Churkin: US "unilateral adventures" in Libya are dangerous

32
Russia's permanent representative to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, commenting on the US airstrikes in Libya, said that “one-sided adventures” can lead to dire consequences, reports RIA News.

Churkin: US "unilateral adventures" in Libya are dangerous


Churkin noted that the activities of the West in Libya "indicate a hidden agenda."

He recalled the reports of a number of publications that state that the American aviation in Libya, strikes at the positions of the IG, and the UK allegedly sent its special forces there.

“The situation in Libya continues to be extremely difficult. Despite all the efforts of the UN, the necessary national unity among the Libyans has not been achieved. A very alarming new phenomenon - ISIS managed to seize control over the strategically important areas of the country. All this requires concerted action by the international community, including through the UN Security Council, ”the diplomat told Izvestia.

“We warn our Western colleagues (a few days ago in the UN Security Council there was again a conversation on this topic) that one-sided adventures would not lead to good. Let's see if common sense prevails this time, ”
Churkin declared.
  • AP Photo / Bebeto Matthews
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    April 14 2016 10: 39
    All US history and foreign policy is a complete gamble. It will come out to them sideways, a matter of time.
    1. +3
      April 14 2016 10: 47
      Quote: RuslanNN
      All US history and foreign policy is a complete gamble. It will come out to them sideways, a matter of time.

      Leopard change his spots. However, as long as the United States is confident that someone else will save their face, such adventures cannot be avoided.
      1. +6
        April 14 2016 11: 07
        The United States needs Libya: its oil and MANDATORY its PORTS for access to the sea - and through THIS its colonial influence on the BW. Therefore, the Americans are unlikely to be stopped in their desire for a sole settlement of the alleged problem with IS in Libya. It is not for nothing that the United States "removed" Gaddafi, who once got out of their control.
      2. +1
        April 14 2016 11: 26
        I wonder who it saves the us face? They are so good on their own that almost no longer do makeup. And blondes already love the American dream.

        "The whole history and foreign policy of the United States is a continuous gamble. It will turn out sideways for them, a matter of time."

        But over time, there’s a snag. I would like to quickly.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. +13
      April 14 2016 10: 49

      “We warn our Western colleagues (a few days ago there was a conversation on this topic in the UN Security Council) that unilateral adventures will not bring to good. We’ll see if common sense prevails this time, ”Churkin said.

      Oh, I imagine Vitaly Churkin, how he wants to pick up a machine gun and shoot all this mattress shobla and their sixes, who is sitting in the UN, but Vitaly is obliged to observe diplomatic etiquette. Amerikosov has one common sense is profit, and for it they will go to any meanness.
    3. +1
      April 14 2016 18: 26
      when will this time come?
  2. +3
    April 14 2016 10: 40
    You have to think before you do .... but not thinking about doing it is an Achtung ...
    1. +1
      April 14 2016 11: 42
      Quote: Alex_Rarog
      You have to think before you do .... but not thinking about doing it is an Achtung ...

      Obama has already called his mistake that they removed Gaddafi and how the pig further climbed into the Libyan puddle, smeared in oil mud
  3. +4
    April 14 2016 10: 41
    “We warn our western colleagues

    It is useless to conduct any dialogue with them. These ghouls are on their own mind and bikes! Shit there, then again we rake! fellow
  4. +2
    April 14 2016 10: 41
    They want to repeat our success in Syria ???
    "Parodists", shitty!
    Screw up how to give a drink! Do not go to a fortuneteller! )))
    Oh, Anglo-Saxons, Anglo-Saxons ...
    Their history does not teach anything!
    As Vladimir Vladimirovich used to say:
    "If the grandmother had a" corresponding sexual organ ", she would be a grandfather!")))
    1. +2
      April 14 2016 16: 01
      Mikhalych17! 10.41. Why do they need our success in Syria? They have their own policies, which they successfully pursue. Why would they need a rich Libya or another country if you can take everything from the poor for cheap ?! What is the US benefit from the world in BV? Yes, no. Is it more profitable for them to buy oil at a dumping price or more than 100 bucks? If there is peace, then maybe oil will cost 200-300. Do they need it?
  5. +3
    April 14 2016 10: 42
    Leave already poor Libya alone, without your intervention, people themselves would have decided how to live, after you had trodden there, and before you they lived normally and the people did not complain, no, it is forbidden for them to live better than the West ...
  6. +4
    April 14 2016 10: 43
    West and common sense ... Concepts are not compatible ...
    1. +3
      April 14 2016 16: 08
      Fitter65! 10.43. Why not compatible? Very compatible. And their actions are very thought out. How to reduce the population and get benefits? Introducing sex education, contraceptives, same-sex marriage is a peaceful way to reduce. Inciting ethnic and religious conflict is a military way to reduce it. And where is the lack of logic? Everything is very clearly laid out!
  7. +1
    April 14 2016 10: 45
    Nothing Obama once again apologize, and everything will go as usual.
  8. +2
    April 14 2016 10: 56
    Quote: RuslanNN
    All US history and foreign policy is a complete gamble. It will come out to them sideways, a matter of time.

