Military Review

US media talked about Washington's "plan B" for Syria

40
American edition The Wall Street Journal writes that the media staff managed to find out about the mysterious “Plan B” that the United States is ready to implement if the process of peaceful settlement of the conflict in Syria fails. Referring to a group of US officials, the media reports that the Pentagon, in the event of a breakdown of the cease-fire regime, will begin to supply more “moderate Syrian opposition" weapons.


US media talked about Washington's "plan B" for Syria


We are talking about weapons systems that “moderate oppositionists” will be able to use for attacking artillery batteries of the SAR army, as well as on planes of the Air Force of the Syrian Arab Republic.

This statement actually proves the fact that the existing weapons of those who identify themselves as the so-called “moderate opposition to Syria” appeared during direct contacts with the United States. And if you take into account the presence of photographs where American senators meet ISIS’s future thugs and nicely smile at the frame, there is a clear logical chain that suggests that Washington is often inclined to “confuse” the “moderate opposition” and militants of organizations internationally recognized terrorist. Do not "confuse" again? ..

The Russian Foreign Ministry commented on another statement about the Washington "Plan B". RIA News cites a statement by the deputy head of the Russian foreign affairs agency, Sergei Ryabkov:
This is an attempt to put pressure on Moscow, and this interferes with normal operation.


It must be recalled that 49 of various factions joined the ceasefire in Syria. But ISIS, “Dzhebhat an-Nusra”, “Ahrar ash-Sham” and other most odious terrorist structures continue to conduct active hostilities. That is why the US claims that they are going to arm someone again in the SAR look like a new attempt to reduce the cease-fire agreement to zero.
Photos used:
@esHunterNews
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black April 13 2016 12: 50
    +14
    The United States wants to unleash chaos and World War III, but it still doesn’t succeed, so they are taking desperate measures by making such aggressive statements .... but it will end up with a curious weapon that will blow up the market or metro in the next geyropa town
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 13 2016 12: 59
      +14
      Striped Ameripedes need to quit smoking "plan", then enlightenment may come in the inflamed brains, because on the cunning ass, there will always be a threaded bolt and all their plans a, b, c, d and so on may have more thoughtful plans1,2,3,4 , XNUMX and so on.
      1. The black
        The black April 13 2016 13: 32
        +7
        It’s interesting, but will the UN mumble something about the violation of the United States of international law? what
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana April 13 2016 13: 49
          +5
          Opposition by the government troops of the SAR is divided, according to the idea, into three groups. It:
          1) those 49 different groups that joined the ceasefire in Syria. Which were previously against the Assad regime on their own convictions and after the liberation of the territory of the SAR from the Islamic State, switched to Assad’s side, perceiving it as a liberator, and at least became non-neutral;
          2) ISIS, Jebhat al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham and other most odious terrorist structures that continue to conduct active hostilities;
          3) those whom the United States ranks as the so-called "moderate opposition to Syria."
          So, the difference between the 2 and 3 listed groups is only that some are overseen by the CIA, and others by the Pentagon. As they say, radish horseradish is not sweeter.
          That is the whole secret of the “plan B” in the USA. Namely, if the first forces on the list are pushed back to a peaceful settlement, the United States will bring “controlled chaos” to the UAR by the 1nd and 2rd forces on the list — naturally, with the full interaction of the bureaucrats of the CIA and the Pentagon with each other. And the United States will shift the blame for the intensification of this declared, allegedly forced military intervention in Syria, to Assad and Russia.
          That's the whole "Plan B" of the Americans!
        2. FIREMAN
          FIREMAN April 13 2016 14: 04
          +4
          Black RU Today
          It’s interesting, but will the UN mumble something about the violation of the United States of international law? what


          Want about the UN. You are welcome:
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The black
          The black April 13 2016 13: 37
          0
          Thus, quite distinct signals come from the USA that the cease-fire by the efforts of the American special services will be frustrated
      3. Inok10
        Inok10 April 13 2016 13: 46
        +4
        Quote: vovanpain
        Striped Ameripedes need to quit smoking "plan", then enlightenment may come in the inflamed brains, because on the cunning ass, there will always be a threaded bolt and all their plans a, b, c, d and so on may have more thoughtful plans1,2,3,4 , XNUMX and so on.

