Military Review

Islamists knocked out Turkish tank from “Cornet” (video)

99
Islamists published a video on the network depicting the Turkish attack tank in Iraq from the Kornet ATGM.




Judging by the description, the event occurred north of Mosul, located near the Turkish border and under the control of the IG.

“The Turkish tank M-60 is on high ground when a missile fired from a Russian-made Kornet hits it. The fate of the crew and the nature of the damage to the tank are unknown, "- comments the video newspaper Look.



As the newspaper notes, the “Kornet” anti-tank complex was adopted by the Russian army in 1998, after which it was supplied, in particular, to Syria and Turkey; firing range - 100 – 5500 meters, armor penetration - 1200-1300 mm behind dynamic protection. ”
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/
99 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg April 20 2016 08: 58
    +47
    It is not excluded that the Turks themselves supplied the Islamists with the Kornet anti-tank complex. It would be appropriate: "Don't dig a hole for another."
    1. Error
      Error April 20 2016 09: 00
      -33%
      The M60 had no chance whatsoever in the crew! Well, if now the IS is going to bambit the Turks with cornet, I won’t be surprised that this is our answer to the downed plane !!! If this is so oh and I do not envy Turkey
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. guzik007
          guzik007 April 20 2016 09: 14
          +23
          What else is interesting from where the Iraq m60? I read and watched how many spawn M60 was not there, then again a mulka.
          --------------------------------------
          Read carefully-In Iraq does not mean Iraqi. There, the Turks allegedly fight with igil. Interestingly another, why is it igilovtsy wet their patrons. Shores beguiled?
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. aktanir
            aktanir April 20 2016 09: 58
            +4
            The warhead of the ptrk needs to be increased so that from the tanks only scrap for the reciever remains
            1. Petergut
              Petergut April 20 2016 16: 46
              +2
              A moot point. An increase in warhead mass is an increase in the dimensions and mass of the entire complex. Still, the complex is portable, and carrying 40 kege instead of 30 is two big differences, as they say in one port town.
              Well, judging by the video, the power of the charge is sufficient, the tanchik has already decently decayed.
              It is clear that I would like to zhahnut so that "to shreds", but in military design bureaus, too, not stupid people sit.
              As the saying goes, "the best is the enemy of the good."
          3. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky April 20 2016 10: 40
            +13
            Quote: guzik007
            .It is interesting another why the Ishilovites are wetting their patrons. Shores beguiled?

            They create the background for the formation of informational justification for the motivation of the Turkish full-scale invasion of the territory of a neighboring state.
            Previously, they presented their invasion as helping the Kurdish militia in pain with the Daesh, but after they began to bomb the Kurds, this version does not roll.
            In short, the bearded have fulfilled the order. All subsequent movement will be directed against the Kurds.
            1. Petergut
              Petergut April 20 2016 16: 55
              +1
              The same thoughts, comrade. Very similar to a provocation to justify the entry of the Ottomans into Iraq.
          4. Fregate
            Fregate April 20 2016 11: 44
            +4
            Quote: guzik007
            Another thing is interesting, why are Igilovites wet their patrons. Shores beguiled?

            I can assume that it was not ISIS, but the Turks themselves. As the article says, we supplied both Syria and Turkey with the Cornet. And pay attention, I personally have never seen ISIS members "smear" their faces on footage, but here it is overwritten, for what? Maybe no one would recognize the Turk in this man? And so it turns out that ISIS allegedly knocked out a Turkish tank, and even from a Russian ATGM.
            1. Ramzaj99
              Ramzaj99 April 20 2016 12: 23
              0
              Quote: Fregate
              Another thing is interesting, why are Igilovites wet their patrons. Shores beguiled?
              I can assume that this was not ISIS, but the Turks themselves.

              And if we assume that they were Kurds, then a lot falls into place .......
              1. Stavros
                Stavros April 20 2016 13: 09
                +3
                It is unlikely that the Kurds, at least have not yet seen in any video that they shouted to Allahu Akbar and so squealed.
          5. ARES623
            ARES623 April 20 2016 13: 07
            0
            Quote: guzik007
            Another thing is interesting, why are Igilovites wet their patrons. Shores beguiled?

