Military Review

Crews of the “Bereg” complexes hit surface targets in the Black Sea

39
The coastal artillery division of the Novorossiysk naval base performed firing at surface targets, the blog reports bmpd with reference to the press service of the Ministry of Defense.


Crews of the “Bereg” complexes hit surface targets in the Black Sea


“In the course of combat firing, the crews of the 130-mm coastal self-propelled artillery systems" Bereg "fired at targets located at a considerable distance from the coast. All targets were hit by direct hits, and the complex "Coast", which is in service with the coastal forces of the Black Sea fleet, confirmed its high efficiency, ”the release said.

It is reported that "at the end of the field exit, the sailors of the coastal troops returned to the point of permanent deployment and began preparations for the upcoming military parade on Victory Day."



Help bmpd: “As part of the Russian Navy 130-mm coastal self-propelled artillery complex A-222" Bereg "is in service with the 459 of the separate coastal artillery battalion (a total of six 130 mm installations) of the 11 of the separate coastal rocket and artillery brigade of the Novorossiysk military commando unit Black Sea Fleet of Russia. The management of the brigade, formed in accordance with the decree of the President of Russia of 6 on April 2005, is deployed in the village of Utash near Anapa. ”
Photos used:
Russian Defense Ministry, channel "Russia 1"
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aviagr
    Aviagr April 12 2016 13: 14
    +6
    In the cap of NovoSiberian Navy ... Apparently still Novorossiysk ..
    1. ydjin
      ydjin April 12 2016 13: 20
      +4
      Quote: Aviagr
      In the cap of NovoSiberian Navy ... Apparently still Novorossiysk ..

      This type of probable enemy confuse! laughing Let them smash their heads! wassat
  2. igorspb
    igorspb April 12 2016 13: 15
    +6
    in one place of Novosibirsk, in another Novorossiysk, where is the truth, brother?))
  3. Azzi
    Azzi April 12 2016 13: 16
    +7
    "The coastal artillery division of the Novosibirsk naval base" (c) :))) Of course, Novorossiysk, but it sounds fresh and interesting)
  4. Alexey M
    Alexey M April 12 2016 13: 17
    +6
    I didn’t shed climbed into the wiki ...
    A-222 "Bereg" - Soviet and Russian coastal self-propelled artillery complex (artillery coastal defense system), designed to destroy small and medium surface ships, including high-speed ones, at a speed of up to 100 knots (more than 180 km / h), direct approaches to the coast - in the tidal zones, island and skerry areas, as well as to destroy ground targets. The radius of detection of targets is up to 30 km, the radius of destruction is up to 23 km.
    Cool thing landing
  5. st25310
    st25310 April 12 2016 13: 18
    +1
    Why is the caliber so rare 130 mm and not 152 mm? 152-mm abruptly would be ...
    1. ydjin
      ydjin April 12 2016 13: 33
      +5
      Quote: st25310
      Why is the caliber so rare 130 mm and not 152 mm? 152-mm abruptly would be ...

      130-mm, naval caliber, used on pre-revolutionary Novik-class destroyers, I also read that in WWII, it was used on self-propelled guns of coastal defense near Leningrad, where it showed itself well!
      1. Taoist
        Taoist April 12 2016 13: 49
        +2
        On "Noviks" were 102mm. It was already on 7x 130ki.
    2. Taoist
      Taoist April 12 2016 13: 39
      +9
      It is not rare, it is just a "sea" caliber - and the ballistics is appropriate there.
  6. gas113
    gas113 April 12 2016 13: 18
    +1
    I think "Coast" in Novosibirsk is not relevant yet laughing
    1. 528Obrp
      528Obrp April 12 2016 14: 10
      0
      so they fired at sea targets. They didn’t bother laughing
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 April 12 2016 16: 06
      +2
      Unfortunately, the "Coast" is not relevant at all in modern conflicts, think about what will happen to the "Coast" batteries, say the Republic of Samoa, if the Americans want to capture them, for example, and this "Coast" evaporates in about ten seconds, even if this complex is at least throughout the coast is in a continuous chain, it will be destroyed first of all from the distant ... yes, not even from the distant, but from about 50 km it will be destroyed, which for a modern ship is in a mess! It will not protect the coast, the detection and destruction range is too small, against single reconnaissance and sabotage boats are possible, but if a sabotage boat is noticed, it will immediately dump, since there is no point in landing! In addition, reconnaissance and sabotage raids of the enemy on small boats do not threaten Russia, we are not that country, not Samoa! the second and even more so the first rank "Coast" is absolutely useless! There are much more serious coastal defense complexes, with anti-ship missiles and launch ranges, the emphasis is on them! udia have been playing a supporting role for a long time! First, citizens cheers patriots, I am all your wink !
      1. Uncle
        Uncle April 12 2016 18: 41
        0
        That is, if America attacks Samoa, then there is no sense from the Coast. Clearly, I already thought that it was enough to acquire artillery and declare sovereignty. smile
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 April 15 2016 07: 35
          0
          If Samoa acquires a "Coast" and, for example, nuclear weapons, then why will it not need this "coast"! But without nuclear weapons, the Americans will not even have time to look at this "coast" ... they will just level the coast to the ground and that's it, they will do the same and Russia if it is necessary to capture poor Samoa!
      2. Marconi41
        Marconi41 April 13 2016 03: 58
        +1
        Quote: igorka357
        ! On the seas, artillery guns have long played an auxiliary role!

