The Russian Defense Ministry commented on US statements about the "dangerous and unprofessional" maneuver of the Su-27

108
Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Major General Igor Konashenkov, commented on the statements of the American side that the Russian fighter pilot Su-27 made a “dangerous and unprofessional” maneuver, approaching the US reconnaissance aircraft on 15 m. RIA News cites statements by Igor Konashenkov:
Information from foreign media about the allegedly dangerous 14 approaching April of the Russian Su-27 aircraft to the American reconnaissance aircraft RC-135 in the sky over the Baltic Sea does not correspond to reality.


The Russian Defense Ministry commented on US statements about the "dangerous and unprofessional" maneuver of the Su-27


According to the official representative of the main defense department of the Russian Federation, an unidentified aerial target over the Baltic was detected by the air defense forces on duty, heading towards the Russian border at high speed. To identify the target, the Su-27 fighter was raised into the air, circling the object and defining it as an American reconnaissance aircraft.

After approaching the Su-27, the American RC-135U changed course and began to move away from the Russian borders.

Igor Konashenkov:
The flight of the Su-27 over the Baltic Sea took place in strict accordance with international rules, there were no abnormal situations.


Recall that the American side announced that it sends a note to the Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with the "incidents". It is not only about the situation with the turn of the RC-135 in the air using the Su-27, but also about the approach of the Su-24 to the destroyer Donald Cook.
  • http://function.mil.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +41
    April 18 2016 06: 25
    It remains only to shrug hands, and to complain about these Russian non-professionals.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +25
      April 18 2016 06: 47
      You can troll the USA and say that our cadets practice their ships and planes laughing
      Already because their statements are not taken seriously.
      1. +3
        April 18 2016 20: 29
        Quote: siberalt
        You can troll the USA and say that our cadets are practicing their skills on their boats and airplanes laughing

        Well, let them not worry too much, only senior students are allowed to work out training attacks on American destroyers! lol
        1. +2
          April 19 2016 03: 08
          Quote: GSH-18
          Quote: siberalt
          You can troll the USA and say that our cadets are practicing their skills on their boats and airplanes laughing

          Well, let’s not worry too much, training attacks on American destroyers are allowed to work out only students senior courses! lol

          what
      2. 0
        April 20 2016 20: 48
        Let Sushki carry hanging sets of diapers in large packaging in the appropriate language and dump near all kinds of Cookies. In bulk.
    3. +10
      April 18 2016 06: 49
      Quote: Teberii
      these Russian non-professionals

      Better to be a "non-professional" sniper than a professional suicide.
      1. +12
        April 18 2016 08: 01
        That's right, "them" from our borders !!!
    4. +9
      April 18 2016 09: 20
      Quote: Teberii
      It remains only to shrug hands, and to complain about these Russian non-professionals.

      Intersno, but what ...... do American destroyers and planes make at our borders? Baltic, tea is not the Caribbean.
      1. +1
        April 18 2016 11: 51
        In in, let them launch scouts in their Caribbean.
        I can imagine what kind of a blast would have begun if our scout had flown regularly in their Caribbean Sea.
        Jackals ...
    5. +4
      April 18 2016 10: 05
      And stsat amperdikosa ... now professionally !!!
      1. +5
        April 18 2016 11: 16
        Quote: Platonitch
        And stsat amperdikosa ... now professionally !!!

        They certainly "scat" (provoke), but with these screams they create Russia in the Western media the image of an inadequate, unpredictable aggressor.
        Everywhere, in Ukraine, in Syria, in the border areas, and Putin is a tyrant and cannibal, and in general the LGBT parade does not allow.
        For what?
        To justify his own aggressive behavior at the right time, right down to the military.
        That is, they make bookmarks for the future.
        The thief shouts: "Stop the thief!"
    6. +1
      April 18 2016 10: 47
      Yes, and let them explain what the reconnaissance plane did at the Russian borders?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +5
        April 18 2016 11: 09
        Quote: Wolverine
        Yes, and let them explain what the reconnaissance plane did at the Russian borders?


