Military Review

Debt receipts now not in price

36
News of the week: Moscow has reduced the volume of investments in US securities. For the first time in four months, a transatlantic state financial machine registered a reduction in Russian injections into the US public debt (in February). For objectivity's sake, it should be noted that from February 2015 of the year to February of 2016, Russia increased its investment in US government securities by 18 billion dollars.




In February, 2016, Russia reduced its investments in US Treasury bonds by 9,3 billion dollars (to 87,6 billion dollars). According to the Treasury of the United States and the Federal Reserve System, a reduction in investment is noted for the first time in four months. Reports about it Rosbalt.

Other countries that are major US creditors, on the contrary, are increasing the volume of paper purchases.

In February, the volume of US debt obligations belonging to China increased by 14,4 billion dollars and amounted to 1,252 trillion. Doll.

Japan increased treasure investments in 9,6 billion dollars (to 1,133 trillion dollars).

Evidence of a reduction in Russian investments in US government bonds was published on 18 in April, recalls Utro.ru. The last time a decline in the volume of investments in promissory notes was recorded in October 2015.

Data on the number of bonds in circulation Washington announced after the stock exchange decline in US government securities. The fact is that the yield on ten-year bonds fell by 3 points (to 1,754%). Of course, falling returns have reduced the attractiveness of investing in these American assets.

The yield of “treasuries” went down after the release of a bleak statistical summary of industrial output (in March it fell in the US by 0,6%), and also against the background of another drop in oil prices. The consumer sentiment index fell to its lowest level since September 2015. And also low inflation in the USA - it can lead to the fact that the Fed will refrain from raising interest rates, which will lead to a fall in the attractiveness of securities for investors. However, so far this has not happened: first, as already noted above, large creditors continue to purchase “treasuries”; secondly, these securities have so far remained popular with investors (the monthly increase in investments amounted to more than 50 billion dollars).

As for Russia, the decline in purchases of these securities should not be overestimated.

As reported on April 15 TASS, for the year, Russia has increased the volume of investments in US government bonds by 18 billion.

Over the period from February 2015 to February 2016, the Russian Federation increased the volume of investments in US government securities by 18 billion dollars - from 69,6 billion to 87,6 billion. This was reported by the Treasury Department a few days ago, announcing a monthly investment report by others countries cash in US government bonds (following February 2016 g.).

According to the Ministry, in June 2015 of the year Moscow’s investments in “treasuries” amounted to 72 billion dollars, in July - 82,1 billion dollars, in August - 89,9 billion dollars, in September - 89,1 billion dollars, in October - 82 billion dollars, in November - 88 billion dollars, in December - 92,1 billion dollars, in January 2016 of the year - 96,9 billion dollars

In October and November 2014, the corresponding figures were 108,9 billion dollars and 108,1 billion dollars. It turns out that Russia's investments began to decline markedly since December 2014 (the figure was 86 billion dollars). The trend broke in May 2015 of the year: the volume of investments rose to 70,6 billion dollars from April 66,5 billion dollars.

Today, reminds TASS, Russia occupies the same place 15 in the list of holders of securities of the US government.

According to some American analysts, we add that the US national debt is about five thousand times higher than it was at the time when the Fed was created (December 1913).

Over the past forty years, US national debt has grown 36 times.

Data on US government debt can be viewed in real time. here. On 19, April, 2016, the debt is roundly 19,249 trillion. Doll.

But not so long ago, in 1980, the US debt was only approaching the rate of one (only one) trillion.

Ten years later, the size of the US debt is supposed to be much larger: thirty trillion dollars. Experts have no doubt that Washington is not in a position to solve the debt problem: there are neither funds nor financial prescriptions for this. In addition, the situation is greatly complicated by the current economic crisis.

True, potential presidential candidate Donald Trump promised to pay the US state debt for a couple of his presidential terms, but Trump doesn’t have faith: his statements are nothing more than pre-election chatter, and journalists have many times caught the billionaire on deception. Financiers simply laugh at Trump's “ideas.”

"The power of the enemy is based on the monopoly of the US oligarchy, which controls the Fed - the center of the issue of dollars - explains state of affairs Sergey Glazyev. - They print world currency. Not just like that, but under debt obligations, this is 90% of the dollar issue security. If you look at the charts - US national debt goes up exponentially. In mathematics, this is called a peaking mode. When a system enters such a regime, it inevitably collapses. American hegemony will come to an end anyway - this is an objective law. The sooner we get out of the financial pyramid of the dollar, the lower the losses will be, not only financial, but also human. A significant part of the dollar issue, which we subsidize, keeping our reserves in this currency, goes to military and terrorist operations. ”

In the 2014 year alone, the US authorities spent $ 86 billion on special operations abroad, according to budget and social programs specialist Alison Acosta Fraser. If the US government does not revise the economic course, then in the near future a financial collapse will break out in the States, believes he.