        ... the louder the mattress screams, the worse their deeds ... hi ...
        We are talking about weapons systems that “moderate oppositionists” will be able to use for attacking artillery batteries of the SAR army, as well as on planes of the Air Force of the Syrian Arab Republic.
        ... I wonder what is meant by such systems ... they will supply ACS and SLAMRAAM ... or they collect all our old Buk from Eastern Europe ... something tells me that in any case this action will hiccup to mattress makers ... hi
    2. Dad lawyer
      Dad lawyer April 13 2016 12: 59
      +3
      Russia always has a plan "M" for such cases, which in translation means "wet all m ..." They will finish badly there in the west!
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 April 13 2016 13: 24
        +1
        It seems to me that the United States is unlikely to supply MANPADS there, because in this case, these weapons can pose a threat to Israel.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. max702
      max702 April 13 2016 13: 51
      +2
      Throw you all these flirting! In Syria WE are at war with the USA and world capital .. Yes, yes We are fighting! And it is necessary to look at all this from this point of view .. And in war as in war .. All means are good .. While there is a tense draw, no one picks up .. Let's suppose the slippers will crush and Assad will have a hard time in this case, our contingent and again there will be at least a draw .. And if Assad begins to successfully wage the war to a victorious end, then the bourgeois will increase funding and in the event of large-scale defeats will switch to guerrilla-terrorist tactics .. All this mess is there for a very long time .. Alas .. For looking on the scale of the conflict, where in "epic" battles, according to the reports of both sides, several dozen people die, such databases can last for decades, because the resources for such costs are practically inexhaustible.
      1. alicante11
        alicante11 April 13 2016 13: 56
        +4
        Throw you all these flirting! In Syria, we are fighting with the United States and world capital.


        The oligarchic RF against world capital? Bees versus honey? I am begging you. It's all because of the dibs, our oligarchs decided to clean up, so they got sweet.
    5. Blondy
      Blondy April 13 2016 14: 15
      +2
      In general, such deliveries are called arms smuggling for illegal bvndformations, even if you call them moderate opposition - the essence of this will not change. In Soviet times, this was called a subversive operation against the legitimate authorities of a sovereign state.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 13 2016 12: 51
    +5
    If there is this plan "B", then it is not surprising. The Merikatos rattled always and everywhere. This is their lifestyle. Tricky, in a word. laughing
    1. sever.56
      sever.56 April 13 2016 12: 59
      +14
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/912/nfwt339.png
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 April 13 2016 13: 29
        0
        By the way: what happened to Satanovsky at Solovyov's "Sunday Evening"? He is OK?
  3. udincev
    udincev April 13 2016 12: 52
    +2
    US statements that they are going to arm someone in the SAR again look like a new attempt to reduce the ceasefire to zero
    It seems that Plan B is the main US plan. Plan "A" (ceasefire agreements) under pressure from Russia and public opinion, a plan for a forced cover.
    1. The black
      The black April 13 2016 12: 53
      +3
      They had already prepared and armed the opposition for quite some time. Where are these people? Where are the weapons. Therefore, where is the guarantee that these MANPADS will not appear at ISIS?
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik April 13 2016 13: 46
        +1
        Quote: Black
        They had already prepared and armed the opposition for quite some time. Where are these people? Where are the weapons

        Everything is there in ISIS. And the new weapons will be there. The states, as there was one plan, so one remained: to rock the world before the war. And all the letters: A, B, C, D, etc. from the evil one.
      2. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher April 13 2016 15: 30
        0
        Quote: Black
        They had already prepared and armed the opposition for quite some time. Where are these people? Where are the weapons. Therefore, where is the guarantee that these MANPADS will not appear at ISIS?

        So this is ISIS. They were prepared.
    2. alicante11
      alicante11 April 13 2016 13: 59
      0
      The impression is that Plan B is the main US plan. Plan "A" (ceasefire agreements) under pressure from Russia and public opinion, a plan for a forced cover.


      Yes, I do not think that Americans can deliver something serious. Heavy long-range air defense systems will be destroyed very quickly by our own aircraft. Yes, and not so many of them at NATO to scatter. But the short-range air defense systems and MANPADS of the terrojugs are already taken by the Syrians, and Soviet-made MANPADS from the same Libya also shone in the 12 year.
      So bullshit is a sketch.
  4. kolexxx
    kolexxx April 13 2016 12: 53
    +5
    Americans, therefore, show the whole world that the bandits who cut their heads use chemical weapons against the civilian population, their friends. All the troubles in the world are from the obese and dumb elite of the United States, which, for its own enrichment, violates all conceivable and unthinkable facets of common sense.
  5. Gray brother
    Gray brother April 13 2016 12: 55
    0
    "which the United States is ready to implement if the process of a peaceful settlement of the conflict in Syria begins. Citing a group of American officials, the media reports that the Pentagon, if a ceasefire is established, will begin supplying the" moderate Syrian opposition "with more powerful weapons."
    Translated here ... on ours. repeat
  6. RussianRoulette
    RussianRoulette April 13 2016 12: 56
    +2
    In addition to the letter "B" in the alphabet there are still enough letters for reciprocal plans.
  7. Abbra
    Abbra April 13 2016 12: 56
    0
    It's just that Americans have fewer letters in the alphabet than we do. We have a plan "I". It is called - I AM RUSSIA!
    1. BIGLESHIY
      BIGLESHIY April 13 2016 15: 34
      +1
      Quote: Abbra
      It's just that Americans have fewer letters in the alphabet than we do. We have a plan "I". It is called - I AM RUSSIA!

