Media: America does not keep pace with the development of Russian reconnaissance aircraft

93
The Kremlin’s large investments in weapons and equipment modernization programs have yielded good results, according to an article by US Marine veteran Cattlin Patterson for Diplomat magazine.

“Some consider the Russian Armed Forces as an army of powers in the long run, but the US can only envy the results of the military modernization program. We are talking about updating the arsenal of conventional (conventional) weapons, especially the means of electronic reconnaissance and electronic warfare (EW) ", - quotes Patterson RIA News.

One of these means is the IL-20 - reconnaissance aircraft used in the SAR.

Media: America does not keep pace with the development of Russian reconnaissance aircraft


“It is equipped with side-view radars, optical sensors, an infrared scanner and a satellite communications system for exchanging data. IL-20 can be used for radio interception and scanning of enemy radio broadcasts, which makes it possible to determine the place of concentration of the opponent’s forces, ”the author notes.

“Another reconnaissance aircraft that appeared as part of the Russian air group in Syria was the all-seeing aircraft of the integrated reconnaissance Tu-214Р,” the article says.



According to Patterson, “on board the Tu-214Р there are systems both electronic (ELINT) and radio intelligence (SIGINT), with their help, you can intercept signals from cellular communications, from airplanes and military vehicles, which allows you to determine where the enemy is, what number of forces and what means of communication he uses. "

As previously stated by the deputy head of the US Cybernetic Command, Ronald Pontius, “Russian reconnaissance aircraft carry America a threat, Washington is not keeping pace with their development.”

“The United States has long been overly focused on counterinsurgency operations and is stuck in a series of conflicts from Iraq to Afghanistan. As a result, America has forgotten about the development of its own EW assets, which will be required for a conventional war with powers like Russia or China, ” - concluded Patterson.
  • http://k-ur.ru/forum, Rimma Sadykova
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    April 20 2016 18: 45
    all think of war ...
    with RUSSIA ... fools ...
    the last thing that will be remembered in the USA before the start of the apocalypse is the red button in the hands of HILLARY CLINTON ...
    unless of course she becomes the last president of the United States.
    The Tu-214P looks futuristic because of the side radars ... beautifully, but how does this affect the airworthiness of the airframe?
    1. +15
      April 20 2016 18: 58
      Everywhere they have threats, dangers, they are afraid of everything. What kind of sykuns are you ...
      1. jjj
        +6
        April 20 2016 19: 31
        They really went strained with conventional weapons. Their branch of development went the wrong way. I hope with our help
        1. +16
          April 20 2016 21: 13
          Quote: jjj
          I hope with our help

          - indirect)))). Lack of competition is disastrous. While competing with the USSR, they created very nothing at all - both F-16 and F-15, the same Abrams ... The competitor left (as it turned out, he was not going to die for long at all)) - they started something there rivet - and riveted F-35, or nothing riveted at all.
          1. +26
            April 20 2016 21: 38
            Quote: aksakal
            - indirect)))). Lack of competition is disastrous. While competing with the USSR, they created very nothing at all - both F-16 and F-15, the same Abrams ... The competitor left (as it turned out, he was not going to die for long at all)) - they started something there rivet - and riveted F-35, or nothing riveted at all.

            ---------------
            Well, they had "the end of history" according to Fukuyama, postmodernity, as it were, won, the freedom of Forev. The concept of war has changed too. The Horsemen of the Apocalypse no longer walked across the steppe expanses, but struck with their swords from heaven. Ground forces in such numbers were no longer operated. Hence a certain decline in the development of heavy armored vehicles and artillery. And about "praise us" is the usual whine about money. And Russia poses an EXISTENTIAL threat to the United States. That is, a threat to their survival. Not that we will physically destroy them, but that we will offer more equitable models for the development of the world. Which we really didn't do. Rather, they ended it in 1991, with an alternative model of society.
            1. +12
              April 20 2016 23: 01
              Bullshit all their moans, as always, lie and are looking for additional funding.
              1. SSR
                +1
                April 21 2016 07: 34
                Quote: cniza
                Bullshit all their moans, as always, lie and are looking for additional funding.

