Military Review

China has begun to repair the former Soviet cruiser "Minsk"

68
The former aircraft-carrying cruiser "Minsk" (project 11432), used with 2000 g in the Chinese city of Shenzhen as an entertainment and museum complex called "Park Minsk", was towed to Zhoushan to a private shipyard for redecoration, the blog says bmpd with reference to orientalist-v.livejournal.com.




“After docking and painting in Zhoushan, Minsk will be re-towed to a new parking lot at the end of April - to the Sutong Technology Park in Nantun, 100 km upstream from Yangtze from the sea, next to the huge 2008 km bridge built in 8,2 year "- said in a statement.



The park will open completely in 2017. The Chinese group of companies Yongjia Group participates in its creation. The total investment is $ 10 billion. It is noted that "the park is an ambitious megaproject, including a variety of sites and facilities, ranging from Minsk and a huge theater to the complex in honor of Marilyn Monroe."

Being Shenzhen, "Minsk" was an unprofitable object and gradually fell into disrepair. The new owners of the ship hope that it will become one of the most visited complexes in their science and technology park.

Photos used:
http://orientalist-v.livejournal.com
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Michael67
    Michael67 April 11 2016 15: 14
    +44
    Sorry for the cruiser.
    How to make it so that it becomes one of the reminders for everyone of what jumping up to the songs of "partners" from the west leads to.
    1. The black
      The black April 11 2016 15: 21
      +58
      I must say thanks to the government of shit. A vivid illustration of how they sold the country. (And, as in this case, for a penny) 30.06.93 expelled from the Russian Navy and sold for $ 4,583 million to a South Korean company, which in turn resold it to the Chinese for 5 million $
      He served only 15 years, that for the ship in general about .... sad It’s like the prosecutor’s office was doing this, but it ended with NOTHING request
      1. cniza
        cniza April 11 2016 15: 35
        +10
        There was a military unit, and now an amusement park, it’s a pity.
        1. Marconi41
          Marconi41 April 12 2016 00: 43
          0
          Quote: cniza
          There was a military unit, and now an amusement park, it’s a pity.

          "... In order not to become such a museum. At the right moment, it is better to go to the bottom ..." (Time Machine) Perhaps here I agree with Makarevich.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Stoler
        Stoler April 11 2016 21: 10
        +4
        Not the prosecutor’s office should deal with this but the executioner! am
    2. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall April 11 2016 15: 23
      +11
      Sorry - not sorry, but it is. But I still don’t understand why we need aircraft-bearing gargar. Funds are limited, so you should focus on missile submarine strategic cruisers. We are not going to wage colonial wars.
      1. Foofighter
        Foofighter April 11 2016 15: 52
        +9
        And why do we need submarine strategic missile cruisers, if they are barefaced from the air they cost almost nothing?
        And how do you see their use if you have to resolve issues far somewhere by force?
      2. Foofighter
        Foofighter April 11 2016 15: 52
        -1
        And why do we need submarine strategic missile cruisers, if they are barefaced from the air they cost almost nothing?
        And how do you see their use if you have to resolve issues far somewhere by force?
      3. Thronekeeper
        Thronekeeper April 11 2016 16: 00
        +9
        Six pieces of TAVKR with ACS would be needed as an air cover and a strike component of anti-aircraft and anti-submarine groups. Otherwise, all "Onyxes" and even "Zircons" on frigates and upgraded cruisers and frigates under construction will have a purely Mediterranean coastal slope. In the ocean, even with the S-500 instead of Favorite and Redoubt, not only will they divide, just the object pro is strong with us, but about nothing, the detection and illumination of the AUG of one MKRTs is intense, and the destruction of the APRKSN without the flyworms (4-6 more) is generally impossible ... Well, there is something hockey-like AWACS for them. And cruisers are still capable of providing missile defense in the active sector in the future.
        We do not need AB bombing the Papuans.
      4. Sergey S.
        Sergey S. April 11 2016 20: 30
        +3
        Quote: tiredwithall
        Sorry - not sorry, but it is. But I still don’t understand why we need aircraft-bearing gargar. Funds are limited, so you should focus on missile submarine strategic cruisers. We are not going to wage colonial wars.

