Washington doesn’t see a problem in that the disposal of weapons-grade plutonium in the United States means its actual storage

Scandal around Washington refusing to recycle is gaining momentum weapons plutonium, although a disposal agreement has been signed with Russia, and Russia is fulfilling its obligations. Recall that the US Senator from South Carolina (a plutonium recycling plant is located in this state, and this plant is not used today) was much surprised by the fact that the United States refused to fulfill its obligations.

In Washington, they stated that they are not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since "a cheaper option has been found." This “option” is to store weapons-grade plutonium in underground storage facilities in the form of original artificial deposits.

US Senator from South Carolina:

And this is our disposal option? In the agreement, something was said about such a possibility? .. It is strange after that to expect the Russians to agree to our conditions, because they really dispose of (“burn”) weapon-grade plutonium.

But State Department spokesman Mark Toner believes that plutonium storage is also "recycling." Mark Toner quotes RIA News:

I do not think that a change in the method of disposal necessarily requires re-negotiating this agreement. We have been communicating with 2013 of the year with Russia regarding the US revision of the disposal method and its results. This is consistent with the agreement between the US and Russia on plutonium disposal. This agreement actually allows the parties to consult and negotiate disposal methods without radiation and nuclear reactors. We are trying to fit this process.

Trying to fit and really fit is two different things.

Comments

[Stinger]

they are not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since “a cheaper option has been found”

We have even cheaper - do not destroy anything.

[The black]

Here is another proof of the hypocrisy of the United States. And how much pathos was there, that Russia does not strive for nuclear safety. In fact, 34 tons of plutonium are still in US warehouses and at any moment ready to turn into warheads.

[krot]

Once again, the statesmen are "keeping" their word. Doing business with this deceitful "nation" should be different! Enough to step on the same rake! As they, so we should do! They stole our fellow countrymen for the trial at home, we have to kidnap amers somewhere and try them, and put them in prison for 25 years. And then change!

[madjik]

the negotiability of the usa is being questioned! then is there any sense whatsoever to negotiate with them? they don’t keep their words, but they always require guarantees for themselves (which is typical for buy and sell).

[cniza]

It is time for us to adequately respond to the arrogant behavior of the United States, how much longer can we endure?

[Rostov Papa]

It is time for us to adequately respond to the arrogant behavior of the United States, how much longer can we endure?

It's really high time. It is necessary at every opportunity to poke this contract into the mug. If Russia had done so, every iron would have squealed about it. Otherwise we are discussing "in the kitchen" - these are the deceivers they are ...

[Sensatus]

I do not think that a change in the method of disposal necessarily requires negotiations on this agreement again.

I wonder what they will say if we come up with a way to dispose of weapons-grade plutonium by detonating ammunition (our ballistic missiles) in the United States? But what, does a change in the method of disposal require additional negotiations?

[alexmach]

Someone recently said this. "we agreed to come to an agreement," but it is not possible to come to an agreement with them finally. They will simply turn any treaty inside out if they think it is at odds with their interests. You can talk to them on an equal footing only by keeping them at gunpoint. There is no other way.

[WKS]

The state of dodgers and cunning, deceivers and cheaters.

[Lukich]

Quote: krot

Once again, the statesmen "keep" their word

adopted the style of cauldrons. to promise does not mean to marry. their offspring does not lag behind. we do not repay debts, signed contracts are not fulfilled

[vovanpain]

Probably it’s time for Russia to announce that since the mattress does not comply with the contract, then why should we fulfill it. And the same should be stored.

[anEkeName]

Quote: Black

Here is another proof of the hypocrisy of the United States.

The hypocrisy of the United States is already an axiom, for it does not need proof.

[GSH-18]

Recall that the US Senator from South Carolina (a plutonium recycling plant is located in this state, and this plant is not used today) was much surprised by the fact that the United States refused to fulfill its obligations.

Maybe at least THIS will open the eyes of someone else in the states to the "affairs" of their federal government?

