The British Navy raised the alarm. Close to Scotland came the Russian navy

123
Military flotilla Russia became the reason for raising the British Air Force on alarm. Russian ships approached the coast of Scotland at a distance of 30 miles. The flagship Admiral Kuznetsov approached the British coast, leading a flotilla of Russian ships from the North to the Mediterranean Sea. The ships are sent there for the exercises of the Black Sea Fleet. The Daily Mail (English edition) reports that for the first time in 20 years, Russian military vessels have come so close to the shores of the United Kingdom. The event, which occurred on December 12, on the site of the Royal Navy also found its reflection.

To intercept the Russian flotilla came York - the destroyer of the Royal Air Force. The ship traveled a thousand nautical miles from the base in Portsmouth (South coast of England) to the shores of Scotland. His main task was to control the movement of "Kuznetsov". In the Ministry of Defense of the United Kingdom explained that due to bad weather conditions to use the aircraft for this task turned out to be impossible.

It should be noted that the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrying cruiser did not enter British territorial waters, but was located in the economic zone, the rights to use of which belong to the United Kingdom.

Scottish nationalists, through Angus Robertson, the leader of this movement, expressed concern about the incident. Robertson said that adverse weather conditions give every reason for Russian sailors to rely on hospitality off the coast of Scotland, but “getting rid of garbage, throwing it just overboard, is more than bad manners.” The politician accused the sailors of the flotilla of dumping waste and garbage in the Scottish coastal waters. According to him, the flotilla ships did this in violation of international conventions, which Russia also adopted.

According to Robertson, the governments of Russia and Britain must explain what happened.

The approach of the Russian Air Force and Navy to the borders of Great Britain more than once raised airplanes and warships of the kingdom in alarm, the English edition continues. In the 2009 year alone, England’s air interceptors had to 20 times, as the publication expresses, to “drive away” Russian military aircraft from the kingdom’s airspace.

There are various versions of the purpose of sending to the Mediterranean Sea from Severomorsk a flotilla led by the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov. Nezavisimaya Gazeta reports that in addition to the officially announced joint exercises with the vessels of the Black Sea Fleet, Russian ships can participate in joint patrols of water and maneuvers with NATO forces. Also, the exit of the squadron from Severomorsk was accompanied by rumors that its movement to the Syrian shores was connected with the aggravation of the domestic political situation in Syria and the presence of the American aircraft carrier George Bush near its shores. In addition, observers believe that one of the goals of the maneuvers is to create some kind of "counterweight" to a squadron of American ships off the Syrian coast and to demonstrate power.

"Admiral Kuznetsov" is a group, which includes: "Admiral Chabanenko" - a large anti-submarine ship; "Nikolai Chiker" - rescue-tug vessel; tankers "Kama" "Vyazma" and "Sergey Osipov". Several ships of the Black Sea and Baltic fleets will join this flotilla along the line. Also, later it is necessary to expect the departure in the same direction of several Russian strategic bombers.

The press service of the Western Military District reports that the ships and ships of the aircraft carrier group, headed by Admiral Kuznetsov, will continue to cross the Atlantic after supplying food and water to the Mori Firth Bay from supply ships. This procedure, which began on December 12, was not fully implemented due to deteriorating weather conditions.

The report says that during the transition across the Atlantic, the crews of the heavy aircraft carrier “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov”, the patrol ship “Yaroslav the Wise”, the large anti-submarine ship “Admiral Chabanenko” and support ships would work out a number of maneuvers in the inter-fleet group, as well as will continue to improve maritime training. Deck pilots will start flying as soon as the appropriate weather is established.