            The IG with An-Nusra also do not particularly kiss. There was a time when Baghdadi sent a special team to eliminate the leaders of An-Nusra. So there is nothing surprising.
          6. Black Colonel
            Black Colonel April 20 2016 14: 17
            0
            Dear, did you read the title of the article and the credits on the video? It says in Russian (in the title) and in English (in the credits) that the tank is Turkish.
          7. smershxnumx
            smershxnumx April 20 2016 16: 24
            0
            The video was shot from different (very distant from each other) points ... I am tormented by vague doubts ... Although ... Everything can be ... winked
      2. gray smeet
        gray smeet April 20 2016 09: 22
        +27
        Quote: Error
        Well, if now IG will bambit the Turks I won’t be surprised that it’s our answer to the downed plane !!! If this is so oh and I do not envy Turkey


        You think you write ... fool Link Russia to ISIS? No words, and most importantly, how many people agreed with this, judging by the pluses! fool
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. alean245
            alean245 April 20 2016 10: 41
            +4
            I heard such an expression in the war all means are good

            He who sows the wind will reap the storm.
            PS As I understand it, have you heard anything about spelling and punctuation?
            1. lelikas
              lelikas April 20 2016 10: 48
              +2
              Quote: alean245
              PS As I understand it, have you heard anything about spelling and punctuation?

              In their class, it has not yet passed! wink
        2. ver_
          ver_ April 20 2016 10: 44
          0
          ... and this is exactly ISIS? They are all of the same suit and the language is the same and all shout to Allah! .. joyfully ..
        3. HMR333
          HMR333 April 20 2016 14: 32
          0
          Well, judging by the fact that he wrote there is nothing to think!
      3. fox21h
        fox21h April 20 2016 09: 35
        +6
        Quote: Error
        The M60 had no chance whatsoever in the crew! Well, if now the IS is going to bambit the Turks with cornet, I won’t be surprised that this is our answer to the downed plane !!! If this is so oh and I do not envy Turkey

        Erdogan plays dirty, arranges terrorist attacks, which then accuses the Kurds, and here is a clear provocation and an attempt to dissociate itself from the Daishovites. With what fright they will attack the Turks, who actively support them, if not for provocation and on their orders.
        1. Forest
          Forest April 20 2016 10: 26
          0
          The ISIS Turks did not just support it - they traded in oil, but flirted with all kinds of Jeyh-al-Islam, Ahrar-al-Sham, etc. (if messed up in the names - correct).
      4. Now we are free
        Now we are free April 20 2016 09: 58
        +3
        Mdaaa this is not a T-90 against TOW ... The turmoil from the Turkish tank (it seems the next modification of the M-60) was scattered so that the excuses like the Turkish crew were just not shell-shocked. Whether Erdogan will still be in a campaign, he decided to fight against everyone on this planet and not only against neighbors wassat
        1. edeligor
          edeligor April 20 2016 10: 19
          0
          Quote: Now we are free
          Mistakes from the Turkish tank

          That is not from the tank, then the 200th, the video shows two ... most likely they were either on the armor, or the attendants ... "Who is the war, who is the mother ..."
        2. Suhov
          Suhov April 20 2016 10: 25
          0
          Quote: Now we are free
          Whether there will still be Erdogan decided to fight a campaign already against everyone on this planet not just against neighbors

          I wonder if Martians appear on planet Earth, he will declare war on them too?
        3. ermak.sidorov
          ermak.sidorov April 20 2016 10: 50
          0
          If this is a window dress, then the tank could have been without a crew and generally not working ... but it was large-scaled!
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. ARS56
        ARS56 April 20 2016 10: 19
        +1
        With the same success, the United States will beat England for a passenger plane shot down in Egypt.
      7. loki565
        loki565 April 20 2016 11: 46
        0
        Not a fact, American tanks were famous for their strong forehead of the tower.
        1. zennon
          zennon April 20 2016 16: 02
          0
          Quote: loki565
          Not a fact, American tanks were famous for their strong forehead of the tower.