[Izotovp]

What kind of hypocrisy? This is a feeling of superiority in which no one has yet been able to dissuade them. The arguments are not enough. Neither military nor financial. The USSR could fight the United States only because it was one large corporation comparable in power to US companies. Now we are for them the power of the economy-refueling with an exchanger and for some reason with nuclear missiles.

[State Employee]

"34 tons of plutonium are still in American warehouses and are ready to turn into warheads at any moment."

The United States destroyed the plant for the production of plutonium fuses back in 1993. Called Rocky Flats, located in Colorado, under Denver. With the destruction of the plant, the US nuclear weapons program was actually destroyed. That is why Obama is such an ardent supporter of nuclear disarmament. For details, check out planetauuu.com, chapter 4.

[GSH-18]

Quote: State Employee

was in Colorado, under Denver. With the destruction of the plant, the US nuclear weapons program was actually destroyed.

The Americans continue (and have never stopped!) Improving their nuclear weapons. Because of these "agreements" signed by the traitor to the Motherland, Gorbachev, and America's best friend Yeltsin, we are now technologically lagging behind them in this important area!

[alexmach]

because of these "agreements" signed by a traitor to the Motherland ..

Yes, it’s not a matter of contracts. Any contract can always be denounced. The collapse of the country.

[faridg7]

Quote: State Employee

The United States destroyed the plant for the production of plutonium fuses back in 1993. Called Rocky Flats, located in Colorado, under Denver. With the destruction of the plant, the US nuclear weapons program was actually destroyed. That is why Obama is such an ardent supporter of nuclear disarmament. For details, check out planetauuu.com, chapter 4

Plutonium fuses? Carry crap. to produce a charge, the supercritical mass of plutonium and a neutron source are needed. All the sophistication with the invention of ammunition comes down to the possibility of creating high-power charges (the problem is to collect a mass exceeding the critical mass) and low-power charges (making subcritical mass share). with such a quantity of weapons-grade plutonium, you can non-turn around and make simple cannon-type ammunition - for this, high technology is unnecessary. Perhaps the average graduate of a Soviet high school will be able to collect two pieces of plutonium of 2 kg each, a little explosive and a milligram of polonium or California. it’s difficult to get it all, clean it, but then they all gave it to them on a silver platter.

[Viktor_24reg]

I hope this is done. The main thing is that the liberals do not know about it

[Finches]

Perhaps we need to start warehousing ...? Yes, and in general it is better not to negotiate with the United States on issues affecting Russia's national security! The best, including nuclear security, is the availability and constant development of weapons! Only understanding of the strength makes the Yankees more less honest!

[sharp-lad]

You have developed fast reactors in your country, in which plutonium is "utilized" to generate electricity! And the "exceptional" do not have this and is not yet expected! To give Russia pride does not allow, to create their own "exclusivity"!

[SRC P-15]

It seems to me that the whole point is that the Americans lagged behind us in enriching nuclear fuel. As I heard, we have gone far from them. And now, by storing weapons-grade plutonium, the United States wants to protect itself for the future, violating the agreement concluded with us. We need to do something to thereby force the United States to comply with the agreement.

[GSH-18]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

It seems to me that the whole point is that the Americans lagged behind us in enriching nuclear fuel.

This is not true. At one time, there was a boom in the production of plutonium. This requires very serious industrial facilities. Just imagine the production process! At least hundreds of special plutonium-producing reactors, thousands of enrichment centrifuges. And this process is not fast! Then the factory facilities were dismantled as unnecessary. Therefore, we and the states have such a large supply of plutonium. Its destruction puts an end to the development and growth of the nuclear potentials of Russia and the United States. This is the meaning of the signed agreement.

[andj61]

Quote: sharp-lad

You have developed fast reactors in your country, in which plutonium is "utilized" to generate electricity! And the "exceptional" do not have this and is not yet expected! To give Russia pride does not allow, to create their own "exclusivity"!

The question is that not only American, but also our weapons-grade plutonium is stored there in the states, although it was supposed to be processed under the agreement.
This is doubly beneficial for them: we have less plutonium, and they have more. And then you can either re-fill them with bombs and warheads, or convert them into fuel for future nuclear power plants or nuclear powered ships. Putin has already made a public complaint about this.