Ships and support vessels of an aircraft carrier group in Mori Firth Bay anchored December 12.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    123 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +29
      17 December 2011 14: 34
      Let them get nervous, let them get used to being afraid.
      1. +6
        17 December 2011 14: 37
        put on a point!
        1. Pavel V
          +14
          17 December 2011 14: 54
          The ships just got closer, and how much kipish will be now. All and sundry begin to suck and suck on this topic. The first nationalists from Scotland to join, and then the Irish or something will go.
          1. +8
            17 December 2011 15: 45
            In addition to what the kids put in their pants, now they will do their best to sculpt a babayka from Russia so that everyone can see what "monster" brave England is opposing! Mom dear, how brave you have to be !?
          2. 0
            21 November 2013 22: 30
            Well, and then some all-crawlers shout about the insignificance of our fleet.
        2. +10
          17 December 2011 15: 23
          "Kuznetsov" off the coast of Great Britain has become a kind of symbol of the power of our fleet, the fact that despite all the shocks our Navy remains a formidable force.
        3. ytqnhfk
          0
          22 December 2011 11: 26
          Then the cut was from their forum as they discussed it, I laughed for a long time the poor poor suffered so much! There the panic almost started!
      2. NovoSibirets
        +9
        17 December 2011 14: 57
        For now, rather, let them dare not to dare!
      3. +8
        17 December 2011 15: 11
        Quote: Denis
        let them get used to fear.


        They are not used to it. Britain in the 1970s was virtually defenseless in the face of the threat of attack from the Soviet Union.

        "The air defense will not withstand the onslaught due to the insufficient number of aircraft and the lack of ammunition, which are designed for only two or three days. The army will be able to withstand a possible attack from the USSR only at the initial stage of the war. However, due to inadequate material and technical supplies, to repel the threat she can't "

        However, no one attacked them, but there was fear .....
        1. Anatoly
          +12
          17 December 2011 15: 29
          It’s in their fashion, like the Baltic states, Swedes and Finns - to hysteria and draw scary pictures about the attack of the Russian Federation. But why do we need them? ... they value themselves too high if they think that we care about them.
          1. +9
            17 December 2011 18: 10
            Quote: Anatoly
            But why do we need them? ...


            They write that Russian warships discharged liquid and solid wastes while anchoring.

            Or maybe it was not waste, but quite serviceable equipment, and only 30 miles?
            1. NovoSibirets
              +10
              17 December 2011 18: 16
              They smiled. Something like that?

              1. +4
                17 December 2011 18: 40
                Quote: NovoSibirets
                Something like that?



                Well, it seems like the Norway was lucky to catch our spy buoy, only he was already worthless
            2. Tyumen
              +4
              17 December 2011 18: 20
              Quote: Vadivak
              They write that Russian warships discharged liquid and solid wastes while anchoring.

              Here we wait for aglitsky stainless latrines, so we will * waste * only in our waters merge. And so - let them endure.
      4. +1
        18 December 2011 00: 50
        We are inappropriately afraid, but it’s definitely not worth it to relax.
    2. Anatoly
      +5
      17 December 2011 14: 43
      what a stress for the English! Now the press is a topic, provided for half a year wink
      1. snek
        +4
        17 December 2011 16: 59
        I went to the Daily mail website the main news - cooling and snowfall. Then something about the dismantling of Sarkozy, an article about new curricula in schools, the killing of a conductor on a train by a teenager, etc. Apparently, the note about our flotilla is already a thing of the past. Same thing on The Times website. So what about half a year - that you are a little mistaken.
        1. Anatoly
          +2
          17 December 2011 18: 10
          Afraid of panic lol
        2. Ion coaelung
          +2
          17 December 2011 21: 28
          To be afraid of shame !!! Firstly, their "ship" stubbornly hurrying to swim to the shores of Scotland - is this their mighty fleet ??? And due to bad weather conditions, they could not show their mighty aviation! lol patstalom as the Albanian says!
          1. 0
            21 November 2013 22: 33
            Simply fantastic - a frigate was launched to intercept the Cruiser!
        3. +2
          17 December 2011 22: 27
          Quote: snek
          Apparently, the note about our flotilla is already a thing of the past.


