Military Review

Washington still does not intend to provide guarantees of non-directional missile defense system against the Russian Federation

64
The United States and NATO do not intend to give any legally binding guarantees of non-directionality of the European missile defense system against the Russian Federation, since this will make it impossible to develop the system in accordance with the growing threats, reports RIA News Statement by Assistant Secretary of State Frank Rose




“What Russia is asking will significantly limit our ability to respond to nuclear threats. North Korea and Iran have repeatedly launched missiles, and the threat from these countries dictates the need to keep up with their evolving technologies, ”said Rose.

“In addition, America intends to insist on the mobility of the missile defense system. This will allow us to respond more effectively to increasing threats, ”he stressed.

Washington has repeatedly stated that EuroPRO is not aimed against Russia, but has always refused to back up its words with guarantees.

Moscow, in turn, insists that "guarantees should be fixed on paper, in a legally binding form, and not in words"

Photos used:
https://ruposters.ru, РИА Новости
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Good cat
    Good cat April 12 2016 19: 05
    +20
    Yes, it’s funny already, everyone understands that it is directed against us, what guarantees are there ???
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 12 2016 19: 11
      +32
      Quote: Good cat
      What guarantees are there ???

      Well, did the Pact in 41 help a lot? It is surprising to me that everyone rushes about with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime. request
      1. demo
        demo April 12 2016 19: 30
        +14
        It seems to me that for such a long period of time getting the butcher out of obligations not to fuck you with an ax on the head is a waste of time.
        It’s easier and more accessible.
        And that cinema is rather weak for us?
        Well, not Hollywood, but we can also make films.
        It is enough for our talented directors to order films with a clear and accessible plot where they will show what will happen to those countries that provoke the redirection of our weapons of retaliation to their cities.

        Maybe then their people will finally come to their senses and express themselves quite definitely about whether they need it or not.

        They must understand that our Strategic and Tactical nuclear forces are not Libyans with Syrians.
        You can’t send back to Turkey.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm April 12 2016 19: 43
          +4
          What the hell I was twisting their "guarantees"!
          At least 100000000000 ........ guarantees!
          One hell - I won’t believe it!
          I GUARANTEE!


          PS: TESTED.
          mines - IS !!!
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana April 12 2016 21: 53
            +2
            Vladimirets
            It is surprising to me that everyone rushes about with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime.

            It is precisely that, in the unipolar world, after the collapse of the USSR, international law began not to cost a dime - and this is extremely dangerous.
            Our authorities are well aware that the threat of an attack by the collective West in the person of NATO, led by the Pentagon and Washington’s initiative, is directed against Russia. But it is necessary to speak and hammer the West and the USA about the need to comply with INTERNATIONAL LAW. This is a deterrent against the war, which the globalists in the person of the United States resist.
            Here's the thing. It is possible to save the world and prevent the 3rd world war only when the world has at least 2 equal centers of power. This means that these 2 centers of power - two countries - have such armed forces that are capable of delivering an adequate destructive retaliatory strike to the enemy. This is precisely the limiting factor against the outbreak of war, and treaties to comply with INTERNATIONAL LAW relieve the tension of the moral confrontation of opponents against each other. So it was when the USSR existed, and the world was bipolar. After the collapse of the USSR, the world became unipolar - and the United States began to dictate its will to all other countries, violating all the norms of INTERNATIONAL LAW.
            Now, under Putin, the situation is changing. And the US globalists really dislike this. They are in a hurry and demonize Russia in the eyes of the world community of those countries that they want to use as a lightning rod from a retaliatory strike by Russia in the event of an attack on the Russian Federation.
            The US’s flagrant refusal to conclude this agreement exposes the United States to its victims in Europe, which the United States has prepared for the role of a blood strip from Russia's retaliatory strike against the United States in the war launched by the United States against Russia.
            But this is not enough. And an offer demo using Russian cinema and releasing a revealing film about the consequences of the collective West’s war with Russia at the initiative of the USA for the EU countries and other NATO countries is a great idea! I support! Cinema is a great weapon of mass propaganda.
            demo
            It’s easier and more accessible. ... do we have a weak movie? Well, not Hollywood, but we can also make films.
            It is enough for our talented directors to order films with a clear and accessible plot, which will show what will happen to those countries that provoke the redirection of our weapons of retaliation to their cities.
        2. Major Yurik
          Major Yurik April 12 2016 21: 02
          +3
          WHO WILL BELIEVE YANKES- THAT AND TWO YEARS WILL NOT LIVE !!! (With a warning to the world, Gaddafi, Hussein, and hundreds of thousands of residents of the East of the East!) am
        3. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer April 12 2016 22: 12
          +3
          Of all the guarantees in the modern world, only one deserves attention - the guaranteed destruction of the United States in the event of a global conflict with Russia.
      2. Altona
        Altona April 12 2016 19: 52
        0
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Well, did the Pact in the 41st help a lot?

