Military Review

"Admiral Tributs" will return to service in July

33
BOD "Admiral Tributs" will return to the military composition of the Navy after the repair and restoration of technical readiness in July, reports RIA News message of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.




"The large anti-submarine ship of project 1155 Admiral Tributs" in July of the current year will return to the combat personnel of the Naval fleet after repair and restoration of technical readiness at the Dalzavod enterprise, and will continue to carry out tasks as part of the Pacific Fleet. Currently, the ship is being tested, "
says release.

It is reported that in the “framework of the State Defense Order before 2021, it is planned to send for repair and modernization six BODs of the 1155 project of the Northern and Pacific Fleets”.

In the course of the repair, “a large amount of work will be carried out on updating the life support systems and radio engineering armaments,” the press service noted.

“The large anti-submarine ships of the 1155 project today form the basis of the anti-submarine forces of the Russian Navy and are capable of operating in the distant sea and ocean zones, both singly and as part of the groupings,” the message says.
Photos used:
http://navsource.narod.ru
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Abbra
    Abbra April 13 2016 08: 58
    +2
    BOD entered the fleet in 1986. More than one year will serve. Moreover, as I understand it, it was not in vain that they put it on the current repair: they filled it with new developments ...
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother April 13 2016 09: 09
      +5
      As a result, a year was added to the completion date of the repair. A whole year, Karl!
      Can this be considered an achievement?
      November 14th, 2013
      As a result, the state contract R / 1/8/0476 / GK-13-DGOZ for the repair of the Tributs was concluded on September 27 with Zvezda as the sole contractor. As part of it, on October 7, an agreement was signed with Dalzavod as a co-executor for maintenance and repair work with an extension of the overhaul periods. The cost of work, compared with an open tender, decreased to 1,831 billion rubles. But the term of work spilled for six months - until July 30 2015 Information about this was posted by Zvezda on the procurement site at the end of October.

      http://bmpd.livejournal.com/660055.html
      1. cniza
        cniza April 13 2016 09: 23
        +3
        Quote: Abbra
        BOD entered the fleet in 1986. More than one year will serve. Moreover, as I understand it, it was not in vain that they put it on the current repair: they filled it with new developments ...


        Excellent technique, will serve to defend the glory of Russia.
        1. Dangerous
          Dangerous April 13 2016 11: 20
          +10
          How touching such comments are!)))) Excellent, best, etc.))) The best can be Armata, S-400, T-50, excellent Su-35, T-90, Kalashnikov and so on. But BOD 1155, with obsolete missile torpedoes and without the means to destroy surface ships, is an anachronism, albeit with a displacement of 7500 tons
          1. Roman 11
            Roman 11 April 13 2016 19: 29
            0
            Quote: Dangerous
            How touched by such comments!)))) Excellent, best, etc.))) The best may be

            The best criticism! laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 13 2016 09: 14
      +4
      And what about the modernization of these ships? Chirkov, for a long time, somehow promised to rearm them in Caliber / Onyx and S-400F (!). What, again, not fate? Although it seems that Uranus is going to put on some of the BOD what
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 April 13 2016 09: 32
        +11
        Large air defense systems there is no place, nowhere to put. Only if you cut the premises, and this is to disassemble the entire ship. That is, work as in Nakhimov, if not more.

        Onyxes - well, they decided not to install it, although inclined launchers exist, albeit in prototypes. UKKS again nowhere to put.

        2 farms will be welded to Marshal Shaposhnikov on 8 X-35. It will be by the 2018 year, when Shaposhnikov out of repair.
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 13 2016 11: 19
          0
          Hence the simple conclusion - the ship does not have modernization capabilities, it was built in the 80s, when the United States already began to build multipurpose ships with a VPU, which means that Project 1155 is outdated on the stocks (as well as etc. 956, and others by the way) It's sad, but this ship is ... but. "Lada four."
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 April 13 2016 09: 19
      +8
      No, there are less than 2 billion rubles. There will be no new products on it, the usual VTG, the extension of the overhaul periods, will be transferred to a new base only if posts (instead of alarms and CRT televisions from 80's, LCD screens, etc.) are updated with electronic warfare, they will buy Baguir (for fire 100mm and 30 mm guns at a new level of quality), the dagger will be removed, rockets will be sent to the factory (that is, cracking the fuel for many people is a disaster, age rockets) well, you have to watch the contract.