        These ships according to the Soviet classification are anti-submarine cruisers.
        And this is almost true.
        The main purpose is to ensure control of the sea in the deployment area of ​​SSBNs.

        I suppose that the presence of such ships in pairs in the Northern and Pacific Fleets would be beneficial for the case in the coming times.

        Sorry for the ships. They would serve and serve.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 April 11 2016 15: 35
      +8
      Damn, the heart is already contracting .... what a pity, the handsome man was and what he turned into .... all our democrats .....
    5. Alexsasha77
      Alexsasha77 April 11 2016 15: 44
      +3
      of course it is sad.
      We will go to China and watch the history of our fleet.
    6. Alexsasha77
      Alexsasha77 April 11 2016 15: 44
      0
      of course it is sad.
      We will go to China and watch the history of our fleet.
      1. Michael67
        Michael67 April 11 2016 15: 56
        +9
        There was such a rumor that when they started towing the "Minsk", someone in charge stopped the operation. on board found not dismantled units of the identification system "friend or foe". In a hurry (I swear abusively).
        1. 16112014nk
          16112014nk April 11 2016 18: 46
          +7
          There is a version that it was not the ship (that is, the metal) that was sold, but the technology and the "stuffing" of the ship. The journalist Maltsev, who conducted an investigation into the sale of Pacific Fleet ships in 1994, wrote: "According to eyewitnesses, the secret part of the ship was filled up with top-secret devices almost to the ceiling."
          Engineers-controllers, shortly before the sale, reported to the military prosecutor's office, the naval counterintelligence service and the customs department: "... no traces of work on the organized dismantling of devices, equipment, units and parts were found ..."
          The remaining secret equipment on the aircraft carrier was in abundance: this is the Fregat target detection radar, fire control stations, and an automated air defense system, and a short-range navigation and aircraft landing system.
          The deck was covered with slabs, the composition of which in the west no one knew. They were made of complex polymers, which were developed by Soviet scientists for many years.
          I myself remember that many media wrote about it at that time. But the authorities and regulatory authorities were silent. Apparently, they were interested in such a sale. fool
    7. ava09
      ava09 April 11 2016 15: 53
      +10
      Quote: Michael67
      Sorry for the cruiser.
      How to make it so that it becomes one of the reminders for everyone of what jumping up to the songs of "partners" from the west leads to.

      And it’s easy, you have to make sure that everyone who organized this monstrous "Geopolitical Catastrophe of the 20th century", as the President said, sat down. In the not legally destroyed USSR, and accordingly alive and to this day, there was an article "Treason to the Motherland."
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 12 2016 01: 59
        0
        Quote: ava09
        we must make sure that everyone who organized this monstrous "Geopolitical Catastrophe of the 20th century" sat down

        - exactly, this is exactly what needs to be done! Only now - but how? what

        Quote: ava09
        Easy

        Oh how! So tell me, syroma and wretched - how exactly, (censorship), do this ?!

        PS: ... - do not toss the bags, yes negative
    8. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy April 11 2016 18: 47
      +1
      It would be necessary for the partners of real bolts-gadgets to toss, real, according to GOST.
      China needs it, they butt today for the waters with our enemy. The ship is good, powerful, expensive, and it was ours, and we need it, but they need it.
    9. UREC
      UREC April 11 2016 23: 02
      0
      It is better for a warship to die from enemy fire than to become a port hangout for a nation that does not know what the Navy is.
      1. Dam
        Dam April 12 2016 01: 36
        0
        Although Makarevich, now we are not a friend, I will quote the "Time machine": Than to become such a museum, it is better to go to the bottom "
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null April 12 2016 01: 44
          0
          Quote: Damm
          Although Makarevich, now we are not a friend, I will quote the "Time machine": Than to become such a museum, it is better to go to the bottom "

          If you quote, it’s right:

          "In order not to become such a museum, At the right time it is better to go to the bottom."

