Military Review

VKS expect the arrival of the first samples of the C-500 in the near future

93
The Russian Space Forces will soon receive the first samples of the newest C-500 air defense system, RIA News message from the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Aerospace Forces, Victor Gumenny.




This Gumenny said on the channel "Russia 24". According to him, "development work on the C-500 AAMS is now ending."

The publication notes that the ground-to-air anti-aircraft missile system, the C-500, is a universal long-range and high-altitude interception system with an increased potential for missile defense.

"Perspective ZRS can hit not only ballistic, but also aerodynamic targets (airplanes, helicopters, other aerial targets), as well as cruise missiles," the report said.

Help Agency: “The C-500 has a hit radius of 600 kilometers and will be able to detect and simultaneously hit up to 10 ballistic supersonic targets flying at speeds up to 7 kilometers per second. The ZRS will also be able to hit the combat units of hypersonic missiles. In terms of its characteristics, the C-500 will significantly outperform the Triumph standing on the C-400 and its American rival Patriot Advanced Capability-3. ”
Photos used:
RIA News
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Muvka
    Muvka April 16 2016 11: 19
    +2
    And here is our missile defense system in time. It’s only a pity that there are a lot of such complexes ... At such moments you regret that the country is so big :)
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 April 16 2016 11: 22
      +19
      Quote: Muvka
      .. At such moments, you regret that the country is so big :)

      And if she was small, then she could be destroyed much faster! And on a large territory it is much easier to locate these complexes unnoticed.
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 11: 27
        +7
        flying at a speed of up to 7 kilometers per second.

        It turns out in speed and Minutmen-3 and Trident-2 will be able to intercept ...
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz April 16 2016 11: 30
          +40
          It turns out in speed and Minutmen-3 and Trident-2 will be able to intercept ...

          You know, it’s a tradition in the West to overestimate the performance characteristics of your weapons. Our situation is strictly opposite bully
          1. cniza
            cniza April 16 2016 12: 40
            +9
            Quote: Wiruz
            It turns out in speed and Minutmen-3 and Trident-2 will be able to intercept ...

            You know, it’s a tradition in the West to overestimate the performance characteristics of your weapons. Our situation is strictly opposite bully


            That's for sure, boasting them always failed.
            1. Throw
              Throw April 16 2016 17: 50
              +10
              “If the Americans say they will make a hypersonic missile, they will make it.
              If the Russians say they will make a hypersonic missile .. then they have already made it. " bully

              With regards to C-500, that is, I strongly suspect that the complex not only works on missiles and heads, but also on satellites in low orbits ... wink
              1. smershxnumx
                smershxnumx April 16 2016 19: 13
                +2
                Colleague!!! As our foreman-veteran used to say: "About the war - just in a whisper" !!! smile smile smile
                And the satellites ... They are so different - low, high ... fellow
              2. shans2
                shans2 April 16 2016 19: 39
                +1
                in fact, it was said almost officially, moreover, even with 400 there is an opportunity to reach up to 185 km of altitude in low orbit, but spy satellites usually fly at least 220.
                1. Throw
                  Throw April 16 2016 21: 42
                  -1
                  Well, low orbits are conventionally considered to be up to 1,5 thousand km, but our Caliber recently flew only 300 ... wink
                  1. Voyager
                    Voyager April 17 2016 09: 43
                    +1
                    Export and flies. Modification for the internal user was long-range)
                  2. Wiruz
                    Wiruz April 17 2016 14: 14
                    0
                    Well, low orbits conditionally up to 1,5 thousand km are considered

                    FAQ ??? ISS, damn it, flies at an altitude of about 400 km! How and what are you going to shoot down an object at an altitude of 1,5 thousand km ???