      The first, with the changes that are visible with a simple look, will be Marshal Shaposhnikov in the 2018 year.
    4. Bronis
      Bronis April 13 2016 09: 35
      +3
      Quote: Abbra
      saturated with new developments.

      repair and restoration of technical readiness - not modernization. so not yet
    5. Leto
      Leto April 13 2016 09: 49
      +6
      Quote: Abbra
      saturated with new developments ..

      Vain hopes ... Regular scheduled repairs.
  2. alexvdv78
    alexvdv78 April 13 2016 09: 00
    +2
    Lazarev must be returned to duty!
  3. Dam
    Dam April 13 2016 09: 01
    +1
    Well, one ship of the 1st rank has become more. Unfortunately, we still have a few
  4. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich April 13 2016 09: 05
    +6
    Well, BOD is the same destroyer, for lack of it ... of course the weapons are rather weak.
    1. mvg
      mvg April 13 2016 11: 38
      +2
      The concept destroyer - implies the presence of zonal air defense. Fort-M or analogs, SM-2, Aster15 / 30, Barak-8 ... And also anti-ship missiles .. Pr 1155 has nothing .. This is not an alternative to either Burke, or Type 45, nor to Horizons with LaFayette, nor Moreover, South Korea and Japan ..
      Let’s say frankly, there are no destroyers in the fleet .. AUG air defense will provide us simply, 1164 and 1144 have very limited air defense capabilities, and we don’t need to count missiles (as many as 64 pieces), we need to look at the channels, at the possibility of repelling attacks from different directions, simultaneous combat against UAVs, anti-ship missiles, and pilot aircraft.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA April 13 2016 12: 06
        +3
        Quote: mvg
        The concept destroyer - implies the presence of zonal air defense. Fort-M or analogues, SM-2, Aster15 / 30, Barak-8 ...

        EM "Spruens" look at this statement with bewilderment. smile
        Quote: mvg
        As well as RCC .. Pr 1155 has nothing ..

        "Rastrub-B" is considered a universal complex.
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 13 2016 12: 30
        +1
        Quote: mvg
        The concept destroyer - implies the presence of zonal air defense.

        not only, but also powerful anti-submarine weapons, and anti-ship missiles ...
      3. Roman 11
        Roman 11 April 13 2016 19: 38
        -1
        Quote: mvg
        1164 and 1144 have very limited air defense capabilities

        Tin, the fleet from the air cannot defend itself ... we cover the Su-35, Mig-31, and there the T-50 and Mig-35 will catch up. soldier
  5. gabonskijfront
    gabonskijfront April 13 2016 09: 16
    +1
    Do you know what makes the Soviet, Admiral Tributz and Marshal Blucher related? Both ancestors had serfs, who, at the whim of the master, were given German surnames. Such obscurantism.
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 13 2016 19: 46
      0
      Quote: gabonskijfront
      which is related to the Soviet, Admiral Tributs and Marshal Blucher

      True, the marshal was legendary, which only Perekop is worth ...... The admiral was noted as the most deafening catastrophe on the sea - the Tallinn crossing, which eclipsed Tsushima! But almost no one remembers the savior of the fleet Shchastny. Is that fair?
  6. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 13 2016 09: 21
    +3
    Recently, after all, he also caught pirates along the way. I wonder to myself where Vladivostok is, and where is the Indian Ocean with the Gulf of Aden.
  7. Kibl
    Kibl April 13 2016 10: 24
    +4
    Modernization is great, but where are the new ships, where are they? BOD for 30 years! Another 5 years pass, and then? You don’t fight a lot on missile boats and corvettes! Is this all tactics and where is the strategy?
    1. Mareman Vasilich
      Mareman Vasilich April 13 2016 10: 41
      +4
      Comrade, this is capitalism. The country has anti-Sovietism and anti-Stalinism, but a paradox, the whole country and the current government rests on everything Soviet. Comrade, look for an example with what speed ships were built during the union, and in what quantity, and then see how it is now. In a normal person, his hair stands on end.
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 April 13 2016 11: 57
        +2
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        Kamrad, look for an example with what speed ships were built during the union, and in what quantity, and then see how now