The high level of public debt (102% of GDP in 2014) threatens the United States with a significant slowdown in economic growth. In addition, it prevents the government from responding to unforeseen situations: after all, more and more budget funds are spent on debt servicing.

As the expert notes, over the next decade, interest payments on debt will more than triple - from 230 billion to 800 billion. Moreover, if credit markets demand higher interest rates, the debt scenario may worsen.

And the expert is right. Already today, as reported above, the announced drop in the yield of “treasuries” has reduced the attractiveness of investments in these American securities. Probably, given the decline in profitability, Russia will continue to invest less in US debt receipts, leaving the “financial pyramid of the dollar” according to the recipes of Comrade Glazyev.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist April 20 2016 06: 02
    +16
    Sooner or later, this "colossus" will collapse. And it will cover almost everyone with its debris. It is necessary to develop a strategy on how to reduce losses from this.
    1. mad
      mad April 20 2016 07: 14
      +3
      The Saudis stirred, the Americans were going to present them for the WTC skyscrapers, and they promised to throw all the debt receipts into the market. And them, they have decent)))
    2. max702
      max702 April 20 2016 07: 18
      +10
      Everything that is said in the article was disassembled and described in the writings of the classics, and this is called CAPITALISM ! This system cannot work differently! It is initially unprofitable! And as soon as there are no victims for the robbery, all this is covered by a copper basin .. On the planet, the earth has not been robbed, and accordingly capitalism is at its final stage, it will first eat itself from the inside (which is happening now) and this will end with a big explosion, most likely of the 3rd world war .. Who will survive and benefit will be impossible to predict .. But to avoid this collapse is almost unreal! those who have brewed this porridge and keep it warm, just because of everything that has been achieved will not refuse , and therefore with it will capture all the others ..
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A April 20 2016 08: 33
        +12
        Quote: max702
        Everything that is said in the article was disassembled and described in the writings of the classics, and this is called CAPITALISM! This system cannot work differently! It is initially unprofitable! And as soon as there are no victims for robbery, all this is covered with a copper basin .. There is no loot left on the planet on the planet, and accordingly, capitalism comes to its end, first it will eat itself from the inside (which is happening now) and this will end with a big bang, most likely World War III .. It’s impossible to predict who will survive and get the benefit .. But avoid this collapse is almost unreal! those who have brewed this porridge and keep it warm, just because of everything that has been achieved will not refuse , and therefore with it will capture all the others ..
        Here I once wrote about this, referred to Karl Marx - they did not believe me, threw sleepers ...

        I am sure that different Saudis and Australia buy American debts, allowing America to exist, because they say. And then the Saudis became envious.

        China does not buy American debt for profit, not for investing money - but to one day either destroy America or keep it on a VERY short lead.

        Our debt purchases of America from the bubble crisis, of course, will not save us - but this money would come in handy with us, and in America the extra ten million fat trusts will receive their social hamburgers. The question is - why should we care about American 150-kilogram black women eating their social hamburgers?

        War. Only a global war will save America, write off debts, open new markets for cut paper, will improve the American economy at the expense of the military-industrial complex. By the way, the American economy exists at the expense of the military-industrial complex and the FRS and nothing, but liberals tell us that the "defense industry" as a basic industry is bad. And how they lived under the Union - out of three, two were defensive factories - and there were no vagrants, everyone was full ...

        Generally, America is fattening, while all the others by their consent (or "cunning plan", like China) help her in this ...
        1. Azitral
          Azitral April 20 2016 12: 48
          +8
          1) Do you seriously think they are? For the most part, maybe people are dark, but those who lead are educated and smart and cunning. Why war? devalue the dollar ten thousand times, introduce "amero" backed by gold - so what? WHO and HOW will collect debts from them? The army is not going anywhere.
          2) The United States is not China; it has everything it needs without the "world" dollar: raw materials, food, and capacities. And the world's highest intellectual potential, albeit at the expense of visitors. And if you take it together with Canada, then even more so.
          3) Social obligations are easy to throw off, like a shred of hay with fleas together. Black women will lose weight and will work, or die. The National Guard will cope with the riots, they will not stand on ceremony with the parasites: either for the great constructions of capitalism or for the next world, the parasites are not sorry, and they deeply meant world public opinion. These are not Europeans, there will be plenty of rigidity. If you do not feed the loafers, but exploit them, then those received for candy wrappers in the past decades will be enough to survive the crisis and build a new system: black half-educated people clean garbage, and white tadpoles finish the sixth technological order. But this, of course, is easy to say. The risk, to put it mildly, is serious. Offhand, you can say that North-South contradictions or between individual states can play. And - yes, it will be a different country. Absolutely, up to the loss of self-identity.
        2. st25310
          st25310 April 20 2016 14: 18
          +1
          Eat pineapples, grouse chew,
          your last day is coming, bourgeois.
          November 1917, XNUMX
          Somewhere I already heard it ...
    3. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z April 20 2016 18: 13
      +4
      Ten years later, the size of the US public debt is expected to be a much larger amount: thirty trillion dollars. Experts have no doubt that Washington is not in a position to solve the debt problem: there are no funds or financial recipes for this.