        As a joke in the box. The favorite toy of the Russian Aerospace Forces, the destroyer Donald Cook, has entered the Baltic Sea. And again we hear the tearful cries of "professionals" about the non-professional actions of Russian pilots. And then the question is: "If you are such" professionals ", then why are you whining as soon as you see a Russian plane? yells, - Stop the thief!
        Well, as a summary. It's nice that once again they dunked the "hegemon" into their own excrement!
        And I would also like to know how the "proud punks" from Poland behaved at that time, did they shit together in unison with the owners or strictly separately in their own latrine? Judging by the statements of their representative, the stool was long and very liquid.
    7. 0
      April 18 2016 20: 26
      It's not only about the situation with the RC-135 turning in the air with the help of the Su-27, but also about the approach of the Su-24 to the destroyer "Donald Cook"

      Ltd! "Donald Cook"? Again under the distribution of the Russians got? I, I! Zehr good! good laughing
  2. +11
    April 18 2016 06: 27
    By this they hint to you not to go where you should not, otherwise you can accidentally get a muzzle
    1. +4
      April 18 2016 07: 20
      The United States believes that its "exceptional fleet" is welcome anywhere in the world. They will not take this hint. For them, it's just hooliganism.
      1. 0
        April 18 2016 09: 04
        Quote: theadenter
        They will not understand this hint.

        They all understand, but what they understand and what they say are two big differences.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +34
    April 18 2016 06: 30
    As here yesterday on TV I heard "The destroyer Donald Cook, the favorite toy of our Air Force" has arrived. ))))
    1. +47
      April 18 2016 06: 39
      Quote: Wedmak
      As here yesterday on TV I heard "The destroyer Donald Cook, the favorite toy of our Air Force" has arrived. ))))
      1. +24
        April 18 2016 07: 26
        Somehow
        Cooking - (English) flights over the US Navy destroyer "Donald Cook"
        Cooker - (eng. N.) A fan of cookies.
        A professional cookie maker is considered a maker who made 12 flights over the destroyer on April 12.
        1. +1
          April 18 2016 17: 22
          A professional cookie maker is considered a maker who committed 12 cookie 12 April.
    2. +11
      April 18 2016 06: 51
      This is no longer a toy .. This is their fate .. To be in constant tension, to feel the goal of the Russian VKS and Navy.
      1. 0
        April 18 2016 11: 04
        Quote: dmi.pris
        To be in constant tension, to feel the goal of the Russian VKS and Navy

        they seem to like it ... this is what kind of money you can earn on this destroyer - a business project, "extreme cruise" for those who like to crap their pants and play war ... ts. include torpedoes in the program (without a warhead, of course!)
  4. +5
    April 18 2016 06: 31
    It was necessary to answer: the pilot is not a professional, the plane flew dangerously - We had the right to bring him down smile
  5. +12
    April 18 2016 06: 38
    The Russian maneuver may not be professional, but American lies are definitely professional. There are legalized reconnaissance flights over the territories of the USA and Russia. What the hell do they still need at our borders?
    1. +1
      April 18 2016 08: 12
      What the hell do they still need at our borders?


      Apparently, this is already "American roulette" - they will not give them a lull, apparently they have the same convolutions as the stripes on their flag for this and do not think how it might end ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +34
    April 18 2016 06: 41
    No comments! laughing
    1. mad
      +22
      April 18 2016 07: 53
      laughing it remains only the aircraft carrier where to beg for the thread ... but not travel drink it on the go laughing
      1. +3
        April 18 2016 08: 59
        Quote: mad
        it remains only the aircraft carrier where to beg for the thread ...

        ----------------------
        They had a Varyag, they sold it to the Chinese at the price of scrap metal. Now he is in the ranks of the Chinese.
        1. +2
          April 18 2016 09: 42
          Quote: Altona
          Quote: mad
          it remains only the aircraft carrier where to beg for the thread ...