          I apologize for literacy, just such a memory .. photographic .. professional, probably request
  2. newcomer
    newcomer April 11 2016 15: 15
    +7
    stick trees, what a powerful beauty, or dangling power. sorry, really sorry.
  3. shark
    shark April 11 2016 15: 19
    0
    and can buy, upgrade .... Bullshit of course. but I think the whole country would support
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets April 11 2016 15: 25
      +12
      Quote: shark
      and can redeem, upgrade ..

      Repurchase, transportation, modernization with the replacement of almost all units and the installation of weapons. Take-off deck only for aircraft with explosives. Is the game worth the candle? request
    2. Bongo
      Bongo April 11 2016 15: 33
      +13
      Quote: shark
      and can buy, upgrade ...

      Alas, it will not be possible to return it to service. Before being sent abroad, Dalzavod carried out "pre-sale preparation". They cut pipelines and cables, disabled control systems and weapons. It will be cheaper to build a new one than to restore this one.
    3. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 April 11 2016 15: 36
      +2
      this is so ... but, the nerds will calculate in the Moscow region or in the Treasury and say .... inappropriate, not profitable, and so on ....
    4. Sally
      Sally April 11 2016 15: 43
      +1
      I agree to redeem (where to buy money and contents to take ()
      And also to make it a "museum and entertainment complex" (entertaining because small ones are drawn to sleep from dry Guides).
    5. Berber
      Berber April 11 2016 16: 40
      +1
      Unfortunately, this is a pile of iron, although it was a warship. It’s easier to build a new one.
  4. Stiletto
    Stiletto April 11 2016 15: 26
    +4
    Quote: shark
    and can buy, upgrade .... Bullshit of course. but I think the whole country would support


    These themselves can modernize quite well, as practice shows. I will not be surprised if after the Chinese "cosmetic repair" this ship will be able to drive US vessels like soap on a basin.
    1. cap
      cap April 11 2016 16: 42
      0
      Quote: Stiletto
      These themselves can modernize quite well, as practice shows. I will not be surprised if after the Chinese "cosmetic repair" this ship will be able to drive US vessels like soap on a basin.


      While guided tours will be conducted around the deck, welders will work in the holds.
      He will earn money for his repairs. Time will be saved on building a building.
      The aircraft carrier, too, seemed to be bought like nails.
      The Chinese are still those acne.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Cat man null
        Cat man null April 11 2016 19: 57
        0
        Quote: cap
        While guided tours will be conducted around the deck, welders will work in the holds

        Would you read the comments of smart people or something .. so as not to write nonsense request

        Quote: Bongo
        Alas, it will not be possible to return it to service. Before being sent abroad, Dalzavod carried out "pre-sale preparation". Pipes and cables cut, disabled control systems and weapons. It will be cheaper to build a new one than to restore this

        "Welders will work," damn it ... fool
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Black cat
    Black cat April 11 2016 15: 28
    +3
    Sorry for the boat. They sold it, like the whole country in the 90s.
  7. Oleg Lavrov
    Oleg Lavrov April 11 2016 15: 33
    0
    Sorry cruiser! The Chinese, put it in operation, and make it a serious combat power, now, they have all the opportunities for this!
  8. Galan
    Galan April 11 2016 15: 34
    +15
    And why did I "resist" in 1976 on his electrical installation? "DEMOCRACY" of the pocket!
  9. alfa19638
    alfa19638 April 11 2016 15: 41
    +4
    Selling liberal - democratic elite, Kolyma was waiting for your tired hands.
  10. PKK
    PKK April 11 2016 15: 41
    +8
    This is not just a Cruiser. It needs a whole squadron of escort services. Navigation and reconnaissance satellites, security submarines. Do you need an industry sector. Do you think the country will now pull the whole complex? It will happen that by the time of restoration the armaments and methods of war will change.
    It remains to admire the Cruiser and our shipbuilders who could build.
    1. tiredwithall
      tiredwithall April 11 2016 15: 53
      +3
      Nice to read competent comment.
      1. Foofighter
        Foofighter April 11 2016 17: 09
        +2
        As if the country did not have all of this (not a single satellite of navigation and reconnaissance, a submarine, a surface ship, and the like), and this country, if it exists, did not pull ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. newcomer
    newcomer April 11 2016 15: 55
    +4
    when he first found out this news, perceived it as a slap_military cruiser in the amusement? Yes, and Chinese? about the ransom, it would be possible to throw a cry to the people (I will chip in and I'm not alone) I assure you the people will respond, in addition to coward the oligarchs. modernization and debugging would have already taken up mo. we would get a people's cruiser. would have two instead of one. a question of the principle / importance of this action, as seen from above. I personally am for.
    1. albert
      albert April 11 2016 21: 02
      +1
      Quote: newbie
      one could throw a cry to the people