                + and in general, this is the reasoning of a military man, not a politician, but a military man of any country compares "himself" with the forces of his potential adversary / rival.
        2. +4
          April 21 2016 11: 26
          their main strength is not in the army, but in "metastases" that are spreading all over the world under the guise of liberalism! but for some reason it seems to me (I hope) that our "immunity" has developed antibodies.
          By the way, we are still lucky. which greatly degraded the political affairs of the Saxons. geniuses such as Brzezinski, Kessinger are a thing of the past, but I still did not rely on this. The more opposition from our side, the faster they will go the evolution of political force. We must be proactive and think strategically.
      2. +1
        April 20 2016 21: 37
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Everywhere they have threats, dangers, they are afraid of everything. What kind of sykuns are you ...

        And they thought all races, except for theirs, would be like redskins with bows ?!
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        "Russian reconnaissance aircraft pose a threat to America, Washington is not keeping pace with their pace of development"

        Are the scouts a threat ?! And what will they "sing" when Russian ships with the latest cruise missiles appear in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean ?!
      3. +2
        April 21 2016 00: 19
        As a result, America forgot about developing its own electronic warfare, which will be required for a conventional war with powers like Russia or China, ”Patterson concluded.

        But this is already interesting! Tovarisch Patterson before blurt out, apparently sickly smoked a fresh crop! fool
      4. +1
        April 21 2016 04: 04
        They see the world differently and this must be reckoned with. Their world is a victory in competition, at any cost. This is their morality. Accordingly, one must speak with them in a language that they understand, in another way - we will not be understood.
      5. 0
        April 22 2016 15: 45
        They soberly understand that they have done such a thing ... As soon as America sticks out a little from behind its shield, they will be torn to shreds. They all, absolutely all fiercely hate, and this hatred is fully deserved. Do not hate the rich and successful as they lie to themselves. And for the dead, robbed, deceived, destroyed ...
        There is, in short, someone to be afraid of.
      6. +1
        April 22 2016 21: 06
        but probably they do diapers well)
      7. 0
        April 23 2016 07: 05
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Everywhere they have threats, dangers, they are afraid of everything. What kind of sykuns are you ...

        Previously, there were always mourners at the funeral, in order to further soften and rejoice the mourning relatives. Do you observe any poorelli?
    2. +12
      April 20 2016 18: 58
      I really want this state of affairs to be included in the system.
      And in all sectors.
      1. +20
        April 20 2016 19: 07
        They forgot to end the article with the traditional phrase: "And they asked for additional funding!" )))))
        1. +1
          April 20 2016 21: 00
          The quote is probably not complete
        2. +3
          April 20 2016 21: 25
          Quote: Semen
          "And they asked for additional funding!" )))))

          about financing belay
          ********
          http://www.vz.ru/news/2016/4/20/806522.html
          US Supreme Court refuses to return frozen $ 2 billion to Iran
          The US Supreme Court refused the Central Bank of Iran to return $ 2 billion of frozen Iranian assets, the court decided to send this money to the families of Americans who died in the attacks in which Iran participated.
          The court ruled Wednesday that the amount should go to American families whose relatives were victims of bombings in Beirut and other attacks, RIA Novosti reports with reference to Reuters.
          More than 1 Americans have previously demanded compensation for the attack, in the organization of which, they believe, Iran was involved.
          Barracks with U.S. peacekeepers stationed in Beirut were bombed on October 23, 1983. Then 241 American soldiers died, in total more than 300 peacekeepers performing the UN mission during the civil war in Lebanon became victims of the attack.

          It is also worth recalling that recently a US court ordered Iran to pay $ 11 billion to insurance companies and relatives of those killed during the September 2001 attacks.

          US Secretary of State John Kerry in mid-January said that the amount of funds that Iran will receive as a result of the lifting of sanctions against him and the unfreezing of his assets abroad will reach about $ 55 billion.
          1. +1
            April 21 2016 16: 47
            So they said last week that they have evidence in the coffin of the involvement of the UAE - the Saudis in these terrorist attacks. Those. whom it is necessary and they will stick. The Accounts are threatened to arrest and demand compensation.
            Can we learn from them? Recall the terrorist attacks in Beslan, Budenovsk and others, falsify decisions on the impossibility of anyone, for the sake of the political moment (for example, Turkey) and arrest all their accounts in the Russian Federation in favor of the victims?
            1. +1
              April 23 2016 07: 27
              ... to falsify decisions about the impossibility of anyone, for the sake of the political moment (for example, Turkey) and ...

              And there is no need to fabricate anything, all the materials are there - just publish them. Moreover, everyone is covered up - and Turkey, and the United States (well, these are primarily), and the Saudis, and Poland, and many of them.
              Well, as compensation (now it’s fashionable) to demand compensation in .... ohiuliard euro :))
    3. +1
      April 20 2016 20: 57
      So he doesn’t need to rush too much. He flies, moves his ears, shakes his head. Its safety is provided by other people.
    4. +10
      April 20 2016 21: 23
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      red button in the hands of HILLARY CLINTON ..