                    "Caliber" recently flew only 300

                    Either the Ukrainians, or those with "no mind, no fantasy" spoke about the range of the non-export Caliber of 300 km. After all, it was immediately clear that the maximum flight range of 3m14 would be no less than 1500 km. Back in 2012, the values ​​of 2600 and 1600 km surfaced.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Karlovar
            Karlovar April 16 2016 14: 07
            +2
            Probably yes! If we take into account the laws of the conspiracy theological genre, this statement may indicate that the development has already been completed, the tests (in secret mode) are also possible, and the capacities for the series have been prepared, and even the first production complexes may have already gone ...
          4. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre April 16 2016 21: 42
            +8
            It's funny. The interception range of 600 km exceeds the threshold under the INF Treaty. If it works without violations, let's make air defense missiles up to 5000 km and with a "shock core" of a couple of tons. At about and with a "shock core" divided into 4-10 parts
            wassat
            It will be cool defense.
      2. Error
        Error April 16 2016 11: 28
        +5
        I agree pride overwhelms! About Petriot, they might not have talked about .....
      3. noWAR
        noWAR April 16 2016 12: 30
        +1
        And why minus a person?
      4. PKK
        PKK April 16 2016 12: 40
        0
        And why is the Eagle emblem with its wings down on the gates? We need to calculate who lowered our Eagle's wings and punish them roughly so that they would remember for a long time.
    2. karpah
      karpah April 16 2016 11: 40
      -24%
      Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...
      1. Cartalon
        Cartalon April 16 2016 11: 59
        0
        This thing seems to be for the Moscow missile defense system, so your nephew can sleep peacefully
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 12: 04
          +8
          Quote: Cartalon
          This thing seems to be for the Moscow missile defense system, so your nephew can sleep peacefully

          Moscow missile defense A-135/235 fixed system, S-500 will be a mobile complex and its deployment is clearly not limited to Moscow.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 April 16 2016 14: 59
            +1
            If you want to buy 10 divisions, then most likely it will be limited to Moscow - as an addition to A 235.
      2. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 11: 59
        +14
        Quote: karpah
        Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...

        Do you really believe that the F-35 is 100% invisible? Read on Wikipedia how the S-300/400 works. In parallel, several radars work; data from several radars (radars of different frequency ranges) are combined and displayed on the screen at the command point. How does a stealth plane hide from a radar such as a meter range? Or, for example, the A-50U radar and the A-100 being developed (the A-100, by the way, will be able to give target designation including S-400/500).
        MiG-31BM and Su-35S (alongside the radar on the Su-35S there is an optical station allowing to detect fighters for 50 kilometers) can also give target designation by ground-based air defense systems. Thus, a combat space is formed with dozens of radar stations that form a radar field in which any unobtrusive targets are visible.
        1. karpah
          karpah April 16 2016 18: 33
          -15%
          I will tell you a little confidential information that the top of the Russian army and government really know well. At night, F-22s fly freely over the Alawite enclave of Syria and over Latakia, where the S-400 is located. They flew more in order to demonstrate their capabilities. Naturally, they weren’t noticed, but for a gangster force and to tease the air defense calculations, they opened the bomb compartment for a few seconds, became visible and then again became invisible. None of the parties, for their reasons, made this incident public. Here is such a situation.
          Brothers, chur not minus ...
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 19: 14
            +4
            Quote: karpah
            I will tell you a little confidential information that the top of the Russian army and government really know well. At night, F-22s fly freely over the Alawite enclave of Syria and over Latakia, where the S-400 is located. They flew more in order to demonstrate their capabilities. Naturally, they weren’t noticed, but for a gangster force and to tease the air defense calculations, they opened the bomb compartment for a few seconds, became visible and then again became invisible. None of the parties, for their reasons, made this incident public. Here is such a situation.
            Brothers, chur not minus ...

            Well, of course, the F-22 has an EPR of 0 ... Don’t carry any bullshit, stealth technology gives an advantage in aerial combat, in the form of a shorter detection range of your enemy’s aircraft radar (the aircraft’s radar is much less powerful compared to ground-based radars and airborne radars of AWACS ) That's all. With ground-based air defense systems that have significantly more powerful radar stations + there are several of these same radar stations and each operates in a different range, this focus will not work, but radars need more energy to detect targets with a small EPR, but this problem is solved by more powerful generators.
            You still say that if you put emphasis on the ground F-22 to the S-400 radars, they will not detect it. After all, the F-22 moves to a parallel world, so the radar radiation passes through it.
            1. karpah
              karpah April 16 2016 19: 45
              -2
              Dear, this fact is well known to the leadership of the Russian Air Force, and therefore the family would not have made it public. if you have the opportunity, ask
              1. Lt. Air Force stock
                Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 19: 48
                +3
                Quote: karpah
                Dear, this fact is well known to the leadership of the Russian Air Force, and therefore the family would not have made it public. if you have the opportunity, ask