      It’s a good idea, with such a macar, one could even steal money for a new aircraft carrier if only they would not plunder. The Japanese in the 20s built a heavy battleship on public donations.
  12. certero
    certero April 11 2016 15: 57
    +1
    Quote: FooFighter
    And why do we need submarine strategic missile cruisers, if they are barefaced from the air they cost almost nothing?

    I recommend to deal with the use of particles not and not in Russian. And after that, talk about strategic missile cruisers. Which does not need air cover. Guess why? :)
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 11 2016 16: 15
      +2
      Quote: certero
      Which does not need air cover. Guess why? :)

      Those who need an air cover are just desperately needed, which is actually a well-known fact. Guess why?
  13. starschina
    starschina April 11 2016 16: 06
    +2
    to buy, to repair ????
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null April 11 2016 16: 13
      0
      Quote: starschina
      to buy, to repair ????

      fool

      - first sold to Koreans
      - Koreans sold to the Chinese
      - and now you want to redeem .. nu-nu wink Do you have yuan? 150 million so about?

      In 1993, the decision was made to disarm "Minsk", its exclusion from the Russian Navy with the transfer to OFI for dismantling and implementation. In August 1994, after the solemn descent of the Naval Flag, it was disbanded.

      At the end of 1995, Minsk was towed to South Korea to cut its body into metal. After the aircraft carrier was resold to the Chinese company Shenzhen Minsk Aircraft Carrier Industry Co Ltd. In 2006, when the company went bankrupt, Minsk became part of the Minsk World military park in Shenzhen.
      March 22, 2006 the aircraft carrier was put up for auction, but no buyers were found. On May 31, 2006, the aircraft carrier was auctioned again and was sold for 128 million yuan
  14. Grave of B. Cross2
    Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 16: 23
    -9
    There is no money in the country. All the damned musicians cleaned up. This one stole $ 2 billion (the cost of 571 Armata tanks). In the photo Serega Roldugin, a modest musician. The US is now confiscating those $ 2 billion and building a bunch of missiles. I wonder who these missiles will be against? hi
    1. Abbra
      Abbra April 11 2016 17: 10
      +1
      Excuse me, did you drink with this musician at the Brudershaft?
      1. Grave of B. Cross2
        Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 19: 02
        -8
        I drank with others, no. I did not hear anything about him. But it turns out he has such happiness ... WAS! Now the grandmother of this musician (and others) will go to strengthen the economies of the countries of potential opponents of Russia. With what we all congratulate!
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null April 11 2016 19: 11
          +1
          Quote: Grave of B. Cross2
          Now the grandmother of this musician (and others) will go to strengthen the economies of the countries of potential opponents of Russia

          This is what, excuse me, the way?
    2. parafoiler
      parafoiler April 11 2016 17: 16
      +2
      That's it: he is Roldugin, and you are the Grave ...
    3. vanavatny
      vanavatny April 11 2016 17: 29
      +1
      read the comments of this guardian of the fatherland: especially regarding the withdrawal of troops from Syria and about a hundred thousand Russian women (women, in his understanding),
    4. Grave of B. Cross2
      Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 17: 42
      -2
      As I understand it, the "guards" have been ordered to shield Roldugin in every possible way? Sure, not a problem! laughing Let it still beats. You look, a couple of billion bucks still steals. Russia is a rich country!
      1. vanavatny
        vanavatny April 11 2016 17: 47
        +1
        Of course, a clear order from Moscow, and to you from which capital?
        1. Grave of B. Cross2
          Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 18: 56
          -4
          Dear Vanyavatny, to me from the northern capital. From a hero city. St. Petersburg is called. Have you heard about this?
        2. Grave of B. Cross2
          Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 19: 07
          -3
          And this is for you, vanilla, to look and think. There are the right things.
          I hope Strelkova will not be called an agent of the state. depot. hi
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null April 11 2016 19: 31
            0
            Quote: Grave of B. Cross2
            look and think

            Grave - offers - think laughing

            Grave, you made me an evening, thank you .. but you yourself didn’t try to think?