          ----------------------
          They had a Varyag, they sold it to the Chinese at the price of scrap metal. Now he is in the ranks of the Chinese.

          there was also "Ulyanovsk", it was cut into metal unfinished crying
          1. +4
            April 18 2016 09: 55
            Quote: 0255
            there was also "Ulyanovsk

            Quote: Altona
            They had a "Varyag"

            And the key word "BYL" unites "Ulyanovsk" and "Varyag" laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. DPZ
        +1
        April 18 2016 21: 21
        yes laaadno, Sagaidachny probably take their own for an aircraft carrier.
    2. Riv
      +9
      April 18 2016 07: 55
      It’s funny for us, but he’s serious. How are we going to treat them all? After all, you can’t do without euthanazepam.
      1. +3
        April 18 2016 08: 11
        No, it won’t work out, the disease has gone too far (kakly fly to Mars and maybe let them go a bit), although I doubt however ...
      2. +2
        April 18 2016 08: 19
        How are we going to treat them all? After all, you can’t do without euthanazepam.


        Only the guillotine can cope with their diagnosis, otherwise this cannot be treated ..
        1. Riv
          0
          April 18 2016 10: 08
          But euthanazepam is more humane! And the result is the same.
      3. 0
        April 18 2016 10: 46
        Quote: Riv
        It’s funny for us, but he’s serious. How are we going to treat them all? After all, you can’t do without euthanazepam.

        laughing You yourself answered in the first half of your assumption - with euthanasia and we will treat, without pam.
    3. +2
      April 18 2016 10: 54
      Does Ukraine have an aircraft carrier? Apparently somewhere in the Carpathians.
    4. +9
      April 18 2016 11: 10
      Something I do not see guns on an aircraft carrier.
    5. 0
      April 19 2016 00: 37
      Turchinov: if
      ... grandmother had xyz - she would be a grandfather.
      Turchinov, those very fish could not eat our pilots - they are still choking on your words with laughter.
    6. 0
      April 19 2016 23: 37
      The green ones will fuss now, the hungry fish remains.
    7. 0
      April 20 2016 20: 58
      If it were summer, if Ukraine had its own aircraft carrier, if Sushi-Pastor Turchinov flew over it, he would be tired of mourning for the dead sailors ...
  8. +13
    April 18 2016 06: 42
    The American pros will bomb the hospital, the embassy, ​​or the plane will be shot down or shot peacefully. Better not to be professionals.
  9. 0
    April 18 2016 06: 45
    “... the American side announced that it was sending a note to the Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with the“ incidents. ”This is not only about the situation with the RC-135 turning in the air with the help of the Su-27, but also about the approach of the Su-24 to the destroyer "Donald Cook". "

    The base, and at the highest level, then if an incident occurs they will say - we warned you
    1. +2
      April 18 2016 07: 02
      Quote: sa-ag
      then if an incident occurs they will say - we warned you

      Why most of all for Russia, those who live outside of Russia always worry?
    2. 0
      April 18 2016 11: 22
      sa-ag HK Today, 06: 45 New
      "... the American side announced that it was sending a note to the Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with the" incidents. "
      The note came ... on its own, on foot. The guard didn’t let her in ... They didn’t write out the pass, he didn’t let him in ...
    3. 0
      April 18 2016 22: 40
      Quote: sa-ag
      “... the American side announced that it was sending a note to the Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with the“ incidents. ”This is not only about the situation with the RC-135 turning in the air with the help of the Su-27, but also about the approach of the Su-24 to the destroyer "Donald Cook". "

      The base, and at the highest level, then if an incident occurs they will say - we warned you



      They write that Drying made a "barrel" over the scout.
  10. +2
    April 18 2016 06: 47
    And what about American planes and ships in the untouchable caste? Well, probably not handshakes. So we will drive away with our feet.
  11. -8
    April 18 2016 06: 55
    Quote: Wedmak
    As here yesterday on TV I heard "The destroyer Donald Cook, the favorite toy of our Air Force" has arrived. ))))

    It is completely far from the idea that this maneuver was a toy, but ... Dangerous maneuvers unarmed an aircraft is not good from a security point of view, because the Turks have already outlined this topic, and again we are waiting for the provocation and the death of pilots. Pressure on the enemy can also be carried out in other reasonable, safer ways.
    1. aba
      +2
      April 18 2016 07: 12
      Turks have already identified this topic.