          Strange I was there too, but found this

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2073901/HMS-York-scrambled-Scotland-Russ

          ian-fleet-security-scare.html



          And here it is

          1. snek
            0
            18 December 2011 01: 41
            Well, I found this article through a search by keywords in Google. But on the main page of the site it was not. Funny, by the way, half of the comments on the article from ours.
          2. Lech e-mine
            0
            18 December 2011 19: 54
            auger stirs up water
    3. +8
      17 December 2011 14: 46
      Yeah, the dunghill started stirring ... It’s not for you to drive whiskey with liters ... The point is probably not iron, get used to it .... bully
      1. +6
        17 December 2011 15: 48
        They never understood otherwise - only strength! They always tried to play off others and eat chestnuts for free, and when "something" loomed near their native shores, the bladder immediately gave up slack. wink
    4. 0
      17 December 2011 14: 48
      stir like scallop lice
      1. Sergh
        0
        17 December 2011 16: 29
        So it’s not with the Africans on the deck to sunbathe, accustomed to butting with blacks. Let them really jump, otherwise they’re completely afraid!
    5. +8
      17 December 2011 14: 50
      Kuznetsrv BEAUTY, we would have a couple more of these fleets.
      1. +6
        17 December 2011 15: 50
        Denis, everything will be, if there are less ushlopkov from behind the hill, we will listen less!
      2. +1
        17 December 2011 16: 31
        And so they swam everywhere, swam
        1. +5
          17 December 2011 18: 49
          Quote: SlavaS
          And so they swam everywhere, swam


          Shit swims in the hole, and warships go !!!
          1. NovoSibirets
            +1
            17 December 2011 19: 00
            Is it just the military? ;)
          2. valeriigr,
            0
            17 December 2011 19: 47
            How do you know? What is an overburden sheet do you have an idea? Or so, a girl on a city pond? wink
            1. Tyumen
              0
              17 December 2011 23: 04
              The sheet of the ship's overhang, is it like a qualification for a sailor?
    6. +5
      17 December 2011 14: 53
      20 years of relaxation and here you are here hello
    7. NovoSibirets
      +16
      17 December 2011 14: 55
      Hmm ..))
      I wish this news sounded like this:
      "The British Navy raised the alarm. The Soviet military flotilla approached Scotland."
      1. Anatoly
        +8
        17 December 2011 15: 29
        Mdaaaa ......... Soviet - how nice it sounds! love
    8. +9
      17 December 2011 15: 02
      A Russian aircraft carrier, it’s not really an aircraft carrier, it doesn’t have that many planes, but it’s stuffed with missiles like “don't play with it”. This is how our aircraft carriers differ from all the others.
      Let the Saxons scum, they always did dirty tricks on us !!!
      The first henchmen of the USA, so that they all should be empty !! The entire fleet should be brought to their shores and several salvos should be given .....
      1. +7
        17 December 2011 15: 05
        This is where our aircraft carriers differ from everyone else.


        ash stump .. because he is an aircraft carrier cruiser
      2. +1
        17 December 2011 18: 42
        The aircraft-carrying cruiser.
    9. Galina
      +8
      17 December 2011 15: 06
      When the American aircraft carriers roam in those waters - this is normal, but when ours, for once, appeared, immediately a puppy screech! It's time, finally, to put these freaks in place! Glory to the Russian Navy!
    10. +8
      17 December 2011 15: 08
      Quote: NovoSibirets
      Hmm ..))
      I wish this news sounded like this:
      "The British Navy raised the alarm. The Soviet military flotilla approached Scotland."

      still will be, all ahead of the comrade. soon with such headlines and newspapers will be released
    11. +4
      17 December 2011 15: 12
      I can’t understand only one thing - why should the state so take care of itself by raising the Air Force on alarm? Is this the news that Russian ships are coming? Everyone knows about this all over the world. As always, some kind of circus tent.
      Well, you raised the squadron to extraordinary combat duty and calmly patrol evenly. But these cheap show-offs make me crazy ...
      1. NovoSibirets
        +4
        17 December 2011 15: 47
        Quote: Kaetani
        why should the state so take care of raising the air force on alert

        Apparently, acquired instinct!))
        People are in power there, who still remember what the USSR is!
      2. 0
        17 December 2011 16: 34
        So that the British, well, ordinary people who go to work every day in the morning, were in a "normal" mood
      3. +6
        17 December 2011 16: 34
        Quite a normal practice. Ours work out the passage off the coast of the so-called enemy, and the British work out the flyby and monitoring of our ship group. It has always been that way.
        1. 0
          17 December 2011 23: 51
          Correctly. Just yelling, why?
          1. Tyumen
            +1
            17 December 2011 23: 54
            What do you mean why? * England expects everyone to do their duty! * smile
            1. 0
              18 December 2011 08: 53
              Heather is needed for its constituents ....
      4. 0
        18 December 2011 08: 52
        Checked in ...
      5. +1
        18 December 2011 09: 40
        But these cheap show-offs make me crazy ...