      Let them ask the IMF for a solution to their financial problems!
      - cutting social
      - fix salaries
      - raise the retirement age
      - raise credit interest
      - take away "golden parachutes" from corporations
      - etc. etc. !
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy April 20 2016 06: 09
    +9
    "The announced drop in Treasury yields reduced the attractiveness of investments in these American securities. It is likely that, given the decline in yields, Russia will invest less in US IOUs in the future."

    Are you seriously? Does Russia make decisions based on benefits? Very funny.
    1. kagorta
      kagorta April 20 2016 06: 32
      +9
      This is a business, nothing personal. laughing
      Each riddle has a solution. The answer is called the US Federal Reserve's refinancing rate. The refinancing rate of the US Federal Reserve is the percentage at which large banks close to the state trough receive money. At the moment, the US Federal Reserve rate is 0,25%, and this is a very low rate.

      Now imagine yourself in the place of a thieves bank that can borrow money from the Fed. You get in the Fed, say, a billion freshly printed US dollars at 0,25% per annum for a period of one year. Then you buy for this billion US Treasury bonds - which will bring you 0,38% per annum in a year. The difference - 0,13% - you put in your pocket without any risk. It turns out a little, less than one and a half million dollars for every billion, but, I repeat, without any risk. And if the bank is allowed to take from the Fed not $ 1 billion, but, say, $ 50 billion, then the free amount received by the bank for mediation will also grow 50 times.

      Thus, the US Federal Reserve prints money and gives it through banks to the government - so that it can maintain military bases, arrange color revolutions around the world and, in general, live in a big way, as it is used to. However, outwardly it looks as if the bonds were bought up not by the printing press, but by honest external investors - such as China.
      The yield on bonds is very small - for ten-year bonds it is now, for example, about 2% per annum, and for one-year bonds - about 0,33%.

      This means that if today we buy one-year US Treasury bonds for $ 100, in a year we will get $ 100 and 33 cents.

      On the one hand, sparse. On the other hand, imagine that you will need to spend these $ 100 to repay a debt in a year. And you can’t quickly get these amounts in our economy, because no one will guarantee their return to the payment date. Since money is still doomed to lie idle for a whole year, it’s better to lie in bonds, albeit very low-yield ones, right?
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 April 20 2016 07: 39
        +14
        Kagorta
        Your explanation of the position of the Central Bank is understandable and true.
        These are the motives of the Central Bank.
        But, the economic bloc should deal with the country's economy, not be extras.
        The current model of the economy is flawed, even within the framework of the current realities, one can find leverage to increase its effectiveness.
        Simply analyze the statistics. When it comes to business, everyone understands that it’s more efficient to quickly get rid of low-liquid goods at half price and put the proceeds into circulation. The country also needs to accelerate the turnover in the economy, which is facilitated by the departure from the slave-owning habits of businessmen. This is the timely payment of a decent salary to working citizens of the country: this is what activates the supply and demand, increases tax revenues. There is a fee due to taxes from the salary and the purchase of goods to the treasury 61% = 13% + 30% + 18%. The state has leverage, they just need to be used. At least when fulfilling the state order, holding a tender. The state transfers money and can set conditions. The basis for determining the value of the order is the estimate, which provides for the salary with taxes, so there should be a condition for the payment of salaries and the transfer of taxes in the estimated amount.
        Manipulation of payment and salary should not be considered profit, it is a crime against the state and citizens. And enough to get rid of ridiculous fines, it is necessary to seize all income from salary manipulations in favor of the state, and the punishment in the form of a criminal with confiscation of property. Discipline such measures quickly.
        1. kagorta
          kagorta April 20 2016 08: 20
          +7
          Even in the cash cashing market (the most criminal business, and it is still controlled by state structures), the screws are tightened carefully and extremely slowly so as not to "collapse" the economy. For example, in order to stop fraud with VAT, the scheme of electronic counter checks of purchases was launched, only now, but could have been a long time ago. Because if they had done it earlier, there would have been more harm than good. We must carefully go through the stage of "Wild capitalism", all according to Lenin, there is a primary accumulation of capital. laughing
      2. Zvon
        Zvon April 20 2016 13: 14
        +1
        This is done only by banks that belong to the owners of the Fed: Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgan, etc., which is why these families are fabulously rich! And the rest of the world buys "trigeries" for their "hard-earned" money earned by sweat and blood, Russia by selling its natural resources, China by selling its cheap labor, Japan by selling technology, India by selling cheap intellectual labor, etc. And the reasons why different countries buy "Triches" from the United States are different, they force someone (Japan), someone by deception and blackmail (Saudi Arabia), someone by terrorists (everyone), someone wants to collapse the market (China), and who for economic reasons (Russia).
      3. fif21
        fif21 April 20 2016 18: 11
        0
        Quote: kagorta
        so let them lie better in bonds, albeit very low-yield, right?
        Not true! You forgot to count inflation laughing The dollar of 2014 and the dollar of 2015, as they say in Odessa, is a big difference laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. Beaver
      Beaver April 20 2016 11: 05
      +1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Are you seriously? Does Russia make decisions based on benefits?