      So we designate this topic for our "partners". wink
    2. +5
      April 18 2016 07: 42
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Dangerous maneuvers of an unarmed aircraft

      It’s good that you also see that the aircraft is not armed wink but this ship hints quite distinctly ...

      Or do you think that you can just take it and bring it down unarmede warship independent states in neutral waters, in close proximity to the borders of this state, and then not shy away from every "glance" when approaching the territorial borders? And God forbid if these boundaries are violated?

      Or maybe you think that the exceptional ones are so exceptional that they have the right not to change course from an approaching aircraft independent state when approaching the borders of this state? It seems to me that the term "dangerous maneuvering" refers just to the exclusive, not understanding the purpose of the approach of the aircraft and not changing course in advance, until the approach.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      April 18 2016 09: 36
      You are somewhat right, you need to be prepared that they will start shooting at ours. They are already preparing the ground for excuses "non-professionals", "dangerous rapprochement." And then we will "but who knew", "yes, we are without ammunition", "now we will fly accompanied by." I hope Turkey has reminded that we have no friends.
      And pressure on the enemy should always be, only without a chance for this enemy to force us.
      1. +1
        April 18 2016 10: 06
        I'm afraid that even if
        "now we will fly accompanied by"
        , and just to fly - they will still say:
        Su-27 made a "dangerous and unprofessional" maneuver
        ... Here it is, in the eyes of the mattresses and black becomes white. And all sorts of "Romanians" believe them and look into their mouths.
      2. 0
        April 20 2016 21: 06
        Fly with full ammunition. And only in this way. If necessary, warning fire on the course with a significant lead.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      April 18 2016 10: 52
      Quote: avg-mgn
      It is completely far from the idea that this maneuver was a toy, but ... Dangerous maneuvers of an unarmed military aircraft are not good from a security point of view, because the Turks have already outlined this topic, and again we are waiting for the pilots to provoke and die. Pressure on the enemy can also be carried out in other reasonable, safer ways.

      Such maneuvers are carried out everywhere, both near our shores by our fighters and attack aircraft, and by American ones when approaching closer than necessary by our aircraft to the shores of the United States. It's just that they are playing to the audience, this whole circus in the media is aimed at the Balts, and other ESovtsev. Constant howls about bombers off the coast of Britain and the Scandinavian countries, the coastal zone of the United States - it's all show. These flights are recorded in the protocol, are planned and take at least 20 years, just before they were a little less.
    6. 0
      April 18 2016 13: 49
      Quote: avg-mgn
      ... Dangerous maneuvers of an unarmed military aircraft are not good from a security point of view,

      That's right.
  12. +5
    April 18 2016 07: 01
    The time has long passed when they could fly and walk on the sea wherever they wanted uncontrollably. It's time to feel that Russia is not only alive, but also ready for all Western dirty tricks.
  13. +4
    April 18 2016 07: 11
    I can imagine how many people quite rub their hands upon hearing the news of the interception.
  14. -16
    April 18 2016 07: 17
    Quote: aba
    So we designate this topic for our "partners".


    and again we are waiting for the provocation and the death of the pilots.


    They answered the Turks with tomatoes, how will you answer the mattresses?
    1. aba
      +1
      April 18 2016 07: 33
      how to respond to the mattresses?

      That is, are you sure that the mattresses on our shores will bring down our own plane ?!
      1. 0
        April 20 2016 16: 45
        a question to a question? - :)
    2. +6
      April 18 2016 07: 36
      Quote: avg-mgn
      They answered the Turks with tomatoes, how will you answer the mattresses?

      The Turks have not answered anything yet. But they made it clear that now the time for words is over and they will not get off with tomatoes. God forbid them to take at least half a step across the Syrian border towards the VKS base ...

