The Constitutional Court of Russia for the first time made a decision allowing the Russian Federation not to execute the ECHR verdict

For the first time in stories The Constitutional Court of Russia announced a verdict authorizing the Russian Federation not to execute the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). We are talking about the case, which in the materials of the ECtHR in its aggregate takes place as “Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia” (11157 / 04 and 15162 / 05).

The matter is connected with the fact that those sentenced to death penalty for murder in 90 (the sentence on the basis of the current moratorium is replaced by long terms of imprisonment) Sergey Anchugov and Vladimir Gladkov declared that they, as Russian citizens, are deprived of the right to elect, contrary to the Constitution.

The position of the applicants in the ECHR (portal Pravo.ru):

The ban on voting for convicts is contrary to Art. 3 Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (right to free elections). Russia, joining the Convention, did not stipulate any exceptions, and therefore, in accordance with part 4 of Art. 15 Constitution, an international agreement should apply. The argument that convicts are incapable of making an informed choice or may be subject to the pressure of criminal authorities do not withstand criticism, because according to the law, convicts must have access to information, and pressure can also be subjected to freedom.

The ECtHR has decided that Russia should ensure participation in elections for all categories of convicts, including those who have committed serious and especially grave crimes. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation stated that such a decision of the ECHR violates the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, and concluded that the decision of the ECHR in respect of Anchugov and Gladkov cannot be. At the same time, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation stated that they were ready to discuss the decision in the format of a dialogue with the functionaries of the ECHR so that the decision would not contradict Russian laws.

Comments

[tiredwithall]

Still the Fed would have been sent away. It is good to see how Russian legislation is growing stronger, restoring real sovereignty.

[St Petrov]

The more technology is updated in the army by 2020, the more our sovereignty will be felt in all kinds of affairs

[Kostyar]

Still the Fed would be sent away

And the IMF, with its recommendations, which our economic bloc implements unconditionally, contrary to the interests of Russian citizens !!!

[SRC P-15]

Killing a person, the killer deprives this person of everything: life, the right to be elected, the right to elect, the right to raise children, etc. So, by killing, he gives himself the right to control the fate of a person, but the state does, does it have such a right? There are no pipes, committing an offense, violating the rights of others, you thereby deprive yourself of these rights. Therefore, I fully and completely support the decision of our Constitutional Court.

[Saffron]

I absolutely agree, if you want to be a full citizen and participate in the life of society - do not break the rules and laws of this society!

[Monos]

Yeah, liberals did a lot of the time. Slowly returning sovereignty. Russian response to shakalya.

[sever.56]

http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/702/bvwn778.png

It is high time to correct the "shoals" that were laid in our legislation with the drunk - EBN, when you see, there was "the priority of international law over national".
That's all - the "EuroLiber" Sabbath must be over !!!
I hope that this is only the beginning of how we remove from our laws, and most importantly the Constitution, everything that in one way or another harms Russia!

[teron]

Made in the 90s young reformers. How much will we rake now and will we rake everything?

[drundel861]

be sure to rake, only at what cost

[Altona]

The fact that the ECHR was shaved is good. But the fact that this is done on this example is not very good. For example, I do not think that the voting of prisoners is some critical moment. And the fact that according to the decisions of the same ECHR, Navalny is regularly pecked at 60 thousand euros as from a bush, is certainly not comme il faut.

[Samen]

Could it be easier to lift the moratorium? At least in relation to Sergey Anchugov and Vladimir Gladkov?
I am not bloodthirsty. But, suddenly, it will help ....

[tiredwithall]

No rollbacks. We have democracy, equality and fraternity. Cancel forever, for all, in its entirety.

[Ezhaak]

Quote: Semen

But, suddenly, it will help.

Of course, it will help the Euro-liberoids drop thirty meters against the wind at the word Russia. So they already crap on 6-9 meters.
With the lifting of the moratorium, Russia will have to leave the European community. This condition was upon entry. And these are additions to possible sanctions. Or bad friends, or good to fight. Who chooses what? I believe that the sofa warriors will choose the second.

[Alf]

Quote: Hedgehog

With the lifting of the moratorium, Russia will have to leave the European community.