        Yes, it's just propaganda for the local British people.
        1. +1
          19 December 2011 02: 09
          cattle do you want to say? wink
    12. +8
      17 December 2011 15: 20
      it became scary)) because it’s better not to joke with the Russians)) ours even doing nothing already makes the British worried.
      1. Anatoly
        +7
        17 December 2011 15: 31
        Well, how so! - we threw the garbage overboard there! This is already a provocation for them. lol
        Now they will run to the Strasbourg court to complain. lol
        1. 0
          18 December 2011 08: 54
          This is for their garbage plants. Let them use our garbage. Maybe you will like it!
    13. dred
      +1
      17 December 2011 15: 26
      The Anglo-Saxons again press a point.
    14. +4
      17 December 2011 15: 55
      Interestingly, what about the air?
      There are a lot of guys, really no one dared to inhale and "exhale"?
      Soon, and therefore, you need to wait for the note.
      PS And littering is not good, unless by surprise.
      wink
    15. Cardamom
      0
      17 December 2011 16: 09
      If anyone has forgotten, we are a very potential enemy for the British, so the "interception" of our ships for their air force is just a continuation of exactly the same "interception" of our strategic bombers - a simple routine. And these loud statements are just a part of the political life of Great Britain, you did not think that Medvedev was the first to come up with the idea of ​​earning political points on the image of an external enemy.
    16. OilGas2011
      +9
      17 December 2011 16: 09
      Russian ships approached the coast of Scotland at a distance of 30 miles, i.e. at a distance of 55 560 meters. Scottish nationalists are watching how Russian sailors get rid of garbage, throwing it just overboard. (I also want such a telescope)
    17. Aleks23
      +2
      17 December 2011 16: 11
      and what was York like?
    18. forkboy
      +3
      17 December 2011 16: 16
      it's time to send a couple of container ships with diapers to the brave Britons)
      1. Specialforce
        +1
        17 December 2011 23: 05
        cost, let shit in their tights))
    19. +3
      17 December 2011 16: 21
      Loot from the budget military commanders Britons knocked out. There wasn’t any threat, and they’ve been squeezed by their shit, so that only a small one remained from the Aglitsky fleet. And here once an informational gift, we have nothing to answer for these Russians, as if we weren't picking a pine tree from a pine forest.
      1. Tyumen
        0
        17 December 2011 18: 26
        Quote: kagorta
        military commanders

        COMMANDERS
    20. and1975
      +1
      17 December 2011 16: 25
      They are again driving a wave about fears, because if it were so, they would have sent their entire fleet from different bases, and they just pump it up as usual, making us the main enemies of the whole world, although everything is going within the bounds of the set. You will remember how they went out to sink the Bismarck with the whole fleet and threw it at its full height, which means that in case of danger the British will never go to withdraw one destroyer, besides, against a group of ships ...
    21. kostya
      +1
      17 December 2011 16: 29
      and why they were so scared because it was only nearby, I wonder what will happen to the Angles if our fleet regularly walks past them, get used to it or are constantly on the nerves
      1. +2
        17 December 2011 17: 49
        Quote: kostya
        and why they were so scared because it was only nearby, I wonder what will happen to the Angles if our fleet regularly walks past them, get used to it or are constantly on the nerves