      Isn't it difficult to follow the logic? But for some reason, our comrades from neighboring countries are very worried about Turkish tomatoes. Don't worry too much.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +8
      April 18 2016 08: 25
      A typical comment under the Romanian flag!
    5. 0
      April 20 2016 01: 14
      Rutskoi said, we will sink the "Cook."
    6. 0
      April 20 2016 21: 09
      Worry about your tomatoes
  15. +1
    April 18 2016 07: 51
    Quote: avg-mgn
    It is completely far from the idea that this maneuver was a toy, but ... Dangerous maneuvers of an unarmed military aircraft are not good from a security point of view, because the Turks have already outlined this topic, and again we are waiting for the pilots to provoke and die. Pressure on the enemy can also be carried out in other reasonable, safer ways.

    There are no other reasonable ways to drive Americans away from our borders.
  16. Riv
    0
    April 18 2016 07: 54
    And our one flies up and says: "BREAK!" The Americans are unhappy, of course. The pilots were prevented from doing what they loved.
  17. +6
    April 18 2016 07: 56
    Nehru to rub against our borders.
  18. +4
    April 18 2016 07: 58
    It's not just about the situation with the RC-135 turning in the air with the help of the Su-27! That is, it was necessary to apologize and provide a corridor ??? Do you want bald horseradish? am
  19. -14
    April 18 2016 07: 59
    Quote: sergeyzzz
    There are no other reasonable ways. drive Americans away from our borders.
    how to play war. (sitting on the couch)! Forgot how they unanimously wrote on the site "Eternal memory of the hero" when the Turks filled up the DRYING ??? Oh well. There without weapons, here drive away without weapons?
    1. +3
      April 18 2016 08: 04
      Quote: avg-mgn
      drive away?

      In your case - "fromnogyaethose" wink Or what do you have with the flag?
      1. +1
        April 18 2016 08: 30
        * drive away (sorry for the typo).
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      April 18 2016 12: 26
      A reasonable way to sink a ship or something, or displace it "in bulk" ??)) Something is not offered alternative reasonable ways. This has always been done before and will be done after. Demonstration of the flag is called - by the way, American fun ... And since the stakes are high, sometimes people die, but they do not die in vain, believe me ...
  20. vmo
    +4
    April 18 2016 08: 01
    Quote: engineer74
    No comments! laughing


    Not distant, he is not distant, anika warrior, Ukrainian mother.
    1. 0
      April 18 2016 09: 11
      On the one hand, it's funny, but on the other, we must not forget that it was he who arranged the bloody nightmare in the Southeast ...
  21. +2
    April 18 2016 08: 39
    Well, on whom to train if not on partners and friends, they visit us, and we: "Friends, how glad we are to you," and suddenly go home, and why not to our airfield, or to the port, and even resentment, that's respect friends.
  22. +2
    April 18 2016 08: 59
    I think. American sailors will gradually get used to it, and it will become just a good tradition of the Russian Aerospace Forces - to send greetings to their favorite Cook on Cosmonautics Day. Without any military overtones. drinks
  23. +2
    April 18 2016 08: 59
    Unidentifiable target, does that mean with the transponder turned off?
    1. 0
      April 20 2016 21: 14
      Quite right. Has anyone ever seen a high speed scout with a transponder on? It's like soft-boiled boots.
  24. +2
    April 18 2016 09: 00
    Yes, all this is nonsense. You fly near the borders of a non-banana republic, you will be intercepted. It would be strange if he had not been intercepted, the highest logic of Fashington - "White swans are intercepted - Russia is to blame, we intercept the scout - again Russia is to blame. You don't get on for every sneeze. The provocateurs are fucking. And also crybabies, almost, the whole world is crying - Russians are offended by them.
  25. +4
    April 18 2016 09: 03
    "Russians don't fly, our boys are very upset." Apparently the message is this. The psychophysical state of the US sailors and pilots is falling sharply. And the RC-135 is such a sneaky plane. I still served, they flew near our borders with angry birds, sorry Black birds, SR-71.
  26. +1
    April 18 2016 09: 31
    And why is it always qualified as "non-professional"? Well, there, “daring”, “dangerous”, “defiant”, “provocative”, “aggressive” - that's okay, of course, an adrenaline crisis. But our flyers demonstrate their professional suitability at the level, IMHO. Only the notes are alarming - the Turkish precedent should not be forgotten, I think.
  27. +6
    April 18 2016 09: 37
    In the 1950s - early 1960s, American reconnaissance aircraft were generally shot down, reconnaissance flights could end extremely sadly for American pilots soldier Interestingly, then the United States did not accuse Soviet pilots of non-professionalism? laughing
    1. 0
      April 20 2016 21: 18
      ... In the direction of the state border from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, an unidentified plane was approaching. After meeting with an air force interceptor, the plane withdrew towards ... the sea. Korean War times
  28. DPN
    0
    April 18 2016 10: 36
    Do not fucking do adversaries near our shores, as we can and fly. We had to fry them a little with engines.
  29. -1
    April 18 2016 10: 37
    Quote: aba
    how to respond to the mattresses?

