Russian Defense Ministry tested in Syria "smart" ammunition

48
In the course of the antiterrorist operation in Syria, the Russian military tested many types of weapons and equipment. Also gained considerable experience in the use of "smart" weapons, such as the “self-targeting combat element of SPBE-D,” reports Messenger of Mordovia.

Russian Defense Ministry tested in Syria "smart" ammunition


Such elements are equipped with cassette 500-kg aviation bombs designed to destroy enemy armored vehicles, incl. tanks.

“In the area of ​​intended targets, combat elements, descending on parachutes, scan the terrain using an infrared guidance system. When an enemy is detected, it is attacked by the so-called shock core, which is essentially a kilogram copper bar with a diameter of 173 mm, accelerated to 2000 m / s, ”explains the author of the article, Roman Katkov.



He notes that "since the roof is the most vulnerable point of any armored vehicles, even such tanks as the Abrams or the Leopard have no chance of surviving if they hit such a deadly sting." Terrorists, on the whole, have outdated armored vehicles, which “are guaranteed to turn into burning piles of scrap metal,” the author adds.



The first use of SPBE-D in Syria was recorded in October 2015 r near Aleppo.



  • imp-navigator.livejournal.com, Courage2004
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    April 12 2016 12: 17
    It would be better if they began to create third-generation ATGMs with shock nuclei, since they are so effective against the tank.
    1. +14
      April 12 2016 12: 23
      The technique of coercion to peace does not stand still
      1. +21
        April 12 2016 12: 29
        Iron arrows were used during horse attacks. Everything was destroyed and mutilated! Recognized as non-humane weapons.
        And then the question is: is a weapon in general humane?
        1. +8
          April 12 2016 12: 39
          Humanely exterminating rabid animals, which is all this Igilovskaya and other scum grown by the states. That's what is humane. And by what means this will be done, is unimportant. It is important that civilians do not suffer. And civilians do not sit in tanks and armored vehicles.
          Great ammo. I hope that in combat use shortcomings have been identified, if any, and have already been eliminated.
        2. 0
          April 12 2016 12: 54
          The arrows were used not only to destroy the cavalry, but also to block the directions of the possible attack. The arrow did not enter the ground completely, the horse stepping on the protruding part of the arrow stumbled, so that before the cavalry they had to launch sapper parts with hammers to hammer the arrows. there were Germans in WWI, so they nullified the advantage of the Russian and French cavalry
          1. +1
            April 12 2016 14: 53
            Quote: zadorin1974
            it was necessary to launch sapper parts with hammers for boarding arrows.

            Che, right and sappers walked with hammers? Did the arrows score? belay But didn’t it enter the earth to its full length? At that speed? request Strange ...
      2. +1
        April 12 2016 13: 25
        This thing was called like a flash drive.
        1. +1
          April 12 2016 15: 05
          Yes. Flashhetta. Moreover, the development is originally French.
  2. +3
    April 12 2016 12: 17
    You won’t spend this on a stand-alone technique, but donkeys do not have any accumulations of special equipment ... for now!
    Cool ammo!
    Savvy is the national treasure of Russia !!!
    1. +10
      April 12 2016 12: 30
      By the way, it seems like the same SPBE-D is used in the Smerch MLRS missiles.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        April 12 2016 12: 54
        Quote: Mihalich17
        You won’t spend it on a stand-alone technique, and donkeys do not have accumulations of special equipment ...


        So to speak - tests

        We checked in the field (desert) conditions, while there is such an opportunity



    2. 0
      April 12 2016 14: 11
      And this "bee" on the column of pickups-jeeps will work or give her a hefty "chugunin" type MBT?
  3. -5
    April 12 2016 12: 25
    Barmaley already managed to build a tank army or what? Or have our bearded men decided to test all their weapons? At this rate, it will soon reach Topol :)
    1. +9
      April 12 2016 12: 40
      Poplar is exclusively for the main headquarters; they say it is large and pentagonal.
    2. +1
      April 12 2016 12: 44
      Quote: Kalmar
      Barmalei themselves already managed to build a tank army or what?

      What does the tank army have to do with it? If tanks 1-2-3-5 are out of line of sight (there is only an approximate place), then how to destroy them if not this!
      1. 0
        April 12 2016 13: 38
        Quote: Homo
        Quote: Kalmar
        Barmalei themselves already managed to build a tank army or what?