      And we remember for a long time that red button with the inscription "overload" instead of "reset" in the little hands of this madam. Well, is America really so stupid that it would entrust such a, um, nuclear suitcase to a ruffian? I don’t believe it. She's inadequate. Monica says that the playful Billy is next to her and not all gut with her daughter. And this hemorrhoid is going to steer half the planet ??? Something is not so, they are some in the west, no matter how they messed up, but we will rake it later.
    5. +1
      April 20 2016 21: 40
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      unless of course she becomes the last president of the United States.

      She will be "president", but not president feel
    6. -1
      April 21 2016 00: 15
      As Ronald Pontius, deputy head of the US Armed Forces Cybernetics Command, stated earlier, “Russian reconnaissance planes pose a threat to America

      In those on those horseradish in tomato! Recently, all of Russia and Russia, including suddenly began to carry some sort of threat to the United States! But just which one cannot explain from these talking American heads.
      Usually, after such complaints should be a requirement to allocate additional funds for cutting! lol
    7. 0
      April 21 2016 00: 31
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      the last thing that will be remembered in the USA before the start of the apocalypse is the red button in the hands of HILLARY CLINTON ...

      Oh, God forbid! Everything will choke to the fullest if this damn woman becomes the president of America! God forbid!
    8. 0
      April 21 2016 00: 38
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The Tu-214P looks futuristic because of the side radars ... beautifully, but how does this affect the airworthiness of the airframe?

      Not like that. This is not a fighter.
    9. +2
      April 21 2016 07: 05
      He didn’t twist aerobatics, of course, superfluous resistance, but not very strong, enough engines.
    10. +1
      April 21 2016 11: 22
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      beautifully, but how does this affect the flight performance of the airframe?

      definitely affects aerodynamics, but I'm sure it’s not critical. And since Subsonic, you can only talk about a little more fuel consumption. In general, it would be cool if they were drowned a little in the case, we will reduce the resistance to air flow.
      1. 0
        April 22 2016 23: 05
        How to drown them in the case? Firstly, no one will cut the fuselage. And secondly, dipoles (cruciform), judging by the size, work on meter waves. And therefore they need to be drowned at least half a meter ...
        1. 0
          April 25 2016 11: 28
          Make stamped parts, as at the factory make a recess in the sheet of metal. But it's expensive.
          And where does the wave amplitude and depth of the antenna drowning?
    11. +1
      April 23 2016 16: 51
      See how they phrased it! "counterinsurgency operations and !!!
      stuck in a series of conflicts
      Rebels worry! recoursethey care about them winked
      Where is America, and where is the "rebels" ... oh, already this "line" !!! ... long
  2. +7
    April 20 2016 18: 46
    I read this article with pride. Finally, the Americans wiped their nose, at least in this ...
    1. +11
      April 20 2016 19: 51
      But it annoys me that lately Western analysts have been "licking" our "superiority." An army that does not have a mobilization reserve and a strong rear is doomed to defeat. Do we have it - think for yourself. All of these statements are similar to provocation in the style of "Weak?" hi
      1. +1
        April 20 2016 21: 22
        it’s they so shaking their budget, the future ...
      2. +15
        April 20 2016 21: 53
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        An army that does not have a mobilization reserve and a strong rear is doomed to defeat.


        The incomprehension is complete. Mobile reserve - available, even in the 90s managed to give birth. To the Army - turn, strong rear - wife and daughter. And there are millions like me. Choo, what was the croaking? I smell the smell of liberalism, stinkers ... We even haven’t been broken by such freaks.
        1. +1
          April 21 2016 09: 55
          Quote: iliitch
          Mobile reserve - available, even in the 90s managed to give birth

          Where?!! How many percent of youth served in the army, are you aware? And what can you teach a young boy in a year? Or are you hoping to throw the enemy meat again? An urgent need to return 2 years, and in the Airborne Forces 3!
          Quote: iliitch
          I smell the smell of liberalism, stinky ...

          Maybe you still need to change your underwear? wink
          1. +3
            April 21 2016 17: 25
            He will not answer.
            He is capable of throwing slogans only.
            I know labor collectives in a couple of hundred people, where not one served from 20 to 40 years ...
            Here is a quota.