    That is, are you sure that the mattresses on our shores will bring down our own plane ?!

    Dear, if you do not read the comments, do not understand the essence of individual statements. Here is what we were talking about:

    Quote: Wedmak
    As here yesterday on TV I heard "The destroyer has arrived Donald Cook, our Air Force favorite toy. " ))))


    avg-mgn
    It is completely far from the idea that this maneuver was a toy, but ... Dangerous maneuvers of an unarmed military aircraft are not good from a security point of view, because the Turks have already outlined this topic, and again we are waiting for the pilots to provoke and die. Pressure on the enemy can also be carried out in other reasonable, safer ways.

    Quote: aba
    So we designate this topic for our "partners".


    avg-mgn
    and again we are waiting for the provocation and the death of the pilots.
    They answered the Turks with tomatoes, how will you answer the mattresses?

    Quote: sergeyzzz
    There are no other reasonable ways to drive Americans away from our borders.


    avg-mgn
    how to play war. (sitting on the couch)! Forgot how they unanimously wrote on the site "Eternal memory of the hero" when the Turks filled up the DRYING ??? Oh well. There, without weapons, here without weapons, are we driving away?

    Continue?
    1. +2
      April 18 2016 11: 05
      Quote: avg-mgn
      how to play war. (sitting on the couch)! Forgot how they unanimously wrote on the site "Eternal memory of the hero" when the Turks filled up the DRYING ??? Oh well. There, without weapons, here without weapons, are we driving away?

      what Do you think this ship is accompanied only by these unarmed aircraft? - there coastal complexes highlight the situation and perhaps a couple of attack aircraft are on duty nearby with full ammunition (or bombers carry out planned overflights), although those anti-ship missiles that are on the coast and ships of the Baltic Fleet will be enough for more than a dozen Cooks.
  30. +2
    April 18 2016 11: 16
    it was necessary to launch two Su-27s to intercept and take these ears into a box and blow them properly on the left and right, so that the hunt would disappear to listen to our borders laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  31. +1
    April 18 2016 11: 28
    During the existence of the Union, such situations probably happened often and the states did not squeal as they do now that again these Russians violated something there. And if they yell, it means they are afraid and beware. And it appears that Russia is doing everything right, because you don't need to climb where you don't need to. And then they took the habit of walking near the borders of Russia. Oh, how you do not like when they are put in place.
    1. 0
      April 20 2016 21: 24
      The drunken Boria and his team completely dismissed them. The quicker the labeled army ditched. The production of technology. Now we have to learn again, get up still when we appear. It takes time to restore reflexes.
  32. 0
    April 18 2016 11: 44
    Quote: Teberii
    It remains only to shrug hands, and to complain about these Russian non-professionals.

    Send them on with a recommendation to fly and swim closer to your home ... And stop making excuses (!), I'm tired of damn ...
  33. 0
    April 18 2016 11: 47
    Quote: insular
    Quote: avg-mgn
    drive away?

    In your case - "fromnogyaethose" wink Or what do you have with the flag?