                Well, you know better from Israel what the leadership of the Russian Air Force is aware ...
              2. shans2
                shans2 April 16 2016 19: 55
                +3
                everyone has long known that the power of Israel, like the United States, can be blown up, you can PR and lie, but Lebanon 2006 showed how a bunch of hesbolls fucked you, you had to turn off the entire military operation and not go deep into Lebanon, otherwise didn’t come out ... All that modern ATGMs and grenade launchers had to be put up .... Now that Hezbollah is busy in Syria, you are hatching your plans for Lebanon again, building provocations, trying to blame terrorism and so on, don’t break off, Putin never sleeping laughing Mice died there somewhere in the backyards? will not come? but the Arctic fox can come ...
                1. karpah
                  karpah April 16 2016 20: 28
                  -1
                  And what's the point of lying to me? F-22 Alas, we don’t have and never will, the Americans don’t sell it to anyone, the production line is closed ...
                  I just shared unpublished information regarding the first real interaction of the F-22 and S-400, I thought it would be interesting to you ...
                  I understand that this is an unpleasant truth for you, but why pour a tub of dirt on my country and people and minus the same
                  1. Lt. Air Force stock
                    Lt. Air Force stock April 16 2016 21: 26
                    +2
                    Quote: karpah
                    I just shared unpublished information regarding the first real interaction of the F-22 and S-400, I thought it would be interesting to you ...
                    I understand that this is an unpleasant truth for you, but why pour a tub of dirt on my country and people and minus the same

                    Without objective evidence, this is only your speculation.
                  2. pv1005
                    pv1005 April 17 2016 04: 29
                    +1
                    Quote: karpah
                    And what's the point of lying to me? F-22 Alas, we don’t have and never will, the Americans don’t sell it to anyone, the production line is closed ...
                    I just shared unpublished information regarding the first real interaction of the F-22 and S-400, I thought it would be interesting to you ...
                    I understand that this is an unpleasant truth for you, but why pour a tub of dirt on my country and people and minus the same

                    From your lips, it sounds like, "I'll tell you in your ear, just don't tell anyone. I swear by my mom."
              3. dauria
                dauria April 16 2016 22: 23
                +2
                Dear, this fact is well known to the leadership of the Russian Air Force, and therefore the family would not have made it public.


                Lord, sons of Israel, is it really your like that? Take care of the honor of your flag. It seems to be a competent nation. request
            2. igor.borov775
              igor.borov775 April 17 2016 09: 19
              0
              How Interesting. For a long time there were no tales here, Do not tell my hooves one hero spoke, Yes the S-400 appeared and that’s it, I’m insulting that the S3SA air forces are being shown as idiots, F-22 appeared and flew home, The order was
              in a live broadcast "Any target carrying a threat is subject to destruction, This is an order, And here is a fairy tale of invisibility, Open bomb bays, Yes !!
          2. shans2
            shans2 April 16 2016 19: 44
            +1
            you have noble storytellers there, the whole world Jews feed fairy tales, mice are torn)))
          3. activator
            activator April 16 2016 21: 14
            +2
            Quote: karpah
            At night, F-22s fly freely over the Alawite enclave of Syria and over Latakia, where the S-400 is located. They flew more in order to demonstrate their capabilities. Naturally, they weren’t noticed, but for force bandits

            I, too, will share confidential information that f22 were noticed when taking off with calculations from 400, but they pretended that they didn’t notice anyway to fight with Russia America is not going to over Syria. And it makes no sense to scream about it to the whole world. , but you have the opportunity then ask about it at the Russian General Staff.
      3. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 April 16 2016 12: 05
        +2
        karpah IL
        Dear, and where does it all go, Chef, and F-35? Does Israel have
        Protection against intercontinental ballistic missiles located outside the atmosphere - “Hets-3” system,
        2. Protection against long-range missiles and ICBM warheads entering the atmosphere - the Hets-2 system,
        3. Protection against cruise missiles, medium-range tactical missiles and long-range artillery shells - the David Sling and Patriot PAC-3 systems,
        4. Protection against short-range missiles and mortar shells - the Iron Dome system.
        and thank God.
        And in Russia, the S-500. And what does not suit you?
        1. activator
          activator April 16 2016 12: 18
          +9
          Quote: Kos_kalinki9
          And in Russia, the S-500. And what does not suit you?
          So maybe it's not banter, but a funeral cry for a nephew ... crying Mourn with you karpah hi
        2. karpah
          karpah April 16 2016 18: 38
          -8
          The S-300 is not satisfied in Iran, and if oil is cheaper, the S-500 will be there
          1. question
            question April 16 2016 22: 22
            +1
            If the S-400 is deceived, then how can the S-300 interfere?
      4. kepmor
        kepmor April 16 2016 12: 09
        +8
        You’re kidding, well, well ... let's see who will be the last to laugh!
        By the way, no one is going to use the S-500 against this "wunderwafele" - no one is going to use the F-35, it's too "great honor" for this iron! For him and the S-300 dryers will be enough "for the eyes and ears"!
        But dissuade nephew from "deliberate suicide" ......
      5. noWAR
        noWAR April 16 2016 12: 33
        +5
        Quote: karpah
        Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...