            And about the warehouses of the mobile reserve, I also saw something. good little. But you can’t.
          2. 0
            April 22 2016 15: 13
            Of course, two years, but on condition that there will be decent motivation.
      3. +2
        April 21 2016 17: 23
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        But it annoys me that lately Western analysts have been "licking" our "superiority." An army that does not have a mobilization reserve and a strong rear is doomed to defeat. Do we have it - think for yourself. All of these statements are similar to provocation in the style of "Weak?" hi


        For this, thank the translators who seek out the slightest news, at least somehow related to news about the RA, and translate them in such a way that it seems to many fools that the State Department and the US Defense Ministry are shaking with fear.

        Attempts to find the source several times and translate it independently indicates that the translators are completely liars.
        Almost always turn the meaning of the article on 180 degrees.
        Some kind of waste of ur-lie is pouring in a stream.
  3. -2
    April 20 2016 18: 47
    They forgot to write about the main character - SU-24 with the "Khibiny" complex, which so beautifully conceived Cook in the Black Sea !!! laughing good
    1. +3
      April 20 2016 20: 01
      Quote: Castor_ka
      They forgot to write about the main character - SU-24 with the Khibiny complex

      On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.
      1. +2
        April 20 2016 20: 19
        On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.

        That's for sure. And they were never put. The planned version of the installation of "Khibin" in a truncated form on the Su-24MK, but further planning did not go.
        And the American destroyer was shocked in the Black Sea when it spotted the irradiation of the Bastion coastal defense complex.
        1. +6
          April 20 2016 21: 10
          Quote: Alexander1959
          On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.

          That's for sure. And they were never put. The planned version of the installation of "Khibin" in a truncated form on the Su-24MK, but further planning did not go.
          And the American destroyer was shocked in the Black Sea when it spotted the irradiation of the Bastion coastal defense complex.


          You know, I also thought so until recently, you can see my comments, but the other day, big people from the big screen affirmatively said that the American still had an electronic effect, and there was no reason not to believe them, it was not necessarily Khibiny, in Russia there are other aviation systems for electronic warfare, Tarantula for example, so that there is no smoke without fire.
          1. 0
            April 20 2016 21: 30
            I also heard from certain sources that the "Lever" was used. Moreover, the helicopter was hanging there relatively close to the scene. But ... I think that the more impressive argument was, after all, the radiation from "Bastion". It is possible that the combination of the effects of various means played a role, including the purely visual effects of the Su-24M flying nearby at a low altitude.
      2. +1
        April 20 2016 21: 48
        Quote: Be proud.
        On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.

        Here is an excerpt from an article in the Russian newspaper: "... The Russian front-line bomber Su-24, which arrived at Donald Cook, had no bombs or missiles on board. One container with the Khibiny electronic warfare system hung under the fuselage. Having approached the destroyer," The Khibiny "turned off its radar, combat control circuits, data transmission systems - in short, turned off the entire Aegis, just as we turn off the TV by pressing a button on the remote control. After that, the Su-24 simulated a missile attack on the blinded and deafened ship. Then another and another - only 12 times ... ".
        Are you saying that this is not true? Those. Did our designers take and "tied with a rope" the Khibiny complex to the Su-24?
        For unbelievers, here is the link: http://rg.ru/2014/04/30/reb-site.html
        1. +4
          April 20 2016 22: 27
          Are you saying that this is not true? Those. Did our designers take and "tied with a rope" the Khibiny complex to the Su-24?
          For unbelievers, here is the link: http://rg.ru/2014/04/30/reb-site.html


          Yes, I argue that this is not true. And for non-believers I bring an article from the same site.http: //topwar.ru/70310-hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-amerikansk
          ogo-esminca-v-chernoe-more.html

          If you are too lazy to read the whole article, read the quote from there.
          It is impossible to “cut down” the enemy’s radar using the Khibin CREAP (this task is not even set), but, acting on a local scale, it is quite possible to turn the “drying” into a “difficult target” by giving the pilots several minutes to complete the task aviation and air defense of the enemy.

          Now about how all this relates to the case of “Donald Cook”. The answer is no way!

          KREP “Khibiny” is not installed on Su-24 aircraft (silent scene). The complex is intended only for the new Su-34 tactical bombers (the mentioned L175V containers, the supply of 92 sets, according to the contract of the Ministry of Defense dated January 14.01.2013, 418). A variant of this station KS-24E for export Su-2MK and MK-2000 did not go into series, the last time it was seen at the booth of the MAKS air show in the mid-XNUMXs


          A fairly real version of what happened is available here.
          http://judgesuhov.livejournal.com/73431.html

          It would seem that on this site this bike about "Khibiny" has long been dismantled.

