Project of the AAAV / EFV landing vehicle

16
According to the latest data, the US Marine Corps is planning to modernize the AAV7A1 amphibious assault vehicles, which will allow them to operate at least until the early thirties. According to older plans, by now the mass production of a new similar machine, which was intended to replace the existing technology, was supposed to start. However, the EFV project was never fully implemented and brought to its logical conclusion, which is why the ILC was forced to continue operating the existing equipment.

The EFV (Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle - “Expedition Vehicle”) project was launched in the first half of the eighties under the name AAAV (Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle - “Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle”). The objective of this project was to create a promising amphibious armored vehicle adapted for the implementation of the so-called. over-horizon landing. The main requirements for the project concerned the level of protection, firepower and high speed of movement through the water. A promising amphibian had to develop high speed on land and on water, and after going ashore to protect the troops and support them with fire.

In the first half of the eighties, the first AAAV project schedule was approved. Until the mid-nineties, it was planned to form the terms of reference for the project, as well as conduct some necessary research. In this case, the first half of the nineties was set aside for the creation of preliminary projects by firms applying for a contract. In the second half of the nineties should choose one of the proposed projects for further development. In the middle of the two thousandth, tests were scheduled, and in the second half of the decades, the AAAV machines were supposed to go into series. It should be noted, due to the mass of serious problems, the work on the project was carried out with significant delays in the schedule at all stages.


General view of the machine on land


The specific requirements associated with high water speeds led to the emergence of several serious design problems. So, for acceleration for the required 40-50 km / h, a suitable hull should have been developed and the car should be equipped with an appropriate power unit capable of driving through water and land. At the same time, the AAAV vehicle was to receive an armored corps with protection not lower than the 4 level according to NATO standards. Thus, there were serious problems with the combination of strength and weight of the structure. Finally, in the course of the work several more basic tasks were formulated, without the solution of which it was impossible to carry out the development of the project.

The variants of perspective armored vehicles for participation in the AAAV project were offered to the company General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) and the United Defense Limited Partnership (UDLP). Preliminary drafts of two amphibians were developed already in the late eighties, which made it possible to proceed to experiments on prototypes and prototypes. Until the mid-nineties, project participants collected six prototypes for various purposes, intended primarily to test certain solutions. For example, the HWSTD 1989 prototype of the year with a mass of more than 16 t was equipped with jet propellers, with the help of which it could be accelerated on water to 56 km / h.

In the mid-nineties, after analyzing the submitted projects, the winner of the competition was GDLS. As subcontractors, she recruited several other organizations, including the German MTU engine company. It had to be responsible for the creation of a promising dual-mode engine designed for movement on water and on land.


GDLS AAAV / EFV Scheme


The AAAV project from General Dynamics was recognized as fully compliant with the requirements of the customer and became the winner of the competition. This project offered several original ideas and solutions that allowed to provide the required characteristics and solution of the assigned combat missions. The original look of the armor hull, non-standard power plant, chassis, etc. were proposed. In addition, the project provided a set of tools designed to improve the hydrodynamic characteristics of the hull.

A promising amphibious amphibious ship was to receive an armored corps capable of withstanding hitting 14,5-mm bullets, as well as providing protection from fragments of artillery shells. At the same time, he had to have the lowest possible weight that did not degrade the characteristics of the machine on the water. The impossibility of using homogeneous armor with the required characteristics made the project authors use a combined protection based on titanium and aluminum alloys, as well as some composites and ceramic materials.

It was reported about the possibility of equipping the car with hinged modules of additional booking, which increase the level of protection. In addition, in 2010, work began on creating a new composite protection, which was planned to be introduced into the new AAAV modifications. The objective of this project was to preserve the required protection while reducing the weight of the structure.

Project of the AAAV / EFV landing vehicle
Target practice


The project provided for equipping the machine with additional means of protection. A set of special sensors had to capture the laser radiation of the enemy’s systems, after which it was necessary to use a noise of the appropriate type: a smoke screen, an infrared illuminator, etc.

In terms of the shape of the body, the AAAV should not be different from other similar techniques. The project envisaged a box-shaped hull shape with a frontal part consisting of two main armor plates. At the same time, the car received the bottom of a special profile, designed to optimize the flow around when moving through water.