      Decisions are made not by Russia, but by specific people, most likely, as you correctly noted, based on the benefits. laughing
  3. apro
    apro April 20 2016 06: 12
    0
    Of course, the news is good! The main thing is that this money go to Russia in Russian industry and playful hands do not reach.
    1. jetfors_84
      jetfors_84 April 20 2016 06: 18
      +9
      What news? What is the article about? It has long been spoken. The bear said no policy was purely business. Therefore, we buy debt ov. Although soon they themselves will have one doctor and teacher per district.
  4. Bongo
    Bongo April 20 2016 06: 17
    +10
    During the period from February 2015 to February 2016, the Russian Federation increased its investment in US government securities by 18 billion dollars - from 69,6 billion to 87,6 billion

    I guess I don’t understand something what Inside the country, our government is constantly raising taxes and introducing new requisitions under the pretext of filling the budget, and at the same time the money raised is invested at a meager percentage in the American economy.
    1. kagorta
      kagorta April 20 2016 08: 37
      +1
      Why the Soviet Union collapsed in terms of economics. The first deficit budget appeared only in 1991. With the ruble economy, everything was more or less good. Collapsed because a number of particularly important positions (for example, grain) had to be purchased for currency. And the trickle of currency into the country was extremely dry, amid a sharp drop in oil prices. And now our dependence has increased even more, because the USSR was more self-sufficient than the Russian Federation. Therefore, we need a supply of currency if you do not want a drop in your standard of living, in the form of food security, consumer goods, medicines and other things.
      1. fif21
        fif21 April 20 2016 18: 28
        0
        Quote: kagorta
        . Collapsed because a number of particularly important positions (for example, grain) had to be purchased for currency.

        No! Collapsed because it was more important not to produce the goods, but to report on its production! Themselves fooled laughing (cotton business, fur business, grain production ...) There are reports, but no goods! When they realized it, it was too late! THE PEOPLE are tired of waiting for a bright future. And got a "fun life"! You will get tired of the "fun life" and will not seem a little to anyone.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Beaver
      Beaver April 20 2016 10: 59
      0
      Quote: Bongo
      I guess I don’t understand something

      Same bullshit, I can only guess. Surely there is a reasonable explanation for what is happening, but neither I nor you "are not supposed to know it." request
    3. fif21
      fif21 April 20 2016 17: 41
      +3
      Quote: Bongo
      During the period from February 2015 to February 2016, the Russian Federation increased its investment in US government securities by 18 billion dollars - from 69,6 billion to 87,6 billion
      And at the same time everyone is convinced that in Russia there is no money for the development of industry! laughing For its not, for the American there am Let them give loans to business at 5% and it’s more profitable! And so we need foreign investment, we need foreign investment, but the state of the Russian Federation will not give investments! am And translated into Russian, this means that the Russian economy is forced to work for the economy of the West, and after that we are looking for the 5th column !. Gorbachev's case - blooms and expands laughing
    4. The comment was deleted.
  5. kagorta
    kagorta April 20 2016 06: 22
    +6
    As I was neglected, in previous articles, when I wrote that the trend towards a decrease in our investments in American obligations has been three years already. And we just do not earn much before paying off the debt.
    I repeat for everyone, as long as there is a return on these obligations, we will periodically invest in them, not make a lot of money and sell.
    For example, in the crisis year of 2008, Moscow invested a record amount in American securities, investments grew 3,5 times over the year from $ 32,6 billion to $ 116,4 billion (Kudrin simply did not let this money be stolen as a financier, but economists didn’t guaranteed that they will be invested and returned). By the end of 2013, Russia had already invested as much as 138,6 billion dollars in US treasury bonds and had already begun to break into the top 10 largest holders of US securities.
    However, in 2014, just against the backdrop of the aggravation of the geopolitical confrontation with the United States (in the context of Ukraine), Russia began a countdown. Since August 2014, Russia began to get rid of American papers especially actively.