          But, if there is a desire to consult in more detail what and how it is on the Su-24M, refer to ancientwhen it appears on the site. He flew on all modifications of the Su-24, and he knows this plane thoroughly.

          Well, if this does not convince you, continue to put the cons further.
          1. +1
            April 21 2016 23: 50
            Quote: Alexander1959
            Yes, I affirm that this is not true. And for non-believers I bring an article from the same site. Http://topwar.ru/70310-hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-amerikansk

            ogo-esminca-v-chernoe-more.html

            Have you ever wondered where the professor, doctor of physical and mathematical sciences, Oleg Kaptsov, who should be engaged only in his professional activities, has so much information and photographs on military topics. He should have no time to write so many articles on Military Review. There is only one conclusion. They supply him with information and write articles for him, and he places them under his name. In his articles, truth is mixed with lies.
            By the way, by profession, he wrote the last book in 1999. In 2009, his book was published in which he simply collected all the scientific mathematical experience from around the world (Methods for integrating partial differential equations). There, his mathematical developments are not a single word, the usual plagiarism from other textbooks on higher mathematics.
            1. +1
              April 23 2016 19: 07
              I can distinguish between truth and falsehood in aviation matters. At one time, I served in the 1st Flight Testing Directorate of 929 GLITS of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (formerly 8 GNIKI Air Force named after V.P. Chkalov) in the flight test department of attack and front-line bomber aviation as a leading test engineer. I remained with aviation knowledge and old connections. And, the tests of the Su-24, just engaged in our department. Now the late head of the department, retired colonel Viktor Georgievich Eliseev just received the title of Laureate of the State Prize for State Trials of the Su-24. I was engaged in attack aircraft .... but, I knew the features of the equipment that my comrades were engaged in.
              1. 0
                April 25 2016 23: 17
                Quote: Alexander1959
                And, our department was engaged in the tests of Su-24.

                We are talking about 2015, and the Su-24 was tested in the 70s. I also once worked at a defense enterprise and was a member of all workshops and departments. And there were no secrets from me either, because I then had the highest tolerance for everything. But what was being done then in the 70s is so outdated (although many Americans or Japanese never dreamed of electronics) that it can be compared with our time and new developments that can be hung on any old objects, not to mention new objects , you just can't. Why can't the old Su-24s have the Khibiny system or something else? Is it really impossible to do this? Don't tell stories.
        2. +1
          April 20 2016 23: 14
          PS The minus is not mine. I do not have the habit of putting cons. Minus the person for an opinion different from mine ... somehow not in Feng Shui. And then it can happen. what I wrote crap, and the opponent correctly stated everything. wassat
        3. +2
          April 21 2016 00: 05
          Quote: Алексей_К
          Are you saying that this is not true? Those. Did our designers take and "tied with a rope" the Khibiny complex to the Su-24?

          Without disputing the essence of the dispute and the competence of our designers, I dare to note that our journalists can "tie with their language" anything and to anything, especially with the possible observance of the secrecy regime.
          1. 0
            April 21 2016 10: 40
            Without disputing the essence of the dispute and the competence of our designers, I dare to note that our journalists can "tie with language" anything and to anything, especially with the possible observance of the secrecy regime

            I believe that the incompetence of journalists, including military journalists, played a large role in this hype. If you pay attention to messages on military topics, in particular on aviation, the names of aircraft are often confused. For example, instead of the Su-34, they write Su-24, instead of the Su-25 attack aircraft, they write the Su-25 fighter ... well, etc. etc. As for the "Khibiny" and the American destroyer, I do not exclude a special injection of false information, which was picked up, as the user likes to say ancient
            , "media flyers"
            ... Well, and, accordingly, picked up a number of non-competent Internet users in this topic. It is possible that this was the purpose in order to divert attention from something. And what about the fact that "Donald Cook" was frightened by the radiation of "Bastion". I recently mentioned in an interview one Deputy Minister of Defense. I hope it is difficult to accuse him of incompetence.
          2. +1
            April 21 2016 22: 39
            Quote: AID.S
            Without disputing the essence of the dispute and the competence of our designers, I dare to note that our journalists can "tie with their language" anything and to anything, especially with the possible observance of the secrecy regime.