    After the war, the Germans also whined that Hitler was to blame for everything bully
  9. 0
    April 14 2016 10: 58
    Let the Americans be frolic.
    All the same, they can’t fix anything.
    1. +2
      April 14 2016 16: 12
      Pereira! 10.58. Why should they fix it? They (USA) somehow suffered from the war in the BV? Oil has fallen, refugee problems in the EU, Turkey squinting at Russia. What did the states lose? In my opinion they (the USA) are in positive territory on all fronts.
  10. +1
    April 14 2016 11: 11
    one-sided adventures
    dangerous, and multilateral - dangerous many times.
    That's why they are adventurous ...
  11. +4
    April 14 2016 11: 11
    FSA plans to reboot its own project ISIS 2.0.
  12. 0
    April 14 2016 11: 37
    They will get Afghanistan there, only in a much worse version. Wash yourself in Somalia.
    1. +2
      April 14 2016 16: 18
      Trobly! 11.37. In Afghanistan, they did well. They came to organize the production of opium. The country is in ruins. In Somalia, what did they create? We all know about scorched earth tactics. The United States applied this tactic to BV in a modern version. Sarcasm about US failures is inappropriate here. Their policy is very successful. And this must be admitted.
  13. +1
    April 14 2016 11: 44
    Let's see if common sense prevails among them this time.

    It is unlikely. Exceptional with this is not very
  14. 0
    April 14 2016 12: 04
    Sorry, "The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness"!
  15. +3
    April 14 2016 13: 11
    “Despite all the efforts of the UN, the necessary national unity among the Libyans has not been achieved. A very disturbing new phenomenon - ISIS managed to seize control of strategically important areas of the country. All this requires concerted action by the international community, including through the UN Security Council. ”

    Until their fosterlings in the State arrange a bloody massacre, nothing will reach the grandchildren of Uncle Sam, and if they do, then very briefly. Their memory is short.
  16. 0
    April 14 2016 13: 30
    “We warn our Western colleagues (a few days ago in the UN Security Council there was again a conversation on this topic) that one-sided adventures would not lead to good. Let's see if common sense prevails this time, ”

    Well done good Vitaliy !!! A real man!!! Directly, openly and boldly warned the partners that they could be pretty deplorable lol end!!! good In general, he is a MAN with all capital letters in the word MAN !!!
    Taking off my hat hi before a real MAN !!!
  17. 0
    April 14 2016 14: 39
    Churkin gently warned. But who will listen to him? Abamers? Let them get deeper, do not interfere with zealous clever people. Let them print green paper, spray their sun and, due to their objective moronity, make mistakes. As the events in Geyropa show, they will soon get to the fat ones. Let them break the right item if they like it.
  18. +1
    April 14 2016 14: 40
    In general, the whole American country is a big adventure !!!
  19. 0
    April 14 2016 15: 55
    Reporting a military aircraft shot down in the Raqqi area. Who heard what?
  20. +1
    April 14 2016 16: 31
    ".. one-sided adventures will not lead to good. Let's see if their common sense prevails this time .." I doubt that they have common sense. For them, there is only the meaning of profit.
  21. +1
    April 14 2016 18: 27
    Yes, they even piss balls ...
  22. +1
    April 14 2016 18: 41
    Russian is good, bathed in its glory in Syria. Well, they decided to start quietly in Libya, maybe it will turn out to be famous in the fight against ISIS. Or maybe they decided to crank up some kind of gamble with the goal of making money, if the Britons began to pull together quietly there. From these countries everything can be expected, but not good ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"