    Over the past year, Russia's investments in Treasury decreased by $ 52,6 billion - almost 38%. In January - April, this trend continued. Therefore, even despite the May reverse trend, in general, American papers now hold almost two times less Russian reserves than at the end of 2013. So, in December 2013, the volume of US government securities in the Russian portfolio amounted to 138,6 billion dollars, in August 2014 - already 118,1 billion dollars, after building up securities in May - only 70,6 billion dollars. If in August last year, Russia was in 12th place in the list of the largest holders of US bonds, then as of May 2015 - already in 20th place. Russia skipped ahead Norway, Canada and France.

    Interestingly, the cooling trend for US Treasury bonds was noted not only from Russia, but also from other foreign central banks. In the first weeks of March 2014, investments in American Treasuries collapsed immediately by more than $ 100 billion. This was the largest drop in the history of data collection. This is more than three times the previous $ 32 billion fall record set in mid-2013.
    Therefore, we are slowly getting rid of bonds so that we do not lose our hard-earned money on the "sale".
    1. max702
      max702 April 20 2016 07: 30
      +6
      Quote: kagorta
      (Kudrin simply did not let this money be stolen as a financier, and economists did not guarantee that they would invest it and return it).

      So we come to the most important problem .. It turns out that the state is able to organize its work so that it is effective (no theft), and who is doing this in our country? Right GOVERNMENT! And Kudrin played one of the first violins there, so he stole! BUT for yourself! And he did not allow others to steal! At the same time, neither doing anything useful for the state! Apart from "saving" money .. YOU have read the parable about "talent"? It was from her that the expression came to bury talent in the ground! This is how incompetent bureaucrats, instead of working effectively, sit on money and clearly declare like we are maintaining stability, and stability, as you know, is the beginning of decline! You just have to work! And without doing anything to keep money in "reliable" pieces of paper of the most probable enemy, thereby causing direct and indirect damage to your country! You have to shoot so talented! The heel of the trains will change, you look at the sixth and begin to work ..
      1. kagorta
        kagorta April 20 2016 08: 28
        +1
        Shooter, another ...
        Where are you going comrade? In the 37th year? This country has already passed. The only evolutionary path, no revolutions, no terror (besides the terror of the law, only the human, normal law). Go to the polls, vote, create your own party. And live within the framework of the democratic process. Only for this you need to be honest and hungry, with a crystalline look. Then the people will reach for you and you will bring order to the country. laughing
        1. max702
          max702 April 20 2016 12: 14
          +3
          Quote: kagorta
          Shooter, another ...
          Where are you going comrade? In the 37th year? The country has already passed

          Yes, it went through countries .. And you do not remember what it was accompanied by? Let me remind you of unprecedented economic growth! Which forced the world capital to force the solution of the Soviet / Russian question .. But here, thanks in particular and 37mu, they were able to achieve success, despite the fact that everything and everything was against us .. Maybe now we can act according to old recipes?
      2. Beaver
        Beaver April 20 2016 10: 50
        +2
        I will explain the basics of macroeconomics (can be found in any textbook):
        1. At a high refinancing rate, money goes from the real economy to the banking sector. At low - from the banking sector to production.
        2. Low refinancing rate weakens the national currency.
        3. The weakening of the national currency gives domestic producers a price advantage in the foreign market, and favors import substitution.

        What is the refinancing rate set by the CBR today?
        Quote: max702
        You have to shoot so talented!
        1. kagorta
          kagorta April 20 2016 13: 34
          +2
          This is true, but true in theory. The low rate in our realities led to the fact that everyone rushed to buy dollars on credit. And this rate is more a protectionist measure in defense of the ruble. I just thought that they would subsidize this rate for our industry, but they chose a more corrupt path, namely financing for projects.
          1. Beaver
            Beaver April 20 2016 15: 41
            0
            Quote: kagorta
            The low rate in our realities led to the fact that everyone rushed to buy dollars on credit.