        --------------------
        By the way, if you fool a Western man in the street, then the picture presented is logical in its own way. They say that the defense was created echeloned in order to catch the missile at different parts of the trajectory. If you look from Russia, it is illogical against these threats and is directly projected on us instead of Iran. Therefore, can you really not bother with the thesis "US missile defense is directed against Russia, if you replace the SM-3 with cruise missiles", but build an asymmetric response and troll this missile defense with your own electronic warfare means to cause it to malfunction?
      3. Blackmokona
        Blackmokona April 12 2016 20: 01
        0
        A guarantee is not a legal piece of paper, but an agreement that obliges NATO to remove and not to place any funds that can shoot down missiles from any countries that Russia does not recognize as aggressive. Read in detail about guarantees and what exactly require wink
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Foofighter
          Foofighter April 14 2016 05: 47
          0
          it’s not even a legal piece of paper ...
      4. meriem1
        meriem1 April 12 2016 20: 03
        0
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Good cat
        What guarantees are there ???

        Well, did the Pact in 41 help a lot? It is surprising to me that everyone rushes about with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime. request


        This is another matter. All dogs are hung on us and accused of aggression. With a document, everyone will be clear who the aggressor is ... Well, it's after. When phishington covers the tsunami.
      5. Aleksey_K
        Aleksey_K April 12 2016 20: 20
        +3
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Good cat
        What guarantees are there ???

        Well, did the Pact in 41 help a lot? It is surprising to me that everyone rushes about with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime. request

        These guarantees are needed later, when the aggressor is defeated and the whole world calls the aggressor the first to attack his victim. After that, all countries will be forced to review the entire history of the development of the aggressor, that is, the United States. Recognize your unseemly role and recognize Russia as RIGHT! This will enable Russia to become a leading power in the New World.
      6. Bkmz
        Bkmz April 12 2016 20: 26
        0
        You just need a real document, which mattresses will violate officially, so that, as they say, they do not pay off.
      7. Aleksander
        Aleksander April 12 2016 22: 24
        0
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Well, did the Pact in 41 help a lot? It is surprising to me that everyone rushes with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime


        And it's good that there are no guarantees - the leaders have fewer illusions. And then it will begin: "We were deceived, but what about the guarantees ?!"
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain April 12 2016 19: 17
      +10
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      Well, if they had given guarantees .. whoever you would have believed? belay

      Here Gorbachev believed the oral guarantees of the West that NATO would not expand east and the country was not on the doorstep. Mattress workers need to poke their nose in print and signatures like naughty cats, and it’s not a fact that these hypocrites will abide. An example with the same agreement on ABM from 1972, the mattresses were simply thrown into the trash bin, they have no faith. request
      1. PROKHOR
        PROKHOR April 12 2016 19: 24
        0
        Russia is 100% guaranteed to answer ... And it warms the soul! And then the fittest will survive .. You made the bear angry, gentlemen ... (and don’t drive us back to the den ..))))
      2. Kasym
        Kasym April 12 2016 19: 28
        +4
        It’s in vain that the “Status-6” project was “spotted” in the Kremlin - no missile defense system will help. Moreover, in the United States, all important cities are located on the coast. hi
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 12 2016 22: 09
          0
          As long as this super torpedo reaches the US coast - the war is already over - the ICBM is faster, and there will be no use for this torpedo.
          1. Kelwin
            Kelwin April 13 2016 02: 17
            0
            It depends on the launch point, and this is not the main thing. The very possibility of receiving unacceptable damage as a result of breaking one combat unit, any, is a deterrent. The mattresses are raging because they slapped the moment of restoration of our shock potential. It doesn’t matter that they know reliably and that we can reliably, it is important that there is some likelihood of snagging off so that the doctor will no longer help. And according to their throwing, they are afraid, therefore they stir up the water, hoping to find some other, not a forceful option.
    3. Gray brother
      Gray brother April 12 2016 19: 32
      0
      Quote: Good cat
      What guarantees are there ???