          Yes to health. Let them be famous. Only the "Cornet" has a tandem warhead. Armor penetration-1200 mm homogeneous armor. So do not hesitate ...
      8. Velizariy
        Velizariy April 20 2016 12: 24
        +1
        The M60 had no chance whatsoever in the crew! Well, if now the IS is going to bambit the Turks with cornet, I won’t be surprised that this is our answer to the downed plane !!! If this is so oh and I do not envy Turkey
        Why not at school?
      9. rubidiy
        rubidiy April 20 2016 16: 14
        0
        turkish tank. Here is a photo of the damage. Although, penetration in the photo on the right, and in the video on the left. request

    2. vkl.47
      vkl.47 April 20 2016 09: 15
      +1
      I already see how the State Department hangs about the fact that we are supplying the igil with cornets
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 April 20 2016 09: 19
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      It is not excluded that the Turks themselves supplied the Islamists with the Kornet anti-tank complex. It would be appropriate: "Don't dig a hole for another."

      It will be difficult for Erdogan to explain to his subjects (especially the military) why they should continue to help the IS. Somehow he’s not at all lucky, and / dota ..
    4. SSR
      SSR April 20 2016 09: 20
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      It is not excluded that the Turks themselves supplied the Islamists with the Kornet anti-tank complex. It would be appropriate: "Don't dig a hole for another."

      It will be appropriate when the delivered MANPADS to the baboons in Syria will turn against the suppliers themselves and in Iraq the baboons seized whole arsenals.
      PS

      The Babahs began to cover the faces of the ATGM operators, to see the seizure of operators in Syria opened their eyes to many things.
      1. Sashka
        Sashka April 20 2016 09: 41
        +7
        Or everything is much simpler here ...
        The Turk (therefore hide his face) shoots at an empty tank in Turkey, all this is filmed on camera, then broadcast in various media. So much for the excuse that they are fighting with them too, they are shelling us, what are the connections with ISIS, what are you?!?!?
        And the "Cornet", by chance, did not come from Independence Square ?!
        Good day to all!
        1. tracker
          tracker April 20 2016 10: 40
          +1
          I agree, most likely a throw-in, and the Turks themselves fired
          which are full in the IS, and the tank is specially and empty
    5. Sly
      Sly April 20 2016 09: 33
      0
      it seemed to me, or is there a tanker tumbling in flight?
    6. GSH-18
      GSH-18 April 20 2016 09: 42
      +1
      Islamists knocked out Turkish tank from “Cornet” (video)

      Kondrat ("Cornet") crept up to the Turkish tank
      Turkish tank meeting was not very happy! lol
    7. GSH-18
      GSH-18 April 20 2016 09: 45
      0
      I watched the video ...
      Yes! This is powerful! Not like some frail Javelin.
      As much as a slip on the side of the tank flew, the barrel blew off, 50 meters flew off! In the course of the khan’s crew. request
      1. Aroma77
        Aroma77 April 20 2016 10: 13
        0
        Dulo, Dear, just left in place.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. GSH-18
          GSH-18 April 20 2016 10: 48
          0
          Quote: Aroma77
          Dulo, Dear, just left in place.

          And the tank flew away lol
          As old Einstein said, Everything is relative! lol
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 April 20 2016 11: 00
        +1
        The Turkish tank had no chance.
        THE MAIN TACTICAL AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE KORNET ATKM

        Shooting range, m:
        in the afternoon - 100-5500
        at night - 100-3500

        Control system:
        - semi-automatic
        - by laser beam

        Warhead:
        - tandem cumulative
        - thermobaric

        Time lag between undermines
        preliminary and main charge, ms - 300
        Penetration, mm - 1000
        Rocket caliber, mm - 152

        Weight, kg:
        launcher - 19
        rocket container - 27

        http://topwar.ru/4255-kornet-protiv-generala-abramsa.html
    8. Blondy
      Blondy April 20 2016 10: 00
      +4
      What a muddy video. Two different footage - on one they shoot from the cornet, and on the other something gets into the tank. A single comment is molded to everything.
      1. GSH-18
        GSH-18 April 20 2016 10: 45
        -2
        Quote: Blondy
        What a muddy video. Two different footage - on one they shoot from the cornet, and on the other something gets into the tank. A single comment is molded to everything.

        There is nothing strange here.
        A camera lens directed from a position towards the tank unmasks the location of the calculation.
        The second camera with a powerful lens was placed at a distance from the target and calmly shot the moment of destruction.
    9. Bobxnumx
      Bobxnumx April 20 2016 10: 18
      +1
      The tank seems to have swept away.
      1. GSH-18
        GSH-18 April 20 2016 10: 45
        0
        Quote: Bob0859
        The tank seems to have swept away.