            As implied in clause 2, I do not think that everyone would rush to buy dollars. With affordable loans you can buy a lot of interesting cut paper. laughing However, I have to admit that expensive loans are not the only "weight" on the feet of our entrepreneurs. recourse
            1. kagorta
              kagorta April 20 2016 15: 58
              +1
              It was even more interesting to bet on the exchange in rubles received on credit that the ruble would fall, and these wings were cut off by these bets by rates).
              For Nabiullina, this is the main jamb that quickly did not, like the Kazakhs, for example. They have the head of the Central Bank wonder where he studied? He did everything quickly and correctly, well done.
              1. max702
                max702 April 21 2016 08: 33
                0
                Quote: kagorta
                It was even more interesting to bet on the exchange in rubles received on credit that the ruble would fall,

                We live in the 21st century and “impersonal” money does not exist! It is well known who put the money on the stock exchange, from which account, which bank .. This is a purely technical question .. And you just need a WISH! To stop this, we found out which bank, who took decisions from which funds, received a loan from the central bank for the construction of a small factory, and somehow miraculously these funds were on the stock exchange .. EVERYTHING! Guide to withdraw and shoot at the wall of this bank! Was it they who made the decision to put money on the stock exchange? They are! so they answer too .. All a couple of such cases and all speculation will stop, there would be a desire, but to track who and what is not a difficult technical issue ..
                1. kagorta
                  kagorta April 21 2016 09: 03
                  +1
                  And how to ban what is allowed. Just not legal means. Form mobile squadrons and clearly explain to customers. fellow
                  Your DESIRE, this is the road to hell.
                  Enter huge taxes, kill the exchange in the figurative sense of the word.
          2. fif21
            fif21 April 20 2016 18: 00
            0
            Quote: kagorta
            all rushed to buy dollars on credit
            We recognized the primacy of the dollar, and the primacy of the US economy, further comments are unnecessary. crying Tie off the Russian economy from the dollar - no mind am or wishes! Everything will remain as it was - who does not agree - that "b" lol
          3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Patriot 1
      Patriot 1 April 20 2016 08: 58
      0
      I completely agree with you. Money invested in US debt securities cannot be stolen. There are really risks of losing them altogether (but so far this is unlikely). Invest in your own economy - "most of it will be sawn on approach to the destination."
      1. Beaver
        Beaver April 20 2016 10: 55
        +3
        Quote: Patriot 1
        I completely agree with you. Money invested in US debt securities cannot be stolen. There are really risks of losing them altogether (but so far this is unlikely). Invest in your own economy - "most of it will be sawn on approach to the destination."

        I completely agree with you. Give all your money to me and you will not be able to steal it. There are true risks of losing them altogether (but so far this is unlikely). Leave it to yourself - drive through and about ... well, in short, spend on yourself. laughing
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. fif21
      fif21 April 20 2016 17: 48
      +4
      Quote: kagorta
      I repeat for all, as long as there is a return on these obligations
      Who told you that? Profitability 2%, inflation 6% request Loss however! Stop "annoying" people. It's pure politics and no economics! HSE on bunks. am
      1. kagorta
        kagorta April 23 2016 18: 32
        0
        HSE on the bunk, that's for sure, because the enemies, but only by law, for the cause. But you have to pay a debt of 10000 rubles. You have this amount on hand. And is it possible to twist them and get 500 rubles? Give up?
    5. The comment was deleted.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. mamont5
    mamont5 April 20 2016 06: 30
    +6
    Quote: armored optimist
    Sooner or later, this "colossus" will collapse. And it will cover almost everyone with its debris. It is necessary to develop a strategy on how to reduce losses from this.

    So this strategy works. Slowly, little by little, so as not to scare anyone ahead of time and not lose yours on dumping bucks.
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 20 2016 06: 49
    +1
    While there is no normally working replacement for the dollar,
    to destroy it makes no sense. For world losses will be comparable with the military.
    So it’s too early to give up the dollar.
    Well, if you get rid, it’s not fast, so that there would be no panic.
  9. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist April 20 2016 06: 53
    +1
    Now, if the quarrel between America and the Saudis comes to its logical conclusion. The first will arrest holdings, but they will refuse to sell the black blood of the earth for green candy wrappers ... Oh, and we will rattle under panfares!
    1. kirgudu
      kirgudu April 20 2016 07: 43
      +6
      The regime will be declared bloody, coalition troops will enter and will take oil for free.
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 20 2016 07: 06
    +3
    Looking at the investment figures, you understand that China and Japan theoretically can ruin the United States overnight.
    according to the recipes of comrade Glazyev.

