In the Astrakhan region of the "Iskander-M" launched a rocket with a "low radar visibility"

At the Kapustin Yar proving ground (Astrakhan region), a high-power cruise missile, launched using the “technology of reducing radar visibility”, is being launched, reports RIA News message of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

"Today (15 of April) at the Kapustin Yar proving ground in the Astrakhan region, the missile brigade of the Central Military District conducted a combat launch of a cruise missile from the Iskander-M OTRK missile complex at a command point of a conditional enemy at a distance of about 200 kilometers," release departments.

It is noted that “A rocket manufactured using the technology of lowering the radar visibility was not detected by means of electronic warfare of a conditional enemy and successfully hit the target.”

Comments

[aszzz888]

Well, so what about the meriditic missile defense? Money down the drain, gentlemen mattresses!

[grandson of the hero]

A good mallet for militant (fraternity) potatoes. And neighbors from 404 will also add salts.

[cniza]

Quote: aszzz888

Well, so what about the meriditic missile defense? Money down the drain, gentlemen mattresses!

Now there will be even more money to ask Congress, but in general it is necessary to do our job and not pay attention to their cries.

[Mengsk]

Quote: aszzz888

Well, so what about the meriditic missile defense? Money down the drain, gentlemen mattresses!

About "was not found" - so ours thought, that's all. This is not a real test of the effectiveness of "lowering radar signature", just testing a missile with some new "gadgets" on its own territory, on its own. Gd knows what the radar scanners will actually be in the missile defense chain in Europe. The very fact that such a chain is being built today is already a failure. Although it is not clear what prevents missiles from being launched across the United States in the other direction - through the North Pole, for example. You can't deploy any missile defense there.

[Muvka]

Quote: Mengsk

Quote: aszzz888

Well, so what about the meriditic missile defense? Money down the drain, gentlemen mattresses!

About "was not found" - so ours thought, that's all. This is not a real test of the effectiveness of "lowering radar signature", just testing a missile with some new "gadgets" on its own territory, on its own. Gd knows what the radar scanners will actually be in the missile defense chain in Europe. The very fact that such a chain is being built today is already a failure. Although it is not clear what prevents missiles from being launched across the United States in the other direction - through the North Pole, for example. You can't deploy any missile defense there.

Sarmat will fly like that. And with incomplete loading and through the south. And for the Status-6 missile defense does not pose any danger.

[max2215]

You’ll not deploy any missile defense systems there

Actually, everything intended by the SGA will fly there and across the Pacific Ocean, much shorter, but in Alaska, because it is also a powerful missile defense + missile defense ships.
It is necessary to shoot down at the initial stage of the trajectory, and for this you need to be as close as possible to the launch sites. It is the Iskanders with calibers that cause "righteous" anger in partners.
And on the approach, when the warheads go on target, and even maneuvering - roulette is not in favor of the defenders .....

[Michael67]

"... successfully hit the target."
They are not saying anything. Since no one saw her ...
Oh. Nothing exploded near the couriers there in the near future?

[opus]

Quote: Mengsk

which makes it difficult to launch missiles in the USA in the other direction - through the North Pole, for example. You’ll not deploy any missile defense there.

GBI interceptor missiles in Alaska: 13 - at Fort Greeley (Alaska)

naval base on the Adak Island of the Aleutian Ridge (Cobra Dane (Shemiah Island, Aleutian Islands) + Thule (Greenland, Denmark) + SBX sea-based radar (in the Pacific Ocean in Alaska)

[just exp]

theoretically in the northern Arctic will stand EM with SM-3 different blocks.

[DMB_95]

Quote: just EXPL

theoretically in the northern Arctic will stand EM with SM-3 different blocks.

Theoretically (and practically) EMs with SM-3 may already be burning (or drowning) by the time our ICBMs enter the zone of their destruction.

[just exp]

I’m also in words Rambo, but in fact, to sink the crew, and even more so AUG oooooooooooochen is not an easy task.

[DMB_95]

I agree, not easy. But the question is, in fact, about the Third World War, since ICBMs through the Arctic - in the States. The last (generally last) task. This is a completely different dimension or something .. What kind of rambo is there .. Many serve their whole lives to fulfill this task once.

[Barakuda]

How much does such paint cost in Voentorg, who knows? I'll paint the car ..