    You are no longer a beginner on this forum, but ask a question about the flag. I’ve already risen a hundred times and there were a lot of admins Bullshit or a programmer incorrectly determines the IP address, respectively, the flag of Honoras tomorrow can proudly develop on your avatar.
    Sincerely, Ural-megaphone subscriber.
  34. +1
    April 18 2016 11: 51
    There is a psychological program to "demonize" Russians in the eyes of the "progressive public". Of course, the entry of such a ship as "D.Kuk" into the ports of Klaipeda, Liepaja, Riga will be accompanied by the approach of all supporting infrastructure to Moscow and St. Petersburg.
    So, on the eve of the D. Cook's call in Lithuania, Russian saboteurs were looking for the coast, it was reported that Russian helicopters violated the "territory" of Lithuania.
    At the same time, on our part, through official diplomatic and military channels, there is complete silence, no reaction to the provocative and Russophobic policy pursued by the US military far from its territory.
  35. +1
    April 18 2016 12: 05
    Law of the sea. If I don't like something somewhere, I just don't go there, I don't fly and I don't go.
  36. 0
    April 18 2016 13: 30
    Not amer to judge the professionalism of our pilots. Himself for a long time only on simulators "fight".
  37. +2
    April 18 2016 17: 30
    I would venture to suggest that when an overfed duck watches the flight of a swift, he is also horrified by his unprofessionalism and risky maneuvers.
  38. 0
    April 18 2016 17: 52
    what do they all need, not how they can not understand that it is not damn good to climb to us!
  39. 0
    April 18 2016 20: 48
    at least stop flying straight ... you just have to take off, someone immediately has psychosis, neurosis and diarrhea ...)))
  40. DPZ
    0
    April 18 2016 21: 22
    on D. Cook it is time to bake loaves, so that Russians, according to all traditions, are welcomed with bread and salt.
  41. 0
    April 18 2016 22: 55
    Closer 100 km from the border of this creature fly "nizya, ay-ya-ay". Know about this unspoken rule. They know that the VKS / Air Defense will "pat" the head with a bream, but they still climb. Stoned provocateurs
  42. +2
    April 19 2016 06: 23
    As far as can be judged from information from the media, our plane made a barrel over the American "firing". And this aerobatics is done, in my opinion, in case of victory in an air battle. Well, where do the Americans know such subtleties, when of all and achievements: the bombing of Yugoslavia, the shooting of weddings in Afghanistan and the destruction of hospitals in Iraq.
    1. 0
      April 20 2016 01: 41
      Do not tell me then, where such "achievements" have been demonstrated by the Russians, well, let's say over the past 25 years. In Syria, right?. There our aviation encountered a powerful air enemy and won a crushing victory over the enemy aviation?
  43. 0
    April 19 2016 07: 52
    Learn how to fly clowns, do not complain. Your wretched fliers of the hospital are bombing, these are professionals, no words, some thoughts and those obscene.
  44. +1
    April 19 2016 08: 07
    If the Americans squealed .... So the task is completed perfectly! The goal is achieved!
    soldier
  45. +2
    April 19 2016 12: 32
    A task. After the first flight of the SU-24 over Cook, 27 sailors managed, after the second more than 40. How much fertilizer will the destroyer's crew produce when the SU-24 flight with full armament passes over it?
  46. +2
    April 19 2016 14: 59
    Donald Cook soon cries out from such surprises.
  47. 0
    April 20 2016 15: 04
    Russians warn three times. 2 already been
    1. 0
      April 20 2016 23: 13
      About two warnings, kindly enlighten. This is where, when and how did it happen?
  48. 0
    April 20 2016 23: 33
    To comprehend the whole situation, just swap the places of Russia and the United States - "RUSSIAN RECEIVING AIRCRAFT WAS INTERCEPTED BY US FIGHTERS NEAR FLORIDA COAST! A US Air Force pilot was dangerously and unprofessionally maneuvering near a Russian intelligence officer!" When something like this appears in the media, then it will be possible to talk about who determines the tone of international politics.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"