    The government does not want to listen to Glazyev’s advice and recommendations. They now again Kudrin will be the chief economic consultant.
    1. Armored optimist
      Armored optimist April 20 2016 07: 08
      0
      "can ruin the United States overnight"
      And myself too. Therefore, everyone is afraid and does not dump these "securities"
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 April 20 2016 07: 40
        0
        That's why I wrote - theoretically.
  11. kirgudu
    kirgudu April 20 2016 07: 22
    +2
    The author writes what he wants to see. In annual terms, the debt fanatics we bought at 18 billion. bucks. http://ticdata.treasury.gov/Publish/mfh.txt
    1. Vitwin
      Vitwin April 20 2016 07: 44
      +2
      Quote: kirgudu
      The author writes what he wants to see.

      The casket is probably easier to open - there is no money, no investments and fs .. and the rest is the foam and fantasies peculiar to Dude))
  12. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 20 2016 07: 47
    +6
    Something about "securities".
    All that we give to non-Jews now is pieces of paper that have no intrinsic value and copper coins, but we don’t give them any more gold or silver, just paper, but for these fools we call them “securities”. We Jews prosper because of the manipulation of this so-called securities, only they are valuable not for non-Jews, but for us Jews. This is our method, when we take away their labor, services and real values ​​from the goyim, and in return we give them pieces of paper.
  13. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat April 20 2016 08: 56
    +5
    Oh, come on - "IOUs are out of value today." Who is "out of value"? Like the demand for Treasuries has fallen in Russia? The author himself writes in the middle of the article that in 2015 Russia invested more money in these bonds than in the previous one and continues to remain in its place in the list of the main holders of these securities. And the global trend just suggests that other countries (such as Japan) are even increasing purchases of these securities. The latest decrease in the purchases of these bonds by Russia is explained not by the fact that they have "lost their attractiveness" for us, but by a banal decrease in state revenues. Despite the cheerful reports of the prime minister and other government officials holding power about the "growing economy", "overcoming the crisis", etc., Russia simply has less and less "free" money to invest somewhere.
  14. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn April 20 2016 09: 13
    0
    Exchange speculation has become uninteresting to Russia, for sure there was a more profitable investment of money than financing the US economy. Or maybe some facts become known about which they are silent, the sale by the Saudis, for example, of US securities. In any case, we continue to look forward to when this world debtor will begin to bend. China is playing its game, wants to take the States on a short leash. Maybe it will ....
  15. Vasili09
    Vasili09 April 20 2016 09: 19
    0
    cunning Americans, they hooked everyone on their dollars, so don’t get off, neither the Saudis nor the Chinese are going to do it by the way, the Saudis don't need a tanker full of dollars, and the Chinese don’t want to lose the market
    By the way, if suddenly, well, their volcano explodes ... the aliens will attack, I don’t even know which option is more realistic, the economy of the SSE will collapse, then it will bury everyone
  16. husband
    husband April 20 2016 09: 23
    +2
    So you imagine:
    Your salary is 500 000 r per year
    And you collected debts of 500 000 r per year at 1,5%, i.e. for a year of using money you pay only 7 500 rubles.
    Doesn't it bother you?
    Now we add the annual growth of your earnings by 3,5% (US GDP growth) - 17 rubles. We take away the interest on the loan, but you are in positive territory for 500 rubles. Not bad.
    For ten years, 100 rubles of revenue growth through compound interest will come.
    Thus, everyone sees that money is working in the state economy. And lend them.
    Now about the return - everyone (China, Japan, us, etc.) needs reserves, and the simultaneous return of their reserves will hit their value. Who needs this?
    But even imagine what we need ...
    You have been asked back for the entire debt of 500 rubles. Problem? NO! You borrowed money that you print yourself. Swipe over the keyboard in the Fed and voila - all debts paid.
    Well, inflation, of course, and other problems will be, but this is temporary and only a step towards the next economic cycle.
  17. ruAlex
    ruAlex April 20 2016 09: 23
    +2
    Yes, Comrade Glazyev seems to be saying the right thing, only why he is listened to so little is a question.
  18. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 20 2016 09: 29
    0
    And what will China and Japan do when the state pyramid collapses, and all other states, and what will happen to ordinary people? Who then hang, Kudrin, so he does not make decisions.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 20 2016 09: 48
      +1
      Nothing of them will collapse there - if necessary, the USA can restructure the debt - it will decrease by several times and FIG who refuses them.
  19. kirgudu
    kirgudu April 20 2016 09: 47
    +2
    Damn, our Bear calls investing in candy wrappers in the USA - a good investment.
    What an awesome profitability in annual percent, we certainly will not die of hunger !:
    1 month 0,18%
    1 year - 0,57%
    30 year olds - 2,5% per annum.