      And we also have the letter Y. On their plan B, we can stir up Operation Y.
  8. vanavatny
    vanavatny April 13 2016 12: 59
    +3
    of the more powerful only anti-aircraft weapons, the rest against sars and our VKS is zilch and burning money, but the provision of anti-aircraft weapons is almost a declaration of war, I do not believe it (or I don’t want to believe it)
  9. Wedmak
    Wedmak April 13 2016 13: 09
    +9
    Just awesome logic. There is a peace process, the weapon, as it were, ceases to shoot, is taken to warehouses. And then this process breaks down! It would seem that it is necessary to more strictly monitor the seizure of weapons, to determine who is the gangster and who is not - to press the first, to help the second, and to press on the paws for the breakdown. But do not supply new weapons with any sauce.
    And then American logic appears. If the peace process is thwarted, it is necessary ... to deliver even more and more powerful weapons to outright bandits. Super!
    Ours at least support official power, it at least somehow fits in with international laws. US laws are not written.
  10. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 April 13 2016 13: 10
    +2
    In fact, this "plan B" is the unleashing of the third world in a hot phase ...
  11. Masya masya
    Masya masya April 13 2016 13: 14
    +5
    "If the ceasefire breaks down, the Pentagon will begin delivering more powerful weapons to the" moderate Syrian opposition. "
    The states have a ceasefire like a bone in their throat ...
  12. Roman 11
    Roman 11 April 13 2016 13: 15
    +4
    about that mysterious "plan B" Clowns, what is the mysterious plan? In all kindergartens, children giggle over the conquering secrets of American fascists ...... Why fascists? Because only they are capable of spilling the bloody seas - people for them are insects, i.e. Fuhrer theory.
  13. salad
    salad April 13 2016 13: 15
    +6
    How tired of these @ uki! the mattress already almost officially confirms that they do not need peace! burn in hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!! all the troubles of the world on the shoulders of these cattle !!! am
  14. engineer74
    engineer74 April 13 2016 13: 29
    +3
    To all appearances, the "probable partners" will carry out their plan "B" in any case, it is not a great problem to disrupt the negotiations! sad
    But, I believe, in the Kremlin and on the Arbat, for every cunning plan "B" there is already a plan "C" with a screw! wink
    In general, how to look at the situation, if the SSA are "white and fluffy" rebels, then the armed forces of the DPR / LPR are exactly the same and also need serious weapons, instructors and intelligence ...
    IMHO
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 13 2016 13: 59
      +2
      Quote: engineer74
      if the SSA are "white and fluffy" rebels, then the armed forces of the DPR / LPR are exactly the same and also need serious weapons, instructors and intelligence...

      And most importantly - a good attack on the original Russian Lviv! wink
  15. valent45
    valent45 April 13 2016 13: 34
    +1
    For us, the main plan A and us FSUs. any other plans, especially Amer.
  16. Yugra
    Yugra April 13 2016 13: 42
    +1
    Apparently, after the supply of such weapons, a couple of civilian aircraft will have to fall in Turkey, so that the mattresses turn on the brain ...
    1. pigkiller
      pigkiller April 13 2016 14: 57
      0
      In this case (God forbid), Assad and Russia will be to blame for the mattresses.
  17. xBoris
    xBoris April 13 2016 13: 50
    +3
    From the point of view of the States - everything is generally "good" !!
    Asians beat each other, only have time to pull the iron ...
    In Europe - the same, then an explosion, then rape ... then what kind of venture "come in large numbers" will invent.
    All are busy, on the most "I can not".
    Russia alone crawls into all holes and extinguishes "fires". Well what to do with her .. ?? !!
    They pushed the ruble into the very crack, and dropped the oil .. But no way ..
    So, this is the most "truce" for them - just a pitchfork to the side.
    It must be ripped off.
    What they are working hard on.
  18. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek April 13 2016 13: 56
    0
    Interestingly, the United States will teach and supply MANPADS with bearded men. And then the trained comrades will go to Afghanistan, Pakistan, C Arabia, Bahrain, Turkey. If, say, planes begin to fall in Turkey or Jordan, what will be the reaction? In the time of Afghanistan there was a clear separation between friends and foes, and now everything is so confused. In general, the distribution of MANPADS will not be able to continue to be controlled, the states are falling apart, the arsenal diverge and shoot not where intended. Armies that have anti-attack missile systems on the aircraft will be able to conduct combat operations, and those that do not have them will face heavy losses ...
  19. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx April 13 2016 14: 52
    +1
    Quote: Zaurbek
    Interestingly, the United States will teach and supply MANPADS with bearded men. And then the trained comrades will go to Afghanistan, Pakistan, C Arabia, Bahrain, Turkey. If, for example, in Turkey or Jordan planes begin to fall, what will be the reaction

    Until planes begin to fall in America, NO!
  20. _my opinion
    _my opinion April 13 2016 16: 58
    0
    US media talked about Washington's "plan B" for Syria

    plan of the Americans: to fill the fire of the war with gasoline, then pretend that they have nothing to do and scream that it is Russia to blame ...
  21. Papapg
    Papapg April 13 2016 17: 34
    0
    We are talking about weapons systems that “moderate opposition” will be able to use to attack artillery batteries of the ATS army, as well as airplanes of the Syrian Arab Republic

    How will they feel when passenger planes are hit by this or other weapon? From the oak tree, these authors of plan "B" fell, to come up with such. In general, what's going on in their heads?
    Some kind of vinaigrette.