            - Strelkov, of course, no one will call "an agent of the State Department"
            - but the rule "who dines a girl, he dances her", applies to everyone who allows himself to "dine"
            - including this rule applies to Strelkov. "The claw is stuck - the whole bird is lost."

            And claw, campaign, still bogged down .. sad
            1. vanavatny
              vanavatny April 11 2016 19: 38
              -2
              Well, yes, explode you with Strelkov’s brain at the high school students eager for the feat with the fiery hearts of revolutionaries, but I have long loved them, and who’s whose agent and after a hundred years is not always clear
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null April 11 2016 20: 28
                0
                Quote: vanavate
                blow you up with Strelkov’s brain in the thirsty feat of high school students with the fiery hearts of revolutionaries

                I didn’t understand one thing - why the answer to me, and not the Grave request

                Well, I’m kind of the same as you said, only more .. softly or something repeat
                1. vanavatny
                  vanavatny April 11 2016 20: 35
                  0
                  oh, simple, I don’t even know what to say here: for me it’s still a hobby and I’ve seen it with a thick finger laughing
            2. Grave of B. Cross2
              Grave of B. Cross2 April 11 2016 21: 24
              0
              Welcome hi, had a lot of fun. So for you a cellist with two billion dollars is not a "claw stuck" ?! Such a dear old man who throws loot in trains! By the way, our loot is with you. People's! But it is clear that you have some other source of income, that you are talking about this so calmly. Well, to the free - will. If I understood correctly, the "cellist" is dearer to your heart than Strelkov. Well yes. One for the idea, the second for the loot. Loot wins angry.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null April 11 2016 22: 06
                +1
                Quote: Grave of B. Cross2
                So for you a cellist with two billion dollars is not a "claw stuck" ?!

                - and what does it have to do with it? I talked about the video, which you posted with a call .. mmm ... think ... laughing

                Quote: Grave of B. Cross2
                But you can see some other source of income

                - I did not understand the logic .. the source is the salary .. when it is .. when it is not there - I live on what I managed to postpone from the salary yes

                Quote: Grave of B. Cross2
                If I understood correctly, then for you the "cellist" is dearer to your heart than Strelkov

                - Yes, I'm on the female side more .. I’m somehow men .. not really ..
                - no one is sweeter to me. And what Strelkov says there doesn’t please me personally No.

                PS: Grave .. would you change your nickname or something .. otherwise you should speak with the Grave somehow .. dumbly, IMHO request
  15. cedar
    cedar April 11 2016 16: 37
    +8
    Unfortunately, Minsk is no exception.
    "According to data from open sources, during the perestroika period only from 1991 to
    1997 years are written off and 629 warships sold for scrap
    Russian fleet. For comparison: during the Second World War
    Soviet Union lost 365 ships and submarines."

    This is what it means for the Navy to lose the Cold War to the West!
    1. Verdun
      Verdun April 11 2016 17: 46
      -1
      We did not lose the Cold War, but "sawed it out".
  16. Abbra
    Abbra April 11 2016 16: 49
    +2
    At the end of 1995, Minsk was towed to South Korea to cut its body into metal. After the aircraft carrier was resold to the Chinese company Shenzhen Minsk Aircraft Carrier Industry Co Ltd. In 2006, when the company went bankrupt, Minsk became part of the Minsk World military park in Shenzhen.