        C. You mean, heartfelt? Russia is not Arabs, it will not work. And tell my nephew. Go -
      6. AID.S
        AID.S April 16 2016 13: 08
        +4
        Quote: karpah
        Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...

        And you give such a leaflet to the tribe, let it take a little photoshoot, remove the inappropriate symbolism, learn the text and store it in the inner pocket, there will be nothing to fear. Yes, and let it be distributed to others
      7. Termit1309
        Termit1309 April 16 2016 13: 23
        +13
        Yes, and H.R. with him is a nephew. The last one? Send another one to the dentist studying.
      8. lelikas
        lelikas April 16 2016 14: 39
        +4
        Quote: karpah
        Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...

        Let the wrestling bridge begin to do in the morning - they say helmets break your neck! laughing
      9. The comment was deleted.
      10. bulvas
        bulvas April 16 2016 15: 59
        +2
        Quote: karpah
        Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...


        For the F-35, there have long been Buki, Shell, s-300, 400

      11. The comment was deleted.
      12. the villain
        the villain April 17 2016 01: 28
        +1
        Quote: karpah
        F-35 - flying iron, child prodigy and saw dough ...
    3. KnightRider
      KnightRider April 16 2016 11: 41
      +4
      Quote: Muvka
      At such moments, you regret that the country is so big :)

      And I do not regret a single drop ... Moreover, if our country suddenly grows into new territories (as in the case of the Crimea), I will only be glad, and if you dream like that, then about the restoration of Russia within the borders of the USSR smile
    4. da Vinci
      da Vinci April 16 2016 12: 21
      0
      The country is big! smile
    5. Jurkovs
      Jurkovs April 16 2016 14: 23
      0
      And the whole country does not need to be covered, the positioning areas of the Strategic Nuclear Forces and the Navy are enough.
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 16 2016 11: 21
    +3
    Ohhhh! What a news good although expected .. you can drive away a beer, for the glory of the Russian Weapons drinks what would all the designers "grow together" there.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 April 16 2016 11: 41
      +2
      you can drive and a beer

      Under this news it is possible and stronger. drinks
      1. PKK
        PKK April 16 2016 12: 38
        -3
        No guys, blunt it is outdated, now instead of it dry starvation.
      2. PKK
        PKK April 16 2016 12: 38
        0
        No guys, blunt it is outdated, now instead of it dry starvation.
  3. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 16 2016 11: 25
    0
    I wonder what kind of "peepers" the new system has?
    On TV, as usual, cars with missiles will be shown, although all of it works only in combination.
    1. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 April 16 2016 11: 38
      +3
      This is shown on TV because the vast majority of these peepers are not understood, and the launchers are clear to everyone)
  4. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky April 16 2016 11: 27
    +1
    Oh, take it easy! Our "partners" have not yet had time to move away from the news of the readiness of the serial production of the Armata, and now another "gift"! good laughing
  5. Error
    Error April 16 2016 11: 33
    +1
    Quote: Barracuda
    Ohhhh! What a news good although expected .. you can drive away a beer, for the glory of the Russian Weapons drinks what would all the designers "grow together" there.

    Wait a minute, and that the idea is not bad with us while Saturday should be honored to stir up)
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 16 2016 11: 37
      -5
      Quote: Error
      Quote: Barracuda
      Ohhhh! What a news good although expected .. you can drive away a beer, for the glory of the Russian Weapons drinks what would all the designers "grow together" there.