            Where do you get the information from? Is it not from people who consider themselves journalists? If you had information from special services, then on any site you could not write a single word, because You would have already been kicked out of this structure and would have sat for treason. Well, the Khibiny EW are mounted on the wings, which means the Khibiny were designed under the Su-24, regardless of modification.
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. +1
              April 23 2016 13: 07
              Layout Su-24М with container KS-418Е
      3. -1
        April 20 2016 22: 31
        Quote from the newspaper TV Star:
        “During these trainings, the pilots should also work out methods of electronic suppression of the enemy at the Telemba training ground. the latest Khibiny electronic warfare system installed on the Su-24... On the ground, the pilots are supported by the Aerospace Defense Forces. "



        "http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201404141119-gx7a.htm"
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          April 20 2016 23: 06
          Tests of the L175V container of the Khibiny-10V complex began in January 1995. The second stage of testing began on the Su-34 in Ramenskoye in August 1997. But only on March 18, 2014, the L175V complex was adopted as part of the Su-34 aircraft armament for the Air Force Russia.
          In addition to the L175V, other versions of the Khibiny complex were created, but none of them was brought to use in the Russian Air Force. Consequently, this complex could not be placed on the Su-24, and in the material of the Zvezda TV channel, which the author of the sensational pseudo-scientific opus refers to, defense journalists simply confused the Su-34 with the Su-24 (it says that in the recent maneuvers of the Khibiny were practiced with the Su-24, while in fact the development was carried out with the Su-34 and all normal ordinary media wrote about it).

          http://red-military.livejournal.com/228126.html
          1. 0
            April 21 2016 23: 27
            Quote: Alexander1959
            Tests of the L175V container of the Khibiny-10V complex began in January 1995. The second stage of testing began on the Su-34 in Ramenskoye in August 1997. But only on March 18, 2014, the L175V complex was adopted as part of the Su-34 aircraft armament for the Air Force Russia.
            In addition to the L175V, other versions of the Khibiny complex were created, but none of them was brought to use in the Russian Air Force. Consequently, this complex could not be placed on the Su-24, and in the material of the Zvezda TV channel, which the author of the sensational pseudo-scientific opus refers to, defense journalists simply confused the Su-34 with the Su-24 (it says that in the recent maneuvers of the Khibiny were practiced with the Su-24, while in fact the development was carried out with the Su-34 and all normal ordinary media wrote about it).

            http://red-military.livejournal.com/228126.html

            You believe some kind of Internet magazine and do not believe the official publication "Television and Radio Company Zvezda". You do not believe "Rossiyskaya Gazeta" (the official publication of Russia) and believe the false journalist Oleg Kaptsov. And he is not a journalist. He is a doctor of physical and mathematical sciences. Apparently his professional activity ceased to satisfy his scientific leaders, so he began to write on the Military Review. Other publications do not accept his half-truth. Read carefully the opinions of VO readers on his articles and you will understand who he really is. He mixes true information with outright lies to be believed.
        3. 0
          April 23 2016 13: 16
          Layout Su-24М with container KS-418Е
          https://www.google.ru/search?q=%D1%80%D1%8D%D0%B1+%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD
          %D1%8B+%D1%81%D1%83-24&newwindow=1&hl=ru&biw=1366&bih=657&site=webhp&source=lnms
          &tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi41O6owKTMAhVBOpoKHSd4CEYQ_AUIBygC#tbm=isch&tbs=rimg%3
          ACZPdeV48cSaWIjjpGZI7TGgpZ3UtSA16OLM21ooWRjg3jNi12nCOaM767HkNL-WZxZVwHvxuYCmoRg5
          tIpxia18KlyoSCekZkjtMaClnEZm79Jm6XEr4KhIJdS1IDXo4szYRJ3FsE5DlNtoqEgnWihZGODeM2BF
          4Sm7S4dFHwyoSCbXacI5ozvrsEXhKbtLh0UfDKhIJeQ0v5ZnFlXARRYEevA_11_18wqEgke_1G5gKahG
          DhFYCFR1yG7EoioSCW0inGJrXwqXEdK1yOGk0vLQ&q=%D1%80%D1%8D%D0%B1%20%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%
          B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B%20%D1%81%D1%83-24&hl=ru&imgrc=k915XjxxJpbxZM%3A
  4. -1
    April 20 2016 19: 03
    This is a hint to give money to a super scout!
  5. +4
    April 20 2016 19: 04
    were overly focused on counterinsurgency operations