[Danash I]

Where out of turn!? You didn’t stand here at all !!!

[Lt. Air Force stock]

This is not Iskander-M, but Iskander-K.

[svp67]

At the Kapustin Yar training ground (Astrakhan region), a combat launch of a large-power cruise missile made “using technologies to reduce radar visibility” was performed

Erdogan and the EU quietly shuddered ... And Turchinov urgently ordered the construction of a new slingshot of the "great ukroPRO"

[aszzz888]

svp67 RU Today, 10:56 New
Erdogan and the EU quietly flinched ...

and they flowed on their knees!

[sufix]

high power cruise missile launch

Can anyone explain the difference between high power CDs and medium and low power CRs?

[Boa kaa]

Quote: sufix

What is the difference between high-power Raman and medium and low-power Raman?

It is appropriate to talk about CHARGES and their power.

Classification of charges by power
Modern:
 up to 1 kt — ultra-small;
 1 - 10 kt - small;
 10 - 100 kt - medium;
 100–1000 kt — large;
 over 1 Mt - super-large.
Classification given in the 1973 Military Encyclopedia:
 up to 15 kt - small caliber;
 15 - 100 kt - medium caliber;
 100-500 kt - large caliber;
 over 500 kt - super-large caliber.

"Power" (payload output) is usually referred to as ICBMs / launch vehicles. But even there, a classification is used according to the classes of carriers: light, medium, heavy, super-heavy launch vehicles. (family "Angara").
So, there is an incorrect expression of a journalist.

[opus]

Quote: sufix

What is the difference between high-power Raman and medium and low-power Raman?

nothing. There is neither one nor the other.
Long Range CR (CRBD)
and
small.
And "power" is to charge.

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

It is appropriate to talk about CHARGES and their power

On explosion power nuclear warheads of all types conditionally divided into 5 calibers:

[nazar_0753]

Maybe this is something like the ground version of the X-101/102?

[Blackmokona]

It is noted that "a missile manufactured using technologies to reduce radar visibility was not detected by electronic warfare of a conditional enemy and successfully hit the target."

Since when did electronic warfare equipment function as a radar?

[pv1005]

Quote: BlackMokona

It is noted that "a missile manufactured using technologies to reduce radar visibility was not detected by electronic warfare of a conditional enemy and successfully hit the target."

Since when did electronic warfare equipment function as a radar?

That's why they did not notice that it was not a radar.

[Letnab]

therefore, no one saw where the rocket ...)))

[Letnab]

therefore, no one saw where the rocket ...)))

[mamont5]

Quote: Mengsk

which makes it difficult to launch missiles in the USA in the other direction - through the North Pole, for example. You’ll not deploy any missile defense there.

Well, why? What are our people doing in the Arctic?

[Pvi1206]

missile launch with "reduced radar signature"

Not only.
The press reported that with an increased range (2000 km).
Here the joy will now seize the geyropu!

[hartlend]

missiles with "reduced radar visibility"

Tactically put it. In general, of course it pleases.

[Alisarow]

Maxim magazine issued instructions on how to become a male and satisfy any girl, I was shocked by the result and it really works! here is that article --- bit.do/macsho

[Old26]

Quote: Lt. Air Force stock

This is not Iskander-M, but Iskander-K.

The Iskander-K complex does not exist in nature. There is only Iskander-M, which carries both BR and KR. Iskander-K is the speculation of journalists

Quote: Pvi1206

The press reported that with an increased range (2000 km).

Well, the press can say anything. With a range of 2000 km, or 5000. They do not care what to write. At least the rocket (and this is most likely the 929th) is still being tested and it was not fired at its maximum range.

Quote: nazar_0753

Maybe this is something like the ground version of the X-101/102?

This is the R-500 version of the Iskander-M complex

[abrakadabre]

At the Kapustin Yar training ground (Astrakhan region), a large-power cruise missile was manufactured in combat, manufactured “using technologies to reduce radar visibility,” the Russian Defense Ministry reports to RIA Novosti.

Ummm ... Maybe the launch was a training, training or test one? From the phrase "combat launch" as it blows a flight or to the barmaley in Syria, or to sworn partners in the West.

[Hammer]

it is clear why they yell about a violation of the agreement on the liquidation of the INF