      Wait a minute, and that the idea is not bad with us while Saturday should be honored to stir up)

      Here would be less to us of such people who cannot live without beer or vodka. Now, if everyone, like me, would not drink at all ... that would be a country ...
      1. karpah
        karpah April 16 2016 11: 41
        -4
        Then it would be a non-Russian country
        1. tanit
          tanit April 16 2016 11: 52
          +2
          Quote: karpah
          Then it would be a non-Russian country

          Tell me, where and when was the "Russian country"? Empire - and that was "Russian".
          Kievan Rus? To tire your brain with a list of non-"Russian" tribes, or will you demand your own brain (although, as soon as possible, memory, you learned somewhere)? laughing
        2. Tibidokh
          Tibidokh April 16 2016 13: 06
          0
          Quote: karpah
          Then it would be a non-Russian country

          You would use your walnut, aka the brain, on another forum. On the "Censor", for example.
          And then your child will come in to read dad's / mother's account on VO, and there only stupidity, vulgarity and nastiness about Russians are there. Disappointed in you ... Say, the parent is completely stupid, why should I listen to him ?! And grow up like this. Do you need it ?!
      2. lis-ik
        lis-ik April 16 2016 15: 20
        0
        Then whiners and pessimists increased, although I am a supporter of moderate use, but in decent quantities.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  6. tanit
    tanit April 16 2016 11: 41
    0
    We’re falling behind ... Won Gene Brandy spit down helicopters back in 1979 (paper book, Adventure World series).
    And you are a breakthrough, a breakthrough. I am ashamed. Teach materiel. (As gray-haired graduates of Tashkent not only tank schools say. Well, as they say, so they studied. And how they studied, so they say.)
  7. ded100
    ded100 April 16 2016 11: 41
    +2
    We are waiting on time! good
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 16 2016 11: 49
      -1
      Interestingly, and in the near future how many years.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets April 16 2016 13: 05
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        Interestingly, and in the near future how many years.

        R&D work will end, then flight design tests will begin, then state testing. If everything goes well for another three years. Since, after R&D, you need to create a complex in hardware.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 16 2016 15: 00
          0
          I think this is another 5 years minimum.
          1. Amurets
            Amurets April 16 2016 15: 51
            0
            Quote: Vadim237
            I think this is another 5 years minimum.

            The AVTOCAD and Compass programs help to perform design and layout work much faster, but how many mistakes will be made during the design and how they will affect the throw and flight design tests, you need to look. Unfortunately, not a single product in the prototypes without errors manages.
  8. antiexpert
    antiexpert April 16 2016 11: 45
    +1
    So what, now the new nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize is not the S-400, but the S-500?
  9. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 April 16 2016 11: 49
    +5
    "... At such moments you regret that the country is so big ..."
    Move to a smaller one! There you will be cozy, comfortable, but by no means safe ... "Start" in the Baltic countries, it is cozy there: the surf rustles, the ever cloudy sky, frigid women and not very large fish .. And, I, I will go to smoke perches: 1,8 kg + 2,1 () and I'll split my wife for an elastic ass! I understand that I got the whole site, but these "brutes" are real, there is nowhere to put them ... I will soon calm down, the ice in Hunty wrinkled ... angry
    1. Muvka
      Muvka April 16 2016 11: 52
      0
      Quote: ALABAY45
      "... At such moments you regret that the country is so big ..."
      Move to a smaller one! There you will be cozy, comfortable, but by no means safe ... "Start" in the Baltic countries, it is cozy there: the surf rustles, the ever cloudy sky, frigid women and not very large fish .. And, I, I will go to smoke perches: 1,8 kg + 2,1 () and pinch my wife for an elastic ass!

      You have some kind of perception problems. I am glad that we have such a country. But the problem is to surround the border, because she is very big. Or do you think that serving 10 km of the border, that 10000 km is the same thing?
      1. ALABAY45
        ALABAY45 April 16 2016 12: 05
        +1
        Well, you won't please! You, did not ask the question: before the collapse of the USSR, the total length of the borders ?! It was necessary to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, I'm not talking about the "Baltic crap" to furnish "... Now, all the" dark "republics have escaped to freedom ... , not in the first ...
        1. Muvka
          Muvka April 16 2016 12: 16
          +2
          People, what did you eat today? Are you not familiar with SARCASM? I did not expect such a reaction ...
          1. ALABAY45
            ALABAY45 April 16 2016 12: 26
            0
            In the morning, sandwiches with butter and lightly smoked pike caviar, scrambled eggs made from 6 homemade eggs, aromatic ground coffee with "village" cream and "Borodino" bread, as "toasts"! Now, regarding SARKAZM ... Yes, no, I don’t want to discuss, overeat repeat From today, I'm on vacation, so that the recipes are yet to come ... good
            1. Olga Metel
              Olga Metel April 16 2016 13: 11
              +1
              Guys! Well, do not bully out of business! Tea is not RT? I wasn’t on the censor - I don’t know - I’m saying right away. request
            2. guzik007
              guzik007 April 16 2016 19: 26
              0
              You are terry poacher, Alabay. Fish has already gone to spawn. Here you wait, they will take you for the gills of the inspector. Or maybe you're the inspector yourself?: =)
  10. Alexander S.
    Alexander S. April 16 2016 12: 13
    -5
    Zdorovo.A suitable rockets for the complex again in a few years will give out?
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 16 2016 22: 22
      +2
      Quote: Alexander S.
      And will suitable rockets for the complex be returned again in a few years?