    Eka Patterson wisely twisted. belay No one would say simpler - on the organization of coups. feel
  6. +1
    April 20 2016 19: 12
    All these are comrade officers, our eyes and ears .. wink Joyfully for our IL-20 (IL-18 for infancy), mass-produced until the year 1978, and is still in service. What is this margin of safety and potential in it ?! soldier
    1. +9
      April 20 2016 19: 21
      Quote: Zubr
      Joyfully for our IL-20 (IL-18 for infancy), mass-produced until the year 1078,

      Colleague, you were a little mistaken, in the 1078 year there were still no planes flying, most likely before the 1978 year, you wanted to say. hi
  7. +1
    April 20 2016 19: 16
    Squealing, then I don’t like it. I wish I could bring the A-100 to mind, but let it go into series ...
  8. +8
    April 20 2016 19: 26
    As stated earlier by the Deputy Head of the Cyber ​​Command of the US Armed Forces, Ronald Pontius ...


    Cyber ​​Command! Oh how! And you keep saying: "Couch troops, sofa troops." Yes, they even have their own commander in Omereg!
  9. +5
    April 20 2016 19: 27
    Gossspodi, what is the pace of development ?! They don’t have time to give debts. Yes, and how not to get confused, they borrowed from the Saudis, in order to pay the Saudis to bang the Twin Towers, which allowed them (the Americans) to take a loan from the Saudis, to fuck Iraq and borrow money from the Saudis for fuel and air force of the European Air Force that provided no-fly zone over Libya.
  10. +2
    April 20 2016 19: 37
    You see, they are not keeping pace with the development of Russian intelligence aircraft! Judging by the development inherited from the USSR, we never had time! And with what fright should they keep up now? Let the lip-filling machine be upgraded, otherwise it certainly does not have time to roll up mattress lip-slaps!
  11. -2
    April 20 2016 19: 51
    I think the author of the article does not know that the USA has long been armed with devices such as the RC-135 and TR-1A
    1. +1
      April 20 2016 22: 07
      RC-135 is the same age as the Soviet A-50 your cap laughing
      1. 0
        April 21 2016 17: 29
        Quote: niki233
        RC-135 is the same age as the Soviet A-50 your cap laughing


        Latest "W" modifications - from what year? there is all the filling from scratch, however ...

        And how many modifications were on the a-50?
        Two?
        The second of them is the future A-100?
  12. 0
    April 20 2016 19: 56
    "Russian reconnaissance aircraft pose a threat to America, Washington is not keeping pace with their pace of development"

    It covered the laurel wreath of the "winner of the Cold War" all eyes, covered all paths to the future.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +1
    April 20 2016 20: 07
    Quote: 79807420129
    Quote: Zubr
    Joyfully for our IL-20 (IL-18 for infancy), mass-produced until the year 1078,

    Colleague, you were a little mistaken, in the 1078 year there were still no planes flying, most likely before the 1978 year, you wanted to say. hi


    Yes, I made a mistake .. smile I pressed the wrong button .. smile But already corrected .. hi
  15. +2
    April 20 2016 20: 11
    Quote: old pioneer
    Gossspodi, what is the pace of development ?! They don’t have time to give debts. Yes, and how not to get confused, they borrowed from the Saudis, in order to pay the Saudis to bang the Twin Towers, which allowed them (the Americans) to take a loan from the Saudis, to fuck Iraq and borrow money from the Saudis for fuel and air force of the European Air Force that provided no-fly zone over Libya.


    Here it is bent .. laughing good
  16. +1
    April 20 2016 22: 06
    Quote: The same Lech
    all think of war ...
    with RUSSIA ... fools ...
    the last thing that will be remembered in the USA before the start of the apocalypse is the red button in the hands of HILLARY CLINTON ...
    unless of course she becomes the last president of the United States.
    The Tu-214P looks futuristic because of the side radars ... beautifully, but how does this affect the airworthiness of the airframe?

    But almost nothing. The shape is streamlined overhangs are licked. Well, cruising speed will fall by a few km / h, so it's about nothing
    1. 0
      April 22 2016 23: 08
      look at the cruciform vibrators (which are located at the tail). Where is the streamlined shape and the licked tabs?
  17. 0
    April 20 2016 22: 44
    Quote: Michael67
    I really want this state of affairs to be included in the system.
    And in all sectors.

    +1
  18. +1
    April 20 2016 22: 45
    Quote: Altona
    And about "praise us" is the usual whine about money

    100%
  19. 0
    April 20 2016 22: 57
    IL-20 can be used for radio interception and scanning of the enemy’s radio air, which makes it possible to determine the concentration of the opponent’s forces, ”the author notes.

