Media: India is conducting secret tests of a promising ballistic missile

31
Last month, India twice tested its latest K-4 ballistic missile launched from submarines, reports Look with reference to the Live Fist resource.

Archive photo

“The tests were conducted on 7 and 31 in March in the south of the Bay of Bengal. The firing range was 3,5 thousand. Km, “- said the source.

According to him, “these were the second and third tests of K-4”. The rocket was first tested in March 2014, “however, the details of this test remain unknown,” the source added.

At the same time, the portal notes that the government of India denies the existence of K-4.

Meanwhile, as previously reported, New Delhi is negotiating with Moscow to lease a second Russian nuclear submarine. Moreover, according to media reports, Premier Narendra Modi insists on the transfer of the most modern submarine to the Indian Navy.

The first NPS, the Nerpa, was leased to the Indian side at 2012 for a period of 10 years. In India, it is called "Chakra."
  • http://www.newindianexpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 15
    It’s interesting from which submarine the launch was made ...
    1. +3
      April 15 2016 14: 17
      It seems to me that this is not purely an Indian missile, probably it wasn’t without ours.
      1. +3
        April 15 2016 14: 20
        Prime Minister Narendra Modi insists on transferring the most modern submarine to the Indian Navy.

        Gee! And make working documentation for the assembly. To the kit. And what? Friends are ....
        1. +3
          April 15 2016 15: 17
          Quote: Stalker.1977
          It seems to me that this is not purely an Indian missile, probably it wasn’t without ours.



          They are not much and hide - joint development.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          April 16 2016 10: 07
          And they will get it, our leadership fulfills literally any desire of theirs, just looks into their mouths, amazingly but true ...
      2. 0
        April 15 2016 14: 33
        Quote: Stalker.1977
        It seems to me that this is not purely an Indian missile, probably it wasn’t without ours.

        Maybe it didn't work out, but it doesn't matter anymore. It is important that India is taking the leading role in the world in rocketry. Suffice it to recall the PSLV launch vehicle that delivered the Mangalyan probe to Mars. By the way, India is the only country that managed to do this on the first try. It says something.
        1. 0
          April 15 2016 17: 18
          It was just luck. And yes, they walk along the beaten track, so it’s not easy to stumble.
          1. -1
            April 15 2016 20: 53
            Dear Indians are beaten, but they have their own component base. And the fact that we will share our developments with them, and they with us - our own, there is nothing wrong.
    2. +1
      April 15 2016 14: 22
      Arikhant-class submarines
      1. 0
        April 15 2016 14: 26
        I think they will be a submarine 4 as opposed to Pakistan and China, and they will bring the rocket!
    3. +4
      April 15 2016 14: 27
      "I wonder which submarine was launched from ..."
      Most likely not from a submarine, but from a test bench.
  2. +1
    April 15 2016 14: 15
    If India is threatened by neighbors Pakistan and China, then what for them a nuclear war?
    1. 0
      April 15 2016 16: 57
      And we are also a fig.
  3. +6
    April 15 2016 14: 16
    laughing "India conducts secret tests of a promising ballistic missile"
    Well, if it’s already in the media, then yes - it’s definitely secret laughing
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 20
    Meanwhile, as previously reported, New Delhi is negotiating with Moscow to lease a second Russian nuclear submarine. Moreover, according to media reports, Premier Narendra Modi insists on the transfer of the most modern submarine to the Indian Navy.

    What is this paragraph for? Are they asking "Northwind" ??? We have no other modern SLBMs yet!
    Or again, "Russia is to blame"?
  7. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 24
    What are the secrets if I read about it?
  8. -2
    April 15 2016 14: 29
    Quote: Stalker.1977
    It seems to me that this is not purely an Indian missile, probably it wasn’t without ours.

    I’m not sure if we consider our failure with our solid fuel, I don’t think that the Indians wanted to turn to MIT for help when developing their own.
    Indian solid propellant ballistic missile K-4
    1. +1
      April 15 2016 14: 42
      Quote: Engineer
      Quote: Stalker.1977
      It seems to me that this is not purely an Indian missile, probably it wasn’t without ours.