        In the trash!
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 April 20 2016 11: 18
          +1

          Against such a missile, 152mm, a tandam warhead, 1000mm armor penetration, it is unlikely that any tank can withstand it.
    10. shark913
      shark913 April 20 2016 13: 06
      0
      Most likely the Saudis put the Cornet, we supply them on contracts!
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 April 20 2016 13: 59
        0
        These ATGMs were taken from the Syrian army depots - all the same, Russia delivered Syria to more than 1000 Cornets.
    11. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. DIMA45R
    DIMA45R April 20 2016 08: 59
    +2
    So the Turks will learn the "efficiency" of outdated American tanks.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 20 2016 09: 54
      -4
      The M-60, like the T-72, has all the hope for the operation of the DZ.
      The main armor of both is weak.
      1. kirieeleyson
        kirieeleyson April 20 2016 10: 39
        +6
        Which T-72, can you specify? The fact is that I wouldn't even put a second Merkava on one "shelf" with the M-60, well, maybe the time of the first release. Against the "Cornet" and Abrams' armor is weak))
        1. Forest
          Forest April 20 2016 11: 56
          0
          Abrams has up to 1500-1600 mm reduced armor in the forehead of the tower against the COP, more than 1000 in the forehead of the hull. A small twist - and it is unlikely to break through.
          1. kirieeleyson
            kirieeleyson April 21 2016 13: 21
            0
            This is what a daredevil should be a fighter who puts up an ATGM and puts Abramsu directly from his forehead.
            There is no way to do it like everywhere else - to crawl out along the ground, find a firing point, escape route, set a cornet, do business with huge goosebumps from the neck to the tailbone and quickly get out of there.
        2. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 20 2016 12: 23
          +2
          Merkava-4 is relatively well protected from the sides, from above, from behind.
          But Merkava’s forehead is not very, like the T-72’s,
          The only well-protected forehead is uranium, namely Abrams.
          1. GSH-18
            GSH-18 April 20 2016 12: 32
            0
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Merkava-4 is relatively well protected from the sides, from above, from behind.
            But Merkava’s forehead is not very, like the T-72’s,
            The only well-protected forehead is uranium, namely Abrams.

            This is normal for Merkava. Russian and American tanks have a different application philosophy - frontal projections should be strongly booked in the first place. On Merkava, due to the specifics of the application, a solid reservation almost the same everywhere was applied.
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The only well-protected forehead is uranium, namely Abrams.

            He is not the only one. Protection with a layer of uranium carbide is an old, proven method, but now it is far from the only and not the best! (Not to mention the fact that the crew all the time catches the residual radiation, like the pilots of our fighters in Soviet times, when the illumination of all devices was made from a mixture of phosphor + radioactive substance). Now, naturally on LEDs, everything has been replaced everywhere for a long time! good
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 April 20 2016 14: 01
            -1
            Merkava 4 has KAZ Trophy - there is nothing that can’t break even reach.
          3. MACCABI-TLV
            MACCABI-TLV April 20 2016 21: 04
            0
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Merkava-4 is relatively well protected from the sides, from above, from behind.
            But Merkava’s forehead is not very, like the T-72’s,

            that is, when the merkava enters the emdat ery (firing position). Does it become toward the enemy side and stern? smile
  4. Mechanocleap
    Mechanocleap April 20 2016 09: 00
    +4
    How many times did he say allahu akbar, I thought at first so intentionally mixed wassat
  5. Aleksander
    Aleksander April 20 2016 09: 04
    +5
    They beat their own! They probably have a fundamental disagreement, the heads of the wrong cut from right to left or left to right ....
  6. Vasili09
    Vasili09 April 20 2016 09: 04
    -3
    asks how he got there, this very "cornet"
    Incidentally, the ammunition was not detonated with, although the development of 60 years, probably the warhead was a high-explosive
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 20 2016 09: 08
      +1
      Quote: Vasily09
      asks how he got there, this very "cornet"
      Incidentally, the ammunition was not detonated with, although the development of 60 years, probably the warhead was a high-explosive

      Do you really believe that there is a barrel and shells of the 60s? Such things are being modernized on any tank, EMNIP.
    2. kapitan92
      kapitan92 April 20 2016 09: 25
      +6
      Quote: Vasily09
      asks how he got there, this very "cornet"
      Incidentally, the ammunition was not detonated with, although the development of 60 years, probably the warhead was a high-explosive