        Kamrad, in the Russian Empire in 7 years 4 "Sevastopol" and 3.5 "Empresses" were built ... and?
        Quote: Mareman Vasilich
        In a normal person, his hair stands on end.

        A normal person’s hair stood on end in 90, but now it’s a normal hairstyle bully
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA April 13 2016 12: 09
          0
          Quote: Serg65
          Kamrad, in the Russian Empire in 7 years 4 "Sevastopol" and 3.5 "Empresses" were built ... and?

          And the Empire lost the WWI due to the exhaustion of internal strength and the collapse of the railway.
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 April 13 2016 14: 06
            +1
            Quote: Alexey RA
            And the Empire lost the WWI due to the exhaustion of internal strength and the collapse of the railway.

            what Oh, Alexei, so the USSR lost in the Cold War unfortunately .... but you understand that this is not about that. What is happening in the country is very similar to the 30 of the last century.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA April 13 2016 19: 12
              +1
              Quote: Serg65
              What is happening in the country is very similar to the 30s of the last century.

              Yes. The question is - what is ahead: 1937 or immediately 22.06.1941? what
              1. Serg65
                Serg65 April 14 2016 04: 39
                +1
                Quote: Alexey RA
                The question is - what is ahead: 1937 or immediately 22.06.1941?

                Hmm, if 37 were ahead, then the ships would now bake like pies bully . But how many will like the 37?
                Quote: Alexey RA
                or immediately 22.06.1941

                From prison and from sumy do not renounce! hi
            2. Roman 11
              Roman 11 April 13 2016 20: 02
              0
              Quote: Serg65
              Oh, Alexei, so the USSR lost the Cold War unfortunately ....

              I didn’t lose, but the guarantor himself betrayed him !! Unbelievable but true.....
        2. Mareman Vasilich
          Mareman Vasilich April 13 2016 21: 30
          0
          So it is in the Russian Empire, and now the ship is made for three years and cannot be done.
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 April 14 2016 04: 41
            +1
            Quote: Mareman Vasilich
            and now the ship is being made for three years and cannot be made.

            Yuri, I’m sorry, why can’t they? What are the reasons? What do you think about this mareman?
            1. Mareman Vasilich
              Mareman Vasilich 27 May 2016 11: 34
              0
              State system. Everything is sharpened by profit, everything is tied to greed, money. The second point is impunity, entailing irresponsibility.
    2. Roman 11
      Roman 11 April 13 2016 19: 58
      0
      Quote: KIBL
      where is the strategy?

      It is simple - we are a land power! And this is correct, given our territory. The first thing is airplanes and the army, and the fleet on the residual principle. We are not Japan and England, and there are no colonies overseas. Especially since the USA does not carry out aggressive expansion. And yet a fleet is needed, a strong, compact modern one.
  8. Verdun
    Verdun April 13 2016 10: 24
    +2
    The return of such a ship into operation after the necessary repairs is necessary. Moreover, we now obviously have not enough ships of this class. even if there were no major upgrades, a planned repair is also a necessary thing. It will last longer.
  9. Demeter
    Demeter April 13 2016 13: 14
    +2
    The good news is that the powder must be kept dry and the equipment is in full combat readiness.
  10. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 27 May 2016 11: 41
    0
    Quote: Serg65
    Kamrad, in the Russian Empire in 7 years 4 "Sevastopol" and 3.5 "Empresses" were built ... and?

    And in the USSR for 7 years, only TFR 1135 was built 15 pieces, not to mention other projects.