The exercise in the TSO demonstrated the effectiveness of Russian air defense missiles.

19
In the framework of the Russian-Belarusian air-fire conference, the military personnel of the civil defense subunits at the Telemba test site demonstrated the capabilities of the C-300, Pantsir-S, and Tor-M2 systems; MIC with reference to the press service of the Eastern District.

The exercise in the TSO demonstrated the effectiveness of Russian air defense missiles.


“Bilateral tactical exercises took place at the specialized training and tactical complex“ Teleba ”in Buryatia. SAM calculations performed the detection, capture and tracking of various types aviation conditional adversary, ”said the head of the press service of Alexander Gordeev.

"In addition, on the standard radar systems, an algorithm was developed to bring the coordinates and the source data of air targets from command posts to launchers," he said.

“The role of the conditional enemy was performed by the crews and pilots of fighters, attack aircraft and attack helicopters from the Trans-Baikal Territory. Aviation has worked out the issues of covertly overcoming the enemy's air defense zone, using tactics at ultra-low altitudes and planning, ”said Gordeyev.

According to him, the event involved “two Su-30CM fighters, two Su-25 attack aircraft, four Mi-24 attack helicopters and more than 200 units of other military and special equipment, including air defense systems”.

The joint air-fire conference will end on April 14.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 13 2016 15: 30
    It is clear that no one will tell us, but such a child’s question: who will fulfill his task, the Su-30 with all the possible electronic warfare kit or S-300 to destroy it? what
    1. +7
      April 13 2016 15: 31
      quiet employee gru rsh rf laughing soldier
      1. +5
        April 13 2016 15: 35
        Quote: Vladimirets
        It is clear that no one will tell us, but such a child’s question: who will fulfill his task, the Su-30 with all the possible electronic warfare kit or S-300 to destroy it? what



        And they’ll do it right, but in general an interesting competition ... to see.
        1. +3
          April 13 2016 15: 47
          Military men of the BBO compounds at the Teleba training ground demonstrated at the Russian-Belarusian air-fire conference
          and here's another interesting
          “The bilateral tactical exercise took place at the Telemba specialized training and tactical complex in Buryatia.

          Our answer will be tough! hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    April 13 2016 15: 31
    More good and different teachings!
    1. +7
      April 13 2016 15: 45
      I do not want to seem too smart, but ... More comments are smart and informative.
    2. +3
      April 13 2016 17: 03
      More good and different teachings! good laughing
  3. +1
    April 13 2016 15: 32
    A little off topic - yesterday there was a program about the Chelyabinsk meteorite - I wonder - our air defense and missile defense - it was detected or not?
    1. +2
      April 13 2016 15: 36
      I won’t say for air defense, but I already saw this meteorite in Yekaterinburg (on the way to work).
      A meteorite is not a needle; it is already perfectly visible.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      April 13 2016 15: 48
      Quote: lelikas
      Interesting - our air defense and missile defense - it detected or not?

      I doubt it! if they did, then there was too little time to observe on the radar.
      But I know who spotted! Population on DVRs!
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      April 13 2016 16: 10
      I think I didn’t detect it. The observation is carried out firstly at the launch of the ICBM and after that along the entire supposed trajectory and ballistic orbits, and the meteorite came in a straight line from space. NASA is also engaged in this with amateurs, we probably also have the corresponding services. Although it is almost impossible to detect a small-sized cosmic body moving, for example, in oncoming courses. It is possible to detect cosmic bodies flying in intersecting courses, since they can be noticed for some time, before the collision.
      As an example, a bullet or projectile fired in relation to an airplane (target) from different sides. On the forehead, or in the pursuit of the side.
  4. +3
    April 13 2016 15: 34
    Many abroad gritting their teeth recognized that our air defense is the best in the world
  5. +2
    April 13 2016 15: 38
    And what, our air defense systems still have to prove to someone their effectiveness?
  6. 0
    April 13 2016 16: 00
    "overcoming the enemy's air defense (air defense) zone, using tactics of flight at ultra-low altitudes and planning," - said Gordeev

    I heard about the tactics of breaking through the enemy’s air defense at very low altitudes. Apparently there is a full vinaigrette and you need to separate the flies from cutlets.
    The tactics of planning, this probably still applies to the tactics of breaking through air defense. Detection / destruction of the enemy radar by one aircraft, and then a breakthrough at ultra-low altitudes by attack and bomber aircraft.
    So what? Correct who in a subject ...
  7. +1
    April 13 2016 16: 06
    Not far from me. The exercises (firing) on ​​Telembus are now held very often. You can also often see the technique going to (c) the landfill. They come not only from the village of the east but also from Belarus .......
  8. -1
    April 13 2016 16: 07
    Quote: Vladimirets
    It is clear that no one will tell us, but such a child’s question: who will fulfill their task, the Su-30 with all the possible electronic warfare kit or S-300 to destroy it? what

    The winner is the one whose crew will be more sober. wink
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      April 13 2016 16: 12
      In your opinion, pilots fly a fake to varying degrees of its adoption? winked
      1. -1
        April 13 2016 20: 19
        There is a joke in every joke!)) I personally heard the story of a familiar flyer about how, the next day after celebrating his colleague’s birthday, he tried to land. They knew, he said that there would be flights, but only the whole sky was overcast with clouds and the rain was not stopping. We decided that everything will be canceled. And in the morning - the sky is blue, not a cloud! And when landing, instead of one lane - two! On the third lap, when the fuel ran out, he took a chance and landed the plane in the middle. Guessed it! laughing
  9. +2
    April 13 2016 16: 12
    Quote: ALEXX.
    Many abroad gritting their teeth recognized that our air defense is the best in the world



    That's right, their military doctrine is completely different - offensive, and ours is defensive, so we are constantly improving our air defense, and they are doing this partly.
  10. 0
    April 13 2016 16: 58
    Here is not at all !!! not interested in how military equipment shows itself in exercises. No. Do you know why? The exercises are practical training of personnel in the possession of military equipment, i.e. not in classrooms, but in the field, with full deployment. There (if someone did not participate) the skills of full interaction of all personnel are polished: crews, crews, units and units ... Yes Believe me, demonstration videos of any types of Russian weapons are one question, and the use of this weapon in real combat is completely different ...
    I would very much like to see (hear, read in the news, look in the programs) how, for example, those delivered in accordance with the S-300 agreement showed themselves in Iran winked similar to the use of "Caliber" in Syria wink
    And so ... you can only pat ... fellow

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"