        I completely agree with you. But you can see not everywhere else Balls and Bastions rule. Yes, and which will encroach on the naval base of Novorossiysk. These installations need to be thrown all over the Crimea to the defense of the bridge under construction. The effectiveness is not great, but the very fact of their presence will reassure some ukrotatar.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 April 15 2016 07: 38
          0
          So this installation alone, I do not think that if it were as effective as the uryakalka describe here, the Ministry of Defense would refuse an order for mass production, for small mongrels it will be too expensive to put into service, for large jackals like the United States, the "coast" does not pose a threat, but then it’s not needed !! And then for some hot Turkish guys a couple of RPGs and warning shots will be enough!
  7. atk44849
    atk44849 April 12 2016 13: 25
    +1
    read about the Voroshilov battery on Russky Island.
    1. 528Obrp
      528Obrp April 12 2016 14: 13
      0
      I took the course of a young fighter there and took the oath in the 80s. As I flopped, I nearly went deaf, but there, in my opinion, 12 inches (I began to forget).
  8. maxim1987
    maxim1987 April 12 2016 13: 26
    +3
    Quote: st25310
    Why is the caliber so rare 130 mm and not 152 mm? 152-mm abruptly would be ...


    the sailors were pissed off. they say we want a "sea" caliber and not "land". And the 152-mm wheeled chassis is unlikely to withstand
    1. max702
      max702 April 12 2016 13: 59
      0
      Well, in principle, what is the wheeled chassis for? For what? Like a quick transfer to a threatened direction? Well, well..And considering that it will be necessary to work mainly on landing ships, that is, in the immediate vicinity of the means of landing assault cover, then less and less places of possible deployment of anti-amphibious weapons will be taken at least under observation, and therefore the chassis on a wheelbase will be very limited in the maneuver and the execution of the task (destruction of the landing) is in question .. But the caterpillar equipment is less demanding on this (cross-country ability is more) It seems that after all someone else played here .. The same Msta will quite perform this task for itself .. Although the MLRS is more likely Grad will cope with this task even better ..
      1. aleks26
        aleks26 April 12 2016 14: 44
        +2
        Quote: max702
        The same Msta will quite complete this task for themselves .. Although the MLRS Grad is more likely to cope with this task even better ..

        Well, does Mst have its own radar? The city does not roll here at all. If you need to cover which cutter, the most.
  9. pavelty
    pavelty April 12 2016 13: 29
    0
    Interestingly, but the shooting is conducted on some special targets? Or simply some old tub, which the tugboat dragged and threw about ten kilometers from the coast.
    1. DenZ
      DenZ April 12 2016 14: 08
      +1
      And what does this essentially affect? Is the shell more likely to fall into the old tub or into a special target?
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 April 12 2016 16: 26
        -1
        That's exactly what the projectile will not hit a special movable target, the artillery always took fire with a density of fire, for which they always tried to point fifty barrels per km of the front, one salvo-fifty shells flew, four hit ... that's how the effectiveness of the art was achieved! only along the trajectory that the barrel gave it, this is not a missile with a seeker! Say a preemption to help ... so the target is that high-speed maneuvering, reconnaissance and sabotage ship of the enemy, at a distance of twenty km ... don't tell my slippers what Artillery damn it! On land, wherever it went, all sorts of "Msty" and a whole bunch of "Carnations" "Acacia" which we have a cloud of BM in our warehouses, can create sufficient density, but two or three complexes "Bereg" nearby ... they won't do them, well, of course, there is also a theory of probability, luck, so to speak .. winked !
        1. DenZ
          DenZ April 13 2016 08: 32
          -1
          And where did you read that I am writing about a movable or non-movable target ??? An old tub cannot be a movable target? Let me disagree. And further on, your opus may not be read. The difference between movable and immovable artillery targets is clear to me even without your opus.
          1. igorka357
            igorka357 April 15 2016 07: 40
            0
            The old tub doesn’t be able to imitate a highly maneuverable high-speed target, please be respected, there was a miss in the video even on a standing target! Or maybe you didn’t notice this?
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 April 12 2016 16: 15
      +1
      This is exactly what happens, on a standing, or rather a floating, non-movable target, within the line of sight! Therefore, the "Coast" is a relic of the past, right now they will minus but it is!
      1. dauria
        dauria April 12 2016 19: 14
        +1
        Therefore, "Shore" is a relic of the past, right now they will minus


