into ruin.



      It is unlikely that such opportunities are available to her (or anyone else in her position). The events in Ukraine have shown that the "fixer" is in completely different hands ...
  23. +3
    April 21 2016 17: 30
    Yes, they only "influence" - by talk, "concern", sanctions.
    And our GDP only warns and neutralizes all these "influences" so that those who "influence" do not do too much.
  24. 0
    April 21 2016 17: 35
    By God, like the children in the nursery group, these Amerikosy - shit under themselves and throw their shit in all directions.
  25. 0
    April 21 2016 17: 35
    Achievements of Arabs and Greeks, what, dog down the drain ?! Oh, no, it dawned on me: it’s they converted inches into millimeters, of course for them Obama 25,4
  26. hartlend
    0
    April 21 2016 17: 35
    Hope everyone guessed it was a farce. And not because Putin is the 29th. Usually influential people remain in the shadows.
  27. 0
    April 21 2016 17: 40
    Etozh LGBT community, normal people are not allowed to the top! Just wondering what Lagarde would do for 82% approval
    people?!? hi
  28. +1
    April 21 2016 17: 42
    Designed for dropouts, but in Russia the people are literate.
  29. +1
    April 21 2016 17: 46
    It's time not to pay attention to this nonsense. Nobody will point out the real most influential people.
  30. 0
    April 21 2016 17: 55
    If C. Lagarde is the most influential person in the world, then why do the Americans increase the military budget and squeak about Putin’s unpredictability?
    It’s time to budget the United States.
  31. +3
    April 21 2016 18: 03
    Time published a list of 28 politicians who really want to get out of the shadow of Putin ... and who apparently have no other way to surpass his popularity.
  32. +3
    April 21 2016 18: 16
    It's hard to argue with uduotamu (I mean Time). Or maybe not? Let the Prime Minister of Canada rejoice at his "influence" in the world (how is he there? ...) and the Commander of the US Navy (well, this is not worth remembering ....). Seriously, all these "ratings" (in politics, economics, education, etc.) are the purest element of the information war raging on the planet. This should be treated accordingly.
    1. 0
      April 22 2016 02: 53
      I would add ...
      "I gave your opinion a spin,
      And the axis was my genital organ. "
      Valeria Cherkasova
  33. 0
    April 21 2016 18: 16
    Quote: professor
    In theory, it can, but in practice ... Who here believes in nuclear war? on the other hand, look into your wallet and the prices on the shelves and think about who really affects your life.

    Well, if you are so caring, then, as the saying goes, "Don't teach us how to live, but rather help us financially"
  34. +1
    April 21 2016 18: 41
    1) Christine Lagarde - boldly refused Putin a loan (which he did not ask for)
    2) John Kerry - boldly warned Putin, promising to bring down his planes
    3) Angela Merkel - once bravely scared Labrador Connie

    After this, Putin may not be included in the rating at all - and so everything is clear.
  35. +1
    April 21 2016 18: 48
    Looked briefly at the news of Inopress: "Putin, Putin, Putin ...." Even dill with the name of our President wake up, work during the day and go to bed, "and is Volodymyr Volodymyrovich alive there?" Not to mention other euros and Anglo-Saxons? About Arabs, Asians. Latin Americans and Africans do not even have to say - everything is written: "What did Putin say? What did he say about us, or about them, or others?" I would like to recommend chapters. to Time editor - release your magazine in rolls, preferably without text and in soft packaging like toilet paper !!! And your "ratings" will become more objective and popular, and it will be convenient for users !!!
  36. +1
    April 21 2016 19: 44
    Delirium of course terry. The only assumption by which it can be taken seriously is the definition of the very concept of peace. And the world, they mean, is definitely an Anglo-Saxon world. So Putin may not be so influential in this gadyushnik, but we are working on it ...
  37. +2
    April 21 2016 20: 02
    Announce the entire list of please. Where is our non-fallow friend, a campaign out of competition.
    Here the gentlemen write that, unlike V. Putin, someone Madame Lagarde can plunge the country into ruin without a single shot, please give an example. Only unlike her, our President can pull such a country out of chaos. And do not about our prices, look at yours.
  38. +1
    April 21 2016 20: 31
    There are no words except HA-HA-HA. How they did not include PARASCHENKO in the first three! The magazine set its own rating.
  39. 0
    April 21 2016 21: 29
    You can respect someone many times, but they still see who lies under whom, and who scored and did not give up.
  40. 0
    April 21 2016 22: 55
    Yes, they went, influential in the south.
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. 0
    April 22 2016 04: 42
    Apparently they are waiting for some reaction from Russia, we don’t give a damn about the magazines and ratings, as well as themselves, from the big bell tower.
  43. 0
    April 22 2016 08: 10
    Hello!! Yes, Putin’s grandmothers were not found in Panama, which means he (Putin) cannot occupy a high place. And all the fuss is about helping our liberal democrats smash and blame the President forwards. He did not manage. I did not like it after the speech at the UN and the further actions of Russia. Such an established business broke down in the Middle East. You are absolutely right the strongest who received interest from this business will never be named. And Putin had the imprudence to call someone. This is not democratic even in the light of DEMOCRACY.
  44. 0
    April 22 2016 12: 34
    Well, why print this "Times" nonsense in VO, that - there are no more pressing topics? But, if we are talking about it, I would put Breivik and the Bilderberg Club at the head of this state list. stop bully
  45. The comment was deleted.