    That's just what I think today a bear medal will be awarded to financiers, I suppose for that.
    1. fif21
      fif21 April 20 2016 19: 54
      0
      Quote: kirgudu
      What an awesome rate of return in annual percent, we certainly will not die of starvation !: 1 month 0,18% 1 year - 0,57%
      15 year inflation in the US 0,4%
      yield of securities 0,17% per year, well, directly wealthy laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  20. Karabin
    Karabin April 20 2016 10: 22
    +2
    Probably, taking into account the decline in profitability, Russia will continue to invest less in US debt "receipts", leaving the "financial pyramid of the dollar" according to the recipes of Comrade Glazyev

    And when did we use the recipes for Comrade Glazyev? But the recipes of Comrade Kudrin, who is the best comrade to the guarantor, went on and on.
  21. dvg1959
    dvg1959 April 20 2016 11: 47
    0
    Other countries that are major US creditors, on the contrary, are increasing the volume of paper purchases.

    There are certainly positive aspects to reducing investments in the US economy, but there are also negative aspects.
    What is the advantage? To understand, you need to conduct a deep analysis by competent persons.
  22. Forever so
    Forever so April 20 2016 12: 52
    +2
    Speaking to the State Duma, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev explained why the Russian side is acquiring foreign financial instruments, including US government bonds, RIA Novosti reports.
    Communist Party deputy Nikolai Kolomeitsev asked the head of government if it was time to stop investing Russian money in American debt. Medvedev replied that this comes from "pure commercial calculation" and urged not to look for ideology in this.
    According to data released in March, in 2015 Russia increased its investment in US government bonds by $ 14.7 billion - as of January, it amounted to $ 96.9 billion (s)

    Comprador governments of all countries are fueling the US economy today with the resources of these countries. Well then, the benefactor will collapse, but what about offshore accounts ?? house in may ?? after all, the University of Yale, where our lawyer is so eager to teach.
  23. fif21
    fif21 April 20 2016 17: 18
    0
    Quote: Forever so
    Speaking to the State Duma, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev explained why the Russian side is acquiring foreign financial instruments, including US government bonds, RIA Novosti reports.
    I heard that too, but the answer is not convincing. Some sort of "purely commercial calculation" is strange. Are there really no more profitable securities? And this, after the West refuses to acquire our securities! I don't know what to think at all. what
  24. demotivator
    demotivator April 20 2016 19: 12
    +4
    I quote DA Medvedev on RIA Novosti.
    "Regarding the purchase of foreign financial instruments, including those denominated in dollars and euros. We understand that there is no place for ideology here, but pure commercial calculation. If these instruments were denominated and issued in tenge, yuan or rupee, we would buy them. If our instruments are capable of generating such returns, we will invest in our instruments. "
    He is not the prime minister, but labor lessons in rural areas need to be taught, and even that is not a fact that he himself will not be crippled and the children will not be beaten.
    Well, what kind of an idiot should you be to give your grandmothers to someone else’s uncle for half a percent and then immediately begin to beg (and it’s especially cool not to get them) on loan at 5 percent or more ??????
    Yes, you can just get fucked - what a subtle commercial calculation!
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 20 2016 22: 03
      0
      Quote: demotivator
      Yes, you can just get fucked - what a subtle commercial calculation!

      Why are you all clinging to words ...... They’re not albesians, so they see from the ceiling that others don’t know - in our conditions it really can be more reliable, otherwise they will gut the little egg .... It’s better to be unpopular and do it right than vice versa. You are for?
  25. fif21
    fif21 April 20 2016 20: 10
    +1
    Quote: demotivator
    Well, what kind of an idiot should you be to give your grandmothers to a stranger uncle for half a percent and immediately start to beg (and it’s especially cool not to get them) on loan at 5 percent or more ?????? Et yes, just go nuts possible - what a delicate commercial calculation!
    Sberbank offers me 0,2% per annum on foreign currency deposits laughing inflation in the USA over the year 15 0.4% that is, it considers me repeat I also want at 5% per annum! Let me beg!
  26. 4ekist
    4ekist April 21 2016 00: 17
    0
    Quote: apro
    Of course, the news is good! The main thing is that this money go to Russia in Russian industry and playful hands do not reach.

    I think that there’s nothing to pour in.
  27. yesdvt
    yesdvt April 21 2016 00: 29
    +1
    It’s just not necessary to star as inflation in the USA over the past year is only 0.1% for 2014 1.6% for 2013 1.5%.

    http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/


    Everything is considered based on prices in the so-called “consumer basket” which is measured every month by volunteers throughout the United States. Welcome to pamper the labor department website

    http://www.bls.gov/