      I’m not sure if we consider our failure with our solid fuel, I don’t think that the Indians wanted to turn to MIT for help when developing their own.
      Indian solid propellant ballistic missile K-4

      I do not understand, but what is the failure of Topol and Yars?
      1. +1
        April 15 2016 16: 33
        Quote: Muvka
        I do not understand, but what is the failure of Topol and Yars?

        Which boats are Poplars and Yars on?
        1. 0
          April 15 2016 16: 37
          Quote: lelikas
          Quote: Muvka
          I do not understand, but what is the failure of Topol and Yars?

          Which boats are Poplars and Yars on?

          No. The man clearly wrote that we do not know how to solid fuel. He did not specify a specific rocket.
          1. -1
            April 15 2016 21: 37
            Quote: Muvka
            No. The man clearly wrote that we do not know how to solid fuel. He did not specify a specific rocket.

            So the same people who made it cannot finish the poor Bulava.
            Today, we have a new rocket, 50% of which may simply not fly.
            It was here that the Indians understood that it’s better to try on their own — worse, it certainly won’t.
            1. 0
              April 16 2016 09: 40
              Quote: lelikas
              Quote: Muvka
              No. The man clearly wrote that we do not know how to solid fuel. He did not specify a specific rocket.

              So the same people who made it cannot finish the poor Bulava.
              Today, we have a new rocket, 50% of which may simply not fly.
              It was here that the Indians understood that it’s better to try on their own — worse, it certainly won’t.

              In what sense can not finish? Are you not confused by the fact that from 13 to 24 launches there was only one failure? Those. Of the 12 missiles, only one did not reach.
              1. -1
                April 16 2016 10: 47
                Quote: Muvka
                In what sense can not finish? Are you not confused by the fact that from 13 to 24 launches there was only one failure? Those. Of the 12 missiles, only one did not reach.

                It’s already too late for me to be embarrassed, those who cannot collect must be embarrassed
                identical missiles to understand what’s the catch. Probably about 12, 11 and 12 launches - should I also not remember? hi
                1. -1
                  April 16 2016 10: 58
                  Quote: lelikas
                  Quote: Muvka
                  In what sense can not finish? Are you not confused by the fact that from 13 to 24 launches there was only one failure? Those. Of the 12 missiles, only one did not reach.

                  It’s already too late for me to be embarrassed, those who cannot collect must be embarrassed
                  identical missiles to understand what’s the catch. Probably about 12, 11 and 12 launches - should I also not remember? hi

                  And what have 11 and 12 starts to do with it? You say you can’t finish the rocket. So from the 13th launch, only one was unsuccessful. By your logic, it turns out that the tridents are also raw threshing floor, because at first they had unsuccessful starts. Nonsense.
                  1. 0
                    April 16 2016 16: 41
                    Quote: Muvka
                    And what have 11 and 12 starts to do with it? You say you can’t finish the rocket. So from the 13th launch, only one was unsuccessful. By your logic, it turns out that the tridents are also raw threshing floor, because at first they had unsuccessful starts. Nonsense.

                    I beg you - you want the Tridents - but for God's sake - they have been tested for three years (and not 11 years as the Mace), all the problems have been eliminated, which arose again when starting from the boat - also - a good and reliable rocket is output.
                    Let’s count right from the 20th - all launches are successful - the effect is achieved.
                    Give the special forces, every 5th cartridge is defective - I'm afraid to imagine where they will put them in the giver.
  9. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 33
    This is already interesting; India is not North Korea for you.
  10. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 43
    Something with the name of some kind of misunderstanding. What are the secret tests, if all and sundry are writing about them? Maybe it’s better: "India is testing a secret missile"?
  11. 0
    April 15 2016 14: 45
    Give them one shark, restore at their expense, and give for 1 ruble. For us, the shark is yesterday, and we really do not need it, but the Indians will be happy.
  12. +1
    April 15 2016 15: 04
    Ours also train:
    The Ministry of Defense launched the Iskander-M high-power cruise missile

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/158893
    And the Indians - well done. Want peace, get ready for war.
  13. 0
    April 15 2016 16: 24
    Range to hit targets in Pakistan and China.
  14. 0
    April 15 2016 17: 09
    Hindus are the most peaceful people, why do they need rockets? They have war elephants and trained cobras laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"