The layout of the hull was formed taking into account the solution of basic technical problems. The front of the case was allocated for the placement of the transmission compartment, behind which the control compartment was supposed to be located. For the last placed fighting compartment with a tower. In the center of the case was placed a relatively large engine compartment with the main units of the power plant. Aft hull was given under the accommodation of the troop compartment.


Desert trials


In the department of management it was proposed to place the driver (left) and the commander of the landing (right). The vehicle commander and gunner were located in the turret, and the stern compartment contained 16 fighters with weapons. If necessary, instead of landing, it was possible to transport up to 2,5 tons of cargo. The crew of the vehicle and the commander of the landing had their own hatches in the roof of the hull and turret, and the landing had to use a lowered ramp in the rear hull sheet.

To move on the ground or on the water, the AAAV Amphibian had to use a variable power MTU 833 dual-mode engine. When driving on land, the engine used liquid cooling with a radiator and could produce no more than 850 hp. At the same time, torque was transmitted to the front drive wheels using a manual transmission with an automatic transmission. When launched, it was proposed to apply cooling with seawater and transfer the engine power to two jet propulsion with a diameter of 23 inch (584 mm) in the stern. Cooling with outboard water allowed us to develop power up to 2702 hp.

Especially for AAAV, an original chassis has been developed, providing some performance enhancement when driving on water. On each side of the car there were seven rubber-coated road wheels of relatively small diameter with an individual hydropneumatic suspension. When entering the water, it was proposed to raise the rollers to the upper position and pull up the track. In this case, the caterpillar was supposed to rise to the level of the bottom, being placed between it and the side screens.


One of the jobs in the tower


Jet propulsion performed in the form of two blocks in the aft hull. The water was taken through the windows in the bottom, the release through the corresponding windows in the stern sheet. To control the course it was proposed to use partial closure of the output windows. The sides provided opening sash reverse. According to reports, the 2702-strong engine and water cannons allowed to develop a thrust of the order of 10 t.

Studies have shown that acceleration of the armored vehicle to high speeds is possible only in the gliding mode. For this, AAAV has received a set of additional funds. Two sheets with hydraulic drives were installed in the frontal part of the hull. At the stern was located U-shaped design. Falling down, the front sheets were to form a shield of the required size and configuration. The stern shield, in turn, was located in a horizontal position. The lowered shields supplemented the bottom profile and additionally reduced the water resistance, allowing the movement speed to be increased.

In the fighting compartment it was proposed to install a rotary double turret with weapons. The main weapon of armored vehicles identified the automatic gun Mk44 Bushmaster II caliber 30 mm. On the same machine with it was mounted 7,62-mm machine gun M240. The tower was equipped with a weapon stabilizer and a set of various equipment for observing, searching and firing targets. The ammunition consisted of 600 shells for guns and 2400 cartridges for machine guns. On the sides of the tower were smoke grenade launchers.


Landing troops


The relatively high requirements for payload led to the AAAV being quite large and heavy. The length of the vehicle (along the hull) was 9,33 m, when opening the front shield, the longitudinal dimensions increased to 10,67 m. The width of the machine was 3,66 m, height (on the tower roof) - 3,28 m. The combat weight was determined at 36 t.

The estimated maximum speed on the highway was 70 km / h. On the water, the AAAV should accelerate to 45-50 km / h. Fuel tanks with a total capacity of 325 gallons (1230 l) provided a cruising range on the highway over 520 km and up to 120 km on water.

The AAAV project initially developed two major modifications. The main one was the landing vehicle for transporting personnel, known as AAAV (P). In addition, the proposed command and staff modification AAAV (C). It differed from the basic version by other equipment of the landing compartment, in which there were only seven crew seats, and also provided a set of special equipment for receiving, processing and transmitting data, as well as for controlling the troops.


EFV machine on the water. Shields down


By the end of the nineties, GDLS, chosen by the winner of the competition, was ready to build a new type of experimental machine. It was assumed that in the near future the first prototype will be built, which will soon be released for testing. At this stage, it was decided to change the name of the project. Now, the amphibious assault vehicle was to be called EFV. This name was applied until the very end of the project.

By the middle of the two thousandth, the finished prototype of the AAAV / EFV amphibian passed the necessary ground tests, after which the water tests started. Despite various minor problems and "childhood diseases", the machine as a whole coped with the tasks assigned to it. It was experimentally proved that the EFV can reach the required speed and carry out the landing to the coast during an over-the-horizon landing.