        So before neurosis, not far from a nervous tic and enuresis wink
    22. 0
      17 December 2011 16: 35
      wink Not bad...
    23. Motherland
      +3
      17 December 2011 16: 44
      We know how to make subtle hints
    24. gans
      +1
      17 December 2011 16: 58
      By the way, somewhere it was announced that the Northern Fleet’s nuclear boats go along with the ships and they need to replenish the supplies of Scotch whiskey, so there’s the head of the barrels on the pier
    25. NovoSibirets
      +1
      17 December 2011 16: 58
      The truth was born to me and another version of this hip-hop!
      Those who need it will specially think over the event in order to increase the amount of budget financing of the armed forces, with all that it implies ...
      1. NovoSibirets
        +1
        17 December 2011 19: 05
        ___ inflate ___
    26. +1
      17 December 2011 17: 03
      You don’t understand a damn thing! They just wanted to convey a warm, fiery greeting from the Motherland to Berezovsky!
    27. -19
      17 December 2011 17: 03
      Maybe that's enough? Our leadership is doing wrong what reminds of the might of the USSR. It would be wiser for them to forget about the threat to the USSR, then it would be easier to restore the state. As the saying goes "the quieter you go on will be.
      1. Anatoly
        +4
        17 December 2011 19: 59
        You are wrong, young man. Not that world situation now. Much depends on such campaigns, exercises, etc. I remind you that this is the training of troops, the accumulation of experience, and maintaining the status of a sea power.
      2. Terminator
        +1
        17 December 2011 20: 45
        "the quieter you go, the further you'll get."
        from where you are going!
    28. +1
      17 December 2011 17: 13
      I’m not directly overjoyed, the Psheks are worried, soon the Romanians will start, and now the goat is aglitsky fellow
      1. -9
        17 December 2011 17: 26
        From a common fear, they will unite. So do not be happy
        1. NovoSibirets
          0
          17 December 2011 17: 29
          But did they NOT unite in 1950? !!!
          1. -6
            17 December 2011 17: 41
            Now the decomposition process is going on, and we are hindering this.
            1. NovoSibirets
              +2
              17 December 2011 17: 48
              All this corruption is public "masturbation, in front of the astonished public"! Undercover struggle to gain advantages within the bloc. NATO is the most alive! The only one who can "disintegrate" NATO is the United States, but they are not interested, for the time being ... So, do not wishful thinking.)) And we are not hindering this ...
          2. PN
            +1
            17 December 2011 20: 27
            Come together. But earlier, back in 1918. Wolves are shameful!
        2. 0
          17 December 2011 17: 58
          you probably do not know about the creation of the North Atlantic Alliance? belay
          1. -9
            17 December 2011 18: 25
            NATO will exist for as many years as you like! in the sense of whether it will be effective. at the moment it is not effective because there is no serious enemy.
            and we want to look spectacular. Now tell me why?
            1. 0
              22 December 2011 18: 12
              NATO will exist as long as God wills. But the economic situation in the EU this summer began to deteriorate sharply. What is it for? And after what?
        3. SAVA555.IVANOV
          +1
          18 December 2011 00: 24
          It’s a pity that we are not afraid of anyone, we would have to unite too (Ukraine means)
        4. +2
          22 December 2011 18: 07
          They united long ago when the Entente moved to Russia. They have never been and never will be our friends. Because we and they have a different attitude towards God. Russia is an Orthodox country, and they are Catholic and Protestant heretics who have long lived without God. That’s why they hate Russia. Otherwise, why the face of the Lord Jesus Christ was banned in the United States, and homosexuality is allowed in the United States army. So there is nothing to fear. God is with us!
        5. 0
          21 November 2013 22: 56
          It doesn’t matter - the USSR was alone against the whole world - and successfully stood - until this Gorbachev appeared
    29. sad frame
      0
      17 December 2011 17: 23
      Video
      http://bcove.me/v3hzr0hd
    30. sad frame
      0
      17 December 2011 17: 25
      Video presented on the Dailymail website
      http://bcove.me/v3hzr0hd
      1. snek
        0
        17 December 2011 17: 38
        By the way, why is there not a single aircraft on the flight deck? As far as I remember in the hangars, only a smaller part of the air group can fit there. Correct if I am wrong.
        1. Sergh
          +1
          17 December 2011 17: 44
          Then a fresh article appeared, look, whoever shows interest about Iran ..