        They don’t blame, they found something to worry about.
        And about the "relic" - let it be worth it. When you get ready to land from your pelvis, 130 mm will not seem a little, maybe at least one cannon will survive, but it will work out with a competent calculation.
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 April 15 2016 07: 29
          0
          I hope that the BOD, or even better the GRKR ... which will cover our BDK, will detect and destroy the enemy’s coastal artillery battery in time, and we will land without great losses! The main thing is that the enemy wouldn’t have coastal complexes with anti-ship missiles that could destroy our cover, and then us! I hope the message is clear?
  10. Taoist
    Taoist April 12 2016 13: 38
    +1
    And these super guns are produced by us, NPO "Titan" Plant "Barricades" - in the same place where barrels for Izmailov and Unions were made.
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus April 12 2016 14: 10
    +2
    By tow, if he doesn’t have time to escape.)))
  12. Taoist
    Taoist April 12 2016 15: 39
    +5
    The main advantage of the Bereg complexes is their rate of fire with absolute accuracy and automated radar guidance. He will simply "cut" a large surface target ...

    http://topwar.ru/13064-beregovoy-mobilnyy-...-222-bereg.html


    It seems that they should be put on duty at the Kerch bridge, otherwise the "Turkish dry cargo ships" began to stray off course ...
    1. igorka357
      igorka357 April 12 2016 16: 28
      -6
      A large surface target will simply "spray" this "coast" from 40-50 km, and the "coast" will not even notice this target from such a distance, with its detection at 35 km! You thought you said that, a large surface target is destroyer-cruiser! Or did you mean dry-cargo tanker wink then yes!
      1. Taoist
        Taoist April 12 2016 16: 43
        +8
        The shore is an anti-landing weapon, again covering bridges, canals, hydraulic structures. When it is necessary to quickly stop something large (such as the Turkish bulk carrier, the Prus does not go there).
        The coast is mobile very quickly turns and folds, again it is able to fire from closed positions ... And from 40 - 50 km (if you look closely), most "probable opponents" have nothing to "spray" this complex with, let alone find it in the folds of the terrain. But in the sea, unlike the land, there are no beams and ravines ... ;-)
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 April 15 2016 07: 32
          0
          And what about the Axes amerskie, even the most ancient not modernized, spits "Bereg" three times! Or do you think that these Yaknes will save if they attack Russia?
  13. Lugan
    Lugan April 12 2016 16: 48
    0
    Powerful joke and decent caliber))
  14. okroshka79
    okroshka79 April 12 2016 17: 35
    +2
    Art complex "Bereg" is made in a single version. Information about its serial production was not passed anywhere. The caliber, ammunition and ballistics are the same as for the Project 956 destroyers. In addition to the above, the Podacha ARLS is manufactured by the Serpukhov Radio Engineering Plant, now RATEP. It was developed back in the 80s by the Design Bureau of the Saratov Radio Instrument Plant. The complex is quite relevant for specific tasks that are listed in the article and in those cases when the use of coastal anti-ship missile complexes is not advisable or possible. For example, in skerry areas. Maybe the navy would order more of them, but, obviously, "not to fat" yet.
  15. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 12 2016 18: 00
    0
    Quote: Aviagr
    In the cap of the Novo-Siberian naval base ... Apparently, nevertheless, the Novorossiysk ..

    Come on you joke over the victim of the EG! They fired from New Russia, what is not clear?
  16. Demeter
    Demeter April 13 2016 13: 47
    0
    Army exercises are always good