It should be noted, the mass of technical and technological difficulties several times led to noticeable shifts in the timing of the execution of certain works. As a consequence, the original plans were not implemented. In addition, there was a noticeable problem in the form of a constant increase in the cost of the project, which was not yet ready to launch mass production. As of the middle of 2010, the start of the assembly of the installation batch of hundreds of machines was planned for 2012 year. The launch of full-scale production is scheduled for 2015 year. By this time, the project had spent about 15,2 billion dollars.


High speed driving


The complexity and high cost of the project led to the fluctuations of the potential customer and operator, as well as to the adjustment of plans. So, it was originally planned that the installation batch will consist of X-amp amphibians, and a full-fledged order will make 100 units of new technology in two versions. Due to the increasing cost of the project, in connection with which the price of a serial armored car passed through 1013 million, in 22, it was decided to reduce the future order to 2007 machines. In the future, new cuts in plans were not excluded, due to the rising cost of the entire project as a whole and a single machine in particular.

The constant increase in the cost of the project coincided with the plans of the US leadership to reduce the military budget. Having been assigned the task of reducing costs, the Pentagon was forced to wind down a number of promising projects, the further implementation of which was associated with unacceptably high spending. Among other developments, the landing amphibian EFV came under the reduction. At the beginning of 2011, it became known that the draft military budget for the 2012 fiscal year does not envisage any expenditure on the development of a promising armored vehicle for the marines. All work was stopped due to lack of funding and interest from the customer.

Stopping the project also led to the cancellation of plans for the deployment of mass production. From 2012, General Dynamics Land Systems was to build and deliver the first hundred armored vehicles to the customer, and then deliver another 573 unit. For obvious reasons, as a result, the production of EFV machines was limited to only experienced equipment.


Water tests


The draft airborne combat vehicle AAAV / EFV had a number of positive features, but it was not without flaws. The main advantage was considered a high speed on the water, reaching 45-50 km / h. This made it possible to bring ashore a platoon of marines and continue to support them with fire. To create such a technique, it was necessary to conduct a number of important studies and experimental work, the results of which were used to solve the main design problems.

The main disadvantage of the project was its cost. With the observed increase in the cost of the program, the continuation of work was considered unacceptably expensive. In addition, even before closing, some other claims were made to the project. For example, the profiled bottom of the hull, designed for movement on water in gliding mode, became the reason for criticism. Coping with its main function, it did not correspond to modern views on protection against explosive devices. In addition, the excessive complexity of the project was noted.

EFV project work stopped at 2011. Attempts are being made to use the experience gained in new projects, but the general trends in the field of American armored vehicles do not allow to fully implement it. According to the latest data, some developments on AAAV / EFV can be used in a promising project, which will start in the foreseeable future. According to current plans, at the beginning of the thirties, a promising amphibious amphibian, designated as ACV 2.0, should go into service with the US Marine Corps. During its creation it is supposed to apply the existing experience gained during the EFV project.

The ACV 2.0 project, which may be a further development of AAAV / EFV, starts only a few years later. However, the ILC still needs airborne landing craft. Due to the lack of new amphibious vehicles of this class, it was decided to upgrade the existing fleet of old AAV7A1. Due to the failure of a promising EFV project, outdated technology will have to serve for another two decades.


On the materials of the sites:
http://globalsecurity.org/
http://defense-update.com/
http://armyrecognition.com/
http://otvaga2004.ru/
http://army-technology.com/
http://onr.navy.mil/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 19 2016 06: 27
    Interestingly, why are there some "brooms" below on the sides? smile
    1. +1
      April 19 2016 10: 26
      "Brooms" most likely act as screens to reduce resistance - they reduce the circulation of water above and "inside" the caterpillar during planing.
      1. +1
        April 19 2016 10: 34
        When gliding on this machine, the track is covered by a screen.
        1. +1
          April 19 2016 12: 58
          The caterpillar, as I understand it, is pulled up with the rollers flush with the bottom, but the cracks remain, and on the 50 km \ h across the water this is critical.
      2. -1
        April 21 2016 07: 03
        Quote: Lance
        "Brooms" most likely act as screens to reduce resistance - they reduce the circulation of water above and "inside" the caterpillar during planing.