        What does the tank army have to do with it? If tanks 1-2-3-5 are out of line of sight (there is only an approximate place), then how to destroy them if not this!


        but nothing that this is an element of the cartridge from the aircraft BOMB? how do you imagine bombing targets * out of line of sight *?
        1. 0
          April 12 2016 19: 13
          Quote: kitamo
          but nothing that this is an element of the cartridge from the aircraft BOMB? how do you imagine bombing targets * out of line of sight *?

          And what is the contradiction of my comment and yours?
        2. 0
          April 12 2016 23: 16
          But it’s nothing that if these 1-2-3-5 tanks stand at sufficient distances from each other, try to hit the tank directly with the bombs, and in these shells the accuracy of the destruction is almost exceptional ...
      2. -1
        April 12 2016 14: 34
        Quote: Homo
        If tanks 1-2-3-5 are out of line of sight

        Those. for the sake of destroying a couple of rusty T-55xs (or what do the barmaley ride there) do you need to pick up a whole bomber and spend a whole pack of expensive SPBEs (how many of them get into a 500kg bomb)? Sweeping, as for me.
        1. +3
          April 12 2016 19: 15
          Quote: Kalmar
          Those. for the sake of destroying a couple of rusty T-55xs (or what do the barmaley ride there) do you need to pick up a whole bomber and spend a whole pack of expensive SPBEs (how many of them get into a 500kg bomb)? Sweeping, as for me.

          Vyunosha! "Rusty" T-55 can put more than a dozen infantry, and small transport too! Don't compare the price of ammunition to the life of a soldier!
      3. -2
        April 12 2016 14: 34
        Quote: Homo
        If tanks 1-2-3-5 are out of line of sight

        Those. for the sake of destroying a couple of rusty T-55xs (or what do the barmaley ride there) do you need to pick up a whole bomber and spend a whole pack of expensive SPBEs (how many of them get into a 500kg bomb)? Sweeping, as for me.
        1. +2
          April 12 2016 15: 12
          And where to test on a training ground on rusty buses? They made it necessary to spend .. Test .. to bomb .. then it will be too late .. will do better .. more precisely
  4. +2
    April 12 2016 12: 25
    We do not stand still, in terms of new weapons and BP.
  5. +3
    April 12 2016 12: 30
    Application for real purposes and the result of this application will enable designers, if necessary, to modify something. So everything is done only for the benefit of our aircraft.
  6. -5
    April 12 2016 12: 33
    the disadvantage of such weapons is that the search and combat use after reset is very limited. (limited by the time of parachute fall) - but if it were in a balloon ... :)
    1. +3
      April 12 2016 12: 40
      Quote: Redactor
      the disadvantage of such weapons is that the search and combat use after reset is very limited. (limited by the time of parachute fall) - but if it were in a balloon ... :)

      This is not for searching but for aiming! Inet at least polished for decency.
  7. 0
    April 12 2016 12: 38
    And anti-tank mines do not use a strike core. in any directed action?
    1. 0
      April 12 2016 13: 00
      http://milkavkaz.livejournal.com/25846.html?thread=6134
    2. 0
      April 12 2016 13: 06
      Mostly not. The most popular to date, cumulative with a magnetic target sensor. With remote installation.

      Anti-aircraft with UY, as well as their more complex versions with an upward-firing striking element, require manual installation.
  8. -8
    April 12 2016 12: 50
    Terrorists, on the other hand, have mostly outdated armored vehicles, which "are guaranteed to turn into flaming piles of scrap metal," the author adds.

    Guaranteed? This one in the photograph and whom struck me while lying on my side? wink
    1. +3
      April 12 2016 12: 54
      Quote: professor
      Guaranteed? This one in the photograph and whom struck me while lying on my side?

      She missed the target wink
    2. +4
      April 12 2016 12: 59
      Quote: professor
      Guaranteed? This one in the photograph and whom struck me while lying on my side?

      If it finds a target, it is guaranteed to hit, and if it doesn’t find the target, it will self-destruct! Said in the video.
      1. -9
        April 12 2016 13: 02
        Quote: Lek3338
        if you do not find the target is self-destructing!

        Well? Self-destructed or became a roadside mine in the hands of militias?

        1. +3
          April 12 2016 13: 21
          She surrendered and converted to Islam.

          Or layout
        2. +5
          April 12 2016 13: 27
          Actually, this is a photo from the landfill.
          1. -18
            April 12 2016 13: 32
            Quote: Spade
            Actually, this is a photo from the landfill.