[GSH-18]

Quote: andj61

Putin has already made a public complaint about this.

Claims here are worthless. We urgently need to stop all work on the disposal of our plutonium in the Russian Federation.
But what if americos under the guise of concocting our plutonium (which is better than American) their warheads, which ultimately will be aimed at us ???
These "friends" need to be totally controlled, they have no trust! I think the agreement contains the necessary control mechanisms.

[andj61]

Quote: GSH-18

Claims here are worthless. We urgently need to stop all work on the disposal of our plutonium in the Russian Federation.

The funny thing is that we did not dispose of it, but transferred it for fuel to nuclear power plants for disposal, for money, though the United States. So they can use it - that is, use our OU plutonium as for bombs - now it seems that they are no longer producing plutonium (although they say that there is only one reactor left in Japan), and they can also process it for fuel for nuclear power plants.

[GSH-18]

Quote: andj61

The funny thing is that we did not dispose of it, but transferred it for fuel to nuclear power plants for disposal, for money, though the United States. So they can use it - that is, OUR plutonium, like for bombs, can be used

I say:

Quote: GSH-18

We urgently need to stop all work on the disposal of our plutonium in the Russian Federation.

This also includes the transfer of our plutonium to anyone.

Quote: andj61

plutonium is already not being produced

That's right. And to establish this production again will cost the country ten to twenty Olympiads in Sochi. But the production of plutonium itself is a slow process.
We cannot give our plutonium to deceitful "partners". And if we are to dispose of it, then only by ourselves, and in parallel with the Americans!

[annodomene]

In this type of nuclear weapons, plutonium is obtained, not disposed of.

[GSH-18]

Washington doesn’t see a problem in that the disposal of weapons-grade plutonium in the United States means its actual storage

Well, if so, I suggest storing our plutonium into new nuclear warheads!

[GSH-18]

This “option” is the storage of weapons-grade plutonium in underground storage in the form of unique artificial deposits.

For reference: plutonium deposits do not exist in nature - it is a 100% synthetic element obtained in special reactors from uranium. If it is mixed with soil, so to speak, then a very strong large-scale contamination of the area will occur - both radioactive and toxic! Plutonium surpasses potassium cyanide in toxicity. For a long time it is not excreted from the body and as a result kills all living things. Well, let's, Americans, bury plutonium in the ground where the thread is near the New York water intake!

[andj61]

Quote: GSH-18

Well, let's, Americans, bury plutonium in the ground where the thread is near the New York water intake!

It is poisonous and radioactive, it only comes in special protective capsules, which are placed in special protective containers. And 100-200 years they can be quietly in them.
This is not even the question - under an agreement with the United States, Russia supplied them with weapons-grade plutonium for subsequent processing into fuel for nuclear power plants. So, apparently, they not only stored their weapons-grade plutonium instead of reprocessing, but ours too!

[GSH-18]

Quote: andj61

It is poisonous and radioactive, it only comes in special protective capsules, which are placed in special protective containers. And 100-200 years they can be quietly in them.

That is yes. But they want to dispose of it.

This “option” is the storage of weapons-grade plutonium in underground storage facilities in the form of peculiar artificial deposits.

Quote: andj61

So, apparently, they not only stored their weapons-grade plutonium instead of reprocessing, but ours too!

And this is a jamb! If this is true, then we must demand the return of our plutonium back to Russia!

[andj61]

Quote: GSH-18

And this is a jamb! If this is true, then we must demand the return of our plutonium back to Russia!

The Americans paid us money for it, but pledged to convert it into fuel for nuclear power plants. It is unlikely to be returned - it belongs to them. Here it’s only possible to demand processing, as it is written in the contract.

[GSH-18]

Quote: andj61

The Americans paid us money for it, but pledged to convert it into fuel for nuclear power plants.

It turns out that if not processed, it means violation of the contract! And here is the choice of either breaking the contract, paying us a penalty for non-compliance. And so we have the right to demand a refund.