        You are absolutely right. That’s why they are created.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          April 22 2016 12: 10
          i think we will get these updates
  2. +1
    April 19 2016 06: 49
    Personal opinion: such mixtures of a bulldog with a rhino are not viable. A specialized landing boat can deliver to the shore and platoon MP and even a full tank. At the same time, seaworthiness, cruising range of the boat will be higher. Yes, and the boat can support the fire at the cutoff of water.
    And so it turns out a car with the weight of the tank, armor and fire capabilities of an infantry fighting vehicle and the price of an airplane (not upgraded su27 in 2009 prices tentatively).
  3. +1
    April 19 2016 07: 00
    Quote: Bayonet
    Interestingly, why are there some "brooms" below on the sides?

    Most likely to improve hydrodynamics and increase speed on water. Since anti-cumulative screens are stupid to do there. With a grenade launcher at such a level from the ground, do not fry, anti-aircraft mines, I also hit higher.
    I liked the height in the car. Good target. Although I understand that this is the flip side of seaworthiness.
  4. +2
    April 19 2016 07: 28
    With such dimensions - a gorgeous target on the battlefield.
  5. 0
    April 19 2016 08: 31
    Not bad money was cut, and they were still going to cut it. Judging by the dimensions of the car, the next one would be the size of a tank-landing ship, with a helipad, cabins, bars. and all things ....
  6. 0
    April 19 2016 09: 19
    At the beginning of 2011, it became known that the draft military budget for fiscal year 2012 does not include any expenses for the development of a promising armored vehicle for the marine corps. All work was stopped due to lack of funding and interest from the customer.

    And our Serdyukov, they at this time, did not work? laughing Or they themselves, are able to ring loot! laughing fellow
  7. +3
    April 19 2016 11: 54
    By the way, this car was already described on November 17, 2011, even the photo is the same! http://topwar.ru/8489-boevye-amfibii-dlya-morskoy-pehoty.html
    What is this new?
  8. +2
    April 19 2016 13: 07
    For that kind of money, it’s easier to attach resettable pontoons to the serial bmp with glider lines and an outboard engine. Yes, even a disposable case with a motor + Bradley would cost less.
  9. +2
    April 19 2016 13: 28
    I definitely do not understand how, by cooling the engine with outboard water, it is possible to increase its power by more than three times. Strongly on cranberries, such data is brushed off. And to achieve a speed on the water of 40-50 km / h, decent even for normal boats, with brick contours - a little real task.
  10. +3
    April 19 2016 13: 47
    Video topic:
    1. +2
      April 19 2016 17: 38
      From this video it follows that it is supposed to make a rapid landing without serious fire preparation on the fortified shore. Otherwise, what's the point of keeping landing ships off the horizon? This is only possible if the enemy is much inferior in technical and quantitative terms. In all other situations - utopia. What turns out, cool technique, to drive the Papuans with spears?
  11. 0
    April 19 2016 14: 23
    There are a lot of solutions, they chose the most moronic. They could put the wings, they lifted the body out of the water and forward. They could make a pointed body, put redans on the glider and calmly go dope 3000 hp there. And the most important question is WHY? will throw off 100 meters. And they will quietly get drunk. For helicopters and planes on the drum, what speed on the rocket’s water is still faster.
  12. -1
    April 19 2016 18: 01
    to whom that but to me this product reminded me of the tank "Iron Kaput" from the "pun" laughing hi
    1. 0
      April 19 2016 21: 26
      It remains only to find the "cunning Zusuls". laughing
    2. Dam
      +1
      April 20 2016 00: 32
      Inspired, but what will Kaptsov say? Perfect ship, armadillo, wow!
  13. 0
    April 20 2016 01: 22
    A mixture of a bulldog with a motorcycle, a free idea for developers - you must definitely install mine trawls!
  14. +2
    April 20 2016 05: 40
    Probably an air cushion landing boat, with BMP-3 on board, is more rational and viable.
  15. +1
    April 20 2016 18: 34
    Do I have this one pepelats evokes associations with Warhammer 40k? wassat
  16. 0
    April 23 2016 00: 21
    The speed on the water is certainly quite impressive. But the rest of the Americans followed their favorite path "The best is the enemy of the good" and in the end got "We wanted the best, but it turned out as always" and after all, they don't learn anything super-super-wunderwolf F-35 because the result is the same principle, I think everyone knows ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"