          http://regnum.ru/news/fd-abroad/armenia/1479812.html
          1. +4
            17 December 2011 18: 03
            Thanks for the link. Satya makes you think seriously. It is on the basis of the one described in the article that Russia should periodically flex its muscles in order to somehow cool the ardor of the Anglo-Saxons in unleashing another slaughter. The British had already panicked. And all of Europe as a whole is beginning to understand that the Russian teddy bear is growing up. So far, only Pindos do not want to understand this, but I'm sure their turn will come.
      2. NovoSibirets
        +3
        17 December 2011 17: 53
        I hope this was our shot ?! Well, they wouldn’t let the adversary fly right over the group!
        1. PN
          0
          17 December 2011 20: 32
          Well, at the current level of photo shooting equipment, you can fly sooo far and get a high-quality picture. Although yes, it is interesting to know who fotkal ???
          1. NovoSibirets
            0
            17 December 2011 21: 19
            Yes, where does the picture? A pinwheel passes over the ships! The shooting point itself passes, not a vector.
    31. rysich
      +5
      17 December 2011 18: 14
      The main thing is that our ships would cause such a panic not only off the coast of Scotland and at least once a month.
    32. 0
      17 December 2011 18: 18
      Why are there no planes on the take-off deck? probably they simply no longer exist except for training and in general A.KUZ first of all the cruiser has weapons on board above the roof
      1. Valmar
        -1
        18 December 2011 03: 58
        oni vse v hangare
    33. 0
      17 December 2011 19: 03

      Is it necessary to understand that naval aviation on an aircraft carrier is not all-weather? I would like to delve into.
      1. Ion coaelung
        +1
        17 December 2011 21: 33
        Are you sure you want to install "Summer Weather" version 1.0?
        If yes, then click OK.
        The approximate installation time is uncertain :)))
    34. +2
      17 December 2011 19: 38
      York - the Royal Air Force destroyer - came to intercept the Russian flotilla. The ship traveled a thousand nautical miles from the base in Portsmouth. His main task was control over the movement of "Kuznetsov".... Controllers x @ eva. They would also write that they imperceptibly approached "Admiral Chabanenko"
      1. Superduck
        0
        22 December 2011 18: 31
        I think that there are other technical means to control such a "fool", especially in the North Atlantic there are plenty of them. York there meant sovereignty and of course he conducted electronic intelligence, which is quite natural.
    35. +1
      17 December 2011 21: 42
      Guys that you were so inadequately inspired? You might think that England has already been boarded.
      1. Tyumen
        +2
        17 December 2011 21: 59
        So now there is no reason to choose a reason. smile
      2. SAVA555.IVANOV
        0
        18 December 2011 00: 19
        Why not!!! It is extremely unfair that England owns the Thames; it must be distributed among all comers !!!!!! It's time to think about a house in England for every resident of the former USSR !!!! wink
        1. Superduck
          0
          22 December 2011 18: 30
          Well, for now, these dreams are embodied by Abramovich and Berezovsky.
      3. +1
        22 December 2011 18: 28
        I was in England about 10 years ago and then they were afraid of us and talked about Russia Putin's Russia. They also managed to release a bestseller in black and white. Well, of course in blacker ...
        And the people were pleased that the Europeans had become obese for a long time and they had little idea how much fuss was going on around them.
        Alexander Rahr (German political scientist) said that if these radars were launched in Kaliningrad about 15 years ago, then their European citizens would begin to hold such a meeting that the Americans would have to be tight. Or, in general, they would curtail missile defense in Europe.
        Simply, Russia was silent for a long time in response to various provocations.
        And the Anglo-Saxon military potential is completely insolent.
        And Russia will help him to shake himself and penetrate, they say that this is not a joke ... And we will rejoice at our Armed Forces and at the same time remember who our ancestors are and how it is worthless to let the enemy rest on our laurels and prepare our coups. Maybe the fifth column will also reflect on its perspective ...
    36. SAVA555.IVANOV
      +2
      17 December 2011 22: 16
      Ferocious ferrets !!!!!!!! But the Scots and Irish in general should perceive the Russians as future liberators !!!!!
    37. ESCANDER
      +2
      17 December 2011 22: 22
      Well, well, they will complain!
      Well ran, well, they didn’t give a shit. Eka is unseen.
      Not all Saxons shit where not getting.
    38. k2v2137975
      +4
      18 December 2011 00: 24
      The newspaper "The SUN" dated 17.12.2011. Translation from "neta".
      The fleet of the eyes of the Russian fleet in the UK

      I bother you ... HMS York continues to look at the Russian carrier ...
      VIRGINIA WHEELER
      Defense Editor
      Published: December 14, 2011
      ROYAL Navy destroyer continues to look at the Russian aircraft carrier, which triggered an alert off the UK coast ...
      HMS York was raised from Portsmouth to satisfy Admiral Kuznetsov and other warships ....