[guzik007]

This is not even the question - under an agreement with the United States, Russia supplied them with weapons-grade plutonium for subsequent processing into fuel for nuclear power plants. So, apparently, they not only stored their weapons-grade plutonium instead of reprocessing, but ours too!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be more precise, exactly 400 tons of weapons-grade plutonium were transferred by the drunk to "friend Bill"

[vodolaz]

Well, what else to expect from them? Lying in the face for American politicians is the norm. Moreover, even in the agreement it is written how plutonium should be.

[Bath]

What a foolish person just did such an agreement signed to bring his plutonium to the United States is a direct betrayal and the contractor must be for life immediately

[guzik007]

What a foolish person just did such an agreement signed to bring his plutonium to the United States is a direct betrayal and the contractor must be for life immediately
-------------------------------------------------- ------
Yes, you cho! his cultural cent was bawdy on behalf of a grateful receiver.

[Saratoga833]

A museum was opened to those who signed this agreement in Yekaterinburg with great fanfare and were extremely proud of it!

[sherp2015]

Quote: Stinger

they are not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since “a cheaper option has been found”

"Promising is not the same as getting married"
As I understand it, plutonium is ours, which our "effective managers" fused to the Americans?

[Hagakure]

A nation of crooks, thieves and crooks ... has been and will be.

[siberalt]

Yeah. Let this wise guy ask mom to give birth to him and stay in this place of birth

[Pavel Tsybai]

Why say that. What Obama is that all his mongrels do not fulfill their words and carry eternal nonsense.

[ssergn]

So they use this "method" ..

[Red_Hamer]

The same is with them, and with carriers. Dismantling and warehousing, not destruction. Everything is subject to quick assembly.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

we cut, they hide ... everything as always.

[Aleksander]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

we cut, they hide ... everything as always.

So, maybe it's time for Russia to STOP being honest in a game with a sharpie? How many can you repeat the same mistakes?
Yes, and diplomats burst, because such a cunning move of the amers was obvious, and NOT new, it was already with missiles. Unclear (unless the eyes of the diplomats were "closed" in a known way)

[GSH-18]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

we cut, they hide ... everything as always.

So you need to stop this practice. Destroy in parallel in batches. We have not destroyed the Americas, and we will not.

[inkass_98]

If the storage where weapons-grade plutonium is stored is accidentally undermined, it will also be a kind of disposal. But the consequences of such disposal will unpleasantly surprise not only the representatives of the State Department, but also the mass of US citizens, from those who retain the ability to be surprised for a while.

[Portolan]

having given their word, hold on, and not having given strength, the agreement clearly implies the destruction of plutonium, not storage, so Americans are dishonorable people. Should we comply with any agreements with such?

[rotmistr60]

The "cunning" of the Americans knows no boundaries. "Only the grave will fix the hunchback" (Russian proverb).

[denssss]

I xs, I would cease to discuss or negotiate anything with them, I would not have the patience

[PKK]

235th plutonium, on Earth it remains k..y yes n..ya, to spoil it with madness. You can fly on the 235th in Space, therefore this metal is considered superstrategic. and 238th uranium cannot be tamed in any way, which is sad.

[Flinky]

238th uranium cannot be tamed in any way

BN-800 - heard of such a thing? Apparently not.

[andj61]

Quote: PKK

235th plutonium, on Earth it remains k..y yes n..ya, to spoil it with madness. You can fly on the 235th in Space, therefore this metal is considered superstrategic. and 238th uranium cannot be tamed in any way, which is sad.

235th plutonium generally does not exist, plutonium-238 is used - not so often, and plutonium-239 for nuclear weapons. It is also used in bombs of uranium-235 and rarely - uranium-233, but not plutonium-235.
And uranium-238 is the most common, but not fissile, isotope of uranium. But he was just "tamed" - it is from him that weapons-grade plutonium-239 is obtained in breeder reactors,

[PKK]

235 plutonium, this is of course a reservation, of course 235 uranium. On the receipt of 238 plutonium from uranium, 239 I admit I did not hear, I lagged behind in this question. A question arose, did the breeder reactors work on 238m \ uranium?