    Wow! "Opponent" ... Here he cajoled. Come on, why are there partners! laughing
  20. -1
    April 20 2016 23: 00
    Quote: Manul
    IL-20 can be used for radio interception and scanning of the enemy’s radio air, which makes it possible to determine the concentration of the opponent’s forces, ”the author notes.

    Wow! "Opponent" ... Here he cajoled. Come on, why are there partners! laughing

    I’ll insert the word .. in any case - the enemy, whatever you call ..
  21. -1
    April 20 2016 23: 10
    "As a result, America forgot about the development of its own electronic warfare ..."

    EW is actually an interesting thing: it is one year behind, it is forever behind! And the school can now turn inside out, but they reached the level of the USSR of the 80s of the last century in this area in the best scenario some 30 years later, and guaranteed by 2070.
  22. +1
    April 20 2016 23: 30
    Quote: Michael67
    I really want this state of affairs to be included in the system.
    And in all sectors.

    In the near future, I would like to see long-range strike drones and new AWACS aircraft.
  23. 0
    April 21 2016 00: 20
    Patterson, in vain you started a confrontation with Russia, in vain. After all, we will always be ahead now, no matter what it is worth in vain praising our electronic warfare. Now Russia will no longer be so trusting and good-natured, and if necessary, we will pile on anywhere.
  24. bad
    +2
    April 21 2016 06: 05
    Quote: The same Lech
    all think of war ...
    with RUSSIA ... fools ...
    the last thing that will be remembered in the USA before the start of the apocalypse is the red button in the hands of HILLARY CLINTON ...
    unless of course she becomes the last president of the United States.
    The Tu-214P looks futuristic because of the side radars ... beautifully, but how does this affect the airworthiness of the airframe?
    heh .. but this is not a fighter .. laughing it's an all-seeing eye .. and a big ear .. laughing ..imho .. such a complex is probably reliably protected .. too expensive to lose it .. or am I wrong? recourse
  25. +1
    April 21 2016 06: 35
    Quote: Denis Obukhov
    Everywhere they have threats, dangers, they are afraid of everything. What kind of sykuns are you ...

    In order to be afraid, you must at least have a stronger opponent (if you want, an enemy), if he is not there, you need to invent or suck the threat out of your finger. What the States are doing, putting on their ears the whole of Europe. The business of the military lobby and the political ambitions of the government come first, and fear is bought for the money of the population.
  26. 0
    April 21 2016 07: 13
    something too often, we began to praise our army. strange is all.
    1. 0
      April 21 2016 22: 10
      If the articles were correctly translated and not supplemented by fiction, then there was nothing to talk about ..
  27. +1
    April 21 2016 07: 17
    Yes, the usual recent way to kick money out of the budget. After all, as it was before, the military thought what they needed, drew up a document for the government, they considered it with a proposal to Congress and the president, well, etc. And now we saw a new piece of metal and in a cry - a guard, they are killing, give money, otherwise there is nothing to buy a third car for. Well, the province went to write, without any analysis, without consideration by smart people, and to hell with it, if there is an opportunity to grab it under the guise. This is how budget funds are mastered, for as many as 500 million US tugriks they trained as many as 5 people. What is not a business?
  28. 0
    April 21 2016 11: 46
    spit on omega, the main thing is that we have a new and promising army
  29. +1
    April 21 2016 14: 06
    Yeah, it came true, caught up and surpassed ... Now you can relax and lie on the lavrushki like that.
    Just don't relax too much, some of this kind of statements like "everything is lost" and "Russia got us" are made especially for those who like it.
  30. 0
    April 21 2016 18: 53
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    but how does this affect the airworthiness of the airframe?

    It seems that once flies, it is not very critical! )))
  31. 0
    April 21 2016 22: 35
    "As the deputy head of the US Cyber ​​Command, Ronald Pontius, said earlier," Russian reconnaissance aircraft pose a threat to America, Washington is not keeping up with the pace of their development. " And where did you get the idea that the words spoken by this American are true in the flesh? Since when do you believe them? Maybe they were telling the truth about the "torn to shreds economy"?
  32. 0
    April 22 2016 01: 44
    Nothing to add ...
  33. 0
    April 22 2016 02: 47
    Parasites want to cut more money from the budget
  34. 0
    April 22 2016 22: 41
    Against the background of our developments, our "partners" have something to think about.
  35. 0
    April 23 2016 16: 10
    Moldavians are Russian. Now the war is electronics and stomp bombs ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"