      The fleet appeared unexpectedly from the east of Scotland on Monday. It was the closest Russian warships to come in the waters of the UK for over 20 years .....
      Yesterday MoD said the fleet is faithful PRIME Minister Vladimir Putin, did not warn them he was passing so close to Britain ....
      It is anchored only outside the UK waters - 30 miles from Moray Firth ...
      The ships were thought to be dodging the bad weather in the North Sea. Russian news sites said 65000-ton Admiral Kuznetsov was on a training exercise in the Mediterranean. A British naval source said: "Whatever the explanation, it is a little unnerving to find Russia's huge navy task force so close to Britain."

      [email protected].

      And here are the comments of their bloggers:

      A UK naval source said: "Regardless, the explanation is that it is a little unnerving to find a huge Russian naval task so close to Britain."

      Yes, and we can not do anything about it, because our armed forces are nothing more than a symbolic detachment now.
      3 days ago
      Like
      salfordred2
      salfordred2 0 like

      And what should we direct towards him? This is the case of Russians testing our readiness. Wake up Cameron!
      3 days ago
      Like
      calvin_clark101
      calvin_clark101 0 like
      The Russians were the ones who actually defeated the Nazis, it is a complete myth that America won the war, all they did was infiltrate the invasion of England and "slightly" dismantle the German troops, the Germans actually retreated themselves from the Western Front they wanted to take on yourself Advice is a bad idea. This is why the Russians suffered the most from the loss of any other Allied country. Russia is one nation that you don't want to mess with.
      3 days ago
      Like
      westo14
      The Russians are here to save us .. rejoice!
      3 days ago
      Like
      bloody gooner