[andj61]

Quote: PKK

The question arose, did breeder reactors work on uranium 238m?

They work, of course, not on uranium-238, it is not a fissile isotope. They run on uranium 235, 233, etc. (there may be options), but rods made of uranium-238 are inserted into the reactor, from which plutonium-239 is obtained during irradiation. True, the material turns out to be "dirty", it still has to be separated from other isotopes for weapons use.

[annodomene]

U-235 is divisible, but by fast n

[andj61]

Quote: annodomene

U-235 is divisible, but by fast n

Precisely, earlier graphite was used as moderators in reactors and rods, and there were other versions of neutron moderators. And now, fast reactors have already created reactors.

[faterdom]

And we just noticed that almost everything! treaties with the Americans are either double-bottomed, or are not being fulfilled on their part, or are being carried out in a very peculiar way. How amazing they have provided Libya with "no-fly space"! Chikatilo would have hanged himself with envy that rape followed by being torn to pieces is "not allowing flights."

[Mountain shooter]

Here is not enough evil for them. The smart ones. You burn your plutonium, and we will "stock up". And if anything, we'll get it and use it. And you burn, burn ...
Found the fools!

[cccr51]

Well, is it really possible to conduct any negotiations with such shitty ones!

[demo]

In Washington, they stated that they are not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since "a cheaper option has been found." This “option” is to store weapons-grade plutonium in underground storage facilities in the form of original artificial deposits.

Wow! As former Secretary of State Clinton would say.

Sometimes it seems to me that this state is the United States, or to such an extent personifies stupidity, or absolute universal impudence.
For just a normal person can say such a thing out loud?

And if the question was about disarmament, i.e. I, for example, USA, declare that, for example, I don’t recycle tanks / for scrap, but simply send the engine to the factory for storage.
Let it be like "natural-artificial deposits".
So what?
A tank without an engine is a pile of metal?

Lord Take America away! At least somewhere!

[oxotnuk86]

That's right, how much does weapons-grade plutonium production cost? We destroy and mattresses are not fools with minimal cost will receive B / W and we again stepped on a rake like with missiles. Most touches that we are always worried about and what will be the face of the mattresses? In the world, only Russia is annoyed by this issue no one else.

[TUNISIA]

Quote: PKK

On the 235th you can fly in space,

It remains only to compose engines for space vehicles on steam traction.

[mihasik]

What do they do in normal life with such a "client" who does not fulfill his obligations? He is blacklisted, sued, "fines and penalties" removed and no longer cooperates. Why the Russian Federation, despite all the "partner's" violations, is stubbornly trying to impose its cooperation on the United States is not clear. A 90s habit? Or what does the United States owe?

[Saratoga833]

Quote: mihasik

Or what should the United States do?

We do not have to, but in fact have "stored" our financial reserve in the US financial system, which is what our financial block is proud of!

[Alexandr2637]

And we will destroy it?
Well, how many times do you need to be deceived in order to understand: Anglo-Saxons can never be trusted !!!

[solovey]

Yankees hold the whole world for loshar !!! I think as it was in the 90s it will not work with us.
True, with a correction - if the mattresses manage to change the power for the liberals, they will definitely bring to the end what was conceived in 91.

[cergey51046]

So you store. The United States cannot be trusted; they are renegades.

[Holsten]

Contracts with the Americans should be concluded only on their own principles: on the basis of deception and lies. In another they simply can not understand because of their mentality, the mentality of thieves and robbers. Let it be better to constantly be in alarming expectation - whether the Russians will fulfill the promise.

[Polite Moose]

In Washington, they said that they were not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since "a cheaper option was found."

Once again, these p ... (our American partners) showed everyone that it is impossible to do business with them honestly. Not, if such a booze has already gone, then Russia also has cheaper options for the destruction of weapons-grade plutonium. Even profitable ones. For example, transfer it to Iran, Syria or North Korea. "For storage" so to speak. Now, the Americans are going to go nuts from such frugality.