      Was there ammunition and crew there ??? That is the question. Everything is smooth and beautiful: a tank is like a target, falling into a lateral projection is like in textbooks.
      A well-organized provocation, which makes it possible to increase the Turkish contingent in Iraq.
  7. PPD
    PPD April 20 2016 09: 05
    +3
    But did the Turks think that the animal grown and maintained by them would not bite them?
  8. Romanenko
    Romanenko April 20 2016 09: 06
    0
    Once again reminded - a weapon, a double-edged thing, when who and to whom put these Cornets? As a result, they work today with the Islamists for Turkish tanks, and tomorrow ...
    Money smells and smells very strong.
  9. domokl
    domokl April 20 2016 09: 06
    0
    For Cornet, the M-60 is nothing more than scrap metal ... There’s no point even comparing .. The Turks with ground forces are far from a modern army
  10. kill the fascist
    kill the fascist April 20 2016 09: 07
    0
    judging by the explosion of a turkish tank in flaps. I wonder if there is a video of combat use and hits of Jewish spikes?
  11. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P April 20 2016 09: 07
    0
    I got into the parapet during the course .. but there wasn’t a tank in the tank ..
  12. askof
    April 20 2016 09: 07
    0
    Why are they so with sponsors?
  13. wandlitz
    wandlitz April 20 2016 09: 08
    0
    It’s impossible to tame a mad dog ...
  14. Flinky
    Flinky April 20 2016 09: 09
    0
    M60 is an antique thing, any one can cope with it and a BMP box, not like Cornet.
  15. demo
    demo April 20 2016 09: 18
    0
    The fate of the crew, and the machine itself is the same - to the scrap.
    Rushed nobly.
  16. Engineer
    Engineer April 20 2016 09: 24
    +1
    We are waiting for a video report of the work of Cornet in Altai
  17. Santa bear
    Santa bear April 20 2016 09: 29
    +4
    Let's be objective. The Turkish mm60 is the most massive tank in the Turkish army at the moment and it is still significantly modernized, and in my opinion, with the help of Israeli officialists, the cars compared to the original. Of course, you cannot compare it with the latest MBT models, but the armor, protection systems, suo, etc. are seriously improved there. Cornet is such a goal more than in the teeth of course .. but these tanks are not called rubbish either.
  18. Lankaster
    Lankaster April 20 2016 09: 35
    +3
    Here he is after hitting. This is, like, an Israeli modification of the M60T Sabra
  19. donavi49
    donavi49 April 20 2016 09: 37
    +2
    This tank, after hitting it, is the most advanced M-60 - Sabra with Israeli DZ.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 April 20 2016 09: 50
      0
      If this is really him, then the fate of the crew can not be interested. Judging by the photographs, it’s only been standing in a trench for a long time, which, by Iraqi standards, has a lot of water.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 20 2016 09: 58
      0
      In Israel, DZ are skeptical, although they are used to
      gain all kinds of armored personnel carriers. Efficiency after triggering is very
      unpredictable - a little on the side, a little on the edge - and does not help ... 50/50 ...
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 20 2016 10: 19
      +1
      Most likely there was no crew at the time of the hit.
    4. Leto
      Leto April 20 2016 10: 25
      +1
      Quote: donavi49
      This tank, after hitting it, is the most advanced M-60 - Sabra with Israeli DZ.

      In the video, the tank stood on top of a hill, and then vice versa in some kind of pit ... with water ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. K-50
        K-50 April 20 2016 11: 12
        +2
        Quote: Leto
        In the video, the tank stood on top of a hill, and then vice versa in some kind of pit ... with water ..

        You just read it carefully. In the photo is an Israeli M-60, and in the video is Turkish, in Iraq. hi
      3. Demontek
        Demontek April 20 2016 11: 18
        +1
        And on the video, the approach and hit of the bird was on the right side, and here the hole on the left. Something doesn't fit anything.
    5. RPG_
      RPG_ April 20 2016 12: 48
      0
      You have the Centurion in the photo, not the M60, it has a different building, not to mention the tower.
      1. igor67
        igor67 April 20 2016 13: 08
        0
        Quote: RPG_
        You have the Centurion in the photo, not the M60, it has a different building, not to mention the tower.