      Russia has no reason to attack the UK, they want nothing from us, and they will not have to send ships if they wanted to erase us from the world map.
      3 days ago
      Like
      Olnik
    39. 0
      18 December 2011 04: 43
      one bad vertical take-off no
    40. +2
      18 December 2011 05: 59
      Cool our nerves spoiled our English. Although they remember what the Russian fleet is, they completely forgot.
    41. +7
      18 December 2011 12: 48
      They are always St. Andrew’s flag like a bone in the throat, because they know that Russian sailors are not afraid of anyone and do not surrender to anyone. Let the viscars get soldered
      merchants.
    42. +2
      18 December 2011 19: 50
      the posture of our "Kuzi" is too low! don't you all think?
      1. SAVA555.IVANOV
        +1
        18 December 2011 21: 00
        "Gifts" are lucky for the enemies of Syria !!!!! wink
      2. Superduck
        0
        22 December 2011 18: 27
        Isn't sediment?
    43. kPoJluK2008
      +2
      18 December 2011 21: 25
      NATO nervously smokes!
      More often such sorties would be done!
    44. Conquistador
      +2
      18 December 2011 22: 31
      Oh crap! Nafig your Britain surrendered to us! We have what Russia is! So sit and don't rock the boat! fellow
    45. L. konstantin
      -1
      19 December 2011 04: 54
      ha ha! I had to go through this vessel (British) with a machine gun
    46. 0
      19 December 2011 10: 52
      The campaign of the combat group "Kuznetsov", a real demonstration of the flag of Russia, and albeit not the one that was in the Soviet Union, but still quite large power of the Russian Navy. The panic that gripped the Anglo-Saxons is a good argument in favor of building heavy aircraft carrier groups in the future. At a time when the planet has entered a time of massive regional conflicts, a powerful fleet is the basic argument in favor of our interests abroad. By the way, scheduled flights on the Kuznetsov began in the Atlantic on the way to Syria. Combat training is gaining momentum. GOOD how!
    47. -1
      22 December 2011 11: 08
      The Rusichs made the Anglo-Saxons nervous, as they probably turned them around! A desperate ship was sent to the flotilla!
    48. +1
      22 December 2011 14: 17
      Everywhere it speaks of FLOTILIA. And nowhere in the frames is it visible.
      Where are the guard ships?
      Why the English destroyer walks freely
      next to an aircraft carrier?
      Sad Nothing left of the fleet except this ship?
      Is that all we can?
      1. Superduck
        0
        22 December 2011 18: 09
        the large anti-submarine ship Admiral Chabanenko, the patrol guard Yaroslav the Wise, were with him. I’m not a sailor, because I’m not sure whether this is considered an escort or not, but American aircraft carriers are escorted several dozen times more in tons of displacement richer plus a couple of submarines. I don’t quite understand the situation, but the situation around Syria could explode at any moment, and such an Kuznetsov escort just won’t save if someone decides to accidentally let it sink. However, I admit that there are restrictions on the gilbert for such situations ..
    49. Superduck
      +1
      22 December 2011 17: 53
      I read that the cruiser with an escort himself asked for permission to take shelter under their coast from a storm. And if they took a trip then besides York there would have been about a dozen ships and about 5 submarines. And by the way, they could refuse ..
    50. Superduck
      +1
      22 December 2011 18: 56
      Yes, and I do not believe that he appeared so suddenly. Amers have tracked the Russian bases in the Northern Fleet at a very good level. Maximum frigate could slip through but not Kuzya.
    51. +1
      22 December 2011 23: 46
      While ours were getting rid of garbage, the submariners planted a couple of nuclear land mines under the shore, and what a good name for operation “garbage”.
    52. shmack
      0
      23 December 2011 11: 30
      British television loves the expression “not once since the Cold War” even more than ours - “has no analogues in the world.” This is the first time everything has happened to them since 1991, even if it happens regularly. Either they saw planes for the first time, or ships. A nation of paranoids is just...
    53. Artyom from Orel
      0
      23 December 2011 19: 12
      We have 4 Englishmen on our site wink
    54. 0
      24 December 2011 01: 41
      Little Brittany can now sing: “A nervous trembling seized me!” Five ships from RUSSIA passed by, and squeal!!! Again: why send a destroyer? Radars from the shore cannot see ships at a distance of 30 miles? Should it be like at the beginning of the 20th century: send patrol ships? And what could this destroyer be able to do if we showed some hostile intentions? Die “heroically”? One anti-ship missile with the Admiral Chebanenko BOD and there would be nothing left of the ship except the stem and sternpost. Well, or the Su-25 link would show off.... Bearing in mind the resistance of NATO ships to combat influences (either the Falklands, or an accidental attack by an Iraqi plane on an American corvette during the Iraq-Iran war), this destroyer is a victim... Let its crew quietly rejoice the peacefulness of the Russians, so that they remained alive....
    55. 0
      24 December 2011 06: 47
      And anyway, from what center point are they called great - ------ just Britain.
    56. zavesa01
      0
      24 December 2011 13: 49
      Quote: nnz226
      Again: why send a destroyer?

      An escort ship is sent for escort. This practice has long been accepted by all fleets of the world, this shows respect to the foreign fleet, as well as to resolve any administrative issues in the event of force majeure.
    57. Igserafim
      0
      13 January 2012 20: 38
      There is such a booklet “Russia enters the world ocean” (sorry, I forgot the author). her brief summary: the entire history of the Russian fleet in the XNUMXth century - the confrontation with the English fleet and the search for the most effective methods of cruising combat against the English merchant fleet. Which is understandable: they were then a world maritime power. And, apparently, in the subcortex of the Anglo-Saxons these phobias about our cruising fleet sit and are superimposed on their Atlantic anti-Russian consciousness, intensifying from each other many times over. But the elections were also undemocratic! HORROR!!!
    58. 0
      21 November 2013 22: 51
      Comrades, naval officers, can planes from Kuznetsov carry out their mission at night?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"