      "Prototyap" such a long-range missile defense system has already been tested on the S-400.
      Adopted in 2007, the S-400 ... complex has a radius of destruction of up to 400 km (in the variant with a long-range missile, adopted in 2015, which will be used on the S-500). Height - from 5 m (!) To 185 km (!).

      Here is her "darling" and bring to mind to hit the VC at D = 600 km.
  11. Mestny
    Mestny April 16 2016 12: 14
    +3
    Quote: karpah
    Chef, everything is lost, everything is lost !!! And my nephew has to relearn on the F-35. I will not let the blood to death. After all, the S-500 is power, and the F-35 is a flying iron, a child prodigy and cut dough ...

    Yes, what are you! Everything is exactly the opposite!
    The C-500 is a worthless craft made of cardboard and rusty iron, like everything in Russia, and the F-35 is a winged lamp of freedom from the most infallible country on earth, the last hope of the most offended people.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 17 2016 11: 50
      0
      Something F-35s do not fly in Syria, they are afraid of the S-400.
  12. shadow
    shadow April 16 2016 12: 26
    +2
    As it was written here, and I have repeatedly written about this that our people like to occupy the TTX, and the West, on the contrary: to overstate. I believe that the detection range of the S-500 is 1000, or even more than km, and regarding the missiles and their range, it is not a problem to raise it. I am sure that such missiles are being made, simply no one puts them on display and does not talk about them. They will tell about themselves when the time comes.
    1. Olga Metel
      Olga Metel April 16 2016 13: 17
      +1
      And ours do right. Then be a surprise-sz !!! laughing
      1. Karlovar
        Karlovar April 16 2016 14: 40
        -1
        There will be a service ....
    2. Karlovar
      Karlovar April 16 2016 14: 40
      0
      Detection range of 1500 km. like. And someone missed something about missiles - 700-750 km. in real life .... But the genre of conspiracy theology in military affairs has not yet been canceled ...
    3. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 16 2016 22: 01
      +1
      Quote: Shadows
      I believe that the detection range of the S-500 is 1000, or even more than km,

      Quote: Karlovar
      Detection range of 1500 km. like.

      The detection range of the CC is 200km longer than that of the S-400 and is 800km.
  13. bannik
    bannik April 16 2016 12: 59
    +3
    Puzzle for our overseas "friends":

    S-300 - 1975
    S-400 - 2007
    S-500 - 2016
    S-600 - ???
  14. 501Legion
    501Legion April 16 2016 13: 36
    +1
    It seems, why not really develop cruise missiles that can fit in size into air defense launch cells, just in case. like our missile defense is also not aimed at anyone
  15. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha April 16 2016 14: 07
    0
    And well done, they didn’t stand still, although it would be possible to stop, because the S-400 is an unrivaled air defense system for today. Interestingly, what is the cost of the S-500?
    1. hartlend
      hartlend April 16 2016 15: 57
      +2
      You can’t stop. We stopped in the 90s, we still can’t catch up.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 16 2016 22: 07
      +1
      Quote: Anchonsha
      I wonder what is the cost of the S-500?

      You have to pay for security! After all, we need Victory, but we will not stand for the price!
      In 2007, Rosoboronexport entered into an agreement with Iran for the supply of five divisions of the S-300 PMU-1 system worth about $ 800 million ($ 160 million per division). In 2014, four divisions of the S-400 Triumph system cost China already $ 1,9 billion ($ 475 million apiece). Venezuela in 2013 received two missile divisions of the S-300V for $ 1 billion (500 million per unit). For comparison: the cost of the American THAAD complex is about $ 2,3 billion. How much will the S-500 cost? One can only guess about this.
      http://vtbrussia.ru/tech/smozhet-li-s-500-sbivat-meteority
  16. ver_
    ver_ April 16 2016 14: 11
    0
    Quote: Alexander S.
    Zdorovo.A suitable rockets for the complex again in a few years will give out?