      Guarantees can only be in the form of Russian ICBMs, which are guaranteed to overcome this missile defense.
      Otherwise, the mattresses will decide that power is behind them, and when they think so you know what happens.
    4. HERMES
      HERMES April 12 2016 20: 21
      0
      The demons walled up with their missile defense ... so that the "live" aviation would shit them with their installations.
    5. Blondy
      Blondy April 13 2016 00: 57
      0
      Yes, even if they gave it, what's the difference. The gentleman gave a guarantee, the gentleman took a guarantee. They got out of the missile defense system, they will "dispose of" the same plutonium in their own way, NATO was moved east to the borders - they also promised something there.
  2. Bath
    Bath April 12 2016 19: 05
    +5
    What is the talk about? What guarantees in our time, who about what and lousy about the bath helped guarantees Yanukovych?
  3. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental April 12 2016 19: 09
    +3
    Well, if they had given guarantees .. whoever you would have believed? belay
  4. Oleg Lavrov
    Oleg Lavrov April 12 2016 19: 11
    +1
    USA and warranty? !! Well amused !! laughing Also say that they will keep their promises. to really burst out of laughter !! laughing
  5. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 April 12 2016 19: 11
    0
    And there’s nothing to talk about. In any case, any American warranties and representations will not be worth the paper on which they are written.
    1. quote
      quote April 12 2016 19: 37
      0
      Quote: olimpiada15
      US warranties and representations will not cost the paper on which they are written.

      Especially if they, in plain sight, are wiped with it, smiling and not embarrassed.
  6. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 April 12 2016 19: 12
    +1
    Washington still does not intend to provide guarantees of non-directional missile defense system against the Russian Federation

    Who would doubt that?...
    But in fact, everything is clear to everyone, but to talk about it, no, no. We ask for guarantees as if we believe in their inviolability. In fact, at the first opportunity, all these promises, even if recorded on paper, will be easily violated. You don’t have to go far for an example - you can recall the guarantees of the Foreign Ministers to the then President of Hohland
  7. vglazunov
    vglazunov April 12 2016 19: 13
    0
    There are no guarantees even in the morgue and they will be deceived there.
  8. hammer stalker
    hammer stalker April 12 2016 19: 18
    0
    Yes, we do not need their guarantees. And so everything is clear against us there is a war. We have one option to win, we must stick together. Brush with missiles, tanks, radars, airplanes and other technical wonders. Only competent professionals are needed. There is one example: I live in Bratsk, and a fire broke out in the last house, our right-bank firefighters arrived there were curves like sabers, there was no pressure, they were running something off topic, they were making a fuss. Until then, a cloud of fire trucks arrived from Padun. As a result, the house burned down, although it was possible to save, but as they say if my grandmother had a bolt, then it would be a grandfather. Well, like that!
  9. hartlend
    hartlend April 12 2016 19: 20
    +1
    For violation of written guarantees, you can also attract. For example, in the international (between the peoples of Russia and Belarus) Anadyr tribunal.
  10. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx April 12 2016 19: 28
    +1
    What guarantees they give, at least one hundred guarantees, to believe, not to respect themselves. In my opinion, it is necessary to declare at the highest level that the countries that agreed to deploy missile defense elements are a direct threat to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Russian Federation and therefore priority goals for our nuclear weapons. It is necessary that they firmly realize that they will die first, without options and hopes, that they are just pieces of cheap cannon fodder. That's something like that.
  11. Svetovod
    Svetovod April 12 2016 19: 31
    0
    Therefore, they probably want to be present in the Arctic. There is a "hole".
  12. Flinky
    Flinky April 12 2016 19: 32
    +1
    There is no need to demand any guarantees. Their guarantees are not worth the paper on which they are written (a very recent example is the "disposal" of weapons-grade plutonium in Matrasna). It is necessary to develop a new military doctrine, in which it should be specifically pointed out that the primary targets in the event of a full-scale conflict will be precisely the countries that had the stupidity to host a mattress missile defense system.
  13. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k April 12 2016 19: 33
    0
    Nazi Germany and the USSR signed a non-aggression pact in 1939, which to some extent caused the tragic events of 1941-1942 because Stalin thought that he had deceived Hitler, relaxed ... so that guarantees and non-guarantees do not guarantee anything.
  14. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST April 12 2016 19: 34
    0
    Against zusuls.
  15. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 12 2016 19: 37
    -1
    The United States understands only the power opposing them.
    Russia needs to build military facilities in friendly countries. At least the same tracking stations, revive work in Cuba for wiretapping of the USA, etc.
  16. pofigisst74
    pofigisst74 April 12 2016 19: 44
    0
    Yes, anyone already understands that missile defense in Europe is against us. It’s closer to North Korea to shoot through the Pacific Ocean, to us - through the North Pole, and for us it’s from Europe! request
  17. raid14
    raid14 April 12 2016 19: 53
    +1
    All the promises of the West, verbal and legally binding contracts, are not worth a penny. Gorby and Shevardnadze, after the unification of Germany, "our Western partners" made promises not to expand NATO to the East, at least from the ABM Treaty, the United States withdrew unilaterally, NATO wiped its feet about the CFE Treaty, the United States unfoundedly accuses us in violation of the INF Treaty, how much can you be naive.
  18. sieras
    sieras April 12 2016 19: 54
    +2
    estimate. After all these guarantees, they began to bomb Russia, but our missiles do not reach. and the person in charge calls from a bunker under the ashes of cities and starts shouting into the phone to the Americans "we have guarantees from you, we will judge you for this" whine whine "in the humane European court."
  19. Sergerius
    Sergerius April 12 2016 19: 55
    +4
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/820/pvfg863.jpg
  20. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 12 2016 20: 06
    0
    I think that all those participating in "VO" have successfully graduated from the kindergarten long ago. Even prints on the keyboard are not worth discussing.
    So GDP is right, it is necessary to arm yourself, LITERALLY. soldier
  21. Panabebis
    Panabebis April 12 2016 20: 24
    -2
    160km the height of the missile defense. And our ICBMs can’t fly higher? So is it all a lie that we are destroying the Amer’s missile defense system there, if the hesitation is shaking?
  22. podgornovea
    podgornovea April 12 2016 20: 34
    0
    Yes, we must be glad that they do not give guarantees!
    Will give a "guarantee", now please cut something down!
    And then: "the situation has changed! Russia does not respect the rights (Ukraine, pedirastors, IS, Erdogan, and in general your athletes use meldonium! .....), we withdraw from the agreement" ABM, guarantees, .... "
    Swam know!
    For those who did not swim - see how they threw us with a missile defense treaty!
  23. iouris
    iouris April 12 2016 20: 35
    +1
    Warranties from Washington? They made fun.
  24. AlexTires
    AlexTires April 12 2016 20: 37
    +1
    Russia is not tired of asking the United States for any guarantees that no one will ever give and which, in principle, guarantee nothing? Isn’t it zapadlo, otherwise everything is reaching for as much as how many missile defense systems are building? Maybe it’s easier to openly threaten to sprinkle dust all over Europe with dust, so that for the last time you think properly and maybe forever fall behind?
  25. knyazru
    knyazru April 12 2016 20: 50
    +1
    And if they gave guarantees, that someone else believes them?
  26. A.Anatol
    A.Anatol April 12 2016 21: 10
    +1
    Need to create an official website wink , with a list of the exact coordinates of the targets
    (easily orienting social activists) what missiles will be aimed at
    with nuclear warheads, and at every new location,
    edit list with notification population of the country of placement
  27. Yves762
    Yves762 April 12 2016 21: 16
    0
    The topic of "guarantees" is out of hand. An instrument of information warfare, now from Our side, no more.