And how does the European community help Russia? What is Russia in the EU, what is not, for Europe, Russia will always be a rogue state.

[Ezhaak]

Quote: Alf

And how does the European community help Russia?

Nobody forced Russia to join the European assembly. This is a completely independent and voluntary decision. Does anyone really know this? And then a proverb came to mind: To live with wolves, howl like a wolf.
And Russia's help looks very simple. This is an imposition of one’s interests. Pushing pederasty, for example, into the territory of Russia. Is it really necessary to interpret this,

[Weyland]

Quote: Hedgehog

With the lifting of the moratorium, Russia will have to leave the European community.

So what? How does it hurt us, by and large?
ЧСХ, their overseas owners do not smell of any moratorium - and what, the EU has ceased to be friends with them because of this? They wait, as in a joke - they still find what to dig to?

[work67]

It’s time to take priority of Russian laws over Anglo-Saxon law.

[Eragon]

Quote: tiredwithall

Still the Fed would have been sent away. It is good to see how Russian legislation is growing stronger, restoring real sovereignty.

Unfortunately, the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank are not the COP.

[tiredwithall]

The problem will still have to be solved.

[Disorder]

In accordance with article 32, clause 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation “Citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent, as well as those held in places of deprivation of liberty by the court’s verdict,” do not have the right to elect and be elected.

The ECtHR may go to Peru.

[Obolensky]

Let's see what will happen next. The fact that we are getting rid of the mistakes of the past is good. The main thing is not to do them now. I always thought it was nonsense, like so, Russia is an independent sovereign state, and for some reason it is obliged to comply with some European laws ... Generally, nonsense. And the fact that some decisions have already begun to be canceled is already good. And yes - what can be the human rights of the one who killed the person ?!

[Arkan]

Do not pay special attention to the "democratic" quirks of Western "justice". Let them be happy, according to their laws, their women are to blame for being raped by troglodytes from the Middle East. They do not climb into a strange monastery with their own charter!

[atamankko]

It is time to become full-grown, let the liberals cave in before the West.

[Pinkie F.]

Part 4 of article 15 of the Constitution is high time to change. The primacy of national law over international be!)))

[Saffron]

And why should those sentenced to death (we count for life) participate in the elections? Now imagine that in Russia there are almost 700 thousand prisoners (according to international law - voters) + one hundred thousand people under investigation and what needs to be done to get these votes? right, promise them all-all-all. Nonsense, not international law!

[Altona]

Quote: Saffron

And why should those sentenced to death (we count for life) participate in the elections?

------------------------
And there are few suicide bombers. Within the statistical margin of error for elections. But the payments to "suffering liberals" for "suffering" are very sensitive.

[shinobi]

The trial ball has gone.

[serguchcho]

For reference: 48 US states + the District of Columbia explicitly prohibits convicts from participating in elections. Moreover, in 8 states this ban remains for life. Such is the "stronghold" of "democracy"

[bovig]

Quote: serguchcho

For reference: 48 US states + the District of Columbia explicitly prohibits convicts from participating in elections. Moreover, in 8 states this ban remains for life. Such is the "stronghold" of "democracy"

So they do not have a moratorium on the death penalty. They were sentenced - be kind to the block, or rather, an electric chair ... By all parameters, an "exceptional nation" - they impose on others what they consider unacceptable for themselves. It's time to send everyone inside your own democracy.

[yahont]

Well, finally waited, it's time to drive this organization back and forth and leave there ourselves.

[gerfalcon]

Bravo is just a round of applause. We have been waiting for this for a long time.

[voronbel53]

It is very original to give criminals the opportunity to influence the laws by which they do not live and which they violate. You give in each cell in Guantanamo a separate ballot box! .. Convicted to the death penalty, - only when they voted, - with a sense of accomplishment and with a clear conscience, - please, on an electric chair ...

[faterdom]

God forbid, not the last such decision. Give your head on your shoulders!

[Vasili09]

it’s high time to abandon these human rights conventions, and the constitution (I intend to write with a capital letter) must also be thrown out, we will have enough laws of the Russian Federation, otherwise these conversations about violation of the constitution are no longer ridiculous, they also came up with the basic law of direct action, into the furnace him, all the same props, Comrade Fedorov is right, we must change it