    Yes, fuck her. You’ll understand it. She’s older than Byzantium. It’s so "poached" to put a "shadow on the fence", which is not deciphered - in the Second World War, artillery and mortars fired with "cucumbers" .. And what do we have now - God knows for sure .., it might be that this C 500 is already in nature, and not one ..
  17. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 16 2016 14: 20
    0
    See, 0,5 pump, for good luck in the future! And if they call it "Lord" as planned I will repeat 0.5.
    1. hartlend
      hartlend April 16 2016 15: 53
      0
      So you can sleep. Smoother need, smoother.
  18. Holsten
    Holsten April 16 2016 15: 25
    +1
    Now this issue is in full order, which is an order of magnitude higher than "partner" opportunities. It remains to clean up Chubais, bulk, curls, silane and you can order coffee with a bun.
    1. hartlend
      hartlend April 16 2016 15: 55
      0
      It will be more difficult to clean up unnecessary columns. While in this direction, shifts are practically not visible. More like an imitation of violent activity.
  19. hartlend
    hartlend April 16 2016 15: 52
    0
    I am also glad that the S-500 will soon enter service. The "partners" will have a headache.
    This Gumenny said on the channel "Russia 24". According to him, "development work on the C-500 AAMS is now ending."

    Confuses only the phrase development work. Usually they are carried out at the design stage, and not launch into production. I hope Gumenny incorrectly expressed himself.
  20. alisarow
    alisarow April 16 2016 19: 05
    -4
    Maxim magazine issued instructions on how to become a male and satisfy any girl, I was shocked by the result and it really works! here is that article --- bit.do/macsho
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Sea Wolf
    Sea Wolf April 16 2016 22: 16
    0
    Russians slowly harness, but drive fast. The flywheel gained momentum. The Russian giant opened his eyes and looked around. This is for now. It will be more interesting further.
  23. Demeter
    Demeter April 16 2016 22: 53
    +1
    The good news would be to the troops ...
  24. lopvlad
    lopvlad April 17 2016 03: 10
    +1
    Quote: karpah
    At night, F-22s fly freely over the Alawite enclave of Syria and over Latakia, where the S-400 is located


    how many sleepless nights Natanyahu spent with the telephone so that Putin would allow the F-22 to fly, sometimes with the permission of Russia in the sky over Syria.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 April 17 2016 11: 47
      0
      I doubt your innocence. Radar no matter day or night.
  25. Insde
    Insde April 17 2016 05: 39
    0
    Quote: Wiruz
    It turns out in speed and Minutmen-3 and Trident-2 will be able to intercept ...

    You know, it’s a tradition in the West to overestimate the performance characteristics of your weapons. Our situation is strictly opposite bully

    That is, the range can be both 800 and 1000 km?)))
  26. satelit24
    satelit24 April 17 2016 11: 13
    -1
    Again for the pink-eyeglass joy laughing they didn’t have time to put as many as 400 into the army, it’s about the 500s, and next year they will talk about the 700s, which means there will be none other recourse
  27. cergey51046
    cergey51046 April 17 2016 11: 43
    0
    And then the US will say that the rapid rearmament of Russia took them by surprise.
  28. Urri
    Urri April 17 2016 21: 49
    0
    Quote: solo1601
    I think that the use of electronic warfare means such as "Krosukh", "Moskva" and the like will surpass even the C 400 in efficiency. Moreover, it is much cheaper to manufacture. How much does one rocket cost? and for one target, they are usually released two. The division's salvo, as I understand it, is only a maximum of 48 missiles, if there are 12 launchers. Electronic warfare means it is possible not only to repel a massive missile strike, but to redirect targets to where it is necessary, say, to the enemy, aerodynamic ones are definitely possible. So, is it better to build a C 400 division, or to make, say, "Krosukh" with this money?


    I congratulate you, Sharyk, you dunce!

    Yes, and the REP complex is called "Krasukha". The berry is so
  29. mmk
    mmk April 18 2016 10: 48
    0
    If only they justified themselves. The cost is poher, perspective and quality. It is clear that VKS must monitor the quality of their forces.