    tongue Gee-gee-gee .... And Russia can guarantee that its integrated air defense system, with the claimed TTX, is de facto incapable of solving missile defense problems ??? Otherwise, it is not fundamentally different from missile defense ... This means that the United States has reasons to symmetrically demand "guarantees" ... wassat
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher April 13 2016 04: 22
      0
      No ..! The law WILL be, IF, if the Russian air defense will be in Mexico, Canada and a number of island states ...
  28. Delink
    Delink April 12 2016 21: 20
    0
    If you do not want to provide guarantees that we have not rested in one place, then it is worth continuing to fulfill the plans for defense and nuclear deterrence.
  29. biserino
    biserino April 12 2016 21: 23
    +1
    And so:

    The Russian Federation still does not intend to provide guarantees of a missile defense system against eastern Europe..


    how do we feel in this situation?
  30. biserino
    biserino April 12 2016 21: 40
    0
    Immolate the demons with their missile defense ... so that "live" aviation shit them their installations


    NATO is not your Syria to fight the Papuans who do not have aviation and air defense systems.
  31. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 12 2016 21: 41
    +1
    Maybe stop doing bad things with your bodies? Add to the doctrine of RUSSIA a clause that countries having a missile defense system in the 1000 kilometer zone from Russia's borders are subject to destruction without warning in case of conflict with a NATO country
  32. akudr48
    akudr48 April 12 2016 21: 57
    0
    Washington still does not intend to provide guarantees of non-directional missile defense system against the Russian Federation

    And it’s good to hear such honest statements from the adversary.