[CONTROL]

Script of a Hollywood thriller-horror thriller: - "artificial deposit" of plutonium seized by frostbitten North Korean terrorists! The efforts of Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America and others have led nowhere (maybe because they are not there? ... but there are terrorists!)! And now - the super-horror-thriller finale! Terrorists are blowing up an "artificial deposit"! Americans are surprised for a long time - as much as 8 - 12 seconds! ...
-----
A realistic scenario? Considering the dominant supermenity syndrome in the United States and the real carelessness of their special services ... when even the twin towers were normal, without questions about "imitation of a terrorist attack", they could not blow up! ...

[Alex_T]

In fast neutron reactors, plutonium is not completely destroyed, the uranium 238 used in MOX fuel for BN reactors (which is 99% of production and considered to be a waste from the production of weapons-grade 235) is converted to the same weapons-grade plutonium. Another thing is that you can’t immediately use this plutonium, it is too phonite and contaminated with nuclear fission products.

[aszzz888]

But the official representative of the State Department, Mark Toner, believes that the storage of plutonium is also "disposal".

Another gosdepovskaya beast without any glimmer of mind. And this is "exceptional"? “No, it's a gang of killers!”

[Zebus]

Burning plutonium is the same as burning a stove with banknotes ... Already there are technologies for using it as fuel for new generation nuclear reactors. Amerikosy well done !!! Pragmatists, mother of their children!

[Alex_T]

Learn the mat part. To "burn" plutonium and use it as a fuel for nuclear reactors, this is one and the same thing that the Russian Federation is doing on the BN800. And the Americans do not "burn", but dilute and store them.

[NordUral]

Rogues in the first place.

[Berber]

This whole scandal is in our hands. Of course, the fact that the United States will have plutonium and we do not have it is depressing, but the whole world has once again seen the price of contracts with the United States.

[kolexxx]

The Americans got into the trap. If plutonium is burned in conventional reactors, they will be left without weapons grade plutonium. Russia, having mastered fast neutron technology, can both burn plutonium in them and extract it if necessary, since plutonium in these reactors is an intermediate product. So the Americans are trying to maintain the return potential of plutonium in a non-contractual way.

[andj61]

Quote: kolexxx

The Americans got into the trap. If plutonium is burned in conventional reactors, they will be left without weapons grade plutonium. R

There is no trap. They and our weapons-grade plutonium received a whole bunch, and their after the reduction of warheads no less. And now they have so much, one hundred is enough, or the number of warheads is increased every 10 times, and another 200 years is enough to burn processed fuel in nuclear power plants

[Hooks]

False, duplicitous, false, rotten, rash, hypocritical Pharisee little souls.

[Nikolaev]

Ours also need to be stored, only in an iron shell - like a "rocket"!

[Kirill750]

they don’t see problems in anything, just don’t look where these creatures and problems are

[sl3]

This once again confirms that one cannot believe in him. T in a and two-faced.

[Million]

It is high time for our rulers to understand that the United States is not our friend, and we have never been a friend!

[james]

The answer is in the style of psaki and the like. Black is white, white is black and, and what's the difference

[Pvi1206]

Hypocrisy is the basis of US policy ...

[BOB044]

I do not think that a change in the method of disposal necessarily requires re-negotiating this agreement. We have been communicating with 2013 of the year with Russia regarding the US revision of the disposal method and its results. This is consistent with the agreement between the US and Russia on plutonium disposal. This agreement actually allows the parties to consult and negotiate disposal methods without radiation and nuclear reactors. We are trying to fit this process.

USA you are looking for fools among you.

[Jurkovs]

This story is only the result of another technological failure in the United States. If we had not created a fast neutron reactor, then the Americans would have built their plant and burned plutonium in uranium reactors, however, like us. But Russia created BN-800, on the one hand we are fulfilling the agreement and will burn plutonium in the reactor, on the other hand, plutonium is an intermediate in BN-800 and can always be extracted from it. Let's face it, we have a return potential that does not contradict the contract, and the Americans have to break the contract in order not to be left with a nose. And of course we will constantly pedal this story and say that the United States is not negotiable.