            Yes? And these lads who dismantle her on their knees, too, at the "training ground" or do you call all of Syria a "training ground"?
            1. +4
              April 12 2016 14: 03
              Amazing ignorance or just a stupid joke, I will say one thing - do not disgrace.
            2. +2
              April 12 2016 15: 34
              In the hands of a savage, any piece of iron dropped from an airplane is a CLUSTER BOMB. Indeed, they would not be disgraced in front of the whole world. Such a thing, in principle, cannot react to the heat of the human body. Here is a heated tank engine please. And these idiots are talking about "civilians" and "cluster bombs". Well, what can you take from the illiterate animals that have just climbed off the palm tree ...
        3. +2
          April 12 2016 15: 29
          Quote: professor
          or became a roadside mine in the hands of militias

          Are there any facts of using unexploded SPBE-D as "roadside" mines?
        4. 0
          April 12 2016 16: 01
          I don’t know, the professor didn’t deal with these weapons, didn’t create a mine from it, didn’t make it out, was not under her blow, just quoted the words from the video under the article. I don’t know if it is possible to kill a person from him, but such a bandura if he falls from a height of it’s possible to kill a head. Does it kill civilians? I don’t know. The only thing I know for sure is that in any war, peaceful people die in any war, although any army does this or not.
          1. 0
            April 12 2016 19: 23
            Quote: Lek3338
            I don’t know, the professor didn’t deal with these weapons, didn’t create a mine from it, didn’t make it out, didn’t under her blow, he simply quoted the words from the video under the article

            Comrades, we are not talking about anti-personnel cluster munitions, but anti-tank ones. I didn’t mix everything together in this video.

            Quote: Former battalion commander
            In the hands of a savage, any piece of iron dropped from an airplane is a CASSETTE BOMB.

            She is a cluster bomb. request

            Quote: user1212
            Are there any facts of using unexploded SPBE-D as "roadside" mines?

            Not yet.

            Quote: Muvka
            Are you sure that they ALL did not work? Or should they dissolve in air?

            They should explode, and not wholeheartedly land on a parachute.
            1. +1
              April 12 2016 19: 55
              Quote: professor
              They should explode, and not wholeheartedly land on a parachute

              Do you know how many unexploded ordnance Israel left in Gaza? And in Lebanon ten years ago? Why didn’t you care?
              1. -1
                April 12 2016 20: 01
                Quote: user1212
                Do you know how many unexploded ordnance Israel left in Gaza? And in Lebanon ten years ago? Why didn’t you care?

                There are none. Cluster anti-personnel about 15%. As intended. wink
            2. 0
              April 13 2016 13: 02
              why then a parachute?
            3. The comment was deleted.
  9. +3
    April 12 2016 14: 32
    Professor, do you also think that there are remnants of cluster munitions created to destroy manpower in the squares? or still ours were hollowing martyrs, tanks, other equipment and art? Oh yes, sorcerers, in Aleppo, where Assad’s forces are not, solid peaceful civilians, plowmen on tractors, and peaceful Protestants in hospitals ...
    1. -3
      April 12 2016 14: 50
      Quote: Absurdidat
      Professor, do you also think that there are remnants of cluster munitions created to destroy manpower in the squares?

      No. It’s monopenessial to me how you sausage these children there.

      Quote: Absurdidat
      or still ours were hollowing martyrs, tanks, other equipment and art?

      I am about "guaranteed" amazed. In this case, nothing more and nothing less.
      1. 0
        April 13 2016 12: 59
        What kind of children?
  10. -3
    April 12 2016 18: 32



    judging by this video, SPBE is generally not massively torn apart and does not self-destruct. Artel "Guarantee"?
  11. 0
    April 12 2016 19: 14
    Quote: Tlauicol



    judging by this video, SPBE is generally not massively torn apart and does not self-destruct. Artel "Guarantee"?

    Are you sure that they ALL did not work? Or should they dissolve in air? I will disappoint you, after discharge, they fall to the ground. And it is not yet known that she, who did not burst on purpose, is waiting for someone to come to admire her. I mean special modification. To the fool. I’m not saying that this is so, indeed something may have failed, but such a trick is possible.
    1. +1
      April 12 2016 20: 04
      I thought a little more, but in the video, is this not the back part? Are there any specialists? Just if you look at how the parachute lies, then it flew to the right in the first frames. And should he have gone there before?
    2. 0
      April 13 2016 05: 59
      And what is the trick of "smart special modification"? that the Banderlog is now accusing us all over the world of all mortal sins? They did not explode and did not self-destruct - that's the whole trick
  12. Hey
    0
    April 12 2016 19: 58
    And I would throw such things from a drone.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"