        Here is the centurion, and in the picture is m60,
  20. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher April 20 2016 09: 52
    +1
    And there now go figure out who was shooting, ISIS, not ISIS, Kurds, not Kurds ... "Cornets" went from hand to hand, they will distribute less, to whom, without hitting ... yes
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 20 2016 09: 58
      +5
      This is 100% Caliphate, shot by their studio - on the emblem in the upper right.

      The Cornets in Iraq went hand in hand with the 2014 of the year when they took warehouses in Nineiva with hundreds of ATGMs of this type, and then in Salah Ah-Din.
  21. pigkiller
    pigkiller April 20 2016 09: 55
    0
    According to the Pentagon, from 2003 to 2015. US trained 900 thousand Iraqi soldiers and police!
    According to Al-Jazeera, only in January 2015, 2 Iraqi divisions along with arms and supply depots switched to ISIL.
  22. Pate
    Pate April 20 2016 10: 01
    0
    To make a Turkish tank sound strange, because as you know, Turkey supports terrorists from ISIS and Jeb-Hat An-Nusra, so why should they destroy the tank of their ally.
  23. Arkan
    Arkan April 20 2016 10: 02
    -1
    M-60 old bucket for ATGM "Kornet", after it hits, the tank becomes a mass grave for the crew.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 20 2016 14: 05
      -2
      Not at all - in Yemen, in the M60, Husits ​​directly to the side of the tower from Cornet - Iranian production, fell, the crew survived, but they were all shell-shocked.
  24. Old
    Old April 20 2016 10: 16
    +5
    Yes, the Turks themselves and blinded this movie. The tank is plywood, rolled out onto a slide, set sideways. Camera on a tripod in a convenient location. Day, the sun. Russian complex. The barmaley’s face was covered up. Handed over to the brothers, and they laid out on their own behalf. Bearded glory and honor. And the Turks are now fighters with ISIS. And the Russians -, they scatter Corneta drunk.
  25. Mister22408
    Mister22408 April 20 2016 10: 46
    0
    English arabs laughing they say that the Turks spanked in this attack 32 (why not 132? lol ) gunman daish, the tank was damaged, the Turks have no casualties ... Awesome raid at 16 p.m., at a great distance and from the bottom up ... fellow
    http://www.albawaba.com/news/turkish-base-iraq-attacked-daesh-32-militants-kille
    d-clashes-831046
  26. ver_
    ver_ April 20 2016 10: 52
    0
    Quote: GSH-18
    Islamists knocked out Turkish tank from “Cornet” (video)

    Kondrat ("Cornet") crept up to the Turkish tank
    Turkish tank meeting was not very happy! lol


    And as our developers "gave a blunder", "Kondraty" is more consistent than "Cornet" to this "product" ..
  27. K-50
    K-50 April 20 2016 10: 59
    +2
    The fate of the crew and the nature of the damage to the tank are unknown "

    Well, what else could be the fate of the crew? Stuffing, and no options. request laughing
  28. drunkram
    drunkram April 20 2016 11: 24
    0
    The fate of the crew and the nature of the damage to the tank are unknown "

    In the sense? and what's that?
    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1859252.html#cutid1
  29. Taygerus
    Taygerus April 20 2016 12: 01
    0
    the Saudi campaign put the ISIS on the corridor;
  30. Jackking
    Jackking April 20 2016 12: 28
    +1
    Most likely, this is not the last incident with the attack on the Turks - they will become an official excuse for Ankara to send troops into Iraq. And there, under the guise of fighting ISIS, they will wet the Kurds ...
  31. vladimirw
    vladimirw April 20 2016 12: 34
    +1
    Glory to the Russian weapons!
  32. RPG_
    RPG_ April 20 2016 12: 50
    +2
    I am inclined to the fact that the movie is staged and there is no crew in the tank. A video was created to justify the invasion of Iraq.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. HMR333
    HMR333 April 20 2016 14: 35
    0
    there on the video, to be honest, it’s completely incomprehensible that they knocked out whether it was a tank or something else and if you know what the hell the tank is, since I don’t even know everything without a detailed blur!
  35. Gray wolf
    Gray wolf April 20 2016 19: 56
    -2
    complete garbage, where is the evidence that the tank is Turkish ??
  36. Professor
    Professor April 22 2016 08: 16
    -1
    Janes reports that the tank withstood the hit.
    Turkish tank survives Kornet missile strike