    But now, so that there are no illusions of these Eurosisters, in whose territory the missile defense systems are deployed, it is also necessary to honestly declare to Russia that these missile defense installations will be the primary targets for a preemptive nuclear strike in the event of hostilities.
  33. volodya
    volodya April 12 2016 22: 04
    +2
    Quote: Dmitry Potapov
    Maybe stop doing bad things with your bodies? Add to the doctrine of RUSSIA a clause that countries having a missile defense system in the 1000 kilometer zone from Russia's borders are subject to destruction without warning in case of conflict with a NATO country

    Listen, and you didn’t come up badly. You have to do it!
  34. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov April 12 2016 22: 08
    0
    Moscow, in turn, insists that "guarantees should be fixed on paper, in a legally binding form, and not in words"

    For this purpose, they conclude contracts so that later they can withdraw from them! You might think,
    concluding a contract will give us some kind of security guarantee. Not at all
    her illusion. All wars began, despite the concluded non-aggression treaties.
  35. biserino
    biserino April 12 2016 22: 11
    0
    Quote: akudr48



    it is also necessary for Russia to honestly declare that these euro-sisters, in whose territory the missile defense systems are deployed, that in the event of hostilities these missile defense installations will be the primary targets for a preemptive nuclear strike.


    There, in the pure models available in the event of a nuclear conflict, how many missiles will fall into Moscow and St. Petersburg, let's be realistic, the war is beautiful only in the movies ... Russia will not beat the United States - at least let it rub the nose of Eastern Europe, there are fools that we were allies for 40 years and made a socialist model with us. Give them first to destroy them!
  36. Vadim237
    Vadim237 April 12 2016 22: 13
    0
    Something in the description of the US missile defense did not say a word about the GBI missiles.
  37. Verdun
    Verdun April 12 2016 22: 52
    -1
    Quote: Bkmz
    You just need a real document, which mattresses will violate officially, so that, as they say, they do not pay off.

    What for? So that later they would be poked into our faces, like the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?
  38. witch
    witch April 12 2016 23: 28
    0
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Quote: Good cat
    What guarantees are there ???

    Well, did the Pact in 41 help a lot? It is surprising to me that everyone rushes about with these guarantees when international law is not worth a dime. request


    and who later, if the mattresses succeed in blocking our missiles, they will show something to them, because then they will fly off the coils and do whatever they want, in reality no one will be able to withstand them anymore. one approach, God forbid, of course, that Europe together with the missile defense would simply turn to dust only because they don’t leave us any other way.
  39. atamankko
    atamankko April 12 2016 23: 43
    +1
    They didn’t create it in order to give guarantees.
  40. Prisoner
    Prisoner April 12 2016 23: 55
    +1
    If given? Would our leadership, having received such guarantees, seriously take them? The American government is still the skiers. One of them is useful, that our authority is unwittingly their vileness, but they have cured of children's naivety. So everyone will do what he sees fit.
  41. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 13 2016 02: 50
    0
    We ask for guarantees; they do not provide them to us.
    Accordingly, our hands are also untied in terms of response.
    We are not idle after another refusal to give guarantees.
    We will soon have "Sarmat", "Rubezh", "Barguzin".
    It’s a very clear answer to their actions.
  42. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 April 13 2016 07: 47
    0
    Is there really at least one idiot who believes that these missile defense systems are not directed against Russia?
  43. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 13 2016 09: 29
    +1
    It is time to return to Cuba, install systems in Chukotka and negotiate with countries south of Mexico, naturally not forgetting the oceans. And pretend to be deaf type - what are you saying, do not say anything, but to me what the hell are you saying.
  44. ARS56
    ARS56 April 13 2016 10: 00
    +1
    Does Medvedev still ask for guarantees of missile defense against Russia, which was created specifically against Russia? Guarantees, the price of which, even when received, will not be worth the paper spent on them?
    Who are they trying to make fools of? Even enemies - Americans value the intelligence of our people higher than their own "rulers" and do not try to fool so primitively.
  45. Demeter
    Demeter April 13 2016 13: 41
    0
    Russia should not raise the issue of guarantees not to use the US missile defense against the Russian Federation, words, it’s a breeze, but generous to the US words ... Russia should raise the question that the US missile defense should not be at the borders of the Russian Federation, but in case of refusal by the United States The Russian Federation must take retaliatory measures of a military and technical nature
  46. Aristide
    Aristide April 14 2016 12: 46
    0
    Over the long years of "cooperation" between the United States and the USSR, and then the Russian Federation, everyone has long understood that in politics, including the statements of the United States on any issues, one cannot be trusted. The latest example is the agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation on the destruction of nuclear plutonium, when the United States, disregarding its own obligations, decided not to destroy the plutonium, but simply to bury it, which gives them the opportunity to dig it up at the right time. Contempt for their contract partners is a Yankee thing. Therefore, despite their calls to the Russian Federation to resolve issues of arms reduction, Russia needs to strengthen its military power. If you want peace, prepare for war!