[evil partisan]

I have a book by Beregovoy "Angle of attack". An incredibly interesting book! Who has not read it yet - be sure to read it.

Here is a very interesting film about Coastal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkTTREXMbZI

[Verdun]

Thanks for everything, dear Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev! It would be good for us to store tanks, ships, planes and missiles in due time. And do not send for scrap.

[Atenon]

I propose a new method of disposal by undermining plutonium in the states.

[dchegrinec]

In this case, Russia also has no difficulty in "utilizing" plutonium by changing warehouses.

[NordUral]

I read somewhere that our disarmament workers from Stekanovtsy have already disposed of everything precisely by agreement. I hope that this is not so and something else can be saved.

[CRASH]

And we will destroy everything, cut it, and report to the Americans that the plan has been completed and overfulfilled.

[Belarus]

The "original" actions of the American side regarding the destruction of plutonium, in my opinion, are aimed at the superiority of the United States in the world in nuclear weapons. Namely: thus "destroying" weapons-grade plutonium to force everyone to do it and then at any time and in a short time increase it.
The Americans did not come up with anything new for themselves and act just as always - they hold the whole world for fools.

[13elf]

With all my strength I am waiting for the supervolcano to finally wake up and bury these lying creatures. They have already tired everyone. And many were killed.

[iliya87]

The United States always interprets everything as beneficial to them. In my opinion, there is no need to be surprised at such things. I am surprised how they have not yet utilized such uranium by the method of democratic utilization "by dropping nuclear bombs on" terrorists ""

[Urfin]

"Washington said that they are not going to dispose of plutonium by the method of actual destruction at an industrial facility, since" a cheaper option has been found. "This" option "is the storage of weapons-grade plutonium in underground storage in the form of a kind of artificial deposits."

They’ll play it out so much that some in One Country also decide to optimize the disposal of nuclear warheads — for example, somewhere in the Federal District of Columbia it’s much cheaper ...

[pofigisst74]

Well, that means we also need to stop utilizing plutonium in an expensive way. There is a way cheaper even than the American one. Stick on containers, or whatever it is, stickers "WASTE". And that's it!

[atakan]

Quote: krot

As they are, so must we do!

Hmm, this is the third decade of the United States
NOT CONTRIBUTIVE

[thinker]

The scandal surrounding Washington's refusal to dispose of weapons-grade plutonium is gaining momentum ...

The chic title of the article on this subject - South Carolina authorities sided with Putin.

South Carolina authorities through a court demanded that the US government comply with an agreement with Russia on the disposal of weapons-grade plutonium. They are seeking to implement the 2010 agreements on the disposal of weapons-grade plutonium with Moscow.

http://www.putin-today.ru/archives/23685

[afrikanez]

Here is the exact "DB", they can not even understand the expression - to destroy. Wry-handed hypocrites and rascals. Well, how in general with such, what to do?

[NordUral]

The essence of Anglo-Saxon politics and obligations is a scam.

[fa2998]

Quote: Black

Here is another proof of the hypocrisy of the United States.

But what does the USA have to do with it? In what sick head did the idea arise that tons of Russian plutonium should be sent abroad? Plutonium was created for BILLIONS of public money - send it to the USA! The cost of plutonium is over $4000 per gram - naturally, one ton is over 4 billion .$.We laugh that the Germans store gold in the USA, but the cost of gold is nothing compared to the cost of plutonium, it is tens of times more. Those tens of tons of plutonium are comparable to the country’s gold and foreign reserves.

[Karakuin]

Yesterday a bunch of smart people howled that we need to sell RD. Today there is something wrong with recycling again. Hey, managers, maybe stop selling defense capabilities? Why can’t you live without a rich shekel?

[7 poplar]

As usual, the Americans turned on the FOOL!

[Hammer]

Here the senators can screw up the government, but here they are only creating a “patriotometer”.

[Demeter]

In this case, it’s time for the Russian Federation to stop disposing of weapons and start storing them, since there is no difference...