    March 22, 2006 the aircraft carrier was put up for auction, but no buyers were found. On May 31, 2006, the aircraft carrier was auctioned again and was sold for 128 million yuan...
  17. parafoiler
    parafoiler April 11 2016 17: 14
    0
    In the distant 1994, when the aircraft carriers Minsk and Novorossiysk were waiting for their fate near the wall in the Postovaya Bay of Sovetskaya Gavan, they tried to parachute onto the deck of one of them. Unfortunately, we could not agree with the command ...
  18. Verdun
    Verdun April 11 2016 17: 31
    -6
    I wonder if the cosmetic repairs will not flow smoothly into a large-scale modernization? But these ships could well serve Russia. And there would be no Mistrals. One thing is gratifying, they did not have time to sell them a couple of Typhoons to equip an amusement park.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 April 11 2016 19: 26
      0
      These ships are already outdated both physically and mentally.
      1. Verdun
        Verdun April 11 2016 19: 51
        +1
        Continuous upgrades are the normal way to keep a ship operational. A significant part of the US fleet is much older than the Minsk. The aircraft carrier "Dwight Eisenhower" - 1970, "Nimitz" - 1972, the cruiser "California" - 1970. South Carolina - 1972. This is just an example. Considering that, in essence, an aircraft carrier is a hangar with a flight deck fixed from above, such ships can live for a very long time.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 April 12 2016 01: 16
          0
          Only airplanes will not be able to fly from it - because we don’t have vertical take-off aircraft in service - that’s why we don’t need it.
  19. Sergey333
    Sergey333 April 11 2016 17: 56
    +3
    Quote: Black
    I must say thanks to the government of shit. A vivid illustration of how they sold the country. (And, as in this case, for a penny) 30.06.93 expelled from the Russian Navy and sold for $ 4,583 million to a South Korean company, which in turn resold it to the Chinese for 5 million $
    He served only 15 years, that for the ship in general about .... sad It’s like the prosecutor’s office was doing this, but it ended with NOTHING request

    This business could not end in anything, which means that the prosecutor had a summer house on the shores of the warm sea laughing
  20. kortik-68
    kortik-68 April 11 2016 19: 42
    +1
    HIMSELF AND REPAIRED HIMSELF AND HAS DEMONSTRATED- HATS HANDED IT FOR CHEAP am AS POSSIBLE TO PUT A COM. HUMAN TF WHICH THE FUTURE IS A GUIDER THROWS A BOAT ON THE JAPANESE BEACH-DO NOT UNDERSTAND !!!!!
    1. proud
      proud April 11 2016 22: 08
      0
      This is Russia we do not understand!
  21. certero
    certero April 11 2016 19: 48
    0
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    Those who need an air cover are just desperately needed, which is actually a well-known fact. Guess why?

    I will be glad to learn something new. How are you going to cover boats from the air, whose main trump card is stealth? Do you see any contradictions here?
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 12 2016 07: 30
      0
      Quote: certero
      I will be glad to learn something new. How are you going to cover boats from the air, whose main trump card is stealth?

      Elementary. Aviation is an extremely dangerous enemy of the submariner. And in our seas, in the threatened pre-war period, there will be no push from the "Elks" and "Virginias", which, by the way, are good at "landing on the tail" of our submarines. It is in order to squeeze them out of our sea areas or establish tracking for them and quickly crash with the beginning of the conflict, without allowing them to work out on SSBNs, and anti-submarine aviation is needed. And this aviation will not interfere with fighter cover
  22. Cat
    Cat April 11 2016 20: 52
    0
    The victory of Darwinism over socialism.
  23. proud
    proud April 11 2016 22: 26
    0
    A gloomy photo, although it didn’t serve, but I feel like a traitor to this ship! Its gloomy appearance as a reproach to all of us for what we did with this ship and with the country as a whole!
  24. TsUS-Air Force
    TsUS-Air Force April 11 2016 22: 59
    0
    mockery of pure water !!!
  25. Evil 55
    Evil 55 April 12 2016 05: 07
    0
    I have no doubt that after painting on it there will be tracking systems, guidance and new rocket toys, as well as a small wing of helicopters of twenty and about a thousand sailors .. And this Amusement Park will entertain Japanese residents of the Senkaku archipelago ..